Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted 12 D cosponsors

HB 1017 — Criminal Restitution Prohibited for Insurers

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on April 02, 2026.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 18 sponsors

    3 primary, 15 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (12 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

For the purpose of criminal restitution, the act excludes from the definition of 'restitution' losses for which a victim may be compensated through a private insurance policy, except for worker's compensation insurance. Current law defines a 'victim' as any person who has suffered losses because of a contractual relationship, including an insurance company. The act excludes a person from the definition of 'victim' because of a contractual relationship but clarifies that an insurance company is a 'victim' if the insurance company is a victim of a scheme to defraud the insurance company or when the insurance company's property is damaged or stolen through a criminal act. The act authorizes the court to award a victim restitution for a deductible amount under the victim's insurance policy. The act does not prohibit an insurance company from filing a civil action or pursuing any other civil action against a defendant to recover losses the insurance company has suffered.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

160 added · 190 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of HB 1017 includes additional language clarifying that when an insurance company compensates a crime victim, it is part of a contractual agreement where the victim pays a premium. This change highlights that the insurer's payment is separate from the restitution process, which can impact how restitution is handled in criminal cases. This distinction is important because it prevents insurance companies from receiving restitution funds meant for victims, ensuring that victims are fully compensated for their losses.

→
Previous
Latest
Second Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
NOTE:
26-0424.01 Shelby Ross x4510 HOUSE BILL 26-1017 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Espenoza and Zokaie, Bacon, Boesenecker, Lindsay, Mabrey, Martinez, McCluskie, Nguyen, Paschal, Sirota, Woodrow SENATE SPONSORSHIP Weissman, Coleman, Gonzales J., Jodeh, Kipp, Wallace e n e 2 E a 2 A U 7, N g 1 S d hr House Committees Senate Committees e a Judiciary Judiciary R M r e A BILL FOR AN ACT n 6 m 0 C ONCERNING PROHIBITING AN INSURER FROM RECEIVING T n , N U 1 RESTITUTION THROUGH THE CRIMINAL RESTITUTION PROCESS .
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
E i c S a a R M Bill Summary n (Note:
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill e n 2 passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that m 2 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at E n 5 U U 2 http://leg.colorado.gov.) O i a H a r R e For the purpose of criminal restitution, current law defines a r F "victim" as any person who has suffered losses because of a contractual 3 relationship, including an insurer.
HOUSE BILL 26-1017 BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Espenoza and Zokaie, Bacon, Boesenecker, Lindsay, Mabrey, Martinez, Nguyen, Paschal, Sirota, Woodrow, McCluskie;
The bill excludes an insurer from the definition of "victim" and instead authorizes an insurer to file a civil g 6 action against the offender to recover losses if the insurer has suffered d 0 because of a contractual relationship with the victim.
also SENATOR(S) Weissman, Gonzales J., Jodeh, Kipp, Wallace, Coleman.
E e , S R 2 U d r H 2 u Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
CONCERNING PROHIBITING AN INSURER FROM RECEIVING RESTITUTION THROUGH THE CRIMINAL RESTITUTION PROCESS .
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
e b Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n F Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
SECTION1.
e A Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,18-1.3-601,add(1)(h) as follows:
SECTION 1.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-1.3-601, add (1)(h) as follows:
(h) A N INSURANCE COMPANY , AS PART OF ITS BUSINESS OPERATIONS ,COMPENSATES A DIRECT VICTIM OF A CRIME DUE TO THE CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE INSURANCE COMPANY AND VICTIMWHEREBYTHEVICTIMPAYSTHEINSURANCECOMPANYAPREMIUM AND THE INSURANCE COMPANY COMPENSATES THE VICTIM FOR LOSSES SUSTAINED.INTHESEINSTANCES ,CRIMINALRESTITUTIONTOMAKEDIRECT VICTIMS WHOLE MUST BE PRIORITIZED,WHILE INSURANCE COMPANIES SHOULD RECOVER THEIR LOSSES THROUGH REMEDIES OTHER THAN CRIMINAL RESTITUTION ORDERS.
(h) ANINSURANCECOMPANY ASPARTOFITSBUSINESSOPERATIONS , COMPENSATES A DIRECT VICTIM OF A CRIME DUE TO THE CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE INSURANCE COMPANY AND VICTIM WHEREBY THE VICTIM PAYS THE INSURANCE COMPANY A PREMIUM AND THE ________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
HOWEVER ,AN INSURANCE COMPANY THATISADIRECTVICTIMOFACRIMEMUSTBEMADEWHOLETHROUGHTHE CRIMINALRESTITUTIONPROCESS ,INCLUDINGIFTHEINSURANCECOMPANY ISAVICTIMOFASCHEMETODEFRAUDTHEINSURANCECOMPANYORWHEN THE INSURANCE COMPANY 'S PROPERTY IS DAMAGED OR STOLEN BY CRIMINAL ACTS.
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
INSURANCECOMPANYCOMPENSATESTHEVICTIMFORLOSSESSUSTAINED .IN THESEINSTANCES ,CRIMINALRESTITUTIONTOMAKEDIRECTVICTIMSWHOLE MUST BE PRIORITIZED ,WHILE INSURANCE COMPANIES SHOULD RECOVER THEIR LOSSES THROUGH REMEDIES OTHER THAN CRIMINAL RESTITUTION ORDERS .H OWEVER ,AN INSURANCE COMPANY THAT IS A DIRECT VICTIM OF A CRIME MUST BE MADE WHOLE THROUGH THE CRIMINAL RESTITUTION PROCESS ,INCLUDINGIFTHEINSURANCECOMPANYISAVICTIMOFASCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE INSURANCE COMPANY OR WHEN THE INSURANCE COMPANY 'S PROPERTY IS DAMAGED OR STOLEN BY CRIMINAL ACTS .
(3)(a) "Restitution"meansanypecuniarylosssufferedbyavictim and includes, but is not limited to, all out-of-pocket expenses, interest, loss of use of money, anticipated future expenses, rewards paid by -2- 1017 victims,moneyadvancedbylawenforcementagencies,moneyadvanced byagovernmentalagencyforaserviceanimal,adjustmentexpenses,and other losses or injuries proximately caused by an offender's conduct and that can be reasonably calculated and recompensed in money.
(3) (a) "Restitution" means anypecuniary loss suffered by a victim and includes, but is not limited to, all out-of-pocket expenses, interest, loss of use of money, anticipated future expenses, rewards paid by victims, money advanced by law enforcement agencies, money advanced by a governmental agencyfor a service animal, adjustment expenses, and other losses or injuries proximatelycaused byan offender's conduct and that can bereasonablycalculatedandrecompensedinmoney."Restitution"doesnot include LOSSES FOR WHICH A VICTIM MAY BE COMPENSATED THROUGH A PRIVATE INSURANCE POLICY , damages for physical or mental pain and suffering, loss of consortium, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of future earnings, or punitive damages.
"Restitution" does not incluLOSSES FOR WHICH A VICTIM MAY BE COMPENSATED THROUGH A PRIVATE INSURANCE POLICY , damages for physical or mental pain and suffering, loss of consortium, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of future earnings, or punitive damages.
(d) "Restitution"shallalsoincludeLSOINCLUDES costsincurredby agovernmentalagencyor AWORKER SCOMPENSATION insurerthatprovides medical benefits, health benefits, or nonmedical support services directly related to a medical or health condition to a victim for losses or injuries proximatelycaused byan offender's conduct, including, but not limited to, costsincurredbymedicaid, MEDICARE ,andothercareprogramsforindigent persons.
(d) "Restitution"shallalsoinclALSOINCLUDES costsincurred by a governmental agency oA WORKER 'S COMPENSATION insurer that providesmedicalbenefits,healthbenefits,ornonmedicalsupportservices directly related to a medical or health condition to a victim for losses or injuries proximately caused by an offender's conduct, including, but not limited to, costs incurred by medicaiMEDICARE , and other care programs for indigent persons.
(4) (a) "Victim" means any person aggrieved by the conduct of an offender and includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(4)(a) "Victim"meansanypersonaggrievedbytheconductofan offender and includes, but is not limited to, the following:
PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 26-1017 (I) Any person against whom any felony, misdemeanor, petty OFFENSE ,ortrafficmisdemeanoroffensehasbeenperpetratedorattempted, INCLUDING AN INSURANCE COMPANY WHEN THE INSURANCE COMPANY IS A VICTIM OFA SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE INSURANCE COMPANY OR WHEN THE INSURANCE COMPANY 'S PROPERTY IS DAMAGED OR STOLEN THROUGH A CRIMINAL ACT ;
(I) Any person against whom any felony, misdemeanor, petty OFFENSE , or traffic misdemeanor offense has been perpetrated or attempted,INCLUDING AN INSURANCE COMPANY WHEN THE INSURANCE COMPANY IS A VICTIM OF A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE INSURANCE COMPANY OR WHEN THE INSURANCE COMPANY S PROPERTY IS DAMAGED OR STOLEN THROUGH A CRIMINAL ACT;
(III) Any person who has suffered losses because of a contractual relationship with, including but not limited to, an insurer, or because of liabilityunderPURSUANTTO section14-6-110C.R.S.,forapersondescribed in subparagraph (I) or (II) of this paragraph (a)SUBSECTION (4)(a)(I)OR (4)(a)(II)OF THIS SECTION ;
(III) Anypersonwhohassufferedlossesbecause of a contractual relationship with, including but not limited to, an insurer, or because of liability undePURSUANT TO section 14-6-110 C.R.S., for a person described in subparagraph (I) or (II) of this paraSUBSECTION -3- 1017 (4)(a)(IOR (4)(a)(IIOF THIS SECTION;
(VI) Any person who had to expend resources for the purposes described in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of subsection (3) of this section SUBSECTIONS (3)(b), (3)(c),OR (3)(d) OF THIS SECTION , EXCEPT NOT AN INSURANCECOMPANYTHATCOMPENSATEDAVICTIMFORALOSS ,EXCEPTAS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (3)(d)OF THIS SECTION .
(VI) Any person who had to expend resources for the purposes described in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of subsection (3) of this section SUBSECTIONS (3)(b), (3)(cOR (3)(d)OF THIS SECTION,EXCEPT NOT AN INSURANCECOMPANYTHAT COMPENSATEDAVICTIMFORALOSS ,EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (3)(d)OF THIS SECTION.
SECTION3.
SECTION 3.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,18-1.3-603,amend(8);
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-1.3-603, amend (8);
(8) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section,foranon-felonyconvictionundertitle42,C.R.S.,Thecourtshall orderrestitutionconcerningonlytheportionofthevictim'specuniaryloss for which the victimcannot be compensated under a policyof insurance, self-insurance, an indemnity agreement, or a risk management fund.
(8) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, for a non-felony conviction under title 42, C.R.S., The court shall order restitution concerning only the portion of the victim's pecuniary loss for which the victim cannot be compensated under a policy of insurance, self-insurance, an indemnity agreement, or a risk management fund.
(b) Thecourt,indeterminingtherestitutionamount,shallconsider whether the defendant or the vehicle driven by the defendant at the time of the offense was covered by:
(b) The court, in determining the restitution amount, shall consider whether the defendant or the vehicle driven bythe defendant at the time of the offense was covered by:
(I) Acomplyingpolicyofinsuranceorcertificateofself-insurance as required by the laws of this state;
(I) A complying policyof insurance or certificate of self-insurance as required by the laws of this state;
(II) Self-insuranceincludingbutnotlimitedtoinsurancecoverage pursuant to the provisions of part 15 of article 30 of title 24, C.R.S.;
(II) Self-insurance including but not limited to insurance coverage PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1017 pursuant to the provisions of part 15 of article 30 of title 24, C.R.S.;
(c) (I) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (c), a court may not award restitution to a victim concerning a pecuniary loss for -4- 1017 which the victim has received or is entitled to receive benefits or reimbursementunderapolicyofinsuranceorotherindemnityagreement.
(c) (I) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (c), a court maynotawardrestitutiontoavictimconcerningapecuniarylossforwhich the victim has received or is entitled to receive benefits or reimbursement under a policy of insurance or other indemnity agreement.
(B) (Deleted byamendment, L.
(B) (Deleted by amendment, L.
904, § 28, effective May 21, 2004.) (d) (I) (Deleted by amendment, L.
904, § 28, effective May 21, 2004.) (d)(I) (Deletedbyamendment,L.2004,p.904,§28,effectiveMay 21, 2004.) (II) (b) Nothing in this paragraph (d) shall HIS SECTION DOES NOT prohibit a nonowner driver or passenger in the A vehicle from being awarded restitution if theNONOWNER driver or passenger was not covered by his or her THE NONOWNER DRIVER 'S OR PASSENGER 'S own medical payments coverage policy.
2004, p.
(e) (I)(c) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, an insurance company, risk management fund, or public entity shall not be IS NOT obligatedtodefendadefendantinahearingconcerningrestitution.No A court shall NOT interpret an indemnity or insurance contract so as to obligate AS REQUIRING an insurance company, risk management fund, or public entityto defend a defendant at a restitution hearing absent a specific agreement.
904, § 28, effective May 21, 2004.) (II)(b) Nothinginthisparagraph(d)shallHISSECTIONDOESNOT prohibit a nonowner driver or passenger in tAevehicle from being awardedrestitutionifthNONOWNER driverorpassengerwasnotcovered by his or heTHE NONOWNER DRIVER S OR PASSENGER 'S own medical payments coverage policy.
(II) Notwithstanding any provision of law, indemnity contract, or insurancecontracttothecontrary,aninsurancecompany,riskmanagement fund, or public entity shall not be obligated to pay or otherwise satisfy a civil judgment entered pursuant to this part 6, or to indemnify a defendant for an amount awarded in a restitution order.
(e) (I) (c) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, an insurance company, risk management fund, or public entity shall not be IS NOT obligated to defend a defendant in a hearing concerning restitution.
(f) Nothing in this article shall be construed to limit or abrogate the PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1017 rights and immunities set forth in the "Colorado Governmental Immunity Act", article 10 of title 24, C.R.S.
No A court shNOT interpret an indemnity or insurance contract so as to obligaAS REQUIRING an insurance company, risk management fund, or public entity to defend a defendant at a restitution hearing absent a specific agreement.
(g)(d) TheprovisionsofThissubsection(8)shall DOES notpreclude thecourt,pursuanttoarticle4.1oftitle24,C.R.S.,fromorderingrestitution to reimburse an expenditure made by a victim compensation fund.
(II) Notwithstandinganyprovisionof law,indemnitycontract, or insurance contract to the contrary, an insurance company, risk management fund, or public entity shall not be obligated to pay or otherwise satisfy a civil judgment entered pursuant to this part 6, or to indemnify a defendant for an amount awarded in a restitution order.
(12) THISPART 6DOESNOTPREVENTANINSURANCECOMPANYFROM FILING A CIVIL ACTION OR PURSUING ANY OTHER CIVIL REMEDY AGAINST A DEFENDANT TO RECOVER LOSSES THE INSURANCE COMPANY SUFFERED .
(f) Nothing in this article shall be construed to limit or abrogate the rights and immunities set forth in the "Colorado Governmental -5- 1017 Immunity Act", article 10 of title 24, C.R.S.
(13) THIS PART 6 DOES NOT LIMIT OR ABROGATE THE RIGHTS AND IMMUNITIES SET FORTH IN THE "C OLORADO GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY A CT",ARTICLE 10 OF TITLE 24.
(g) (d) The provisions of This subsection (8) DOESlnot preclude the court, pursuant to article 4.1 of title 24, C.R.S., from ordering restitution to reimburse an expenditure made by a victim compensation fund.
(12) THIS PART6 DOES NOT PREVENT AN INSURANCE COMPANY FROM FILING A CIVIL ACTION OR PURSUING ANY OTHER CIVIL REMEDY AGAINST A DEFENDANT TO RECOVER LOSSES THE INSURANCE COMPANY SUFFERED .
(13) THIS PAR6 DOES NOT LIMIT OR ABROGATE THE RIGHTS AND IMMUNITIES SET FORTH IN TH"COLORADO GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY A CT",ARTICLE10 OF TITL24.
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiodafterfinaladjournmentofthegeneralassembly(August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiod after final adjournment of the general assembly(August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
Show all 44 changed rows (4 more)
Previous
Latest
except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
except that, if a referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestate constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 26-1017 approvedbythepeopleatthegeneralelectiontobeheldinNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
-6- 1017
____________________________ ____________________________ Julie McCluskie James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________ ____________________________ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 6-HOUSE BILL 26-1017
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the President of the Senate

  3. Sent to the Governor

  4. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  5. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments

  7. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/16/2026 - No Amendments

  8. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/13/2026 - No Amendments

  9. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  10. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

  11. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  12. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Floor

  13. House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  14. House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

  15. Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 83 not signed on · 14 voted No

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (15)

Not signed on (83)

83 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 83 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

BILL

Passed 23 Yea · 12 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 20001
Republican 01000
Unaffiliated 3200
Total 231201
% of votes cast 64%33%0%3%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Nay
Pelton R. — Nay
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Not Voting
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Nay
Cleave Simpson Republican Nay
Janice Rich Republican Nay
John Carson Republican Nay
Larry Liston Republican Nay
Lisa Frizell Republican Nay
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Nay
Marc Catlin Republican Nay
Mark Baisley Republican Nay
Scott Bright Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 7000
Republican 0400
Total 7400
% of votes cast 64%36%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Yea
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Yea
Lorena Garcia Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Nay
Matt Soper Republican Nay
Rebecca Keltie Republican Nay
Scott Slaugh Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1017 do?
For the purpose of criminal restitution, the act excludes from the definition of 'restitution' losses for which a victim may be compensated through a private insurance policy, except for worker's compensation insurance. Current law defines a 'victim' as any person who has suffered losses because of a contractual relationship, including an insurance company. The act excludes a person from the definition of 'victim' because of a contractual relationship but clarifies that an insurance company is a 'victim' if the insurance company is a victim of a scheme to defraud the insurance company or when the insurance company's property is damaged or stolen through a criminal act. The act authorizes the court to award a victim restitution for a deductible amount under the victim's insurance policy. The act does not prohibit an insurance company from filing a civil action or pursuing any other civil action against a defendant to recover losses the insurance company has suffered.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors HB 1017?
HB 1017 is sponsored by K. Wallace, C. Kipp, I. Jodeh, J. Gonzales, J. Coleman, Cecelia Espenoza (Democrat), Yara Zokaie (Democrat), Andrew Boesenecker (Democrat), Mandy Lindsay (Democrat), M. Weissman, Javier Mabrey (Democrat), Matthew Martinez (Democrat), Julie McCluskie (Democrat), Kenny Nguyen (Democrat), Emily Sirota (Democrat), Steven Woodrow (Democrat), Jennifer Bacon (Democrat), and Amy Paschal (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1017?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 1017?
Track HB 1017 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1017

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1017

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →