Connecticut 2026 Session Status: Enacted 40 D cosponsors

SB 397 — AN ACT CONCERNING DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY AND THE USE AND RETENTION OF DATA DERIVED FROM AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READER SYSTEMS.

Last action — TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 03, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Ned Lamont (Democratic) on May 04, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 62% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 44 sponsors

    44 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (40 D).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1315 added · 1199 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill SB 397 includes a key addition that specifies that if a defendant is found liable for violating someone's constitutional rights, the court must award the plaintiff reasonable attorney's fees and expenses, unless deemed unjust by the court. This change is significant because it helps ensure that individuals who seek justice for their rights do not face financial barriers in pursuing their cases, making the legal process more accessible for everyone. Additionally, the term "entity" was removed, streamlining the focus on individual accountability.

→
Previous
Latest
Senate General Assembly File No.
Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 February Session, 2026 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 Public Act No.
397 Senate, April 2, 2026 The Committee on Judiciary reportedthrough SEN.
26-14 AN ACT CONCERNING DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY AND THE USE AND RETENTION OF DATA DERIVED FROM AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READER SYSTEMS.
WINFIELD of the 10th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) (a) Every person or entity, including a federal or state officer or employee who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of the United States or the state of Connecticut, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of this state or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured by the United States Constitution, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law or other proper proceeding for redress.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) (a) Every person, including a federal or state officer or employee who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of the United States or the state of Connecticut, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of this state or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured by the United States Constitution, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law or other proper proceeding for redress.
(b) (1) In a civil action brought pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, if the defendant is held liable, the court may award damages, including, but not limited to, nominal damages, actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief and other appropriate equitable relief, to protect the peaceable exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured by the United States sSB397 / File No.
(b) (1) In a civil action brought pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, if the defendant is held liable, the court may award damages, including, but not limited to, nominal damages, actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief and other appropriate equitable relief, to protect the peaceable exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured by the United States Constitution.
399 1 sSB397 File No.
(2) In a civil action brought pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 Constitution.
397 if the defendant is held liable, the court shall award the plaintiff reasonable attorney's fees and expenses, unless the court determines that special circumstances would render such an award unjust.
(2) In a civil action brought pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, if the defendant is held liable, the court shall award the plaintiff reasonable attorney's fees and costs in the court's discretion.
(d) No provision of this section shall be construed to constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity.
(d) No provision of this section shall be construed to constitute a waiver of the state's sovereign immunity.
(a)The Attorney Generalmay investigate, interveneinor bring a civil or administrative action in the name of the state, seeking injunctive or declaratory relief, damages, and any other relief that may be available under law, whenever any person is or has engaged in a practice or pattern of conduct, or has established a policy, that:
(a)The Attorney Generalmay investigate, intervene inor bring acivil or administrative action in the name of the state, seeking injunctive or declaratory relief, damages, and any other relief that may be available under law, whenever any person is or has engaged in a practice or pattern of conduct, or has established a policy, that:
sSB397 / File No.
Public Act No.
399 2 sSB397 File No.
26-14 2 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 (b) In conducting any investigation under this section, the Attorney General may issue subpoenas and interrogatories, and otherwise gather information, in the same manner and to the same extent as is provided in section 35-42.
397 (b) In conducting any investigation under this section, the Attorney General may issue subpoenas and interrogatories, and otherwise gather information, in the same manner and to the same extent as is provided in section 35-42.
[(d)] (e) In lieu of bringing a civil action under this section, the Attorney General may accept an assurance of the discontinuance of any allegedly unlawful or unconstitutional practice from any person sSB397 / File No.
Public Act No.
399 3 sSB397 File No.
26-14 3 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 engaged in such practice.
397 [(d)] (e) In lieu of bringing a civil action under this section, the Attorney General may accept an assurance of the discontinuance of any allegedly unlawful or unconstitutional practice from any person engaged in such practice.
If the Attorney General determines that a state officer or state employee is not entitled to indemnification under section 5-141d, the Attorney General may, as relates to such officer or employee, take any action authorized under this section.
If the Attorney General determines that a state officer or state employee is not entitled to indemnification under section 5-141d, the Attorney Public Act No.
[(k)] (l) With regard to any action brought pursuant to this section against a person for a pattern or practice of conduct in violation of section 46a-64, 46a-64c, 46a-81d or 46a-81e, or, as a result of an sSB397 / File No.
26-14 4 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 4 sSB397 File No.
397 General may, as relates to such officer or employee, take any action authorized under this section.
399 investigation conducted pursuant to this section, of a potential violation of section 46a-64, 46a-64c, 46a-81d or 46a-81e, the Attorney General may petition the superior court for the judicial district in which the violation or alleged violation occurred for any relief available under subsection (b) of section 46a-89, in addition to any relief as described in subsection (a) or (c) of this section.
[(k)] (l) With regard to any action brought pursuant to this section against a person for a pattern or practice of conduct in violation of section 46a-64, 46a-64c, 46a-81d or 46a-81e, or, as a result of an investigation conducted pursuant to this section, of a potential violation of section 46a-64, 46a-64c, 46a-81d or 46a-81e, the Attorney General may petition the superior court for the judicial district in which the violation or alleged violation occurred for any relief available under subsection (b) of section 46a-89, in addition to any relief as described in subsection (a) or (c) of this section.
(A) "Peace officer" means a member of the Division of State Police within the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection or an organized local police department, a chief inspector or inspector in the Division of Criminal Justice, a state marshal while exercising authority granted under any provision of the general statutes, a judicial marshal in the performance of the duties of a judicial marshal, a conservation officer or special conservation officer, as defined in section 26-5, a constable who performs criminal law enforcement duties, a special policeman appointed under section 29-18, 29-18a, 29-18b or 29- 19,anadultprobationofficer,anofficialoftheDepartmentofCorrection sSB397 / File No.
(A) "Peace officer" means a member of the Division of State Police Public Act No.
399 5 sSB397 File No.
26-14 5 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 authorized by the Commissioner of Correction to make arrests in a correctional institution or facility, any investigator in the investigations unit of the office of the State Treasurer, an inspector of motor vehicles in the Department of Motor Vehicles, who is certified under the provisions of sections 7-294a to 7-294e, inclusive, any federal law enforcement officer as defined under 18 USC 115(c)(1) and 34 USC 50301(5), or a member of a law enforcement unit of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe or the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut created and governed by a memorandum of agreement under section 47-65c who is certified as a police officer by the Police Officer Standards and Training Council pursuant to sections 7-294a to 7-294e, inclusive;
397 within the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection or an organized local police department, a chief inspector or inspector in the Division of Criminal Justice, a state marshal while exercising authority granted under any provision of the general statutes, a judicial marshal in the performance of the duties of a judicial marshal, a conservation officer or special conservation officer, as defined in section 26-5, a constable who performs criminal law enforcement duties, a special policeman appointed under section 29-18, 29-18a, 29-18b, 29-18c or 29-19, an adult probation officer, an official of the Department of Correction authorized by the Commissioner of Correction to make arrests in a correctional institution or facility, any investigator in the investigations unit of the office of the State Treasurer, an inspector of motor vehicles in the Department of Motor Vehicles, who is certified under the provisions of sections 7-294a to 7-294e, inclusive, any federal law enforcement officer as defined under 18 USC 115(c)(1) and 34 USC 50301(5), or a member of a law enforcement unit of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe or the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut created and governed by a memorandum of agreement under section 47-65c who is certified as a police officer by the Police Officer Standards and Training Council pursuant to sections 7-294a to 7-294e, inclusive;
[(a) (1)] (2) Whenever a peace officer, in the performance of such officer's duties, uses physical force upon another person and such person dies as a result thereof or uses deadly physical force [, as defined in section 53a-3,] upon another person, the Division of Criminal Justice shall cause an investigation to be made and the Inspector General shall have the responsibility of determining whether the use of physical force by the peace officer was justifiable under section 53a-22, as amended by this act.
[(a) (1)] (2) Whenever a peace officer, in the performance of such officer's duties, uses physical force upon another person and such person dies as a result thereof or uses deadly physical force [, as defined in section 53a-3,] upon another person, the Division of Criminal Justice shall cause an investigation to be made and the Inspector General shall have the responsibility of determining whether the use of physical force by the peace officer was justifiable under section 53a-22, as amended by Public Act No.
26-14 6 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 this act.
[(2)] (3) (A) Except as provided under subdivision [(1)] (2) of this subsection, whenever a person dies in the custody of a peace officer or law enforcement agency, the Inspector General shall investigate and determine whether physical force was used by a peace officer upon the deceased person, and if so, whether the use of physical force by the peace officer was justifiable under section 53a-22, as amended by this act.
[(2)] (3) (A) Except as provided under subdivision [(1)] (2) of this subsection, whenever a person dies [in the] within the physical custody ofa peace officer or lawenforcement agency, theInspector Generalshall investigate and determine whether physical force was used by a peace officer upon the deceased person, and if so, whether the use of physical force by the peace officer was justifiable under section 53a-22, as amended by this act.
If the Inspector General determines the deceased person may have died as a result of criminal action not involving the use of force by a sSB397 / File No.
If the Inspector General determines the deceased person may have died as a result of criminal action not involving the use of force by a peace officer,theInspector Generalshallrefer such case to the Chief State's Attorney or a state's attorney for potential prosecution.
399 6 sSB397 File No.
(B) Except as provided under subdivision [(1)] (2) of this subsection or subparagraph (A) of this subdivision, [(2) of this subsection,] whenever a person dies [in the] within the physical custody of the Commissioner ofCorrection,theInspector Generalshallinvestigateand determine whether the deceased person may have died as a result of criminal action, and, if so, refer such case to the Chief State's Attorney or a state's attorney for potential prosecution.
399 peace officer, the Inspector General shall refer such case to the Chief State's Attorney or a state's attorney for potential prosecution.
The Inspector General may issue a report concerning the death of such person, which may include, but need not be limited to, any recommended future action to be taken by said commissioner.
(B) Except as provided under subdivision [(1)] (2) of this subsection or subparagraph (A) of this subdivision, [(2) of this subsection,] whenever a person dies in the custody of the Commissioner of Correction, the Inspector General shall investigate and determine whether the deceased person may have died as a result of criminal action, and, if so, refer such case to the Chief State's Attorney or a state's attorney for potential prosecution.
[(3)] (4) Whenever a person who (A) is a next of kin of a deceased person, (B) is not notified of such deceased person's death as required pursuant to section 7-294mm and no other person who is a next of kin of the deceased person was so notified, and (C) requests of the Office of the Inspector General an investigation of the lack of notification or timely notification of such death, the Inspector General shall investigate anddeterminewhethertherewasanymalfeasanceonthepartofapeace Public Act No.
[(3)] (4) Whenever a person who (A) is a next of kin of a deceased person, (B) is not notified of such deceased person's death as required pursuant to section 7-294mm and no other person who is a next of kin of the deceased person was so notified, and (C) requests of the Office of the Inspector General an investigation of the lack of notification or timely notification of such death, the Inspector General shall investigate anddeterminewhethertherewasanymalfeasanceonthepartofapeace officer, except for a federal law enforcement officer, or a supervisor of the peace officer, except for a federal law enforcement officer, in the failure to provide such notification or timely notification, and if so, may make recommendations to the Police Officer Standards and Training Council established under section 7-294b concerning censure, suspension, renewal, cancelation or revocation of the peace officer's or supervisor's certification, provided any such recommendation may be made to said council only in a case where such failure is found to be intentional or made with reckless indifference.
26-14 7 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 officer, except for a federal law enforcement officer, or a supervisor of the peace officer, except for a federal law enforcement officer, in the failure to provide such notification or timely notification, and if so, may make recommendations to the Police Officer Standards and Training Council established under section 7-294b concerning censure, suspension, renewal, cancelation or revocation of the peace officer's or supervisor's certification, provided any such recommendation may be made to said council only in a case where such failure is found to be intentional or made with reckless indifference.
sSB397 / File No.
(B) The Division of Criminal Justice and the Inspector General shall have the unrestricted right to access the scene and collect evidence whenever a peace officer, in the performance of such officer's duties, usesphysicalforce uponanother personandsuchpersondiesasaresult thereof or uses deadly physical force, or a person dies in the custody of a peace officer or law enforcement agency, regardless of whether such incident involved only peace officers employed by the federal government anddidnot involve any peace officer employedby thestate or a municipality.
399 7 sSB397 File No.
(C) If any person restricts the Division of Criminal Justice or the Inspector General's right to access the scene and collect evidence as set forth in subparagraph (B) of this subdivision, the Division of Criminal Justice or the Inspector General may bring an action in the Superior Court for injunctive relief against any person who has committed the Public Act No.
399 (B) The Division of Criminal Justice and the Inspector General shall have the unrestricted right to access the scene and collect evidence whenever a peace officer, in the performance of such officer's duties, usesphysicalforce uponanother personandsuchpersondiesasaresult thereof or uses deadly physical force, or a person dies in the custody of a peace officer or law enforcement agency, regardless of whether such incident involved only peace officers employed by the federal government anddidnot involve any peace officer employedby thestate or a municipality.
26-14 8 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
(C) If any person restricts the Division of Criminal Justice or the Inspector General's right to access the scene and collect evidence as set forth in subparagraph (B) of this subdivision, the Division of Criminal Justice or the Inspector General may bring an action in the Superior Court for injunctive relief against any person who has committed the violation.
397 violation.
The Inspector General shall complete the sSB397 / File No.
The Inspector General shall complete the report and submit a copy of such report not later than five business days after the cause of the death is available to theChief State's Attorney and, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a, to the joint standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to the judiciary and public safety.
Show all 394 changed rows (354 more)
Previous
Latest
399 8 sSB397 File No.
399 report and submit a copy of such report not later than five business days after the cause of the death is available to theChief State's Attorney and, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a, to the joint standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to the judiciary and public safety.
(1) The circumstances of the incident, (2) a determination of whether the use of physical force by the peace officer was justifiable under section 53a-22, as amended by this act, and (3) any recommended future action to be taken by the Office of the Inspector General as a result of the incident.
(1) The circumstances of the incident, (2) a determination of whether the use of physical force by the peace officer was justifiable under section 53a-22, as amended by this act, and Public Act No.
The Chief State's Attorney shall provide a copy of the report to the chief executive officer of the municipality in which the incident occurred and to the Commissioner of Emergency Services and Public Protection or the chief of police of such municipality, as the case may be, and shall make such report available to the public on the Division of Criminal Justice's Internet web site not later than forty-eight hours after the copies are provided to the chief executive officer and the commissioner or chief of police.
26-14 9 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 (3) any recommended future action to be taken by the [Office of the Inspector General] law enforcement agency as a result of the incident.
The Chief State's Attorney shall provide a copy of the report to the chief executive officer of the municipality in which the incident occurred and to theCommissioner ofEmergency ServicesandPublicProtectionorthe chief of police of such municipality, as the case may be, and shall make such report available to the public on the Division of Criminal Justice's Internet web site not later than forty-eight hours after the copies are provided to the chief executive officer and the commissioner or chief of police.
If the believed facts or circumstances would not in law constitute an offense, sSB397 / File No.
If the believed facts or circumstances would not in law constitute an offense, an erroneous though not unreasonable belief that the law is otherwise does not render justifiable the use of physical force to make an arrest or to prevent an escape from custody;
399 9 sSB397 File No.
399 an erroneous though not unreasonable belief that the law is otherwise does not render justifiable the use of physical force to make an arrest or to prevent an escape from custody;
(2) A peace officer or an authorized official of the Department of Correction or the Board of Pardons and Paroles who is effecting an arrest pursuant to a warrant or preventing an escape from custody is justified in using the physical force prescribed in subsections (b), (c) and (d) of this section unless such warrant is invalid and is known by such officer to be invalid.
(2) A peace officer or an authorized official of the Department of Correction or the Board of Pardons and Paroles who is effecting an Public Act No.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (a) or (d) of this section, a peace officer or an authorized official of the Department of Correction or the Board of Pardons and Paroles is justified in using physical force upon anotherpersonwhenandtotheextentthatheorshereasonablybelieves such use to be necessary to:
26-14 10 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 arrest pursuant to a warrant or preventing an escape from custody is justified in using the physical force prescribed in subsections (b), (c) and (d) of this section unless such warrant is invalid and is known by such officer to be invalid.
(b) Except as provided in subsection (a) or (d) of this section, a peace officer or an authorized official of the Department of Correction or the Board of Pardons and Paroles is justified in using physical force upon anotherpersonwhenandtotheextentthat heorshereasonablybelieves such use to be necessary to:
or (B)Heor she(i)hasreasonably determinedthat there are no available sSB397 / File No.
or (B)Heor she(i)hasreasonably determinedthat there are no available reasonable alternatives to the use of deadly physical force, (ii) reasonably believes that the force employed creates no unreasonable risk of injury to a third party, and (iii) reasonably believes such use of force to be necessary to (I) effect an arrest of a person whom he or she reasonably believes has committed or attempted to commit a felony Public Act No.
399 10 sSB397 File No.
26-14 11 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 reasonable alternatives to the use of deadly physical force, (ii) reasonably believes that the force employed creates no unreasonable risk of injury to a third party, and (iii) reasonably believes such use of force to be necessary to (I) effect an arrest of a person whom he or she reasonably believes has committed or attempted to commit a felony which involved the infliction of serious physical injury, and if, where feasible, he or she has given warning of his or her intent to use deadly physicalforce, or (II)prevent theescapefromcustody ofapersonwhom he or she reasonably believes has committed a felony which involved the infliction of serious physical injury and who poses a significant threatofdeathorseriousphysicalinjurytoothers,andif,wherefeasible, he or she has given warning of his or her intent to use deadly physical force.
397 which involved the infliction of serious physical injury, and if, where feasible, he or she has given warning of his or her intent to use deadly physicalforce, or (II)prevent theescapefromcustody ofapersonwhom he or she reasonably believes has committed a felony which involved the infliction of serious physical injury and who poses a significant threatofdeathorseriousphysicalinjurytoothers,andif,wherefeasible, he or she has given warning of his or her intent to use deadly physical force.
sSB397 / File No.
(e) Except as provided in subsection (f) of this section, a person who has been directed by a peace officer or an authorized official of the Department of Correction or the Board of Pardons and Paroles to assist Public Act No.
399 11 sSB397 File No.
26-14 12 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 (e) Except as provided in subsection (f) of this section, a person who has been directed by a peace officer or an authorized official of the Department of Correction or the Board of Pardons and Paroles to assist such peace officer or official to effect an arrest or to prevent an escape from custody is justified in using reasonable physical force when and to the extent that he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary to carry out such peace officer's or official's direction.
397 such peace officer or official to effect an arrest or to prevent an escape from custody is justified in using reasonable physical force when and to the extent that he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary to carry out such peace officer's or official's direction.
Section 51-277e of the 2026 supplement to the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective from Public Act No.
26-14 13 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 passage):
(a) There is established the Office of the Inspector General that shall be a separate office within the Division of Criminal Justice.
Not later than October 1, 2021, the Criminal Justice Commission established pursuant to section 51-275a shall appoint a deputy chief state's attorney as Inspector General who shall lead the Office of the Inspector General.
The office shall:
(1) Conduct investigations of peace officers in accordance with section 51-277a, as amended by this act;
(2) prosecute any case in which the Inspector General determines a peace officer used force found to not be justifiable pursuant to section 53a-22, as amended bythisact,orwhereapoliceofficerorcorrectionofficerfailstointervene in any such incident or to report any such incident, as required under subsection (a) of section 7-282e or section 18-81nn, as applicable;
(3) investigate any failureto report thedeathofapersoninaccordance with the provisions of section 7-294mm;
(4) investigate any failure to report in accordance with the provisions of subdivision (1) of subsection (h) of section 7-294d;
(5) investigate the death of a person within the physical custody of a peace officer or law enforcement agency or the Commissioner of Correction in accordance with the provisions of subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 51-277a, as amended by this act;
and [(5)] (6) make recommendations to the Police Officer Standards and Training Council established under section 7-294b concerning censure and suspension, renewal, cancelation or revocation of a peace officer's certification, provided in the case of a failure to report a death ofaperson,anysuchrecommendationmaybemadetosaidcouncilonly in a case where such failure is found to be intentional or made with reckless indifference, or if there is no finding that such failure was intentional or made with reckless indifference, a recommendation may be made to the officer's employing agency for any further disciplinary action as so determined by such employing agency.
As used in this subsection, "peace officer" has the same meaning as provided in section 51-277a, as amended by this act.
Public Act No.
26-14 14 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 (b) The Inspector General shall serve a term of four years from July first in the year of the appointment unless sooner removed by the Criminal Justice Commission.
The commission shall not be precluded from reappointing an individual who has previously served as Inspector General.
(c) An Inspector General may be removed or otherwise disciplined only in accordance with section 51-278b.
(d)The Inspector Generalmay issuesubpoenasto municipalities, law enforcement units, as defined in section 7-294, the Department of Correction and any employee or former employee of the municipality, unit or department (1) requiring the production of reports, records or otherdocumentsconcerninganinvestigationdescribedinsubsection(a) of this section that is undertaken by the Inspector General, and (2) compelling the attendance and testimony of any person having knowledgepertinenttosuchinvestigationataninvestigativedeposition conductedbytheInspectorGeneral,ortheInspectorGeneral'sdesignee.
(e) A chief of police of a municipality, the Commissioner of Emergency Services and Public Protection or the Commissioner of Correction may refer and the Inspector General shall accept any such referral of an incident described in subsection (a) of this section for purposes of an investigation.
(f) The Office of the Inspector General shall be at a location that is separate from the locations of the Office of the Chief State's Attorney or any of the state's attorneys for the judicial districts.
(g) The Inspector General may employ necessary staff to fulfil the duties of the Office of the Inspector General described in subsection (a) of this section.
Such staff shall be selected by the Inspector General within the confines of any existing collective bargaining agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, an assistant state's attorney or a Public Act No.
26-14 15 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 deputy assistant state's attorney, an inspector and administrative staff.
As needed by and upon request of the Inspector General, the Office of the Chief State's Attorney shall ensure assistance from additional assistant state's attorneys or deputy assistant state's attorneys, inspectors and administrative staff.
Sec.
6.
(1) "Peace officer" has the same meaning as provided in section 51-277a of sSB397 / File No.
(1) "Peace officer" has the same meaning as provided in section 51-277a of the general statutes, as amended by this act;
399 12 sSB397 File No.
399 the general statutes, as amended by this act;
Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, a peace officer assigned to a bomb squad, motorcycle unit or specialized weapons and tactics team is permitted to utilize gear necessary to protect such officer's face and head from physical harm while performing the duties associated with such assignment.
Notwithstanding the provisions Public Act No.
(c) In accordance with the provisions of section 7-294ii of the general statutes, a peace officer, while carrying out the enforcement of laws of this state, any other state or the United States, shall be clearly identified by such officer's badge and name tag on the officer's uniform, unless (1) such officer is performing duties during an active undercover assignment authorized by supervising personnel, (2) compliance is sSB397 / File No.
26-14 16 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 13 sSB397 File No.
397 of this subsection, a peace officer assigned to a bomb squad, motorcycle unit or specialized weapons and tactics team is permitted to utilize gear necessary to protect such officer's face and head from physical harm while performing the duties associated with such assignment.
399 excused pursuant to the model policy adopted pursuant to section 7- 294ii of the general statutes, or (3) compliance is excused pursuant to a court order.
Any peace officer who violates the provisions of this subsection shall be guilty of a class D misdemeanor.
(d) Any peace officer who violates the provisions of subsection (b) or (c) of this section shall be guilty of a class D misdemeanor.
(c) In accordance with the provisions of section 7-294ii of the general statutes, a peace officer, who is conducting a planned arrest or interacting with the public in such officer's official capacity and is authorized to make arrests, shall be clearly identified by such officer's badge and name tag on the officer's uniform, unless (1) such officer is performing duties during an active undercover assignment authorized by supervising personnel, (2) compliance is excused pursuant to the model policy adopted pursuant to section 7-294ii of the general statutes, (3) compliance is excused pursuant to a court order, or (4) while in the performance of such officer's duties, weather-related events or traffic safety issues exist that prevent such officer from having a name tag or badge on such officer's outer garment.
(e) Notwithstanding any other law, any peace officer who is found to have committed an intentional tort of assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, abuse of process or malicious prosecution pursuant to state law or 28 USC 2680(h), while wearing a facial covering or personal disguise in a knowing and wilful violation of this section, shallnot beentitledtoassert any privilege or immunity for suchofficer's tortious conduct against a claim of civil liability.
Any peace officer who intentionally violates the provisions of this subsection shall be guilty of a class D misdemeanor.
(d) Notwithstanding any other law, any peace officer who is found to have committed an intentional tort of assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, abuse of process or malicious prosecution pursuant to state law or 28 USC 2680(h), while wearing a facial covering or personal disguise in a knowing and wilful violation of this section, shallnot beentitledtoassert any privilege or immunity for suchofficer's tortious conduct against a claim of civil liability.
6.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) No armed military force from another state, territory or district is permitted to enter the state of Connecticut for the purpose of engaging in military duty within this state without the express written permission of the Governor of this state, unless such force has been called into active service of the United Statesandisacting under authority ofthePresident oftheUnitedStates.
Sec.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) (a) As used in this section:
(NEW) (Effective October 1, 2026) (a) As used in this section:
(1)"Protectedarea"meansanyofthefollowingbuildingsorlocations, including the grounds of such buildings or locations and any garages or parking lots utilized in the operation of such buildings or locations, irrespective of whether such garages or parking lots are contiguous to the buildings or locations:
(1)"Protectedarea"meansanyofthefollowingbuildingsorlocations, including the grounds of such buildings or locations and any garages or Public Act No.
26-14 17 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 parking lots utilized in the operation of such buildings or locations, irrespective of whether such garages or parking lots are contiguous to the buildings or locations:
(B) A medical or mental health facility, including, but not limited to, a hospital,doctor'soffice, healthclinic,vaccinationortesting site,urgent care center, site that serves pregnant individuals or community health center;
(B) A hospital licensed pursuant to the provisions of chapter 368v of the general statutes or an urgent care center, as defined in section 19a- 493d of the general statutes;
sSB397 / File No.
(C) A place of worship or religious study;
399 14 sSB397 File No.
(D) A playground, recreation center, child care center, before or after- school care center, foster care facility, group home for children or school bus stop when children are present;
399 (C) A place of worship or religious study, whether in a structure dedicated to activities of faith or a temporary facility or location where such activities take place;
(E) A social services establishment, including, but not limited to, a crisis center, domestic violence shelter, victims services center, child advocacy center, supervised visitation center, family justice center, facility that serves disabled persons, homeless shelter, drug or alcohol counseling and treatment facility, or food bank, pantry or other establishment distributing food or other essentials of life to people in need;
(D) A place where children gather, including, but not limited to, a playground, recreation center, child care center, before or after-school care center, foster care facility, group home for children or school bus stop;
(E) A social services establishment, including, but not limited to, a crisis center, domestic violence shelter, victims services center, child advocacy center, supervised visitation center, family justice center, community-based organization, facility that serves disabled persons, homeless shelter, drug or alcohol counseling and treatment facility, or food bank, pantry or other establishment distributing food or other essentials of life to people in need;
(G) A place where a funeral, graveside ceremony, rosary, wedding or other religious or civil ceremonies or observances occur;
or (G) A cemetery or other place of internment for the deceased.
or (H)A place where there isanongoing parade,demonstrationorrally.
(2) "State facility" means any building, or part thereof, owned, leased, occupied, controlled by or used for business by an office or agency of Public Act No.
(2) "State facility" means any building, or part thereof, owned, leased, occupied, controlled by or used for business by an office or agency of the Executive Department, either directly or indirectly, including, but not limited to, entities providing direct services on behalf of offices or agencies, but not including state-owned property leased to a federal entity.
26-14 18 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 the Executive Department, either directly or indirectly, including, but not limited to, entities providing direct services on behalf of offices or agencies, but not including state-owned property leased to a federal entity.
sSB397 / File No.
(3) "Municipal facility" means any building or part thereof, owned, leased, occupied, controlled by or used for business by a municipal government, either directly or indirectly, including, but not limited to, entities providing direct services on behalf of a municipal government.
399 15 sSB397 File No.
399 (3) "Municipal facility" means any building or part thereof, owned, leased, occupied, controlled by or used for business by a municipal government, either directly or indirectly, including, but not limited to, entities providing direct services on behalf of a municipal government.
(b) No peace officer, as defined in section 51-277a of the general statutes, as amended by this act, shall detain, arrest or otherwise take an individual in a protected area, state facility or municipal facility into custody on the basis of a civil offense, unless (1) such peace officer is acting in the peace officer's official capacity, and (2) the individual to be detained, arrested or otherwise taken into custody is the subject of a judicial warrant.
(4) "Civil offense" means an offense for which a local, state or federal civil proceeding is available to the charged individual to offer a defense.
"Civil offense" does not include any offense identified as an infraction by the general statutes, a motor vehicle violation or an arrest allowed (A)for anallegedviolationofthecriminallaw of:(i)Thestate or another jurisdiction within the United States, for which a sentence of a term of imprisonment is authorized by law;
or (ii) the United States, for which a sentence of a term of imprisonment is authorized by law, and for which federal law requires an initial appearance before a federal judge, federal magistrate or other judicial officer, pursuant to the federal rules of criminal procedure that govern initial appearances;
(B) for contempt of court;
(C) for a capias issued by a judge;
(D) in response to a warrant for a violation of parole or probation;
or (E) for commitment under emergency certificate or other arrest permitted under chapter 319i of the general statutes.
(b) No peace officer, as defined in section 51-277a of the general Public Act No.
26-14 19 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 statutes, as amended by this act, shall detain, arrest or otherwise take an individual in a protected area, state facility or municipal facility into custody on the basis of a civil offense, unless (1) such peace officer is acting in the peace officer's official capacity, and (2) the individual to be detained, arrested or otherwise taken into custody is the subject of a judicial warrant.
Section 7-294d of the general statutes is amended by adding subsection (i) as follows (Effective from passage):
Section 51-33b of the 2026 supplement to the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective from passage):
(NEW) (i) (1) As used in this subsection, "comparative certification" means the certification of a candidate for a police officer position, who has served as a police officer in another state or in a law enforcement unit within the state that is not subject to the provisions of the general statutes and the regulations of Connecticut state agencies applicable to the Police Officer Standards and Training Council.
(a) No representative of a local, state or federal law enforcement authority shall detain, arrest or otherwise take an individual on courthouse grounds into custody on the basis of a civil offense, unless such representative (1) is acting in the representative's official capacity, and (2) has notified a judicial marshal within the courthouse in which the representative intends to detain, arrest or otherwise take an individual into custody and has provided documentation to the judicial marshal demonstrating that the individual to be detained, arrested or otherwise taken into custody (A) is the subject of a judicial warrant, (B) has been convicted of (i) a violation of section 53-21, 53a-56a, 53a-64aa, 53a-71, 53a-72a, 53a-72b, 53a-90a, 53a-102a, 53a-196e, 53a-196f, 53a-196i, 53a-222 or 53a-223, or (ii) any class A or B felony offense, or (C) is identified as a possible match in the federal Terrorist Screening Database or similar database.
(2) A candidate for comparative certification to a position as a police sSB397 / File No.
The provisions of this subsection do not Public Act No.
399 16 sSB397 File No.
26-14 20 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 officer in any law enforcement unit within the state shall satisfactorily meet all entry level requirements of the council.
397 apply to a judicial marshal detaining, arresting or otherwise taking an individual on courthouse grounds into custody.
The candidate shall also complete a police basic training program approved by the council.
(b) Any judicial marshal receiving documentation pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall promptly review such documentation in accordance with policies and procedures approved by the Office of the Chief Court Administrator.
(3) The council may grant a full or partial waiver of the police basic training requirement, specifying the elements of the program, if any, the candidate will be required to satisfactorily complete.
No representative of a local, state or federal law enforcement authority shall detain, arrest or otherwise take an individual on courthouse grounds into custody on the basis of a civil offense who is the subject of such documentation, unless the judicial marshal determines, based upon such review, that such individual (1) is the subject of a judicial warrant, (2) has been convicted of (A) a violation of section 53-21, 53a-56a, 53a-64aa, 53a-71, 53a-72a, 53a-72b, 53a-90a, 53a-102a, 53a-196e, 53a-196f, 53a-196i, 53a-222 or 53a-223, or (B) any class A or B felony offense, or (3) is identified as a possible match in the federal Terrorist Screening Database or similar database.
A request for waiver of the requirement of police basic training shall be forwarded to the council, in writing, by the chief of police of the law enforcement unit seeking to employ such police officer, giving all pertinent information.
(c) Any violation of the provisions of this section may be deemed contempt of court and punished in accordance with the provisions of section 51-33.
If the request for a waiver originates from a municipality or agency for which there is no chief of police, or concerns the position of chief of police, the request shall be made by the candidate's appointing authority.
(d) Any individual aggrieved by a violation of this section may bring a civil action for equitable relief or damages in the Superior Court.
(4) In determining whether to waive all or a portion of the required police basic training program, the council shall evaluate in comparison to current standards the quality and extent of the candidate's (A) previous basic training and certification as a police officer;
A civil action brought for damages may be triable by jury.
(B) formal, professional and in-service training and education in law enforcement andcriminal justice;
(e) In any action pursuant to this section, the court may award reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred to the prevailing party.
(C)lengthofservice andfieldexperience asapolice officer;
(f) No action may be commenced pursuant to subsection (d) of this section against the Judicial Branch or any officer or employee of said branch acting lawfully pursuant to such officer's or employee's official capacity, regarding actions or omissions of said branch or such officer or employee.
and (D) length of absence from employment with a law enforcement unit.
(g) The provisions of this section shall not be construed to prohibit a Public Act No.
(5) The council may waive those portions of the police basic training program for which a candidate demonstrates (A) the satisfactory completion of a substantially equivalent training or educational program in another state or jurisdiction, (B) a length of service with field experience sufficient to establish a practical mastery of the required skills, or (C) a satisfactory combination of both.
26-14 21 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
(6) The council may not waive any portion of the required basic training program for any candidate, even if the candidate previously held certification from another state, local or federal law enforcement agency, if such certification did not require the completion of a substantially equivalent training or educational program, including a minimum of four hundred eighty hours of training.
397 representativeofa local,stateor federallawenforcement authority from detaining, arresting or otherwise taking an individual on courthouse grounds into custody on the basis of a civil offense, if such action is in compliance with the provisions of this section and section 54-192h.
sSB397 / File No.
(h) For purposes of this section, (1) "courthouse" means the interior of any facility or property in which a court of this state conducts business, [and] (2) "courthouse grounds" includes the courthouse and any garage or parking lot owned by the Judicial Branch, or under contract with said branch, for the purpose of serving a courthouse, any walkways or sidewalks on the grounds of, contiguous to or abutting the grounds of the courthouse or connecting such garage or parking lot to the courthouse or grounds of the courthouse, and (3) "civil offense" has the same meaning as provided in section 7 of this act.
399 17 sSB397 File No.
Sec.
399 Sec.
Subsection (b) of section 7-294d of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective from passage):
(b) (1) No person may be employed as a police officer by any law enforcement unit for a period exceeding one year unless such person has been certified under the provisions of subsection (a) of this section or has been granted an extension by the council.
No person may serve as a police officer during any period when such person's certification has been cancelled or revoked pursuant to the provisions of subsection (c) of this section.
In addition to the requirements of this subsection, the council may establish other qualifications for the employment of police officers and require evidence of fulfillment of these qualifications.
The certification of any police officer who is not employed by a law enforcement unit for a period of time in excess of two years, unless such officer is on leave of absence, shall be considered lapsed.
Upon reemployment as a police officer, such officer shall apply for recertification in a manner provided by the council, provided such recertificationprocessrequiresthepoliceofficertosubmittoaurinalysis Public Act No.
26-14 22 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 drug test that screens for controlled substances, including, but not limited to, anabolic steroids, and receive a result indicating no presence of any controlled substance not prescribed for the officer.
(2) The council shall certify any applicant who presents evidence of satisfactory completion of a program or course of instruction in another state or, if the applicant is a veteran or a member of the armed forces or the National Guard, as part of training during service in the armed forces, that is equivalent in content and quality to that required in this state, provided such applicant passes an examination or evaluation as required by the council.
The council shall not waive any portion of the required basic training program for any applicant who has previously served as a peace officer, or who, at the time the application is made, is serving as a peace officer, unless the applicant presents evidence of satisfactorily completing a substantially equivalent training or educational program, which includes a minimum of four hundred eighty hours of training.
Nothing in this section shall require the council to waive any portion of the required basic training program for any applicant who has previously served as a peace officer, or who, at the time the application is made, is serving as a peace officer.
For the purposes of this [section,] subsection, (A) "veteran" and "armed forces" have the same meanings as provided in section 27-103, and (B) "peace officer" has the same meaning as provided in section 51-277a, as amended by this act.
Sec.
10.
(b) An employer of a peace officer who interferes with any person taking a photographicor digitalstillorvideo image ofsuchpeace officer or another peace officer acting in the performance of such peace officer's duties shall be liable to such person in an action at law, suit in equity or other proper proceeding for redress.
Public Act No.
26-14 23 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 (b) An employer of a peace officer who interferes with any person taking a photographicor digitalstillorvideo image ofsuchpeace officer or another peace officer acting in the performance of such peace officer's duties shall be liable to such person in an action at law, suit in equity or other proper proceeding for redress.
sSB397 / File No.
Sec.
399 18 sSB397 File No.
11.
399 Sec.
10.
Sec.
Public Act No.
11.
26-14 24 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
397 Sec.
12.
and (2) "serious misconduct" means improper or illegal actions taken by a [police] peace officer in connection with such officer's official duties that could result in a miscarriage of justice or discrimination, including, but not limited sSB397 / File No.
and (2) "serious misconduct" means improper or illegal actions taken by a [police] peace officer in connection with such officer's official duties that could result in a miscarriage of justice or discrimination, including, but not limited to, (A) a conviction of a felony, (B) fabrication of evidence, (C) repeated use of excessive force, (D) acceptance of a bribe, or (E) the commission of fraud.
399 19 sSB397 File No.
Public Act No.
399 to, (A) a conviction of a felony, (B) fabrication of evidence, (C) repeated use of excessive force, (D) acceptance of a bribe, or (E) the commission of fraud.
26-14 25 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
397 Sec.
Section 1 from passage New section Sec.
13.
2 from passage 3-129g Sec.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) (a) As used in this section and sections 14 and 15 of this act:
3 from passage 51-277a Sec.
(1) "Automated license plate reader system" means a mobile or fixed electronic image recording device that is capable, in combination with computer programs or algorithms, of converting images of license plates or vehicle descriptors into computer-readable data.
4 from passage 53a-22 Sec.
"Automated license plate reader system" does not include an image recording device that provides evidence used in enforcement of an offense specified in the general statutes or by municipal ordinance, including, but not limited to, such devices as an automated traffic enforcement safety device, as defined in section 14-307b of the general statutes, or those used as part of a work zone speed control system, as defined in section 13a-261 of the general statutes, or a municipal school bus violation enforcement system, as defined in section 14-279c of the general statutes;
5 from passage New section Sec.
(2) "Automated license plate reader data" includes any data captured, recorded, held or stored, processed or derived from an automated license plate reader system, including, but not limited to, license plate characters, vehicle still or video images, vehicle attributes, location data, time stamps and metadata;
6 from passage New section Sec.
(3) "Gender-affirming health care services" has the same meaning as provided in section 52-571m of the general statutes;
7 from passage New section Sec.
(4) "Hotlist" means a list of registration numbers displayed on license plates maintained for comparison against a registration number collected by an automated license plate reader system;
8 from passage 7-294d(i) Sec.
(5) "Internal hotlist addendum" means a hotlist that (A) is maintained for use only at a specific state facility or facilities for which the list was made and by the public agency that made such list, and (B) may contain registration numbers displayed on a license plate of a motor vehicle Public Act No.
9 from passage 52-571j Sec.
26-14 26 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
10 from passage New section Sec.
397 registered to a person who is identified in the making of such list as a potential threat to a person in the state facility, to the state facility or against the public agency operating the state facility, for reasons that include a previous conviction of such person for a misdemeanor or felony offense involving threats of physical violence or harassment against a person in the state facility, to the state facility or against the public agency operating the state facility or conduct by a person that is documented and involves threats of or attempted violence, harassment or incitement of physical violence against a person in the state facility, to the state facility or against the public agency operating the state facility, provided no such inclusion on an internal hot list addendum is based on an arrest for or conduct that is solely speech, conduct or association protected by article first of the Constitution of the state or the first amendment to the United States Constitution.
11 from passage 7-291c Statement of Legislative Commissioners:
(6) "Law enforcement agency" means a department or agency for which a law enforcement officer is an employee of or otherwise paid by or acting as an agent of, including, but not limited to, a municipal police department or the Division of State Police within the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection;
In Sec.
(7) "Public agency" has the same meaning as provided in section 1- of the general statutes;
3.
(8) "Reproductive health care services" has the same meaning as provided in section 52-571m of the general statutes;
"deadly force" was changed to "deadly physical force" for accuracy.
and (9) "State facility" means any building, or part thereof, owned, leased, occupied, controlled by or used for business by an office or agency of the Executive Department, Legislative Branch or Judicial Branch, either directly or indirectly, including, but not limited to, entities providing direct services on behalf of offices or agencies, but not including state- owned property leased to a federal entity.
JUD Joint Favorable Subst.
"State facility" includes the grounds of such facility and any garages or parking lots utilized in the Public Act No.
sSB397 / File No.
26-14 27 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 20 sSB397 File No.
397 operation of such facility, irrespective of whether such garages or parking lots are contiguous to the facility.
399 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
(b) (1) On and after October 1, 2026, no public agency or private vendor under contract with a public agency may operate an automated license plate reader system or use automated license plate reader data, except as follows:
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
(A) A public agency or a private vendor under contract with a public agency may operate an automated license plate reader system or use automated license plate reader data for the following purposes:
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
(i) Performing weigh station duties;
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
(ii) monitoring or maintaining the agency's vehicles or equipment;
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $ Judicial Dept.
(iii) assisting in the control of access to a secured area;
(Probation) GF - Potential Minimal Minimal Cost Resources of the General Fund GF - Potential Minimal Minimal Revenue Gain Note:
(iv) conducting traffic analytics;
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
(v) enforcing parking regulations and collecting fines, including (I) by a municipal parking authority pursuant to chapter 100 of the general statutes, or (II) on the grounds of any facility owned or operated by any other public agency and any garages or parking lots utilized in the operation of such facility, irrespective of whether such garages or parking lots are contiguous to thefacility;(vi)monitoringandsecuringstatefacilities;or(vii)enforcing motor vehicle tax compliance pursuant to section 14-33 and chapter 203 of the general statutes;
None Explanation Sections 1 and 2 create a new cause of action and allow the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) to bring a civil or administrative action for certain violations of a person's constitutional rights resulting in no fiscal impact to the state.
and (B) A law enforcement agency or a private vendor under contract with a law enforcement agency may operate an automated license plate reader system or use automated license plate reader data for the following purposes:
The OAG has the resources and expertise to meetthe requirements of the bill.
(i) Comparing such data with (I) data contained in a hotlist or internal hotlist addendum, (II) records of the Connecticut Online Law Enforcement Communications Teleprocessing System, (III) data contained in the Federal Bureau of Investigations Kidnapping and Missing Persons list, (IV) data contained in the Connecticut Criminal Justice Information System, (V) data contained in the Federal Terrorist Screening Database, (VI) data contained in the National Crime Information Center database, or (VII) data contained in the National Public Act No.
The court system disposes of over 250,000 cases annually and the number of cases is not anticipated to be great enough to need additional resources.
26-14 28 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
Sections 3 and 4, which allow the Division of Criminal Justice (DCJ) and the Office of Inspector General (OIG) to access certain evidence and scenes of investigation, is not anticipated to result in a fiscal impact as DCJ and OIG have the capacity and expertise to conduct these investigations.
397 Center for Missing and Exploited Children database;
Section 5 (1) prohibits peace officers from wearing a facial covering or personal disguise in certain circumstances and (2) requires peace officers to be clearly identified by their badge and name tag.
or (ii) entering a license plate number into an automated license plate reader system upon a law enforcement officer's determination that data in the system may (I) be relevant and material to a specific active investigation of a criminal offense in which there is reasonable suspicion that the offense has been or is being committed, provided any access by an officer of automated license plate reader data for such purpose shall result in a record of the reason for the access and any associated case number for the complaint or incident that is being investigated and is the basis for the access, (II) assist in the apprehension of an individual with an outstanding warrant, (III) assist in locating a missing or endangered individual, or (IV) assist in the recovery of a stolen motor vehicle.
Violations of these provisions is a class D Misdemeanor, resulting in a potential cost to the Judicial Department for probation and a potential revenue sSB397 / File No.
(2) (A) On and after October 1, 2026, except as provided in subparagraph (B) or (C) of this subdivision, any automated license plate reader data collected or otherwise acquired or held or stored by a public agency or by a private vendor under contract with a public agency shall not beretained for a period in excess of twenty-one days, or for ashorter period when required pursuant to the terms of a contract between a public agency with a private vendor that accesses an automated license plate reader system or holds or stores such data, unless such data is being retained (i) pursuant to a warrant or court order issued by a judge or magistrate on behalf of the state or federal judicial branches, or pursuant to court rules governing the preservation of evidence, (ii) for the purpose of collecting highway usage fees if such fees exist, provided such data is deleted not later than thirty days following the collection of such fees, (iii) as evidence in an active criminal investigation or prosecution, provided (I) at the time such data is designated for retention, such retention is approved by a supervisory law enforcement officer and documented by the law enforcement agency in a record stating the purpose for such retention and any associated case number for the investigation or prosecution to which the data relates, and (II) such data is deleted upon the conclusion of the investigation if no Public Act No.
399 21 sSB397 File No.
26-14 29 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 gain to the General Fund from fines.
397 criminal charges are filed, or, in the case of a conviction for which no defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, upon the final disposition of the criminal case to which the data relates, including the exhaustion of all direct appeals, whichever occurs first, or, in the case of a conviction for which a defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, upon the release the last defendant serving a term of imprisonment for a conviction to which the data relates, unless otherwise required to be retained under subparagraph (A)(i) of this subdivision, or (iv) for the purpose of conducting traffic analytics pursuant to subparagraph (A)(iv) of subdivision (1) of this subsection, provided such data is held or stored or managed as de-identified, aggregated or summarized data.
On average, the marginal cost for supervision in the community is less than $600 each year for adults and $450 each year for juveniles.
(B) A public agency or a private vendor under contract with a public agency may hold or retain automated license plate reader data for a period in excess of twenty-one days, if such data may be necessary to establishthatthecommissionofapotentialfutureoffense,motorvehicle violation or infraction pursuant to an ordinance, the general statutes or a regulation is a subsequent offense, motor vehicle violation or infraction for which a penalty prescribed for such subsequent offense, motor vehicle violation or infraction exceeds the penalty for the previous offense, motor vehicle violation or infraction.
Section 6, which prohibits an armed military force from another state, territory, or district from entering Connecticut for military duty here without the Governor's permission, results in no fiscal impact to the state.
(C) Any data collected pursuant to clause (vii) of subparagraph (A) of subdivision (1) of this subsection may be held or retained for a period in excess of twenty-one days, if such data is being held or retained expressly for the purpose of ensuring an individual's compliance with a municipality's motor vehicle tax laws, provided (i) such data is not shared with any entity or individual other than the municipality's tax assessor or the individual to whom the motor vehicle is registered, and (ii) such data is deleted after ninety days, or following a determination of compliance by the municipality's tax assessor, whichever occurs first.
Section 7, which prohibits peace officers, from detaining, arresting, or taking someone into custody based on a civil offense in certain locations unless the officer (1) is acting in his or her official capacity and (2) has a judicial warrant for the individual, results in no fiscal impact to the state or municipalities.
(c) Automated license plate reader data may be admissible as Public Act No.
Section 8 makes changes to the Police Officer Standards and Training Council (POST-C) comparative certification process and does not have a fiscal impact because POST-C has the existing expertise to implement these changes.
26-14 30 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
Section 9, which expands liability for certain actions to apply to the employers of all federal law enforcement officers, does not result in a fiscal impact to the state.
397 evidence in any court of this state, provided such data was collected or otherwise acquired or held or stored in accordance with the provisions of this section or obtained pursuant to a warrant issued by a judge of the Superior Court.
Section 10, which limits prosecutorial immunity for federal officers and employees, results in no fiscal impact to the state.
(d) On and after October 1, 2026, no public agency operating an automated license plate reader system or using automated license plate reader data pursuant to subsection (b) of this section may:
Section 11, which prohibits law enforcement units from hiring peace officers who (1) were dismissed for malfeasance or serious misconduct calling into question the fitness to serve as an officer or (2) resigned or retired during an investigation for this conduct, results in no fiscal impact to the state or municipalities.
(1) Use or assist in the use of automated license plate reader data to monitor or investigate an individual based on such individual's actual or perceived race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, sex, pregnancy status, disability, citizenship, nationality or income level, or perceived criminal history, except in a case where an individual is being investigated for a potential criminal offense for which an element of such offense is a prior conviction;
1Probation marginal cost is based on services provided by private providers and only includes costs that increase with each additional participant.
(2) Use or assist in the use of an automated license plate reader data system or automated license plate reader data for the purpose of identifying an individual engaged in an activity protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution;
This does not include a cost for additional supervision by a probation officer unless a new offense is anticipated to result in enough additional offenders to require additional probation officers.
(3) Use or assist in the use of an automated license plate reader data system or automated license plate reader data for the purpose of investigating a suspected immigration violation or otherwise assisting in any civil or criminal immigration enforcement activity;
sSB397 / File No.
(4) Use or assist in the use of an automated license plate reader data system or automated license plate reader data for the purpose of investigating or prosecuting any individual who has sought, received, or provided reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services that are permitted under the laws of this state;
399 22 sSB397 File No.
(5) Unless authorized pursuant to section 29-6d of the general statutes, collect automated license plate reader data from a fixed Public Act No.
399 The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the number of offenses and fines imposed under section 5.
26-14 31 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
sSB397 / File No.
397 automated license plate reader system on the premises or within a distance established by the Police Officer Standards and Training Council pursuant to section 14 of this act, of a reproductive or sexual health facility, as defined in section 42-515 of the general statutes, that primarily provides gender-affirming health care services that are permitted under the laws of this state or a nonprofit or community organization that primarily serves immigrant communities, excluding any property under federal jurisdiction, provided such facility or organization notified the Police Officer Standards and Training Council of such facility's or organization's location;
399 23 sSB397 File No.
(6) Share or provide access to automated license plate reader data, unless the individual or entity requesting such data or access is (A) a public agency of this state, (B) a law enforcement agency of the state of New York or Rhode Island or the Commonwealth of Massachusetts or a municipality of said states or commonwealth or a multijurisdictional task force of which a public agency of this state is a participating member, provided (i) such requesting law enforcement agency or task force provides a written declaration affirming that any data received will be used in compliance with the prohibitions set forth in this section, and will not be used for an immigration investigation or enforcement action or to investigate or prosecute any individual who has sought, received or provided reproductive health care services or gender- affirming health care services that are permitted under the laws of this state and will not be further disclosed except as permitted under the laws of this state, and (ii) in the case of a multijurisdictional task force, such specific data requested is approved by the head of such task force or such head's designee and is directly and reasonably relevant to a specific investigation of such task force, (C) any other law enforcement agency other than those of this state or described in subparagraph (B) of this subdivision, including any federal law enforcement agency, if such requesting law enforcement agency has a judicially issued probable cause warrant for the specific data requested, or is requesting specific Public Act No.
399 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 397 AN ACT CONCERNING DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY.
26-14 32 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
397 data on an individual identified as a possible match in the Federal Terrorist Screening Database, or (D) an individual requesting data regarding a motor vehicle registered in such individual's name, provided if a motor vehicle has more than one owner, lessor or regular user, all such owners, lessors and regular users join in the request and are natural persons;
SUMMARY §§ 1 & 2 — ACTIONS FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS Creates an individual cause of action, including against a federal or state officer or employee, for alleged civil rights violations;
(7) Participate in a system or network that shares automated license plate reader data, or provide to, or access such data through any multistate, intrastate or national data-sharing system or network unless such system or network requires, as a condition of participation in or access to such system or network, execution of a written declaration by each participant affirming that:
expands the attorney general’s authority to bring actions based on alleged civil rights violations §§ 3 & 4 — USE OF FORCE INVESTIGATIONS Expands the circumstances under which there is an investigation of a peace officer’s use of physical force that results in the person’s death or the death of a person in a peace officer’s custody, by also requiring an investigation under these circumstances when the officer is any federal law enforcement officer;
(A) Any data shared, accessed or otherwise acquired will be used solely in compliance with this section and other laws of this state;
requires that the investigators have unrestricted access to the scene and to collect evidence in this use of force investigation § 5 — PROHIBITED FACIAL COVERINGS Prohibits, subject to several exceptions, peace officers from wearing a facial covering or personal disguise when interacting with the public and performing law enforcement duties;
and (B) such participant will not share or use such data, except in compliance with the provisions of this section;
makes a violation a class D misdemeanor § 5 — BADGE AND NAME TAG IDENTIFICATION Generally requires peace officers to be clearly identified by their badge and name tag when enforcing laws and makes a violation a class D misdemeanor § 6 — ARMED MILITARY FORCES ENTERING CONNECTICUT Generally prohibits armed miliary forces from other states,territories, or districts from coming to Connecticut for military duty sSB397 / File No.
and (8) Permit a public agency to have real-time, bulk or automatic access to automated license plate reader data, unless such data is in response to a documented, case-specific request and the sharing of such data is not otherwise prohibited under this subsection.
399 24 sSB397 File No.
(e) (1) Automated license plate reader data is confidential and shall not be deemed a public record for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act, as defined in section 1-200 of the general statutes.
399 § 7 — TAKING INTO CUSTODY IN STATE OR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES OR PROTECTED AREAS Prohibits peace officers taking someone into custody on the basis of a civil offense in a state or municipal facility or certain other locations such as schools, hospitals, and houses of worship (“protected areas”) without a judicial warrant for the person § 8 — POST COMPARATIVE CERTIFICATIONS Codifies POST regulations on getting a comparative certification to work as a police officer in Connecticut § 9 — OFFICER INTERFERENCE WITH PHOTO OR VIDEO TAKING Makes federal law enforcement agencies liable when their officers interfere with someone taking a photo, digital still, or video of them or another officer performing their duties;
(2) The following are not confidential and are deemed public records forthepurposesoftheFreedomofInformationAct,asdefinedinsection 1-200 of the general statutes:
makes an immunity defense unavailable in a civil liability action for an intentional tort committed while interfering with the taking of the photo, digital still, or video § 10 — PROSECUTORIAL IMMUNITY FOR FEDERAL ACTIONS Limits the circumstances under which a federal officer, employee, or agent has immunity when prosecuted for an offense based on an action taken under color of law § 11 — POLICE OFFICER HIRING PROHIBITION Extends to all peace officers the current prohibition on hiring police officers who (1) were dismissed for malfeasance or serious misconduct or (2) resigned or retired during an investigation for this conduct BACKGROUND SUMMARY This bill makes various changes to laws related to civil rights and law enforcement activity, as shown in the section-by-section analysis below.
(A)Locationsofanystillorvideoimagerecordingdeviceusedaspart of an automated license plate reader system, except such data is confidential and not deemed public records if the purchase of the still or Public Act No.
It also makes technical and conforming changes.
26-14 33 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
397 video image recording device was funded in whole or in part by the United States Department of Homeland Security and such funding was conditioned on the location of such device not being disclosed;
Upon passage §§ 1 & 2 — ACTIONS FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS Creates an individual cause of action, including against a federal or state officer or employee, for alleged civil rights violations;
and (B) Any data derived from any audit of an automated license plate reader system, usage logs for such system and logs detailing access to automated license plate reader data, provided any such data disclosable under this subsection has all automated license plate reader data redacted from otherwise disclosable data.
expands the attorney general’s authority to bring actions based on alleged civil rights violations Individual Cause of Action sSB397 / File No.
(3) Any person who seeks to obtain automated license plate reader data concerning a motor vehicle that was registered in such person's name at the time of the creation of such data may obtain such data from the contracting public agency, provided if such motor vehicle is also registered in another person's name, such person also consents to such disclosure.
399 25 sSB397 File No.
(f) Not later than January 1, 2027, a public agency, other than a law enforcement agency, that operates an automated license plate reader system or uses automated license plate reader data shall adopt and publicize a written automated license plate reader system usage and privacy policy prior to using or acquiring an automated license plate reader system or automated license plate reader data.
399 Scope of Action.
Such policy shall comply with all applicable provisions of this section and include safeguards and standards substantially equivalent to those required under the model policy adopted under section 14 of this act.
The bill creates a cause of action (in court or another proper proceeding) against an individual or entity, including a federal or state officer or employee, that deprives or causes a Connecticut citizen or someone within the state’s jurisdiction to be deprived of a U.S.
(g) On and after the effective date of this section, no public agency shall enter into or renew any contract with a private vendor related to automated license plate reader system usage or automated license plate reader data, unless such contract provides that the private vendor shall not engage in any of the following activities with respect to any automated license plate reader data collected in this state, notwithstanding any terms of service, including, but not limited to, Public Act No.
Constitutionally-protected right, privilege, or immunity.
26-14 34 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
This can occur by taking actions under color of United States or Connecticut statute, regulation, ordinance, custom, or usage.
397 terms or conditions of use, use agreements or policies or procedures maintained by a private vendor, that are incorporated by reference or otherwise into the contract:
The bill states that it is the legislature’s intent that courts, when considering this action, must be guided by other courts’ interpretations of the law that allows individuals to sue state or local government officials for federal constitutional rights violations (42 U.S.C.
(1) Sell such automated license plate reader data;
§ 1983).
(2) Share or transfer such automated license plate reader data with or to any third party, without receiving the prior express written authorization of the contracting public agency for the sharing or transferring of such data for a specific purpose;
Defenses.
(3) Allow any personother thanthe contracting agency to access such automated license plate reader data, unless the private vendor is required to allow such person to access such automated license plate reader data pursuant to a warrant or court order issued by a judge or magistrate on behalf of the state or federal judicial branches.
The bill (1) allows the defendant in a civil action to raise any applicable immunities, including sovereign immunity, given by state or federal law and (2) immunizes federal officers and employees to the same extent the law does for equivalent state officers or employees (such as personal immunity from civil liability for damage caused when discharging duties or within the scope of employment unless an action was wanton, reckless, or malicious).
As used in this subdivision, "warrant or court order" excludes any subpoena or demand of a grand jury investigation;
Damages.
(4) Share or transfer such automated license plate reader data, or allow access to such automated license plate reader data, if the private vendor reasonably believes that such automated license plate reader data may be used for purposes of (A) investigating any suspected immigration violation or otherwise assisting in any immigration enforcement activity, (B) investigating any suspected, or prosecuting any alleged person or persons for, (i) seeking, providing or receiving reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services that are permitted under the laws of this state, or (ii) assisting another individual who is seeking, providing or receiving reproductive health care services or gender-affirming health care services that are permitted under the laws of this state, including, but not limited to, providing information, transportation, lodging or material support to such other individual, or (C) any effort to identify, or impose any civil or criminal liability on, any person based solely on such person's Public Act No.
The bill allows the court to award damages, including nominal, actual, compensatory, or punitive damages, injunctive relief, or other equitable relief.
26-14 35 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
It specifies that the purpose of the damage award is to protect peaceable exercise or enjoyment of rights given by the U.S.
397 participation in any activity that is protected by the United States Constitution or the Constitution of the state of Connecticut, including, but not limited to, any exercise of such person's right to freedom of speech, to peaceably assemble or to petition the government for a redress of grievances, except as otherwise provided by applicable state or federal law;
Constitution.
or (5) Hold or store the contracting public agency's automated license plate reader data (A) with the automated license plate reader data held or stored pursuant to a contract with a different public agency concerning automated license plate reader data or any such data held or stored pursuant to a contract with any other person concerning such data, or (B) in a manner that is not in accordance with industry- recognized data security practices, including, but not limited to, using encryption when transmitting or storing such data.
The bill requires the court to award the plaintiff reasonable attorney’s fees and costs in amounts at its discretion.
(h) On and after the effective date of this section, no public agency shall enter into or renew any contract with a private vendor related to automated license plate reader system usage or automated license plate reader data, unless such contract provides that the private vendor consents to personal jurisdiction in this state in the event of any legal proceeding and contains a choice of law provision that states that Connecticut state law shall be the controlling law for the contract.
Attorney General Authority to Bring an Action Practice, Pattern of Conduct, Policy.
(i) The Attorney General may bring an action against any private vendor with which a public agency contracts, if that private vendor is engaged in any conduct identified in subdivisions (1) to (5), inclusive, of subsection (g) of this section or subsection (h) of this section with respect to any automated license plate reader data collected in this state.
Existing law gives the state attorney general the authority to investigate, intervene in, and bring civil or administrative actions on behalf of the state when there is a practice or pattern of conduct that:
In any action instituted under this subsection, the court may grant appropriate relief, including, but not limited to, injunctive or declaratory relief, damages and any other relief that may be available under law.
1.
If the Attorney General prevails in an action brought pursuant to this section, the court shall order the distribution of any Public Act No.
deprives persons of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured sSB397 / File No.
26-14 36 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 26 sSB397 File No.
397 awardofdamagesto any injuredperson.The court may also awardcivil penalties against each defendant in an amount not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars for each violation.
399 by the U.S.
Any civil penalty that is received pursuant to this subsection shall be deposited in the General Fund.
or Connecticut constitutions or laws or 2.
(j) On and after October 1, 2026, a public agency may be subject to an action by any aggrieved individual for injunctive or declaratory relief, including a determination of past violations, if an officer, employee or other individual otherwise paid by or acting as an agent of such agency violates any provision of subsection (b), (d) or (e) of this section.
interferes by threats, intimidation, or coercion, with another persons’ exercise or enjoyment of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the U.S.
If the alleged violation that forms the basis of an action under this subsection is committed by a private vendor with which a public agency contracts, or if that private vendor is engaged in any conduct identified in subdivisions (1) to (5), inclusive, of subsection (g) of this section with respect to any automated license plate reader data collected in this state, the private vendor shall be liable for such violation, rather than the public agency.
or Connecticut constitutions or laws.
Such action may be brought in the superior court for the judicial district in which the aggrieved individual resides.
The bill broadens the attorney general’s authority to take these actions on behalf of the state by also allowing him to do so when any one has established a policy that deprives or interferes with another person’s civil rights in the ways described above.
If an aggrieved individual prevails and an order of injunctive relief is issued, such aggrieved individual may be entitled to recover court costs and reasonable attorney's fees associated only with an action or that portion of an action concerning a request and order for injunctive relief.
Actions Under Color of Law or Custom.
An action under this subsection shall be privileged with respect to assignment for trial.
The bill also expands the attorney general’s authority to investigate, intervene in, or bring an action by allowing him to do so when someone acts under the appearance of authority from a United States or Connecticut statute, regulation, ordinance, custom, or usage (“color of law”) in a way that:
(k) Any law enforcement officer who is found to have knowingly accessed, usedordisseminatedautomatedlicenseplatereaderdatawith malicious intent for purposes outside of the provisions of this section shall be subject to disciplinary action including, but not limited to, suspension, cancellation or revocation of certification by the Police Officer Standards and Training Council pursuant to section 7-294d of the general statutes, as amended by this act.
1.
Public Act No.
deprives another person of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the U.S.
26-14 37 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
or Connecticut constitutions or 2.
397 (l) If a law enforcement agency of this state suspects that a law enforcement agency of another state or a federal law enforcement agency may have used any automated license plate reader data shared with such agency in any manner prohibited by this section, such law enforcement agency ofthisstate shallnotify thePolice Officer Standards and Training Council of such suspected prohibited use.
interferes by physical obstruction, threats, intimidation, or coercion, with another person’s exercise or enjoyment of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the U.S.
The Police Officer Standards and Training Council shall determine whether automated license plate reader data was used in a prohibited manner by the law enforcement agency of another state or federal law enforcement agency, as applicable, and, if so determined, direct each law enforcement agency in this state to discontinue sharing such data or providing access to such data with or to such other law enforcement agency.
or Connecticut constitutions.
Sec.
Court Process.
14.
For the bill’s new actions based on acts done under the appearance of authority, the attorney general may bring the action in the Superior Court for the judicial district where the violation or alleged violation occurred.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) (a) Not later than December 1, 2026, the Police Officer Standards and Training Council shall adopt a model policy governing law enforcement agency acquisition and use of automated license plate reader systems and automated license plate reader data.
The bill requires the court to have a hearing on the complaint within five days after its filing, and the attorney general to notify the interested parties of its time and location.
Such policy shall direct agencies to act in accordance with section 13 of this act, including permissible and prohibited uses of such system and any automated license plate reader data, whether collected by such system or acquired otherwise.
The court may order declaratory relief (a statement of rights) or a temporary injunction once the complaint is filed.
In addition to detailing such permissible and prohibited uses of such system or data, such policy shall, at a minimum:
After the hearing, it may order, amend, or continue the relief or injunction.
(1) Develop standards for the use of a hotlist, including the sources from which a hotlist may be compiled, supervisory approval requirements for use and management of, access to and validation procedures for the data on any hotlist, including time limitationsfor theinclusionofsuchdataona hotlist,(2)providefor data retention limits in accordance with subdivision (2) of subsection (b) of section 13 of this act, (3) establish data access and sharing requirements in accordance with subsection (d) of section 13 of this act, including internal access controls and supervisory review and conditions under which such data may be shared with other public agencies or law Public Act No.
§§ 3 & 4 — USE OF FORCE INVESTIGATIONS sSB397 / File No.
26-14 38 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
399 27 sSB397 File No.
397 enforcement agencies, (4) provide for a supervisory responsibility and accountability structure, including designation of an officer or unit responsible for oversight of automated license plate reader system use and compliance with any policy adopted in accordance with the provisions of this section, (5) establish training requirements, including initial and periodic training for any officer or employee authorized to access the system or data, (6) establish audit and logging requirements, including the creation and retention of access logs sufficient to ensure compliance and facilitate independent review, of which the logs shall include documentation of access to and retention of automated license plate reader data pursuant to subdivision (2) of subsection (b) of section of this act, including, but not limited to, (A) the number of times such data is retained, and (B) the duration of such retention, and require that such audits be conducted not less than quarterly, (7) establish public transparency standards and requirements, including publication of agency-specific usage policies for an automated license plate reader system and annual statistical reports detailing such usage, (8) establish the distance described in subdivision (5) of subsection (d) of section 13 of this act, and (9) contain provisions concerning compliance with subsection (g) of section 13 of this act concerning contracting with private vendors for services associated with access to an automated license plate reader system or storage of, processing of, transmission of or access to automated license plate reader data.
399 Expands the circumstances under which there is an investigation of a peace officer’s use of physical force that results in the person’s death or the death of a person in a peace officer’s custody, by also requiring an investigation under these circumstances when the officer is any federal law enforcement officer;
(b) Not later than January 1, 2027, each law enforcement agency shall adopt and implement the policy developed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, or a policy that provides greater privacy protections than that which are in the policy developed pursuant to said subsection (a).
requires that the investigators have unrestricted access to the scene and to collect evidence in this use of force investigation By law, the Division of Criminal Justice (DCJ) must investigate whenever a peace officer, while performing his or her duties, uses physical force on someone that causes that person’s death or uses deadly force (a type of physical force) on another person.
Such policy shall be in effect until regulations are adopted pursuant to this section, at which point such policy shall be supplanted by any such regulation.
The inspector general is responsible for determining if the use of force was justifiable.
(c)(1)Not later thanJanuary 1,2028,theCommissioner ofEmergency Public Act No.
Similarly, thelawrequirestheinspector generalto investigate any death that happened while the person was in the custody of peace officers or law enforcement agencies to determine if physical force was used on the person and if it was justifiable.
26-14 39 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
The law requires the inspector general to prosecute cases involving unjustifiable use of force by peace officers.
397 Services and Public Protection shall, in consultation with the Police Officer Standards and Training Council, adopt regulations, in accordance with the provisions of chapter 54 of the general statutes, to enact a policy that, at a minimum, satisfies the provisions of subdivisions (1) to (9), inclusive, of subsection (a) of this section and section 13 of this act.
Broadened Authority to Include Federal Officers The bill expands the above investigatory and prosecutorial authority by applying it to the actions of any federal law enforcement officer.
(2) Not later than January 1, 2033, and at least once during each five- year period thereafter, the commissioner shall, in consultation with the Police Officer Standards and Training Council, adopt regulations in accordance with the provisions of chapter 54 of the general statutes.
It does this by including a broader definition of “peace officer” within this investigatory statute than what currently applies (seeBackground — Peace Officer).
Suchregulationsshall(A)complywiththeprovisionsofthissectionand section 13 of this act and shall not reduce or limit the protections affordedby saidsectionsor any minimumstandardsestablishedby said sections, and (B) be based on a consideration of any changes in law, technology andbest practicessince the previousadoptionofregulations pursuant to this section.
Under current law, this investigatory authority over federal officers is limited to marshals and deputy marshals and narcotics agents.
(3) Any regulation adopted pursuant to this section shall be binding upon all law enforcement agencies.
The bill instead applies it to “federal law enforcement officers,” as defined under two federal laws.
Sec.
Specifically, they include any:
15.
1.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) (a) Not later than January 1, 2027, the Police Officer Standards and Training Council, in consultation with the Commissioner of Emergency Services and Public Protection and the Institute for Municipal and Regional Policy at The University of Connecticut, shall develop and promulgate a standardized form for reporting automated license plate reader system usage, including, but not limited to, (1) the number of (A) license plates scanned, (B) searches performed by the law enforcement agency as a result of automated license plate reader system use and the reason for any such search, (C) times automated license plate reader data was shared with or accessed by another entity, the identity of each of thoseentities and the reasonfor sharing the data, (D) times automated license plate reader data was shared or accessed pursuant to a judicial warrant, (E) instances, if any, Public Act No.
officer, agent, or employee who the law or a government agency authorizes to prevent, detect, investigate, or prosecute a federal crime (or supervise these actions) (18 U.S.C.
26-14 40 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
§ 115(c)(1)) or 2.
397 when data was retained longer than permissible pursuant to subdivision (2) of subsection (b) of section 13 of this act, (F) instances, if any, when data was requested to be collected at locations described in subdivision (5) of subsection (d) of section 13 of this act, and (G) times that data is accessed or requested on or after the fourteenth day after such data is collected, and (2) any changes to the law enforcement agency's data collection, retention or sharing policies that affect privacy of automated license plate reader data.
employee, including an Amtrak or Federal Reserve law enforcement officer, authorized by law to make arrests or apprehensions and by the employing agency to carry firearms, who mainly (a) prevents, detects, investigates, prosecutes, or assists in the incarceration of someone who violates the law (or supervises these actions) or (b) protects government officials sSB397 / File No.
(b) Each law enforcement agency shall, not later than January thirty- first following a calendar year during which the law enforcement agency used an automated license plate reader system pursuant to subsection (b) of section 13 of this act, submit a report detailing such usage to the Institute for Municipal and Regional Policy at The University of Connecticut using the standardized form promulgated pursuant to subsection (a) of this section and publish such report on the law enforcement agency's Internet web site.
399 28 sSB397 File No.
(c) Not later than January thirty-first of each year, any public agency, other than a law enforcement agency, that uses an automated license plate reader system pursuant to subsection (b) of section 13 of this act, shall publish on the agency's Internet web site an annual report containing the information described in subsection (a) of this section as it pertains to such agency for the previous calendar year.
399 against personal safety threats (34 U.S.C.
(d) Not later than July 30, 2027, and annually thereafter, the Institute for Municipal and Regional Policy at The University of Connecticut shall compile, analyze and summarize the reports submitted pursuant to subsections (b) and (c) of this section and shall submit, in accordance with section 11-4a of the general statutes, a consolidated report regarding automated license plate reader system usage and any recommendations for legislation to the Governor and the joint standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to public safety and the judiciary.
§ 50301(5)).
Public Act No.
Correspondingly, the bill applies this broader definition of “peace officer” to the existing law that sets the standards for determining if use of physical force is justifiable.
26-14 41 of 42 Substitute Senate Bill No.
Access to Evidence As part of these use of force investigations, existing law requires the inspector generaltoask theappropriate lawenforcement agency forany help needed to investigate and determine use of force.
397 Governor's Action:
The bill specifies that (1) the DCJ and the inspector general must have unrestricted access to the scene and to collect evidence as part of these investigations and (2) this right to access applies even if the only peace officers involved in the incident were federal government employees.
Approved May 4, 2026 Public Act No.
The bill allows DCJ or the inspector general to seek injunctive relief in Superior Court against anyone who restricts their access to the scene and to collect evidence.
26-14 42 of 42
Under the bill, the court may order declaratory relief (a statement of rights) or a temporary injunction once the DCJ’s or inspector general’s complaint is filed.
The court must have a hearing on the complaint within five days after its filing, and the complainant (DCJ or the inspector general) must notify the interested parties of the hearing’s time and location.
The court may then order, amend, or continue any declaratory relief or temporary injunction.
Background — Peace Officer Current law designates the following people as peace officers for purposes of the state’s Penal Code and associated statutes:
state and local police, DCJ inspectors, state marshals exercising statutory powers, judicial marshals performing their duties, conservation or special conservation officers, constables who have criminal law enforcement duties, appointed special police officers, adult probation officers, Department of Correction officials authorized to make arrests in a correctional institution or facility, investigators in the State Treasurer’s Office, certified Department of Motor Vehicles inspectors, U.S.
marshals sSB397 / File No.
399 29 sSB397 File No.
399 and deputy marshals, U.S.
special agents authorized to enforce federal food and drug laws, and certified police officers of a law enforcement unit created and governed under a state-tribal memorandum (CGS § 53a-3(9)).
§ 5 — PROHIBITED FACIAL COVERINGS Prohibits, subject to several exceptions, peace officers from wearing a facial covering or personal disguise when interacting with the public and performing law enforcement duties;
makes a violation a class D misdemeanor Prohibited Wearing The bill prohibits, subject to several exceptions, peace officers engaged in law enforcement activities from wearing a facial covering or personaldisguisewheninteractingwiththepublicandperformingtheir duties.
Peace officers include federal law enforcement officers, as is the case for use of force investigations under the bill (see §§ 3 & 4 above).
A violation of the ban on the use of facial covering and personal disguise is a class D misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $250, up to 30 days in prison, or both.
Additionally, an officer who intentionally assaults, batters, falsely imprisons or arrests, abuses process, or maliciously prosecutes someone (under state or federal law), while knowingly and willfully violating the ban, is unable to use a privilege or immunity defense against a civil liability claim about the officer’s actions.
Under the bill, a “facial covering” is an item that conceals or obscures an officer’s facial identity, such as opaque masks, garments, helmets, or headgear.
Specific examples include balaclavas, tactical masks, gators, and ski masks.
“Personal disguise” is undefined.
Exempted Coverings and Uses The bill allows peace officers to use a medical grade facial covering designed to protect their health and safety but specifies that this does not include protecting an officer’s identity.
It also allows them to use facial coverings designed to (1) prevent airborne disease transmission or (2) protect against smoke exposure during a fire.
Other exempt facial coverings are those:
sSB397 / File No.
399 30 sSB397 File No.
399 1.
needed for a water rescue operation, 2.
that protect against biological or chemical agent exposure during an incident where there may be an agent, 3.
that protect against freezing temperatures during an activity that does not require communicating orally with the public or someone that will be placed in custody, or 4.
needed for an active undercover operation or other assignment for which supervising personnel or a court order allow them to be worn.
The bill also allows officers working on a bomb squad, motorcycle unit, or specialized weapons and tactics team to use gear necessary to protect their face and head from physical harm.
§ 5 — BADGE AND NAME TAG IDENTIFICATION Generally requires peace officers to be clearly identified by their badge and name tag when enforcing laws and makes a violation a class D misdemeanor The bill generally requires peace officers (as the bill defines for purposes of use of force investigations, see §§ 3 & 4 above) to be clearly identified by their badge and name tag.
The badge and tag must be (1) on the officer’s uniform whenever the officer is enforcing any state or federal law and (2) worn following existing badge and name tag requirements for police officers.
By law, police officers must already affix and prominently display their badge and name tag on their uniform’s outermost garment, unless exempt under the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection’s (DESPP’s) model policy on badges and name tags, such as for undercover assignments.
The bill similarly exempts a peace officer from the badge and name tag requirement when (1) the officer is working an active undercover assignment or (2) a court order or DESPP’s model policy excuses it.
A violation of the ban is a class D misdemeanor, which is punishable by a fine of up to $250, up to 30 days in prison, or both.
sSB397 / File No.
399 31 sSB397 File No.
399 § 6 — ARMED MILITARY FORCES ENTERING CONNECTICUT Generally prohibits armed miliary forces from other states, territories, or districts from coming to Connecticut for military duty The bill generally prohibits an armed military force from another state, territory, or district from entering Connecticut for military duty here.
To enter the state, the bill requires the military force to have (1) express written permission from this state’s governor or (2) been called into active service of the United States and to be acting under presidential authority.
§ 7 — TAKING INTO CUSTODY IN STATE OR MUNICIPAL FACILITIES OR PROTECTED AREAS Prohibits peace officers taking someone into custody on the basis of a civil offense in a state or municipal facility or certain other locations such as schools, hospitals, and houses of worship (“protected areas”) without a judicial warrant for the person The bill prohibits peace officers, from detaining, arresting, or taking someone into custody based on a civil offense in certain locations unless the officer (1) is acting in his or her official capacity and (2) has a judicial warrant for the person.
Officers subject to the prohibition are those covered by the bill’s expanded definition of “peace officer” for use of force investigations, which includes broader applicability to federal law enforcement (see §§ 3 & 4 above).
Underthebill,someoneaggrievedbyaviolationofthebanmaybring a civil action in Superior Court, and an action seeking damages is triable by jury.
The bill allows the court to award a plaintiff appropriate legal and equitable relief, such as a temporary or permanent injunction, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees and costs.
Prohibited Custody Locations State or Municipal Facilities.
State or municipal facilities are buildings owned, leased, occupied, controlled, or used for business by an executive department office or agency or municipal government and entities that provide direct services on their behalf.
This includes the groundsandgaragesorparkinglotsthatareusedaspartofthefacilities’ operation, regardless of whether they are contiguous (in contact with one another), but not state-owned property leased to a federal entity.
sSB397 / File No.
399 32 sSB397 File No.
399 Protected Areas.
The bill’s protection from being taken into custody incertainareasapplies to thefollowing buildingsor locations,including their grounds and garages or parking lots that are used as part of their operation, regardless of whether they are contiguous:
1.
schools, ranging from preschools to colleges or universities;
2.
medical or mental heath facilities, such as hospitals, doctors’ offices, vaccination or testing sites, or community health centers;
3.
places of worship or religious study, either in a structure dedicated to faith activities or a temporary facility or other location where the activities occur;
4.
social services establishments, such as crisis centers, shelters, supervised visitation or family justice centers, victim services centers, food banks or pantries, or substance counseling and treatment facilities;
5.
places for disaster or emergency response and relief, including supply distribution sites, to register for disaster-related assistance, or to be reunited with family;
6.
places where religious or civil ceremonies or observances occur, such as for funerals, graveside services, or weddings;
7.
places where children gather, such as playgrounds, recreation or child care centers, school bus stops, or group homes for children;
and 8.
places with ongoing parades, demonstrations, or rallies.
§ 8 — POST COMPARATIVE CERTIFICATIONS Codifies POST regulations on getting a comparative certification to work as a police officer in Connecticut The bill codifies Police Officer Standards and Training Council (POST) regulations on certifying candidates for police officer positions who served that role in another state or in a law enforcement unit in sSB397 / File No.
399 33 sSB397 File No.
399 Connecticut that is not subject to POST’s authority (a “comparative certification”).
Like existing regulations, the bill generally requires candidates for this certification to (1) satisfactorily meet POST’s entry level requirements and (2) complete a POST-approved basic training program.
The bill allows POST to waive the basic training program requirement or parts of it, but POST must specify which parts the candidate must complete.
However, beyond the regulations, the bill prohibits POST from waiving any part of the program for a candidate whose prior certification did not require completing a substantially equivalenttrainingoreducationprogram,includingatleast480training hours.
Under the bill and existing regulations, a waiver request must be made in writing by the (1) chief of police of the law enforcement unit seeking to hire the officer or (2) hiring candidate’s appointing authority if there is no chief of police or it involves hiring a chief.
POST must evaluate a waiver request by comparing to current standards the quality and extent of (1) previous police officer basic training and certification;
(2) formal, professional, and in-service training and education in law enforcement and criminal justice;
(3) length of service and field experience;
and (4) length of absence from employment with a law enforcement unit.
The waivable parts of the training are those for which the candidate has (1) satisfactorily completed a substantially equivalent training or educational program, (2) sufficient field experience to have practical mastery of the required skills, or (3) a satisfactory combination of the two.
§ 9 — OFFICER INTERFERENCE WITH PHOTO OR VIDEO TAKING Makes federal law enforcement agencies liable when their officers interfere with someone taking a photo, digital still, or video of them or another officer performing their duties;
sSB397 / File No.
399 34 sSB397 File No.
399 makes an immunity defense unavailable in a civil liability action for an intentional tort committed while interfering with the taking of the photo, digital still, or video Current law makes a peace officer’s employer liable if the officer interferes with someone taking a photo or digital still or video image of the officer or another officer performing his or her duties, subject to several exceptions.
But it exempts federal government special agents and specified tribes’ law enforcement unit members.
The bill generally applies its expanded definition of peace officer for inspector general use of force investigations (see §§ 3 & 4 above) to this provision, making the liability apply to the employers of all federal law enforcement officers, but keeping the exemption for tribal law enforcement.
Existing law exempts an employer from liability under certain specified circumstances, including when the officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the interference was to lawfully enforce a state criminal law or municipal ordinance.
The bill, conforming with its liability expansion to federal agencies, broadens the exemption to include lawful enforcement of a federal criminal law.
Additionally, if a peace officer intentionally assaults, batters, falsely imprisons or arrests, abuses process, or maliciously prosecutes (either under state or federal law) someone while interfering with someone taking a photo, digital still, or video of him- or herself or another officer, the officer is unable to use a privilege or immunity defense against a civil tort liability claim about the actions.
§ 10 — PROSECUTORIAL IMMUNITY FOR FEDERAL ACTIONS Limits the circumstances under which a federal officer, employee, or agent has immunity when prosecuted for an offense based on an action taken under color of law The bill limits circumstances under whicha federalofficer, employee, or agent has immunity when prosecuted for an offense based on an action taken under color of law (the appearance of authority from federal law).
Specifically, the immunity applies when the action was authorized by federal law and was necessary and proper to execute official duties.
sSB397 / File No.
399 35 sSB397 File No.
399 § 11 — POLICE OFFICER HIRING PROHIBITION Extends to all peace officers the current prohibition on hiring police officers who (1) were dismissed for malfeasance or serious misconduct or (2) resigned or retired during an investigation for this conduct The bill broadens the prohibition on a law enforcement unit (generally state or local police) from hiring a police officer who was previously employed by the unit or in another jurisdiction and (1) was dismissed for malfeasance or serious misconduct calling into question their fitness to serve as an officer or (2) resigned or retired during an investigation for this conduct.
It does this by replacing the term “police officer” with “peace officer” and in doing so applies the hiring prohibition to hiring peace officers.
Under the bill, as is the case for the inspector general’s expanded investigative authority, peace officers include all federal law enforcement officers and other state employees like state or judicial marshals and certain correctional employees (see §§ 3 & 4 above).
Currently, the prohibition covers hiring sworn members of organized local police departments, appointed constables with criminal law enforcement duties, special policemen appointed for state property or utility or transportation companies or to investigate public assistance fraud, and any member of a law enforcement unit who performs police duties.
As under existing law, the hiring prohibition does not apply to an officer exonerated of all malfeasance or serious misconduct allegations.
For purposes of the law and the bill, (1) “malfeasance” has its common meaning (wrongdoing), and (2) “serious misconduct” is an officer’s improper or illegal actions connected with official duties that could cause a miscarriage of justice or discrimination, such as a felony conviction, evidence fabrication, repeated use of excessive force, bribe acceptance, or fraud.
BACKGROUND Related Bills sSB 91, favorably reported by the Judiciary Committee, also (1) gives sSB397 / File No.
399 36 sSB397 File No.
399 the inspector general the investigatory authority over physical force incidents involving federal law enforcement officers and (2) restricts taking people into custody based on a civil offense in state or municipal facilities and protected areas.
sSB 463, §§ 1 & 8, and sHB 5533, §§ 1 & 8, favorably reported by the Government Administration and Elections Committee, among other things, (1) generally prohibit state and federal officers and agents from searching, detaining, or arresting people within 250 feet of an election site and (2) expand the state attorney general’s authority to investigate and bring actions for certain violations of civil rights, under state or federal law or constitutions, to include when someone has a policy that violates them.
HB 5428, favorably reported by the Judiciary Committee, among other things, limits the inspector general’s investigations of in custody deaths to those that occur in a peace officer’s or law enforcement agency’s physical custody.
COMMITTEE ACTION Judiciary Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 30 Nay 11 (03/23/2026) sSB397 / File No.
399 37
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE

  2. PUBLIC ACT 26-14

  3. SIGNED BY GOVERNOR IN ORIGINAL

  4. RULES SUSPENDED, TRANSMITTED TO THE GOVERNOR

  5. IN CONCURRENCE

  6. HOUSE PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A,B

  7. HOUSE ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A,B

  8. BILL PASSED TEMPORARILY

  9. HOUSE REJECTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. J

  10. HOUSE REJECTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. I

  11. HOUSE REJECTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. H

  12. HOUSE REJECTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. G

  13. HOUSE REJECTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. F

  14. HOUSE REJECTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. E

  15. HOUSE REJECTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. D

  16. HOUSE REJECTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. C

  17. HOUSE REJECTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. B

  18. HOUSE REJECTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  19. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 455

  20. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  21. SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A,B

  22. SEN. REJ. SEN. AMEND. SCH. C

  23. SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. B

  24. SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A

  25. FILE NO. 399

  26. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 245

  27. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  28. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  29. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/07/26

  30. FILED WITH LCO

  31. Joint Favorable Substitute

  32. PUBLIC HEARING 0309

  33. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

44 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on

Sponsors (44)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (143)

143 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 143 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 397?
SB 397 is sponsored by Anne M. Hughes (Democratic), Moira Rader (Democratic), Geoff Luxenberg (Democratic), Hector Arzeno (Democratic), Renee LaMark Muir (Democratic), Lucy Dathan (Democratic), Roland J. Lemar (Democratic), David DeFronzo (Democratic), Jonathan Jacobson (Democratic), Rebecca Martinez (Democratic), Maryam Khan (Democratic), Brandon Chafee (Democratic), Daniel Gaiewski (Democratic), Michael "MJ" Shannon (Democratic), Julio A. Concepcion, Jane M. Garibay (Democratic), Nicholas Menapace (Democratic), Patrick Biggins (Democratic), Aimee Berger-Girvalo (Democratic), Ceci Maher (Democratic), Patricia Billie Miller (Democratic), Laurie Sweet (Democratic), Anthony L. Nolan (Democratic), Aundre Bumgardner (Democratic), Jan Hochadel (Democratic), Steven Winter (Democratic), Gary A. Winfield (Democratic), Hubert D. Delany (Democratic), Patricia A. Dillon (Democratic), Julie Kushner (Democratic), Sujata Gadkar-Wilcox (Democratic), Kate Farrar (Democratic), Nick Gauthier (Democratic), Travis Simms (Democratic), Jason Doucette (Democratic), Josh Elliott (Democratic), Saud Anwar (Democratic), Matt Blumenthal (Democratic), Matthew L. Lesser (Democratic), Jonathan Fazzino (Democratic), Hilda E. Santiago (Democratic), Morrin Bello, and Sanchez, J..
What is the current status of SB 397?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 03, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 397?
Track SB 397 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 397

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 397

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →