HB 1045 — Disabilities Housing Protections
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 28, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
26 sponsors
4 primary, 22 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (12 D).
-
Mixed recorded votes
5 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill clarifies protections for assistance animals in housing for individuals with disabilities.
This legislation outlines how reasonable accommodations for assistance animals are to be assessed in housing situations. It defines key terms and offers guidelines for housing providers regarding the documentation of disabilities and the evaluation of assistance animal behavior.
What this means for you
- Workers: Workers assisting individuals with disabilities may find improved clarity in what constitutes reasonable accommodations related to assistance animals.
- Families: This means families with members who have disabilities may have clearer pathways to secure assistance animals in their housing.
Summary
The act specifies relevant factors for assessing reasonable accommodations related to assistance animals that may be necessary for an individual with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing under the 'Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act'. Permitting an assistance animal is presumed to be a reasonable accommodation if a housing provider has been given an opportunity to engage in an interactive accommodation process with the individual requesting the accommodation. The act also:Defines 'reasonable accommodation', as it applies to discriminatory housing practices, as an exception or adjustment to a rule, policy, practice, or service that may be necessary for an individual with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing, including public and common-use spaces;Defines 'assistance animal' as an animal that does work, performs tasks, assists, or provides therapeutic emotional support to an individual with a disability. 'Assistance animal' includes emotional support animals and service animals.Defines 'emotional support animal' as an animal that provides solely emotional support to an individual to alleviate a symptom or an effect of a disability;Permits a housing provider to request reasonable documentation to support an individual's claim of disability or disability-related need for an assistance animal if the individual's disability or disability-related need is not obvious; andPermits a housing provider, when considering a reasonable accommodation request, to consider documented, specific conduct of an assistance animal that poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others or that causes substantial physical damage to property.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
62 added · 70 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill HB 1045 adds clarity regarding housing protections for individuals with disabilities, specifically around the definition of "assistance animal" and the need for reasonable accommodations. It now explicitly states that individuals must demonstrate their need for an assistance animal to address a disability, which aims to reduce confusion and inconsistent interpretations of the law. This change is important because it promotes a better understanding of rights and responsibilities for both individuals needing assistance and housing providers, ultimately aiming to decrease unnecessary legal disputes.
NOTE:HOUSE BILL 26-1045 BYREPRESENTATIVE(S) Clifford and Zokaie, Bacon, Froelich, Garcia, Joseph, Lindsay, Mabrey, Nguyen, Rutinel, Sirota, Story, Woodrow;
Thisalso billSENATOR(S) hasDanielson beenand preparedKipp, forAmabile, theBenavidez, signaturesCutter, ofExum, theGonzales appropriateJ., legislativeJodeh, officersKollfor, and··Marchman, theWallace, Governor.Weissman, Coleman.
ToCONCERNING determineHOUSING whetherPROTECTIONS theFOR GovernorINDIVIDUALS hasWITH signedDISABILITIES. the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
HOUSEBe BILLit 26-1045enacted BYREPRESENTATIVE(S)CliffordandZokaie,Bacon,Froelich,Garcia,by Joseph,the Lindsay,GeneralAssembly Mabrey,ofthe Nguyen,State Rutinel,ofColorado: Sirota, Story, Woodrow;
also SENATOR(S) Danielson and Kipp, Amabile, Benavidez, Cutter, Exum, Gonzales J., Jodeh, Kolker, Marchman, Wallace, Weissman, Coleman.
CONCERNING HOUSING PROTECTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES .
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
A reasonable accommodation encompasses a broad range ofofdisability-related disability-relatedneedsandneeds isintendedtoprovideflexibilityforbothhousingprovidersandindividualsand is intendedto provide flexibility for bothhousingproviders and individuals with disabilities to achieve equitable outcomes.
(b) Under existing law, an individual seeking a reasonable accommodationtokeepanassistanceanimalisrequiredtodemonstratethataccommodationto keepanassistance animal isrequiredtodemonstratethat Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsdeletionsfrom from existing law andandsuch such material is notnotpart part of the act.
theyhavethey have a disabilityanddisability and that the assistance animal is necessarytonecessary to address a disability-related need;
These changes include the rescission of federal guidance that previously assisted housing providers andindividualswithdisabilitiesinunderstandingtheirrespectiverightsandandindividualswithdisabilities inunderstandingtheirrespectiverights and obligations regarding assistance animals.
As a result, the absence ofofclear clear guidance has led to confusion and inconsistent interpretation ofofapplicable applicable laws.
By doing so, the general assembly intends to provide clarityandclarity predictabilityforand predictability for both housing providers and individualswithdisabilities,promoteconsistentapplicationofthelaw,andindividuals reduceunnecessarylitigationarisingfromambiguityinacommonlyappliedwith disabilities, promote consistent application ofthe law, and reduceunnecessarylitigationarisingfrom ambiguityinacommonlyapplied statute.
(2.5) "ASSISTANCE ANIMALANIMAL" "MEANSMEANS AN ANIMAL THAT DOES WORKWORK, ,PERFORMSTASKS,ASSISTS, PERFORMSTASKSORPROVIDES ,ASSISTSTHERAPEUTIC ,ORPROVIDESTHERAPEUTICEMOTIONALSUPPORTEMOTIONALSUPPORT TOANINDIVIDUALWITHADISABILITYTOANINDIVIDUAL ."ASSISTANCEANIMALWITHADISABILITY. "INCLUDESAN EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMAL AND A SERVICE ANIMAL .
(8.5)"ASSISTANCEANIMAL" "EINCLUDES MOTIONALAN EMOTIONAL SUPPORT A NIMAL " MEANS AN ANIMAL THATAND PROVIDESSOLELYEMOTIONALSUPPORTTOANINDIVIDUALTOALLEVIATEA SYMPTOM OR AN EFFECT OF A DISABILITYSERVICE .ANIMAL.
(8.5) "EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMAL" MEANS AN ANIMAL THAT PROVIDES SOLELYEMOTIONALSUPPORT TO AN INDIVIDUAL TO ALLEVIATE A SYMPTOM ORAN EFFECT OF A DISABILITY.
(3.5) "REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONACCOMMODATION" " MEANS AN EXCEPTION OR ADJUSTMENT TO A RULERULE, ,POLICYPOLICY, ,PRACTICEPRACTICE, ,OROR SERVICE THAT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY TO HAVE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO USE AND ENJOY HOUSINGHOUSING, , INCLUDING PUBLIC AND COMMONCOMMON-USE -USESPACES. SPACES .
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-34-502, add (1)(a)(III)(l)(a)(III) as follows:
(1) ItItis is an unfair housing practice, unlawful, and prohibited:
(a) (III) FOR THE PURPOSES OF SUBSECTION (1)(a)(IOF(l)(a)(I) OF THIS SECTIONSECTION: :
(A) TTHE HE MERE PRESENCE OF AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A DIRECT THREAT TO HEALTH OR SAFETYSAFETY. .
(B) THE MERE PRESENCE OF AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL IS NOT PRESUMEDTORESULTINSUBSTANTIALPHYSICALDAMAGETOTHEPROPERTY OF OTHERSOTHERS. .
(C) A HOUSING PROVIDER MAY CONSIDER DOCUMENTEDDOCUMENTED, ,SPECIFICSPECIFIC CONDUCTCONDUCTOFAN OFANASSISTANCEASSISTANCE ANIMALTHAT POSESADIRECTTHREATPOSES TOTHEADIRECTTHREATTOTHE HEALTHORSAFETYOFOTHERSORCAUSESSUBSTANTIALPHYSICALDAMAGEHEALTHORSAFETYOFOTHERSORCAUSES SUBSTANTIALPHYSICALDAMAGE TO PROPERTYPROPERTY. .
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-34-502.2,24-34-502.2amend amend (2) introductory portion and (2)(b) as follows:
UnfairordiscriminatoryhousingpracticesagainstUnfair ordiscriminatory housing practicesagainst individuals with disabilities prohibited.
(2) For purposes ofo f this section, "discrimination" includes both segregate and separate and includes but is not limited toLLto ALL OF THE FOLLOWINGFOLLOWING: :
PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1045 (b) (I) A refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules,rnles, policies, practices, or servicesset vices when such accommodations may be necessarytonecessary to afford the individualwithindividual with a disabilityequaldisability opportunitytoequal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling.
and (II)(II)FOR FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBSECTION (2)(b):
(A) PPERMITTING ERMITTING AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL IN HOUSING IS PRESUMED TO BE A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONACCOMMODATION, ,SOSO LONG AS A HOUSING PROVIDER HAS BEEN GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO ENGAGE IN AN INTERACTIVE ACCOMMODATION PROCESS WITH THE INDIVIDUAL REQUESTING THE ACCOMMODATIONACCOMMODATION; ;
(B) THE COMPLETE PROHIBITION OF ASSISTANCE ANIMALS IN HOUSING IS PRESUMED TO BE DISCRIMINATORY UNDER THIS PART 5;AND5; (C) A HOUSING PROVIDER DOES NOT ENGAGE IN A DISCRIMINATORY HOUSINGPRACTICESOLELYFORREQUESTINGREASONABLEDOCUMENTATION SUPPORTINGTHECLAIMOFDISABILITYORDISABILITY -RELATEDNEEDFORAN ASSISTANCE ANIMALORENGAGINGINAGOODFAITHINTERACTIVE PROCESS TO EVALUATE A REQUEST FOR AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL , UNLESS THE DISABILITY OR DISABILITY RELATED NEED IS OBVIOUS.
AND (C) A HOUSING PROVIDER DOES NOT ENGAGE IN A DISCRIMINATORY HOUSING PRACTICESOLELY FORREQUESTING REASONABLE DOCUMENTATION SUPPORTINGTHECLAIMOFDISABILITYORDISABILITY-RELATEDNEEDFORAN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL OR ENGAGING IN A GOOD FAITH INTERACTIVE PROCESS TO EVALUATE A REQUEST FOR AN ASSISTANCE ANIMAL, UNLESS THE DISABILITY OR DISABILITY RELATED NEED IS OBVIOUS.
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiodninety-day period after final adjournment ofofthe the general assembly(Augustassembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
except that, if a referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestatereferendumpetition is filed pursuantto section 1(3) ofarticle V ofthe state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1045 approvedbythepeopleatthegeneralelectiontobeheldinNovember2026approved bythepeople atthe general election to be held inNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date ofofthe the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
____________________________J ____________________________~ Julie McCluskie James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________v ____________________________~ ~ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________APPROVED (Datel andtTh'VY"\. Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis~ GOVERNORVvlft OFz_~t\.<.D2-/e,0\,-l-$ THE0 STATE~ OF(DJte COLORADOand ime) ' PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 26-1045
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Transportation, Housing & Local Government
Sponsors
- Adrienne Benavidez · Cosponsor
- Yara Zokaie · Primary
- Meg Froelich · Cosponsor
- Junie Joseph · Cosponsor
- Mandy Lindsay · Cosponsor
- Javier Mabrey · Cosponsor
- Manny Rutinel · Cosponsor
- Emily Sirota · Cosponsor
- Tammy Story · Cosponsor
- Steven Woodrow · Cosponsor
- M. Weissman · Cosponsor
- K. Wallace · Cosponsor
- J. Marchman · Cosponsor
- C. Kolker · Cosponsor
- I. Jodeh · Cosponsor
- J. Gonzales · Cosponsor
- T. Exum · Cosponsor
- L. Cutter · Cosponsor
- J. Coleman · Cosponsor
- J. Amabile · Cosponsor
- L. García · Cosponsor
- C. Kipp · Primary
- J. Danielson · Primary
- Jennifer Bacon · Cosponsor
- Chad Clifford · Primary
- Kenny Nguyen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 22 co-sponsors · 75 not signed on · 19 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- Yara Zokaie Democrat
- C. Kipp
- J. Danielson
- Chad Clifford Democrat
Co-sponsors (22)
- Adrienne Benavidez
- Meg Froelich Democrat Voted No
- Junie Joseph Democrat
- Mandy Lindsay Democrat Voted No
- Javier Mabrey Democrat
- Manny Rutinel Democrat
- Emily Sirota Democrat
- Tammy Story Democrat
- Steven Woodrow Democrat
- M. Weissman
- K. Wallace
- J. Marchman
- C. Kolker
- I. Jodeh
- J. Gonzales
- T. Exum
- L. Cutter
- J. Coleman
- J. Amabile
- L. García
- Jennifer Bacon Democrat
- Kenny Nguyen Democrat Voted No
Not signed on (75)
75 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 75 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
How each member voted (1)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 1 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 8% | 85% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Amy Paschal | Democrat | Nay |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Nay |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Nay |
| Jacque Phillips | Democrat | Nay |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Nay |
| Kenny Nguyen | Democrat | Nay |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Nay |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Nay |
| Rebekah Stewart | Democrat | Nay |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Yea |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
How each member voted (1)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 23% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Amy Paschal | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Jacque Phillips | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Kenny Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebekah Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Nay |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1045 do?
- The act specifies relevant factors for assessing reasonable accommodations related to assistance animals that may be necessary for an individual with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing under the 'Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act'. Permitting an assistance animal is presumed to be a reasonable accommodation if a housing provider has been given an opportunity to engage in an interactive accommodation process with the individual requesting the accommodation. The act also:Defines 'reasonable accommodation', as it applies to discriminatory housing practices, as an exception or adjustment to a rule, policy, practice, or service that may be necessary for an individual with a disability to have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing, including public and common-use spaces;Defines 'assistance animal' as an animal that does work, performs tasks, assists, or provides therapeutic emotional support to an individual with a disability. 'Assistance animal' includes emotional support animals and service animals.Defines 'emotional support animal' as an animal that provides solely emotional support to an individual to alleviate a symptom or an effect of a disability;Permits a housing provider to request reasonable documentation to support an individual's claim of disability or disability-related need for an assistance animal if the individual's disability or disability-related need is not obvious; andPermits a housing provider, when considering a reasonable accommodation request, to consider documented, specific conduct of an assistance animal that poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others or that causes substantial physical damage to property.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors HB 1045?
- HB 1045 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, Yara Zokaie (Democrat), Meg Froelich (Democrat), Junie Joseph (Democrat), Mandy Lindsay (Democrat), Javier Mabrey (Democrat), Manny Rutinel (Democrat), Emily Sirota (Democrat), Tammy Story (Democrat), Steven Woodrow (Democrat), M. Weissman, K. Wallace, J. Marchman, C. Kolker, I. Jodeh, J. Gonzales, T. Exum, L. Cutter, J. Coleman, J. Amabile, L. García, C. Kipp, J. Danielson, Jennifer Bacon (Democrat), Chad Clifford (Democrat), and Kenny Nguyen (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1045?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1045?
- Track HB 1045 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1045
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1045
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →