Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 14 D · 5 R cosponsors

SB 37 — Modification of Bond Hearing Officer Process

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 26, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on April 02, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 25 sponsors

    4 primary, 21 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (14 D · 5 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

The act requires that the state court administrator create a process for evaluating bond hearing officers. An evaluation must include input from the district attorney and regional public defender and allow the opportunity for input from court staff and other interested parties within each judicial district in which a bond hearing officer presides.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

57 added · 85 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of SB 37 includes a new requirement that the State Court Administrator must create a process to evaluate bond hearing officers. These evaluations will involve feedback from attorneys, court staff, and other court users, ensuring a more comprehensive review of how these officers perform their duties. This change is important because it aims to improve the accountability and effectiveness of local judicial officers who set weekend bonds, ultimately leading to better judicial processes.

→
Previous
Latest
Second Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
NOTE:
26-0312.01 Veronica Parish x2606 SENATE BILL 26-037 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Rich and Roberts, Bridges, Bright, Catlin, Coleman, Cutter, Exum, Frizell, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Kirkmeyer, Lindstedt, Mullica, Snyder, Wallace, Weissman HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Soper and Espenoza, Bacon, Duran, Lieder, McCluskie d d e 2 E a 2 S U 7 U g 1 H d c e a R M Senate Committees House Committees 3 Judiciary Judiciary e n 2 A BILL FOR AN ACT E m 2 S n 6 C ONCERNING ALLOWING LOCAL ELECTED JUDICIAL OFFICERS TO SET O U h H i r WEEKEND BONDS .
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
a M R d Bill Summary 2 d (Note:
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does d 6 notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill e 0 E a , passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that T U 2 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available N g r S d a http://leg.colorado.gov.) e b R e F Undercurrentlaw,magistratesappointedasbondhearingofficers hold bond hearings in judicial districts on the weekend to ensure that citizens are able to be heard on bond within 48 hours of their arrest.
SENATE BILL 26-037 BYSENATOR(S)RichandRoberts,Bridges,Bright,Catlin,Cutter,Exum, Frizell, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Kirkmeyer, Lindstedt, Mullica, Snyder, Wallace, Weissman, Coleman;
The bond hearing officers set bonds, and staff help with the bond process.
also REPRESENTATIVE(S) Soper and Espenoza, Bacon, Duran, Lieder, McCluskie.
i 6 a 2 The bill allows available local elected judges to preside over e 2 T d 5 A 2 y E d a Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
CONCERNING ALLOWING LOCAL ELECTED JUDICIAL OFFICERS TO SET WEEKEND BONDS .
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
S d r Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.e e Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
m F A weekend bond hearings while utilizing the weekend bond court staff.
State court administrator - duties - report - definitions - repeal.
Statecourtadministrator-duties-report-definitions - repeal.
(18) (a) THE STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR SHALL DEVELOP A PROCESSFOREVALUATINGBONDHEARINGOFFICERSAPPOINTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 16-4-116.
(18) (a) T HE STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR SHALL DEVELOP A PROCESS FOR EVALUATING BOND HEARINGOFFICERSAPPOINTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-4-116.
HE ANNUAL EVALUATIONS MUST INCLUDE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR INPUT FROM ATTORNEYS ,COURT STAFF, AND OTHER INTERESTED COURT USERS .
THE ANNUAL EVALUATIONS MUST INCLUDE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR INPUT FROM ATTORNEYS , COURT STAFF , AND OTHER INTERESTED COURT USERS .
(b) IN EACH ANNUAL EVALUATION ,INPUT MUST BE GIVEN BY:
________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
(I) T HE ELECTED DISTRICT ATTORNEY , OR THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY 'SDESIGNEE,FOREACHJUDICIALDISTRICT INWHICHTHE BOND HEARING OFFICER PRESIDED DURING THE EVALUATION PERIOD;AND (II) TEREGIONALPUBLICDEFENDER ,ORTHEPUBLICDEFENDER 'S DESIGNEE ,FOR EACH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN WHICH THE BOND HEARING OFFICER PRESIDED DURING THE EVALUATION PERIOD.
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
(c) T HE EVALUATION PROCESS MUST ENSURE THAT INPUT IS SOLICITED FROM EACH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN WHICH A WEEKEND BOND HEARINGOFFICERPRESIDES ,RECOGNIZINGTHAT PRACTICES ,RESOURCES , ANDCONDITIONSMAYVARYSIGNIFICANTLYACROSSJUDICIALDISTRICTS .
(b) IN EACH ANNUAL EVALUATION ,INPUT MUST BE GIVEN BY :
(I) THEELECTEDDISTRICTATTORNEY ORTHEDISTRICTATTORNEY S DESIGNEE , FOR EACH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN WHICH THE BOND HEARING OFFICER PRESIDED DURING THE EVALUATION PERIOD ;AND (II) THE REGIONAL PUBLIC DEFENDER ,OR THE PUBLIC DEFENDER S DESIGNEE ,FOR EACH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN WHICH THE BOND HEARING OFFICER PRESIDED DURING THE EVALUATION PERIOD .
(c) THE EVALUATION PROCESS MUST ENSURE THAT INPUT IS SOLICITED FROM EACH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN WHICH A WEEKEND BOND HEARING OFFICER PRESIDES ,RECOGNIZING THAT PRACTICES ,RESOURCES , AND CONDITIONS MAY VARY SIGNIFICANTLY ACROSS JUDICIAL DISTRICTS .
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservationofthepublicpeace,health,orsafetyorforappropriationsfor -2- 037 the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-037 the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
-3- 037
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-037
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Sent to the Governor

  3. Signed by the President of the Senate

  4. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  5. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments

  7. House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

  8. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  9. Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

  10. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  11. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 02/25/2026 - No Amendments

  12. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 02/23/2026 - No Amendments

  13. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 02/18/2026 - No Amendments

  14. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  15. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 21 co-sponsors · 76 not signed on

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (21)

Not signed on (76)

76 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 76 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

BILL

Passed 59 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 39002
Republican 16003
Unaffiliated 4001
Total 59006
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (65)
Member Party Vote
Gonzalez R. — Not Voting
Stewart K. — Yea
Stewart R. — Yea
Winter T. — Yea
Garcia Sander — Yea
Alex Valdez Democrat Yea
Amy Paschal Democrat Yea
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Bob Marshall Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Yea
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Eliza Hamrick Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Emily Sirota Democrat Yea
Gretchen Rydin Democrat Yea
Jacque Phillips Democrat Yea
Jamie Jackson Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Yea
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Yea
Jenny Willford Democrat Not Voting
Julie McCluskie Democrat Yea
Junie Joseph Democrat Yea
Karen McCormick Democrat Yea
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Yea
Kyle Brown Democrat Yea
Lesley Smith Democrat Yea
Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat Yea
Lisa Feret Democrat Yea
Lorena Garcia Democrat Yea
Lori Goldstein Democrat Yea
Mandy Lindsay Democrat Yea
Manny Rutinel Democrat Yea
Matthew Martinez Democrat Yea
Meg Froelich Democrat Yea
Meghan Lukens Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Monica Duran Democrat Yea
Naquetta Ricks Democrat Not Voting
Regina English Democrat Yea
Sean Camacho Democrat Yea
Sheila Lieder Democrat Yea
Steven Woodrow Democrat Yea
Tammy Story Democrat Yea
Tisha Mauro Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Anthony Hartsook Republican Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Yea
Brandi Bradley Republican Not Voting
Carlos Barron Republican Yea
Chris Richardson Republican Yea
Dan Woog Republican Yea
Dusty Johnson Republican Yea
Jarvis Caldwell Republican Yea
Ken DeGraaf Republican Not Voting
Larry Don Suckla Republican Yea
Mary Bradfield Republican Yea
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Max Brooks Republican Yea
Rebecca Keltie Republican Yea
Rick Taggart Republican Not Voting
Ron Weinberg Republican Yea
Scott Bottoms Republican Yea
Scott Slaugh Republican Yea
Stephanie Luck Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 6001
Republican 4000
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Not Voting
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Yea
Lorena Garcia Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Yea
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Rebecca Keltie Republican Yea
Scott Slaugh Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 37 do?
The act requires that the state court administrator create a process for evaluating bond hearing officers. An evaluation must include input from the district attorney and regional public defender and allow the opportunity for input from court staff and other interested parties within each judicial district in which a bond hearing officer presides.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors SB 37?
SB 37 is sponsored by J. McCluskie, S. Lieder, M. Duran, J. Bacon, M. Soper, C. Espenoza, Janice Rich (Republican), Jeff Bridges (Democrat), Scott Bright (Republican), Marc Catlin (Republican), James Coleman (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), Tony Exum (Democrat), Lisa Frizell (Republican), Julie Gonzales (Democrat), Iman Jodeh (Democrat), Cathy Kipp (Democrat), Barbara Kirkmeyer (Republican), Kyle Mullica (Democrat), Katie Wallace (Democrat), Mike Weissman (Democrat), Dylan Roberts (Democrat), Nick Hinrichsen (Democrat), William Lindstedt (Democrat), and Marc Snyder (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 37?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 26, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 37?
Track SB 37 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 37

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 37

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →