Family Stability & Kinship Care
Families may find it easier to keep children connected to their relatives during challenging times.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1314 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1314.
You're tracking HB 1314
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1314 — Family Stability & Kinship Care
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 02, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on June 01, 2026.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
18 sponsors
2 primary, 16 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill updates definitions and prioritizes kinship placements in child welfare cases.
This bill expands the definitions of 'grandparent' and 'great-grandparent' for court purposes and emphasizes placing children with relatives or kin when they are removed from their homes. It also repeals outdated provisions regarding grandparent placements.
What this means for you
- Families: Families may find it easier to keep children connected to their relatives during challenging times.
Summary
The act expands the definitions of 'grandparent' and 'great-grandparent' in the context of court-ordered family time to account for situations in which the child's father or mother is deceased. To align with changes enacted in 2023 that address kinship and relative placements more broadly, the act repeals language specific to grandparent placements in child welfare cases and the types of evidence a court considers in connection with a grandparent's past abusive or neglectful conduct. When a child or youth is removed from the home, the act requires the court to prioritize the child's or youth's temporary placement with a relative or kin, unless the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that temporary placement with the relative or kin is not in the best interests of the child.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
48 added · 55 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill HB 1314 emphasizes the importance of placing children in kinship care arrangements, such as with grandparents or other relatives, when they are removed from their homes. This change aims to strengthen family connections, thereby promoting stability and well-being for children. The addition also requires social services to diligently reach out to all relatives within 30 days of a child's removal, ensuring that family ties are prioritized early in the process. This matters because fostering these connections can lead to quicker reunification and better outcomes for children and families.
NOTE:
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
CCONCERNING ONCERNING INCREASING FAMILY STABILITYSTABILITY, ,AND, AND , IN CONNECTION THEREWITHTHEREWITH, , PRIORITIZING KINSHIP PLACEMENTS IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES AND FACILITATING GRANDPARENT CONTACTCONTACT. .
Be it enacted by the GeneralGeneralAssembly Assemblyofthe of the State ofofColorado: Colorado:
(1)( 1) The general assembly finds and declares that:
(a) PlacingachildorPlacing youtha child oryouth who has been removed fromtheirfrom their home in safe kinship care settings promotes familystability,family stability, speeds permanency, and yields better long-term outcomes, which may include safe and timely reunification ofofa a child or youth with their parent;
Similarly, post-adoption contact between a child and a grandparent can be ________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsdeletionsfrom from existing law andandsuch such material is notnotpart part of the act.
an ongoing source ofofsupport, support, stability, and affection.
(2) The general assembly finds, therefore, that targeted legislative reforms to prioritize kinship placements and preserve grandparent-grandchildrelationshipswillpromotethestability,safety,andgrandparent-grandchild well-beingrelationships ofwill children,promote the stability, safety, and well-being ofchildren, youth, and families throughout the state.
(a) "Grandparent"meansapersonwhois"Grandparent" ORmeans ,IFTHECHILDapersonwho SFATHERis OR, IFTHECHILD'S FATHER OR MOTHER IS DECEASEDDECEASED, ,WASWAS the parent ofofa a child's father or mother, who is related to the child by blood, in whole or by half, adoption, or marriage;
except that "grandparent" does not include the parent of a child's legal father or mother whose parental rights have been terminated in accordance with sections 19-5-101 and 19-1-104 (1)(d).(l)(d).
(b) "Great-grandparent" means a person who is OR,IFOR, IF THE CHILDCHILD'S S FATHER OR MOTHER OR GRANDPARENT IS DECEASEDDECEASED, ,WASw AS the grandparent ofofa a child's father or mother, who is related to the child by blood, in whole or by half, adoption, or marriage;
except that "great-grandparent" does not include the grandparent ofofa a child's legal father or mother whose parental rights have been terminated in accordance with sections 19-5-101 and 19-1-104 (1)(d).(l)(d).
Temporarycustody-hearing-timelimits-restrictionTemporarycustody-hearing- time limits -restriction - rules.
(3.6) (a) (IV) The court shall order a county department of human or social services to exercise due diligenceNDdiligencAND DOCUMENT ITS DILIGENT PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 26-1314 EFFORTSEFFORTSto to contact all grandparents and other adult relatives and identified kin within thirty days after the removal ofofthe the child or youth and to inform them about placement possibilities for the child or youth, unless the court determines there is good cause not to contact or good cause to delay contactingthechild'soryouth'srelativesandkin,including,butnotlimitedcontactingthe child's oryouth's relatives and kin, including, but not limited to, family or domestic violence.
(V) (A) The court shall give preference to giving temporary placementtoachild'splacementto a child's or youth's relative or kinwhoiscapable,willing,andkin who is capable, willing, and available for care.
giving primarypdmary considerationconsideiation to the child's or01 youth's mental, physical, and emotional needs, including the child's or youth's preferenceregardingplacement.Pptefetence LACEMENTOFTHECHILDORYOUTHWITHIegatding THEplacement. RELATIVE OR KIN IS PRESUMED TO BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD OR YOUTH .
TPLACEMENTOFTHECHILDORYOUTHWITH HE PRESUMPTION MAY BE REBUTTED BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCERELATIVE ,GIVINGORKIN PRIMARYIS CONSIDERATIONPRESUMED TO THEBE CHILDINTHE SBEST ORINTERESTS YOUTHOFTHE S MENTAL ,PHYSICAL ,AND EMOTIONAL NEEDS , INCLUDING THE CHILD 'S OR YOUTHYOUTH. 'S PREFERENCE REGARDING PLACEMENT .
THE PRESUMPTION MAY BE REBUTTED BY A PREPONDERANCE OFTHE EVIDENCE, GIVING PRIMARY CONSIDERATION TO THE CHILD'S OR YOUTH'S MENTAL, PHYSICAL, AND EMOTIONAL NEEDS, INCLUDINGTHECHILD'SORYOUTH'SPREFERENCEREGARDINGPLACEMENT.
The court may place or continue custodywiththecountydepartmentofcustody humanorsocialwith the county department ofhuman or social services if thecourtissatisfiedfromtheinformationpresentedatthehearingthatsuchthe THEcourt custodyisis satisfied from the informationpresented at the hearingthatsuch THEcustody is appropriate and in the child's or youth's best interests, or the court may enter such other orders as are appropriate.
(B) The court may authorize the county department of human or social services with custody of a child or youth to place the child or youth with a relative or kin without the necessity for a hearing if a county department of human or social services locates a capable and willing relative or kin who is available to care for the child or youth and the guardian ad litem!item ofofthe the child or youth concurs that the placement is in the best interests of the child or youth.
If the county department of human or social services places a child or youth with a relative or kin without a hearingpursuanttothissubsection(3.6)(a)(V)hearingpursuantto SUBSECTIONthis (3.6)(a)(V)(B),subsection (3.6)(a)(V) SUBSECTION(3.6)(a)(V)(B), the county department of human or social services shall fully inform the courtofthedetailsconcerningthechild'soryouth'splacementontherecordcourt ofthe details concerningthe child's oryouth'splacementonthe record at the next hearing.
If the court enters an order removing a child or youth from the home or continuing a child or youth in a placement out of the PAGE 3-HOUSE3-HOUSEBILL BILL 26-1314 home, the court shall make the findings required pursuant to section 19-1-115 (6) ififsTHE such findings are warranted by the evidence.
Safety clause.clauseThe general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation ofthe public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
TheJ general~ assembly-\::: finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
____________________________ ____________________________ Julie McCluskie James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________v ____________________________~ ~ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________APPROVED (DateoV''(Y\o~o(li1J\Ml andIt+ Time)2 _________________________________________0 Jared2 S.0M /I:
PolisoOlil~ GOVERNOR(Date OFand THETime) STATE) TATE OF COLORADO PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1314
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Health & Human Services
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
House Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
House Committee on Health & Human Services Witness Testimony and/or Committee Discussion Only
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Health & Human Services
Sponsors
- Adrienne Benavidez · Cosponsor
- K. Wallace · Cosponsor
- M. Snyder · Cosponsor
- D. Roberts · Cosponsor
- K. Mullica · Cosponsor
- J. Marchman · Cosponsor
- C. Kolker · Cosponsor
- N. Hinrichsen · Cosponsor
- J. Gonzales · Cosponsor
- L. Daugherty · Cosponsor
- L. Cutter · Cosponsor
- J. Coleman · Cosponsor
- T. Exum · Primary
- Monica Duran · Cosponsor
- Sheila Lieder · Cosponsor
- Jennifer Bacon · Cosponsor
- Regina English · Primary
- Junie Joseph · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 16 co-sponsors · 84 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- T. Exum
- Regina English Democrat
Co-sponsors (16)
- Adrienne Benavidez
- K. Wallace
- M. Snyder
- D. Roberts
- K. Mullica
- J. Marchman
- C. Kolker
- N. Hinrichsen
- J. Gonzales
- L. Daugherty
- L. Cutter
- J. Coleman
- Monica Duran Democrat
- Sheila Lieder Democrat
- Jennifer Bacon Democrat
- Junie Joseph Democrat
Not signed on (84)
84 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 84 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 17% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Yea |
| Gretchen Rydin | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsay Gilchrist | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Feret | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Yea |
| Carlos Barron | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1314 do?
- The act expands the definitions of 'grandparent' and 'great-grandparent' in the context of court-ordered family time to account for situations in which the child's father or mother is deceased. To align with changes enacted in 2023 that address kinship and relative placements more broadly, the act repeals language specific to grandparent placements in child welfare cases and the types of evidence a court considers in connection with a grandparent's past abusive or neglectful conduct. When a child or youth is removed from the home, the act requires the court to prioritize the child's or youth's temporary placement with a relative or kin, unless the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that temporary placement with the relative or kin is not in the best interests of the child.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors HB 1314?
- HB 1314 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, K. Wallace, M. Snyder, D. Roberts, K. Mullica, J. Marchman, C. Kolker, N. Hinrichsen, J. Gonzales, L. Daugherty, L. Cutter, J. Coleman, T. Exum, Monica Duran (Democrat), Sheila Lieder (Democrat), Jennifer Bacon (Democrat), Regina English (Democrat), and Junie Joseph (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1314?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 02, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1314?
- Track HB 1314 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1314
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1314
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →