HB 1060 — Expand Criminal Jurisdiction for Out-of-State Conduct
Last action — House Committee on Judiciary Postpone Indefinitely
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced January 14, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
The bill clarifies that the criminal jurisdiction of prosecutions includes conduct that causes injury, loss, damage, or deprivation of a thing of value, rights, privileges, access, or identity to a person located in the state.Jurisdiction exists even if a defendant does not have actual knowledge that the victim is located in the state.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf January 14, 2026
Action History
-
House Committee on Judiciary Postpone Indefinitely
-
House Committee on Judiciary Witness Testimony and/or Committee Discussion Only
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
Sponsors
- M. Snyder · Primary
- Ava Flanell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 99 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- M. Snyder
- Ava Flanell Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (99)
99 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 99 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 0% | 0% | 27% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Not Voting |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1060 do?
- The bill clarifies that the criminal jurisdiction of prosecutions includes conduct that causes injury, loss, damage, or deprivation of a thing of value, rights, privileges, access, or identity to a person located in the state.Jurisdiction exists even if a defendant does not have actual knowledge that the victim is located in the state.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
- Who sponsors HB 1060?
- HB 1060 is sponsored by M. Snyder and Ava Flanell (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 1060?
- This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced January 14, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 1060?
- Track HB 1060 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1060
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1060
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →