AN ACT CONCERNING THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 5428 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 5428.
You're tracking HB 5428
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 5428 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.
Last action — FILE NO. 599
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 27, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
82 added · 13 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill HB 5428 adds a new section that outlines a Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis, providing more clarity on the financial implications of the bill for members of the General Assembly. This addition helps lawmakers better understand the potential economic effects of the legislation. Meanwhile, some repetitive references were removed, streamlining the document. These changes matter because they enhance the bill's transparency and make it easier for lawmakers to evaluate its financial consequences.
House of Representatives General Assembly SubstituteFile Bill No.
5428599 February Session, 2026 ANSubstitute ACTHouse CONCERNINGBill THENo. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.
5428 House of Representatives, April 13, 2026 The Committee on Judiciary reported through REP.
STAFSTROM of the 129th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.
(2)sHB5428 (A)/ ExceptFile asNo. provided under subdivision (1) of this subsection, whenever a person dies [in the] within the physical custody of a peace officer or law enforcement agency, the Inspector General shall investigate and determine whether physical force was used by a peace officer upon the deceased person, and if so, whether the use of physical force by the peace officer was justifiable under section 53a-22.
If599 the LCO 1 ofsHB5428 6File Substitute Bill No.
5428599 Inspector(2) General(A) determinesExcept theas deceasedprovided personunder maysubdivision have(1) diedof asthis subsection, whenever a resultperson dies [in the] within the physical custody of criminala actionpeace notofficer involvingor law enforcement agency, the useInspector ofGeneral shall investigate and determine whether physical force was used by a peace officer,officer upon the Inspectordeceased Generalperson, shalland referif suchso, casewhether to the Chiefuse State'sof Attorneyphysical orforce aby state'sthe attorneypeace forofficer potentialwas prosecution.justifiable under section 53a-22.
If the Inspector General determines the deceased person may have died as a result of criminal action not involving the use of force by a peace officer, the Inspector General shall refer such case to the Chief State's Attorney or a state's attorney for potential prosecution.
(3) Whenever a person who (A) is a next of kin of a deceased person, (B) is not notified of such deceased person's death as required pursuant to section 7-294mm and no other person who is a next of kin of the deceased person was so notified, and (C) requests of the Office of the Inspector General an investigation of the lack of notification or timely notification of such death, the Inspector General shall investigate and determine whether there was any malfeasance on the part of a peace officer or a supervisor of the peace officer in the failure to provide such notification or timely notification, and if so, may make recommendations to the Police Officer Standards and Training Council established under section 7-294b concerning censure, suspension, renewal, cancelation or revocation of the peace officer's or supervisor's certification, provided any such recommendation may be made to said council only in a case where such failure is found to be intentional or madesHB5428 with/ recklessFile indifference.No.
599 2 sHB5428 File No.
599 made with reckless indifference.
(4) The Inspector General shall request the appropriate law LCOenforcement 2agency ofto 6provide Substitutesuch Billassistance No.as is necessary to investigate and make a determination under subdivision (1), (2) or (3) of this subsection.
5428 enforcement agency to provide such assistance as is necessary to investigate and make a determination under subdivision (1), (2) or (3) of this subsection.
The Chief State's Attorney shall provide a copy of the report to the chief executive officer of the municipality in which the incident occurred and to the Commissioner of Emergency Services and Public Protection or the chief ofsHB5428 police/ ofFile suchNo. municipality, as the case may be, and shall make such report available to the public on the Division of Criminal Justice's Internet web site not later than forty-eight hours after the copies are provided to the chief executive officer and the commissioner or chief of police.
LCO599 3 ofsHB5428 6File Substitute Bill No.
5428599 (c)of Thepolice Office of thesuch Inspectormunicipality, Generalas shallthe prosecutecase anymay casebe, inand whichshall themake Inspectorsuch Generalreport determinesavailable thatto (1)the public on the useDivision of forceCriminal byJustice's aInternet peaceweb officersite was not justifiablelater underthan sectionforty-eight 53a-22,hours orafter (2)the therecopies wasare aprovided failure to intervenethe inchief suchexecutive incidentofficer orand tothe reportcommissioner anyor suchchief incident, as required under subsection (a) of sectionpolice. 7-282e or section 18-81nn.
(c) The Office of the Inspector General shall prosecute any case in which the Inspector General determines that (1) the use of force by a peace officer was not justifiable under section 53a-22, or (2) there was a failure to intervene in such incident or to report any such incident, as required under subsection (a) of section 7-282e or section 18-81nn.
and [(5)] (6) make recommendations to the Police Officer Standards and Training CouncilsHB5428 established/ underFile section 7-294b concerning censure and suspension, renewal, cancelation or revocation of a peace officer's certification, provided in the case of a failure to report a death of a person, any such recommendation may be made to said council only in a case where such failure is found to be intentional or made with reckless indifference, or if there is no finding that such failure was LCO 4 of 6 Substitute Bill No.
5428599 intentional4 orsHB5428 madeFile withNo. reckless indifference, a recommendation may be made to the officer's employing agency for any further disciplinary action as so determined by such employing agency.
599 Council established under section 7-294b concerning censure and suspension, renewal, cancelation or revocation of a peace officer's certification, provided in the case of a failure to report a death of a person, any such recommendation may be made to said council only in a case where such failure is found to be intentional or made with reckless indifference, or if there is no finding that such failure was intentional or made with reckless indifference, a recommendation may be made to the officer's employing agency for any further disciplinary action as so determined by such employing agency.
(f) The Office of the Inspector General shall be at a location that is separate from the locations of the Office of the Chief State's Attorney or anysHB5428 of/ theFile state'sNo. attorneys for the judicial districts.
599 5 sHB5428 File No.
599 any of the state's attorneys for the judicial districts.
Such staff shall be selected by the Inspector General within the confines of any existing collective bargaining agreement and LCOshall 5include, ofbut 6not Substitutebe Billlimited No.to, an assistant state's attorney or a deputy assistant state's attorney, an inspector and administrative staff.
5428 shall include, but not be limited to, an assistant state's attorney or a deputy assistant state's attorney, an inspector and administrative staff.
-LCO LCOsHB5428 6/ ofFile 6No.
599 6 sHB5428 File No.
599 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill, which makes clarifying and conforming changes to the powers and duties of the Office of the Inspector General, does not result in a fiscal impact as the changes largely align with current practice.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None sHB5428 / File No.
599 7 sHB5428 File No.
599 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 5428 AN ACT CONCERNING THE POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.
SUMMARY This bill makes several changes to requirements for the inspector general to investigate deaths that (1) involve peace officer use of physical or deadly force or (2) occur in the custody of a peace officer, law enforcement agency, or the Department of Correction (DOC).
Show all 52 changed lines (12 more)
First, the bill limits the custodial death investigations to circumstances involving the death of someone in physical custody, rather than any custody (such as the legal custody of an individual on parole).
Existing law requires the inspector general to file a report with the chief state’s attorney after investigating a death from a peace officer’s use of force or that happens in a peace officer’s or law enforcement agency’s custody.
Currently, the report must include (1) the incident’s circumstances, (2) a determination on the use of force (whether it was justifiable), and (3) recommended future actions for the Office of the Inspector General (OIG).
The bill requires the recommendations to be for the involved law enforcement agency rather than OIG.
Relatedly, it allows the inspector general to issue a report on the death of someone inDOC physical custody,whichmay include any recommendedactions for DOC to take.
Lastly, the bill (1) specifies that the inspector general’s authority to issue subpoenas to compel a person’s attendance and testimony in an investigation applies to investigative depositions and (2) makes a conforming change to the statute that lists OIG’s duties by including investigating the death of someone in the physical custody of a peace officer, law enforcement agency, or DOC.
sHB5428 / File No.
599 8 sHB5428 File No.
599 EFFECTIVE DATE:
Upon passage BACKGROUND Related Bills sSB 91, § 1 (File 491), and sSB 397, § 3 (File 399), both favorably reported by the Judiciary Committee, expand the inspector general’s investigatory authority for deaths involving peace officer use of force or that occur in an officer’s custody by applying it to deaths following the use of force by, or in the custody of, any federal law enforcement officer.
COMMITTEE ACTION Judiciary Committee Joint Favorable Yea 32 Nay 4 (03/24/2026) sHB5428 / File No.
599 9
Show all 52 changed rows (12 more)
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends the powers and duties of the Office of the Inspector General regarding investigations and reporting processes related to peace officers and deaths in custody.
-
Section 51-277a
whenever a person dies in the physical custody of a peace officer or law enforcement agency→ whenever a person dies within the physical custody of a peace officer or law enforcement agencyClarifies the language regarding death in custody.
-
Section 51-277a
whenever a person dies in the physical custody of the Commissioner of Correction→ whenever a person dies within the physical custody of the Commissioner of CorrectionClarifies the language regarding death in custody under the Commissioner of Correction.
-
Section 51-277a
[Office of the Inspector General]→ law enforcement agencyChanges the reporting responsibility from the Office of the Inspector General to the relevant law enforcement agency.
-
Section 51-277e
make recommendations to the Police Officer Standards and Training Council concerning censure and suspension, renewal, cancelation or revocation of a peace officer's certification→ make recommendations to the Police Officer Standards and Training Council concerning censure, suspension, renewal, cancelation or revocation of the peace officer's or supervisor's certificationExpands the scope of recommendations regarding certification revocation to include supervisors as well.
-
Section 51-277e
[5]→ (6)Renumbers the existing items in the list of duties of the Office of the Inspector General.
-
Section 51-277e
Any recommendations may be made to the Police Officer Standards and Training Council only in a case where such failure is found to be intentional or made with reckless indifference.→ provided in the case of a failure to report a death of a person, any such recommendation may be made to said council only in a case where such failure is found to be intentional or made with reckless indifference.Clarifies the conditions under which recommendations regarding police officer certification may be made.
Action History
-
FILE NO. 599
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 402
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/13/26
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0318
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Antonio Felipe · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Antonio Felipe Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (186)
186 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 186 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 5428?
- HB 5428 is sponsored by Antonio Felipe (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 5428?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 27, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 5428?
- Track HB 5428 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 5428
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 5428
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →