Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act
Families affected by domestic violence may have increased access to resources and support through the mandated assessments and advocacy connections.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1009 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1009.
You're tracking HB 1009
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1009 — Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on June 03, 2026.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
62 sponsors
4 primary, 58 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (26 D · 7 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 9 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill mandates lethality assessments for peace officers responding to domestic violence incidents.
The Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act requires police to conduct assessments during domestic violence calls to identify high-risk victims. If a victim is determined to be high-risk, officers must connect them with a community advocate.
What this means for you
- Workers: This means workers in law enforcement will receive mandatory training on lethality assessments to better support domestic violence victims.
- Families: Families affected by domestic violence may have increased access to resources and support through the mandated assessments and advocacy connections.
Summary
The act creates the 'Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act', which requires peace officers to conduct a lethality assessment when responding to a domestic violence incident and include the completed lethality assessment in the incident report. A peace officer is not required to administer a lethality assessment if a victim is unavailable, not at the scene, incapacitated, or if circumstances otherwise make the administration of the lethality assessment impossible or impracticable. If the lethality assessment indicates that an individual is a high-risk victim, or if the lethality assessment does not indicate a victim is high-risk but a peace officer determines an individual is a high-risk victim based on the totality of the circumstances, the peace officer is required to immediately contact a community-based victim's advocate either by phone or in person and provide the high-risk victim the opportunity to speak with the advocate. The act requires the attorney general's office, in consultation with a Colorado-based coalition that advocates for survivors of domestic violence, to develop a mandatory training for peace officers to learn how to administer the lethality assessment and provide victim referrals. No later than June 1, 2027, the attorney general is required to make the training available and offer assistance to law enforcement agencies in providing the training. Beginning July 1, 2027, the act requires each law enforcement agency to ensure that each peace officer employed by the agency has completed the mandatory training; except that a law enforcement agency that has provided training on the administration of lethality assessments prior to July 1, 2027, is not required to provide additional training. Beginning January 2028, and each January thereafter, the act requires the attorney general's office to report to the general assembly certain information related to lethality assessments conducted in the previous calendar year. No later than January 31, 2030, the domestic violence fatality review board shall evaluate the effectiveness of mandatory lethality assessments and referrals to resources and submit the evaluation to the general assembly. The act does not impose criminal, administrative, or civil liability on any person for an act or omission made in good faith related to administering a lethality assessment.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
137 added · 177 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to House Bill 1009 adds a note specifying that this bill has been prepared for the necessary signatures and provides directions on how to check the bill's status once it is signed by the Governor. This change is significant because it enhances transparency by guiding the public on where to find updated information regarding the legislation's progress. Understanding whether the bill is approved or modified is crucial for ensuring that constituents are informed about new laws related to domestic violence assessment protocols.
SecondNOTE: Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
26-0231.01This Shelbybill Rosshas x4510been HOUSEprepared BILLfor 26-1009the HOUSEsignatures SPONSORSHIPof Duranthe andappropriate Gonzalezlegislative R.,officers Barron,and Bradley,the Brooks,Governor. Brown, Caldwell, Camacho, Clifford, Froelich, Garcia, Goldstein, Hamrick, Jackson, Keltie, Lieder, Lindsay, Lukens, Mabrey, Marshall, Mauro, McCluskie, McCormick, Nguyen, Paschal, Rutinel, Rydin, Sirota, Smith, Stewart K., Stewart R., Story, Titone, Winter T.
SENATETo SPONSORSHIPdetermine Wallacewhether andthe PeltonGovernor B.,has Amabile,signed Ball,the Benavidez,bill Bridges,or Coleman,taken Cutter,other Daugherty,action Exum,on Frizell,it, Gonzalesplease J.,consult Hinrichsen,the Jodeh,legislative Kipp,status Kirkmeyer,sheet, Kolker,the Lindstedt,legislative Marchman,history, Mullica,or Peltonthe R.,Session Rich,Laws. Roberts, Rodriguez, Simpson, Snyder, Sullivan, Weissman e n e 6 E a 0 A U , N g 2 S d r House Committees Senate Committees e A Judiciary Judiciary R Appropriations Appropriations r e A BILL FOR AN ACT n m 2 C ONCERNING USING A MANDATORY LETHALITY ASSESSMENT WHEN T n 2 N U 4 RESPONDING TO A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT .
EHOUSE iBILL r26-1009 SBY aREPRESENTATIVE(S) ADuran Rand BillGonzalez SummaryR., nBarron, (Note:Bradley, Brooks,Brown,Caldwell,Camacho,Clifford,Froelich,Garcia,Goldstein, Hamrick, Jackson, Keltie, Lieder, Lindsay, Lukens, Mabrey, Marshall, Mauro, McCormick, Nguyen, Paschal, Rutinel, Rydin, Sirota, Smith, Stewart K., Stewart R., Story, Titone, Winter T., McCluskie;
Thisalso summarySENATOR(S) appliesWallace to this bill as introduced and doesPelton notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.IfthisbillB., eAmabile, nBall, passesBenavidez, thirdBridges,Cutter,Daugherty, readingExum,Frizell,GonzalesJ.,Hinrichsen,Jodeh, inKipp, theKirkmeyer, houseKolker, ofLindstedt, introduction,Marchman, aMullica, billPelton summaryR., thatRich, mRoberts, 2Rodriguez, appliesSimpson, toSnyder, theSullivan, reengrossedWeissman, versionColeman. of this bill will be available at E n 2 U U 9 http://leg.colorado.gov.) O i c H a a R M The bill creates the "Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment r Act", which requires peace officers to conduct a lethality assessment 3 when responding to a domestic violence incident and include the results of the lethality assessment in the incident report.
IfCONCERNING theUSING lethalityA gMANDATORY assessmentindicatesthatLETHALITY anASSESSMENT individualWHEN isRESPONDING aTO high-riskA victim,DOMESTIC orVIOLENCE ifINCIDENT a. peace d 6 officerdeterminesanindividualisahigh-riskvictimbasedonthetotality E e 0 S R , U d h H 2 r Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
e a Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n M Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
e A ofthecircumstances,thepeaceofficerisrequiredtoimmediatelyconnect the victim to a victim's advocate either by phone or in person.
Thebillrequirestheattorneygeneral'soffice,incoordinationwith a Colorado-based coalition that advocates for survivors of domestic violence,todevelop a mandatorytraining for peace officers tolearnhow to administer the lethality assessment and provide victim referrals.
The bill requires each law enforcement agency to ensure that each peace officer employed by the agency has completed the mandatory training.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 18-6-80618-6-807 as follows:
18-6-806.18-6-807.
TET HE SHORT TITLE OF THIS SECTION IS THE "CCapital OLORADOletters Mor ANDATORYbold L& ETHALITYitalic ASSESSMENTnumbers ACT".indicate new material added to existing law;
(2)dashes Legislativedeclaration.TEGENERALASSEMBLYFINDSANDthrough DECLARESTHATREQUIRINGLAWENFORCEMENTAGENCIESTOADMINISTERwords Aor STANDARDIZEDnumbers ,indicate EVIDENCE-BASEDdeletions LETHALITYfrom ASSESSMENTexisting WHENlaw RESPONDINGTOADOMESTICVIOLENCEINCIDENTWILLENSUREHIGHand RISKsuch VICTIMSmaterial PROMPTLYis RECEIVEnot SAFETYpart RESOURCESof ANDthe REFERRALSact. .
"COLORADO M ANDATORY L ETHALITY A SSESSMENT A CT".
(2) Legislative declaration.
TE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FINDS AND DECLARES THAT REQUIRING LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO ADMINISTER A STANDARDIZED , EVIDENCE -BASED LETHALITY ASSESSMENT WHEN RESPONDING TO A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT WILL ENSURE HIGH -RISK VICTIMS PROMPTLY RECEIVE SAFETY RESOURCES AND REFERRALS .
AAS USED IN THIS SECTIUNLESSSECTION,UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES :
(a) "D OMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT " MEANS AN INCIDENT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ,AS DEFINED IN SECTIO18-6-800.3.SECTION18-6-800.3.
(b) "H IGH-RISKIGH VICTI"RISK VICTIM " MEANS A VICTIM WHO IS DETERMINED HIGHHIGH-RISKBYALETHALITYASSESSMENTORBYAPEACEOFFICERPURSUANT RISK BY A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT OR BY A PEACE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (4)OF(4) OF THIS SECTIO.
(c) "LETHALITY ASSESSMENT " MEANS A VALIDATED , EVIDENCE -BASED SCREENING TOOL THAT INCLUDES STANDARDIZED -2- 1009 QUESTIONS AND THAT IS ADMINISTERED BY A PEACE OFFICER WHEN RESPONDING TO A REPORT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.VIOLENCE .
(d) "EACEOFFICER"PEACE "MEANSAPERSONCERTIFIEDBYTHEOFFICER "MEANS A PERSON CERTIFIED BY THE P.O.S.T.
BOARD PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-31-305 WHO RESPONDS TO AND INVESTIGATES INITIAL REPORTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS PART OF THE PEACEOFFICERPEACE SROUTINEDUTIESOFFICER .A"PEACEOFFICERS "DOESNOTINCLUDEROUTINE ADUTIES. PAROLE OR PROBATION OFFICER.
A PEACE OFFICER "DOES NOT INCLUDE A PAROLE OR PROBATION OFFICER .
(a) BEGINNINGB EGINNING JULY 1, 2027A2027,A PEACE OFFICER IS REQUIRED TO CONDUCT A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT WHEN RESPONDING TO A DOMESTIC VIOLENCEVIOLENCEINCIDENTANDINCLUDETHECOMPLETEDLETHALITYASSESSMENT INCIDENTIN AND INCLUDE THE COMPLETEDINCIDENT LETHALITYREPORT ASSESSMENTINTHEINCIDENTREPORT. .THISSUBSECTION(4)(a)DOESNOT REQUIREAPEACE OFFICERTOADMINISTERALETHALITYASSESSMENTIFA VICTIM IS UNAVAILABLE, NOT AT THE SCENE ,INCAPACITATED ,OR IF CIRCUMSTANCES OTHERWISE MAKE THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE LETHALITY ASSESSMENT IMPOSSIBLE OR IMPRACTICABLE.
(b)THIS ISUBSECTION THE(4)(a)DOES LETHALITYNOT ASSESSMENTREQUIRE INDICATESA THATPEACE ANOFFICER INDIVIDUALTO ISADMINISTER A HIG-RISKLETHALITY VICTI,ASSESSMENT OR IF THEA ASSESSMENT DOES NOT INDICATE THE VICTIM IS HIGRISKUNAVAILABLE BUT,NOT AAT PEACE OFFICER DETERMINES THAT THE INDIVIDUALISAHIGHSCENE,INCAPACITATED RISKVICTIMBASEDONTHE,OR TOTALITYIF OFCIRCUMSTANCES THECIRCUMSTANCESOTHERWISE ,THEPEACEOFFICERSHALLIMMEDIATELYCONTACTMAKE A COMMUNITY -BASED VICTIM'S ADVOCATE ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 13-90-107 (1)(k)(II),HER BY PHONE OR IN PERSO,AND PROVIDE THE HIGHADMINISTRATION -RISKOF VICTIM THE OPPORTUNITYLETHALITY TOASSESSMENT SPEAKIMPOSSIBLE WITHOR THEIMPRACTICABLE COMMUNITY. BASED VICTIM'S ADVOCATE.
PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 26-1009 (b) FTHE LETHALITYASSESSMENT INDICATESTHAT ANINDIVIDUAL IS A HIGHRISK VICTIM, OR IF THE ASSESSMENT DOES NOT INDICATE THE VICTIM IS HIGH RISK BUT A PEACE OFFICER DETERMINES THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IS A HIGH -RISK VICTIM BASED ON THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES ,THE PEACE OFFICER SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT A COMMUNITY -BASEDVICTIM SADVOCATE ,ASDEFINEDINSECTION 13-90-107 (1)(k)(II),THER BY PHONE OR IN PERSON , AND PROVIDE THE HIGH RISK VICTIMTHEOPPORTUNITYTOSPEAKWITHTHECOMMUNITY -BASEDVICTIM S ADVOCATE .
(a) THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFIC,INOFFICE,IN CONSULTATION WITH A -3-COLORADO 1009-BASED C OLORADO BASED COALITION THAT ADVOCATES FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTICVIOLENCEDOMESTIC ,SHALLDEVELOPAMANDATORYTRAININGFORPEACEVIOLENCE OFFICERS,SHALLDEVELOP TOA LEARNMANDATORY HOWTRAINING TOFOR ADMINISTERPEACE THEOFFICERSTOLEARNHOWTOADMINISTERTHE LETHALITYLETHALITYASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDEPROVIDEVICTIMREFERRALSPURSUANTTOSUBSECTION VICTIM(4)OFTHISSECTION REFERRALS. PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION(4)OF THIS SECTION.
AT A MINIMUMT ,A THEMINIMUM,THE TRAINING MUST ADDRESS LANGUAGE ACCESS.ACCESS .
(b) NOLATERTHANNO UNELATER 1,2027,THEATTORNEYGENERALSHALLTHAN MAKETHEMANDATORYTRAININGAVAILABLEANDOFFERASSISTANCETOJUNE LAWENFORCEMENTAGENCIESINPROVIDINGTHEMANDATORYTRAINING1, 2027THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL MAKE THE MANDATORY TRAINING AVAILABLE AND OFFER ASSISTANCE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES IN PROVIDING THE MANDATORY TRAINING .
(c) BEGINNINGJULYB EGINNING JULY 1, 2027EACH2027,EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALLENSURETHATEACHPEACEOFFICEREMPLOYEDBYTHEAGENCYHASSHALL ENSURE THAT EACH PEACE OFFICER EMPLOYED BY THE AGENCY HAS COMPLETED THE MANDATORY TRAINING DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (5).
ALAWA LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY THAT HAS PROVIDED TRAININGONTHEADMINISTRATIONOFLETHALITYASSESSMENTSPRIORTOTRAINING ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF LETHALITY ASSESSMENTS PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2027,IS2027, IS NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TRAINING PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION(5)(c).SUBSECTION (5)(c).
(a) BGINNINGBEGINNING JANUARYANUARY 2028,ANDEACH2028, JANUARYTHEREAFTERAND EACH JANUARY THEREAFTER , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFICE SHALL REPORT THE TOTALNUMBERTOTAL NUMBER OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENTS IN THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEA,THEYEAR ,THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LETHALITY ASSESSMENTS CONDUCTED ,THE TOTAL NUMBER OF HIGH-RISKHIGH RISK VICTIMS IDENTIFI,ANDIDENTIFIED,AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF REFERRALS MADE , AS PART OFOFTHE THEOFFICE OFFICESS"SMARTA "SMARTCT"PRESENTATION A CT" PRESENTATION REQUIRED PURSUANT TO PART2PART 2 OF ARTICLE7OFARTICLE7 OF TITLE2.
PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1009 (b) NO LATER THANJANUARYTHAN 31,2030,THEJANUARY 31, 2030,THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FATALITYFATALITYREVIEWBOARDCREATEDINSECTION REVIEW24-31-702 BOARDSHALLEVALUATE CREATEDTHE INEFFECTIVENESS SECTIONOF 24-31-702MANDATORY SHALLLETHALITY EVALUATETHEEFFECTIVENESSOFMANDATORYLETHALITYASSESSMENTSASSESSMENTS -4-AND 1009REFERRAL ANDREFERRALTOTO RESOURCESPURSUANTTOTHISSECTIONANDSUBMITRESOURCES PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND SUBMIT THE EVALUATION TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ANDANDTHESENATEJUDICIARYCOMMITTEE THE,ORTHEIRSUCCESSORCOMMITTEES SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE , OR THEIR SUCCESSOR COMMITTEES .
(c) ACHLAWENFORCEMENTAGENCYTHATUTILIZESALETHALITYEACH ASSESSMENTSHALLANNUALLYREPORTTHEFOLLOWINGINFORMATIONTOLAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY THAT UTILIZES A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT SHALL ANNUALLY REPORT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFIC,OFFICE,IN IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL :
(I) THETETOTALNUMBEROFDOMESTICVIOLENCEINCIDENTSTHELAW TOTAL NUMBER OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENTS THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCYAGENCYRESPONDEDTODURINGTHE RESPONDEDPRECEDINGCALENDAR TO DURING THE PRECEDING CALENDAR YEAR ;
(II) HETOTALNUMBEROFLETHALITYASSESSMENTSCONDUCTEDTE TOTAL NUMBER OF LETHALITY ASSESSMENTS CONDUCTED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY DURING THE PRECEDING CALENDAR YEAR ;AND (III) THE TOTAL NUMBER OF LETHALITY ASSESSMENTS THAT RESULTED IN IDENTIFICATION OF A H-RISKHIGHISK VICTI.
(7) Nonliability.HISNonliability. SECTION DOES NOT IMPOSE CRIMINAL , ADMINISTRATIVE, OR CIVIL LIABILITY ON ANY PERSON FOR AN ACT OR OMISSIONMADEINGOODFAITHRELATEDTOADMINISTERINGALETHALITY ASSESSMENT ,INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED T,THE INTERPRETATION OR USE OFA LETHALITY ASSESSMENT,DECIDING WHETHER TO ADMINISTER A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT , OR DECLINING TO USE THE LETHALITY ASSESSMENT .
TIS SECTION DOES NOT IMPOSE CRIMINAL , ADMINISTRATIVE ,OR CIVIL LIABILITY ON ANY PERSON FOR AN ACT OR OMISSION MADE IN GOOD FAITH RELATED TO ADMINISTERING A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT ,INCLUDING,BUTNOTLIMITEDTO ,THEINTERPRETATIONORUSE OF A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT , DECIDING WHETHER TO ADMINISTER A LETHALITY ASSESSMENT , OR DECLINING TO USE THE LETHALITY ASSESSMENT .
Show all 44 changed lines (4 more)
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservationofthepublicpeace,health,orsafetyorforappropriationsforpreservation -5-of 1009the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1009 the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
-6-____________________________ 1009____________________________ Julie McCluskie James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________ ____________________________ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 26-1009
Show all 44 changed rows (4 more)
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
Sponsors
- Adrienne Benavidez · Cosponsor
- M. Weissman · Cosponsor
- T. Sullivan · Cosponsor
- M. Snyder · Cosponsor
- C. Simpson · Cosponsor
- R. Rodriguez · Cosponsor
- D. Roberts · Cosponsor
- J. Rich · Cosponsor
- R. Pelton · Cosponsor
- K. Mullica · Cosponsor
- J. Marchman · Cosponsor
- W. Lindstedt · Cosponsor
- C. Kolker · Cosponsor
- B. Kirkmeyer · Cosponsor
- C. Kipp · Cosponsor
- I. Jodeh · Cosponsor
- N. Hinrichsen · Cosponsor
- J. Gonzales · Cosponsor
- L. Frizell · Cosponsor
- T. Exum · Cosponsor
- L. Daugherty · Cosponsor
- L. Cutter · Cosponsor
- J. Coleman · Cosponsor
- J. Bridges · Cosponsor
- M. Ball · Cosponsor
- J. Amabile · Cosponsor
- Gretchen Rydin · Cosponsor
- Emily Sirota · Cosponsor
- Lesley Smith · Cosponsor
- Rebekah Stewart · Cosponsor
- Tammy Story · Cosponsor
- Ty Winter · Cosponsor
- Tisha Mauro · Cosponsor
- Julie McCluskie · Cosponsor
- Amy Paschal · Cosponsor
- L. García · Cosponsor
- Lori Goldstein · Cosponsor
- Eliza Hamrick · Cosponsor
- Rebecca Keltie · Cosponsor
- Sheila Lieder · Cosponsor
- Mandy Lindsay · Cosponsor
- Meghan Lukens · Cosponsor
- Javier Mabrey · Cosponsor
- K. Wallace · Primary
- B. Pelton · Primary
- Brandi Bradley · Cosponsor
- Kyle Brown · Cosponsor
- Jarvis Caldwell · Cosponsor
- Sean Camacho · Cosponsor
- Chad Clifford · Cosponsor
- Meg Froelich · Cosponsor
- Ryan Gonzalez · Primary
- Carlos Barron · Cosponsor
- Kenny Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Monica Duran · Primary
- Max Brooks · Cosponsor
- Jamie Jackson · Cosponsor
- Bob Marshall · Cosponsor
- Karen McCormick · Cosponsor
- Manny Rutinel · Cosponsor
- Katie Stewart · Cosponsor
- Brianna Titone · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 58 co-sponsors · 40 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- K. Wallace
- B. Pelton
- Ryan Gonzalez Republican
- Monica Duran Democrat
Co-sponsors (58)
- Adrienne Benavidez
- M. Weissman
- T. Sullivan
- M. Snyder
- C. Simpson
- R. Rodriguez
- D. Roberts
- J. Rich
- R. Pelton
- K. Mullica
- J. Marchman
- W. Lindstedt
- C. Kolker
- B. Kirkmeyer
- C. Kipp
- I. Jodeh
- N. Hinrichsen
- J. Gonzales
- L. Frizell
- T. Exum
- L. Daugherty
- L. Cutter
- J. Coleman
- J. Bridges
- M. Ball
- J. Amabile
- Gretchen Rydin Democrat
- Emily Sirota Democrat
- Lesley Smith Democrat
- Rebekah Stewart Democrat
- Tammy Story Democrat
- Ty Winter Republican
- Tisha Mauro Democrat
- Julie McCluskie Democrat
- Amy Paschal Democrat
- L. García
- Lori Goldstein Democrat
- Eliza Hamrick Democrat
- Rebecca Keltie Republican
- Sheila Lieder Democrat
- Mandy Lindsay Democrat
- Meghan Lukens Democrat
- Javier Mabrey Democrat
- Brandi Bradley Republican
- Kyle Brown Democrat
- Jarvis Caldwell Republican
- Sean Camacho Democrat
- Chad Clifford Democrat
- Meg Froelich Democrat
- Carlos Barron Republican
- Kenny Nguyen Democrat
- Max Brooks Republican
- Jamie Jackson Democrat
- Bob Marshall Democrat
- Karen McCormick Democrat
- Manny Rutinel Democrat
- Katie Stewart Democrat
- Brianna Titone Democrat
Not signed on (40)
40 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 40 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 6% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 9% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Not Voting |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Yea |
| Ty Winter | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1009 do?
- The act creates the 'Colorado Mandatory Lethality Assessment Act', which requires peace officers to conduct a lethality assessment when responding to a domestic violence incident and include the completed lethality assessment in the incident report. A peace officer is not required to administer a lethality assessment if a victim is unavailable, not at the scene, incapacitated, or if circumstances otherwise make the administration of the lethality assessment impossible or impracticable. If the lethality assessment indicates that an individual is a high-risk victim, or if the lethality assessment does not indicate a victim is high-risk but a peace officer determines an individual is a high-risk victim based on the totality of the circumstances, the peace officer is required to immediately contact a community-based victim's advocate either by phone or in person and provide the high-risk victim the opportunity to speak with the advocate. The act requires the attorney general's office, in consultation with a Colorado-based coalition that advocates for survivors of domestic violence, to develop a mandatory training for peace officers to learn how to administer the lethality assessment and provide victim referrals. No later than June 1, 2027, the attorney general is required to make the training available and offer assistance to law enforcement agencies in providing the training. Beginning July 1, 2027, the act requires each law enforcement agency to ensure that each peace officer employed by the agency has completed the mandatory training; except that a law enforcement agency that has provided training on the administration of lethality assessments prior to July 1, 2027, is not required to provide additional training. Beginning January 2028, and each January thereafter, the act requires the attorney general's office to report to the general assembly certain information related to lethality assessments conducted in the previous calendar year. No later than January 31, 2030, the domestic violence fatality review board shall evaluate the effectiveness of mandatory lethality assessments and referrals to resources and submit the evaluation to the general assembly. The act does not impose criminal, administrative, or civil liability on any person for an act or omission made in good faith related to administering a lethality assessment.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors HB 1009?
- HB 1009 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, M. Weissman, T. Sullivan, M. Snyder, C. Simpson, R. Rodriguez, D. Roberts, J. Rich, R. Pelton, K. Mullica, J. Marchman, W. Lindstedt, C. Kolker, B. Kirkmeyer, C. Kipp, I. Jodeh, N. Hinrichsen, J. Gonzales, L. Frizell, T. Exum, L. Daugherty, L. Cutter, J. Coleman, J. Bridges, M. Ball, J. Amabile, Gretchen Rydin (Democrat), Emily Sirota (Democrat), Lesley Smith (Democrat), Rebekah Stewart (Democrat), Tammy Story (Democrat), Ty Winter (Republican), Tisha Mauro (Democrat), Julie McCluskie (Democrat), Amy Paschal (Democrat), L. García, Lori Goldstein (Democrat), Eliza Hamrick (Democrat), Rebecca Keltie (Republican), Sheila Lieder (Democrat), Mandy Lindsay (Democrat), Meghan Lukens (Democrat), Javier Mabrey (Democrat), K. Wallace, B. Pelton, Brandi Bradley (Republican), Kyle Brown (Democrat), Jarvis Caldwell (Republican), Sean Camacho (Democrat), Chad Clifford (Democrat), Meg Froelich (Democrat), Ryan Gonzalez (Republican), Carlos Barron (Republican), Kenny Nguyen (Democrat), Monica Duran (Democrat), Max Brooks (Republican), Jamie Jackson (Democrat), Bob Marshall (Democrat), Karen McCormick (Democrat), Manny Rutinel (Democrat), Katie Stewart (Democrat), and Brianna Titone (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1009?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1009?
- Track HB 1009 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1009
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1009
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →