Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted 19 D cosponsors

SB 125 — Disability Rights Protections in Public Schools

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 29, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 37 sponsors

    4 primary, 33 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (19 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill protects the rights of students with disabilities in public schools.

This bill prohibits public schools from discriminating against students with disabilities and requires them to provide equal access to programs and services. It also mandates that schools create grievance processes and ensure accommodations for students and their families.

What this means for you
  • Workers: School employees will have guidelines for implementing disability rights protections and handling complaints appropriately.
  • Families: Families of students with disabilities will have more support and formal processes to address discrimination in schools.
  • Healthcare: Healthcare professionals working with families will need to understand the legal rights of students with disabilities in educational settings.

Summary

The act prohibits a school district, a charter school authorized by a school district, a charter school authorized by the state charter school institute, the state charter school institute, or a board of cooperative services that operates one or more public schools (LEP) from discriminating against an individual who has a disability and who is entitled to a free public education (qualified student with a disability) based on the student's disability.     The act requires an LEP to allow a qualified student with a disability to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the provider's programs, services, or activities in the same manner as a student without a disability. When providing any aid, benefit, or service, an LEP shall not, based on disability:Deny a qualified student with a disability an opportunity to participate in or benefit from the aid, benefit, or service in a manner that is equal to that afforded to other students;Provide a qualified student with a disability with an aid, benefit, or service that is not as effective as that provided to other students;Provide different or separate aids, benefits, or services to a qualified student with a disability unless such action is necessary to provide a qualified student with a disability with aids, benefits, or services that are as effective as those provided to other students;Aid or perpetuate discrimination against a qualified student with a disability by providing significant assistance to an agency, an organization, or a person that discriminates on the basis of disability in providing any aid, benefit, or service to beneficiaries of the LEP's educational program or activity; orOtherwise limit a qualified student with a disability in the enjoyment of any right, privilege, advantage, or opportunity enjoyed by students without disabilities who receive an educational aid, benefit, or service.     The act prohibits an LEP from using criteria or methods of administration that:Have the effect of subjecting a qualified student with a disability to discrimination on the basis of their disability;Have the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the LEP's program or activity with respect to a qualified student with a disability; orPerpetuate the discrimination of another LEP if both LEPs are subject to common administrative control or are agencies of the state.     In determining the site or location of a facility, an LEP may not make selections that:Exclude a qualified student with a disability from a facility or deny a qualified student with a disability the benefits of a facility, or that otherwise subject a qualified student with a disability to discrimination; orHave the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially impairing the accomplishment of the objectives of the program or activity with respect to a qualified student with a disability.     The act requires an LEP to:Adopt a disability rights grievance process that incorporates appropriate due process standards and that is satisfied by following the grievance procedures in section 504 of the federal 'Rehabilitation Act of 1973' and to designate at least one responsible employee to oversee compliance with the provisions of the act relating to discrimination and to serve as a point of contact for students and families;Make a reasonable modification to a policy, practice, or procedure when the modification is necessary to avoid discriminating against a qualified student with a disability on the basis of disability;Provide a reasonable accommodation to a parent with a disability who is seeking appropriate access to programs and activities for parents in relation to that parent's child;Ensure that a communication to a qualified student with a disability is as effective as a communication to a student without a disability and to furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford a qualified student with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity of the LEP;Ensure that a qualified student with a disability is not denied access to the LEP's services, programs, or activities because of facilities inaccessible to a qualified student with a disability;Provide a free and appropriate public education to each qualified student with a disability who is in the LEP's jurisdiction, regardless of the nature or severity of the student's disability, and if necessary, ensure adequate transportation to and from any placement premises;Provide for the free and appropriate public education of each qualified student with a disability with students without disabilities to the maximum extent appropriate to the needs of the qualified student with a disability; Place a qualified student with a disability in the regular educational environment operated by the LEP unless it is demonstrated that the education of the student in that environment with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily;Provide nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities in such a manner as is necessary to afford a qualified student with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in the services and activities;At least annually, identify and locate every qualified student with a disability residing in the LEP's jurisdiction who is not receiving a free and appropriate public education and take appropriate steps, with the permission of the qualified student with a disability and their parent, to evaluate the student; Ensure that a qualified student with a disability is free from harassment that is sufficiently serious to create a hostile environment or interfere with or limit the student's ability to participate in or benefit from the LEP's services, activities, or opportunities; andConduct evaluations and reevaluations of a student in the student's primary language, communicate with a parent with limited English proficiency in a manner that provides meaningful access to information, and provide interpretation and translation services for communication with a parent with limited English proficiency.     Subject to sufficient funding or resources, certain provisions of the act take effect, which:Allow the department of education (department) to provide training and technical assistance to LEPs about the requirements of the act;Establish a complaint process and specifies that the department may investigate and resolve complaints of alleged violations of the provisions of the act pursuant to the complaint process;Specify the circumstances under which an individual may file a complaint with the department;Allow the department to order specified remedies as determined necessary by the department to remedy violations occurring pursuant to the act and to prospectively ensure compliance, if the department finds a violation; and Allow the state board of education (board) to withhold state funds from an LEP if the board determines that the LEP has intentionally violated the provisions of the act and demonstrated an unwillingness to enter into a corrective action plan to address the violation. No later than December 31, 2026, the board shall adopt rules that establish procedures for the withholding of funds. The board must provide due process to an LEP before state funds are withheld.     The act prohibits an LEP from coercing, intimidating, threatening, or discriminating against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by the act, the federal 'Individuals with Disabilities Education Act', the 'Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990', the 'Exceptional Children's Educational Act', or the 'Protection of Students from Restraint and Seclusion Act' (anti-discrimination laws) because an individual:Makes, has made, or because an LEP believes an individual has made or will make, a complaint pursuant to an anti-discrimination law; orTestifies, assists, or participates in any manner in an investigation or proceeding regarding an allegation or complaint pursuant to an anti-discrimination law.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

877 added · 1073 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Senate Bill 125 focus on enhancing disability rights protections in Colorado's public schools. Key additions emphasize the importance of ensuring that all students, including those with disabilities, have equal access to educational programs, services, and activities. This change matters because it strengthens the commitment to inclusive education, making it clear that the law aims to protect the rights of students with disabilities and ensure they receive the same quality of education as their peers.

→
Previous
Latest
Second Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
SENATE BILL 26-125 BY SENATOR(S) Kolker and Marchman, Amabile, Ball, Benavidez, Cutter, Danielson, Exum, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Lindstedt, Mullica, Roberts, Rodriguez, Snyder, Sullivan, Weissman, Coleman;
26-0005.01 Jed Franklin x5484 SENATE BILL 26-125 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Kolker and Marchman, Amabile, Ball, Benavidez, Coleman, Cutter, Danielson, Exum, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Lindstedt, Mullica, Roberts, Rodriguez, Snyder, Sullivan, Weissman HOUSE SPONSORSHIP BaconandPhillips, Boesenecker,Camacho,Clifford,Duran,English,Goldstein,Jackson, Lieder, Lindsay, Lukens, Marshall, Nguyen, Rutinel, Valdez, Zokaie d d e 6 a 0 S n , U g 1 H d y e a Senate Committees House Committees R M Education Judiciary 3 Appropriations Appropriations n 6 A BILL FOR AN ACT d 2 S e 2 C ONCERNING DISABILITY RIGHTS PROTECTIONS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS .
also REPRESENTATIVE(S) Bacon and Phillips, Boesenecker, Camacho, Clifford, Duran, English, Goldstein, Jackson, Lieder, Lindsay, Lukens, Marshall, Nguyen, Rutinel, Valdez, Zokaie.
U R 2 H n y d a Bill Summary d M n m (Note:
C ONCERNING DISABILITY RIGHTS PROTECTIONS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS .
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does A notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that e applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at n http://leg.colorado.gov.) m 6 T n 0 A U , The bill prohibits a school district, a charter school authorized by E i y S a a a school district, a charter school authorized by the state charter school R M r institute, the state charter school institute, or a board of cooperative 3 services that operates one or more public schools (local education provider or LEP) from discriminating against an individual who has a disabilityandwhoisentitledtoafreepubliceducation(qualifiedstudent n d with a disability) based on the student's disability.
e 6 The bill requires an LEP to allow a qualified student with a T R 0 A n , E d y Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
S e a Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n M Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
m A disability to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the provider's programs, services, or activities in the same manner as a student without adisability.Whenprovidinganyaid,benefit,orservice,anLEPshallnot, based on disability:
! Denyaqualifiedstudentwithadisabilityanopportunityto participate in or benefit from the aid, benefit, or service in a manner that is equal to that afforded to other students;
! Provide a qualified student with a disability with an aid, benefit, or service that is not as effective as that provided to other students;
! Provide different or separate aids, benefits, orservicestoa qualified student with a disability unless such action is necessary to provide a qualified student with a disability withaids,benefits,orservicesthatareaseffectiveasthose provided to other students;
! Aidorperpetuatediscriminationagainstaqualifiedstudent with a disability by providing significant assistance to an agency, organization, or person that discriminates on the basis of disability in providing any aid, benefit, or service to beneficiaries of the LEP's educational program or activity;
or ! Otherwise limit a qualified student with a disability in the enjoymentofanyright,privilege,advantage,oropportunity enjoyed by students without disabilities who receive an educational aid, benefit, or service.
The bill prohibits an LEP from using criteria or methods of administration that:
! Have the effect of subjecting a qualified student with a disability to discrimination on the basis of their disability;
! Have the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the LEP's programor activitywithrespecttoa qualified student with a disability;
or ! Perpetuate the discrimination of another LEP if both LEPs are subject to common administrative control or are agencies of the state.
In determining the site or location of a facility, an LEP may not make selections that:
! Excludeaqualifiedstudentwithadisabilityfroma facility or denya qualified student with a disability the benefits of a facility, or thatotherwisesubject a qualified student with a disability to discrimination;
or ! Have the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially impairing the accomplishment of the objectives of the programor activitywith respect to aqualifiedstudentwith -2- 125 a disability.
The bill requires an LEP to:
! Adopt a disability rights grievance process, which is satisfied by following the grievance procedures in section of the federal "Rehabilitation Act of 1973" and to designate at least one responsible employee to oversee compliance with the provisions of the bill relating to discrimination and to serve as a point of contact for students and families;
! Make a reasonable modification to a policy, practice, or procedure when the modification is necessary to avoid discriminating against a qualified student with a disability on the basis of disability;
! Ensure that a communication to a qualified student with a disability is as effective as a communication to a student withoutadisabilityandtofurnishappropriateauxiliaryaids and services where necessary to afford a qualified student with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity of the LEP;
! Ensure that a qualified student with a disability is not deniedaccesstotheLEP'sservices,programs,oractivities becauseoffacilitiesinaccessibletoaqualifiedstudentwith a disability;
! Provide a free and appropriate public education to each qualified student with a disability who is in the LEP's jurisdiction, regardless of the nature or severity of the student's disability and if necessary, ensure adequate transportation to and from any placement premises;
! Provide for the free and appropriate public education of each qualified student with a disability with students without disabilities to the maximum extent appropriate to the needs of the qualified student with a disability;
! Place a qualified student with a disability in the regular educational environment operated by the LEP unless it is demonstrated that the education of the student in that environment with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily;
! Provide nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities in such a manner as is necessary to afford a qualified student with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in the services and activities;
! At least annually, identify and locate every qualified student with a disability residing in the LEP's jurisdiction who is not receiving a free and appropriate public -3- 125 education and take appropriate steps, with the permission ofthequalifiedstudentwithadisabilityandtheirparent,to evaluate the student;
and ! Ensurethataqualifiedstudentwithadisabilityisfreefrom harassment that is sufficiently serious to create a hostile environment or interfere with or limit the student's ability to participate in or benefit from the LEP's services, activities, or opportunities.
The bill requires the department of education (department) to provide training and technicalassistancetoLEPsaboutthe requirements of the bill.
The bill establishes a complaint process and specifies that the department mayinvestigate and resolve complaints of alleged violations of the provisions of the bill pursuant to the complaint process.
Thebillspecifiesthecircumstancesunderwhichanindividualmay file a complaint with the department.
Ifthedepartmentfindsaviolationpursuanttothebill,itmayorder specifiedremediesasdeterminednecessarybythedepartment,toremedy violations occurring pursuant to the bill and to prospectively ensure compliance.
The state board of education (board) may withhold state funds from an LEP if the board determines that the LEP has intentionally violated the provisions of the bill and demonstrated an unwillingness to enter into a corrective action plan to address the violation.
No later than December 31, 2026, the board shall adopt rules that establish procedures for the withholding of funds.
ThebillprohibitsanLEPfromcoercing,intimidating,threatening, or discriminating against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by the bill, the federal "Individuals with Disabilities Education Act", the ADA, the "Exceptional Children's Educational Act", or the "Protection of Students from Restraint and Seclusion Act" (anti-discrimination laws) because an individual:
! Makes,hasmade,orbecauseanLEPbelievesanindividual has made or will make, a complaint pursuant to an anti-discrimination law;
or ! Testifies, assists, or participates in any manner in an investigation or proceeding regarding an allegation or complaint pursuant to an anti-discrimination law.
Show all 244 changed rows (204 more)
Previous
Latest
SECTION 1.
SECTION1.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, add article 29.5 to title 22 as follows:
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,addarticle29.5totitle as follows:
-4- 125 ARTICLE 29.5 Disability Rights Protections in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools 22-29.5-101.
ARTICLE 29.5 Disability Rights Protections in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools 22-29.5-101.
(1) THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FINDS AND DECLARES THAT:
(1) THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FINDS AND DECLARES THAT :
(a) S ECTION 2OF ARTICLE IX OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION REQUIRESTHESTATETOMAINTAINATHOROUGHANDUNIFORMSYSTEMOF FREE PUBLIC SCHOOLS THAT SERVES ALL CHILDREN IN C OLORADO , INCLUDING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITI;S (b) ENSURING EQUAL ACCESS TO EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS , SERVICES, AND ACTIVITIES IS ESSENTIAL TO FULFILLING THIS CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE ,ADVANCING THE STATE S LONGSTANDING COMMITMENT TO EDUCATIONAL EQUITY AND NONDISCRIMINATION , PROMOTING ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AMONG STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIE,AND CLOSING OPPORTUNITY GAPS;
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
(c) COLORADO HAS A STRONG CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITION OF PROTECTINGINDIVIDUALRIGHTSASSETFORTHINARTICLE 2OFTHESTATE CONSTITUTION, INCLUDING THE GUARANTEES OF EQUALITY OF RIGHTS, DUE PROCESS OF LAW,AND SECURITY OF PERSON;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
(d) STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES HAVE HISTORICALLY RELIED ON FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS LAW,INCLUDING SECTION 504OF THE FEDERAL "REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973" AND TITLE II OF THE FEDERAL "A MERICANS WITH DISABILITIEA CT OF1990", TO SAFEGUARD THEIR ACCESS TO EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM DISCRIMINATION;
(a) ECTION 2OFARTICLE IXOFTHESTATECONSTITUTIONREQUIRES THE STATE TO MAINTAIN A THOROUGH AND UNIFORM SYSTEM OF FREE PUBLIC SCHOOLS THAT SERVES ALL CHILDREN IN COLORADO , INCLUDING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (b) ENSURING EQUAL ACCESS TO EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS , SERVICES, AND ACTIVITIES IS ESSENTIAL TO FULFILLING THIS CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE , ADVANCING THE STATE 'S LONGSTANDING COMMITMENT TO EDUCATIONAL EQUITY AND NONDISCRIMINATION , PROMOTINGACADEMICACHIEVEMENTAMONGSTUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES , AND CLOSING OPPORTUNITY GAPS;
(e) ICORPORATINGCORE PROTECTIONSOFTHESE FEDERALLAWS INTO STATE STATUTE STRENGTHENS C OLORADO S ENFORCEMENT -5- 125 FRAMEWORK ,ENSURESCONTINUITYOFRIGHTSREGARDLESSOFCHANGES TO FEDERAL ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES, AND PROMOTES CLARITY AND CONSISTENCY FOR STUDENTS , FAMILIE, AND LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDERS;
(c) C OLORADO HAS A STRONG CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITION OF PROTECTING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AS SET FORTH IN ARTICLEF THE STATE CONSTITUTION,INCLUDING THE GUARANTEES OFEQUALITY OFRIGHTS DUE PROCESS OF LAW,AND SECURITY OF PERSONS;
(f) IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE STATE TO CODIFY FEDERAL DISABILIT-BASED NONDISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO PUBLICELEMENTARYANDSECONDARYEDUCATION ,TOAFFIRMTHERIGHT OFEACHQUALIFIEDSTUDENT WITHADISABILITYTOAFREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION,AND TO ESTABLISH CLEAR OBLIGATIONS FOR LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDERS CONCERNING IDENTIFICATION , EVALUATION , EDUCATIONALPLACEMENT ,REASONABLEACCOMMODATIONS EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION ,PHYSICALACCESSIBILIT,AND PROTECTIONS AGAINST HARASSMENT AND RETALIATION ;AND (g) P ROVIDING STATE-LEVEL REMEDIES , OVERSIGHT , AND ENFORCEMENTMECHANISMS INCLUDINGAUNIFORMCOMPLAINTPROCESS ADMINISTEREDBYTHESTATEDEPARTMENTOFEDUCATION ,COMPLEMENTS FEDERAL SAFEGUARDS ,PROMOTES TIMELY AND LOCAL RESOLUTION OF CONCERNS , AND ENSURES THAT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES HAVE RELIABLE AND ACCESSIBLE AVENUES FOR ADDRESSING VIOLATIONS OF THEIR RIGHTS.
(d) STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES HAVE HISTORICALLY RELIED ON FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS,INCLUDING SECTION 504 OF THE FEDERAL "REHABILITATION ACTOF 1973"ANDTITLE IIOFTHEFEDERAL "AMERICANS WITH D ISABILITIESACT OF 1990",TO SAFEGUARD THEIR ACCESS TO EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM DISCRIMINATION;
(2) TEGENERALASSEMBLYFURTHERFINDSANDDECLARESTHAT THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICL29.5IS T:
(e) ICORPORATING CORE PROTECTIONS OF THESE FEDERAL LAWS INTO STATE STATUTE STRENGTHENS COLORADO S ENFORCEMENT FRAMEWORK ,ENSURESCONTINUITYOFRIGHTSREGARDLESSOFCHANGESTO FEDERAL ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES , AND PROMOTES CLARITY AND CONSISTENCYFORSTUDENTS ,FAMILIESANDLOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERS ;
(a) UPHOLD THE STATE S CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE A THOROUGH AND UNIFORM SYSTEM OF FREE PUBLIC SCHOOL;
(f) IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE STATE TO CODIFY FEDERAL DISABILITYBASED NONDISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO PUBLIC ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ,TO AFFIRM THE RIGHT OF EACH QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY TO A FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION ,AND TO ESTABLISH CLEAR OBLIGATIONS FOR LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDERS CONCERNING IDENTIFICATION , EVALUATION , EDUCATIONAL PLACEMENT ,REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS ,EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION ,PHYSICAL ACCESSIBILITY,AND PROTECTIONS AGAINST HARASSMENT AND RETALIATION ;AND PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-125 (g) P ROVIDING STATE-LEVEL REMEDIES , OVERSIGHT , AND ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS ,INCLUDING A UNIFORM COMPLAINT PROCESS ADMINISTEREDBY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OFEDUCATION ,COMPLEMENTS FEDERAL SAFEGUARDS ,PROMOTES TIMELY AND LOCAL RESOLUTION OF CONCERNS , AND ENSURES THAT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES HAVE RELIABLEANDACCESSIBLEAVENUESFORADDRESSINGVIOLATIONSOFTHEIR RIGHTS.
(b) AFFIRM THE STATES COMMITMENT TO EQUAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY AND NONDISCRIMINATION FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIE;
(2) THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FURTHER FINDS AND DECLARES THAT THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE29.5IS T:
-6- 125 (c) NSURETHATPUBLICSCHOOLSPROVIDEQUALIFIEDSTUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WITH THE AIDS, BENEFITS, SERVICES, AND OPPORTUNITIES NECESSARY TO PARTICIPATE FULLY AND MEANINGFULLY IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS ;
(a) UPHOLDTHESTATE 'SCONSTITUTIONALOBLIGATIONTOPROVIDE A THOROUGH AND UNIFORM SYSTEM OF FREE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ;
(d) C REATE CLEAR,CONSISTENT STATEWIDE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES THAT ALIGN WITH FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS WHILE PROVIDING INDEPENDENT STATE PROTECTIONS;AND (e) ENSURE THAT ALL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN THE STATE ARE EDUCATED IN ENVIRONMENTS THAT RESPECT THEIR DIGNITY , INDEPENDENCE ,AND RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE FULLY IN THE LIFE OF THEIR SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES .
(b) A FFIRM THE STATE'S COMMITMENT TO EQUAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITYANDNONDISCRIMINATIONFORSTUDENTSWITHDISABILITIES ;
(c) ENSURE THAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS PROVIDE QUALIFIED STUDENTS WITHDISABILITIESWITHTHEAIDS ,BENEFITS,SERVICES,ANDOPPORTUNITIES NECESSARY TO PARTICIPATE FULLY AND MEANINGFULLY IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS ;
(d) CREATE CLEAR ,CONSISTENT STATEWIDE STANDARDS AND PROCEDURESTHATALIGNWITHFEDERALREQUIREMENTSWHILEPROVIDING INDEPENDENT STATE PROTECTIONS ;AND (e) ENSURE THAT ALL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN THE STATE ARE EDUCATED IN ENVIRONMENTS THAT RESPECT THEIR DIGNITY , INDEPENDENCE ,AND RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE FULLY IN THE LIFE OF THEIR SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES .
A S USED IN THIS ARTI29.5,UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:
A S USED IN THIS ARTICL29.5,UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:
(1) "AMERICANS WITHD ISABILITIEACT"OR "ADA" MEANS THE FEDERAL "AMERICANS WITH D ISABILITIASCT OF1990",42U.S.C.
(1) "AMERICANS WITH D ISABILITIEACT "OR "ADA" MEANS THE FEDERAL "A MERICANS WITH DISABILITIESACT OF 1990", 42 U.S.CSEC .
SEC.
ET SEQ.
12101 ET SE.
PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-125 (2) "A PPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION " MEANS THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC EDUCATION AND RELATED AIDS AND SERVICES THAT ARE DESIGNED TO MEET THE INDIVIDUAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS OF A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY AS ADEQUATELY AS THE NEEDS OF A STUDENT WITHOUT ADISABILITYANDAREBASEDONADHERENCETOPROCEDURESTHATSATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
(2) "APPROPRIATE PUBLICEDUCATION"MEANSTHEPROVISIONOF PUBLICEDUCATIONANDRELATEDAIDSANDSERVICESTHATAREDESIGNED TOMEETTHEINDIVIDUALEDUCATIONALNEEDSOFA QUALIFIEDSTUDENT WITH A DISABILITY AS ADEQUATELY AS THE NEEDS OF A STUDENT WITHOUT A DISABILITY AND ARE BASED ON ADHERENCE TO PROCEDURES THAT SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTIC29.5.
(3) "D AYS"MEANS CALENDAR DAYS .
(3) "DAYS"MEANS CALENDAR DAYS .
(4) "D EPARTMENT " MEANS THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CREATED AND EXISTING PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-1-115.
(4) "D EPARTMENT " MEANS THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CREATED AND EXISTING PURSUANT TO SECTION24-1-115.
(5) "DISABILITY"MEANSAPHYSICALORMENTALIMPAIRMENTTHAT SUBSTANTIALLYLIMITSONE ORMORE MAJORLIFEACTIVITIES ,ARECORDOF SUCH AN IMPAIRMENT , OR BEING REGARDED AS HAVING SUCH AN IMPAIRMENT .
(5) "DISABILIT" MEANS A PHYSICAL OR MENTAL IMPAIRMENT -7- 125 THAT SUBSTANTIALLY LIMITS ONE OR MORE MAJOR LIFE ACTIVITIE, A RECORD OF SUCH AN IMPAIRMENT,OR BEING REGARDED AS HAVING SUCH AN IMPAIRMENT .
(6) "FACILITIES" MEANS ALL OR ANY PORTION OF BUILDINGS , STRUCTURES ,EQUIPMENT ,ROADS ,WALKS ,PARKING LOTS ,OR OTHER REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY OR INTERESTS IN SUCH PROPERTY .
(6) "FACILITIE" MEANS ALL OR ANY PORTION OF BUILDINGS , STRUCTURES ,EQUIPMENT ROADS ,WALKS PARKINGLOTS ,OROTHERREAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY OR INTERESTS IN SUCH PROPERT.
(7) "FREEEDUCATION "MEANSTHEPROVISIONOFEDUCATIONALAND RELATED SERVICES WITHOUT COST TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY OR TO THE STUDENT'S PARENT OR GUARDIAN ,EXCEPT FOR THE FEES THAT ARE IMPOSED ON STUDENTS WITHOUT A DISABILITY OR THEIR PARENT OR GUARDIAN .
(7) "FREE EDUCATION" MEANS THE PROVISION OF EDUCATIONAL AND RELATED SERVICES WITHOUT COST TOAQUALIFIEDSTUDENT WITH A DISABILITYOR TOTHESTUDENT 'SPARENTORGUARDIAN EXCEPTFORTHE FEES THAT ARE IMPOSED ON STUDENTS WITHOUT A DISABILITY OR THEIR PARENT OR GUARDIAN .
A FREE EDUCATION MAY CONSIST OF EITHER THE PROVISIONOFFREE SERVICES THROUGH A PROGRAM OPERATED BY A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER OR THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER PLACING A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY OR REFERRING THE STUDENT FOR AID , BENEFITS, OR SERVICES NOT OPERATED OR PROVIDED BY THE LOCAL EDUCATIONPROVIDERASITSMEANSOFCARRYINGOUTTHEREQUIREMENTS OFTHISARTICLE 29.5FORPAYMENTOFTHECOSTSOFTHEAID ,BENEFITS ,OR SERVICES.F UNDS AVAILABLE FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE AGENCY MAY BE USED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
AFREE EDUCATION MAY CONSIST OF EITHER THE PROVISION OF FREE SERVICES THROUGH A PROGRAM OPERATED BY A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER OR THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER PLACING A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITYOR REFERRING THE STUDENT FOR AID,BENEFITS,OR SERVICES NOT OPERATED OR PROVIDED BY THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER AS ITS MEANS OF CARRYING OUT THE REQUIREMENTSOFTHISARTICLE 29.5FORPAYMENTOFTHECOSTSOFTHE AID,BENEFITS,OR SERVICES.
NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO RELIEVE AN INSURER OR SIMILAR THIRD PARTY FROM AN OTHERWISE VALID OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE OR PAY FOR SERVICES TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY.
FUNDS AVAILABLE FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE AGENCY MAY BE USED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
(8) "INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM " OR "IEP" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 22-20-103 (15).
NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO RELIEVEANINSURERORSIMILARTHIRDPARTYFROMANOTHERWISEVALID OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE OR PAY FOR SERVICES TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILIT.
PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-125 (9) "NDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIESEDUCATION A CT"OR "IDEA" MEANS THE FEDERAL "INDIVIDUALS WITH D ISABILITIESEDUCATION ACT ", U.S.C.SEC.
(8) "IDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM "OR "IEP" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION22-20-103 (15).
1400ET SEQ .
(9) "INDIVIDUALS WITH D ISABILITIESEDUCATION ACT" OR "IDEA" MEANS THE FEDERAL "INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES -8- 125 E DUCATION ACT ", 20 U.S.SEC.
(10) "LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER " MEANS A SCHOOL DISTRICT ,A CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORIZED BY A SCHOOL DISTRICT PURSUANT TO PART OF ARTICLE 30.5OF THIS TITLE22,A CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORIZED BY THE STATE CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE PURSUANT TO PART 5 OF ARTICLE 30.5OFTHISTITLE 22,THESTATECHARTERSCHOOLINSTITUTEESTABLISHED IN SECTION 22-30.5-503, A STATE-OPERATED PROGRAM , AS DEFINED IN SECTION 22-20-103,OR A BOARD OFCOOPERATIVE SERVICES CREATED AND OPERATING PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 5 OF THIS TITL22 THAT OPERATES ONE OR MORE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ;EXCEPT THAT ,FOR MATTERS INVOLVING THE PROVISION OF A FREE EDUCATION TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY, LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER "HAS THE SAME MEANING AS "ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT " AS DEFINED IN SECTION 22-20-103 (1)FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE29.5.
1400ET SEQ.
(11) "PARENT " HAS THE MEANING IN SECTION 22-20-103 (19.7).
(10) "LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER "MEANS A SCHOOL DISTRICT, A CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORIZED BY A SCHOOL DISTRICT PURSUANT TO PART 1 OF ARTICLE 30.5 OF THIS TITLE 22, A CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORIZED BY THE STATE CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE PURSUANT TO PART 5 OF ARTICLE30.5OF THIS TITL22, THE STATE CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE ESTABLISHED IN SECTION 22-30.5-503,A STATE-OPERATED PROGRAM , AS DEFINED IN SECTION 22-20-103, OR A BOARD OF COOPERATIVESERVICESCREATEDANDOPERATINGPURSUANTTOARTICLE 5 OF THIS TITLE22 THAT OPERATES ONE OR MORE PUBLIC SCHOOLS , EXCEPT THAT , FOR MATTERS INVOLVING THE PROVISION OF A FREE EDUCATION TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY , "LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER " HAS THE SAME MEANING AS "ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT" AS DEFINED IN SECTIO22-20-103 (1)FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
(12) "Q UALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY"MEANS A STUDENT WHOHASADISABILITYANDWHOISENTITLEDTOAFREEPUBLICEDUCATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-33-103.
(11) "PARENT "HAS THE MEANING IN SECTION22-20-103 (19.7).
(13) "SECTION 504" MEANS SECTION 504 OF THE FEDERAL "REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973", 29 U.S.CSEC .
(12) "QUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITY "MEANSASTUDENT WHO HAS A DISABILITY AND WHO IS ENTITLED TO A FREE PUBLIC EDUCATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-33-103.
79ET SEQ.
(13) "SECTION 504" MEANS SECTION 504 OF THE FEDERAL "R EHABILITATIONA CT OF1973", 29 U.S.CSEC.
(14) "S ECTION 504 PLAN" MEANS A PLAN MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 504 THAT PROVIDES ACCOMMODATIONS ,SERVICES, AND OTHER SUPPORT FOR A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY.
794ET SE.
22-29.5-103.
(14) "SECTION 504 PLAN "MEANS A PLAN MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 504 THAT PROVIDES ACCOMMODATIONS ,SERVICES,AND OTHER SUPPORT FOR A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILI.Y 22-29.5-103.
(1) N O QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY SHAL,ON THE BASIS OF DISABILI,BE EXCLUDED FROM PARTICIPATION INDENIED THE -9- 125 BENEFITS OF,OR OTHERWISE SUBJECTED TO DISCRIMINATION UNDER ANY PROGRAM ,SERVICE ,OR ACTIVITY BY A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER .
(1) NOQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITYSHALL ,ONTHEBASIS OFDISABILITY,BEEXCLUDEDFROMPARTICIPATIONIN ,DENIEDTHEBENEFITS OF,OR OTHERWISE SUBJECTED TO DISCRIMINATION UNDER ANY PROGRAM , SERVICE,OR ACTIVITY BY A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER .
(2) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER , IN PROVIDING ANY AID , BENEFIT,OR SERVICE,MAY NOT ,DIRECTLY OR THROUGH CONTRACTUAL , LICENSING,OR OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ,BASED ON DISABILITY:
(2) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDER ,INPROVIDINGANYAID ,BENEFIT , OR SERVICE,MAY NOT ,DIRECTLY OR THROUGH CONTRACTUAL ,LICENSING , PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 26-125 OR OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ,BASED ON DISABILITY :
(a) D ENY A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN OR BENEFIT FROM THE AI,BENEFIT,OR SERVICE;
(a) D ENY A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN OR BENEFIT FROM THE AID ,BENEFIT,OR SERVICE ;
(b) A FFORD A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY AN OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN OR BENEFIT FROM THE AI,BENEFIT,OR SERVICE THAT IS NOT EQUAL TO THAT AFFORDED TO OTHERS ;
(b) A FFORD A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY AN OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN OR BENEFIT FROM THE AID , BENEFIT,OR SERVICE THAT IS NOT EQUAL TO THAT AFFORDED TO OTHERS ;
(c) PROVIDE A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY WITH AN AID,BENEFIT,OR SERVICE THAT IS NOT AS EFFECTIVE AS THAT PROVIDED TO OTHERS;
(c) PROVIDEAQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITYWITHANAID , BENEFIT, OR SERVICE THAT IS NOT AS EFFECTIVE AS THAT PROVIDED TO OTHERS ;
(d) PROVIDE DIFFERENT OR SEPARATE AIDS , BENEFITS ,OR SERVICES TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY OR TO ANY CLASS OF QUALIFIED STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY UNLESS SUCH ACTION IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY WITH AIDS,BENEFITS,ORSERVICESTHATAREASEFFECTIVEASTHOSEPROVIDED TO OTHERS;
(d) PROVIDE DIFFERENT OR SEPARATE AIDS ,BENEFITS,OR SERVICES TOAQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITYORTOANYCLASSOFQUALIFIED STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY UNLESS SUCH ACTION IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDEAQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITYWITHAIDS ,BENEFITS,OR SERVICES THAT ARE AS EFFECTIVE AS THOSE PROVIDED TO OTHERS ;
(e) AID OR PERPETUATE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY BY PROVIDING SIGNIFICANT ASSISTANCE TO AN AGENCY , ORGANIZATION ,OR PERSON THAT DISCRIMINATES ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN PROVIDING ANY AID,BENEFIT ,OR SERVICE TO BENEFICIARIES OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY ;OR (f) OTHERWISELIMITAQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITYIN -10- 125 THEENJOYMENTOFANYRIGHT ,PRIVILEGEADVANTAGE ,OROPPORTUNITY ENJOYED BY OTHERS RECEIVING AN EDUCATIONAL AID , BENEFIT,OR SERVICE .
(e) A ID OR PERPETUATE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST A QUALIFIED STUDENTWITHADISABILITYBYPROVIDINGSIGNIFICANTASSISTANCETOAN AGENCY ORGANIZATION ,ORPERSONTHATDISCRIMINATESONTHEBASISOF DISABILITY IN PROVIDING ANY AIDBENEFIT ,OR SERVICE TO BENEFICIARIES OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY;
(3) F OR PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5,AN AID,BENEFIT,OR SERVICE ,TO BE EQUALLY EFFECTIVE,IS NOT REQUIRED TO PRODUCE THE IDENTICALRESULTORLEVELOFACHIEVEMENTFORQUALIFIEDSTUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY AND STUDENTS WITHOUT A DISABILITY ,BUT MUST AFFORD A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO OBTAIN THE SAME RESULT ,TO GAIN THE SAME BENEFI,OR TO REACH THE SAME LEVEL OF ACHIEVEMENT IN THE MOST INTEGRATED SETTING APPROPRIATE TO THE STUDENT S NEEDS.
OR (f) O THERWISE LIMIT A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IN THE ENJOYMENT OF ANY RIGHT ,PRIVILEGE,ADVANTAGE ,OR OPPORTUNITY ENJOYEDBYOTHERSRECEIVINGANEDUCATIONALAID ,BENEFIT,ORSERVICE .
(4) D ESPITE THE EXISTENCE OF SEPARATE OR DIFFERENT AIDS, BENEFITS ORSERVICES PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHISTITLE 22,A LOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERMAYNOTDENYAQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITH ADISABILITYTHEOPPORTUNITYTOPARTICIPATE INSUCHAIDS ,BENEFITS, OR SERVICES THAT ARE NOT SEPARATE OR DIFFERENT.
(3) F OR PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5,AN AID ,BENEFIT ,OR SERVICE ,TO BE EQUALLY EFFECTIVE , IS NOT REQUIRED TO PRODUCE THE IDENTICAL RESULT OR LEVEL OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR QUALIFIED STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY AND STUDENTS WITHOUT A DISABILITY ,BUT MUST AFFORD A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY EQUALOPPORTUNITY TO OBTAIN THE SAME RESULT ,TO GAIN THE SAME BENEFIT ,OR TO REACH THE SAME LEVEL OF ACHIEVEMENT IN THE MOST INTEGRATED SETTING APPROPRIATE TO THE STUDENT S NEEDS.
(5) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL NOT ,DIRECTLY OR THROUGH CONTRACTUAL OR OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ,USE CRITERIA OR METHODS OF ADMINISTRATION THAT :
PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 26-125 (4) D ESPITE THE EXISTENCE OF SEPARATE OR DIFFERENT AIDS , BENEFITS,OR SERVICES PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS TITLE 22, A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MAY NOT DENY A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH ADISABILITYTHEOPPORTUNITYTOPARTICIPATEINSUCHAIDS BENEFITS ,OR SERVICES THAT ARE NOT SEPARATE OR DIFFERENT .
(a) HAVE THE EFFECT OFSUBJECTINGAQUALIFIEDSTUDENT WITH A DISABILITY TO DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF THEIR DISABIL;TY (b) H AVE THE PURPOSE OR EFFECT OF DEFEATING OR SUBSTANTIALLYIMPAIRINGTHEACCOMPLISHMENTOFTHEOBJECTIVESOF THELOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDER SPROGRAMORACTIVITYWITHRESPECT TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILIT;OR (c) PERPETUATE THE DISCRIMINATION OF ANOTHER LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER IF BOTH LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDERS ARE -11- 125 SUBJECTTOCOMMONADMINISTRATIVECONTROLORAREAGENCIESOFTHE STATE.
(5) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL NOT , DIRECTLY OR THROUGH CONTRACTUAL OR OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ,USE CRITERIA OR METHODS OF ADMINISTRATION THAT :
(6) IN DETERMINING THE SITE OR LOCATION OF A FACILIT,A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL NOT MAKE SELECTIONS THAT:
(a) HAVE THE EFFECT OFSUBJECTING A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY TO DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF THEIR DISABILITY (b) HAVETHEPURPOSEOREFFECTOFDEFEATINGORSUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIRING THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY WITH RESPECT TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY;OR (c) PERPETUATE THE DISCRIMINATION OF ANOTHER LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER IFBOTH LOCALEDUCATION PROVIDERS ARE SUBJECT TO COMMON ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OR ARE AGENCIES OF THE STATE .
(a) HAVE THE EFFECT OFEXCLUDING A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY FROM A FACILITY OR DENYING A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY THE BENEFITS OF A FACI,OR OTHERWISE SUBJECTING A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY TO DISCRIMINAT;OR (b) HAVE THE PURPOSE OR EFFECT OF DEFEATING OR SUBSTANTIALLYIMPAIRINGTHEACCOMPLISHMENTOFTHEOBJECTIVESOF THEPROGRAMORACTIVITYWITHRESPECTTOAQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITH A DISABILIT.
(6) INDETERMININGTHE SITE OR LOCATION OFA FACILITY ,A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL NOT MAKE SELECTIONS THAT :
(7) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLCONDUCTEVALUATIONS AND REEVALUATIONS OF A STUDENT IN THE STUDENT S PRIMARY LANGUAGE .
(a) HAVE THE EFFECT OF EXCLUDING A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY FROM A FACILITY OR DENYING A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY THE BENEFITS OF A FACILITY, OR OTHERWISE SUBJECTING A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY TO DISCRIMINATION;
ALOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL COMMUNICATE WITH A PARENT WITH LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY IN A MANNER THAT PROVIDESTHEPARENTWITHMEANINGFULACCESSTOINFORMATIONTHAT IS PROVIDED TO OTHER PARENTS ,INCLUDING INFORMATION ABOUT PROGRAMS ,SERVICES,AND ACTIVITIE.
OR (b) HAVETHEPURPOSEOREFFECTOFDEFEATINGORSUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIRING THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OFTHE OBJECTIVES OFTHE PROGRAM OR ACTIVITY WITH RESPECT TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY.
(7) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL CONDUCT EVALUATIONS ANDREEVALUATIONSOFASTUDENTINTHESTUDENT SPRIMARYLANGUAGE .
A LOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLCOMMUNICATEWITHAPARENTWITH LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY IN A MANNER THAT PROVIDES THE PARENT WITH MEANINGFUL ACCESS TO INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED TO OTHER PARENTS ,INCLUDING INFORMATION ABOUT PROGRAMS ,SERVICES ,AND PAGE 7-SENATE BILL 26-125 ACTIVITIES.
(1) ALOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL :
(1) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL :
(a) ADOPT A GRIEVANCE PROCESS THAT INCORPORATES APPROPRIATE DUE PROCESS STANDARDS AND PROVIDES FOR THE PROMPT AND EQUITABLE RESOLUTION OF COMPLAINTS ALLEGING ANY ACTION PROHIBITED BY SECTION504,WHICH MAY BE SATISFIED BY ADOPTING A SECTION 504GRIEVANCE PROCESS THAT FULFILLSTHE REQUIREMENTSOF 34 CFR 104.7.
(a) ADOPTAGRIEVANCEPROCESSTHATINCORPORATESAPPROPRIATE DUE PROCESS STANDARDS AND PROVIDES FOR THE PROMPT AND EQUITABLE RESOLUTIONOFCOMPLAINTSALLEGINGANYACTIONPROHIBITEDBYSECTION 504, WHICH MAY BE SATISFIED BY ADOPTING A SECTION 504 GRIEVANCE PROCESS THAT FULFILLS THE REQUIREMENTS OF 34CFR104.7.T HE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER IS NOT REQUIRED TO APPLY ITS GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE TO ALLEGATIONS RELATED TO THE IDENTIFICATION , EVALUATION PLACEMENT ,ORPROVISIONOFFREEEDUCATIONPURSUANTTO AN IEP.
THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER IS NOT REQUIRED TO -12- 125 APPLY ITS GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE TO ALLEGATIONS RELATED TO THE IDENTIFICATIO, EVALUATION , PLACEMENT ,OR PROVISION OF FREE EDUCATION PURSUANT TO AN IEP.
(b) DESIGNATE AT LEAST ONE RESPONSIBLE EMPLOYEE TO OVERSEE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE 29.5AND SERVE AS A POINT OF CONTACT FORSTUDENTS ,PARENTS THEDEPARTMENT ,ANDTHIRDPARTIESSUBJECTTO THE FOLLOWING :
(b) DESIGNATE AT LEAST ONE RESPONSIBLE EMPLOYEE TO OVERSEE COMPLIANCE WITHTHISARTICLE 29.5ANDSERVE ASAPOINT OF CONTACTFORSTUDENTS ,PARENTS,THEDEPARTMENT ANDTHIRDPARTIES SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING:
(I) THE RESPONSIBLE EMPLOYEE MUST RECEIVE TRAINING ABOUT HOWTOCOMPLYWITHTHEREQUIREMENTSOFTHISARTICLE 29.5INCLUDING CREATINGINCLUSIVEANDRESPECTFULENVIRONMENTSFORSTUDENTSWITH DISABILITIESDISABILITY RIGHTS,AND THE DISABILITY RIGHTS GRIEVANCE PROCESS WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF BEING DESIGNATED ;
(I) HE RESPONSIBLE EMPLOYEE MUST RECEIVE TRAINING ABOUT HOW TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5, INCLUDING CREATING INCLUSIVE AND RESPECTFUL ENVIRONMENTS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIE,DISABILITY RIGHT,AND THE DISABILITY RIGHTS GRIEVANCE PROCESS WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF BEING DESIGNAT;D (II) IDDITIONTOOVERSEEINGCOMPLIANCEWITHTHISARTICLE 29.5ANDSERVINGASAPOINTOFCONTACTFORSTUDENTS ,PARENTS ,AND THIRD PARTIES WHO HAVE QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS ABOUT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICL29.5,THE RESPONSIBLE EMPLOYEE MAY ALSO SERVE AS THE RESPONSIBLE EMPLOYEE REQUIRED B34CFR104.7 (a);AND (III) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL PROVIDE THE RESPONSIBLE EMPLOYEE WITH THE NECESSARY TIME ,RESOURCES, AND AUTHORITY TO FULFILL THE OBLIGATIONS SET FORTH IN THIS ARTICLE 29.5;
(II) I ADDITION TO OVERSEEING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE 29.5AND SERVING AS A POINT OF CONTACT FOR STUDENTS ,PARENTS ,AND THIRD PARTIES WHO HAVE QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS ABOUT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5,THE RESPONSIBLE EMPLOYEE MAY ALSOSERVEASTHERESPONSIBLEEMPLOYEEREQUIREDBY 34CFR104.7(a);
(c) POVIDEINITIALANDCONTINUINGNOTIFICATIONTOSTUDENTS AND PARENTS THAT THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MUST NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILI.
AND (III) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL PROVIDE THE RESPONSIBLE EMPLOYEE WITH THE NECESSARY TIME ,RESOURCES ,AND AUTHORITY TO FULFILL THE OBLIGATIONS SET FORTH IN THIS ARTICLE29.5;
THE NOTIFICATION SHALL INCLUDE THE NAME,TITLE,PHONE NUMBER ,AND EMAIL ADDRESS OF THE RESPONSIBLEEMPLOYEEDESIGNATEDPURSUANTTOSUBSECTION (1)(bOF -13- 125 THISSECTION.A LOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLPROVIDETHEINITIAL NOTIFICATIONREQUIREDBYTHISSUBSECTION (1)(cONORBEFORE A PRIL 1,2027.
(c) PROVIDE INITIAL AND CONTINUING NOTIFICATION TO STUDENTS AND PARENTS THAT THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MUST NOT PAGE 8-SENATE BILL 26-125 DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY .
METHODS OF INITIAL AND CONTINUING NOTIFICATION INCLUDE THE PUBLIC POSTING OF HARD-COPY NOTICES IN SCHOOLS AND IN THE CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING OF A SCHOOL;INCLUSION IN STUDENT AND EMPLOYEEHANDBOOKS ;INCLUSIONINNEWSLETTERS ,MASSEMAILS ,AND INFORMATION SENT HOME TO PARENTS ;PLACEMENT OF NOTICES IN THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S PUBLICATIONS AND ONLINE MATERIALS, INCLUDING THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S WEBSITE AND SOCIAL MEDIA ;
THE NOTIFICATION SHALL INCLUDE THE NAME ,TITLE,PHONE NUMBER ,AND EMAIL ADDRESS OF THE RESPONSIBLE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (1)(bOF THIS SECTION.A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL PROVIDE THE INITIAL NOTIFICATION REQUIRED BY THIS SUBSECTION (1)(c)ON OR BEFORE A PRIL 1,2027.M ETHODSOFINITIALANDCONTINUINGNOTIFICATIONINCLUDETHE PUBLIC POSTING OF HARD-COPY NOTICES IN SCHOOLS AND IN THE CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING OF A SCHOOL ;
OR DISTRIBUTION OF MEMORANDA OR OTHER WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS .
INCLUSION IN STUDENT AND EMPLOYEE HANDBOOKS ;INCLUSIONINNEWSLETTERS ,MASSEMAILS ,ANDINFORMATION SENTHOMETOPARENTS ;PLACEMENTOFNOTICESINTHELOCALEDUCATION PROVIDER SPUBLICATIONS ANDONLINE MATERIALS ,INCLUDINGTHE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S WEBSITE AND SOCIAL MEDIA;OR DISTRIBUTION OF MEMORANDA OR OTHER WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS .
THIS NOTICE REQUIREMENT MAY BE MET IN CONJUNCTION WITH ANY NOTICE REQUIRED BY34CFR104.8, OR 28CFR 35.106.
T HIS NOTICE REQUIREMENTMAYBEMETINCONJUNCTIONWITHANYNOTICEREQUIREDBY CFR 104.8,OR 28 CFR 35.106.
(d) TRAIN RELEVANT STAFF ANNUALLY ABOUT THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE29.5.
(d) T RAIN RELEVANT STAFF ANNUALLY ABOUT THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
OR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTIO, "RELEVANT STAFF"INCLUDES THE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTIO,AT LEAST ONE ADMINISTRATOR OR DESIGNEE FROM EACH EDUCATIONALBUILDINGONTHELOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDER SPREMISES , AND AT LEAST ONE OTHER STAFF REGULARLY INVOLVED WITH DEVELOPING IMPLEMENTING ,ANDCOORDINATINGPLANSINACCORDANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION , "RELEVANT STAFF " INCLUDES THE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, AT LEAST ONE ADMINISTRATOR OR DESIGNEE FROM EACH EDUCATIONAL BUILDING ON THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S PREMISES, ANDATLEASTONEOTHERSTAFFREGULARLYINVOLVEDWITHDEVELOPING , IMPLEMENTING , AND COORDINATING PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
F A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER HAS A BUILDING-SPECIFIC COORDINATOR RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 504ANDTHISARTICLE 29.5,THATINDIVIDUALMAYATTENDTHE TRAINING INSTEAD OF A BUILDING ADMINISTRATO.
F A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER HAS A BUILDING-SPECIFIC COORDINATOR RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 504ANDTHIS ARTICLE 29.5,THAT INDIVIDUAL MAY ATTEND THE TRAINING INSTEAD OF A BUILDING ADMINISTRATOR .
(1) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTIO(2)OF THIS SECTIO,A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL MAKE A REASONABLE -14- 125 ACCOMMODATION TO A POLICY ,PRACTICE,OR PROCEDURE WHEN THE ACCOMMODATION IS NECESSARY TO AVOID DISCRIMINATING AGAINST A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY ON THE BASIS OF DISABILI,Y UNLESS THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT MAKING THE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION WOULD FUNDAMENTALLY ALTERTHENATUREOFTHESERVICE ,PROGRAM ,ORACTIVITYCOVEREDBY THE POLICY,PRACTICE,OR PROCEDURE ,OR CAUSE AN UNDUE FINANCIAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN ON THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER.
(1) E XCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (2)OF THIS SECTION,A LOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLMAKEAREASONABLEACCOMMODATION TO A POLICY, PRACTICE,OR PROCEDURE WHEN THE ACCOMMODATION IS NECESSARYTOAVOIDDISCRIMINATINGAGAINSTAQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITH A DISABILITY ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITYNLESS THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT MAKING THE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION WOULD FUNDAMENTALLY ALTER THE NATURE OF THE SERVICE,PROGRAM ,OR ACTIVITY COVERED BY THE POLICY ,PRACTICE ,OR PROCEDURE OR CAUSE AN UNDUE FINANCIALOR ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN ON THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER .
(2) ALOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER IS NOT REQUIRED TO MAKE A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION TO A POLICY ,PRACTICE OR PROCEDURE TO AVOID DISCRIMINATING AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS ONLY REGARDED AS HAVING A DISABILITY PURSUANT TO THADA.
PAGE 9-SENATE BILL 26-125 (2) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER IS NOT REQUIRED TO MAKE A REASONABLEACCOMMODATIONTOAPOLICY ,PRACTICE ,ORPROCEDURETO AVOIDDISCRIMINATINGAGAINSTANINDIVIDUALWHOISONLYREGARDEDAS HAVING A DISABILITY PURSUANT TO THEADA.
(3)A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL PROVIDE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS TO A PARENT WITH A DISABILITY , INCLUDING A COMMUNICATION RELATED DISABILITY,WHO IS SEEKING APPROPRIATE ACCESS TO PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES FORPARENTSINRELATIONTOTHAT PARENT S CHILD .
(3) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL PROVIDE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS TO A PARENT WITH A DISABILITY , INCLUDING A COMMUNICATION -RELATED DISABILITY, WHO IS SEEKING APPROPRIATE ACCESS TO PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES FOR PARENTS IN RELATION TO THAT PARENT SCHILD.C OMMUNICATION -RELATEDDISABILITYACCOMMODATIONS MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS STATED IN SECTION 22-29.5-106.
C OMMUNICATION -RELATED DISABILITY ACCOMMODATIONS MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS STATED IN SECTION22-29.5-106.
(4) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERMUSTPROVIDEINTERPRETATION AND TRANSLATION SERVICES FOR COMMUNICATION WITH A PARENT WITH LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY.
(4) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MUST PROVIDE INTERPRETATIONANDTRANSLATIONSERVICESFORCOMMUNICATIONWITH A PARENT WITH LIMITEDENGLISH PROFICIENC.
(1) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ENSURE THAT COMMUNICATION WITH A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IS AS EFFECTIVE ASCOMMUNICATIONWITHASTUDENTWITHOUTADISABILITY .
(1) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ENSURE THAT COMMUNICATION WITH A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IS AS EFFECTIVE AS COMMUNICATION WITH A STUDENT WITHOUT A DISABILITY .
(2) ALOCALEDUCATION PROVIDER SHALLFURNISH APPROPRIATE -15- 125 AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO AFFORD A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERV,CPROGRAM ,OR ACTIVITY OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDE.
(2) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARYAIDSANDSERVICESWHERENECESSARYTOAFFORDAQUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE,PROGRAM ,OR ACTIVITY OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER .
(3) T HE TYPE OF AUXILIARY AID OR SERVICE NECESSARY TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATIONWITHA QUALIFIEDSTUDENT WITHA DISABILITY MAY VARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH TH:
(3) THE TYPE OFAUXILIARYAIDORSERVICENECESSARYTOENSURE EFFECTIVECOMMUNICATIONWITHAQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITY MAY VARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE :
(a) M ETHOD OF COMMUNICATION USED BY THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILIT;
(a) METHODOFCOMMUNICATIONUSEDBYTHE QUALIFIEDSTUDENT WITH A DISABILITY (b) N ATURE , LENGTH ,AND COMPLEXITY OF THE INVOLVED COMMUNICATION ;AND (c) CONTEXT IN WHICH THE COMMUNICATION IS TAKING PLACE .
(b) NATURE ,LENGTH , AND COMPLEXITY OF THE INVOLVED COMMUNICATION ;AND (c) CONTEXT IN WHICH THE COMMUNICATION IS TAKING PLAC.
PAGE 10-SENATE BILL 26-125 (4) NDETERMININGWHATTYPESOFAUXILIARYAIDSANDSERVICES ARENECESSARYTOENSUREEFFECTIVECOMMUNICATIONWITHAQUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY ,A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL GIVE PRIMARY CONSIDERATION TO THE REQUEST OF OR ON BEHALF OF A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY.
(4) I DETERMINING WHAT TYPES OF AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES ARE NECESSARY TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION WITH AQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITY ,ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDER SHALLGIVE PRIMARYCONSIDERATIONTOTHE REQUEST OFORONBEHALF OF A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY.
TO BE EFFECTIVE,AN AUXILIARY AID OR SERVICE MUST BE PROVIDED IN A FORMAT THAT IS ACCESSIBLE TO A QUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITY ,INATIMELYMANNER ANDINSUCH AWAYASTOPROTECT THE PRIVACYANDINDEPENDENCE OFTHE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY.
O BE EFFECTIVE, AN AUXILIARY AID OR SERVICE MUST BE PROVIDED IN A FORMAT THAT IS ACCESSIBLE TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILI,IN A TIMELY MANNER , AND IN SUCH A WAY AS TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILI.Y (5) (a) ALOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL NOT REQUIRE A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY TO PROVIDE AN INTERPRE.ER (b) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLNOTRELYONANADULT ACCOMPANYINGAQUALIFIEDSTUDENT WITH ADISABILITYTOINTERPRET OR FACILITATE COMMUNICATION,EXCEPT :
(5) (a) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL NOT REQUIRE A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY TO PROVIDE AN INTERPRETER.
(I) I AN EMERGENCY INVOLVING AN IMMINENT THREAT TO THE -16- 125 SAFETY OR WELFARE OF AN INDIVIDUAL OR THE PUBLIC AND NO INTERPRETER IS AVAILABL;OR (II) W HEN THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY SPECIFICALLYREQUESTSTHATTHEACCOMPANYINGADULTINTERPRETOR FACILITATE COMMUNICATION ,THE ACCOMPANYING ADULT AGREES TO PROVIDE SUCH ASSISTANCE,AND RELIANCE ON THAT ADULT FOR SUCH ASSISTANCE IS APPROPRIATE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCE.
(b) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL NOT RELY ON AN ADULT ACCOMPANYINGAQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITYTOINTERPRETOR FACILITATE COMMUNICATION ,EXCEPT :
(c) ALOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL NOT RELY ON A MINOR TO INTERPRET OR FACILITATE COMMUNICATION , EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY INVOLVING AN IMMINENT THREAT TO THE SAFETY OR WELFARE OF AN INDIVIDUAL OR THE PUBLIC AND NO INTERPRETER IS AVAILABLE .
(I) IN AN EMERGENCY INVOLVING AN IMMINENT THREAT TO THE SAFETYORWELFAREOFANINDIVIDUALORTHEPUBLICANDNOINTERPRETER IS AVAILABLE;OR (II) WHENTHEQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITYSPECIFICALLY REQUESTS THAT THE ACCOMPANYING ADULT INTERPRET OR FACILITATE COMMUNICATION , THE ACCOMPANYING ADULT AGREES TO PROVIDE SUCH ASSISTANCE ,AND RELIANCE ON THAT ADULT FOR SUCH ASSISTANCE IS APPROPRIATE UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES .
(c) A LOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLNOTRELYONAMINORTO INTERPRET OR FACILITATE COMMUNICATION ,EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY INVOLVING AN IMMINENT THREAT TO THE SAFETY OR WELFARE OF AN INDIVIDUAL OR THE PUBLIC AND NO INTERPRETER IS AVAILABLE.
N O QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY MAY BE DENIED THE BENEFITS OF,BE EXCLUDED FROM PARTICIPATION I,OR OTHERWISE BE SUBJECTED TO DISCRIMINATION UNDER A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDES PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES BECAUSE THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDERS FACILITIES ARE INACCESSIBLE TO OR CANNOT BE ACCESSED SAFELY BY PERSONS WITH DISABILITIE.
N O QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY MAY BE DENIED THE BENEFITS OF, BE EXCLUDED FROM PARTICIPATION IN ,OR OTHERWISE BE SUBJECTED TO DISCRIMINATION UNDER A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES BECAUSE THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S FACILITIES ARE INACCESSIBLE TO OR CANNOT BE ACCESSED SAFELY BY PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES .
N IMPLEMENTING THIS SECTION, LOCAL EDUCATIONPROVIDERSMAYREFERTOTHESECTION 504REGULATIONSAT SUBPART C,THE ADA REGULATIONS AT SUBPARTD, AND ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDSSUCHASTHE UNIFORM FEDERAL ACCESSIBILITYSTANDARDS , THE 1991ADA STANDARDSFORACCESSIBLEDESIGN ,ANDTHE 2010ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN.
N IMPLEMENTING THIS SECTION , LOCAL PAGE 11-SENATE BILL 26-125 EDUCATION PROVIDERS MAY REFER TO THE SECTION 504 REGULATIONS AT SUBPART C,THE ADA REGULATIONS AT SUBPART D, AND ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS SUCH AS THE UNIFORM FEDERAL A CCESSIBILITYSTANDARDS , THE 1991 ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN ,AND THE 2010 ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN .
(1)(a)A LOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLPROVIDEAFREEAND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION TO EACH QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A -17- 125 DISABILITY WHO IS IN THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDS JURISDICTIO, REGARDLESSOFTHENATUREORSEVERITYOFTHESTUDENT SDISABILITY.
(1) (a) ALOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL PROVIDE A FREE AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION TO EACH QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY WHO IS IN THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S JURISDICTION, REGARDLESS OF THE NATURE OR SEVERITY OF THE STUDENT S DISABILIT.
(b) IMPLEMENTATION OF AN IEP DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IDEA IS ONE WAY OF MEETING THE INDIVIDUAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS OF A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY AS ADEQUATELY AS THE NEEDS OF A STUDENT WITHOUT A DISABILITY ARE M.T (2) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ENSURE THAT A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY WITHIN THAT LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SJURISDICTIONRECEIVESANAPPROPRIATEEDUCATIONEVENIF THE STUDENT IS PLACED OR REFERRED TO A PROGRA,AID,BENEFIT,OR SERVICE OTHER THAN ONE OPERATED BY THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER .
(b) IPLEMENTATION OF AN IEPDEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IDEA IS ONE WAY OF MEETING THE INDIVIDUAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS OF A STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY AS ADEQUATELY AS THE NEEDS OF A STUDENT WITHOUT A DISABILITY ARE MET .
(3) AFREEEDUCATIONMAYCONSISTOFEITHERTHEPROVISIONOF FREE SERVICES ORPAYMENT TOATHIRDPARTYIFTHE LOCALEDUCATION PROVIDER PLACES A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IN A PROGRAM OTHER THAN ONE OPERATED BY THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER .
(2) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLENSURETHATAQUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY WITHIN THAT LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S JURISDICTIONRECEIVESANAPPROPRIATEEDUCATIONEVENIFTHESTUDENT IS PLACED OR REFERRED TO A PROGRAM ,AID,BENEFIT ,OR SERVICE OTHER THAN ONE OPERATED BY THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER .
(4) I A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER PLACES A QUALIFIED STUDENTWITHADISABILITYORREFERSSUCHSTUDENTFORAID ,BENEFITS, OR SERVICES AT A FACILITY NOT OPERATED OR PROVIDED BY THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER AS A MEANS OF PROVIDING A FREE AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION ,THE REFERRING LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ENSURE THAT THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITYHASADEQUATETRANSPORTATIONTOANDFROMTHEFACILITY WHERE THE AID , BENEFIT, OR SERVICES ARE PROVIDED .
(3) A FREE EDUCATION MAY CONSIST OF EITHER THE PROVISION OF FREE SERVICES OR PAYMENT TO A THIRD PARTY IF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER PLACES A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IN A PROGRAM OTHER THAN ONE OPERATED BY THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER .
T HE TRANSPORTATIONMUSTBEPROVIDEDATNOGREATERCOSTTHANWOULD BE INCURRED BY THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY OR THEIR -18- 125 PARENTIFTHESTUDENTRECEIVEDTHEAIDS BENEFITS,ORSERVICESFROM THE REFERRING LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER.
(4) IALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERPLACESAQUALIFIEDSTUDENT WITH A DISABILITY OR REFERS SUCH STUDENT FOR AID ,BENEFITS ,OR SERVICES AT A FACILITY NOT OPERATED OR PROVIDED BY THE LOCAL EDUCATIONPROVIDERASAMEANSOFPROVIDINGAFREEANDAPPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION ,THE REFERRING LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ENSURE THAT THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY HAS ADEQUATE TRANSPORTATIONTOANDFROMTHEFACILITYWHERETHEAID ,BENEFITS,OR SERVICES ARE PROVIDED .THE TRANSPORTATION MUST BE PROVIDED AT NO GREATERCOSTTHANWOULDBEINCURREDBYTHEQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITH A DISABILITY OR THEIR PARENT IF THE STUDENT RECEIVED THE AIDS , BENEFITS,ORSERVICESFROMTHEREFERRINGLOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDER .
(5) I IT IS NECESSARY FOR A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITYTOBE PLACEDIN APUBLICORPRIVATE RESIDENTIALFACILITY TO PROVIDE THE STUDENT WITH A FREE AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION ,AS DETERMINED BY A SECTIO504 TEAM OR IEPTEAM ,THE PLACEMENT , INCLUDING NONMEDICAL CARE AND ROOM AND BOARD , SHALL BE PROVIDED AT NO COST TO THE STUDENT OR THEIR PARENTS OR GUARDIANS .
PAGE 12-SENATE BILL 26-125 (5) FITISNECESSARYFORAQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITY TO BE PLACED IN A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL FACILITY TO PROVIDE THE STUDENT WITH A FREE AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION , AS DETERMINED BY A SECTION 504 TEAM OR IEP TEAM , THE PLACEMENT , INCLUDINGNONMEDICALCAREANDROOMANDBOARD ,SHALLBEPROVIDED AT NO COST TO THE STUDENT OR THEIR PARENTS OR GUARDIANS .
(6) IF A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER HAS MADE AVAILABLE A FREE AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND THE STUDENT S PARENTS OR GUARDIANS CHOOSE TO PLACE THE STUDENT IN A PRIVATE SCHOOL ,THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER IS NOT REQUIRED TO PAY FOR THE STUDENT'S EDUCATION IN THE PRIVATE SCHO.L 22-29.5-109.
(6) IA LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER HAS MADE AVAILABLE A FREE AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION TO A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND THE STUDENT S PARENTS OR GUARDIANS CHOOSE TO PLACE THE STUDENT IN A PRIVATE SCHOOL ,THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER IS NOT REQUIRED TO PAY FOR THE STUDENT'S EDUCATION IN THE PRIVATE SCHOOL .
Leastrestrictiveenvironment-academicsettings - nonacademic settings - comparable facilities.
22-29.5-109.
(1) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL PROVIDE A FREE AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION TO EACH QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION WITH STUDENTS WITHOUT DISABILITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT APPROPRIATE BASED ON THE NEEDS OF THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY .
Least restrictive environment - academic settings - nonacademic settings - comparable facilities.
A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL PLACE A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IN THE REGULAR EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OPERATED BY THELOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERUNLESSITISDEMONSTRATEDTHATTHE EDUCATION OF THE STUDENT IN THAT ENVIRONMENT CANNOT BE ACHIEVEDSATISFACTORILY EVENWITHTHEUSEOFSUPPLEMENTARYAIDS -19- 125 AND SERVICES .
(1) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL PROVIDE A FREE AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION TO EACH QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITYWITHINITSJURISDICTIONWITHSTUDENTSWITHOUTDISABILITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT APPROPRIATE BASED ON THE NEEDS OF THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY.
WHENEVER A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER PLACES A STUDENT IN A SETTING OTHER THAN THE REGULAR EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (1),IT SHALL CONSIDER THE PROXIMITY OF THE ALTERNATE SETTING TO THE STUDENTS HOME.
A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL PLACE A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IN THE REGULAR EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OPERATED BY THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER UNLESS IT IS DEMONSTRATED THAT THE EDUCATION OF THE STUDENT IN THAT ENVIRONMENT CANNOT BE ACHIEVED SATISFACTORILY , EVENWITHTHE USE OFSUPPLEMENTARYAIDSANDSERVICES .W HENEVERA LOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERPLACESASTUDENTINASETTINGOTHERTHAN THEREGULAREDUCATIONALENVIRONMENTPURSUANTTOTHISSUBSECTION (1)ITSHALLCONSIDERTHEPROXIMITYOFTHEALTERNATESETTINGTOTHE STUDENT S HOME .
(2) IN PROVIDING OR ARRANGING FOR THE PROVISION OF NONACADEMIC SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES ,INCLUDING MEALS,SPECIALS, RECESS PERIODS, AND EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES, A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ENSURE THAT A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY PARTICIPATES IN SUCH ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES WITH STUDENTSWITHOUTDISABILITIESTOTHEMAXIMUMEXTENTAPPROPRIATE BASED ON THE NEEDS OF THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILI.Y (3) IF A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER ,IN COMPLIANCE WITH SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION, OPERATES A FACILITY THAT IS IDENTIFIABLE AS BEING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIE,THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ENSURE THE FACILITY AND THE SERVICES ANDACTIVITIESPROVIDEDTHEREINARECOMPARABLETOTHEFACILITIES , SERVICES,AND ACTIVITIES OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDE.
(2) IN PROVIDING OR ARRANGING FOR THE PROVISION OF NONACADEMIC SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES , INCLUDING MEALS ,SPECIALS, RECESSPERIODS ,ANDEXTRACURRICULARACTIVITIES ,ALOCALEDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ENSURE THAT A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY PARTICIPATESINSUCHACTIVITIESANDSERVICESWITHSTUDENTSWITHOUT DISABILITIESTOTHEMAXIMUMEXTENTAPPROPRIATEBASEDONTHENEEDS OF THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY PAGE 13-SENATE BILL 26-125 (3) IF A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER , IN COMPLIANCE WITH SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION , OPERATES A FACILITY THAT IS IDENTIFIABLE AS BEING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES , THE LOCAL EDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLENSURETHEFACILITYANDTHESERVICESAND ACTIVITIES PROVIDED THEREIN ARE COMPARABLE TO THE FACILITIES , SERVICES,AND ACTIVITIES OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER .
(1) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLPROVIDENONACADEMIC ANDEXTRACURRICULARSERVICESANDACTIVITIESINSUCHASMANNERAS IS NECESSARY TO AFFORD A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SERVICES AND ACTIVITI.S N ONACADEMIC AND EXTRACURRICULAR SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES INCLUDE COUNSELING SERVICES ,TRANSPORTATION ,HEALTH SERVICES , ATHLETICS ,COURSES,SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS OR CLUB,REFERRALS , AND EMPLOYMENT OF STUDENTS .
(1) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL PROVIDE NONACADEMIC AND EXTRACURRICULAR SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES IN SUCH AS MANNER AS IS NECESSARY TO AFFORD A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SERVICES AND ACTIVITIES .
-20- 125 (2) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ENSURE THAT A QUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITYISNOTCOUNSELEDTOWARDMORE RESTRICTIVE CAREER OBJECTIVES THAN ARE STUDENTS WITHOUT DISABILITIES WITH SIMILAR INTERESTS AND ABIL.TIES (3) ALOCALEDUCATION PROVIDERTHAT PROVIDESSEPARATE OR DIFFERENTPHYSICALEDUCATIONANDATHLETICACTIVITIESTOSTUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES MAY DO SO ONLY IF CONSISTENT WITH THE LEAST RESTRICTIVEENVIRONMENTREQUIREMENTSINSECTION 22-29.5-109AND ONLY IF A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IS NOT DENIED THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMPETE FOR ATHLETIC TEAMS OR TO PARTICIPATE IN ATHLETICSCOURSESTHATARENOTSEPARATEORDIFFERENTFROMTHOSE TEAMS OR COURSES OFFERED TO STUDENTS WITHOUT DISABILITIES .
N ONACADEMICANDEXTRACURRICULARSERVICESANDACTIVITIESINCLUDE COUNSELING SERVICES ,TRANSPORTATION , HEALTH SERVICES ,ATHLETICS , COURSES , SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS OR CLUBS , REFERRALS , AND EMPLOYMENT OF STUDENTS .
C OMPETITIVE OR SELECTIVE PROGRAMS MAY REQUIRE A SELECTION PROCESS IF THE PROGRAM CRITERIA IS NOT DISCRIMINAT.RY 22-29.5-111.
(2) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLENSURETHATAQUALIFIED STUDENTWITHADISABILITYISNOTCOUNSELEDTOWARDMORERESTRICTIVE CAREER OBJECTIVES THAN ARE STUDENTS WITHOUT DISABILITIES WITH SIMILAR INTERESTS AND ABILITIES (3) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER THAT PROVIDES SEPARATE OR DIFFERENT PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES TO STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES MAY DO SO ONLY IF CONSISTENT WITH THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 22-29.5-109AND ONLY IF A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IS NOT DENIED THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMPETE FOR ATHLETIC TEAMS OR TO PARTICIPATE IN ATHLETICS COURSES THAT ARE NOT SEPARATE OR DIFFERENT FROM THOSE TEAMS OR COURSES OFFERED TO STUDENTS WITHOUT DISABILITIES .
COMPETITIVEORSELECTIVEPROGRAMSMAYREQUIREASELECTIONPROCESS IF THE PROGRAM CRITERIA IS NOT DISCRIMINATORY.
22-29.5-111.
(1) AT LEAST ANNUALLY ,A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MUST TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO IDENTIFY AND LOCATE EVERY QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY WHO RESIDES IN THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S JURISDICTION AND WHO IS NOT RECEIVING A PUBLIC EDUCATION AND TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO NOTIFY THEIR PARENT OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER'S DUTY TO IDENTIFY AND LOCATE THE STUDENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTIO.
(1) ATLEASTANNUALLY ,ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERMUSTTAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO IDENTIFY AND LOCATE EVERY QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY WHO RESIDES IN THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S PAGE 14-SENATE BILL 26-125 JURISDICTION AND WHO IS NOT RECEIVING A PUBLIC EDUCATION AND TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO NOTIFY THEIR PARENT OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S DUTY TO IDENTIFY AND LOCATE THE STUDENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION.
(2) PRIOR TO EVALUATING A STUDENT UNDER THIS SECTION,A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL NOTIFY THE STUDENT'S PARENT OF THE PROPOSEDEVALUATIONANDOBTAIN CONSENT FROM THE PARENT TO EVALUATE THE STUDENT .
(2) PRIORTOEVALUATINGASTUDENTUNDERTHISSECTION ,ALOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL NOTIFY THE STUDENT 'S PARENT OF THE PROPOSED EVALUATION AND OBTAIN CONSENT FROM THE PARENT TO EVALUATE THE STUDENT .
(3) I A STUDENT 'S PARENT CONSENTS TO AN EVALUATION -21- 125 PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTIO,A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALLCONDUCT AN EVALUATION OFANYSTUDENT WHO IS ,OR WHO IS BELIEVED TO BE,A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY TO DETERMINE IFTHE STUDENT IS A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABIL.TY (4) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLESTABLISHANDCOMPLY WITH STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATIONS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION AND SHALL ENSURE THAT :
(3) IASTUDENT SPARENTCONSENTSTOANEVALUATIONPURSUANT TOSUBSECTION (2)OFTHISSECTION ,ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALL CONDUCTANEVALUATIONOFANYSTUDENTWHOIS ,ORWHOISBELIEVEDTO BE,AQUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITYTODETERMINEIFTHESTUDENT IS A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY (4) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ESTABLISH AND COMPLY WITH STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATIONS THAT ARE CONSISTENTWITHTHEREQUIREMENTSOFTHISSECTIONANDSHALLENSURE THAT :
(a) TESTS AND OTHER EVALUATION MATERIALS HAVE BEEN VALIDATED FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH THEY ARE USED AND ARE ADMINISTERED BY TRAINED PERSONNELIN CONFORMANCE WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED BY THEIR PRODUCER;
(a) T ESTS AND OTHER EVALUATION MATERIALS HAVE BEEN VALIDATEDFORTHESPECIFICPURPOSEFORWHICHTHEYAREUSEDANDARE ADMINISTERED BY TRAINED PERSONNEL IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED BY THEIR PRODUCER ;
(b) TESTS AND OTHER EVALUATION MATERIALS INCLUDE THOSE CRITERIA TAILORED TO ASSESS SPECIFIC AREAS OF EDUCATIONAL NEED AND NOT MERELY THOSE WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A SINGLE GENERAL INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT ;AND (c) TESTS ARE SELECTED AND ADMINISTERED TO BEST ENSURE THAT ,WHEN A TEST IS ADMINISTERED TO A STUDENT WITH IMPAIRED SENSORY ,MANUAL ,ORSPEAKINGSKILLS ,THETESTRESULTSACCURATELY REFLECT THE STUDENT S APTITUDE OR ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL OR OTHER FACTOR THAT THE TEST PURPORTS TO MEASURE , RATHER THAN REFLECTING THE STUDENT S IMPAIRED SENSORY,MANUAL ,OR SPEAKING SKILLS,EXCEPT WHERE THOSE SKILLS ARE THE FACTORS THAT THE TEST PURPORTS TO MEASURE .
(b) T ESTS AND OTHER EVALUATION MATERIALS INCLUDE THOSE CRITERIATAILOREDTOASSESSSPECIFICAREASOFEDUCATIONALNEEDAND NOT MERELY THOSE WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE A SINGLE GENERAL INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT ;AND (c) TESTSARESELECTEDANDADMINISTEREDTOBESTENSURETHAT , WHEN A TEST IS ADMINISTERED TO A STUDENT WITH IMPAIRED SENSORY , MANUAL ,OR SPEAKING SKILLS,THE TEST RESULTS ACCURATELY REFLECT THE STUDENT SAPTITUDEORACHIEVEMENTLEVELOROTHERFACTORTHAT THETESTPURPORTSTOMEASURE ,RATHERTHANREFLECTINGTHESTUDENT S IMPAIRED SENSORY ,MANUAL ,OR SPEAKING SKILLS,EXCEPT WHERE THOSE SKILLS ARE THE FACTORS THAT THE TEST PURPORTS TO MEASURE .
(5) IN INTERPRETING EVALUATION DATA AND IN MAKING PLACEMENT DECISIONS ,A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL:
(5) IINTERPRETINGEVALUATIONDATAANDINMAKINGPLACEMENT PAGE 15-SENATE BILL 26-125 DECISIONS,A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL:
(a) D RAW UPON INFORMATION FROM A VARIETY OF SOURCES , -22- 125 INCLUDING APTITUDE AND ACHIEVEMENT TESTS, TEACHER RECOMMENDATIONS , PHYSICAL CONDITION , SOCIAL OR CULTURAL BACKGROUND ,AND ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR;
(a) D RAW UPON INFORMATION FROM A VARIETY OF SOURCES , INCLUDING APTITUDE AND ACHIEVEMENT TESTS , TEACHER RECOMMENDATIONS , PHYSICAL CONDITION, SOCIAL OR CULTURAL BACKGROUND ,AND ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR ;
(b) ENSURE THAT INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM ALL SUCH SOURCES IS DOCUMENTED AND CAREFULLY CONSIDERED ;
(b) ESURETHATINFORMATIONOBTAINEDFROMALLSUCHSOURCES IS DOCUMENTED AND CAREFULLY CONSIDERED ;
(c) E NSURE THAT THE ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION AND PLACEMENT DECISION IS MADE BY A GROUP OF PERSONS THAT ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE CHILD ,THE MEANING OF THE EVALUATION DATA ,AND THE PLACEMENT OPTIONS;AND (d) ENSURE THAT THE PLACEMENT DECISION IS MADE IN CONFORMITYWITHTHELEASTRESTRICTIVEENVIRONMENTPROVISIONSIN SECTION 22-29.5-109.
(c) ESURETHATTHEELIGIBILITYDETERMINATIONANDPLACEMENT DECISION IS MADE BY A GROUP OF PERSONS THAT ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE CHILD ,THE MEANING OF THE EVALUATION DATA ,AND THE PLACEMENT OPTIONS ;AND (d) NSURETHATTHEPLACEMENTDECISIONISMADEINCONFORMITY WITH THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT PROVISIONS IN SECTION 22-29.5-109.
(6) FOR STUDENTS IDENTIFIED AS ELIGIBLE PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE 29.5, LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDERS SHALL CONDUCT REEVALUATIONS AT LEAST EVERY THREE YEARS .
(6) F OR STUDENTS IDENTIFIED AS ELIGIBLE PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE 29.5, LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDERS SHALL CONDUCT REEVALUATIONS AT LEAST EVERYTHREE YEARS .C ONSENT FROM A PARENT IS NOT REQUIRED FOR A REEVALUATION.
CONSENT FROM A PARENT IS NOT REQUIRED FOR A REEVALUATIO.
(7) ALOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MAY SATISFY THE EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS IF:
(7) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERMAYSATISFYTHEEVALUATION REQUIREMENTS IF:
(a) THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER COMPLIES WITH THE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN SECTION22-29.5-112;AND (b) A GROUP OF KNOWLEDGEABLE PEOPLE , BASED ON EXISTING EVALUATION DATA , DETERMINE THE STUDENT S ELIGIBILITYAND PLACEMENT , INCLUDING THE SERVICES AND ACCOMMODATIONS THE STUDENTNEEDS ,ANDTHELOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERANDPARENTAGREE .
(a) THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER COMPLIES WITH THE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN SECTIO22-29.5-112;AND (b) A GROUP OF KNOWLEDGEABLE PEOPLE ,BASED ON EXISTING EVALUATION DATA , DETERMINE THE STUDENT S ELIGIBILITY AND PLACEMENT , INCLUDING THE SERVICES AND ACCOMMODATIONS THE STUDENT NEEDS ,AND THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER AND PARENT AGREE .
A LOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLESTABLISHANDIMPLEMENT , -23- 125 WITHRESPECTTOACTIONSREGARDINGTHEIDENTIFICATION ,EVALUATION , OR EDUCATIONAL PLACEMENT OF A STUDENT WHO MAY HAVE A DISABILITY,A SYSTEM OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS THAT INCLUDES NOTICEOFTHEPROPOSEDIDENTIFICATION ,EVALUATIONDETERMINATION , OREDUCATIONALPLACEMENT DECISION ,ANOPPORTUNITYFORAPARENT OF THE STUDENT TO EXAMINE RELEVANT RECORDS , AN IMPARTIAL HEARING WITH OPPORTUNITY FOR PARTICIPATION BY THE STUDENT S PARENTANDREPRESENTATIONBYLEGALCOUNSEL ,ANDANOPPORTUNITY TO APPEAL AN IMPARTIAL HEARING OUTCOME .
A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ESTABLISH AND IMPLEMENT, WITH RESPECT TO ACTIONS REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATIOEVALUATION , OREDUCATIONALPLACEMENTOFASTUDENTWHOMAYHAVEADISABILITY , A SYSTEM OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS THAT INCLUDES NOTICE OF THE PAGE 16-SENATE BILL 26-125 PROPOSEDIDENTIFICATION EVALUATIONDETERMINATION OREDUCATIONAL PLACEMENTDECISION ,ANOPPORTUNITYFORAPARENT OFTHE STUDENT TO EXAMINERELEVANTRECORDS ,ANIMPARTIALHEARINGWITHOPPORTUNITY FOR PARTICIPATION BY THE STUDENT'S PARENT AND REPRESENTATION BY LEGALCOUNSEL ,AND AN OPPORTUNITY TOAPPEALANIMPARTIALHEARING OUTCOME .COMPLIANCEWITHTHEPROCEDURALSAFEGUARDSOFTHE IDEA IS ONE MEANS OF MEETING THIS REQUIREMENT.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROCEDURALSAFEGUARDS OFTHE IDEA IS ONE MEANS OFMEETING THIS REQUIREMENT .
(1) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL ENSURE THAT A QUALIFIEDSTUDENTWITHADISABILITYISFREEFROMHARASSMENTTHAT CREATESAHOSTILEENVIRONMENT .A" HOSTILEENVIRONMENT "INCLUDES AN ENVIRONMENT THAT INTERFERES WITH OR LIMITS THE STUDENT S ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN OR BENEFIT FROM THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S SERVICE,ACTIVITIE,OR OPPORTUNITIES.
(1) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLENSURETHATAQUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY IS FREE FROM HARASSMENT THAT CREATES A HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT .
(2) WHENALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERKNOWSORREASONABLY SHOULD KNOW OF POSSIBLE DISABILITY-BASED HARASSMENT ,IT MUST TAKE IMMEDIATE AND APPROPRIATE ACTION TO INVESTIGATE OR OTHERWISE DETERMINE WHAT OCCURRED .
A " HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT " INCLUDES AN ENVIRONMENTTHATINTERFERESWITHORLIMITSTHESTUDENT 'SABILITYTO PARTICIPATE IN OR BENEFIT FROM THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S SERVICES,ACTIVITIES,OR OPPORTUNITIES.
(3) I THE INVESTIGATION REQUIRED BY SUBSECTIO(2)OF THIS SECTIONREVEALSTHATDISABILITY -BASEDHARASSMENTISSUFFICIENTLY SERIOUS TO CREATE A HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT,THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MUST TAKE PROMPT AND EFFECTIVE STEPS REASONABLY CALCULATED TO END THE DISABILITY-BASED HARASSMENT ,ELIMINATE -24- 125 THE HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT , PREVENT HARASSMENT AND A HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT FROM RECURRING ,AND ,AS APPROPRIATE,REMEDY THE HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT S EFFECT.
(2) W HEN A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER KNOWS OR REASONABLY SHOULDKNOWOFPOSSIBLEDISABILITY -BASEDHARASSMENT ,ITMUSTTAKE IMMEDIATE AND APPROPRIATE ACTION TO INVESTIGATE OR OTHERWISE DETERMINE WHAT OCCURRED .
(4) HARASSMENT ON ANY BASIS MAY ALSO IMPACT A QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITYS RECEIPT OF A FREE AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION,IN WHICH CASE THE EFFECTS OF HARASSMEN,EVEN IF NOT BASED ON DISABILIT,MUST BE ADDRESSED BY THE STUDENT S SECTION 504TEAM OR IEP TEAM.
(3) IF THE INVESTIGATION REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION REVEALS THAT DISABILITY-BASED HARASSMENT IS SUFFICIENTLY SERIOUS TO CREATE A HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT ,THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MUST TAKE PROMPT AND EFFECTIVE STEPS REASONABLY CALCULATEDTOENDTHEDISABILITY BASEDHARASSMENT ,ELIMINATETHE HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT , PREVENT HARASSMENT AND A HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT FROM RECURRING , AND ,AS APPROPRIATE ,REMEDY THE HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT 'S EFFECT.
(4) H ARASSMENT ON ANY BASIS MAY ALSO IMPACT A QUALIFIED STUDENTWITHADISABILITY 'SRECEIPTOFAFREEANDAPPROPRIATEPUBLIC EDUCATION ,IN WHICH CASE THE EFFECTS OF HARASSMENT ,EVEN IF NOT BASEDONDISABILITY ,MUSTBEADDRESSEDBYTHESTUDENT SSECTION 504 TEAM OR IEP TEAM .
(1) THE DEPARTMENT MAY PROVIDE TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCETOLOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSABOUTTHEREQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICL29.5.
PAGE 17-SENATE BILL 26-125 (1) T HE DEPARTMENT MAY PROVIDE TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDERS ABOUT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE29.5.
(2) THE DEPARTMENT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO INVESTIGATE AND RESOLVECOMPLAINTSOFALLEGEDVIOLATIONSOFTHISARTICLE 29.5AND THE AUTHORITY TO MONITOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
(2) T HE DEPARTMENT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO INVESTIGATE AND RESOLVE COMPLAINTS OF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5 AND THEAUTHORITYTOMONITORTHEIMPLEMENTATIONOFTHEREQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
THIS ARTICLE29.5 DOES NOT CREATE NEW AUTHORITY FOR MATTERS INVOLVING THE IDENTIFICATIO, EVALUATION , PLACEMENT , OR PROVISION OF A FREE EDUCATION PURSUANT TO AN IEP.
THIS ARTICLE 29.5 DOES NOT CREATE NEW AUTHORITY FOR MATTERS INVOLVING THE IDENTIFICATION ,EVALUATION , PLACEMENT ,OR PROVISION OF A FREE EDUCATION PURSUANT TO AN IEP.
(3) ACOMPLAINANT MUST ALLEGE VIOLATIONS THAT OCCURRED WITHIN ONE CALENDAR YEAR BEFORE THE DATE THE COMPLAINT IS FILED WITHTHEDEPARTMENT ORWITHINSIXTYDAYSFOLLOWINGRESOLUTION OR TERMINATION OF THE PROCESS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTI(6)OF THIS SECTION.
(3) A COMPLAINANT MUST ALLEGE VIOLATIONS THAT OCCURRED WITHIN ONE CALENDAR YEAR BEFORE THE DATE THE COMPLAINT IS FILED WITHTHEDEPARTMENT ,ORWITHINSIXTYDAYSFOLLOWINGRESOLUTIONOR TERMINATION OF THE PROCESS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (6)OF THIS SECTION .
(4) T HE COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION SHALL NOT HAVE -25- 125 JURISDICTIONOVERALLEGATIONSORCOMPLAINTSTHATFALLWITHINTHE SCOPE OF THIS ARTICLE29.5.
(4) T HE C OLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION SHALL NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ALLEGATIONS OR COMPLAINTS THAT FALL WITHIN THE SCOPE OFTHIS ARTICLE 29.5.THE C OLORADOCIVILRIGHTSDIVISIONSHALL ESTABLISH A SYSTEM TO ENSURE SUCH ALLEGATIONS OR COMPLAINTS ARE REFERRED TO THE DEPARTMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS OF RECEIVING AN ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT .
THE COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION SHALL ESTABLISH A SYSTEM TO ENSURE SUCH ALLEGATIONS OR COMPLAINTS ARE REFERRED TO THE DEPARTMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS OF RECEIVING AN ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT.
(5) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL DISMISS AN ALLEGATION IN A COMPLAINT ,OR THE ENTIRE COMPLAINT ,I:
(5) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL DISMISS AN ALLEGATION IN A COMPLAINT ,OR THE ENTIRE COMPLAIN,IF:
(a) (I) THE ALLEGATION ,ON ITS FACE OR AS CLARIFIED ,FAILS TO STATE A VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5,WHEN THE ALLEGATION ,ON ITS FACE OR AS CLARIFIED,LACKS SUFFICIENT FACTUAL DETAIL ,OR WHEN THE ALLEGATION IS SO SPECULATIVE ,CONCLUSORY ,OR INCOHERENT ,THAT THE DEPARTMENT CANNOT REASONABLY INFER THAT A VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5OCCURRED OR MAY BE OCCURRING ;OR (II) PRIOR TO DISMISSING AN ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT FOR ONE OF THE REASONS SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (5)(a)(IOF THIS SECTION,THE DEPARTMENT MAY REQUEST FROM THE COMPLAINANT INFORMATION TO FURTHER ASSESS WHETHER THE ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT SHOULD BE DISMISSED FOR A REASON SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (5)(a)(IOF THIS SECTION .
(a) (I)HE ALLEGATION ON ITS FACE OR AS CLARIFI,FAILS TO STATEAVIOLATIONOFTHISARTICLE 29.5,WHENTHEALLEGATION ,ONITS FACEORASCLARIFIED ,LACKSSUFFICIENTFACTUALDETAIL ,ORWHENTHE ALLEGATION IS SO SPECULATIV, CONCLUSORY ,OR INCOHERENT ,THAT THEDEPARTMENTCANNOTREASONABLYINFERTHATAVIOLATIONOFTHIS ARTICLE 29.5OCCURRED OR MAY BE OCCURRING ;OR (II) PIORTODISMISSINGANALLEGATIONORCOMPLAINTFORONE OFTHEREASONSSPECIFIEDINSUBSECTION (5)(a)(IOFTHISSECTION,THE DEPARTMENT MAY REQUEST FROM THE COMPLAINANT INFORMATION TO FURTHER ASSESS WHETHER THE ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT SHOULD BE DISMISSED FOR A REASON SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION(5)(a)(IOF THIS SECTION.THECOMPLAINANTHASFOURTEENDAYSFROMTHEDATEOFTHE DEPARTMENT 'SREQUESTTOPROVIDETHEREQUESTEDINFORMATION .THE DEPARTMENT MAY DISMISS AN ALLEGATION OR THE COMPLAINT IF THE INFORMATION IS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS OF THE DEPARTMENT 'S REQUEST, IF THE INFORMATION DOES NOT ESTABLISH JURISDICTIO,ORIFTHEINFORMATIONDOESNOTSUFFICIENTLYADDRESS THE FACTORS IN SUBSECTION (5)(a)(I)OF THIS SECTION, IN THE DEPARTMENT 'S DISCRETIO.
HE COMPLAINANT HAS FOURTEEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE PAGE 18-SENATE BILL 26-125 DEPARTMENT S REQUEST TO PROVIDE THE REQUESTED INFORMATION .
(b) BASEDONALLOFTHEFACTSPROVIDEDBYTHECOMPLAINANT , -26- 125 THE DEPARTMENT CANNOT REASONABLY CONCLUDE THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER HAS VIOLATED THIS ARTICL29.5;
THE DEPARTMENT MAY DISMISS AN ALLEGATION OR THE COMPLAINT IF THE INFORMATION IS NOT RECEIVED WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS OF THE DEPARTMENT S REQUEST , IF THE INFORMATION DOES NOT ESTABLISH JURISDICTION,OR IF THE INFORMATION DOES NOT SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESS THE FACTORS IN SUBSECTION (5)(a)(I)OF THIS SECTION , IN THE DEPARTMENT S DISCRETION.
(c) THE ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT IS NOT TIMELY FILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT ;
(b) BASED ON ALL OF THE FACTS PROVIDED BY THE COMPLAINANT , THEDEPARTMENTCANNOTREASONABLYCONCLUDETHELOCALEDUCATION PROVIDER HAS VIOLATED THIS ARTICLE 29.5;
(d) THE COMPLAINT IS FILED AGAINST A PERSON OR ENTITY THAT IS NOT A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDE;
(c) THE ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT IS NOT TIMELYFILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT ;
(e) THE DEATH OF THE COMPLAINANT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO FULLY INVESTIGATE THE ALLEGATION;
(d) THE COMPLAINT IS FILED AGAINST A PERSON OR ENTITY THAT IS NOT A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER ;
(f) TEDEATHOFTHECOMPLAINANTFORECLOSESTHEPOSSIBILITY OF INDIVIDUAL RELIE;
(e) T HE DEATH OF THE COMPLAINANT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO FULLY INVESTIGATE THE ALLEGATION ;
(g) THE SAME OR SIMILAR ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED WITHORISBEINGINVESTIGATEDBYANOTHERAGENCY ,INCLUDING THEDEPARTMENT SDISPUTERESOLUTIONOFFICEORTHROUGHTHELOCAL EDUCATIONPROVIDER 'SINTERNALGRIEVANCEPROCESS .ACOMPLAINANT MAY FILE OR REFILE AN ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT WITH THE DEPARTMENT WITHIN SIXTY DAYS AFTER THE TERMINATION OF THE DEPARTMENT 'S DISPUTE RESOLUTION OFFICS PROCESS OR THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S INTERNAL GRIEVANCE PROCESS.
(f) THE DEATH OFTHE COMPLAINANT FORECLOSES THE POSSIBILITY OF INDIVIDUAL RELIEF;
T HE DEPARTMENT SHALL REVIEW WHETHER THE OTHER AGENCY S PROCESS METACCEPTABLELEGALSTANDARDSORMAYCHOOSETOINVESTIGATEON ITS OWN.
(g) T HE SAME OR SIMILAR ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED WITH OR IS BEING INVESTIGATED BY ANOTHER AGENCY ,INCLUDING THE DEPARTMENT S DISPUTE RESOLUTION OFFICE OR THROUGH THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S INTERNAL GRIEVANCE PROCESS .
(h) THE SAME ORSIMILARALLEGATIONORCOMPLAINT ,BASEDON THE SAME FACTS,HAS ALREADY BEEN RESOLVED BY THE DEPARTMENT , ANOTHER AGENCY ,OR THROUGH THE DISTRICTS INTERNAL GRIEVANCE PROCESS,USING ACCEPTABLE LEGAL STANDARDS ;
ACOMPLAINANT MAYFILEORREFILEANALLEGATIONORCOMPLAINTWITHTHEDEPARTMENT WITHIN SIXTY DAYS AFTER THE TERMINATION OF THE DEPARTMENT S DISPUTE RESOLUTION OFFICE S PROCESS OR THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S INTERNAL GRIEVANCE PROCESS .
(i) TE SAME OR SIMILAR ALLEGATION OR COMPLAIN,BASED ON THESAMEFACTS ,HASALREADYBEENFILEDINSTATEORFEDERALCOURT .
THE DEPARTMENT SHALL REVIEW WHETHER THE OTHER AGENCY 'S PROCESS MET ACCEPTABLE LEGAL STANDARDS OR MAY CHOOSE TO INVESTIGATE ON ITS OWN .
-27- 125 IF THE COURT CASE ENDS WITHOUT A DECISION ON THE MERITS OR A SETTLEMENT ,THE COMPLAINT MAY BE FILED OR REFILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF THE END OF THE COURT CAS.
(h) T HE SAME OR SIMILAR ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT ,BASED ON THE SAME FACTS ,HAS ALREADY BEEN RESOLVED BY THE DEPARTMENT , ANOTHER AGENCY ,OR THROUGH THE DISTRICT S INTERNAL GRIEVANCE PROCESS ,USING ACCEPTABLE LEGAL STANDARDS ;
OR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTI,A DISMISSALWITH PREJUDICE IS CONSIDERED A DECISION ON THE MERITS AND A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS NOT A DECISION ON THE MERIT.
PAGE 19-SENATE BILL 26-125 (i) THE SAME OR SIMILAR ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT , BASED ON THE SAME FACTS ,HAS ALREADY BEEN FILED IN STATE OR FEDERAL COURT .
(j) THE DEPARTMENT OBTAINS CREDIBLE INFORMATION INDICATING THAT THE ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT IS RESOLVED AND THEREFORE NO LONGER APPROPRIATE FOR INVESTIGATION PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE29.5;
IF THE COURT CASE ENDS WITHOUT A DECISION ON THE MERITS OR A SETTLEMENT ,THE COMPLAINT MAY BE FILED OR REFILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF THE END OF THE COURT CASE .
(k) ACOMPLAINTISFILEDAGAINSTALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDER THAT RAISES THE SAME OR SIMILAR ALLEGATION BASED ON THE SAME FACTS AGAINST THE SAME LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY DISMISSED OR CLOSED BY THE DEPARTMEN;
OR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION,A DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE IS CONSIDERED A DECISION ON THE MERITS AND A DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS NOT A DECISION ON THE MERITS .
(l) TE DEPARTMENT RECENTLYINVESTIGATEDORISCURRENTLY INVESTIGATING THE SAME OR SIMILAR ALLEGATION BASED ON THE SAME FACTS INVOLVING THE SAME LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER;
(j) THEDEPARTMENTOBTAINSCREDIBLE INFORMATIONINDICATING THAT THE ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT IS RESOLVED AND THEREFORE NO LONGERAPPROPRIATEFORINVESTIGATIONPURSUANTTOTHISARTICLE 29.5;
(m) THECOMPLAINANTWITHDRAWSTHECOMPLAINTCONTAINING THE ALLEGATION;OR (n) THE ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT IS MOOT OR UNRI.E (6) (a) TE DEPARTMENT MAY DISMISS AN ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT IF:
(k) A COMPLAINT IS FILED AGAINST A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER THATRAISESTHESAMEORSIMILARALLEGATIONBASEDONTHESAMEFACTS AGAINST THE SAME LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY DISMISSED OR CLOSED BY THE DEPARTMENT ;
(I) TE DEPARTMENT 'S ABILITY TO COMPLETE AN INVESTIGATION ISSUBSTANTIALLYIMPAIREDBYTHECOMPLAINANT SREFUSALTOPROVIDE INFORMATION THAT IS REASONABLY ACCESSIBLE TO THE COMPLAINANT AND IS NECESSARY FOR INVESTIGATION OF THE COMPLAINT .
(l) THE DEPARTMENT RECENTLY INVESTIGATED OR IS CURRENTLY INVESTIGATING THE SAME OR SIMILAR ALLEGATION BASED ON THE SAME FACTS INVOLVING THE SAME LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER ;
THE DEPARTMENT SHALL INCLUDE DOCUMENTATION IN THE CASE FILE OF ITS -28- 125 EFFORTS TO CONTACT THE COMPLAINANT BY PHONE,IN WRITINGOR VIA EMAIL TO REQUEST THE NECESSARY INFORMATION AND OF THE COMPLAINANT 'S REFUSAL TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATI.N (II) TEDEPARTMENT SABILITYTOCOMPLETEANINVESTIGATION ISSUBSTANTIALLYIMPAIREDBYTHECOMPLAINANT 'SFAILURETOTIMELY RESPOND TO THE DEPARTMENT 'S COMMUNICATIONS .
(m) T HE COMPLAINANT WITHDRAWS THE COMPLAINT CONTAINING THE ALLEGATION ;
HE DEPARTMENT SHALLINCLUDEDOCUMENTATIONINTHECASEFILEOFITSUNSUCCESSFUL EFFORTS TO CONTACT THE COMPLAINANT BY PHONE OR IN WRITING TO REQUEST THE NECESSARY INFORMATION .
OR (n) THE ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT IS MOOT OR UNRIPE .
(III) TE ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT ALLEGES A VIOLATION FOR WHICH NO RELIEF IS AVAILAB.E (b) THE DEPARTMENT HAS THE SOLE DISCRETION TO DETERMINE WHETHER DISMISSAL CRITERIA ARE ME.
(6) (a) T HE DEPARTMENT MAY DISMISS AN ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT IF :
(7) TEDEPARTMENTHASTHEAUTHORITYTOENFORCEDECISIONS ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND REQUIRE A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION IF THERE IS A FINDING OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE29.5.
(I) THE DEPARTMENT S ABILITY TO COMPLETE AN INVESTIGATION IS SUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIRED BY THE COMPLAINANT S REFUSAL TO PROVIDE INFORMATIONTHATISREASONABLYACCESSIBLETOTHECOMPLAINANTAND IS NECESSARY FOR INVESTIGATION OF THE COMPLAINT .
N DETERMINING WHETHER A LOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERHASCOMPLIEDWITHTHISARTICLE 29.5THE DEPARTMENT MAY RELY ON INTERPRETATIONS BY FEDERAL COURTS AND AGENCIESOFSECTION 504 ANDTHE ADA.A LOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDER SHALLCORRECTITSNONCOMPLIANCEWITHTHISARTICLE 29.5ASSOONAS POSSIBLE AND WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME FRAME THAT IS SPECIFIED BY THE DEPARTMENT IN AN ORDER.
THE DEPARTMENT SHALL INCLUDE DOCUMENTATION IN THE CASE FILE OF ITS EFFORTS TO CONTACT THE COMPLAINANT BY PHONE ,IN WRITING ,OR VIA EMAIL TO REQUEST THE NECESSARY INFORMATION AND OF THE COMPLAINANT 'S REFUSAL TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION .
(8) NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 31, 2026THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY ADOPT RULES TO ESTABLISH THE DEFINITION OF ANY TERM NOT SPECIFICALLY DEFINED IN THIS ARTIC29.5;UNIFORM AND TIMELY METHODS OF COMPLAINT RESOLUTION , INCLUDING RULES -29- 125 PROVIDING FOR THE PROCESS OF FILING A COMPLAINT , WHETHER VOLUNTARYMEDIATIONISAVAILABLE ,ORANYOTHERRELIEFAVAILABLE PRIOR TO THE CONCLUSION OF A FINDING OF NONCOMPLIANCE ;
(II) TEDEPARTMENT 'SABILITYTOCOMPLETEANINVESTIGATIONIS PAGE 20-SENATE BILL 26-125 SUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIRED BY THE COMPLAINANT 'S FAILURE TO TIMELY RESPOND TO THE DEPARTMENT S COMMUNICATIONS .
AND WHETHER WRITTEN CONSENT TO INVESTIGATE AN ALLEGATION IS REQUIRED .
THE DEPARTMENT SHALL INCLUDE DOCUMENTATION IN THE CASE FILE OF ITS UNSUCCESSFUL EFFORTS TO CONTACT THE COMPLAINANT BY PHONE OR IN WRITING TO REQUEST THE NECESSARY INFORMATION .
COMPLAINTS MAY BE FILED BY A PARENT , GUARDIAN , STUDENT , OR THIRD PARTY .
(III) TE ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT ALLEGES A VIOLATION FOR WHICH NO RELIEF IS AVAILABLE (b) T HE DEPARTMENT HAS THE SOLE DISCRETION TO DETERMINE WHETHER DISMISSAL CRITERIA ARE MET.
ATHIRD PARTY MAY ONLY FILE A COMPLAINT ALLEGING VIOLATIONS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5 IF THE ALLEGATIONS ARE SYSTEMIC IN NATURE OR IF THE COMPLAINT IS ON BEHALF OF AN INDIVIDUAL STUDENT THE THIRD PARTY IS REPRESENTING AS AN ATTORNEY OR ADVOCATE .
(7) THE DEPARTMENT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE DECISIONS ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND REQUIRE A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION IF THERE IS A FINDING OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
FOR THE COMPLAINT PROCESS ,THE TIMELINE SHALL BE NO LONGER THAN ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING TO THE DATE OF RESOLUT,WITH THE ABILITY TO PAUSE THE TIMELINE FOR UP TO SIXTY DAYS PENDING ATTEMPTED RESOLUTION THROUGH OTHER METHODS , INCLUDING VOLUNTARY MEDIATION .
N DETERMINING WHETHER A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER HAS COMPLIED WITH THIS ARTICLE 29.5,THE DEPARTMENT MAY RELY ON INTERPRETATIONS BY FEDERAL COURTS AND AGENCIES OF SECTION504 AND THE ADA.A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL CORRECT ITS NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE 29.5AS SOON AS POSSIBLEANDWITHINAREASONABLETIMEFRAMETHATISSPECIFIEDBYTHE DEPARTMENT IN AN ORDER .
(9)(a) ITHEDEPARTMENTISACCEPTINGCOMPLAINTS ,APARENT , GUARDIAN ,STUDENT OR THIRD PARTY MAY FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGING A VIOLATION OFTHISARTICLE29.5ONLY AFTER :
(8) N O LATER THAN DECEMBER 31, 2026,THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATIONMAYADOPTRULESTOESTABLISHTHEDEFINITIONOFANYTERM NOT SPECIFICALLY DEFINED IN THIS ARTICLE29.5;UNIFORM AND TIMELY METHODS OF COMPLAINT RESOLUTION ,INCLUDING RULES PROVIDING FOR THEPROCESSOFFILINGACOMPLAINT ,WHETHERVOLUNTARYMEDIATIONIS AVAILABLE ,OR ANY OTHER RELIEF AVAILABLE PRIOR TO THE CONCLUSION OF A FINDING OF NONCOMPLIANCE ;AND WHETHER WRITTEN CONSENT TO INVESTIGATE AN ALLEGATION IS REQUIRED.COMPLAINTS MAY BE FILED BY A PARENT ,GUARDIAN ,STUDENT , OR THIRD PARTY.
(I) URSUING RESOLUTION OF THE SAME ALLEGATION THROUGH THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER 'S DISABILITY RIGHTS GRIEVANCE PROCESS DESCRIBED IN SECTIO22-29.5-104AND (II) (A) THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER ISSUES A FINAL DECISION;OR (B) THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDERS FINAL DECISION HAS NOT BEENPROVIDEDTOTHE COMPLAINANT WITHINSIXTYDAYSOFTHELOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAIN.
A THIRD PARTY MAY ONLYFILEACOMPLAINTALLEGINGVIOLATIONSOFTHISARTICLE 29.5IFTHE ALLEGATIONSARESYSTEMICINNATUREORIFTHECOMPLAINTISONBEHALF OF AN INDIVIDUAL STUDENT THE THIRD PARTY IS REPRESENTING AS AN ATTORNEY OR ADVOCATE .
(b)(I) TEREQUIREMENTSOFSUBSECTION (9)(aOFTHISSECTION -30- 125 MAY BE WAIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT IF:
OR THE COMPLAINT PROCESS ,THE TIMELINE SHALLBENOLONGERTHANONEHUNDREDEIGHTYDAYSFROMTHEDATEOF FILING TO THE DATE OF RESOLUTION ,WITH THE ABILITY TO PAUSE THE TIMELINE FOR UP TO SIXTY DAYS PENDING ATTEMPTED RESOLUTION THROUGH OTHER METHODS ,INCLUDING VOLUNTARY MEDIATION .
(A) THE COMPLAINANT DEMONSTRATES THAT USING THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S DISABILITY RIGHTS GRIEVANCE PROCESS WOULD BE FUTILE OR LIKELY CAUSE IRREPARABLE HARM TO THE STUDEN;OR (B) THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER DOES NOT HAVE A PROMPT AND EQUITABLE OR READILY AVAILABLE DISABILITY RIGHTS GRIEVANCE PROCESS .
PAGE 21-SENATE BILL 26-125 (9) (a) F THE DEPARTMENT IS ACCEPTING COMPLAINTS ,A PARENT , GUARDIAN , STUDENT ,OR THIRD PARTY MAY FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGING A VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5ONLY AFTER :
(II) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE29.5,TO BE CONSIDERED FUTILE,THECOMPLAINANTMUSTSHOWTHATPURSUINGRESOLUTIONWITH THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER WOULD BE POINTLESS OR INEFFECTIVE IN PROVIDING RELIE.
(I) PURSUINGRESOLUTIONOFTHESAMEALLEGATIONTHROUGHTHE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S DISABILITY RIGHTS GRIEVANCE PROCESS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 22-29.5-104;AND (II)(A) THELOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERISSUESAFINALDECISION ;
XAMPLES WHERE FUTILITY MAY APPLY INCLUDE:
OR (B) T HE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER 'S FINAL DECISION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPLAINANT WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT.
(A) THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER LACKS THE AUTHORITY TO GRANT THE RELIEF SOUGHT;
(b) (I) TE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION (9)(aOF THIS SECTION MAY BE WAIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT IF :
(B) T HE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S PROCESS IS BIASED OR UNFAIR,AND THUS UNLIKELY TO RESULT IN A FAIR OUTCOM;HOWEVER , THE COMPLAINT RECIPIENT AND THE ALLEGED DISCRIMINATORY ENTITY BOTHBEINGTHELOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDER ,ALONE ISINSUFFICIENTTO DEMONSTRATE BIAS OR UNFAIRNESS ;
(A) T HE COMPLAINANT DEMONSTRATES THAT USING THE LOCAL EDUCATIONPROVIDER SDISABILITYRIGHTSGRIEVANCEPROCESSWOULDBE FUTILE OR LIKELY CAUSE IRREPARABLE HARM TO THE STUDENT ;OR (B) T HE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER DOES NOT HAVE A PROMPT AND EQUITABLE OR READILY AVAILABLE DISABILITY RIGHTS GRIEVANCE PROCESS .
(C) T HERE IS A PATTERN OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER FAILING TO RESPOND IN A TIMELY OR APPROPRIATE MANNER TO COMPLAINTS ;OR (D) THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER HAS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATEDUNWILLINGNESSTOCOMPLYWITHORPARTICIPATEINTHE PROCESS IN GOOD FAIT.
(II) FRPURPOSESOFTHISARTICLE 29.5,TOBECONSIDEREDFUTILE , THE COMPLAINANT MUST SHOW THAT PURSUING RESOLUTION WITH THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER WOULD BE POINTLESS OR INEFFECTIVE IN PROVIDING RELIEF.
(10) N OTHING IN THIS ARTICL29.5 SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO AFFECT ANY ADMINISTRATIVE EXHAUSTION REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL LAW ,INCLUDING THEIDEA AND SECTION 504.
EXAMPLES WHERE FUTILITY MAY APPLY INCLUDE :
-31- 125 (11) N O PUBLIC ENTITY SHALL ASSERT ANY PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5ASADEFENSETOACLAIMBROUGHTPURSUANTTOFEDERAL LAW ,INCLUDING PURSUANT TO THE IDEA AND SECTION 504.
(A) T HE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER LACKS THE AUTHORITY TO GRANT THE RELIEF SOUGHT ;
(B) T HE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S PROCESS IS BIASED OR UNFAIR ANDTHUSUNLIKELYTORESULTINAFAIROUTCOME ;HOWEVER ,THE COMPLAINT RECIPIENT AND THE ALLEGED DISCRIMINATORY ENTITY BOTH BEING THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER ,ALONE , IS INSUFFICIENT TO DEMONSTRATE BIAS OR UNFAIRNESS ;
PAGE 22-SENATE BILL 26-125 (C) T HERE IS A PATTERN OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER FAILINGTORESPONDINATIMELYORAPPROPRIATEMANNERTOCOMPLAINTS ;
OR (D) THELOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERHASCLEARLYDEMONSTRATED UNWILLINGNESSTOCOMPLYWITHORPARTICIPATEINTHEPROCESSINGOOD FAITH.
(10) NOTHINGINTHISARTICLE 29.5SHALLBECONSTRUEDTOAFFECT ANY ADMINISTRATIVE EXHAUSTION REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL LAW , INCLUDING THE IDEA AND SECTION 504.
(11) N O PUBLIC ENTITY SHALL ASSERT ANY PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5AS A DEFENSE TO A CLAIM BROUGHT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL LAW ,INCLUDING PURSUANT TO THE IDEA AND SECTION 504.
Effectivedate-repealofpart-gifts,grants,and donations.
Effective date - repeal of part - gifts, grants, and donations.
(1) THE DEPARTMENT MAY SEEK FUNDING FROM GIFTS ,GRANTS , DONATIONS ,AND OTHER AGREEMENTS FOR RESOURCES TO SUPPORT THE EXECUTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 22-29.5-114 AND 22-29.5-115.THEDEPARTMENTMAYCONTRACTWITHTHIRDPARTIESAND OTHER STATE AGENCIES TO SUPPORT THE EXECUTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS22-29.5-114AND 22-29.5-115.
(1) T HE DEPARTMENT MAY SEEK FUNDING FROM GIFTS ,GRANTS , DONATIONS , AND OTHER AGREEMENTS FOR RESOURCES TO SUPPORT THE EXECUTIONOFTHEPROVISIONSOFSECTIONS 22-29.5-114AND 22-29.5-115.
(2)(a)S ECTIONS22-29.5-114AND22-29.5-115WILLTAKEEFFECT IF THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVES SUFFICIENT FUNDING OR RESOURCES TO SUPPORT THE EXECUTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS22-29.5-114 AND 22-29.5-115.THECOMMISSIONEROFTHEDEPARTMENTSHALLNOTIFY THEREVISOROFSTATUTESINWRITINGOFTHEDATEWHENTHECONDITION SPECIFIED IN THIS SUBSECTIO(2)(a)HAS OCCURRED BY EMAILING THE NOTICETOREVISOROFSTATUTES .GA@ COLEG GOV .SECTIONS22-29.5-114 AND 22-29.5-115TAKESEFFECTUPONTHEDATEIDENTIFIEDINTHENOTICE THATTHECONDITIONSPECIFIEDINTHISSUBSECTION (2)(aHASOCCURRED OR ,IF THE NOTICE DOES NOT SPECIFY THAT D,UPON THE DATE OF THE NOTICE TO THE REVISOR OF STATUTE.
THE DEPARTMENT MAY CONTRACT WITH THIRD PARTIES AND OTHER STATE AGENCIES TO SUPPORT THE EXECUTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 22-29.5-114AND 22-29.5-115.
(b) SECTIONS 22-29.5-114, 22-29.5-11AND THIS SECTION ARE REPEALED , EFFECTIVEJULY 1, 2028,IF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENTOFEDUCATIONHASNOTNOTIFIEDTHEREVISOROFSTATUTES THAT THE CONDITIONSPECIFIEDINSUBSECTION (2)(a)HAS OCCURRED BY JUNE 30, 2028.
(2) (a) SCTIONS 22-29.5-114AND 22-29.5-115WILL TAKE EFFECT IF THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVES SUFFICIENT FUNDING OR RESOURCES TO SUPPORTTHEEXECUTIONOFTHEPROVISIONSOFSECTIONS 22-29.5-114 AND 22-29.5-115.
-32- 125 22-29.5-115.
HE COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT SHALL NOTIFY THE REVISOR OF STATUTES IN WRITING OF THE DATE WHEN THE CONDITION SPECIFIED IN THIS SUBSECTION (2)(a)HAS OCCURRED BY EMAILING THE NOTICE TO REVISOROFSTATUTES GA @ COLEG GOV .
ECTIONS 22-29.5-114 AND 22-29.5-115 TAKE EFFECT UPON THE DATE IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE THAT THE CONDITION SPECIFIED IN THIS SUBSECTION2)(a)HAS OCCURRED OR, IF THE NOTICE DOES NOT SPECIFY THAT DATE,UPON THE DATE OF THE NOTICE TO THE REVISOR OF STATUTES.
(b) S ECTIONS 22-29.5-114, 22-29.5-115AND THIS SECTION ARE REPEALED , EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2028, IF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE PAGE 23-SENATE BILL 26-125 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HAS NOT NOTIFIED THE REVISOR OF STATUTES THAT THE CONDITION SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (2)(a)HAS OCCURRED BY JUNE 30, 2028.
22-29.5-115.
(1) ITHEDEPARTMENTFINDSAVIOLATIONOFTHISARTICLE 29.5, IT MAY ORDER:
(1) IF THE DEPARTMENT FINDS A VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5, IT MAY ORDER :
(a) AN AUDIT OF A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDE;
(a) A N AUDIT OF A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER ;
(b) THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER ;
(b) T HE ESTABLISHMENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANS TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER ;
(c) THAT COMPENSATORY SERVICES OR OTHER INDIVIDUAL REMEDIALMEASURES BE PROVIDED BY THE LOCALEDUCATION PROVIDER TO THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILI;Y (d) TRAINING OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDES STAFF;
(c) THAT COMPENSATORY SERVICES OR OTHER INDIVIDUAL REMEDIALMEASURESBEPROVIDEDBYTHELOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERTO THE QUALIFIED STUDENT WITH A DISABILITY ;
(e) THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER TO ADOPT NEW OR REVISED POLICIE,PROCEDURES ,RULES,AND FORMS ;
(d) TRAINING OF THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S STAFF;
(f) TE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER TO PROVIDE OR REINSTATE SERVICES OR BENEFITS WRONGFULLY DENIED;AND (g) A NY OTHER REMEDY NECESSARY , AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT , TO REMEDY VIOLATIONS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5 AND PROSPECTIVELY ENSURE COMPLIANCE .
(e) T HE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER TO ADOPT NEW OR REVISED POLICIES,PROCEDURES ,RULES,AND FORMS ;
(2) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MAY CONTRACTUALLY DELEGATEALLCOMPLIANCE WITHTHISARTICLE 29.5TOANOTHERLOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER .
(f) T HE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER TO PROVIDE OR REINSTATE SERVICES OR BENEFITS WRONGFULLY DENIED ;
NEITHER LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MAY IMPEDE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICL29.5,AND BOTH LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDERS MUST COOPERATE WITH ANY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICL29.5.
AND (g) A NY OTHER REMEDY NECESSARY , AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT , TO REMEDY VIOLATIONS OF THIS ARTICLE 29.5 AND PROSPECTIVELY ENSURE COMPLIANCE .
(3) THE DEPARTMENT MAY MONITOR A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SCOMPLIANCEWITHTHEDEPARTMENT SORDERFORUPTOONE YEAR AFTER THE FINDING OF A VIOLATION BY THE DEPARTMENT BY REQUIRING THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER TO IMPLEMENT A -33- 125 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN THAT WOULD REMEDY THE VIOLATION.
(2) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERMAYCONTRACTUALLYDELEGATE ALL COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE 29.5TO ANOTHER LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER .NEITHERLOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERMAYIMPEDECOMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE29.5,AND BOTH LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDERS MUST COOPERATE WITH ANY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
(4) (a) TE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY WITHHOLD STATE FUNDS FROM A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER IF THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DETERMINES THAT THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER HAS INTENTIONALLY VIOLATED THIS ARTICLE29.5AND DEMONSTRATED AN UNWILLINGNESSTOENTERINTOACORRECTIVEACTIONPLANTOADDRESS THE VIOLATION.PRIORTOINITIATINGTHE PROCESS TO WITHHOLD FUNDS, THE STATE BOARD MUST PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE LOCAL EDUCATIONPROVIDEROFTHEVIOLATIONSOFTHISARTICLE 29.5ANDTHE CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED.THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MUST BE GIVEN SIXTY DAYS TO RESPOND TO THE NOTI.A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MAY APPEAL A STATE BOARD DECISION TO WITHHOLD STATE FUNDSTOTHEOFFICEOFADMINISTRATIVECOURTS .THESTATEBOARDHAS THE BURDEN OF PROOF ,BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE ,TO ESTABLISH THE BASIS OF THE DECISION BEING APPEA.ED (b) NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 31, 2026THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SHALL ADOPT RULES THAT ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR THE WITHHOLDING OF FUNDS PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICL29.5.
(3) THE DEPARTMENT MAY MONITOR A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER S COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEPARTMENT S ORDER FOR UP TO ONE YEAR AFTER THE FINDING OF A VIOLATION BY THE DEPARTMENT BY PAGE 24-SENATE BILL 26-125 REQUIRINGTHELOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERTOIMPLEMENTACORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN THAT WOULD REMEDY THE VIOLATION .
(4) (a) THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY WITHHOLD STATE FUNDS FROM A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER IF THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DETERMINES THAT THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER HAS INTENTIONALLY VIOLATED THIS ARTICLE 29.5 AND DEMONSTRATED AN UNWILLINGNESS TO ENTER INTO A CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN TO ADDRESS THE VIOLATION.
PRIOR TO INITIATING THE PROCESS TO WITHHOLD FUND, THE STATE BOARD MUST PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER OF THE VIOLATIONS OF THIS ARTICLE29.5AND THE CORRECTIVEACTIONREQUIRED .THELOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERMUSTBE GIVEN SIXTY DAYS TO RESPOND TO THE NOTICE .
A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER MAY APPEAL A STATE BOARD DECISION TO WITHHOLD STATE FUNDS TO THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTSTHE STATE BOARD HAS THE BURDEN OF PROOF , BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE ,TO ESTABLISH THE BASIS OF THE DECISION BEING APPEALED (b) N O LATER THAN D ECEMBER 31, 2026THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SHALL ADOPT RULES THAT ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR THE WITHHOLDING OF FUNDS PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE 29.5.
(1) IAN INDIVIDUAL FILES A COMPLAINT WITH THE DEPARTMENT AND FILES A SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR COMPLAINT BASED ON THE SAME ALLEGED FACTS WITH THEU NITEDS TATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICEOFCIVILRIGHTSORTHE UNITED STATESDEPARTMENTOFJUSTICE , THE DEPARTMENT MAY :
(1) IF AN INDIVIDUAL FILES A COMPLAINT WITH THE DEPARTMENT AND FILES A SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR COMPLAINT BASED ON THE SAME ALLEGED FACTS WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS OR THENITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE DEPARTMENT MAY :
(a) DISMISS THE COMPLAINT IF THE INDIVIDUAL FILED THE COMPLAINT WITH THE U NITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS BEFORE FILING THE COMPLAINT WITH THE -34- 125 DEPARTMENT ;OR (b) NULLIFYREVOKE ,ORVOIDANYFINDINGSMADEORREMEDIES PRESCRIBED IF THE INDIVIDUAL FILED THE COMPLAINT WITH UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS AFTER THE RESOLUTION OF THE COMPLAINT WITH THE DEPARTMENT.
(a) D ISMISS THE COMPLAINT IF THE INDIVIDUAL FILED THE COMPLAINT WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OFEDUCATION OFFICE OFCIVILRIGHTSBEFOREFILINGTHECOMPLAINTWITHTHEDEPARTMENT ;OR (b) NULLIFY,REVOKE ,OR VOID ANY FINDINGS MADE OR REMEDIES PRESCRIBED IF THE INDIVIDUAL FILED THE COMPLAINT WITH THEUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS AFTER THE RESOLUTION OF THE COMPLAINT WITH THE DEPARTMENT .
(2) NOTHINGINTHISSECTIONSHALLBE CONSTRUEDTOLIMITTHE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS TO PURSUE CLAIMS UNDER FEDERAL LAW OR OTHER STATE LAW .
(2) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO LIMIT THE PAGE 25-SENATE BILL 26-125 RIGHTSOFINDIVIDUALSTOPURSUECLAIMSUNDERFEDERALLAWOROTHER STATE LAW .
(1) A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER SHALL NOT COERCE , INTIMIDATE,THREATEN ,OR DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ANY INDIVIDU:L (a) F OR THE PURPOSE OF INTERFERING WITH ANY RIGHT OR PRIVILEGE SECURED BY THIS ARTIC29.5,THE IDEA,SECTION 504,THE ADA, THE"EXCEPTIONAL C HILDRENS EDUCATIONAL A CT",ARTICLE20 OF THIS TITL22,OR THE "PROTECTION OFSTUDENTS FROM RESTRAINT AND SECLUSION A CT"ARTICLE 15.5OF THIS TITL22;
(1) ALOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDERSHALLNOTCOERCE ,INTIMIDATE, THREATEN ,OR DISCRIMINATE AGAINST ANY INDIVIDUAL:
(b) BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL MAKES OR HAS MADE,OR BECAUSE A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER BELIEVES AN INDIVIDUAL HAS MADE OR WILL MAKE ,A COMPLAINT UNDER THIS ARTICLE 29.5,THE IDEA, THE ADA, THE"EXCEPTIONAL C HILDRENS EDUCATIONAL A CT",ARTICLE20 OF THIS TITL22,OR THE "PROTECTION OFSTUDENTS FROM RESTRAINT AND SECLUSION A CT"ARTICLE 15.5OF THIS TITL22;OR (c) BCAUSEANINDIVIDUALTESTIFIES ,ASSIST,ORPARTICIPATES IN ANY MANNER IN AN INVESTIGATION OR PROCEEDING REGARDING AN ALLEGATIONORCOMPLAINTPURSUANTTOTHISARTICLE 29.5THE IDEA, THE ADA, THE "EXCEPTIONALC HILDRENSE DUCATIONAL ACT "ARTICLE 20 OFTHISTITLE22,ORTHE "PROTECTIONOF STUDENTSFROM RESTRAINT -35- 125 AND SECLUSION A CT"ARTICLE 15.5OF THIS TITL22.
(a) FRTHEPURPOSEOFINTERFERINGWITHANYRIGHTORPRIVILEGE SECURED BY THIS ARTICLE29.5,THE IDEA, SECTION 504, THEADA, THE "EXCEPTIONAL C HILDREN'SEDUCATIONAL ACT "ARTICLE 20OFTHISTITLE 22,OR THE "PROTECTION OF STUDENTS FROM RESTRAINT AND SECLUSION A CT",ARTICLE15.5 OF THIS TITL22;
(2) A LLEGATIONS OF COERCION ,INTIMIDATION, THREATS , DISCRIMINATION,OR OTHER RETALIATION AS DESCRIBEDINTHIS SECTION AGAINSTANYINDIVIDUALMAYBEFILEDWITHTHEDEPARTMENT ,ANDTHE DEPARTMENT SHALL PROCESS AND EVALUATE SUCH ALLEGATIONS PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE29.5.
(b) BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL MAKES OR HAS MADE ,OR BECAUSE A LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER BELIEVES AN INDIVIDUAL HAS MADE OR WILL MAKE ,A COMPLAINT UNDER THIS ARTICLE29.5,THE IDEA, THE ADA, THE "EXCEPTIONAL C HILDREN'SEDUCATIONAL ACT "ARTICLE 20OFTHISTITLE 22,OR THE "PROTECTION OF STUDENTS FROM RESTRAINT AND SECLUSION A CT",ARTICLE15.5 OF THIS TITL22;OR (c) BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL TESTIFIE,ASSISTS,OR PARTICIPATES IN ANY MANNER IN AN INVESTIGATION OR PROCEEDING REGARDING AN ALLEGATION OR COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE 29.5,THE IDEA, THE ADA, THE"E XCEPTIONAL CHILDREN S EDUCATIONAL ACT",ARTICLE OF THIS TITL22,OR THE"PROTECTION OF STUDENTS FROM RESTRAINT AND SECLUSION A CT",ARTICLE 15.5OF THIS TITL22.
(2) A LLEGATIONS OF COERCION , INTIMIDATION, THREATS , DISCRIMINATION,OR OTHER RETALIATION AS DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION AGAINST ANY INDIVIDUAL MAY BE FILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT,AND THE DEPARTMENTSHALLPROCESSANDEVALUATESUCHALLEGATIONSPURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE29.5.
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservationofthepublicpeace,health,orsafetyorforappropriationsfor the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate PAGE 26-SENATE BILL 26-125 preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
-36- 125
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 27-SENATE BILL 26-125
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the President of the Senate

  3. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass

  7. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  8. House Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

  9. House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Appropriations

  10. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  11. Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

  12. Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  13. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  14. Senate Committee on Education Refer Amended to Appropriations

  15. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Education

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 33 co-sponsors · 64 not signed on · 20 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (33)

Not signed on (64)

64 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 64 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

BILL

Passed 47 Yea · 18 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 41000
Republican 31600
Unaffiliated 3200
Total 471800
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (65)
Member Party Vote
Gonzalez R. — Nay
Stewart K. — Yea
Stewart R. — Yea
Winter T. — Yea
Garcia Sander — Nay
Alex Valdez Democrat Yea
Amy Paschal Democrat Yea
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Bob Marshall Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Yea
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Eliza Hamrick Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Emily Sirota Democrat Yea
Gretchen Rydin Democrat Yea
Jacque Phillips Democrat Yea
Jamie Jackson Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Yea
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Yea
Jenny Willford Democrat Yea
Julie McCluskie Democrat Yea
Junie Joseph Democrat Yea
Karen McCormick Democrat Yea
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Yea
Kyle Brown Democrat Yea
Lesley Smith Democrat Yea
Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat Yea
Lisa Feret Democrat Yea
Lorena Garcia Democrat Yea
Lori Goldstein Democrat Yea
Mandy Lindsay Democrat Yea
Manny Rutinel Democrat Yea
Matthew Martinez Democrat Yea
Meg Froelich Democrat Yea
Meghan Lukens Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Monica Duran Democrat Yea
Naquetta Ricks Democrat Yea
Regina English Democrat Yea
Sean Camacho Democrat Yea
Sheila Lieder Democrat Yea
Steven Woodrow Democrat Yea
Tammy Story Democrat Yea
Tisha Mauro Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Anthony Hartsook Republican Nay
Ava Flanell Republican Nay
Brandi Bradley Republican Nay
Carlos Barron Republican Nay
Chris Richardson Republican Nay
Dan Woog Republican Nay
Dusty Johnson Republican Nay
Jarvis Caldwell Republican Yea
Ken DeGraaf Republican Nay
Larry Don Suckla Republican Nay
Mary Bradfield Republican Nay
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Max Brooks Republican Nay
Rebecca Keltie Republican Nay
Rick Taggart Republican Yea
Ron Weinberg Republican Nay
Scott Bottoms Republican Nay
Scott Slaugh Republican Nay
Stephanie Luck Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 8000
Republican 1200
Total 9200
% of votes cast 82%18%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Emily Sirota Democrat Yea
Junie Joseph Democrat Yea
Kyle Brown Democrat Yea
Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Chris Richardson Republican Nay
Rick Taggart Republican Yea
Scott Bottoms Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 7000
Republican 1300
Total 8300
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Yea
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Yea
Lorena Garcia Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Nay
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Rebecca Keltie Republican Nay
Scott Slaugh Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 125 do?
The act prohibits a school district, a charter school authorized by a school district, a charter school authorized by the state charter school institute, the state charter school institute, or a board of cooperative services that operates one or more public schools (LEP) from discriminating against an individual who has a disability and who is entitled to a free public education (qualified student with a disability) based on the student's disability.     The act requires an LEP to allow a qualified student with a disability to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the provider's programs, services, or activities in the same manner as a student without a disability. When providing any aid, benefit, or service, an LEP shall not, based on disability:Deny a qualified student with a disability an opportunity to participate in or benefit from the aid, benefit, or service in a manner that is equal to that afforded to other students;Provide a qualified student with a disability with an aid, benefit, or service that is not as effective as that provided to other students;Provide different or separate aids, benefits, or services to a qualified student with a disability unless such action is necessary to provide a qualified student with a disability with aids, benefits, or services that are as effective as those provided to other students;Aid or perpetuate discrimination against a qualified student with a disability by providing significant assistance to an agency, an organization, or a person that discriminates on the basis of disability in providing any aid, benefit, or service to beneficiaries of the LEP's educational program or activity; orOtherwise limit a qualified student with a disability in the enjoyment of any right, privilege, advantage, or opportunity enjoyed by students without disabilities who receive an educational aid, benefit, or service.     The act prohibits an LEP from using criteria or methods of administration that:Have the effect of subjecting a qualified student with a disability to discrimination on the basis of their disability;Have the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the LEP's program or activity with respect to a qualified student with a disability; orPerpetuate the discrimination of another LEP if both LEPs are subject to common administrative control or are agencies of the state.     In determining the site or location of a facility, an LEP may not make selections that:Exclude a qualified student with a disability from a facility or deny a qualified student with a disability the benefits of a facility, or that otherwise subject a qualified student with a disability to discrimination; orHave the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially impairing the accomplishment of the objectives of the program or activity with respect to a qualified student with a disability.     The act requires an LEP to:Adopt a disability rights grievance process that incorporates appropriate due process standards and that is satisfied by following the grievance procedures in section 504 of the federal 'Rehabilitation Act of 1973' and to designate at least one responsible employee to oversee compliance with the provisions of the act relating to discrimination and to serve as a point of contact for students and families;Make a reasonable modification to a policy, practice, or procedure when the modification is necessary to avoid discriminating against a qualified student with a disability on the basis of disability;Provide a reasonable accommodation to a parent with a disability who is seeking appropriate access to programs and activities for parents in relation to that parent's child;Ensure that a communication to a qualified student with a disability is as effective as a communication to a student without a disability and to furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford a qualified student with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity of the LEP;Ensure that a qualified student with a disability is not denied access to the LEP's services, programs, or activities because of facilities inaccessible to a qualified student with a disability;Provide a free and appropriate public education to each qualified student with a disability who is in the LEP's jurisdiction, regardless of the nature or severity of the student's disability, and if necessary, ensure adequate transportation to and from any placement premises;Provide for the free and appropriate public education of each qualified student with a disability with students without disabilities to the maximum extent appropriate to the needs of the qualified student with a disability; Place a qualified student with a disability in the regular educational environment operated by the LEP unless it is demonstrated that the education of the student in that environment with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily;Provide nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities in such a manner as is necessary to afford a qualified student with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in the services and activities;At least annually, identify and locate every qualified student with a disability residing in the LEP's jurisdiction who is not receiving a free and appropriate public education and take appropriate steps, with the permission of the qualified student with a disability and their parent, to evaluate the student; Ensure that a qualified student with a disability is free from harassment that is sufficiently serious to create a hostile environment or interfere with or limit the student's ability to participate in or benefit from the LEP's services, activities, or opportunities; andConduct evaluations and reevaluations of a student in the student's primary language, communicate with a parent with limited English proficiency in a manner that provides meaningful access to information, and provide interpretation and translation services for communication with a parent with limited English proficiency.     Subject to sufficient funding or resources, certain provisions of the act take effect, which:Allow the department of education (department) to provide training and technical assistance to LEPs about the requirements of the act;Establish a complaint process and specifies that the department may investigate and resolve complaints of alleged violations of the provisions of the act pursuant to the complaint process;Specify the circumstances under which an individual may file a complaint with the department;Allow the department to order specified remedies as determined necessary by the department to remedy violations occurring pursuant to the act and to prospectively ensure compliance, if the department finds a violation; and Allow the state board of education (board) to withhold state funds from an LEP if the board determines that the LEP has intentionally violated the provisions of the act and demonstrated an unwillingness to enter into a corrective action plan to address the violation. No later than December 31, 2026, the board shall adopt rules that establish procedures for the withholding of funds. The board must provide due process to an LEP before state funds are withheld.     The act prohibits an LEP from coercing, intimidating, threatening, or discriminating against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by the act, the federal 'Individuals with Disabilities Education Act', the 'Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990', the 'Exceptional Children's Educational Act', or the 'Protection of Students from Restraint and Seclusion Act' (anti-discrimination laws) because an individual:Makes, has made, or because an LEP believes an individual has made or will make, a complaint pursuant to an anti-discrimination law; orTestifies, assists, or participates in any manner in an investigation or proceeding regarding an allegation or complaint pursuant to an anti-discrimination law.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors SB 125?
SB 125 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, Chris Kolker (Democrat), Janice Marchman (Democrat), Judy Amabile (Democrat), Matt Ball (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), Tony Exum (Democrat), Julie Gonzales (Democrat), Nick Hinrichsen (Democrat), William Lindstedt (Democrat), Kyle Mullica (Democrat), Dylan Roberts (Democrat), Robert Rodriguez (Democrat), Marc Snyder (Democrat), Tom Sullivan (Democrat), Mike Weissman (Democrat), Y. Zokaie, A. Valdez, M. Rutinel, K. Nguyen, B. Marshall, M. Lukens, M. Lindsay, S. Lieder, J. Jackson, L. Goldstein, R. English, M. Duran, C. Clifford, S. Camacho, A. Boesenecker, J. Phillips, J. Bacon, Iman Jodeh (Democrat), Jessie Danielson (Democrat), and Cathy Kipp (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 125?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 125?
Track SB 125 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 125

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 125

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →