HB 1139 — Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on June 02, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
18 sponsors
4 primary, 14 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill regulates the use of AI in healthcare utilization reviews starting in 2027.
Beginning in 2027, healthcare entities using AI for service coverage reviews must adhere to specific criteria ensuring human oversight and individual data consideration. The bill also prohibits payment for AI-conducted psychotherapy services.
What this means for you
- Workers: Workers may experience more equitable healthcare coverage decisions as AI systems incorporate individual circumstances.
- Families: Families may benefit from improved healthcare decision-making processes that factor in personal medical histories.
- Healthcare: Healthcare entities must ensure AI systems are compliant with standards for individual patient care.
Summary
On and after January 1, 2027, when determining coverage for health-care services, the act requires entities that use an artificial intelligence system (AI system) for the purpose of conducting utilization review of health-care services, including health insurance companies (carriers), pharmacy benefit managers, private utilization review organizations, behavioral health administrative services organizations, and managed care entities (entities), ensure that the AI system complies with certain requirements specified in the act. Specifically, an entity shall ensure that the AI system:Makes determinations based on medical or clinical history, the patient's individual clinical circumstances, and other relevant clinical factors specified in the act, with denial of coverage reviewed by a licensed clinician or physician or other competent regulated professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues and review the health benefit plan's terms of coverage (competent regulated professional);Does not base its determination solely on group data without reference to the individual's data;Is not used in any way that discriminates against individuals in violation of other state or federal laws and is fairly and equitably applied, including in accordance with regulations and guidance issued by the federal department of health and human services; andIs periodically reviewed to ensure the AI systems outcomes are accurate and reliable and that an individual's health data is not used beyond its intended or stated purpose. Entities that use AI systems shall disclose to the division of insurance, the department of human services, or the department of health care policy and financing, as applicable, the utilization review functions for which the AI system will be used and the points in the utilization review process when it will be used, the process for human oversight of adverse coverage determinations, and the process for maintaining audit information to ensure that the use of the AI system complies with the requirements in the act. The AI system may be used to assist in utilization review, including expedited approvals. A carrier's denial of coverage for a service based in whole or in part on medical necessity shall not be issued solely on the output of an AI system without human review by a licensed clinician or physician or other competent regulated professional. Further, the act prohibits a carrier and a payer of services under the 'Colorado Medical Assistance Act' and the 'Children's Basic Health Plan Act' from paying for psychotherapy services that are provided directly to a client and that are conducted by an AI system.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
204 added · 320 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to House Bill 1139 includes a new note stating that the bill is prepared for signatures from legislative officers and the Governor, allowing people to check the current status of the bill. This change is important because it provides transparency and keeps the public informed about whether the bill has been approved into law or not. The bill itself focuses on the role of artificial intelligence in healthcare, emphasizing the need for compassionate, human-centered decision-making in medical contexts.
SecondNOTE: Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
26-0038.01This Britabill Darlinghas x2241been HOUSEprepared BILLfor 26-1139the HOUSEsignatures SPONSORSHIPof Josephthe andappropriate Lieder,legislative Duran,officers Froelich, Lindsay, Nguyen, Story, Titone SENATE SPONSORSHIP Cutter and Daugherty,the Amabile,Governor. Coleman, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Marchman, Mullica e n e 6 E a 0 A U , N g 1 S d a House Committees Senate Committees e M Health & Human Services Business, Labor, & Technology R r e A BILL FOR AN ACT n m 2 C ONCERNINGTHEUSEOFARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCEINHEALTHCARE .
TTo ndetermine 2whether Nthe UGovernor 8has Esigned ithe abill Billor Summarytaken Sother aaction Mon Rit, nplease (Note:consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
ThisHOUSE summaryBILL applies26-1139 toBY thisREPRESENTATIVE(S) billJoseph as introduced and doesLieder, 2Duran, notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.IfthisbillFroelich,Lindsay, passesNguyen, thirdStory, readingTitone; in the house of introduction, a bill summary that e applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at n 6 http://leg.colorado.gov.) m 0 E n , U U 1 Section 2 of the bill requires entities that use an artificial O i h H a r intelligence system or algorithm (AI system) for the purpose of R M r conducting utilization review of health-care services, including health 3 insurancecarriers,pharmacybenefitmanagers,privateutilizationreview organizations, behavioral health administrative services organizations, and managed care entities, to ensure that the AI system complies with g d 62 certain requirements specified in the bill when determining coverage for E e 2 services.
Specifically,also theSENATOR(S) AICutter systemand usedDaugherty, must:Amabile, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Marchman, Mullica, Coleman.
SC RONCERNING 3THE UUSE dOF 1ARTIFICIAL HINTELLIGENCE 2IN rHEALTH ShadingCARE denotes. HOUSE amendment.
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
e a Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n M Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
e A ! Not base its determination solely on group data;
and ! Make determinations based on medical or clinical history, the patient's individual clinical circumstances, and other relevant factors specified in the bill, with denial of coverage reviewed by a licensed clinician or physician.
The AI system may be used to assist in utilization review, includingexpeditedapprovals.Adenialordelayofcoverageforaservice based in whole or in part on medical necessity must be reviewed by a licensed clinician or physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues.
Section3definesa"mentalhealthcompanionchatbot",inpart,as an AI system that:
! Uses generative artificial intelligence to provide adaptive, personalized,andemotionallyresonantresponsestosustain a one-on-one relationship with a user;
! Engages in interactive conversations similar to those an individual would have with a licensed mental health professional;
and ! Is represented by the AI systems provider as, or that a reasonable person believes to be, capable of providing mental health therapy or of helping to manage or treat mental health conditions.
Sections 2, 5, 6, and 7:
! Declare that an AI systems provider engages in the unauthorized practice of psychotherapy if the AI system used:
! Represents, states, or indicates, explicitly or implicitly, that the AI system is a human mental health provider or is authorized to engage in the practice of psychotherapy;
! Usesprohibitedtitles,abbreviationsordescriptions of professions, credentials, or services that only a mental health professional authorized to provide psychotherapy in the state (regulated professional) may use;
! Delivers psychotherapy services that would be considered the practice of psychotherapy without oversight by an individual who is a regulated professional;
or ! Is a mental health companion chatbot and:
Fails to provideclearandconspicuousnoticetotheuserthat the AI system is not a human and is not authorized toprovidepsychotherapy,therapy, or counseling or to manage or treat mental health conditions;
fails to disclose that the AI system is artificial intelligence -2- 1139 whenasked;failstoimplementaprotocoltoaddress suicidal ideation or self-harm expressed by users, including referring users to a suicide hotline or crisis text line;
or sells, shares, or discloses identifiablementalhealthdataorconditionstheuse of the mental health companion chatbot on a user agreeing to those practices;
! Allow for the use of an AI system to provide general information, support, or education, without representing that the AI system is a regulated professional;
! Exempt from the bill the development, testing, or evaluation of an AI system conducted for the purpose of research by an institutional review board;
and ! Prohibit a regulated professional from billing a public or private payer for psychotherapy services that are provided directly to a client and that are conducted by an AI system or for supervision of candidates or professional consultations that are provided by an AI system without human oversight.
Section 4 requires a regulated professional to disclose to a client the purposes for which the regulated professional uses AI systems or therapeuticordiagnosticdevicesthatincludeAIsystemsintheirpractice and when those AI systems or devices are used, the right of a client to consent to a disclosure of confidential communications, and other disclosures.
Sections2and7prohibitahealthinsurancecarrierandapayerof servicesunderthe"ColoradoMedicalAssistanceAct"andthe"Children's Basic Health Plan Act" from paying for psychotherapy services that are provided directly to a client and that are conducted by an AI system.
SECTION1.SECTION 1.
Legislativedeclaration.(1)Legislative Thegeneralassemblydeclaration. finds and declares that:
(1) The general assembly finds and declares that:
-3- 1139 (b) Artificial intelligence systems may offer valuable tools to supportsupportefficiency,dataanalysis,andadministrativefunctionsinhealth-care efficiency,delivery; data analysis, and administrative functions in health-caredelivery;however,thesesystemscannotcomprehendthefull breadth and depth of the human experience, including trauma, culture, disability,grief,fear,hope,andthelivedrealitiesthatshapepatienthealth outcomes;
(c)however, Thethese statesystems ofcannot Coloradocomprehend hasthe afull compellingbreadth interest in ensuring that health care remains human-centered and thatdepth decisionsof involvingthe coveragehuman determinations,experience, medicalincluding necessity,trauma, andculture, accessdisability, togrief, treatment,Capital particularlyletters denials of care, are made by qualified human clinicians or physiciansbold who& areitalic accountablenumbers forindicate thesenew decisionsmaterial andadded canto exerciseexisting professionallaw; judgment and ethical reasoning;
(d)dashes Reliancethrough onwords artificial intelligence systems to make or materiallynumbers influenceindicate adversedeletions health-carefrom determinationsexisting withoutlaw meaningful human oversight risks compounding inequities, embedding bias, and erodingsuch trustmaterial betweenis patients,not providers,part andof health-carethe systems;act.
(e)fear, Artificialintelligencesystemsmaybeusedasanassistivetoolhope, in health-care delivery and administration but must not replace human judgment, human accountability, or the therapeuticlived relationshiprealities that isshape essentialpatient tohealth safe,outcomes; ethical, and effective care;
and(c) (f)The Everystate Coloradan,of regardlessColorado ofhas income,a insurancecompelling status,interest disability,in languageensuring accessthat needs,health race,care ethnicity,remains geography,human-centered orand immigrationthat status,decisions deservesinvolving coverage determinations, medical necessity, and access to human-centeredtreatment, healthparticularly caredenials thatof recognizescare, theirare dignity,made individuality,by qualified human clinicians or physicians who areaccountableforthesedecisionsandcanexerciseprofessionaljudgment and humanity.ethical reasoning;
(2)(d) Therefore,thegeneralassemblydeclaresthatitisessentialto:Reliance on artificialintelligencesystems to make or materially influence adverse health-care determinations without meaningful human oversight risks compounding inequities, embedding bias, and eroding trust between patients, providers, and health-care systems;
(a)(e) RegulatetheuseofartificialintelligencesystemsinhealthcareArtificial -4-intelligence 1139systems tomay ensurebe transparency,used as an assistive tool in health-care delivery and administration but must not replace human judgment, human accountability, equity,or the therapeutic relationship that is essential to safe, ethical, and patienteffective safety;care;
and (f) Every Coloradan, regardless of income, insurance status, disability,languageaccessneeds,race,ethnicity,geography,orimmigration status, deserves access to human-centered health care that recognizes their dignity, individuality, and humanity.
Show all 80 changed lines (40 more)
(2) Therefore, the general assembly declares that it is essential to:
(a) Regulate the use of artificial intelligence systems in health care to ensure transparency, accountability, equity, and patient safety;
and (c) PreservethecentralroleoflicensedcliniciansindecisionsthatPreserve the central role of licensed clinicians in decisions that affect the health, well-being, and lives of Coloradans.
Use of artificial intelligence systems - utilization review - prohibition on payment for AI-delivered psychotherapy PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 26-1139 services - definitions.
(1) AAS S USED IN THIS SECTI:NSECTIO: (a) "A RTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTE"HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION6-1-1701 (2).
(b)(a) "BEHAVIORAL"A HEALTHRTIFICIAL ADMINISTRATIVEINTELLIGENCE SERVICESSYSTEM ORGANIZATION"HAS "MEANSANORGANIZATIONSELECTEDBYTHEBEHAVIORALTHE HEALTHADMINISTRATIONPURSUANTTOSECTIONMEANING 27-50-402SET TOESTABLISHFORTH ANDIN MAINTAINSECTION6-1-1701 A(2). NETWORK OF BEHAVIORAL HEATH PROVIDERS .
(c)(b) "M"BEHAVIORAL ANAGEDHEALTH CAREADMINISTRATIVE ENTITYSERVICES ORGANIZATION " HASMEANS AN ORGANIZATION SELECTED BY THE MEANINGBEHAVIORAL SETHEALTH FORTHADMINISTRATION INPURSUANT TO SECTION 25.5-5-40327-50-402TO (4).ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A NETWORK OF BEHAVIORAL HEATH PROVIDERS .
(d)(c) "PRIVATE"M UTILIZATIONANAGED REVIEWCARE ORGANIZATIONENTITY ""HAS ORTHE "ORGANIZATIONMEANING "MEANSAPRIVATEUTILIZATIONREVIEWORGANIZATIONSET ,FORTH ASDEFINEDINSECTIONIN 10-16-112(1)(a)THATHASACONTRACTWITHORSECTION PERFORMS25.5-5-403 PRIOR(4). AUTHORIZATION ON BEHALF OF A CARRIER .
(d) "P RIVATE UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATION " OR "ORGANIZATION "MEANSAPRIVATEUTILIZATIONREVIEWORGANIZATION ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 10-16-112 (1)(a),THAT HAS A CONTRACT WITH OR PERFORMS PRIOR AUTHORIZATION ON BEHALF OF A CARRIER .
SSECTIONSSUBSECTIONS (3), (4AND(4)AND (5)(5)OF OF THIS SECTION APPLY TO:
(a) A CARRIER THAT:THAT :
(I) U SES AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM FOR THE -5- 1139 PURPOSE OF UTILIZATION REVIEW;OR (II) CONTRACTSWITHOROTHERWISE WORKSTHROUGHAPERSON THAT USES ANANARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEMFORTHEPURPOSE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM FOR THE PURPOSE OF UTILIZATION REVIEWREVIEW; ;
(b) A PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGER OR PRIVATE(II) UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATION THAT CONTRACTS WITH AOR CARRIEROTHERWISE TOWORKS PROVIDETHROUGH UTILIZATIONA REVIEWPERSON SERVICESTHAT ON BEHALF OFTHE CARRIER AND USES AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING THE UTILIZATION REVIEW;ANDREVIEW; (c) A BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ORGANIZATION OR MANAGED CARE ENTITY THAT USES AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCESYSTEM FORTHEPURPOSEOFCONDUCTINGUTILIZATION REVIEW OF MENTAL OR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES .
(3)(b) A PERSONDESCRIBEDINSUBSECTIONPHARMACY (2)OFTHISSECTIONTHATBENEFIT MANAGER OR PRIVATE UTILIZATION REVIEW ORGANIZATION THAT CONTRACTS WITH A CARRIER TO PROVIDE UTILIZATION REVIEW SERVICES ON BEHALF OF THE CARRIER AND USES AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM TOFOR CONDUCTTHE UTILIZATIONPURPOSE REVIEWOF SHALLCONDUCTING ENSURETHE THATUTILIZATION :REVIEW;
(a)AND THE(c) A BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ORGANIZATION OR MANAGED CARE ENTITY THAT USES AN ARTIFICIAL PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1139 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM BASESFOR ITSTHE DETERMINATIONPURPOSE ONOF THECONDUCTING FOLLOWINGUTILIZATION INFORMATIONREVIEW ,ASOF APPLICABLE:MENTAL OR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES .
(I)(3) A PERSON DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (2)OF THIS SECTION THAT USES AN INDIVIDUAL'SARTIFICIAL MEDICALINTELLIGENCE ORSYSTEM OTHERTO CLINICALCONDUCT HISTOR;UTILIZATION REVIEW SHALL ENSURE THAT :
(II)(a) IDIVIDUALCLINICALCIRCUMSTANCESASPRESENTEDBYTHET REQUESTINGHE PROVIDERARTIFICIAL ;ANDINTELLIGENCE (III)SYSTEM OHERRELEVANTCLINICALINFORMATIONCONTAINEDINTHEBASES INDIVIDUALITS SDETERMINATION MEDICALON ORTHE OTHERFOLLOWING CLINICALINFORMATION RECORD;,AS APPLICABLE :
(b)(I) THEAN ARTIFICIALINDIVIDUAL INTELLIGENCES SYSTEMMEDICAL DOESOR NOTOTHER BASECLINICAL ITSHISTORY DETERMINATIONS; SOLELY ON GROUP DATA ,WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE INDIVIDUAL S DATA;
-6-(II) 1139IDIVIDUAL (c)CLINICAL CIRCUMSTANCES AS PRESENTED BY THE ARTIFICIALREQUESTING INTELLIGENCEPROVIDER SYSTEM;AND IS(III) NOTOTHER USEDRELEVANT CLINICAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN ANYTHE WAYTHATDISCRIMINATESAGAINSTINDIVIDUALSINVIOLATIONOFOTHERINDIVIDUAL STATES MEDICAL OR FEDERALOTHER LAWS;CLINICAL RECORD ;
(d)(b) THET HE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ISDOES FAIRLYNOT ANDBASE EQUITABLYITS APPLIEDDETERMINATIONS ,INCLUDINGSOLELY INON ACCORDANCEGROUP WITHDATA APPLICABLE,WITHOUT REGULATIONSREFERENCE ANDTO GUIDANCE ISSUED BY THE FEDERALINDIVIDUAL DEPARTMENTS OFDATA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ;
(e)(c) THETHEARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE ARTIFICIALSYSTEMISNOT INTELLIGENCEUSEDINANYWAY SYSTEMTHATDISCRIMINATESAGAINSTINDIVIDUALSINVIOLATIONOFOTHERSTATE PRODUCESOR ANDFEDERAL RETAINSLAWS DOCUMENTATION; , AUDIT LOGS , AND MODEL GOVERNANCE RECORDS IN ORDER TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND SECTION 10-3-1104.9;
(f)(d) THETHEARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEMISFAIRLYANDEQUITABLY ARTIFICIALAPPLIED,INCLUDINGINACCORDANCE INTELLIGENCEWITHAPPLICABLE SYSTESREGULATIONSAND PERFORMANCEGUIDANCE ,ISSUED USE,BY ANDTHE OUTCOMESFEDERAL AREDEPARTMENT PERIODICALLYOF REVIEWEDHEALTH TOAND MAXIMIZEHUMAN ACCURACYSERVICES AND; RELIABILITY;
(g)(e) ATHE NARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE INDIVIDUALSSYSTEM HEALTHPRODUCES DATAAND ISRETAINS NOTDOCUMENTATION USED,AUDIT BEYONDLOGS ITS,AND INTENDEDORSTATEDPURPOSEMODEL ,CONSISTENTWITHAPPLICABLESTATEAND-GOVERNANCE FEDERALRECORDS LAWSIN ;ANDORDER (h)TO TDEMONSTRATE HECOMPLIANCE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTE'S OR ALGORITHM S CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES COMPLY WITH OTHERTHIS APPLICABLESECTION STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS CONCERNING UTILIZATION REVIEW AND COVERAGESECTION FOR10-3-1104.9; HEALTH -CARE SERVICES.
(4)(f) AT PERSONHE DESCRIBEDARTIFICIAL ININTELLIGENCE SUBSECTIONSYSTEM (2)OFS THISPERFORMANCE SECTION, SHALLUSE, PROVIDEANDOUTCOMESAREPERIODICALLYREVIEWEDTOMAXIMIZEACCURACYAND WRITTENRELIABILITY; DISCLOSURES TO THE DIVISIO, THE DEPARTMENTOFHUMANSERVICES ,ORTHEDEPARTMENTOFHEALTHCARE POLICY AND FINANCING,AS APPLICABLE,THAT IDENTIF:
(a)PAGE THE4-HOUSE UTILIZATIONBILL REVIEW26-1139 FUNCTIONS(g) FORA WHICHN THEINDIVIDUAL ARTIFICIALS INTELLIGENCEHEALTH SYSTEMDATA WILL BE US;D -7- 1139 (b) THE POINTS IN THE UTILIZATION REVIEW PROCESS WHEN THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM IS US;DNOT (c)USED THEBEYOND HUMANITS OVERSIGHTINTENDED PROCESS,OR INCLUDINGSTATED THEPURPOSE QUALIFICATIONS,CONSISTENT OFWITH THEAPPLICABLE REVIEWERSTATE AND WHETHERFEDERAL THELAWS A; HUMAN MUST APPROVE AN ADVERSE DETERMINATION ;AND (d) T HE PROCESS FOR MAINTAINING AUDIT INFORMATION SUFFICIENTTODEMONSTRATECOMPLIANCEWITHSUBSECTION (3)OFTHIS SECTION.
(5)AND (a)(h) NTWITHSTANDINGT SUBSECTIONHE (3)OF THIS SECTI,AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM MAYS BEOR USEDALGORITHM TOS ASSISTCRITERIA AND GUIDELINES COMPLY WITH OTHER APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS CONCERNING UTILIZATION REVIEW,INCLUDINGREVIEW EXPEDITEDAND APPROVALS.COVERAGE FOR HEALTH -CARE SERVICES .
(b)(4) A CARRIERSPERSONDESCRIBEDINSUBSECTION DENIAL(2)OFTHISSECTIONSHALL OFPROVIDE COVERAGEWRITTEN BASEDDISCLOSURES INTO WHOLETHE ORDIVISION IN, PART ON MEDICAL NECESSITY SHALL NOT BE ISSUED SOLELY ON THE OUTPUTDEPARTMENT OF AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM WITHOUT HUMAN REVIEWSERVICES AND, APPROVALOR OF THE DENIALDEPARTMENT BYOF A LICENSED CLINICIA, LICENSED PHYSICIAN, OR OTHER REGULATED PROFESSIONAL THAT IS COMPETENTTOEVALUATETHESPECIFICCLINICALISSUESINVOLVEDINTHE HEALTH -CARECARE SERVICESPOLICY REQUESTED BY THE PROVIDER AND AFINANCING REVIEW,AS OFAPPLICABLE,THAT THEHEALTHBENEFITPLANIDENTIFY 'STERMSOFCOVERAGEFORTHEHEALTH: CARE SERVICE.
(6)(a) ProhibitionTHEUTILIZATIONREVIEWFUNCTIONSFORWHICHTHEARTIFICIAL onINTELLIGENCE paymentSYSTEM forWILL AI-deliveredBE psychotherapyUSED services.;
(a)(b) AT CARRIERHE OFFERINGPOINTS A HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN ISSUED OR RENEWED IN THE STATEUTILIZATION ONREVIEW ORPROCESS AFTERWHEN THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTIONSHALLNOTPROVIDECOVERAGEFORSERVICESTHATCONSTITUTE PSYCHOTHERAPY SERVICES , AS DEFINED IN SECTION12-245-202 (14), THAT ARE PROVIDED DIRECTLY TO AN INDIVIDUAL AND THAT ARE -8- 1139 CONDUCTED BY AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTE.SYSTEM IS USED;
(b)(c) SUBSECTIONT (6)(aOFHE THISHUMAN SECTIONOVERSIGHT DOESPROCESS NOT, PROHIBITINCLUDING THE USEQUALIFICATIONSOFTHEREVIEWERANDWHETHERAHUMANMUSTAPPROVE OFAN BILLINGADVERSE SOFTWAREDETERMINATION ,ELECTRONIC;AND HEALTH(d) RECORDSTHEPROCESSFORMAINTAININGAUDITINFORMATIONSUFFICIENT , VIDEO PLATFORMS ,OROTHERNONTHERAPEUTICSOFTWARE TOOLSINCIDENT TO SERVICESDEMONSTRATE PROVIDEDCOMPLIANCE BYWITH ASUBSECTION HUMAN(3)OF PROVIDER.THIS SECTION.
(c)(5) TEUSEOFVIDEOCONFERENCING(a) MESSAGINGPLATFORMSNOTWITHSTANDING ,ORSUBSECTION OTHER(3)OF COMMUNICATIONSTHIS SOFTWARESECTION, TOAN ENABLEARTIFICIAL SUPERVISIONINTELLIGENCE ORSYSTEM CONSULTATIONMAY BYBE AUSED LICENSED,REGISTERED,ORTO CERTIFIEDASSIST INDIVIDUALWITH DOESUTILIZATION NOTREVIEW CONSTITUTE,INCLUDING SUPERVISIONEXPEDITED ORAPPROVALS CONSULTATION. THAT IS CONDUCTEDBYANARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEM ,ASREFERENCEDIN SUBSECTION (6)(aOF THIS SECTIO.
(b) A CARRIER S DENIALOFCOVERAGE BASED IN WHOLE OR IN PART ONMEDICALNECESSITYSHALLNOTBEISSUEDSOLELYONTHEOUTPUTOFAN ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEMWITHOUTHUMANREVIEWANDAPPROVAL OF THE DENIAL BY A LICENSED CLINICIAN,LICENSED PHYSICIAN,OR OTHER REGULATEDPROFESSIONALTHATISCOMPETENTTOEVALUATETHESPECIFIC CLINICAL ISSUES INVOLVED IN THE HEALTH-CARE SERVICES REQUESTED BY THE PROVIDER AND A REVIEW OF THE HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN 'S TERMS OF COVERAGE FOR THE HEALTH -CARE SERVICE .
PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 26-1139 (6) Prohibition on payment for AI-delivered psychotherapy services.
(a) A CARRIER OFFERING A HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN ISSUED OR RENEWEDINTHE STATE ONORAFTERTHE EFFECTIVE DATE OFTHISSECTION SHALL NOT PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR SERVICES THAT CONSTITUTE PSYCHOTHERAPYSERVICES ,ASDEFINED IN SECTION12-245-202(14),THAT AREPROVIDEDDIRECTLYTOANINDIVIDUALANDTHAT ARE CONDUCTEDBY AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM (b) SBSECTION (6)(aOFTHISSECTIONDOESNOTPROHIBITTHEUSE OF BILLING SOFTWARE,ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS ,VIDEO PLATFORMS , OR OTHER NONTHERAPEUTIC SOFTWARE TOOLS INCIDENT TO SERVICES PROVIDED BY A HUMAN PROVIDER .
(c) THE USE OF VIDEOCONFERENCING ,MESSAGING PLATFORMS ,OR OTHER COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE TO ENABLE SUPERVISION OR CONSULTATIONBYALICENSED REGISTERED ,ORCERTIFIEDINDIVIDUALDOES NOT CONSTITUTE SUPERVISION OR CONSULTATION THAT IS CONDUCTED BY ANARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCESYSTEM ASREFERENCEDINSUBSECTION (6)(a) OF THIS SECTIO.
A PAYER OF MENTAL OR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH -CARE SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THE "C"COLORADO OLORADO M EDICAL ASSISTANCEA SSISTANCE A CT",AS SPECIFIEDINARTICLES4,5ANDSPECIFIED 6IN OFTHISTITLE25.5ORTHEARTICLES,5,AND "C6OF HILDRENSTHIS BTITL25.5,OR ASICHEALTHTHE"C PLANHILDREN'S ACT",ASSPECIFIEDINARTICLE8BASIC OFTHISTITLE25.5,HEALTH SHALLP NOTLAN PAYACT",AS FORSPECIFIED SERVICES THAT CONSTITUTE PSYCHOTHERAPY SERVICES,AS DEFINED IN SECTIO12-245-202(14)THATARTICL8OF ARETHIS PROVIDEDTITL25.5, DIRECTLYSHALLNOTPAYFORSERVICESTHATCONSTITUTEPSYCHOTHERAPYSERVICES TO, ANASDEFINEDINSECTION INDIVIDUAL12-245-202(14),THAT ANDAREPROVIDEDDIRECTLYTO THATANINDIVIDUALANDTHATARECONDUCTEDBYANARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE ARESYSTEM CONDUCTED,AS BY AN ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE SYSTEMAS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN SECTIONSECTI10-16-112.7 10-16-112.7 (1)(b).
except that, if a -9-referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestate 1139PAGE referendum6-HOUSE petitionBILL is26-1139 filedconstitutionagainstthisactor pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of thisthisactwithinthe actninety-dayperiod within the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved bybythe the people at the general election to be held in November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect January1,January 1, 2027, or on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon bytheby the governor, whichever is later.
-10-____________________________ 1139____________________________ Julie McCluskie James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________ ____________________________ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 7-HOUSE BILL 26-1139
Show all 80 changed rows (40 more)
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Health & Human Services
Sponsors
- Sheila Lieder · Primary
- Monica Duran · Cosponsor
- Meg Froelich · Cosponsor
- Mandy Lindsay · Cosponsor
- Kenny Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Tammy Story · Cosponsor
- Brianna Titone · Cosponsor
- K. Mullica · Cosponsor
- J. Marchman · Cosponsor
- C. Kipp · Cosponsor
- I. Jodeh · Cosponsor
- N. Hinrichsen · Cosponsor
- J. Gonzales · Cosponsor
- J. Coleman · Cosponsor
- J. Amabile · Cosponsor
- L. Daugherty · Primary
- L. Cutter · Primary
- Junie Joseph · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 83 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- Sheila Lieder Democrat
- L. Daugherty
- L. Cutter
- Junie Joseph Democrat
Co-sponsors (14)
- Monica Duran Democrat
- Meg Froelich Democrat
- Mandy Lindsay Democrat
- Kenny Nguyen Democrat
- Tammy Story Democrat
- Brianna Titone Democrat
- K. Mullica
- J. Marchman
- C. Kipp
- I. Jodeh
- N. Hinrichsen
- J. Gonzales
- J. Coleman
- J. Amabile
Not signed on (83)
83 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 83 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 8% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Yea |
| Gretchen Rydin | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsay Gilchrist | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Feret | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Carlos Barron | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Nay |
| Dusty Johnson | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1139 do?
- On and after January 1, 2027, when determining coverage for health-care services, the act requires entities that use an artificial intelligence system (AI system) for the purpose of conducting utilization review of health-care services, including health insurance companies (carriers), pharmacy benefit managers, private utilization review organizations, behavioral health administrative services organizations, and managed care entities (entities), ensure that the AI system complies with certain requirements specified in the act. Specifically, an entity shall ensure that the AI system:Makes determinations based on medical or clinical history, the patient's individual clinical circumstances, and other relevant clinical factors specified in the act, with denial of coverage reviewed by a licensed clinician or physician or other competent regulated professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues and review the health benefit plan's terms of coverage (competent regulated professional);Does not base its determination solely on group data without reference to the individual's data;Is not used in any way that discriminates against individuals in violation of other state or federal laws and is fairly and equitably applied, including in accordance with regulations and guidance issued by the federal department of health and human services; andIs periodically reviewed to ensure the AI systems outcomes are accurate and reliable and that an individual's health data is not used beyond its intended or stated purpose. Entities that use AI systems shall disclose to the division of insurance, the department of human services, or the department of health care policy and financing, as applicable, the utilization review functions for which the AI system will be used and the points in the utilization review process when it will be used, the process for human oversight of adverse coverage determinations, and the process for maintaining audit information to ensure that the use of the AI system complies with the requirements in the act. The AI system may be used to assist in utilization review, including expedited approvals. A carrier's denial of coverage for a service based in whole or in part on medical necessity shall not be issued solely on the output of an AI system without human review by a licensed clinician or physician or other competent regulated professional. Further, the act prohibits a carrier and a payer of services under the 'Colorado Medical Assistance Act' and the 'Children's Basic Health Plan Act' from paying for psychotherapy services that are provided directly to a client and that are conducted by an AI system.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors HB 1139?
- HB 1139 is sponsored by Sheila Lieder (Democrat), Monica Duran (Democrat), Meg Froelich (Democrat), Mandy Lindsay (Democrat), Kenny Nguyen (Democrat), Tammy Story (Democrat), Brianna Titone (Democrat), K. Mullica, J. Marchman, C. Kipp, I. Jodeh, N. Hinrichsen, J. Gonzales, J. Coleman, J. Amabile, L. Daugherty, L. Cutter, and Junie Joseph (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1139?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1139?
- Track HB 1139 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1139
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1139
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →