HB 1199 — Replacement of Stolen Catalytic Converters
Last action — House Committee on Appropriations Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 11, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
When a catalytic converter mechanically fails or is stolen from a motor vehicle, current rules of the air quality control commission require the replacement to comply with the rules of the California air resources board. The bill creates a temporary exception (exception) that allows an individual to use a replacement catalytic converter that complies with the standards established by rules of the United States environmental protection agency if:In the case of the theft of a catalytic converter, the theft has been reported to a law enforcement agency; andThe owner or operator of the motor vehicle has made a reasonable effort to obtain the required replacement catalytic converter and has been unable to obtain the replacement catalytic converter.The exception is repealed, effective July 1, 2028.The bill prohibits a motor vehicle repair facility or any employee or contract laborer of the facility from repairing or replacing a catalytic converter that has failed or been stolen without first informing the customer about available state programs to replace an internal combustion vehicle with a zero-emission alternative.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf February 11, 2026
Action History
-
House Committee on Appropriations Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed
-
House Committee on Energy & Environment Refer Amended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Energy & Environment
Sponsors
- M. Ball · Primary
- Javier Mabrey · Primary
- Tisha Mauro · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 98 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- M. Ball
- Javier Mabrey Democrat
- Tisha Mauro Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (98)
98 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 98 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Paschal | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Lesley Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Lori Goldstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Manny Rutinel | Democrat | Yea |
| Carlos Barron | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
How each member voted (1)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Matt Soper | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1199 do?
- When a catalytic converter mechanically fails or is stolen from a motor vehicle, current rules of the air quality control commission require the replacement to comply with the rules of the California air resources board. The bill creates a temporary exception (exception) that allows an individual to use a replacement catalytic converter that complies with the standards established by rules of the United States environmental protection agency if:In the case of the theft of a catalytic converter, the theft has been reported to a law enforcement agency; andThe owner or operator of the motor vehicle has made a reasonable effort to obtain the required replacement catalytic converter and has been unable to obtain the replacement catalytic converter.The exception is repealed, effective July 1, 2028.The bill prohibits a motor vehicle repair facility or any employee or contract laborer of the facility from repairing or replacing a catalytic converter that has failed or been stolen without first informing the customer about available state programs to replace an internal combustion vehicle with a zero-emission alternative.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
- Who sponsors HB 1199?
- HB 1199 is sponsored by M. Ball, Javier Mabrey (Democrat), and Tisha Mauro (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1199?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 11, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 1199?
- Track HB 1199 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1199
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1199
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →