Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 3 R · 1 D cosponsors

SB 74 — Clarify Excessive Public Construction Bond Claim Penalty

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on April 06, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 10 sponsors

    4 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (3 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Currently, a contractor on a private construction project has a statutory right to secure payment with a general mechanic's lien. However, if the contractor knowingly files on the lien for an excessive amount, the contractor forfeits all rights to the lien and is liable to the person against whom the lien was filed for costs and attorney fees. A contractor on a public construction project has a similar right to secure payment by filing a verified statement of claim, which requires the project owner to withhold funds sufficient to pay the claim, usually in the form of a bond. The act clarifies that a public construction contractor who knowingly files a verified statement of claim for an excessive amount forfeits all rights pursuant to the verified statement of claim. Thus, the act aligns, for both a private and public construction contractor, the penalty for claiming an excessive amount on a lien or verified statement of claim to the loss of rights related to that lien or verified statement of claim, respectively.     The act expressly allows for a private mechanic's lien or public verified statement of claim to include costs otherwise allowed under a contract in the lien or verified statement of claim amount, including costs incurred as a result of delay, lost productivity, or other disruption to the work. The act also clarifies that an award by a court for an amount less than the amount claimed in a lien or verified statement of claim does not render the amount claimed excessive.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

72 added · 79 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Senate Bill 74 clarify the penalties for claiming an excessive amount in a public construction performance bond dispute. The bill now explicitly outlines who is covered under this provision, including contractors, subcontractors, and other professionals involved in construction work. This change is significant because it aims to protect all parties involved in construction from unfair claims while ensuring that penalties are clearly defined, which can help prevent disputes and promote fairness in public construction projects.

→
Previous
Latest
NOTE:
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
alsoREPRESENTATIVE(S)CamachoandNguyen,Bacon,Carter,Duran, Marshall.
also REPRESENTATIVE(S)CamachoandNguyen, Bacon, Carter, Duran, Marshall.
CONCERNINGCLARIFICATIONOFTHEPENALTYFORCLAIMINGANEXCESSIVE AMOUNT IN A PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND DISPUTE .
CONCERNINGCLARIFICATIONOFTHEPENALTY FORCLAIMINGANEXCESSIVE AMOUNT INA PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND DISPUTE.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
Be it enacted by the GeneralAssembly ofthe State ofColorado:
SECTION1.
SECTION 1.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,38-22-101,amend(1);
InColoradoRevised Statutes, 38-22-10I, amend (1);
Liens in favor of whom - when filed.
Liens in favor ofwhom - when filed.
(1) Every person who furnishes or supplies laborers, machinery, tools, or equipment in the prosecution of the work, and mechanics, materialmen,contractors,subcontractors,builders,andallpersonsofevery class performing labor upon or furnishing directly to the owner or persons furnishinglabor,laborers,ormaterialstobeusedinconstruction,alteration, improvement, addition to, or repair, either in whole or in part, of any building, mill, bridge, ditch, flume, aqueduct, reservoir, tunnel, fence, railroad,wagonroad,tramway,oranyotherstructureorimprovementupon Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
(1) Every person who furnishes or supplies laborers, machinery, tools, or equipment in the prosecution of the work, and mechanics, materialmen, contractors, subcontractors, builders, and all persons ofevery class performing labor upon or furnishing directly to the owner or persons furnishing labor, laborers, ormaterialstobeused inconstruction, alteration, improvement, addition to, or repair, either in whole or in part, of any building, mill, bridge, ditch, flume, aqueduct, reservoir, tunnel, fence, railroad, wagonroad, tramway, or any other structure orimprovementupon Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsfrom existing law andsuch material is notpart of the act.
land, including adjacent curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and also architects, engineers,draftsmen,andartisanswhohavefurnisheddesigns,plans,plats, maps, specifications, drawings, estimates of cost, surveys, or superintendence,orwhohaverenderedotherprofessionalorskilledservice, or bestowed labor in whole or in part, describing or illustrating, or superintending such structure, or work done or to be done, or any part connected therewith, shall have a lien upon the property upon which they have furnished laborers or supplied machinery, tools, or equipment or rendered service or bestowed labor or for which they have furnished materials or mining or milling machinery or other fixtures, for the value, WHETHERDISPUTEDORUNDISPUTED , of such laborers, machinery, tools, or equipment supplied, or services rendered or labor done or laborers or materials furnished, whether at the instance of the owner, or of any other person acting by the owner's authority or under the owner, as agent, contractor, or otherwise for the laborers, machinery, tools, or equipment supplied,orworkorlabordoneorservicesrenderedorlaborersormaterials furnished by each, respectively, whether supplied or done or furnished or renderedattheinstanceof theownerof thebuildingorotherimprovement, or the owner's agent;
land, including adjacent curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and also architects, engineers, draftsmen, and artisanswhohavefurnished designs, plans,plats, maps, specifications, drawings, estimates of cost, surveys, or superintendence,orwhohaverenderedotherprofessionalorskilledservice, or bestowed labor in whole or in part, describing or illustrating, or superintending such structure, or work done or to be done, or any part connected therewith, shall have a lien upon the property upon which they have furnished laborers or supplied machinery, tools, or equipment or rendered service or bestowed labor or for which they have furnished materials or mining or milling machinery or other fixtures, for the value, WHETHERDISPUTEDORUNDISPUTED, ofsuch laborers, machinery' tools, or equipment supplied, or services rendered or labor done or laborers or materials furnished, whether at the instance ofthe owner, or of any other person acting by the owner's authority or under the owner, as agent, contractor, or otherwise for the laborers, machinery, tools, or equipment supplied, orworkor labordone orservicesrenderedor laborers ormaterials furnished by each, respectively, whether supplied or done or furnished or rendered atthe instance ofthe ownerofthe building orotherimprovement, or the owner's agent;
and every contractor, architect, engineer, subcontractor, builder, agent, or other person having charge of the construction, alteration, addition to, or repair, either in whole or in part, of said building or other improvement shall be held to be the agent of the owner for the purposes of this articleTICLE 22.
and every contractor, architect, engineer, subcontractor, builder, agent, or other person having charge of the construction, alteration, addition to, or repair, either in whole or in part, of said building or other improvement shall be held to be the agent of the owner for the purposes ofthis article ARTICLE22.
(7) NOTHINGINTHISARTICLE 22 PROHIBITSTHEINCLUSIONOFCOSTS OTHERWISE ALLOWED UNDER A CONTRACT IN A LIEN , INCLUDING COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF DELAY , LOST PRODUCTIVITY , OR OTHER DISRUPTION TO THE WORK .
(7) NOTHINGINTHISARTICLE22PROHIBITSTHEINCLUSIONOFCOSTS OTHERWISE ALLOWED UNDER ACONTRACT INA LIEN, INCLUDING COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF DELAY, LOST PRODUCTIVITY, OR OTHER DISRUPTIONTOTHEWORK.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,38-22-128,add(2)and (3) as follows:
In ColoradoRevised Statutes, 38-22-128, add (2) and (3) as follows:
(2) AN AWARD BY A COURT HAVING JURISDICTION OF AN AMOUNT THAT IS LESS THAN THE AMOUNT FOR WHICH A PERSON S LIEN WAS FILED DOES NOT RENDER THE AMOUNT EXCESSIVE FOR PURPOSES OF SUBSECTION (1)OFTHISSECTIONIFTHEPERSONHADAGOODFAITHBASISTOBELIEVETHE LIEN AMOUNT WAS DUE AT TIME OF FILING .
(2) ANAWARDBYACOURTHAYINGJURISDICTIONOFANAMOUNT THAT ISLESSTHANTHEAMOUNTFORWHICHAPERSON'S LIENW ASFILED DOESNOTRENDERTHEAMOUNTEXCESSIVEFORPURPOSESOFSUBSECTION (1)OFTHISSECTIONIFTHEPERSONHADAGOODFAITHBASISTOBELIEVETHE LIENAMOUNTW ASDUEATTIMEOFFILING.
PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-074 (3) F OR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION ,AN AMOUNT IS "DUE " IF A PERSON REASONABLY BELIEVES ,IN GOOD FAITH , THAT THE AMOUNT REPRESENTS THE VALUE OF THE LABOR , SERVICES ,EQUIPMENT ,OR OTHER MATERIALS OR PERSONS FURNISHED OR SUPPLIED TO A CONTRACTOR ,AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 38-22-101 (1),WHETHER OR NOT THE AMOUNT IS UNLIQUIDATED OR DISPUTED .
PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-074 (3) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, AN AMOUNT IS "DUE" IF A PERSON REASONABLY BELIEVES, IN GOOD FAITH, THAT THE AMOUNT REPRESENTSTHEVALUEOFTHELABOR, SERVICES, EQUIPMENT, OROTHER MATERIALS ORPERSONS FURNISHEDORSUPPLIEDTOACONTRACTOR, AS DESCRIBEDINSECTION38-22-101 (1), WHETHERORNOTTHEAMOUNT IS UNLIQUIDATEDORDISPUTED.
SECTION3.
SECTION 3.
In ColoradoRevisedStatutes,38-26-107,amend(1) as follows:
In ColoradoRevised Statutes, 38-26-107, amend (1) as follows:
(1) Any person, as defined in section 2-4-401 (8), C.R.S.,at has furnished labor, materials,EQUIPMENT , SERVICES , sustenance, or other suppliesusedorconsumedbyacontractororhisorher THEIRsubcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work whose claim therefor has not been paid by thecontractororthesubcontractor may, at anytime up to and includingthe time of final settlement for the work contracted to be done, file with the board, officer, person, or other contracting bodybywhomthe contract was awarded a verified statement of the amount due and unpaid on account of theclaim, WHETHERTHEAMOUNTISDISPUTEDORUNDISPUTED .N OTHINGIN THISARTICLE 26 PROHIBITSTHE INCLUSIONOFCOSTS OTHERWISE ALLOWED UNDERACONTRACTINAVERIFIEDSTATEMENTOFCLAIM ,INCLUDINGCOSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF DELAY , LOST PRODUCTIVITY , OR OTHER DISRUPTION TO THE WORK .
(1) Any person, as defined in section 2-4-401 (8), C.R.S., that has furnished labor, materials, EQUIPMENT, SERVICES, sustenance, or other supplies used orconsumed byacontractororhis e,her THEIRsubcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution ofthe work whose claim therefor has not been paid by the contractororthe subcontractormay, at any time up to and includingthe time of final settlement for the work contracted to be done, file with the board, officer, person, orothercontracting body bywhom the contractwas awarded a verified statement ofthe amount due and unpaid on account of theclaim, WHETHERTHEAMOUNTISDISPUTEDORUNDISPUTED.NOTHINGIN THIS ARTICLE 26 PROHIBITSTHE INCLUSION OFCOSTS OTHERWISEALLOWED UNDERACONTRACTINAVERIFIEDSTATEMENTOFCLAIM, INCLUDING COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF DELAY, LOST PRODUCTIVITY, OR OTHER DISRUPTIONTOTHE WORK.
If the amount of the contract awarded to the contractor exceeds one hundred fifty thousand dollars, the board, officer, person,orother contracting bodybywhomthecontractwasawardedshall, no later than ten days before the final settlement is made, publish a notice of the final settlement at least twice in a newspaper of general circulation in any county where the work was contracted for or performed or in an electronicmediumapproved bythe executive directorof thedepartmentof personnel.
If the amount of the contract awarded to the contractor exceeds one hundred fifty thousand dollars, the board, officer, person, orother contracting body bywhom the contractwas awarded shall, no later than ten days before the final settlement is made, publish a notice ofthe final settlement at least twice in a newspaper ofgeneral circulation in any county where the work was contracted for or performed or in an electronicmedium approved bythe executive director ofthe department of personnel.
It is unlawful for any person to divide a public works contract into two or more separate contracts for the sole purpose of evading or attempting to evade the requirements of this subsection (1).
It is unlawful for any person to divide a public works contract into two or more separate contracts for the sole purpose of evading or attempting to evade the requirements ofthis subsection (1).
SECTION4.
SECTION 4.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,38-26-110,amend(1) introductory portion;
In ColoradoRevised Statutes, 38-26-110, amend ( 1) introductory portion;
and add (2) and (3) as follows:
andadd (2) and (3) as follows:
(1) Any person who files a verified statement of a claim or asserts a claim against a principal or surety that has furnished a bond under this articleARTICLE 26 for an amount greater than the amount due without a reasonable possibility that the amount claimed is due and with the knowledgethattheamountclaimedisgreaterthantheamountdue,andthat fact is demonstrated in anyproceedingsunderthisarticleARTICLE 26, shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimedFIED STATEMENT OFCLAIM and shall be liable to the following in an amount equal to all costs and all attorneyfeesreasonablyincurredinbonding over, contesting,orotherwise responding in any way to the excessive verified statement of claim or excessive bond claim:
(1) Any person who files a verified statement of a claim or asserts a claim against a principal or surety that has furnished a bond under this articleARTICLE 26 for an amount greater than the amount due without a reasonable possibility that the amount claimed is due and with the knowledge thatthe amount claimed is greaterthan the amountdue, and that fact is demonstrated in any proceedings under this arARTICLE 26, shall forfeit all rights to the amount claVERIFIED STATEMENTOF CLAIM and shall be liable to the following in an amount equal to all costs and all attorney fees reasonably incurred in bonding over, contesting, or otherwise responding in any way to the excessive verified statement of claim or excessive bond claim:
(2) AN AWARD BY A COURT HAVING JURISDICTION OF AN AMOUNT THAT IS LESS THAN THE AMOUNT IN A PERSON 'S VERIFIED STATEMENT OF CLAIM DOES NOT RENDER THAT AMOUNT EXCESSIVE FOR PURPOSES OF SUBSECTION (1)OFTHISSECTIONIFTHEPERSONHADAGOODFAITHBASISTO BELIEVE THE AMOUNT IN THE VERIFIED STATEMENT OF CLAIM WAS DUE AT THE TIME OF FILING.
(2) AN AWARD BY A COURT HAVING JURISDICTION OF AN AMOUNT THAT IS LESS THAN THE AMOUNT IN A PERSON'S VERIFIED STATEMENT OF CLAIM DOES NOT RENDER THAT AMOUNT EXCESSIVE FOR PURPOSES OF SUBSECTION( 1)OFTHISSECTION IFTHE PERSONHADAGOODFAITHBASIS TO BELIEVE THE AMOUNT IN THE VERIFIED STATEMENT OF CLAIM WAS DUE AT THE TIME OF FILING.
(3) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION , AMOUNT DUE " MEANS THE AMOUNT OF MONEY A PERSON REASONABLY BELIEVES , IN GOOD FAITH , REPRESENTS THE VALUE OF THE LABOR ,MATERIALS ,SUSTENANCE , OTHER SUPPLIES, LABORERS , RENTAL MACHINERY , TOOLS , OR EQUIPMENT , FURNISHED OR SUPPLIED TO A CONTRACTOR , AS DEFINED IN SECTION 38-26-101, OR THEIR SUBCONTRACTOR ,WHETHER OR NOT THE AMOUNT IS UNLIQUIDATED OR DISPUTED ,AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 38-26-107 (1).
(3) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "AMOUNT DUE" MEANS THE AMOUNT OF MONEY A PERSON REASONABLY BELIEVES, IN GOOD FAITH, REPRESENTS THE VALUE OF THE LABOR, MATERIALS, SUSTENANCE, OTHER SUPPLIES, LABORERS, RENTAL MACHINERY, TOOLS, OR EQUIPMENT, FURNISHED OR SUPPLIED TO A CONTRACTOR, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 38-26-101, OR THEIR SUBCONTRACTOR, WHETHER OR NOT THE AMOUNT IS UNLIQUIDATED OR DISPUTED, AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 38-26-107 (1).
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiod after final adjournment of the general assembly(August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment ofthe general assembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
except that, if a referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestate constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-074 approvedbythepeopleatthegeneralelectiontobeheldinNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
except that, if a referendumpetition is filed pursuantto section 1(3) ofarticle V ofthe state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-074 approved bythe people atthe general electionto be held inNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date ofthe official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES lier van Mourik ~ ~ Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED on Y\'\c:1\8\prl--t' io'tvlo..\r.OOowY\ (bate and Time) ESTATE OF COLORADO PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 26-074
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 26-074
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Sent to the Governor

  3. Signed by the President of the Senate

  4. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  5. Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass

  6. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  7. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee

  8. House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  9. House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

  10. Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

  11. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  12. Senate Third Reading Laid Over to 02/17/2026 - No Amendments

  13. Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments

  14. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole

  15. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

Sponsors

  • John Carson · Primary
  • Marc Snyder · Primary
  • Larry Liston · Cosponsor
  • Rod Pelton · Cosponsor
  • B. Marshall · Cosponsor
  • M. Duran · Cosponsor
  • M. Carter · Cosponsor
  • J. Bacon · Cosponsor
  • K. Nguyen · Primary
  • S. Camacho · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (6)

Not signed on (91)

91 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 91 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

CONCUR

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 20001
Republican 10000
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 35001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Not Voting
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea
Marc Catlin Republican Yea
Mark Baisley Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

REPASS

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 20001
Republican 10000
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 35001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Not Voting
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea
Marc Catlin Republican Yea
Mark Baisley Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 7000
Republican 3001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Yea
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Yea
Lorena Garcia Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Not Voting
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Rebecca Keltie Republican Yea
Scott Slaugh Republican Yea

Official roll call →

BILL

Passed 30 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 17003
Republican 9001
Unaffiliated 4001
Total 30005
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (35)
Member Party Vote
District 21 — Not Voting
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Not Voting
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Not Voting
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Not Voting
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea
Marc Catlin Republican Not Voting
Mark Baisley Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 2000
Democrat 5000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 74 do?
Currently, a contractor on a private construction project has a statutory right to secure payment with a general mechanic's lien. However, if the contractor knowingly files on the lien for an excessive amount, the contractor forfeits all rights to the lien and is liable to the person against whom the lien was filed for costs and attorney fees. A contractor on a public construction project has a similar right to secure payment by filing a verified statement of claim, which requires the project owner to withhold funds sufficient to pay the claim, usually in the form of a bond. The act clarifies that a public construction contractor who knowingly files a verified statement of claim for an excessive amount forfeits all rights pursuant to the verified statement of claim. Thus, the act aligns, for both a private and public construction contractor, the penalty for claiming an excessive amount on a lien or verified statement of claim to the loss of rights related to that lien or verified statement of claim, respectively.     The act expressly allows for a private mechanic's lien or public verified statement of claim to include costs otherwise allowed under a contract in the lien or verified statement of claim amount, including costs incurred as a result of delay, lost productivity, or other disruption to the work. The act also clarifies that an award by a court for an amount less than the amount claimed in a lien or verified statement of claim does not render the amount claimed excessive.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors SB 74?
SB 74 is sponsored by John Carson (Republican), Marc Snyder (Democrat), Larry Liston (Republican), Rod Pelton (Republican), B. Marshall, M. Duran, M. Carter, J. Bacon, K. Nguyen, and S. Camacho.
What is the current status of SB 74?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 28, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 74?
Track SB 74 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 74

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 74

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →