Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 26 D · 7 R cosponsors

HB 1009 — Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act

Last action — Governor Signed

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on June 03, 2026.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 62 sponsors

    4 primary, 58 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (26 D · 7 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

The bill mandates lethality assessments for peace officers responding to domestic violence incidents.

The Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act requires police to conduct assessments during domestic violence calls to identify high-risk victims. If a victim is determined to be high-risk, officers must connect them with a community advocate.

What this means for you
  • Workers: This means workers in law enforcement will receive mandatory training on lethality assessments to better support domestic violence victims.
  • Families: Families affected by domestic violence may have increased access to resources and support through the mandated assessments and advocacy connections.

Summary

The act creates the 'Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act', which requires peace officers to conduct a lethality assessment when responding to a domestic violence incident and include the completed lethality assessment in the incident report. A peace officer is not required to administer a lethality assessment if a victim is unavailable, not at the scene, incapacitated, or if circumstances otherwise make the administration of the lethality assessment impossible or impracticable. If the lethality assessment indicates that an individual is a high-risk victim, or if the lethality assessment does not indicate a victim is high-risk but a peace officer determines an individual is a high-risk victim based on the totality of the circumstances, the peace officer is required to immediately contact a community-based victim's advocate either by phone or in person and provide the high-risk victim the opportunity to speak with the advocate.     The act requires the attorney general's office, in consultation with a Colorado-based coalition that advocates for survivors of domestic violence, to develop a mandatory training for peace officers to learn how to administer the lethality assessment and provide victim referrals. No later than June 1, 2027, the attorney general is required to make the training available and offer assistance to law enforcement agencies in providing the training. Beginning July 1, 2027, the act requires each law enforcement agency to ensure that each peace officer employed by the agency has completed the mandatory training; except that a law enforcement agency that has provided training on the administration of lethality assessments prior to July 1, 2027, is not required to provide additional training.     Beginning January 2028, and each January thereafter, the act requires the attorney general's office to report to the general assembly certain information related to lethality assessments conducted in the previous calendar year. No later than January 31, 2030, the domestic violence fatality review board shall evaluate the effectiveness of mandatory lethality assessments and referrals to resources and submit the evaluation to the general assembly.     The act does not impose criminal, administrative, or civil liability on any person for an act or omission made in good faith related to administering a lethality assessment.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

137 added · 177 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to House Bill 1009 adds a note specifying that this bill has been prepared for the necessary signatures and provides directions on how to check the bill's status once it is signed by the Governor. This change is significant because it enhances transparency by guiding the public on where to find updated information regarding the legislation's progress. Understanding whether the bill is approved or modified is crucial for ensuring that constituents are informed about new laws related to domestic violence assessment protocols.

→
Previous
Latest
Second Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
NOTE:
26-0231.01 Shelby Ross x4510 HOUSE BILL 26-1009 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Duran and Gonzalez R., Barron, Bradley, Brooks, Brown, Caldwell, Camacho, Clifford, Froelich, Garcia, Goldstein, Hamrick, Jackson, Keltie, Lieder, Lindsay, Lukens, Mabrey, Marshall, Mauro, McCluskie, McCormick, Nguyen, Paschal, Rutinel, Rydin, Sirota, Smith, Stewart K., Stewart R., Story, Titone, Winter T.
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
SENATE SPONSORSHIP Wallace and Pelton B., Amabile, Ball, Benavidez, Bridges, Coleman, Cutter, Daugherty, Exum, Frizell, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Kirkmeyer, Kolker, Lindstedt, Marchman, Mullica, Pelton R., Rich, Roberts, Rodriguez, Simpson, Snyder, Sullivan, Weissman e n e 6 E a 0 A U , N g 2 S d r House Committees Senate Committees e A Judiciary Judiciary R Appropriations Appropriations r e A BILL FOR AN ACT n m 2 C ONCERNING USING A MANDATORY LETHALITY ASSESSMENT WHEN T n 2 N U 4 RESPONDING TO A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT .
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
E i r S a A R Bill Summary n (Note:
HOUSE BILL 26-1009 BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Duran and Gonzalez R., Barron, Bradley, Brooks,Brown,Caldwell,Camacho,Clifford,Froelich,Garcia,Goldstein, Hamrick, Jackson, Keltie, Lieder, Lindsay, Lukens, Mabrey, Marshall, Mauro, McCormick, Nguyen, Paschal, Rutinel, Rydin, Sirota, Smith, Stewart K., Stewart R., Story, Titone, Winter T., McCluskie;
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill e n passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that m 2 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at E n 2 U U 9 http://leg.colorado.gov.) O i c H a a R M The bill creates the "Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment r Act", which requires peace officers to conduct a lethality assessment 3 when responding to a domestic violence incident and include the results of the lethality assessment in the incident report.
also SENATOR(S) Wallace and Pelton B., Amabile, Ball, Benavidez, Bridges,Cutter,Daugherty, Exum,Frizell,GonzalesJ.,Hinrichsen,Jodeh, Kipp, Kirkmeyer, Kolker, Lindstedt, Marchman, Mullica, Pelton R., Rich, Roberts, Rodriguez, Simpson, Snyder, Sullivan, Weissman, Coleman.
If the lethality g assessmentindicatesthat an individual is a high-risk victim, or if a peace d 6 officerdeterminesanindividualisahigh-riskvictimbasedonthetotality E e 0 S R , U d h H 2 r Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
CONCERNING USING A MANDATORY LETHALITY ASSESSMENT WHEN RESPONDING TO A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT .
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
e a Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n M Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
e A ofthecircumstances,thepeaceofficerisrequiredtoimmediatelyconnect the victim to a victim's advocate either by phone or in person.
Thebillrequirestheattorneygeneral'soffice,incoordinationwith a Colorado-based coalition that advocates for survivors of domestic violence,todevelop a mandatorytraining for peace officers tolearnhow to administer the lethality assessment and provide victim referrals.
The bill requires each law enforcement agency to ensure that each peace officer employed by the agency has completed the mandatory training.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 18-6-806 as follows:
In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 18-6-807 as follows:
18-6-806.
18-6-807.
TE SHORT TITLE OF THIS SECTION IS THE "C OLORADO M ANDATORY L ETHALITY ASSESSMENT ACT".
T HE SHORT TITLE OF THIS SECTION IS THE Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
(2) Legislativedeclaration.TEGENERALASSEMBLYFINDSAND DECLARESTHATREQUIRINGLAWENFORCEMENTAGENCIESTOADMINISTER A STANDARDIZED , EVIDENCE-BASED LETHALITY ASSESSMENT WHEN RESPONDINGTOADOMESTICVIOLENCEINCIDENTWILLENSUREHIGH RISK VICTIMS PROMPTLY RECEIVE SAFETY RESOURCES AND REFERRALS .
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
"COLORADO M ANDATORY L ETHALITY A SSESSMENT A CT".
(2) Legislative declaration.
TE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FINDS AND DECLARES THAT REQUIRING LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO ADMINISTER A STANDARDIZED , EVIDENCE -BASED LETHALITY ASSESSMENT WHEN RESPONDING TO A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT WILL ENSURE HIGH -RISK VICTIMS PROMPTLY RECEIVE SAFETY RESOURCES AND REFERRALS .
A USED IN THIS SECTIUNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES :
AS USED IN THIS SECTION,UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES :
(a) "D OMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT " MEANS AN INCIDENT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ,AS DEFINED IN SECTIO18-6-800.3.
(a) "D OMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT " MEANS AN INCIDENT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION18-6-800.3.
(b) "H IGH-RISK VICTI" MEANS A VICTIM WHO IS DETERMINED HIGH RISK BY A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT OR BY A PEACE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (4)OF THIS SECTIO.
(b) "H IGH RISK VICTIM " MEANS A VICTIM WHO IS DETERMINED HIGH-RISKBYALETHALITYASSESSMENTORBYAPEACEOFFICERPURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (4) OF THIS SECTIO.
(c) "LETHALITY ASSESSMENT " MEANS A VALIDATED , EVIDENCE -BASED SCREENING TOOL THAT INCLUDES STANDARDIZED -2- 1009 QUESTIONS AND THAT IS ADMINISTERED BY A PEACE OFFICER WHEN RESPONDING TO A REPORT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
(c) "LETHALITY ASSESSMENT " MEANS A VALIDATED , EVIDENCE -BASED SCREENING TOOL THAT INCLUDES STANDARDIZED QUESTIONS AND THAT IS ADMINISTERED BY A PEACE OFFICER WHEN RESPONDING TO A REPORT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE .
(d) "EACEOFFICER "MEANSAPERSONCERTIFIEDBYTHE P.O.S.T.
(d) "PEACE OFFICER "MEANS A PERSON CERTIFIED BY THE P.O.S.T.
BOARD PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-31-305 WHO RESPONDS TO AND INVESTIGATES INITIAL REPORTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS PART OF THE PEACEOFFICER SROUTINEDUTIES .A"PEACEOFFICER "DOESNOTINCLUDE A PAROLE OR PROBATION OFFICER.
BOARD PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-31-305 WHO RESPONDS TO AND INVESTIGATES INITIAL REPORTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS PART OF THE PEACE OFFICER S ROUTINE DUTIES.
A PEACE OFFICER "DOES NOT INCLUDE A PAROLE OR PROBATION OFFICER .
(a) BEGINNING JULY 1, 2027A PEACE OFFICER IS REQUIRED TO CONDUCT A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT WHEN RESPONDING TO A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT AND INCLUDE THE COMPLETED LETHALITY ASSESSMENTINTHEINCIDENTREPORT .THISSUBSECTION(4)(a)DOESNOT REQUIREAPEACE OFFICERTOADMINISTERALETHALITYASSESSMENTIFA VICTIM IS UNAVAILABLE, NOT AT THE SCENE ,INCAPACITATED ,OR IF CIRCUMSTANCES OTHERWISE MAKE THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE LETHALITY ASSESSMENT IMPOSSIBLE OR IMPRACTICABLE.
(a) B EGINNING JULY 1, 2027,A PEACE OFFICER IS REQUIRED TO CONDUCT A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT WHEN RESPONDING TO A DOMESTIC VIOLENCEINCIDENTANDINCLUDETHECOMPLETEDLETHALITYASSESSMENT IN THE INCIDENT REPORT .
(b) I THE LETHALITY ASSESSMENT INDICATES THAT AN INDIVIDUAL IS A HIG-RISK VICTI, OR IF THE ASSESSMENT DOES NOT INDICATE THE VICTIM IS HIGRISK BUT A PEACE OFFICER DETERMINES THAT THE INDIVIDUALISAHIGH RISKVICTIMBASEDONTHE TOTALITY OF THECIRCUMSTANCES ,THEPEACEOFFICERSHALLIMMEDIATELYCONTACT A COMMUNITY -BASED VICTIM'S ADVOCATE ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 13-90-107 (1)(k)(II),HER BY PHONE OR IN PERSO,AND PROVIDE THE HIGH -RISK VICTIM THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH THE COMMUNITY BASED VICTIM'S ADVOCATE.
THIS SUBSECTION (4)(a)DOES NOT REQUIRE A PEACE OFFICER TO ADMINISTER A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT IF A VICTIM IS UNAVAILABLE ,NOT AT THE SCENE,INCAPACITATED ,OR IF CIRCUMSTANCES OTHERWISE MAKE THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE LETHALITY ASSESSMENT IMPOSSIBLE OR IMPRACTICABLE .
PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 26-1009 (b) FTHE LETHALITYASSESSMENT INDICATESTHAT ANINDIVIDUAL IS A HIGHRISK VICTIM, OR IF THE ASSESSMENT DOES NOT INDICATE THE VICTIM IS HIGH RISK BUT A PEACE OFFICER DETERMINES THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IS A HIGH -RISK VICTIM BASED ON THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES ,THE PEACE OFFICER SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT A COMMUNITY -BASEDVICTIM SADVOCATE ,ASDEFINEDINSECTION 13-90-107 (1)(k)(II),THER BY PHONE OR IN PERSON , AND PROVIDE THE HIGH RISK VICTIMTHEOPPORTUNITYTOSPEAKWITHTHECOMMUNITY -BASEDVICTIM S ADVOCATE .
(a) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFIC,IN CONSULTATION WITH A -3- 1009 C OLORADO BASED COALITION THAT ADVOCATES FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTICVIOLENCE ,SHALLDEVELOPAMANDATORYTRAININGFORPEACE OFFICERS TO LEARN HOW TO ADMINISTER THE LETHALITY ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDE VICTIM REFERRALS PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION(4)OF THIS SECTION.
(a) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFICE,IN CONSULTATION WITH A COLORADO -BASED COALITION THAT ADVOCATES FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ,SHALLDEVELOP A MANDATORY TRAINING FOR PEACE OFFICERSTOLEARNHOWTOADMINISTERTHE LETHALITYASSESSMENT AND PROVIDEVICTIMREFERRALSPURSUANTTOSUBSECTION (4)OFTHISSECTION .
AT A MINIMUM , THE TRAINING MUST ADDRESS LANGUAGE ACCESS.
A T A MINIMUM,THE TRAINING MUST ADDRESS LANGUAGE ACCESS .
(b) NOLATERTHAN UNE 1,2027,THEATTORNEYGENERALSHALL MAKETHEMANDATORYTRAININGAVAILABLEANDOFFERASSISTANCETO LAWENFORCEMENTAGENCIESINPROVIDINGTHEMANDATORYTRAINING .
(b) NO LATER THAN JUNE 1, 2027THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL MAKE THE MANDATORY TRAINING AVAILABLE AND OFFER ASSISTANCE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN PROVIDING THE MANDATORY TRAINING .
(c) BEGINNINGJULY 1, 2027EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALLENSURETHATEACHPEACEOFFICEREMPLOYEDBYTHEAGENCYHAS COMPLETED THE MANDATORY TRAINING DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (5).
(c) B EGINNING JULY 1, 2027,EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL ENSURE THAT EACH PEACE OFFICER EMPLOYED BY THE AGENCY HAS COMPLETED THE MANDATORY TRAINING DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (5).
ALAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY THAT HAS PROVIDED TRAININGONTHEADMINISTRATIONOFLETHALITYASSESSMENTSPRIORTO JULY 1, 2027,IS NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TRAINING PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION(5)(c).
A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY THAT HAS PROVIDED TRAINING ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF LETHALITY ASSESSMENTS PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2027, IS NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TRAINING PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (5)(c).
(a) BGINNING JANUARY 2028,ANDEACH JANUARYTHEREAFTER , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFICE SHALL REPORT THE TOTALNUMBER OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENTS IN THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEA,THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LETHALITY ASSESSMENTS CONDUCTED ,THE TOTAL NUMBER OF HIGH-RISK VICTIMS IDENTIFI,AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF REFERRALS MADE , AS PART OF THE OFFICES "SMART A CT" PRESENTATION REQUIRED PURSUANT TO PART2 OF ARTICLE7OF TITLE2.
(a) BEGINNING ANUARY 2028, AND EACH JANUARY THEREAFTER , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFICE SHALL REPORT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENTS IN THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR ,THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LETHALITY ASSESSMENTS CONDUCTED ,THE TOTAL NUMBER OF HIGH RISK VICTIMS IDENTIFIED,AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF REFERRALS MADE AS PART OFTHE OFFICE S"SMARTA CT"PRESENTATION REQUIRED PURSUANT TO PART 2 OF ARTICLE7 OF TITLE2.
(b) NO LATER THANJANUARY 31,2030,THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FATALITY REVIEW BOARD CREATED IN SECTION 24-31-702 SHALL EVALUATETHEEFFECTIVENESSOFMANDATORYLETHALITYASSESSMENTS -4- 1009 ANDREFERRALTO RESOURCESPURSUANTTOTHISSECTIONANDSUBMIT THE EVALUATION TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AND THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE , OR THEIR SUCCESSOR COMMITTEES .
PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1009 (b) NO LATER THAN JANUARY 31, 2030,THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FATALITYREVIEWBOARDCREATEDINSECTION 24-31-702 SHALLEVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MANDATORY LETHALITY ASSESSMENTS AND REFERRAL TO RESOURCES PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND SUBMIT THE EVALUATION TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ANDTHESENATEJUDICIARYCOMMITTEE ,ORTHEIRSUCCESSORCOMMITTEES .
(c) ACHLAWENFORCEMENTAGENCYTHATUTILIZESALETHALITY ASSESSMENTSHALLANNUALLYREPORTTHEFOLLOWINGINFORMATIONTO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFIC, IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL :
(c) EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY THAT UTILIZES A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT SHALL ANNUALLY REPORT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFICE,IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL :
(I) THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENTS THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY RESPONDED TO DURING THE PRECEDING CALENDAR YEAR ;
(I) TETOTALNUMBEROFDOMESTICVIOLENCEINCIDENTSTHELAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCYRESPONDEDTODURINGTHE PRECEDINGCALENDAR YEAR ;
(II) HETOTALNUMBEROFLETHALITYASSESSMENTSCONDUCTED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY DURING THE PRECEDING CALENDAR YEAR ;AND (III) THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LETHALITY ASSESSMENTS THAT RESULTED IN IDENTIFICATION OF A H-RISK VICTI.
(II) TE TOTAL NUMBER OF LETHALITY ASSESSMENTS CONDUCTED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY DURING THE PRECEDING CALENDAR YEAR ;AND (III) THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LETHALITY ASSESSMENTS THAT RESULTED IN IDENTIFICATION OF A HIGHISK VICTI.
(7) Nonliability.HIS SECTION DOES NOT IMPOSE CRIMINAL , ADMINISTRATIVE, OR CIVIL LIABILITY ON ANY PERSON FOR AN ACT OR OMISSIONMADEINGOODFAITHRELATEDTOADMINISTERINGALETHALITY ASSESSMENT ,INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED T,THE INTERPRETATION OR USE OFA LETHALITY ASSESSMENT,DECIDING WHETHER TO ADMINISTER A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT , OR DECLINING TO USE THE LETHALITY ASSESSMENT .
(7) Nonliability.
TIS SECTION DOES NOT IMPOSE CRIMINAL , ADMINISTRATIVE ,OR CIVIL LIABILITY ON ANY PERSON FOR AN ACT OR OMISSION MADE IN GOOD FAITH RELATED TO ADMINISTERING A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT ,INCLUDING,BUTNOTLIMITEDTO ,THEINTERPRETATIONORUSE OF A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT , DECIDING WHETHER TO ADMINISTER A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT , OR DECLINING TO USE THE LETHALITY ASSESSMENT .
Show all 44 changed rows (4 more)
Previous
Latest
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservationofthepublicpeace,health,orsafetyorforappropriationsfor -5- 1009 the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1009 the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
-6- 1009
____________________________ ____________________________ Julie McCluskie James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________ ____________________________ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 26-1009
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  3. Signed by the President of the Senate

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  7. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments

  8. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Appropriations

  9. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

  10. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  11. House Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

  12. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  13. House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations

  14. Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 58 co-sponsors · 40 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (58)

Not signed on (40)

40 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 40 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

BILL

Passed 33 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 21000
Republican 7201
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 33201
% of votes cast 92%6%0%3%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Not Voting
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Nay
Marc Catlin Republican Yea
Mark Baisley Republican Nay
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 8000
Republican 1101
Total 9101
% of votes cast 82%9%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Emily Sirota Democrat Yea
Junie Joseph Democrat Yea
Karen McCormick Democrat Yea
Kyle Brown Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Matt Soper Republican Not Voting
Rick Taggart Republican Yea
Scott Bottoms Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 7000
Republican 4000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Yea
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Yea
Lorena Garcia Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Yea
Rebecca Keltie Republican Yea
Scott Slaugh Republican Yea
Ty Winter Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1009 do?
The act creates the 'Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act', which requires peace officers to conduct a lethality assessment when responding to a domestic violence incident and include the completed lethality assessment in the incident report. A peace officer is not required to administer a lethality assessment if a victim is unavailable, not at the scene, incapacitated, or if circumstances otherwise make the administration of the lethality assessment impossible or impracticable. If the lethality assessment indicates that an individual is a high-risk victim, or if the lethality assessment does not indicate a victim is high-risk but a peace officer determines an individual is a high-risk victim based on the totality of the circumstances, the peace officer is required to immediately contact a community-based victim's advocate either by phone or in person and provide the high-risk victim the opportunity to speak with the advocate.     The act requires the attorney general's office, in consultation with a Colorado-based coalition that advocates for survivors of domestic violence, to develop a mandatory training for peace officers to learn how to administer the lethality assessment and provide victim referrals. No later than June 1, 2027, the attorney general is required to make the training available and offer assistance to law enforcement agencies in providing the training. Beginning July 1, 2027, the act requires each law enforcement agency to ensure that each peace officer employed by the agency has completed the mandatory training; except that a law enforcement agency that has provided training on the administration of lethality assessments prior to July 1, 2027, is not required to provide additional training.     Beginning January 2028, and each January thereafter, the act requires the attorney general's office to report to the general assembly certain information related to lethality assessments conducted in the previous calendar year. No later than January 31, 2030, the domestic violence fatality review board shall evaluate the effectiveness of mandatory lethality assessments and referrals to resources and submit the evaluation to the general assembly.     The act does not impose criminal, administrative, or civil liability on any person for an act or omission made in good faith related to administering a lethality assessment.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors HB 1009?
HB 1009 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, M. Weissman, T. Sullivan, M. Snyder, C. Simpson, R. Rodriguez, D. Roberts, J. Rich, R. Pelton, K. Mullica, J. Marchman, W. Lindstedt, C. Kolker, B. Kirkmeyer, C. Kipp, I. Jodeh, N. Hinrichsen, J. Gonzales, L. Frizell, T. Exum, L. Daugherty, L. Cutter, J. Coleman, J. Bridges, M. Ball, J. Amabile, Gretchen Rydin (Democrat), Emily Sirota (Democrat), Lesley Smith (Democrat), Rebekah Stewart (Democrat), Tammy Story (Democrat), Ty Winter (Republican), Tisha Mauro (Democrat), Julie McCluskie (Democrat), Amy Paschal (Democrat), L. García, Lori Goldstein (Democrat), Eliza Hamrick (Democrat), Rebecca Keltie (Republican), Sheila Lieder (Democrat), Mandy Lindsay (Democrat), Meghan Lukens (Democrat), Javier Mabrey (Democrat), K. Wallace, B. Pelton, Brandi Bradley (Republican), Kyle Brown (Democrat), Jarvis Caldwell (Republican), Sean Camacho (Democrat), Chad Clifford (Democrat), Meg Froelich (Democrat), Ryan Gonzalez (Republican), Carlos Barron (Republican), Kenny Nguyen (Democrat), Monica Duran (Democrat), Max Brooks (Republican), Jamie Jackson (Democrat), Bob Marshall (Democrat), Karen McCormick (Democrat), Manny Rutinel (Democrat), Katie Stewart (Democrat), and Brianna Titone (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1009?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 1009?
Track HB 1009 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1009

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1009

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →