Connecticut 2026 Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

SB 278 — AN ACT CONCERNING MILITARY PROTECTIVE ORDERS TO ADDRESS MILITARY INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE.

Last action — FAV. CHG. OF REF. HOUSE TO COMM. ON Judiciary

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Prognosis

Stalled 16% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

52 added · 58 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill SB 278 adds the requirement for an automated registry that will now include military protective orders issued by military installation law enforcement. Previously, the bill defined what a military protective order is and how it could be registered in Connecticut, but now it also ensures that such orders are officially recorded and tracked. This change is significant because it enhances the protection of service members by ensuring that their military protective orders are recognized and included in the state's protective order database, improving safety measures for those affected by such orders.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Substitute Bill No.
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
278 February Session, 2026 AN ACT CONCERNING MILITARY PROTECTIVE ORDERS TO ADDRESS MILITARY INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE.
278 February Session, 2026 LCO No.
1146 Referred to Committee on VETERANS' AND MILITARY AFFAIRS Introduced by:
(VA) AN ACT CONCERNING MILITARY PROTECTIVE ORDERS TO ADDRESS MILITARY INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE.
Upon receipt of the application the court shall order that a hearing on the application be held not later than fourteen days from the date of the order except that, if the application indicates that the respondent holds a permit to carry a pistol or revolver, an eligibility certificate for a pistol or revolver, a long gun eligibility certificate or an ammunition certificate or possesses one or more firearms or ammunition, and the court orders an ex parte order, the court shall order that a hearing be held on the application not later than seven days from the date on which the ex parte order is issued.
Upon receipt of the application the court shall order that a hearing on the application be held not later than fourteen days from the date of the order except that, if the application indicates that the respondent holds a permit to carry a pistol or revolver, an eligibility certificate for a pistol or revolver, a long gun LCO No.
The court, in its discretion, may make such orders as it deems appropriate LCO 1 of 6 Substitute Bill No.
1146 1 of 6 Raised Bill No.
278 for the protection of the applicant and such dependent children or other persons as the court sees fit.
278 eligibility certificate or an ammunition certificate or possesses one or more firearms or ammunition, and the court orders an ex parte order, the court shall order that a hearing be held on the application not later than seven days from the date on which the ex parte order is issued.
The court, in its discretion, may make such orders as it deems appropriate for the protection of the applicant and such dependent children or other persons as the court sees fit.
Such order may include provisions necessary to protect any animal owned or kept by the applicant including, but not limited to, an order enjoining the respondent from injuring or threatening to injure such animal.
Such order may include provisions necessary to protect any animal owned or kept by the applicant including, but not limited to, an order enjoining the respondent from injuring or threatening to injure LCO No.
1146 2 of 6 Raised Bill No.278 such animal.
If a hearing on the application LCO 2 of 6 Substitute Bill No.
If a hearing on the application is scheduled or an ex parte order is granted and the court is closed on the scheduled hearing date, the hearing shall be held on the next day the court is open and any such ex parte order shall remain in effect until the date of such hearing.
278 is scheduled or an ex parte order is granted and the court is closed on the scheduled hearing date, the hearing shall be held on the next day the court is open and any such ex parte order shall remain in effect until the date of such hearing.
If the applicant attests that disclosure of the applicant's location information would jeopardize the health, safety or liberty of the applicant or the applicant's children, the applicant may request, on a form prescribed by the Chief Court Administrator, that his or her location information not be disclosed.
If the applicant attests that disclosure of the applicant's location information would jeopardize the health, safety or LCO No.
1146 3 of 6 Raised Bill No.
278 liberty of the applicant or the applicant's children, the applicant may request, on a form prescribed by the Chief Court Administrator, that his or her location information not be disclosed.
If a postponement of a hearing on the application is requested by either LCO 3 of 6 Substitute Bill No.
If a postponement of a hearing on the application is requested by either party, no ex parte order shall be continued except upon agreement of the parties or by order of the court for good cause shown.
278 party, no ex parte order shall be continued except upon agreement of the parties or by order of the court for good cause shown.
(1) Imposing any restraint upon the person or liberty of the applicant;
(1) Imposing any LCO No.
1146 4 of 6 Raised Bill No.278 restraint upon the person or liberty of the applicant;
LCO 4 of 6 Substitute Bill No.
278 Sec.
3.
(NEW) (Effective October 1, 2026) (a) As used in this section, "military protective order" means a protective order issued by a commanding officer in the armed forces of the United States or the Connecticut National Guard against a person under such officer's command.
(b) A military protective order may be registered in this state by sendingtotheSuperiorCourtinthisstate:(1)Aletterorotherdocument requesting registration;
(2) two copies, including one certified copy, of the military protective order sought to be registered and a statement under penalty of perjury that, to the best of the knowledge and belief of the petitioner, the order has not been modified;
and (3) the name and address of the person seeking registration, except if the disclosure of such name and address would jeopardize the safety of such person.
(c) On receipt of the documents required in subsection (b) of this section, the registering court shall:
(1) Cause the military protective order to be filed, together with one copy of any accompanying documents and information, regardless of their form;
and (2) cause the military protective order to be entered in the automated registry of protective orders maintained pursuant to section 51-5c of the general statutes, as amended by this act, together with any accompanying information required or permitted to be contained in the registry of protective orders pursuant to the procedures adopted by the Chief Court Administrator under section 51-5c of the general statutes, as amended by this act.
4.
3.
(a) The Chief Court Administrator shall establish and maintain an automated registry of protective orders that shall contain (1) protective or restraining orders issued by courts of this state, including, but not limited to,ordersissuedpursuant to sections46b-15,asamendedby this act, 46b-16a, as amended by this act, 46b-38c, 53a-40e, 54-1k, 54-82q and LCO 5 of 6 Substitute Bill No.
(a) The Chief Court Administrator shall establish and maintain an automated registry of protective orders that shall contain (1) protective or restraining orders issued by courts of this state, including, but not limited to,ordersissuedpursuant to sections46b-15,asamendedby this act, 46b-16a, as amended by this act, 46b-38c, 53a-40e, 54-1k, 54-82q and 54-82r, [and] (2) foreign orders of protection that have been registered in this state pursuant to section 46b-15a, and (3) military protective orders that have been entered by military installation law enforcement agencies into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) computerized index of criminal justice information.
278 54-82r, [and] (2) foreign orders of protection that have been registered in this state pursuant to section 46b-15a, and (3) military protective ordersthat have beenregistered in this state pursuant to section 3 of this act.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
As used in this subsection, "military protective order" means a protective order issued by a commanding officer in the armed forces of the United States or the Connecticut National Guard against a person under such officer's command.
LCO No.
1146 5 of 6 Raised Bill No.
278 This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
3 October 1, 2026 New section Sec.
3 October 1, 2026 51-5c(a) Statement of Purpose:
4 October 1, 2026 51-5c(a) VA Joint Favorable Subst.
To (1) provide that courts may consider prior or existing military protective orders that are contained in the state's automated registry of protective orders when issuing a civil protective order for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, sexual violence or stalking, and (2) specify that such registry contains military protective orders that have been entered into the National Crime Information Center computerized index.
C/R JUD LCO 6 of 6
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] LCO No.
Show all 41 changed rows (1 more)
Previous
Latest
1146 6 of 6
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. FAV. CHG. OF REF. HOUSE TO COMM. ON Judiciary

  2. FAV. CHG. OF REF., SEN. TO COMM. ON Judiciary

  3. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  4. FILED WITH LCO

  5. Joint Favorable Substitute Change of Reference JUD

  6. PUBLIC HEARING 0224

  7. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Veterans' and Military Affairs

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (186)

186 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 186 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 278?
SB 278 is sponsored by Aimee Berger-Girvalo (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 278?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 278?
Track SB 278 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 278

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 278

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →