SB 95 — Measures to Support Victim-Survivors of Crimes
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 19, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
41 sponsors
3 primary, 38 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (13 D).
-
Mixed recorded votes
10 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill provides support measures for victims of certain crimes in Colorado.
This legislation requires medical professionals to keep victims informed about forensic exam results and protections for their statements. It also establishes training for peace officers on trauma-informed responses.
What this means for you
- Workers: For professionals in medical and law enforcement fields, this bill requires enhanced training and specific communication protocols with crime victims.
Summary
The act requires a licensee, nurse, or certified midwife who performs a medical forensic examination to inform the victim-survivor about how to determine when the testing related to the examination is complete and how to obtain the results and records. The act subjects a cause of action against a person arising from any protected statement by a victim-survivor to a special motion to dismiss unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a reasonable likelihood that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. The act makes a predispute arbitration agreement and predispute joint-action waiver void and unenforceable upon request of an individual who alleges conduct that results in a sexual harassment dispute or a sexual misconduct dispute or upon request of a named representative of a joint action, class action, or collective action that results in a sexual harassment dispute or a sexual misconduct dispute. The act requires a judge to allow a forensic scientist to testify remotely in a criminal proceeding if a party requests and both parties consent to the remote testimony. The act authorizes the court to order that the testimony of a victim-survivor of domestic violence, unlawful sexual behavior, stalking, human trafficking for involuntary servitude, or human trafficking for sexual servitude be taken in a room other than the courtroom and be televised by closed-circuit television in the courtroom under certain circumstances. The act requires peace officer annual in-service training programs to include a 2-hour training to improve a peace officer's understanding of the impact of trauma on victim-survivors of crimes and the optimal way for a peace officer to respond to victim-survivors who are experiencing trauma and includes trauma-informed investigation and response training as a permissible use of peace officer training and support fund money. The act renames the Colorado sexual assault forensic medical evidence review board as the Colorado sexual assault response review board and adds 4 members to the board.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
234 added · 242 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Senate Bill 95 includes new provisions that require medical professionals, like nurses and certified midwives, to provide victims of certain crimes with the contact information for local victim advocates when they file a medical report. This change aims to enhance support for victims by ensuring they are connected with resources that can help them navigate their situation. Providing this information is a crucial step in fostering a supportive environment for those seeking assistance after experiencing a crime.
NOTE:SENATE BILL 26-095 BY SENATOR(S) Weissman, Amabile, Ball, Benavidez, Bridges, Exum, Gonzales J., Jodeh, Kipp, Marchman, Roberts, Snyder, Wallace, Coleman;
Thisalso billREPRESENTATIVE(S) hasFroelich beenand preparedWillford, forBoesenecker, theBrown, signaturesClifford, ofDuran, theFlanell, appropriateGarcia, legislativeGoldstein, officersHamrick, andJackson, theJoseph, Governor.Keltie, Lieder, Lindsay, Lukens, Nguyen, Paschal, Rutinel, Sirota, Smith, Stewart K., Story, Titone, Weinberg, Zokaie, McCluskie.
ToCONCERNING determineMEASURES whetherTO theSUPPORT GovernorVICTIM-SURVIVORS hasOF signedCERTAIN theCRIMES billTHAT orDO takenNOT otherINCLUDE actionCHANGES onTO it,SUBSTANTIVECRIMINAL pleaseOFFENSES. consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
SENATEBe BILLit 26-095enacted BYby SENATOR(S)the Weissman,GeneralAssembly Amabile,ofthe Ball,State Benavidez,ofColorado: Bridges, Exum, Gonzales J., Jodeh, Kipp,Marchman,Roberts, Snyder, Wallace, Coleman;
also REPRESENTATIVE(S)FroelichandWillford, Boesenecker, Brown, Clifford, Duran, Flanell, Garcia, Goldstein, Hamrick, Jackson, Joseph, Keltie, Lieder, Lindsay, Lukens, Nguyen, Paschal, Rutinel, Sirota, Smith, Stewart K., Story, Titone, Weinberg, Zokaie, McCluskie.
C ONCERNING MEASURES TO SUPPORT VICTIM -SURVIVORS OF CERTAIN CRIMESTHATDONOTINCLUDECHANGESTOSUBSTANTIVECRIMINAL OFFENSES .
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 12-240-139, amend (1)(b)(V)(B)(l)(b)(V)(B) and (1)(b)(V)(C);(l)(b)(V)(C);
and add (1)(b)(V)(D)(l)(b)(V)(D) as follows:
(1) (b) (V) A licensee, nurse, or certified midwife who performs a medical forensic examination as described in subsection (1)(b)(I)(1)(b)(1) of this section shall inform the victim:
________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsdeletionsfrom from existing law andandsuch such material is not part of the act.
(B) Of the contact information for the nearest community-based victimadvocatepursuanttosection13-90-107(1)(k)(II)ifthevictimmakesvictimadvocatepursuanttosection 13-90-107(1)(k)(II) ifthevictimmakes a medical report pursuant to subsection (1)(b)(I)(B) of this section or an anonymous report pursuant to subsection (1)(b)(I)(C)(l)(b)(I)(C) ofofthis this section;
and (C) That any forensic medical evidence collected must be maintained until after the assailant may no longer be prosecuted for the crime and that the victim must be notified prior to the destruction ofofsuch such THE evidence;
AND (D) HHow OW TO DETERMINE WHEN THE TESTING RELATED TO THE MEDICAL FORENSIC EXAMINATION IS COMPLETE AND HOW TO OBTAIN THE RESULTS AND RECORDSRECORDS. .
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 12-255-133.5, amend (1)(b)(l)(b) and (1)(c);(l)(c);
and add (1)(d)(l)(d) as follows:
(1) A licensee who performs a medical forensic examination as described in section 12-240-139 (1)(b)(I)(l)(b)(I) shall inform the victim:
(b) Of the contact information for the nearest community-based victimadvocatepursuanttosection13-90-107(1)(k)(II)ifthevictimmakesvictim advocatepursuanttosection 13-90-107(1)(k)(II) ifthevictimmakes a medical report pursuant to section 12-240-139 (1)(b)(I)(B)(l)(b)(I)(B) or an anonymous report pursuant to section 12-240-139 (1)(b)(I)(C);(l)(b)(I)(C);
and (c) ThatanyforensicmedicalevidencecollectedmustbemaintainedThatanyforensic medical evidencecollectedmustbemaintained until after the assailant may no longer be prosecuted for the crime and that the victim must be notified prior to the destruction ofofsuTHE suchevidence;evidence;
AND (d) HHow OW TO DETERMINE WHEN THE TESTING RELATED TO THE MEDICAL FORENSIC EXAMINATION IS COMPLETE AND HOW TO OBTAIN THE RESULTS AND RECORDSRECORDS. .
(1) AAs S USED IN THIS SECTION,UNLESSSECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRESREQUIRES: :
(a) "COMPLAINT"COMPLAINT" " MEANS A PETITION OR CROSS-COMPLAINTCROSS-COMPLAINT. .
(b) "DEFENDANT"DEFENDANT" "MEANSMEANS A RESPONDENT OR CROSSCROSS-DEFENDANT. -DEFENDANT .
(c) "PLAINTIFF"MEANS"PLAINTIFF" MEANS A PETITIONER OR CROSSCROSS-COMPLAINANT. COMPLAINANT .
(d) "PROTECTED STATEMENT BY A VICTIMVICTIM-SURVIVOR" SURVIVORMEANS: " MEANS :
(I) AANY NY WRITTEN OR ORAL STATEMENT OR WRITING MADE IN CONNECTION WITH ANY PHASE OF A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OR PROCEEDINGPROCEEDING; ;
(II) AANY NYWRI1TEN WRITTEN OR ORAL STATEMENT OR WRITING MADE IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED PURSUANTPURSUANTTO TOTITLE TITLEIXIX OFTHEFEDERAL "E"EDUCATIONAMENDMENTS DUCATIONOF AMENDMENTSOF 1972",20U.S.C.
SECSEC.1681; .1681;
(III) ANY WRITTEN OR ORAL STATEMENT OR WRITING MADE IN CONNECTION WITH A CHILD WELFARE INVESTIGATIONINVESTIGATION; ;
(IV) AANY NY WRITTEN OR ORAL STATEMENT OR WRITING MADE IN CONNECTION WITH A PETITION FOR CIVILPROTECTIONCIVIL PROTECTION ORDER PURSUANTPURSUANTTO TO ARTICLE 14 OF THIS TITLE 13OR13 OR AN EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDER PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 14.5OF14.5 OF THIS TITL13;TITLE13;
(V) AANY NYWRITTENORORALSTATEMENTORWRITINGTOANYPERSONWRITTENORORALSTATEMENTORWRITINGTOANY PERSON REQUIRED TO REPORT SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE OR NEGLECT PURSUANT TO SECTION 19-3-304;AND19-3-304; (VI) A NY WRITTEN OR ORAL STATEMENT OR WRITING MADE IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHER QUASI -JUDICIAL PROCEEDING.
(e)AND "VICTIM-SURVIVOR(VI) "MEANSANINDIVIDUALWHOISALLEGEDTOANY BEWRITTEN AOR VICTIMORAL OFSTATEMENT AOR CRIMEWRITING CHARGEDMADE IN THECONNECTION PRESENTWITH CASEANY WHICHOTHER INVOLVESQUASI-JUDICIAL DOMESTICPROCEEDING. VIOLENCE , AS DEFINED IN SECTION 18-6-800.3;
UNLAWFUL(e) SEXUAL"VICTIM-SURVIVOR" BEHAVIORMEANS ,ASAN DESCRIBEDINDIVIDUAL INWHO PARTIS 4ALLEGED OFTO ARTICLEBE 3A VICTIM OF TITLEA 18;CRIME CHARGED IN THE PRESENT CASE WHICH INVOLVES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 18-6-800.3;
PAGEUNLAWFUL 3-SENATESEXUAL BILLBEHAVIOR, 26-095AS STALKINGDESCRIBED ,ASIN DEFINEDPART IN4 SECTIONOF 18-3-602;ARTICLE 3 OF TITLE 18;
HUMANPA TRAFFICKINGG FORE INVOLUNTARY3-SEN SERVITUDEA ,ASTE BILL 26-095 STALKING, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 18-3-503;18-3-602;
OR HUMAN TRAFFICKING FOR SEXUALINVOLUNTARY SERVITUDESERVITUDE, ,ASAS DEFINED IN SECTION18-3-504.SECTION 18-3-503;
(2)OR (a)HUMAN ACAUSETRAFFICKING OFFOR ACTIONSEXUAL AGAINSTSERVITUDE, AAS PERSONDEFINED ARISINGIN FROMSECTION ANY18-3-504. PROTECTED STATEMENT BY A VICTIM SURVIVOR IS SUBJECT TO A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS UNLESS THE COURT DETERMINES THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS ESTABLISHED THAT THERE IS A REASONABLE LIKELIHOOD THAT THE PLAINTIFF WILL PREVAIL ON THE CLAIM.
(b)(2)(a) IMAKINGITSDETERMINATIONA ,THECOURTSHALLCONSIDERTHECAUSE PLEADINGSANDSUPPORTINGANDOPPOSINGAFFIDAVITSSTATINGTHEFACTSOF UPONACTION WHICHAGAINST A PERSON ARISING FROM ANY PROTECTED STATEMENT BY A VICTIM-SURVIVOR IS SUBJECT TO A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS UNLESS THE LIABILITYCOURT ORDETERMINES DEFENSETHAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS ESTABLISHED THAT THERE IS BASED.A REASONABLE LIKELIHOOD THAT THE PLAINTIFF WILL PREYAIL ON THE CLAIM.
(c)(b)IN IFMAKING THEITS COURTDETERMINATION,THECOURTSHALLCONSIDERTHE DETERMINESPLEADINGS THATAND THESUPPORTINGAND PLAINTIFFOPPOSINGAFFIDAVITS HASSTATINGTHE ESTABLISHEDAREASONABLELIKELIHOODTHATTHEPLAINTIFFWILLPREVAILFACTS ONUPON THEWHICH CLAIM , THE COURTLIABILITY 'S DETERMINATION IS NOT ADMISSIBLE AS EVIDENCE AT ANY LATER STAGE OF THE CASE OR ATDEFENSE ANY SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDING ,AND NO BURDEN OF PROOF OR DEGREE OF PROOF OTHERWISE APPLICABLE IS AFFECTEDBASED. BY THE COURT 'S DETERMINATION AT ANY LATER STAGE OF THE CASE OR AT ANY SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDING .
Show all 114 changed lines (74 more)
(3)(C) IF THE SPECIALMOTIONMUSTCOURT BEDETERMINES FILEDWITHINSIXTYTHAT -THREETHE DAYSPLAINTIFF AFTERTHEHAS SERVICEESTABLISHEDAREASONABLE OFTHELIKELIHOODTHATTHE COMPLAINTPLAINTIFF ORWILL ,INPREVAIL ON THE COURTSDISCRETIONCLAIM, ,ATTHE ACOURT'S LATERDETERMINATION TIMEIS UPONNOT TERMSITADMISSIBLE DEEMSAS PROPEREVIDENCE .THEAT COURTANY SHALLSCHEDULELATER STAGE OF THE MOTIONCASE FOROR AAT HEARINGANY NOTSUBSEQUENT MOREPROCEEDING, THANAND TWENTYNO -EIGHTBURDEN DAYSOF AFTERPROOF THEOR SERVICEDEGREE OF THEPROOF MOTIONOTHERWISE UNLESSAPPLICABLE IS AFFECTED BY THE DOCKETCOURT'S CONDITIONSDETERMINATION AT ANY LATER STAGE OF THE COURTCASE REQUIREOR AAT LATERANY HEARINGSUBSEQUENT .PROCEEDING.
(4)(3) ALLDISCOVERYPROCEEDINGSINTHEACTIONARESTAYEDUPON THE FILINGSPECIAL OFAMOTION NOTICEMUST OFMOTIONMADEBE PURSUANTFILED TOTHISWITHIN SECTIONSIXTY-THREE .THEDAYS STAYAFTER OFTHE DISCOVERYSERVICE REMAINSOFTHE INCOMPLAINT EFFECTOR, UNTILIN NOTICETHE OFCOURT'S ENTRYDISCRETION, OFAT THEA ORDERLATER RULINGTIME ONUPON THETERMS MOTIONIT .DEEMS PROPER.
NOTWITHSTANDINGTHE THISCOURT SUBSECTIONSHALL (4),SCHEDULE THECOURTMAYTHE ,ONNOTICEDMOTIONANDFORGOODCAUSESHOWNMOTION ,ORDERFOR THATA SPECIFIEDHEARING DISCOVERYNOT BEMORE CONDUCTEDTHAN .TWENTY-EIGHT DAYS AFTER THE SERVICE OF THE MOTION UNLESS THE DOCKET CONDITIONS OF THE COURT REQUIRE A LATER HEARING.
(5)(4) INALL ANYDISCOVERY ACTIONPROCEEDINGS SUBJECTIN TOTHE SUBSECTIONACTION (2)OFARE THISSTAYEO SECTIO,AUPON PREVAILINGTHE DEFENDANTFILING ONOF AANOTICE SPECIALOF MOTION TOMADE DISMISSPURSUANTTO ISTHIS ENTITLEDSECTION. TO RECOVER THE DEFENDANT 'S ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS .
IF THE COURTSTAY FINDSOF THATDISCOVERY AREMAINS SPECIALIN MOTIONEFFECT TOUNTIL DISMISSNOTICE IS FRIVOLOUS OR IS SOLELY PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-095 INTENDED TO CAUSE UNNECESSARY DELAY , PURSUANT TO PART 1 OF ARTICLEENTRY 17 OF THISTHE TITLEORDER 13,THERULING COURT SHALL AWARD COSTS AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES TO A PLAINTIFF PREVAILING ON THE MOTIONMOTION. .
(6)NOTWITHSTANDING INTHIS THESUBSECTION CASE(4), OFTHECOURTMAY,ONNOTICEDMOTIONANDFORGOODCAUSESHOWN,ORDER ANTHAT ORDERSPECIFIED GRANTINGDISCOVERY ORBE DENYINGCONDUCTED. A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IN COUNTY COURT , THE ORDER IS IMMEDIATELY APPEALABLE TOTHE DISTRICT COURT .INTHE CASE OFAN ORDERGRANTING OR DENYING A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IN DISTRICT COURTTHE ORDER IS IMMEDIATELY APPEALABLE TO THE COURT OF APPEALS .
(5) IN ANY ACTION SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION, A PREYAILING DEFENDANT ON A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IS ENTITLED TO RECOVER THE DEFENDANT'S ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS.
IF THE COURT FINDS THAT A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IS FRIVOLOUS OR IS SOLELY P A G E 4-SEN A TE BILL 26-095 INTENDED TO CAUSE UNNECESSARY DELAY, PURSUANT TO PART 1 OF ARTICLE 17 OF THIS TITLE 13, THE COURT SHALL AWARD COSTS AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES TO A PLAINTIFF PREVAILING ON THE MOTION.
(6) IN THE CASE OF AN ORDER GRANTING OR DENYING A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IN COUNTY COURT, THE ORDER IS IMMEDIATELY APPEALABLE TO THE DISTRICT COURT.
IN THE CASE OF AN ORDER GRANTING OR DENYING A SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS IN DISTRICT COURT, THE ORDER IS IMMEDIATELY APPEALABLE TO THE COURT OF APPEALS.
In Colorado Revised Statutes,Statutesadd add 13-22-203.5 as follows:
Sexual harassment or sexual misconduct dispute - determination ofofapplicability applicability - definitions.
(1) A Ss USED IN THIS SECTION,UNLESSSECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRESREQUIRES: :
(a) "PREDISPUTE ARBITRATION AGREEMENTAGREEMENT" " MEANS ANY AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE A DISPUTE THAT HAS NOT ARISEN AT THE TIME OF MAKING THE AGREEMENTAGREEMENT. .
(b) "PREDISPUTE JOINT-ACTION WAIVERWAIVER" " MEANS AN AGREEMENTAGREEMENT, , WHETHER OR NOT PART OF A PREDISPUTE ARBITRATION AGREEMENTAGREEMENT, ,THATTHAT PROHIBITS OR WAIVES THE RIGHTS OF A PARTY TO THE AGREEMENT FROM PARTICIPATING IN A JOINT ACTIONCLASSACTION, ACTIONCLASS ,ORACTION, OR COLLECTIVE ACTION INAJUDICIALIN ,ARBITRAL,ADMINISTRATIVEA ,OROTHERFORUMCONCERNINGJUDICIAL, ADISPUTEARBITRAL, THATHASNOTARISENATTHETIMEOFMAKINGTHEADMINISTRATIVE, AGREEMENTOROTHER .FORUM CONCERNING A DISPUTE THAT HAS NOT ARISEN ATTHETIME OF MAKING THE AGREEMENT.
(c) "SEXUALHARASSMENTDISPUTE"SEXUALHARASSMENTDISPUTE" "MEANSADISPUTERELATINGTOMEANS A DISPUTERELATINGTO CONDUCT THAT IS ALLEGED TO CONSTITUTE SEXUAL HARASSMENT PURSUANT TO THE "C"COLORADO OLORADOANTI-DISCRIMINATION AACT", NT-DISCRIMINATIONPARTS A3 CT",PARTSTO 38 TO8OF OFARTICLEARTICLE 34 OFTITLE 24,ORANYOTHERAPPLICABLEFEDERAL24, ,STATE,ORORANY TRIBALOTHERAPPLICABLE LAWFEDERAL, .STATE, OR TRIBAL LAW.
(d) "SEXUAL MISCONDUCT DISPUTEDISPUTE" "MEANSMEANS A DISPUTE INVOLVING SEXUAL MISCONDUCTMISCONDUCT, ,ASAS DEFINED IN SECTION13-80-103.7SECTION 13-80-103.7 (2).
(2) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OFLAWTOOF LAW TO THE CONTRARYCONTRARY, ,PA PAGEG E 5-SENATE BILL 26-095 A PREDISPUTE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT OR PREDISPUTE JOINTJOINT-ACTION ACTION WAIVER IS NOT VALID OR ENFORCEABLE UPON REQUEST OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHOALLEGESCONDUCTWHO ALLEGES CONDUCT THAT RESULTSINASEXUALHARASSMENTRESULTS IN A SEXUAL HARASSMENT DISPUTE OR A SEXUAL MISCONDUCT DISPUTEDISPUTE, , OR UPON REQUEST OF A NAMED REPRESENTATIVEOFAJOINTACTIONREPRESENTATIVEOFAJOINTACTION, ,CLASSACTIONCLASSACTION, ORCOLLECTIVEACTION THAT RESULTS IN A SEXUAL HARASSMENT DISPUTE OR A SEXUAL MISCONDUCT DISPUTEDISPUTE. .
(3) TTHIS HIS SECTION APPLIES TO AN AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATEARBITRATE. .
THE COURTCOURT, ,RATHERRATHER THAN AN ARBITRATORARBITRATOR, ,SHALLSHALL DETERMINE THE VALIDITY AND ENFORCEABILITY OF A PREDISPUTE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND PREDISPUTE JOINT-ACTION WAIVER REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE PARTY RESISTING ARBITRATION CHALLENGES THE PREDISPUTE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT OR PREDISPUTE JOINTJOINT-ACTION -ACTIONWAIVER, WAIVERSPECIFICALLY ,SPECIFICALLY OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER TERMS OF THE CONTRACT THAT CONTAIN A PREDISPUTE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT OR PREDISPUTE JOINTJOINT-ACTION ACTIONWAIVER. WAIVER , AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE PREDISPUTE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT OR PREDISPUTE JOINT -ACTION WAIVER DELEGATES VALIDITY AND ENFORCEABILITY DETERMINATIONS TO AN ARBITRATOR .
AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE PREDISPUTE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT OR PREDISPUTE JOINT-ACTION WAIVER DELEGATES VALIDITY AND ENFORCEABILITY DETERMINATIONS TO AN ARBITRATOR.
In Colorado Revised Statutes,Statutesadd add 13-90-101.5 as follows:
UUPON PON THE REQUEST OF A PARTY AND CONSENT OF BOTH PARTIESPARTIES, ,AA JUDGE SHALL ALLOW A FORENSIC SCIENTIST TO TESTIFY REMOTELY IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGPROCEEDING. .
In Colorado Revised Statutes,Statutesadd add 16-10-402.5 as follows:
Use ofofclosed-circuit closed-circuit television - victims ofofcertain certain offenses involving domestic violence, unlawful sexual behavior, stalking, or human trafficking - definitions.
(1) AAS S USED IN THIS SECTION,UNLESSSECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRESREQUIRES: :
(a) "CLOSED"CLOSED-CIRCUIT -CIRCUITTELEVISION" TELEVISION"MEANSMEANS A DIRECTDIRECT, ,CLOSEDCLOSED-LOOP LOOPPA PAGEG E 6-SENATE BILL 26-095 AUDIO AND VIDEO TRANSMISSION SYSTEM THAT ALLOWS PRIVATE VIEWING AND IS NOT PUBLICLY BROADCASTBROADCAST, ,ANDAND MAY INCLUDE THE USE OF OTHER DIGITAL OR WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIESTECHNOLOGIES. .
(b)(b)"DOMESTIC "DOMESTICVIOLENCEVIOLENCE" "HASTHEMEANINGSETFORTHINSECTIONHAS THE MEANING SETFORTH IN SECTION 18-6-800.3.
(c)(c)"HUMAN "HUMAN TRAFFICKING FOR INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDESERVITUDE" " HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 18-3-503.
(d) "H"HUMAN UMAN TRAFFICKING FOR SEXUAL SERVITUDESERVITUDE" " HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 18-3-504.
(e)(e)"STALKING" "STALKINGHAS "HASTHETHE MEANINGSETFORTHINSECTIONMEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 18-3-602.
(f) "U"UNLAWFUL NLAWFUL SEXUAL BEHAVIORBEHAVIOR" " MEANS UNLAWFUL SEXUAL BEHAVIOR DESCRIBED IN PART 44OF OF ARTICLE 3OF3 OF TITLE18.
(g)(g)"VICTIM-SURVIVOR" "VICTIM-SURVIVORMEANS "MEANSANINDIVIDUALWHOISALLEGEDTOAN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS ALLEGEDTO BE A VICTIM OF A CRIME CHARGED IN THE PRESENT CASE WHICH INVOLVES DOMESTIC VIOLENCEVIOLENCE, ,UNLAWFULUNLAWFUL SEXUAL BEHAVIORBEHAVIOR, ,STALKINGSTALKING, ,HUMANHUMAN TRAFFICKING FOR INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDESERVITUDE, ,OROR HUMAN TRAFFICKING FOR SEXUAL SERVITUDESERVITUDE. .
(2) (a)(aEXCEPT ECEPT AS PROVIDED INSUBSECTIONIN (4)OFTHISSECTIONSUBSECTION ,IN(4)OF ANYPROSECUTIONFORACRIMEINVOLVINGDOMESTICVIOLENCETHIS SECTION, IN ANY PROSECUTION FORACRIME INVOLVING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, UNLAWFUL SEXUAL BEHAVIORBEHAVIOR, , STALKING, HUMAN TRAFFICKING FOR INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDESERVITUDE, ,OROR HUMAN TRAFFICKING FOR SEXUAL SERVITUDESERVITUDE, ,THETHE COURT MAYMAY, ,UPONMOTIONOFAPARTYORUPONITSOWNMOTIONUPON ,ORDERTHATTHEMOTION VICTIM-SURVIVOROFA 'SPARTY OR UPON ITSOWNMOTION,ORDERTHATTHE VICTIM-SURVIVOR'S TESTIMONY BE TAKEN IN A ROOM OTHER THAN THE COURTROOM AND BE TELEVISED BY CLOSEDCLOSED-CIRCUIT -CIRCUIT TELEVISION IN THE COURTROOM IFIF: :
(I) THE TESTIMONY IS TAKEN DURING THE PROCEEDINGPROCEEDING; ;
(II)(IITHE TEJUDGEDETERMINESPURSUANTTOSUBSECTIONJUDGE (2)(b)(IIOFDETERMINES THISSECTIONTHATTESTIMONYBYTHEPURSUANTTOSUBSECTION VICTIM(2)(b)(IOF -SURVIVORINTHEPRESENCETHIS SECTION THATTESTIMONY BYTHE VICTIM-SURVIVOR INTHE PRESENCE OF THE DEFENDANT IN THE COURTROOM WOULD RESULT IN THE VICTIM-SURVIVOR SUFFERING SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTRESS OR TRAUMATRAUMA, , SUCH THAT THE VICTIMVICTIM-SURVIVOR -SURVIVOR WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO REASONABLY PAGEP A G E 7-SENATE BILL 26-095 COMMUNICATECOMMUNICATE; ;AND (III) CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR TESTIMONY .
(b)AND (I)(III)CLOSED-CIRCUIT TO OBTAIN AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE USE OF CLOSED -CIRCUIT TELEVISION FOREQUIPMENT TESTIMONYIS BYAVAILABLE A VICTIM -SURVIVOR ,A PARTY SHALL FILE A WRITTEN MOTION WITH THE COURT NO LESS THAN THIRTY-FIVE DAYS PRIORTO THE TRIAL.THE COURT MAY EXTEND THE TIME TO FILE A WRITTEN MOTION FOR GOODTESTIMONY. CAUSE .
(II)(b) THE(I) COURT SHALL HOLD A HEARING TO DETERMINEOBTAIN WHETHERAN TESTIMONYBYTHEVICTIMORDER -SURVIVORINTHEPRESENCEOFTHEDEFENDANTAUTHORIZING IN THE COURTROOMUSE WOULDOF RESULTCLOSED-CIRCUIT INTELEVISION THEFOR VICTIMTESTIMONY -SURVIVORBY SUFFERINGA SERIOUSVICTIM-SURVIVOR, EMOTIONALA DISTRESSPARTY ORSHALL TRAUMAFILE ,A SUCHWRITTEN THATMOTION WITH THE VICTIM-SURVIVORCOURT WOULDNO NOTLESS BETHAN ABLETHIRTY-FIVE TODAYS REASONABLYPRIORTO COMMUNICATETHE .TRIAL.
(c) O NLY THE PROSECUTINGCOURT ATTORNEY , THE ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANT ,AND THE JUDGE MAY QUESTIONEXTEND THE VICTIMTIME -SURVIVORTO WHENFILE THEA VICTIM-SURVIVORWRITTEN TESTIFIESMOTION BYFOR CLOSED-CIRCUITGOOD TELEVISION.CAUSE.
(d)(II)THE THEOPERATORSOFTHECLOSEDCOURT -CIRCUITTELEVISIONEQUIPMENT SHALL MAKEHOLD EVERYA EFFORTHEARING TO BEDETERMINE UNOBTRUSIVEWHETHER WHILETESTIMONY BYTHE VICTIM-SURVIVOR INTHE PRESENCE OFTHE DEFENDANT IN THE COURTROOM WOULD RESULT IN THE VICTIM-SURVIVOR ISSUFFERING TESTIFYING.SERIOUS EMOTIONAL DISTRESS OR TRAUMA, SUCH THAT THE VICTIM-SURVIVOR WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO REASONABLY COMMUNICATE.
(3)(c) (a) ONLY THE FOLLOWINGPROSECUTING INDIVIDUALSATTORNEY, MAYTHE BEATTORNEY INFOR THE ROOMDEFENDANT, WITHAND THE VICTIMJUDGE -SURVIVORMAY WHENQUESTION THE VICTIMVICTIM-SURVIVOR -SURVIVORWHEN THE VICTIM-SURVIVOR TESTIFIES BY CLOSEDCLOSED-CIRCUIT -CIRCUITTELEVISION. TELEVISIO:
(I)(d)THE OPERATORS OFTHECLOSED-CIRCUITTELEVISION EQUIPMENT SHALL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO BE UNOBTRUSIVE WHILE THE PROSECUTINGVICTIM-SURVIVOR ATTORNEYIS ;TESTIFYING.
(II)(3) (a)ONLY THE ATTORNEYFOLLOWING FORINDIVIDUALS MAY BE IN THE DEFENDANTROOM ;WITH THE VICTIM-SURVIVOR WHEN THE VICTIM-SURVIVOR TESTIFIES BY CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION:
(III)(I)THE TPROSECUTING HEATTORNEY; OPERATORS OF THE CLOSED -CIRCUIT TELEVISION EQUIPMENT ;
(IV)(II)THE AATTORNEY PERSONFOR WHOSE PRESENCE ,IN THE OPINIONDEFENDANT; OF THE COURT, CONTRIBUTESTOTHEWELFAREANDWELL -BEINGOFTHEVICTIM -SURVIVOR , INCLUDING ANINDIVIDUALWHOHAS DEALT WITH THE VICTIM -SURVIVOR IN A THERAPEUTIC SETTING ;AND PAGE 8-SENATE BILL 26-095 (V) T HE JURY.
(b)(III) DURINGTHEVICTIMTHE -SURVIVOROPERATORS STESTIMONYBYCLOSEDOF -CIRCUIT TELEVISION,THEJUDGEANDTHEDEFENDANT ,IFPRESENT SHALLREMAININ THE COURTROOMCLOSED-CIRCUIT .TELEVISION EQUIPMENT;
(c)(IV) A PERSON WHOSE PRESENCE, IN THE JUDGEOPINION ANDOF THE DEFENDANTCOURT, MUSTCONTRIBUTESTOTHE BEWELFARE ALLOWEDAND TOWELL-BEINGOFTHE COMMUNICATEVICTIM-SURVIVOR, WITHINCLUDING THEAN INDIVIDUALSINDIVIDUAL INWHO THEHAS ROOMDEALT WHEREWITH THE VICTIM-SURVIVORISTESTIFYINGBYANAPPROPRIATEELECTRONICMETHODVICTIM-SURVIVOR .IN A THERAPEUTIC SETTING;
(4)AND THISSECTIONDOESNOTPAGE APPLYIFTHE8-SENATE DEFENDANTBILL ISAPPEARING26-095 PRO(V) SE.THEJURY.
(5)(b) TDURINGTHE HISVICTIM-SURVIVOR'STESTIMONYBYCLOSED-CIRCUIT SECTIONTELEVISION,THEJUDGEANDTHEDEFENDANT,IFPRESENT,SHALLREMAININ DOES NOT APPLY IF THE VICTIMCOURTROOM. SURVIVOR TESTIFYINGIS,ATTHETIMEOFATRIAL ,ACHILDLESSTHANEIGHTEENYEARS OLD OR IS A PERSON WHO HAS AN INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 25.5-10-202.
C(C) LOSEDTHE CIRCUITJUDGE TELEVISIONTESTIMONYBYAVICTIMAND -SURVIVORAT THE TIMEDEFENDANT OFTRIALWHOMUST ISACHILDLESSTHANEIGHTEENBE YEARSOLDORWHOHASANINTELLECTUALALLOWED ORTO DEVELOPMENTALCOMMUNICATE DISABILITYWITH ISTHE GOVERNEDINDIVIDUALS BYIN SECTIONTHE 16-10-402.ROOM WHERE THE VICTIM-SURVIVORISTESTIFYING BYAN APPROPRIATE ELECTRONIC METHOD.
(6)(4) (a)THIS T HIS SECTION DOES NOT PRECLUDEAPPLY ,IF FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFYINGADEFENDANT ,THE PRESENCE OFBOTHTHE VICTIM SURVIVOR AND THE DEFENDANT INIS THEAPPEARING COURTROOMPRO ATSE. THE SAME TIME .
(b)(5) TTHIS HIS SECTION DOES NOT PRECLUDEAPPLY IF THE REMOVALVICTIM-SURVIVOR OFTESTIFYING THEIS, DEFENDANTATTHETIMEOFATRIAL, ,RATHERTHANACHILD THELESSTHAN VICTIMEIGHTEEN -SURVIVORYEARS ,FROMOLD THEOR COURTROOMIS UPONTHESTIPULATIONOFBOTHPARTIESANDTHEAPPROVALOFTHECOURTA .PERSON WHO HAS AN INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 25.5-10-202.
(c)CLOSED-CIRCUIT TTELEVISION HISTESTIMONY SECTIONBY DOESA NOTVICTIM-SURVIVOR PRECLUDEAT THE TIME OFTRIAL WHO IS A COURTCHILD FROMLESS TAKINGTHAN OTHEREIGHTEEN ,CONSTITUTIONALLYPERMISSIBLEMEASURESTOACCOMMODATETHEYEARS NEEDSOLD OFOR AWHO TESTIFYINGHAS VICTIMSURVIVORAN .INTELLECTUAL OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY rsGOVERNED BY SECTION 16-10-402.
(6) (a) THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRECLUDE, FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFYING A DEFENDANT, THE PRESENCE OF BOTH THE VICTIM-SURVIVOR AND THE DEFENDANT IN THE COURTROOM AT THE SAME TIME.
(b) THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE REMOVAL OF THE DEFENDANT, RATHER THAN THE VICTIM-SURVIVOR, FROM THE COURTROOM UPONTHESTIPULATIONOFBOTHPARTIESANDTHEAPPROVALOFTHECOURT.
(c) THIS SECTION DOES NOT PRECLUDE A COURT FROM TAKING OTHER, CONSTITUTIONALLY PERMISSIBLEMEASURESTOACCOMMODATETHE NEEDS OF A TESTIFYING VICTIM-SURVIVOR.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-31-315,24-31-315,amend amend(l)(a)as (1)(a) as follows:
(1)(a) Theannualin-servicetrainingprogramsmustincludeproperThe annual in-service training programs must include proper restraint and holds training, a two-hour anti-bias training program, PAGEA PA G E 9-SENATE BILL 26-095 TWOTWO-HOUR HOUR TRAINING TO IMPROVE A PEACE OFFICEROFFICER'S S UNDERSTANDING OF THE IMPACT OF TRAUMA ON VICTIMVICTIM-SURVIVORS -SURVIVORS OF CRIMES AND THE OPTIMAL WAY FOR A PEACE OFFICER TO RESPOND TO VICTIMVICTIM-SURVIVORS -SURVIVORS WHO ARE EXPERIENCING OR RESPONDING TO TRAUMATRAUMA, , and, in alternating years, either a two-hour community policing and community partnerships training program or a two-hour situation de-escalation training program.
(b) "Review board" means the Colorado sexual assault forensicfu1ensie medicalnredieal evidencee'1idenee RESPONSE review board, established in subsection (2) of this section.
(2) The Colorado sexual assault forensicfu1ensie medical evidenceevide11ee RESPONSE review board is established in the department to carry out the duties described in subsection (6) of this section and submit the report described in subsection (7) ofofthis this section.
(VI) ThreerepresentativesfromorganizationsthatprovideservicesThree representatives from organizations thatprovide services or advocate for communities that experience disproportionate rates of sexual assault;
and (VII) Uptothreemembers,atthediscretionofUp theattorneygeneral,to three members, at the discretion ofthe attorney general, whose contributions the attorney general determines would be valuable to PAGE 10-SENATEIO-SENATE BILL 26-095 the work ofofthe the review board;
and (VIII) AREPRESENTATIVEOFAMUNICIPALCRIMELABORATORYAREPRESENTATIVEOFAMUNICIPALCRIMELABORATORY;AND ;AND (IX) TTwo WOVICTIM-SURVIVORS, VICTIM SURVIVORS , ONE REPRESENTING A RURAL COMMUNITY AND ONE REPRESENTING A METRO AREA OR URBAN COMMUNITYCOMMUNITY; ;
and (II) A representative of the division of criminal justice in the department ofofpublic public safety who has oversight of federal and state victim service funding and victim rights compliance;Dcompliance; (III) AREPRESENTATIVE OF THE CRIME LABORATORY OPERATED BY THE C OLORADO BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .
AND (III) A REPRESENTATIVEOFTHECRIMELABORATORYOPERATEDBY THECOLORADOBUREAUOFINVESTIGATION.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-33.5-122, amend (1)(j)(I)(1)0)(1)as as follows:
Peace officer training and support fund - peace officertrainingandsupportdistribution-firstresponderdeathbenefitofficertrainingand supportdistribution -first responderdeath benefit administration - death benefit fund - rules - definitions - repeal.
(1)(1)Definitions. Definitions.Asusedinthissection,unlessthecontextotherwise requires:
(j)As (I)used "Permissibleinthis purpose"section, meansunlessthe thecontextotherwise initialreqmres: and continuing education and training for peace officers, INCLUDING TRAINING AND EDUCATION FOR TRAUMA INFORMED INVESTIGATIONS AND VICTIM-SURVIVORRESPONSEFORPEACEOFFICERS ,andthecompensationof peace officers.
U) (I) "Permissible purpose" means the initial and continuing education and training for peace officers, INCLUDING TRAINING AND EDUCATION FOR TRAUMA-INFORMED INVESTIGATIONS AND VICTIM-SURVIVORRESPONSEFORPEACEOFFICERS, and the compensationof peace officers.
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate PAGE 11-SENATE BILL 26-095 preservation ofofthe the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie~ McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSEHOUSEl l y THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________APPROVED e lT've-sJ.VY\~ \C\1..D]hoc rz.t>ot"V\-\ (Date and Time) _________________________________________1 JaredSTATE S.OF COLORADO l PAGE 12-SENATE BILL 26-095
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 12-SENATE BILL 26-095
Show all 114 changed rows (74 more)
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee of the Whole Amendment - Change from Passed to Lost
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
Sponsors
- Adrienne Benavidez · Cosponsor
- Y. Zokaie · Cosponsor
- R. Weinberg · Cosponsor
- B. Titone · Cosponsor
- T. Story · Cosponsor
- K. Stewart · Cosponsor
- L. Smith · Cosponsor
- E. Sirota · Cosponsor
- M. Rutinel · Cosponsor
- A. Paschal · Cosponsor
- K. Nguyen · Cosponsor
- J. McCluskie · Cosponsor
- M. Lukens · Cosponsor
- M. Lindsay · Cosponsor
- S. Lieder · Cosponsor
- R. Keltie · Cosponsor
- J. Joseph · Cosponsor
- J. Jackson · Cosponsor
- E. Hamrick · Cosponsor
- L. Goldstein · Cosponsor
- L. García · Cosponsor
- A. Flanell · Cosponsor
- M. Duran · Cosponsor
- C. Clifford · Cosponsor
- K. Brown · Cosponsor
- A. Boesenecker · Cosponsor
- J. Willford · Primary
- M. Froelich · Primary
- Mike Weissman · Primary
- Judy Amabile · Cosponsor
- Matt Ball · Cosponsor
- Jeff Bridges · Cosponsor
- Tony Exum · Cosponsor
- Julie Gonzales · Cosponsor
- Iman Jodeh · Cosponsor
- Janice Marchman · Cosponsor
- Marc Snyder · Cosponsor
- Katie Wallace · Cosponsor
- James Coleman · Cosponsor
- Cathy Kipp · Cosponsor
- Dylan Roberts · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 38 co-sponsors · 60 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- J. Willford
- M. Froelich
- Mike Weissman Democrat
Co-sponsors (38)
- Adrienne Benavidez
- Y. Zokaie
- R. Weinberg
- B. Titone
- T. Story
- K. Stewart
- L. Smith
- E. Sirota
- M. Rutinel
- A. Paschal
- K. Nguyen
- J. McCluskie
- M. Lukens
- M. Lindsay
- S. Lieder
- R. Keltie
- J. Joseph
- J. Jackson
- E. Hamrick
- L. Goldstein
- L. García
- A. Flanell
- M. Duran
- C. Clifford
- K. Brown
- A. Boesenecker
- Judy Amabile Democrat
- Matt Ball Democrat
- Jeff Bridges Democrat
- Tony Exum Democrat
- Julie Gonzales Democrat
- Iman Jodeh Democrat
- Janice Marchman Democrat
- Marc Snyder Democrat
- Katie Wallace Democrat
- James Coleman Democrat
- Cathy Kipp Democrat
- Dylan Roberts Democrat
Not signed on (60)
60 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 60 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 36% | 64% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Nay |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Nay |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Nay |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Nay |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Nay |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 19 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 95 do?
- The act requires a licensee, nurse, or certified midwife who performs a medical forensic examination to inform the victim-survivor about how to determine when the testing related to the examination is complete and how to obtain the results and records. The act subjects a cause of action against a person arising from any protected statement by a victim-survivor to a special motion to dismiss unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a reasonable likelihood that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. The act makes a predispute arbitration agreement and predispute joint-action waiver void and unenforceable upon request of an individual who alleges conduct that results in a sexual harassment dispute or a sexual misconduct dispute or upon request of a named representative of a joint action, class action, or collective action that results in a sexual harassment dispute or a sexual misconduct dispute. The act requires a judge to allow a forensic scientist to testify remotely in a criminal proceeding if a party requests and both parties consent to the remote testimony. The act authorizes the court to order that the testimony of a victim-survivor of domestic violence, unlawful sexual behavior, stalking, human trafficking for involuntary servitude, or human trafficking for sexual servitude be taken in a room other than the courtroom and be televised by closed-circuit television in the courtroom under certain circumstances. The act requires peace officer annual in-service training programs to include a 2-hour training to improve a peace officer's understanding of the impact of trauma on victim-survivors of crimes and the optimal way for a peace officer to respond to victim-survivors who are experiencing trauma and includes trauma-informed investigation and response training as a permissible use of peace officer training and support fund money. The act renames the Colorado sexual assault forensic medical evidence review board as the Colorado sexual assault response review board and adds 4 members to the board.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 95?
- SB 95 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, Y. Zokaie, R. Weinberg, B. Titone, T. Story, K. Stewart, L. Smith, E. Sirota, M. Rutinel, A. Paschal, K. Nguyen, J. McCluskie, M. Lukens, M. Lindsay, S. Lieder, R. Keltie, J. Joseph, J. Jackson, E. Hamrick, L. Goldstein, L. García, A. Flanell, M. Duran, C. Clifford, K. Brown, A. Boesenecker, J. Willford, M. Froelich, Mike Weissman (Democrat), Judy Amabile (Democrat), Matt Ball (Democrat), Jeff Bridges (Democrat), Tony Exum (Democrat), Julie Gonzales (Democrat), Iman Jodeh (Democrat), Janice Marchman (Democrat), Marc Snyder (Democrat), Katie Wallace (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), Cathy Kipp (Democrat), and Dylan Roberts (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 95?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 95?
- Track SB 95 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 95
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 95
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →