Connecticut 2026 Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 4 R · 3 D cosponsors

HB 5570 — AN ACT CONCERNING A TAX CREDIT FOR MILK PRODUCERS.

Last action — FILE NO. 672

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 20, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 42% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 7 sponsors

    7 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (4 R · 3 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

173 added · 43 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of Bill HB 5570 adds a statement indicating its passage through the House committee and includes a fiscal impact note, which outlines potential revenue losses for the state. Specifically, it estimates that in the fiscal year 2028, the Department of Revenue Services could see a revenue loss of up to $8 million. This change is important as it highlights the financial implications of the bill, helping lawmakers and the public understand the potential economic effects of the legislation.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
5570 February Session, 2026 LCO No.
672 February Session, 2026 Substitute House Bill No.
3028 Referred to Committee on FINANCE, REVENUE AND BONDING Introduced by:
5570 House of Representatives, April 16, 2026 The Committee on Finance, Revenue and Bonding reported through REP.
(FIN) AN ACT CONCERNING A TAX CREDIT FOR MILK PRODUCERS.
HORN of the 64th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING A TAX CREDIT FOR MILK PRODUCERS.
(b) Each milk producer shall be allowed a credit against the tax imposed under chapter 208 or 229 of the general statutes, other than the liability imposed by section 12-707 of the general statutes, in an amount equal to, for each month of the income or taxable year the federal pay price is below the minimum sustainable monthly cost of production, (1) the dollar amount the federal pay price was below the minimum sustainable monthly cost of production, and (2) multiplied by the amount of milk produced by such milk producer for such month.
(b) Each milk producer shall be allowed a credit against the tax imposed under chapter 208 or 229 of the general statutes, other than the liability imposed by section 12-707 of the general statutes, in an amount equal to, for each month of the income or taxable year the federal pay price is below the minimum sustainable monthly cost of production, (1) the dollar amount the federal pay price was below the minimum sustainable monthly cost of production, (2) multiplied by the amount of milk produced by such milk producer for such month.
Each milk producer shall file with the commissioner, in a form and manner prescribed by the commissioner, such information the commissioner LCO No.
Each milk producer shall file with the Commissioner of Agriculture, in a form and sHB5570 / File No.
3028 1 of 3 Raised Bill No.
672 1 sHB5570 File No.
5570 requires to substantiate the amount of milk produced by such milk producer.
672 manner prescribed by the commissioner, such information the commissioner requires to substantiate the amount of milk produced by such milk producer.
(c) If the taxpayer is an S corporation or an entity treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, the credit may be claimed by the taxpayer's shareholders or partners.
(c) (1) Any milk producer subject to the tax imposed under chapter 208 or 229 of the general statutes may apply to the Commissioner of Agriculture, in a form and manner prescribed by the commissioner, to reserve anallocationfor acredit under thissection.The applicationshall contain such information as the commissioner deems necessary to administer the provisions of this section.
The aggregate amount of credits reserved under this section shall not exceed eight million dollars in any calendar year.
(2) Upon verification by the commissioner that the conditions set forth in subsection (b) of this section have been satisfied and the amount of milk produced by a milk producer has been substantiated, the commissioner shall issue a voucher to the milk producer in the amount calculated pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.
The taxpayer shall file the voucher with the taxpayer's state tax return for the applicable income or taxable year.
(d) If the taxpayer is an S corporation or an entity treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, the credit may be claimed by the taxpayer's shareholders or partners.
(d) If the amount of the credit allowed pursuant to this section exceeds the taxpayer's liability for the tax imposed under chapter 208 or 229 of the general statutes, the Commissioner of Revenue Services shall treat such excess as an overpayment and, except as provided in section 12-739 or 12-742, shall refund the amount of such excess, without interest, to such taxpayer, provided the aggregate amount of credits allowed under this section shall not exceed eight million dollars in any calendar year.
(e) If the amount of the credit allowed pursuant to this section exceeds the taxpayer's liability for the tax imposed under chapter 208 or 229 of the general statutes, the Commissioner of Revenue Services shall treat such excess as an overpayment and, except as provided in section 12-739 or 12-742 of the general statutes, shall refund the amount of such excess, without interest, to such taxpayer.
If the total amount of such refunds exceeds the aggregate amount for the applicable calendar year, the amount of the refund payable to each taxpayer under this subsection shall be reduced proportionately.
sHB5570 / File No.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
672 2 sHB5570 File No.
Section 1 January 1, 2027, and New section applicable to income and taxable years commencing on or after January 1, 2027 Statement of Purpose:
672 This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
To establish a refundable credit for milk producers against the tax imposed under chapter 208 or 229 of the general statutes for the months when the federal pay price for milk is below the minimum sustainable monthly cost of production.
Section 1 January 1, 2027, and New section applicable to income and taxable years commencing on or after January 1, 2027 FIN Joint Favorable Subst.
LCO No.
sHB5570 / File No.
3028 2 of 3 Raised Bill No.
672 3 sHB5570 File No.
5570 [Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
672 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] LCO No.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
3028 3 of 3
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $ Revenue Serv., Dept.
GF - Revenue None Up to 8 Loss million Revenue Serv., Dept.
GF - Cost None Up to 75,000 Department of Agriculture GF - Cost 115,808 115,808 State Comptroller - Fringe GF - Cost 44,249 44,249 Benefits Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill, which establishes a refundable tax credit for milk producers, results in (1) a General Fund revenue loss of up to $8 million annually beginning in FY 28, (2) a one-time cost of up to $75,000 to the Department of Revenue Services in FY 28 associated with programming updates to the CTax tax administration system and myconneCT online portal to establish the refundable credit, and (3) an ongoing cost to the General Fund of $160,057 annually beginning in FY 27.
Ongoing Cost Impact The Department of Agriculture (DoAg) does not currently have the staff or expertise to establish a new tax credit program.
DoAg will require one new Grant and Contract Specialist with an annual salary of The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts administered by the Comptroller.
The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes is 41.82% of payroll in FY 27.
sHB5570 / File No.
672 4 sHB5570 File No.
672 $105,808 and corresponding fringe benefits of $44,249 to establish and administer the tax credit program for milk producers.
Additionally, DoAg will require $10,000 annually for licensing and software updates to manage thedata associatedwiththenewprogram.It isestimatedthat there are approximately 81 eligible milk producers in Connecticut.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing revenue impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the annual aggregate credit cap of $8 million;
the annualized ongoing cost impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation.
sHB5570 / File No.
Show all 69 changed rows (29 more)
Previous
Latest
672 5 sHB5570 File No.
672 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 5570 AN ACT CONCERNING A TAX CREDIT FOR MILK PRODUCERS.
SUMMARY This bill establishes a refundable tax credit for “milk producers” (people, firms, and corporations registered with the Department of Agriculture (DoAg) as producers of milk for pasteurization).
The credit amount is calculated using the same formula that is used for an existing state grant program that pays milk producers based on, generally, (1) the federally set milk price and (2) an amount needed to sustain state dairy operations.
The credit is available starting with the 2027 income and tax year and may be applied against the corporation business or personal income tax, but not thewithholding tax.
The billcapsthetotalamount ofcreditsthat may be reserved for this program at $8 million per year.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
January 1, 2027, and applicable to income and tax years starting on or after that date.
MILK PRICING AND TERMS Federal law governs the price paid to dairy farmers for milk.
Generally,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture(USDA) marketingordersset the price for milk and milk products by region.
One order sets the price paid in the New England and Mid-Atlantic states and is broken down into class 1 (fluid) milk and various other classes of milk products.
Under existing law and the bill, “federal pay price” is the northeast monthly uniform price for milk in the Hartford zone pursuant to the USDANortheastFederalMilkMarketingOrder.
“Minimumsustainable monthly cost of production” is 82% of the baseline the USDA’s Economic Research Service determines as the monthly average cost of sHB5570 / File No.
672 6 sHB5570 File No.
672 production for a New England state, or, if the baseline is unavailable, a baseline determined by the DoAg commissioner using data and variables published by USDA.
CREDIT FORMULA, RESERVATIONS, AND VOUCHERS Under the bill, thetax credit equals, for eachmonth oftheincome and tax year that the federal pay price is below the minimum sustainable monthly cost ofproduction,thedifference betweenthefederalpay price and the minimum sustainable monthly cost of production, multiplied by the amount of milk a milk producer produced during the month.
Under the bill, milk producers may apply to the DoAg commissioner to reserve a credit allocation.
The commissioner must create the application form, which must include the information he needs to administer the tax credit program.
Relatedly, the bill requires milk producers to file with the commissioner information to support the amount of milk they produced, in a way he prescribes.
Once verified, the commissioner must issue the milk producer a voucher for its credit amount.
The milk producer must file this voucher with its state tax return for the applicable income or tax year.
CREDIT CLAIMS If the milk producer isan S corporationor treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, the milk producer’s shareholders and partners may claim the credit.
If the milk producer is a single member limited liability company (LLC) that is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner, the LLC’s owner may claim the credit, as long as the owner is subject to either the corporation business or personal income tax.
CREDIT REFUNDABILITY As is the case under existing law for most other refundable tax credits, the bill requires the Department of Revenue Services commissioner to refund, without interest, any amount of the tax credit that exceeds a milk producer’s liability, unless he retains the refund, which, by law, he may do if the milk producer (1) owes state or sHB5570 / File No.
672 7 sHB5570 File No.
672 municipal taxes or other obligations or (2) is in default of a student loan made by the Connecticut Student Loan Foundation or the Connecticut Higher Education Supplemental Loan Authority.
BACKGROUND Related Bill sSB84, § 27, favorablyreportedby theFinance, Revenue andBonding Committee, has identical provisions.
COMMITTEE ACTION Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 53 Nay 0 (03/30/2026) sHB5570 / File No.
672 8
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. FILE NO. 672

  2. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 446

  3. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  4. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  5. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/15/26

  6. FILED WITH LCO

  7. Joint Favorable Substitute

  8. PUBLIC HEARING 0327

  9. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Finance, Revenue and Bonding

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 180 not signed on

Sponsors (7)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (180)

180 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 180 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 5570?
HB 5570 is sponsored by Tami Zawistowski (Republican), Tammy Nuccio (Republican), Jaime S. Foster (Democratic), Saud Anwar (Democratic), Mark DeCaprio (Republican), Jeff Gordon (Republican), and Joseph P. Gresko (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 5570?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 20, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HB 5570?
Track HB 5570 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5570

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 5570

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →