HB 1119 — Authority for Different Mill Levy Rates
Last action — House Committee on Finance Postpone Indefinitely
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced February 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Mixed recorded votes
4 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Section 2 of the bill allows local governments and certain special districts authorized to impose property taxes (local taxing entities) to tax certain land and improvements thereon at different mill levy rates, provided that the mill levy rate for the improvements is less than or equal to the mill levy rate for the land. A local taxing entity may not impose different mill levy rates for agricultural land, land used for renewable energy production, land subject to a perpetual conservation easement, leaseholds and lands producing oil or gas, producing mines or nonproducing mining claims, or state-assessed land. Nothing in section 2 allows a local taxing entity to impose property taxes on the assessed value of land and the assessed value of improvements thereon at different mill levy rates in a manner that is not consistent with section 20 of article X of the state constitution or any statutory limitation on the local taxing entity's mill levy rates or total property tax revenue. Section 3 requires boards of county commissioners and other local taxing entities to include with their certifications of all property tax levies the individual certification of any local taxing entity required by section 5 regarding the different mill levy rates used for land and improvements thereon by the local taxing entity. Section 4 updates the tax and levy rate information required to be made publicly available to include the specific, different mill levy rates used for land and improvements thereon, if applicable. Section 5 modifies the duty of local taxing entities to certify their property tax levy to the board of county commissioners to require any local taxing entity that imposes property taxes on the assessed value of land and the assessed value of improvements thereon at different rates, as allowed by section 2 , to specify those mill levy rates in the local taxing entity's certification of its levy.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf February 04, 2026
Action History
-
House Committee on Finance Postpone Indefinitely
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Finance
Sponsors
- Steven Woodrow · Primary
- N. Hinrichsen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 99 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Steven Woodrow Democrat Voted No
- N. Hinrichsen
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (99)
99 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 99 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 27% | 73% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Nay |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebekah Stewart | Democrat | Nay |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Nay |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Nay |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Nay |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Nay |
| Ryan Gonzalez | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Rebekah Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Nay |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Yea |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Gonzalez | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1119 do?
- Section 2 of the bill allows local governments and certain special districts authorized to impose property taxes (local taxing entities) to tax certain land and improvements thereon at different mill levy rates, provided that the mill levy rate for the improvements is less than or equal to the mill levy rate for the land. A local taxing entity may not impose different mill levy rates for agricultural land, land used for renewable energy production, land subject to a perpetual conservation easement, leaseholds and lands producing oil or gas, producing mines or nonproducing mining claims, or state-assessed land. Nothing in section 2 allows a local taxing entity to impose property taxes on the assessed value of land and the assessed value of improvements thereon at different mill levy rates in a manner that is not consistent with section 20 of article X of the state constitution or any statutory limitation on the local taxing entity's mill levy rates or total property tax revenue. Section 3 requires boards of county commissioners and other local taxing entities to include with their certifications of all property tax levies the individual certification of any local taxing entity required by section 5 regarding the different mill levy rates used for land and improvements thereon by the local taxing entity. Section 4 updates the tax and levy rate information required to be made publicly available to include the specific, different mill levy rates used for land and improvements thereon, if applicable. Section 5 modifies the duty of local taxing entities to certify their property tax levy to the board of county commissioners to require any local taxing entity that imposes property taxes on the assessed value of land and the assessed value of improvements thereon at different rates, as allowed by section 2 , to specify those mill levy rates in the local taxing entity's certification of its levy.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
- Who sponsors HB 1119?
- HB 1119 is sponsored by Steven Woodrow (Democrat) and N. Hinrichsen.
- What is the current status of HB 1119?
- This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced February 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 1119?
- Track HB 1119 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1119
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1119
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →