Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted 12 D cosponsors

HB 1045 — Disabilities Housing Protections

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 28, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 66% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 26 sponsors

    4 primary, 22 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (12 D).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    5 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill clarifies protections for assistance animals in housing for individuals with disabilities.

This legislation outlines how reasonable accommodations for assistance animals are to be assessed in housing situations. It defines key terms and offers guidelines for housing providers regarding the documentation of disabilities and the evaluation of assistance animal behavior.

What this means for you
  • Workers: Workers assisting individuals with disabilities may find improved clarity in what constitutes reasonable accommodations related to assistance animals.
  • Families: This means families with members who have disabilities may have clearer pathways to secure assistance animals in their housing.

Summary

The act specifies relevant factors for assessing reasonable accommodations related to assistance animals that may be necessary for an individual with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing under the 'Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act'. Permitting an assistance animal is presumed to be a reasonable accommodation if a housing provider has been given an opportunity to engage in an interactive accommodation process with the individual requesting the accommodation. The act also:Defines 'reasonable accommodation', as it applies to discriminatory housing practices, as an exception or adjustment to a rule, policy, practice, or service that may be necessary for an individual with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing, including public and common-use spaces;Defines 'assistance animal' as an animal that does work, performs tasks, assists, or provides therapeutic emotional support to an individual with a disability. 'Assistance animal' includes emotional support animals and service animals.Defines 'emotional support animal' as an animal that provides solely emotional support to an individual to alleviate a symptom or an effect of a disability;Permits a housing provider to request reasonable documentation to support an individual's claim of disability or disability-related need for an assistance animal if the individual's disability or disability-related need is not obvious; andPermits a housing provider, when considering a reasonable accommodation request, to consider documented, specific conduct of an assistance animal that poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others or that causes substantial physical damage to property.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

62 added · 70 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill HB 1045 adds clarity regarding housing protections for individuals with disabilities, specifically around the definition of "assistance animal" and the need for reasonable accommodations. It now explicitly states that individuals must demonstrate their need for an assistance animal to address a disability, which aims to reduce confusion and inconsistent interpretations of the law. This change is important because it promotes a better understanding of rights and responsibilities for both individuals needing assistance and housing providers, ultimately aiming to decrease unnecessary legal disputes.

→
Previous
Latest
NOTE:
HOUSE BILL 26-1045 BYREPRESENTATIVE(S) Clifford and Zokaie, Bacon, Froelich, Garcia, Joseph, Lindsay, Mabrey, Nguyen, Rutinel, Sirota, Story, Woodrow;
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
also SENATOR(S) Danielson and Kipp, Amabile, Benavidez, Cutter, Exum, Gonzales J., Jodeh, Kollfor, ··Marchman, Wallace, Weissman, Coleman.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
CONCERNING HOUSING PROTECTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES.
HOUSE BILL 26-1045 BYREPRESENTATIVE(S)CliffordandZokaie,Bacon,Froelich,Garcia, Joseph, Lindsay, Mabrey, Nguyen, Rutinel, Sirota, Story, Woodrow;
Be it enacted by the GeneralAssembly ofthe State ofColorado:
also SENATOR(S) Danielson and Kipp, Amabile, Benavidez, Cutter, Exum, Gonzales J., Jodeh, Kolker, Marchman, Wallace, Weissman, Coleman.
CONCERNING HOUSING PROTECTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES .
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
A reasonable accommodation encompasses a broad range of disability-relatedneedsand isintendedtoprovideflexibilityforbothhousingprovidersandindividuals with disabilities to achieve equitable outcomes.
A reasonable accommodation encompasses a broad range ofdisability-related needs and is intendedto provide flexibility for bothhousingproviders and individuals with disabilities to achieve equitable outcomes.
(b) Under existing law, an individual seeking a reasonable accommodationtokeepanassistanceanimalisrequiredtodemonstratethat Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
(b) Under existing law, an individual seeking a reasonable accommodationto keepanassistance animal isrequiredtodemonstratethat Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsfrom existing law andsuch material is notpart of the act.
theyhave a disabilityand that the assistance animal is necessaryto address a disability-related need;
they have a disability and that the assistance animal is necessary to address a disability-related need;
These changes include the rescission of federal guidance that previously assisted housing providers andindividualswithdisabilitiesinunderstandingtheirrespectiverightsand obligations regarding assistance animals.
These changes include the rescission of federal guidance that previously assisted housing providers andindividualswithdisabilities inunderstandingtheirrespectiverights and obligations regarding assistance animals.
As a result, the absence of clear guidance has led to confusion and inconsistent interpretation of applicable laws.
As a result, the absence ofclear guidance has led to confusion and inconsistent interpretation ofapplicable laws.
By doing so, the general assembly intends to provide clarityand predictabilityfor both housing providers and individualswithdisabilities,promoteconsistentapplicationofthelaw,and reduceunnecessarylitigationarisingfromambiguityinacommonlyapplied statute.
By doing so, the general assembly intends to provide clarity and predictability for both housing providers and individuals with disabilities, promote consistent application ofthe law, and reduceunnecessarylitigationarisingfrom ambiguityinacommonlyapplied statute.
(2.5) "ASSISTANCE ANIMAL "MEANS AN ANIMAL THAT DOES WORK , PERFORMSTASKS ,ASSISTS ,ORPROVIDESTHERAPEUTICEMOTIONALSUPPORT TOANINDIVIDUALWITHADISABILITY ."ASSISTANCEANIMAL "INCLUDESAN EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMAL AND A SERVICE ANIMAL .
(2.5) "ASSISTANCE ANIMAL" MEANS AN ANIMAL THAT DOES WORK, PERFORMSTASKS,ASSISTS, ORPROVIDES THERAPEUTIC EMOTIONALSUPPORT TOANINDIVIDUAL WITHADISABILITY.
(8.5) "E MOTIONAL SUPPORT A NIMAL " MEANS AN ANIMAL THAT PROVIDESSOLELYEMOTIONALSUPPORTTOANINDIVIDUALTOALLEVIATEA SYMPTOM OR AN EFFECT OF A DISABILITY .
"ASSISTANCEANIMAL" INCLUDES AN EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMAL AND A SERVICE ANIMAL.
(8.5) "EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMAL" MEANS AN ANIMAL THAT PROVIDES SOLELYEMOTIONALSUPPORT TO AN INDIVIDUAL TO ALLEVIATE A SYMPTOM ORAN EFFECT OF A DISABILITY.
(3.5) "REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION " MEANS AN EXCEPTION OR ADJUSTMENT TO A RULE ,POLICY ,PRACTICE ,OR SERVICE THAT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY TO HAVE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO USE AND ENJOY HOUSING , INCLUDING PUBLIC AND COMMON -USE SPACES .
(3.5) "REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION" MEANS AN EXCEPTION OR ADJUSTMENT TO A RULE, POLICY, PRACTICE, OR SERVICE THAT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY TO HAVE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO USE AND ENJOY HOUSING, INCLUDING PUBLIC AND COMMON-USE SPACES.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-34-502, add (1)(a)(III) as follows:
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-34-502, add (l)(a)(III) as follows:
(1) It is an unfair housing practice, unlawful, and prohibited:
(1) Itis an unfair housing practice, unlawful, and prohibited:
(a) (III) FOR THE PURPOSES OF SUBSECTION (1)(a)(IOF THIS SECTION :
(a) (III) FOR THE PURPOSES OF SUBSECTION (l)(a)(I) OF THIS SECTION:
(A) T HE MERE PRESENCE OF AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A DIRECT THREAT TO HEALTH OR SAFETY .
(A) THE MERE PRESENCE OF AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A DIRECT THREAT TO HEALTH OR SAFETY.
(B) THE MERE PRESENCE OF AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL IS NOT PRESUMEDTORESULTINSUBSTANTIALPHYSICALDAMAGETOTHEPROPERTY OF OTHERS .
(B) THE MERE PRESENCE OF AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL IS NOT PRESUMEDTORESULTINSUBSTANTIALPHYSICALDAMAGETOTHEPROPERTY OF OTHERS.
(C) A HOUSING PROVIDER MAY CONSIDER DOCUMENTED ,SPECIFIC CONDUCT OFANASSISTANCE ANIMALTHAT POSESADIRECTTHREAT TOTHE HEALTHORSAFETYOFOTHERSORCAUSESSUBSTANTIALPHYSICALDAMAGE TO PROPERTY .
(C) A HOUSING PROVIDER MAY CONSIDER DOCUMENTED, SPECIFIC CONDUCTOFAN ASSISTANCE ANIMALTHAT POSES ADIRECTTHREATTOTHE HEALTHORSAFETYOFOTHERSORCAUSES SUBSTANTIALPHYSICALDAMAGE TO PROPERTY.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-34-502.2, amend (2) introductory portion and (2)(b) as follows:
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-34-502.2amend (2) introductory portion and (2)(b) as follows:
Unfairordiscriminatoryhousingpracticesagainst individuals with disabilities prohibited.
Unfair ordiscriminatory housing practicesagainst individuals with disabilities prohibited.
(2) For purposes of this section, "discrimination" includes both segregate and separate and includes but is not limited toLL OF THE FOLLOWING :
(2) For purposes o f this section, "discrimination" includes both segregate and separate and includes but is not limited to ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1045 (b) (I) A refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services when such accommodations may be necessaryto afford the individualwith a disabilityequal opportunityto use and enjoy a dwelling.
PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1045 (b) (I) A refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rnles, policies, practices, or set vices when such accommodations may be necessary to afford the individual with a disability equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling.
and (II) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBSECTION (2)(b):
and (II)FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBSECTION (2)(b):
(A) P ERMITTING AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL IN HOUSING IS PRESUMED TO BE A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION ,SO LONG AS A HOUSING PROVIDER HAS BEEN GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO ENGAGE IN AN INTERACTIVE ACCOMMODATION PROCESS WITH THE INDIVIDUAL REQUESTING THE ACCOMMODATION ;
(A) PERMITTING AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL IN HOUSING IS PRESUMED TO BE A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION, SO LONG AS A HOUSING PROVIDER HAS BEEN GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO ENGAGE IN AN INTERACTIVE ACCOMMODATION PROCESS WITH THE INDIVIDUAL REQUESTING THE ACCOMMODATION;
(B) THE COMPLETE PROHIBITION OF ASSISTANCE ANIMALS IN HOUSING IS PRESUMED TO BE DISCRIMINATORY UNDER THIS PART 5;AND (C) A HOUSING PROVIDER DOES NOT ENGAGE IN A DISCRIMINATORY HOUSINGPRACTICESOLELYFORREQUESTINGREASONABLEDOCUMENTATION SUPPORTINGTHECLAIMOFDISABILITYORDISABILITY -RELATEDNEEDFORAN ASSISTANCE ANIMALORENGAGINGINAGOODFAITHINTERACTIVE PROCESS TO EVALUATE A REQUEST FOR AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL , UNLESS THE DISABILITY OR DISABILITY RELATED NEED IS OBVIOUS.
(B) THE COMPLETE PROHIBITION OF ASSISTANCE ANIMALS IN HOUSING IS PRESUMED TO BE DISCRIMINATORY UNDER THIS PART 5;
AND (C) A HOUSING PROVIDER DOES NOT ENGAGE IN A DISCRIMINATORY HOUSING PRACTICESOLELY FORREQUESTING REASONABLE DOCUMENTATION SUPPORTINGTHECLAIMOFDISABILITYORDISABILITY-RELATEDNEEDFORAN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL OR ENGAGING IN A GOOD FAITH INTERACTIVE PROCESS TO EVALUATE A REQUEST FOR AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL, UNLESS THE DISABILITY OR DISABILITY RELATED NEED IS OBVIOUS.
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiod after final adjournment of the general assembly(August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment ofthe general assembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
except that, if a referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestate constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1045 approvedbythepeopleatthegeneralelectiontobeheldinNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
except that, if a referendumpetition is filed pursuantto section 1(3) ofarticle V ofthe state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1045 approved bythepeople atthe general election to be held inNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date ofthe official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
____________________________ ____________________________ Julie McCluskie James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
J ~ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________ ____________________________ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE v ~ ~ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED l tTh'VY"\.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 26-1045
~ Vvlft z_~t\.<.D2-/e,0\,-l-$ 0 ~ (DJte and ime) ' PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 26-1045
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  3. Signed by the President of the Senate

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments

  7. Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  8. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing

  9. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  10. House Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  11. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  12. House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  13. House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

  14. Introduced In House - Assigned to Transportation, Housing & Local Government

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 22 co-sponsors · 75 not signed on · 19 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (22)

Not signed on (75)

75 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 75 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

BILL

Passed 24 Yea · 12 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3200
Democrat 21000
Republican 01000
Total 241200
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Nay
Pelton R. — Nay
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Nay
Cleave Simpson Republican Nay
Janice Rich Republican Nay
John Carson Republican Nay
Larry Liston Republican Nay
Lisa Frizell Republican Nay
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Nay
Marc Catlin Republican Nay
Mark Baisley Republican Nay
Scott Bright Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Adopt amendment L.004

Failed 1 Yea · 11 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 0900
Republican 1201
Total 11101
% of votes cast 8%85%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Amy Paschal Democrat Nay
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Nay
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Nay
Jacque Phillips Democrat Nay
Jamie Jackson Democrat Nay
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Nay
Mandy Lindsay Democrat Nay
Meg Froelich Democrat Nay
Rebekah Stewart Democrat Nay
Chris Richardson Republican Nay
Larry Don Suckla Republican Yea
Max Brooks Republican Nay
Ron Weinberg Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 3 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 9000
Republican 0301
Total 9301
% of votes cast 69%23%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Amy Paschal Democrat Yea
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Jacque Phillips Democrat Yea
Jamie Jackson Democrat Yea
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Yea
Mandy Lindsay Democrat Yea
Meg Froelich Democrat Yea
Rebekah Stewart Democrat Yea
Chris Richardson Republican Nay
Larry Don Suckla Republican Nay
Max Brooks Republican Nay
Ron Weinberg Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1045 do?
The act specifies relevant factors for assessing reasonable accommodations related to assistance animals that may be necessary for an individual with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing under the 'Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act'. Permitting an assistance animal is presumed to be a reasonable accommodation if a housing provider has been given an opportunity to engage in an interactive accommodation process with the individual requesting the accommodation. The act also:Defines 'reasonable accommodation', as it applies to discriminatory housing practices, as an exception or adjustment to a rule, policy, practice, or service that may be necessary for an individual with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing, including public and common-use spaces;Defines 'assistance animal' as an animal that does work, performs tasks, assists, or provides therapeutic emotional support to an individual with a disability. 'Assistance animal' includes emotional support animals and service animals.Defines 'emotional support animal' as an animal that provides solely emotional support to an individual to alleviate a symptom or an effect of a disability;Permits a housing provider to request reasonable documentation to support an individual's claim of disability or disability-related need for an assistance animal if the individual's disability or disability-related need is not obvious; andPermits a housing provider, when considering a reasonable accommodation request, to consider documented, specific conduct of an assistance animal that poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others or that causes substantial physical damage to property.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors HB 1045?
HB 1045 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, Yara Zokaie (Democrat), Meg Froelich (Democrat), Junie Joseph (Democrat), Mandy Lindsay (Democrat), Javier Mabrey (Democrat), Manny Rutinel (Democrat), Emily Sirota (Democrat), Tammy Story (Democrat), Steven Woodrow (Democrat), M. Weissman, K. Wallace, J. Marchman, C. Kolker, I. Jodeh, J. Gonzales, T. Exum, L. Cutter, J. Coleman, J. Amabile, L. García, C. Kipp, J. Danielson, Jennifer Bacon (Democrat), Chad Clifford (Democrat), and Kenny Nguyen (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1045?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 1045?
Track HB 1045 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1045

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1045

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →