HB 5092 — AN ACT PROTECTING RENTERS FROM RENT INCREASES UPON THE TRANSFER OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
Last action — TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 09, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
9 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (9 D).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
The bill is designed to prevent rent increases for tenants when a residential property is sold to a new owner. It aims to maintain the current rent levels for renters despite changes in property ownership.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
10 added · 100 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill HB 5092 mainly involved the removal of specific references to the bill's previous title and filing details, making the text cleaner and easier to read. Additionally, there were minor wording adjustments for consistency and clarity, such as changing "a unit's" to "an accommodation's" and adding a reference to "such housing accommodation." These changes are important because they help ensure the bill is straightforward and unambiguous, which can facilitate better understanding and implementation.
House of Representatives General Assembly FileSubstitute Bill No.
1805092 February Session, 2026 SubstituteAN HouseACT BillPROTECTING No.RENTERS FROM RENT INCREASES UPON THE TRANSFER OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
5092 House of Representatives, March 26, 2026 The Committee on Housing reported through REP.
FELIPE of the 130th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT PROTECTING RENTERS FROM RENT INCREASES UPON THE TRANSFER OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
(6) repairs necessary to make such accommodations reasonably sHB5092livable /for Filethe No.occupants accommodated therein;
180 1 sHB5092 File No.
180 livable for the occupants accommodated therein;
(11) damages done to the premises by the tenant,LCO caused1 byof other4 thanSubstitute ordinaryBill wearNo. and tear;
5092 tenant, caused by other than ordinary wear and tear;
(4) Nothing in this subsection shall preclude a fair rent commission from determining that a proposed rent increase of five per cent or less is sHB5092harsh /and Fileunconscionable No.or unfair and inequitable pursuant to subsection (a) of this section and section 7-148d, as amended by this act.
180 2 sHB5092 File No.
180 harsh and unconscionable or unfair and inequitable pursuant to subsection (a) of this section and section 7-148d, as amended by this act.
(a)LCO (1)2 If a commission determines, after a hearing, that the rental charge or proposed increase in the rental charge for any housing accommodation is so excessive, based on the standards and criteria set forth in subsection (a) of section4 7-148c,Substitute asBill amendedNo. by this act, as to be harsh and unconscionable, it may order that the rent be limited to such an amount as it determines to be fair and equitable.
5092 (a) (1) If a commission determines, after a hearing, that the rental charge or proposed increase in the rental charge for any housing accommodation is so excessive, based on the standards and criteria set forth in subsection (a) of section 7-148c, as amended by this act, as to be harsh and unconscionable, it may order that the rent be limited to such an amount as it determines to be fair and equitable.
sHB5092This /act Fileshall No.take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
180 3 sHB5092 File No.
180 This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
2 October 1, 2026 7-148d StatementLCO 3 of Legislative4 Commissioners:Substitute Bill No.
In5092 SectionHSG 1(b)(3),Joint "aFavorable unit's"Subst. was changed to "an accommodation's" for consistency;
andPD inJoint SectionFavorable 2(a)(2),LCO a4 referenceof to4 "such housing accommodation" was added for clarity.
HSG Joint Favorable Subst.
sHB5092 / File No.
180 4 sHB5092 File No.
180 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $ Various Municipalities Precludes None Potential Grand List Growth Explanation The bill may preclude grand list growth in various municipalities beginning in FY 28 by limiting certain rental increases.
This may limit an increase in value for rental properties that are valued using the income capitalization method.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the number of impacted properties.
1The bill only impacts municipalities with a fair rent commission as it expands the factors that a fair rent commission must considering when determining if a proposed rent increase is excessive.
Municipalities that do not have a fair rent commission will not have an impact.
sHB5092 / File No.
180 5 sHB5092 File No.
180 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 5092 AN ACT PROTECTING RENTERS FROM RENT INCREASES UPON THE TRANSFER OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
SUMMARY This bill modifies the factors that fair rent commissions (see BACKGROUND) must generally consider when determining whether a proposed rent increase is excessive (generally meaning “harsh and unconscionable”).
Specifically, it requires commissions to consider whether ownership of an accommodation was transferred within the last 12 months.
If so, the commission must next determine whether the new owner has completed “major renovations” to the accommodation, meaning those with a total cost exceeding $50,000.
Show all 54 changed lines (14 more)
Under the bill, if a fair rent commission determines that the new owner completed major renovations, it must use existing law’s standards and criteria to assess the proposed rent increase and may order a rent reduction accordingly.
If the fair rent commission determines the new owner has not completed major renovations, the commission must determine the proposed rent increase as excessive if it would increase the accommodation’s rental rate, compared to the previous year’s rate, by more than (a) 5% or (b) the average increase in the consumer price index (CPI) for urban consumers during the most recent calendar year.
If, after holding a hearing, a fair rent commission determines that the proposed rent increase for an accommodation without major renovations is excessive, it must order the owner to limit it to the greater of (1) 5% or (2) the CPI increase discussed above.
(It is unclear how a commission carries out this provision in the case of a proposed rent increase that is greater than the CPI increase but less than 5%.) sHB5092 / File No.
180 6 sHB5092 File No.
180 The bill specifies that its provisions do not prevent a fair rent commission from determining that a proposed rent increase of less than 5% is excessive based on existing law’s standards and criteria.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2026 BACKGROUND Fair Rent Commissions By law, fair rent commissions are empowered to (1) control and eliminate excessive rental charges and (2) enforce landlord-tenant statutes prohibiting landlord retaliation and establishing eviction protections for certain protected tenants.
Among other things, commissions may receive rent complaints and hold hearings on them (CGS § 7-148b et seq.).
The law requires municipalities with a population of at least 15,000, by January 1, 2028, to have a fair rent commission or be part of a joint or regional commission.
It also allows other municipalities below this population threshold to have or join one.
Related Bill sSB 332, reported favorably by the Housing Committee, requires fair rent commissions to notify parties to a hearing of their rights and the scope of the commission’s lawful authority.
COMMITTEE ACTION Housing Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 13 Nay 6 (03/10/2026) sHB5092 / File No.
180 7
Show all 54 changed rows (14 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- PD Joint Favorable View text pdf
- File No. 180 View text pdf
- Governor's Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute HSG Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
Action History
-
TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
NO NEW FILE BY COMM. ON Planning and Development
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
REF. BY HOUSE TO COMMITTEE ON Planning and Development
-
FILE NO. 180
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 146
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/25/26
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0224
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Housing
Sponsors
- Hilda E. Santiago · Primary
- Roland J. Lemar · Primary
- Larry B. Butler · Primary
- Martin M. Looney · Primary
- Nicholas Menapace · Primary
- Travis Simms · Primary
- Anthony L. Nolan · Primary
- Nick Gauthier · Primary
- Geraldo C. Reyes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →9 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 178 not signed on
Sponsors (9)
- Hilda E. Santiago Democratic
- Roland J. Lemar Democratic
- Larry B. Butler Democratic
- Martin M. Looney Democratic
- Nicholas Menapace Democratic
- Travis Simms Democratic
- Anthony L. Nolan Democratic
- Nick Gauthier Democratic
- Geraldo C. Reyes Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (178)
178 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 178 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 5092 do?
- The bill is designed to prevent rent increases for tenants when a residential property is sold to a new owner. It aims to maintain the current rent levels for renters despite changes in property ownership.
- Who sponsors HB 5092?
- HB 5092 is sponsored by Hilda E. Santiago (Democratic), Roland J. Lemar (Democratic), Larry B. Butler (Democratic), Martin M. Looney (Democratic), Nicholas Menapace (Democratic), Travis Simms (Democratic), Anthony L. Nolan (Democratic), Nick Gauthier (Democratic), and Geraldo C. Reyes (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 5092?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 09, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 5092?
- Track HB 5092 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 5092
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 5092
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →