HB 1417 — Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act Testing Entities
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 20, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on June 04, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
25 sponsors
4 primary, 21 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (15 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill updates definitions and requirements for testing entities to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
The bill expands the definition of 'testing entity' to include more organizations that offer exams or courses, ensuring they accommodate individuals with disabilities. It mandates that these entities provide accessible testing environments or alternatives for those who require accommodations.
What this means for you
- Workers: This means workers with disabilities may have better access to necessary exams for career advancement.
- Families: Families of individuals with disabilities may find it easier for their loved ones to pursue education and certification opportunities.
Summary
Current law requires a testing entity to provide accommodations for an individual with a disability who is taking an exam for professional licensing. The current definition of 'testing entity' includes a private entity or a state or local governmental entity offering such an exam and having control over testing accommodation decisions. The act changes the definition of 'testing entity' to include any person, business, or state or local government agency that offers an examination or course related to an application, license, certification, or credential for secondary or postsecondary education, professional, or trade purposes. The act further requires a testing entity to offer the exam or course in a place and manner that is accessible to an individual with a disability or offer an alternative accessible arrangement in order to accommodate an individual with a disability who has met the requirements to receive the accommodation.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
37 added · 45 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of HB 1417 emphasizes the importance of providing disability-related accommodations for testing entities, which include both private and governmental organizations that administer exams for professional or educational purposes. Notable changes include clearer definitions of what constitutes a testing entity and affirming that failures to accommodate individuals with disabilities may lead to legal action. These updates aim to ensure equitable access to assessments, promoting fair assessment conditions for all individuals, regardless of disabilities. This matters because it helps create a more inclusive environment that recognizes the capabilities of individuals rather than allowing systemic barriers to hinder access and opportunities.
NOTE:
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
also·also SENATOR(S) Roberts and Rich, Daugherty, Exum, Jodeh, Kipp, Kolker, Marchman, Coleman.
CCONCERNINGTHE ONCERNINGTHEDISABILITYDISABILITY-RELATEDACCOMMODATION -RELATEDACCOMMODATIONREQUIREMENTOFREQUIREMENT OF A TESTING ENTITYENTITY. .
Be it enacted by the GeneralGeneralAssembly Assemblyofthe of the State ofofColorado: Colorado:
Denial ofofequitable equitable access to these assessments undermines the promise of equal opportunity and perpetuates systemic inequities.
These barriers may ________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsdeletionsfrom from existing law andandsuch such material is notnotpart part of the act.
Such barriers do not reflect an individual's knowledge or ability, but rather the failure ofofsystems systems to provide equitable access.
(c) Reasonable accommodations are essential to ensuring fairness, notadvantage.Accommodationssuchasextendedtime,alternativeformats,notadvantage. assistive technology, and accessible testing environments are necessary to level the playing field and ensure that examinations measure aptitude and achievement rather than the impact of a disability.
Accommodationssuchasextendedtime, alternativeformats, assistive technology, and accessible testing environments are necessary to level the playing field and ensure that examinations measure aptitude and achievement rather than the impact ofa disability.
These protections are essential to preventing exclusionarypracticesexclusionary practices and ensuring consistent access across institutions and jurisdictions.
(e) The erosion or inadequate enforcement of these protections threatensequalaccess.Withoutstrongstatutorysafeguardsandmeaningfulthreatens enforcement,equal individualsaccess. with disabilities may be denied opportunities, discouraged from participation, or forced to navigate inconsistent and burdensome processes to secure basic accommodations.
Withoutstrongstatutorysafeguards and meaningful enforcement, individuals with disabilities may be denied opportunities, discouraged from participation, or forced to navigate inconsistent and burdensome processes to secure basic accommodations.
When barriers are removed, individuals with disabilities are better able to contribute their talents, perspectives, and expertise to the workforce,civiclife,andbroadercommunity.Inclusivesystemsstrengthenworkforce, economiccivic growth,life, innovation,andbroadercommunity. and social equity.
(g)Inclusivesystemsstrengthen Iteconomic isgrowth, thereforeinnovation, the intent of the general assembly to affirm and strengthensocial protectionsequity. that guarantee equal access to examinations.
(g) It is therefore the intent ofthe general assembly to affirm and strengthen protections that guarantee equal access to examinations.
(h) In a recent District Court decision,decisionCatherine Catherine Dunn V.
The decision to grant a preliminary injunction does not address section 24-34-806, which clearly states that failure to accommodate is a proper cause ofofaction. action.
(2) The general assembly further finds and declares that it is the general assembly's intent that the National Board ofofMedical Medical Examiners is a covered entity inin·this this context, and that it is necessary to amend section 24-34-806 to align with 42 U.S.C.
Testing accommodations for Coloradans with disabilities - right ofofaction action - legislative declaration - definitions.
(c) "Testing entity" means a private entityenticy ofofthis this state orm a statestate01 or local governmentalgovemmental entity of this state that offersoff-ets an exam relatedIelated to licensing orm certification forfox professionalprnfessional01 ortxade tradeputposes purposes and has controlcontrnl overtestingaccommodationdecisions.vet testingaccommodationdecisions.
ANYPERSONANY ,BUSINESSPERSON, ,ORSTATEORBUSINESS, ORSTATEOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY THAT OFFERS EXAMINATIONS OR COURSES RELATEDTOAPPLICATIONSRELATEDTOAPPLICATIONS, ,LICENSINGLICENSING, ,CERTIFICATIONCERTIFICATION, ,ORCREDENTIALINGORCREDENTIALING FORSECONDARYORPOSTSECONDARYEDUCATIONFORSECONDARYORPOSTSECONDARYEDUCATION,ORFORPROFESSIONALOR ,ORFORPROFESSIONALOR TRADE PURPOSESPURPOSES. .
(3) (a) A testing entity mustOFFERmust OFFER EXAMINATIONS OR COURSES IN A PLACE AND MANNER ACCESSIBLE TO INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES OR MUST OFFER ALTERNATIVE ACCESSIBLE ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH INDIVIDUALSANDINDIVIDUALS grantanindividual'srequestforatestingaccommodationAND grantan individual'srequestfor atestingaccommodation on a licensing exam ififthe the individual:
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiodninety-day period after final adjournment ofofthe the general assembly(Augustassembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
except that, if a referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestatereferendum petition is filed pursuantto section 1(3) ofarticle V ofthe state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1417 approvedbythepeopleatthegeneralelectiontobeheldinNovember2026approved bythepeople at the general electionto be held inNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date ofofthe the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
____________________________J ____________________________u Juliel McCluskie~ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________v ____________________________~ ~ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________APPROVED (Date°"'~ J ~ ~~ 4f,,'2.02JIo d12..~OpM (Dat and Time) _________________________________________DO JaredPAGE S.4-HOUSE BILL 26-1417
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1417
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Education Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Education
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Education Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Education
Sponsors
- J. Marchman · Cosponsor
- C. Kolker · Cosponsor
- C. Kipp · Cosponsor
- I. Jodeh · Cosponsor
- T. Exum · Cosponsor
- L. Daugherty · Cosponsor
- J. Coleman · Cosponsor
- D. Roberts · Primary
- J. Rich · Primary
- Jennifer Bacon · Primary
- Matt Soper · Primary
- Andrew Boesenecker · Cosponsor
- Monica Duran · Cosponsor
- Meg Froelich · Cosponsor
- Lori Goldstein · Cosponsor
- Eliza Hamrick · Cosponsor
- Jamie Jackson · Cosponsor
- Sheila Lieder · Cosponsor
- Kenny Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Jacque Phillips · Cosponsor
- Naquetta Ricks · Cosponsor
- Manny Rutinel · Cosponsor
- Katie Stewart · Cosponsor
- Tammy Story · Cosponsor
- Karen McCormick · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 21 co-sponsors · 76 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- D. Roberts
- J. Rich
- Jennifer Bacon Democrat
- Matt Soper Republican
Co-sponsors (21)
- J. Marchman
- C. Kolker
- C. Kipp
- I. Jodeh
- T. Exum
- L. Daugherty
- J. Coleman
- Andrew Boesenecker Democrat
- Monica Duran Democrat
- Meg Froelich Democrat
- Lori Goldstein Democrat
- Eliza Hamrick Democrat
- Jamie Jackson Democrat
- Sheila Lieder Democrat
- Kenny Nguyen Democrat
- Jacque Phillips Democrat
- Naquetta Ricks Democrat
- Manny Rutinel Democrat
- Katie Stewart Democrat
- Tammy Story Democrat
- Karen McCormick Democrat
Not signed on (76)
76 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 76 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Garcia Sander | — | Yea |
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsay Gilchrist | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew Martinez | Democrat | Yea |
| Meghan Lukens | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Yea |
| Dusty Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1417 do?
- Current law requires a testing entity to provide accommodations for an individual with a disability who is taking an exam for professional licensing. The current definition of 'testing entity' includes a private entity or a state or local governmental entity offering such an exam and having control over testing accommodation decisions. The act changes the definition of 'testing entity' to include any person, business, or state or local government agency that offers an examination or course related to an application, license, certification, or credential for secondary or postsecondary education, professional, or trade purposes. The act further requires a testing entity to offer the exam or course in a place and manner that is accessible to an individual with a disability or offer an alternative accessible arrangement in order to accommodate an individual with a disability who has met the requirements to receive the accommodation.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors HB 1417?
- HB 1417 is sponsored by J. Marchman, C. Kolker, C. Kipp, I. Jodeh, T. Exum, L. Daugherty, J. Coleman, D. Roberts, J. Rich, Jennifer Bacon (Democrat), Matt Soper (Republican), Andrew Boesenecker (Democrat), Monica Duran (Democrat), Meg Froelich (Democrat), Lori Goldstein (Democrat), Eliza Hamrick (Democrat), Jamie Jackson (Democrat), Sheila Lieder (Democrat), Kenny Nguyen (Democrat), Jacque Phillips (Democrat), Naquetta Ricks (Democrat), Manny Rutinel (Democrat), Katie Stewart (Democrat), Tammy Story (Democrat), and Karen McCormick (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1417?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 20, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1417?
- Track HB 1417 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1417
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1417
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →