Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 15 D · 1 R cosponsors

HB 1417 — Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act Testing Entities

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 20, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on June 04, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 25 sponsors

    4 primary, 21 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (15 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill updates definitions and requirements for testing entities to accommodate individuals with disabilities.

The bill expands the definition of 'testing entity' to include more organizations that offer exams or courses, ensuring they accommodate individuals with disabilities. It mandates that these entities provide accessible testing environments or alternatives for those who require accommodations.

What this means for you
  • Workers: This means workers with disabilities may have better access to necessary exams for career advancement.
  • Families: Families of individuals with disabilities may find it easier for their loved ones to pursue education and certification opportunities.

Summary

Current law requires a testing entity to provide accommodations for an individual with a disability who is taking an exam for professional licensing. The current definition of 'testing entity' includes a private entity or a state or local governmental entity offering such an exam and having control over testing accommodation decisions.     The act changes the definition of 'testing entity' to include any person, business, or state or local government agency that offers an examination or course related to an application, license, certification, or credential for secondary or postsecondary education, professional, or trade purposes. The act further requires a testing entity to offer the exam or course in a place and manner that is accessible to an individual with a disability or offer an alternative accessible arrangement in order to accommodate an individual with a disability who has met the requirements to receive the accommodation.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

37 added · 45 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of HB 1417 emphasizes the importance of providing disability-related accommodations for testing entities, which include both private and governmental organizations that administer exams for professional or educational purposes. Notable changes include clearer definitions of what constitutes a testing entity and affirming that failures to accommodate individuals with disabilities may lead to legal action. These updates aim to ensure equitable access to assessments, promoting fair assessment conditions for all individuals, regardless of disabilities. This matters because it helps create a more inclusive environment that recognizes the capabilities of individuals rather than allowing systemic barriers to hinder access and opportunities.

→
Previous
Latest
NOTE:
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
also SENATOR(S) Roberts and Rich, Daugherty, Exum, Jodeh, Kipp, Kolker, Marchman, Coleman.
·also SENATOR(S) Roberts and Rich, Daugherty, Exum, Jodeh, Kipp, Kolker, Marchman, Coleman.
C ONCERNINGTHEDISABILITY -RELATEDACCOMMODATIONREQUIREMENTOF A TESTING ENTITY .
CONCERNINGTHE DISABILITY-RELATEDACCOMMODATION REQUIREMENT OF A TESTING ENTITY.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
Be it enacted by the GeneralAssembly ofthe State ofColorado:
Denial of equitable access to these assessments undermines the promise of equal opportunity and perpetuates systemic inequities.
Denial ofequitable access to these assessments undermines the promise of equal opportunity and perpetuates systemic inequities.
These barriers may ________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
These barriers may Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsfrom existing law andsuch material is notpart of the act.
Such barriers do not reflect an individual's knowledge or ability, but rather the failure of systems to provide equitable access.
Such barriers do not reflect an individual's knowledge or ability, but rather the failure ofsystems to provide equitable access.
(c) Reasonable accommodations are essential to ensuring fairness, notadvantage.Accommodationssuchasextendedtime,alternativeformats, assistive technology, and accessible testing environments are necessary to level the playing field and ensure that examinations measure aptitude and achievement rather than the impact of a disability.
(c) Reasonable accommodations are essential to ensuring fairness, notadvantage.
Accommodationssuchasextendedtime, alternativeformats, assistive technology, and accessible testing environments are necessary to level the playing field and ensure that examinations measure aptitude and achievement rather than the impact ofa disability.
These protections are essential to preventing exclusionarypractices and ensuring consistent access across institutions and jurisdictions.
These protections are essential to preventing exclusionary practices and ensuring consistent access across institutions and jurisdictions.
(e) The erosion or inadequate enforcement of these protections threatensequalaccess.Withoutstrongstatutorysafeguardsandmeaningful enforcement, individuals with disabilities may be denied opportunities, discouraged from participation, or forced to navigate inconsistent and burdensome processes to secure basic accommodations.
(e) The erosion or inadequate enforcement of these protections threatens equal access.
Withoutstrongstatutorysafeguards and meaningful enforcement, individuals with disabilities may be denied opportunities, discouraged from participation, or forced to navigate inconsistent and burdensome processes to secure basic accommodations.
When barriers are removed, individuals with disabilities are better able to contribute their talents, perspectives, and expertise to the workforce,civiclife,andbroadercommunity.Inclusivesystemsstrengthen economic growth, innovation, and social equity.
When barriers are removed, individuals with disabilities are better able to contribute their talents, perspectives, and expertise to the workforce, civic life, andbroadercommunity.
(g) It is therefore the intent of the general assembly to affirm and strengthen protections that guarantee equal access to examinations.
Inclusivesystemsstrengthen economic growth, innovation, and social equity.
(g) It is therefore the intent ofthe general assembly to affirm and strengthen protections that guarantee equal access to examinations.
(h) In a recent District Court decision, Catherine Dunn V.
(h) In a recent District Court decisionCatherine Dunn V.
The decision to grant a preliminary injunction does not address section 24-34-806, which clearly states that failure to accommodate is a proper cause of action.
The decision to grant a preliminary injunction does not address section 24-34-806, which clearly states that failure to accommodate is a proper cause ofaction.
(2) The general assembly further finds and declares that it is the general assembly's intent that the National Board of Medical Examiners is a covered entity in this context, and that it is necessary to amend section 24-34-806 to align with 42 U.S.C.
(2) The general assembly further finds and declares that it is the general assembly's intent that the National Board ofMedical Examiners is a covered entity in·this context, and that it is necessary to amend section 24-34-806 to align with 42 U.S.C.
Testing accommodations for Coloradans with disabilities - right of action - legislative declaration - definitions.
Testing accommodations for Coloradans with disabilities - right ofaction - legislative declaration - definitions.
(c) "Testing entity" means a private entity of this state or a state or local governmental entity of this state that offers an exam related to licensing or certification for professional or trade purposes and has control overtestingaccommodationdecisions.
(c) "Testing entity" means a private enticy ofthis state m a state01 local govemmental entity of this state that off-ets an exam Ielated to licensing m certification fox prnfessional01 txade putposes and has contrnl vet testingaccommodationdecisions.
ANYPERSON ,BUSINESS ,ORSTATEOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY THAT OFFERS EXAMINATIONS OR COURSES RELATEDTOAPPLICATIONS ,LICENSING ,CERTIFICATION ,ORCREDENTIALING FORSECONDARYORPOSTSECONDARYEDUCATION ,ORFORPROFESSIONALOR TRADE PURPOSES .
ANY PERSON, BUSINESS, ORSTATEOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY THAT OFFERS EXAMINATIONS OR COURSES RELATEDTOAPPLICATIONS, LICENSING, CERTIFICATION, ORCREDENTIALING FORSECONDARYORPOSTSECONDARYEDUCATION,ORFORPROFESSIONALOR TRADE PURPOSES.
(3) (a) A testing entity mustOFFER EXAMINATIONS OR COURSES IN A PLACE AND MANNER ACCESSIBLE TO INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES OR MUST OFFER ALTERNATIVE ACCESSIBLE ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH INDIVIDUALSAND grantanindividual'srequestforatestingaccommodation on a licensing exam if the individual:
(3) (a) A testing entity must OFFER EXAMINATIONS OR COURSES IN A PLACE AND MANNER ACCESSIBLE TO INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES OR MUST OFFER ALTERNATIVE ACCESSIBLE ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH INDIVIDUALS AND grantan individual'srequestfor atestingaccommodation on a licensing exam ifthe individual:
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiod after final adjournment of the general assembly(August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment ofthe general assembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
except that, if a referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestate constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1417 approvedbythepeopleatthegeneralelectiontobeheldinNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuantto section 1(3) ofarticle V ofthe state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1417 approved bythepeople at the general electionto be held inNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date ofthe official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
____________________________ ____________________________ Julie McCluskie James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
J u l ~ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________ ____________________________ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE v ~ ~ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED °"'~ J ~ ~~ 4f,,'2.02JIo d12..~OpM (Dat and Time) DO PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1417
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1417
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  3. Signed by the President of the Senate

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments

  7. Senate Committee on Education Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole

  8. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Education

  9. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  10. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee

  11. House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  12. House Committee on Education Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

  13. Introduced In House - Assigned to Education

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 21 co-sponsors · 76 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (21)

Not signed on (76)

76 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 76 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

BILL

Passed 35 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 21000
Republican 9100
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 35100
% of votes cast 97%3%0%0%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Nay
Marc Catlin Republican Yea
Mark Baisley Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 6 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 3001
Republican 3000
Total 6001
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Not Voting
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
Rod Pelton Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 8000
Republican 4000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Garcia Sander — Yea
Eliza Hamrick Democrat Yea
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Yea
Katie Stewart Democrat Yea
Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat Yea
Matthew Martinez Democrat Yea
Meghan Lukens Democrat Yea
Tammy Story Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Anthony Hartsook Republican Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Yea
Dusty Johnson Republican Yea
Mary Bradfield Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1417 do?
Current law requires a testing entity to provide accommodations for an individual with a disability who is taking an exam for professional licensing. The current definition of 'testing entity' includes a private entity or a state or local governmental entity offering such an exam and having control over testing accommodation decisions.     The act changes the definition of 'testing entity' to include any person, business, or state or local government agency that offers an examination or course related to an application, license, certification, or credential for secondary or postsecondary education, professional, or trade purposes. The act further requires a testing entity to offer the exam or course in a place and manner that is accessible to an individual with a disability or offer an alternative accessible arrangement in order to accommodate an individual with a disability who has met the requirements to receive the accommodation.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors HB 1417?
HB 1417 is sponsored by J. Marchman, C. Kolker, C. Kipp, I. Jodeh, T. Exum, L. Daugherty, J. Coleman, D. Roberts, J. Rich, Jennifer Bacon (Democrat), Matt Soper (Republican), Andrew Boesenecker (Democrat), Monica Duran (Democrat), Meg Froelich (Democrat), Lori Goldstein (Democrat), Eliza Hamrick (Democrat), Jamie Jackson (Democrat), Sheila Lieder (Democrat), Kenny Nguyen (Democrat), Jacque Phillips (Democrat), Naquetta Ricks (Democrat), Manny Rutinel (Democrat), Katie Stewart (Democrat), Tammy Story (Democrat), and Karen McCormick (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1417?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 20, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 1417?
Track HB 1417 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1417

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1417

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →