SB 14 — Modification to Defense of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on April 20, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
14 sponsors
3 primary, 11 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Current law requires the defense to furnish a copy of any report of examination of the defendant that is made at the instance of the defense to the prosecution in a reasonable amount of time in advance of trial. The act requires a copy of the report to also be furnished to the court who, upon receipt of the copy, shall provide a copy to the department of human services. The act authorizes community placement of a defendant for treatment and rehabilitation. For a defendant who was charged with a crime allegedly committed on or after July 1, 2026, the act clarifies the legal standard for a defendant's conditional or unconditional release from the department. The standard for unconditional release is that the defendant has no abnormal mental condition that would be likely to cause the defendant to be dangerous to the defendant's self or others or to the community in the reasonably foreseeable future, is capable of distinguishing right from wrong, and has substantial capacity to conform their conduct to the law. The standard for conditional release is that the defendant can satisfy the standard for unconditional release but with the imposition of and compliance with conditions. At an unconditional release hearing for a defendant who is on conditional release, if any evidence is introduced that shows the defendant is ineligible for unconditional release, the defendant has the burden of proving that the defendant meets the applicable test for unconditional release.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
189 added · 228 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill SB 14 has been updated to clarify the procedures for providing examination reports for defendants claiming a not guilty by reason of insanity defense. Specifically, the new language states that the defense must provide any examination report to both the court and the prosecution in a reasonable time before the trial. This change is significant because it ensures that all parties are informed and can prepare appropriately, helping to promote fairness in legal proceedings.
SecondNOTE: Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
26-0122.01This Owenbill Hatchhas x2698been SENATEprepared BILLfor 26-014the SENATEsignatures SPONSORSHIPof Amabile,the Coleman,appropriate Cutter,legislative Gonzalesofficers J., Kipp, Snyder, Wallace HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Rydin and Soper,the Bacon,Governor. Clifford, Hamrick, Jackson, McCluskie d d e a 2 S n 2 U g 2 H d r e A Senate Committees House Committees R Judiciary Judiciary 3 n 6 A BILL FOR AN ACT d 0 S e 2, C ONCERNING MODIFICATIONS TO THE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE OF NOT U R 3 H n c GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY .
dTo adetermine dwhether Mthe nGovernor Billhas Summarysigned mthe Abill (Note:or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
ThisSENATE summaryBILL applies26-014 toBY thisSENATOR(S) billAmabile, asCutter, introducedGonzales andJ., doesKipp, notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.IfthisbillSnyder, eWallace, nColeman; 2 passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that m 2 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at T n 0 A U 1 http://leg.colorado.gov/.) E i a S a r R e Legislative Oversight Committee Concerning the Treatment r F of Persons with Behavioral Health Disorders in the Criminal and 3 Juvenile Justice Systems.
Currentalso lawREPRESENTATIVE(S) requiresRydin theand defenseSoper, toBacon, furnishClifford, aHamrick, copyJackson, ofMcCluskie. any report of examination of the defendant that is made at the n instanceof the defense to the prosecution in a reasonable amount of time d 6 in advance of trial.
TheC billONCERNINGMODIFICATIONSTOTHEAFFIRMATIVEDEFENSEOFNOTGUILTY requiresBY aREASON copyOF ofINSANITY the. report to also be e 0 T R , A n y E d a Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
S e r Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n e Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
m F A furnishedtothecourtwho,uponreceiptof thecopy,shall provideacopy to the department of human services.
The bill authorizes community placement of a defendant for treatment and rehabilitation.
Thebillclarifiesthelegalstandardforadefendant'sconditionalor unconditional release from the department.
The bill makes technical corrections.
SECTION1.SECTION 1.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,16-8-108,amend(2)In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-108, amend (2) as follows:
(2) A copyofcopy anyreportof any report of examination of the defendant made at theinstanceofthedefenseshallMUSTthe befurnishedtoTHECOURTANDinstance of the prosecutionINareasonabletimeinadvanceoftrial.Udefense PONRECEIPTOFTHEshallUST REPORTbe OFfurnished EXAMINATIONto ,THETHE COURT SHALLAND PROVIDEthe Aprosecution COPYIN OFa THEreasonable REPORTtime TOin THEadvance DEPARTMENTof OFtrial. HUMAN SERVICES .
PON RECEIPT OF THE REPORT OF EXAMINATION , THE COURT SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF THE REPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES .
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-115, amend (1)(a)(I)________ andCapital addletters (1)(b.5)or asbold follows:& italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
(1)(a)(I) and add (1)(b.5) as follows:
ReleasefromcommitmentafterverdictofnotguiltyRelease from commitment after verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity or not guilty by reason of impaired mental condition - definitions.
(1) (a) (I) Upon an initial commitment following a finding of not guiltybyreasonofinsanitypursuanttosection16-8-105.5(4)(b),oruponguilty by reason of insanity pursuant to section 16-8-105.5 (4)(b), or upon delaying final entry of the finding of not guilty by reason of insanity pursuantpursuanttosection16-8.5-105.5(4)(a) toSECTION section16-8-105.5(4)(a),thecourt 16-8.5-105.5 (4)(a)TION 16-8-105.5 (4)(a), the court shall schedule an initial release hearing no later than one hundred twenty days after the initial commitment.
The court shall order the departmentofdepartment of human services to completeareleaseexaminationnolatercomplete a release examination no later than thirtythirtydays priortotheinitialreleasehearing.Thedefendantmayrequestanadditional release examination by a medical expert in mental health disorders of the defendant'schoosingpursuanttosection16-8-108.Thecourtmaycontinue the hearing beyond one hundred and twenty days priorupon a finding of good cause or if necessary to theconduct initiala releasesecond hearing.evaluation of the defendant.
The(b.5) defendantATANYUNCONDITIONALRELEASEHEARINGFORADEFENDANT mayWHO -2-IS 014ON requestANY anCONDITIONAL additionalRELEASE release,IF examinationANY byEVIDENCE aIS medicalINTRODUCED expertTHAT inSHOWSTHE mentalDEFENDANT healthdisordersofthedefendant'schoosingpursuanttosection16-8-108.ISINELIGIBLEFORUNCONDITIONALRELEASE , THEDEFENDANTHASTHEBURDENOFPROVINGBYAPREPONDERANCEOFTHE EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFENDANT MEETS THE APPLICABLE TEST FOR UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8-120.
ThecourtmaycontinuethehearingbeyondonehundredandtwentydaysF uponTHE aCOURT findingFINDSTHEDEFENDANTELIGIBLEFORUNCONDITIONALRELEASE of,THECOURT goodSHALL causeORDER orTHE ifUNCONDITIONAL necessaryRELEASE toOF conductTHE aDEFENDANT second. evaluation of the defendant.
(b.5)F ATTHE ANYCOURT UNCONDITIONALFINDS RELEASETHE HEARINGDEFENDANT INELIGIBLE FOR AUNCONDITIONAL DEFENDANTRELEASE WHO, ISTHE ONCOURT ANYSHALL ORDER CONTINUED CONDITIONAL RELEASE,IFRELEASE ANYAND EVIDENCEMAY ISIMPOSE INTRODUCEDOR THATMODIFY SHOWSSUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS THE DEFENDANTCOURT ISDETERMINES INELIGIBLEARE FORIN UNCONDITIONALRELEASETHE THEDEFENDANTHASTHEBURDENOFPROVINGBEST BYAPREPONDERANCEOFTHEEVIDENCETHATTHEDEFENDANTMEETSTHEINTEREST APPLICABLEOF TESTTHE FORDEFENDANT UNCONDITIONALAND RELEASETHE PURSUANTCOMMUNITY TOAND SECTIONSHALL 16-8-120.NOTIFY THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE ORDER .
IF THE COURT FINDS THE DEFENDANT ELIGIBLE FOR UNCONDITIONALRELEASE THECOURTSHALLORDERTHEUNCONDITIONAL RELEASE OF THE DEFENDANT .
F THE COURT FINDS THE DEFENDANT INELIGIBLE FOR UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE, THE COURT SHALL ORDER CONTINUED CONDITIONAL RELEASE AND MAY IMPOSE OR MODIFY SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS THE COURT DETERMINES ARE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE DEFENDANT AND THE COMMUNITY AND SHALL NOTIFY THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE ORDE.
WhenWhenadeterminationistobe amadeastoadefendant'seligibilityfor determinationCONDITIONAL is to be as to a defendant's eligibility forCONDITIONAL OR UNCONDITIONAL release, the court shall explain to the PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-014 defendant the nature and consequences of the proceeding and the rights of the defendant pursuant to this section, including the defendant's right to a jury trial upon the question of eligibility forORfor -3-CONDITIONAL 014OR UNCONDITIONAL release.Thedefendantifthedefendantwishestocontestrelease. the question,ay request a hearing that must be granted as a matter of right.
AtThe thedefendant hearing,if the defendant andwishes the prosecuting attorney are entitledtobepresentinperson,toexamineanyreportsof examinationor other matter to becontest consideredthequestion,mayrequestahearingthatmustbegrantedasamatterofright. by the court as bearing upon the determination, tointroduceevidence,summonwitnesses,cross-examine witnessesfortheothersideorthecourt,andtomakeopeningandclosing statements and argument.
TheAtthehearing,thedefendantandtheprosecutingattorneyareentitledtobe courtpresent mayin person, to examine anyreports of examination or cross-examineother anymatter witnesscalledbythedefendantorprosecutingattorneyandmaysummonto be considered by the court as bearing upon the determination, to introduce evidence,summonwitnesses,cross-examinewitnessesfortheothersideor the court, and examineto witnessesmake onopening itsand ownclosing motion.statements and argument.
SECTION4.The courtmayexamineorcross-examineanywitnesscalledbythedefendantor prosecuting attorney and may summon and examine witnesses on its own motion.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,16-8-118,amend(1)SECTION introductory4. portion, (1)(a), (2)(a) introductory portion, (2)(a.5), (2)(b), (2)(c), and (2)(d)(I) as follows:
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-118, amend (1) introductory portion, (1)(a), (2)(a) introductory portion, (2)(a.5), (2)(b), (2)(c), and (2)(d)(I) as follows:
(1) ThechiefofficeroftheinstitutionwhereadefendanthasbeenThe committedchief underPURSUANTofficer TOof thisthe articleinstitution 8where ora articledefendant 8.5has ofbeen thiscommittedunder titlePURSUANTTO 16,thisarticle8orarticle8.5of orthechiefofficer'sdesignee,mayauthorizetreatmentandrehabilitationthis activitiestitle16,or involvingMMUNITYthe PLACEMENTchief OFofficer's THEdesignee, DEFENDANTmay ORauthorize temporarytreatment physicaland removalrehabilitation ofactivities theinvolving defendantCOMMUNITY fromPLACEMENT theOF institutionTHE whereDEFENDANT theOR temporaryphysicalremovalofthedefendantfromtheinstitutionwherethe defendant has been placed, if prior to the authorization the following procedures are carried out:
(a) The chief officer, or the chief officer's designee, shall give written notice by certified mail, with return receipt requested, to the committing court and the district attorneythatattorney that on or after thirty-five days fromthedateoffrom mailingthenotice,thechiefthe officer,orthechiefdate of mailing the notice, the chief officer, or the chief officer's designee, will authorize treatment and rehabilitation activities involving -4- 014 COMMUNITY PLACEMENT OF THE DEFENDANT OR temporary physical removalremovalofthedefendantfromtheinstitution,unless ofTHECHIEFOFFICER the defendant from the institution, unlessIEF OFFICE, OR THE CHIEF OFFICERSOFFICER S DESIGNEE ,RECEIVES, RECEIVES written objections to the authorization are received by the chief officer, or the chief officer's designee,withindesignee,withinthirty-fivedaysfrom thirty-fiveAFTER daysthedateof froAFTERmailingthenotice. the date of mailing the notice.
(2)(a)PAGE AcourtshallorderanyA3-SENATE defendantwhoreceivestreatmentBILL 26-014 (2) (a) A court shall order anA defendant who receives treatment and rehabilitation activities invoCOMMUNITYinvolvingCOMMUNITY PLACEMENT OF THE DEFENDANT OR temporary physical removal of the defendant from the institution to register with the local law enforcement agency of the jurisdiction in whichEREwhichWHERE the defendant resides if the court finds that:
(a.5) Acourtmayorderany A courtdefendantwhoreceivestreatmentand may order anA defendant who receives treatment and rehabilitation activities involvingNITYinvolving COMMUNITY PLACEMENT OF THE DEFENDANT OR temporary physical removal of the defendant from the institution to register with the local law enforcement agency of the jurisdiction where the defendant resides if the court finds that the chief officer of the institution where the defendant has been committed, or the chief officer's designee, recommends registration based on information obtainedfromthedefendantduringthecourseofobtained treatmentthatindicatesfrom the defendant during the course of treatment that indicates the defendant has committed an offense involving unlawful sexual behavior.
(b) PriorPriortoCOMMUNITYPLACEMENTOR totemporaryphysicalremoval COMMUNITYfromthe PLACEMENT OR temporary physical removal from the institution of any defendant who is required to registerpursuanttothissubsection(2),thedepartmentofhumanservicesregister pursuant to this subsection (2), the department of human services shall obtain from the defendant the address where the defendant plans to reside and the departmentdepartmentshallnotifythelocallawenforcementagencyofthejurisdiction shall notify the local law enforcement agency of the jurisdiction where the defendant plans to reside and the Colorado -5- 014 bureau of investigation as provided in section 16-8-115 (4)(c).
(c) Any AAdefendantrequiredto defendant required to register pursuant to this subsection(2)shallregisterasprovidedinsection16-8-115(4).Thelocalsubsection lawenforcementagencyshalltransmitanyregistrationsreceivedpursuant(2) tothissubsection(2)totheColoradobureauofinvestigationwithinthreeshall businessregister daysas followingprovided AFTERin receipt.section 16-8-115 (4).
The Coloradolocal bureaulaw ofenforcement investigationshallincludeanyregistrationinformationreceivedpursuantagency to this section in the central registry established pursuant to section 16-22-110 and shall specifytransmit thatany theregistrations informationreceived applies to a defendant required to register as a condition ofMMUNITY PLACEMENT OR temporaryphysicalremovalfromaninstitution.Theformscompletedby defendantsA DEFENDANT required to register pursuant to this subsection (2) shall beE confidential and shall nARE NOT open to inspectionthe exceptColorado asbureau otherwiseof providedinvestigation inwithin sectionthree 16-8-115business (3)(e)days forfollowing informationAFTER pertainingreceipt. to persons granted conditional release and except as provided forreleaseofinformationtothepublicpursuanttosections16-22-110(6) and 16-22-112.
Show all 53 changed lines (13 more)
(d)The (I)Colorado Anybureau Aof defendantinvestigation requiredshall toinclude registerany registration information received pursuant to this subsectionsection (2),in uponthe completioncentral ofregistry aestablished periodpursuant ofto notsection less16-22-110 thanand twentyyearsshall fromspecify AFTERthat the dateinformation theapplies defendantto beginsa receivingdefendant treatmentrequiredtoregisterasaconditionof andCOMMUNITYPLACEMENTOR rehabilitation activities involvingMUNITY PLACEMENT OF THE DEFENDANT OR temporary physical removal of the defendant from the institution, may petition the district court for an orderinstitution. that discontinues the requirement for suchgistration and removes the defendant's name from the central registry established pursuant to section 16-22-110.
The courtforms mayissuecompleted suchNby orderonlyifdefendants theA courtDEFENDANT makesrequired writtento findingsregister ofpursuant factthatthedefendanthasneitherbeenconvictednorfoundnotguiltybyto -6-this 014subsection reason(2) ofshall insanitybe ofARE anconfidential offenseand involvingshall unlawfulnot sexualbeARE behaviorNOT subsequentopen to suchEinspection COMMUNITYexcept PLACEMENTas ORotherwiseprovidedinsection16-8-115(3)(e)forinformationpertainingto temporarypersons removalgranted andconditional thatrelease theand defendantexcept wouldas notprovided posefor anrelease undueof threatinformationtothepublicpursuanttosections16-22-110(6)and16-22-112. to the community if allowed to live in the community without registration.
SECTION5.PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-014 (d) (I) Any A defendant required to register pursuant to this subsection (2), upon completion of a period of not less than twenty years from AFTER the date the defendant begins receiving treatment and rehabilitation activities involvingOMMUNITY PLACEMENT OF THE DEFENDANT OR temporary physical removal of the defendant from the institution, maypetition the district court for an order that discontinues the requirement for suchegistration and removes the defendant's name from the central registry established pursuant to section 16-22-110.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,16-8-120,add(5)asThe follows:court mayissuesuch AN orderonlyifthecourtmakeswrittenfindingsoffactthat the defendant has neither been convicted nor found not guiltybyreason of insanity of an offense involving unlawful sexual behavior subsequent to such THE COMMUNITY PLACEMENT OR temporary removal and that the defendant would not pose an undue threat to the community if allowed to live in the community without registration.
SECTION 5.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 16-8-120, add (5) as follows:
(a) TTHE HE STANDARD FOR UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE FROM COMMITMENTISCOMMITMENT :THEDEFENDANTHASNOABNORMALMENTALCONDITIONIS THATWOULDBELIKELYTOCAUSETHEDEFENDANTTOBEDANGEROUSTO:T HE DEFENDANT HAS NO ABNORMAL MENTAL CONDITION THAT WOULD BE LIKELY TO CAUSE THE DEFENDANT TO BE DANGEROUS TO THE DEFENDANT 'S SELF OR OTHERS OR TO THE COMMUNITY IN THE REASONABLYFORESEEABLEFUTUREREASONABLY ,ANDTHEDEFENDANTISCAPABLEOFFORESEEABLE DISTINGUISHINGRIGHTFROMWRONGANDHASSUBSTANTIALCAPACITYTOFUTURE ,AND THE DEFENDANT IS CAPABLE OF DISTINGUISHING RIGHT FROM WRONG AND HAS SUBSTANTIAL CAPACITY TO CONFORM THE DEFENDANT S CONDUCT TO REQUIREMENTS OF LAW.LAW .
(b) THETHESTANDARDFORCONDITIONALRELEASEFROMCOMMITMENT STANDARDIS: FOR CONDITIONAL RELEASE FROM COMMITMENT IS :
WITHOUT THE IMPOSITION OF AND COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS,THECONDITIONS ,THE DEFENDANT IS INELIGIBLE FOR RELEABUTRELEASE,BUT WITH THE IMPOSITIONOFIMPOSITION ANDCOMPLIANCEWITHCONDITIONSOF ,THEDEFENDANTHASAND NOABNORMALMENTALCONDITIONTHATWOULDBELIKELYTOCAUSETHECOMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS , THE DEFENDANT HAS NO ABNORMAL MENTAL CONDITION THAT WOULD BE LIKELY TO CAUSE THE DEFENDANT TO BE DANGEROUS TO THE DEFENDANT'SDEFENDANT SELFOR'S SELF OR OTHERS OR TOTHECOMMUNITYINTHEREASONABLYFORESEEABLEFUTURETO ,ANDTHETHE DEFENDANTISCAPABLEOFDISTINGUISHINGRIGHTFROMWRONGANDHASCOMMUNITY SUBSTANTIALCAPACITYTOCONFORMTHEDEFENDANTIN SCONDUCTTOTHETHE REASONABLY FORESEEABLE FUTURE , AND THE DEFENDANT IS CAPABLE OF DISTINGUISHING RIGHT FROM WRONG AND HAS SUBSTANTIAL CAPACITY TO CONFORM THE DEFENDANT S CONDUCT TO THE PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 26-014 REQUIREMENTS OF LAW .
The general assembly finds, -7- 014 determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservationofthepublicpeace,health,orsafetyorforappropriationsforpreservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
-8-____________________________ 014____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 26-014
Show all 53 changed rows (13 more)
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Floor
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
Sponsors
- J. McCluskie · Cosponsor
- J. Jackson · Cosponsor
- E. Hamrick · Cosponsor
- Judy Amabile · Primary
- James Coleman · Cosponsor
- Lisa Cutter · Cosponsor
- Julie Gonzales · Cosponsor
- C. Clifford · Cosponsor
- J. Bacon · Cosponsor
- Cathy Kipp · Cosponsor
- Marc Snyder · Cosponsor
- Katie Wallace · Cosponsor
- M. Soper · Primary
- G. Rydin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 87 not signed on · 14 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- Judy Amabile Democrat
- M. Soper
- G. Rydin
Co-sponsors (11)
- J. McCluskie
- J. Jackson
- E. Hamrick
- James Coleman Democrat
- Lisa Cutter Democrat
- Julie Gonzales Democrat
- C. Clifford
- J. Bacon
- Cathy Kipp Democrat
- Marc Snyder Democrat
- Katie Wallace Democrat
Not signed on (87)
87 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 87 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 18 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 12 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 33% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Michaelson Jenet | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 14 do?
- Current law requires the defense to furnish a copy of any report of examination of the defendant that is made at the instance of the defense to the prosecution in a reasonable amount of time in advance of trial. The act requires a copy of the report to also be furnished to the court who, upon receipt of the copy, shall provide a copy to the department of human services. The act authorizes community placement of a defendant for treatment and rehabilitation. For a defendant who was charged with a crime allegedly committed on or after July 1, 2026, the act clarifies the legal standard for a defendant's conditional or unconditional release from the department. The standard for unconditional release is that the defendant has no abnormal mental condition that would be likely to cause the defendant to be dangerous to the defendant's self or others or to the community in the reasonably foreseeable future, is capable of distinguishing right from wrong, and has substantial capacity to conform their conduct to the law. The standard for conditional release is that the defendant can satisfy the standard for unconditional release but with the imposition of and compliance with conditions. At an unconditional release hearing for a defendant who is on conditional release, if any evidence is introduced that shows the defendant is ineligible for unconditional release, the defendant has the burden of proving that the defendant meets the applicable test for unconditional release.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 14?
- SB 14 is sponsored by J. McCluskie, J. Jackson, E. Hamrick, Judy Amabile (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), Julie Gonzales (Democrat), C. Clifford, J. Bacon, Cathy Kipp (Democrat), Marc Snyder (Democrat), Katie Wallace (Democrat), M. Soper, and G. Rydin.
- What is the current status of SB 14?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 14?
- Track SB 14 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 14
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 14
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →