Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 21 D · 12 R cosponsors

SB 132 — Voluntary Alcohol Breath Test

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on June 04, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 59 sponsors

    4 primary, 55 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (21 D · 12 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill allows voluntary alcohol breath tests for drivers involved in serious collisions.

Law enforcement must offer drivers a chance to take a breath alcohol test after a serious collision. If the test can't be given due to device issues, this must be documented.

Summary

If a driver is involved in a collision resulting in death or suspected serious bodily injury, the act requires, with certain exceptions, a law enforcement officer (officer) to offer the driver the opportunity to voluntarily submit to a preliminary alcohol screening test (test) of the driver's breath after the officer advises the driver that they may refuse or agree to provide a sample for the test.     If an officer is unable to administer a test because the testing device malfunctions or is unable to produce a valid result, or because the testing device is unavailable due to extenuating circumstances or circumstances beyond the officer's control, the officer is required to document on a required incident report concerning the collision that the test could not be administered and the reason why it could not be administered.     The act appropriates $90,000 from the parks and outdoor recreation cash fund and $30,000 from the wildlife cash fund to the department of natural resources for use by the division of Colorado parks and wildlife to implement the act.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

78 added · 88 removed

Plain-language change summary

This amendment to SB 132 adds new details regarding its sponsorship, including a significant mention of a tragic incident involving a young cyclist, Magnus White, who was killed by a vehicle. The inclusion of his story serves to highlight the serious consequences of impaired driving and emphasizes the importance of implementing voluntary alcohol screening for drivers. By adding this context, the bill strengthens its case for more proactive measures in preventing similar incidents on the road.

→
Previous
Latest
NOTE:
SENATE BILL 26-132 BY SENATOR(S)Roberts and Carson,Amabile, Baisley, Ball,Benavidez, Bridges, Bright, Catlin, Cutter, Daugherty, Exum, Frizell, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kipp, Kirkmeyer, Kolker, Lindstedt,Liston,Marchman, Mullica, PeltonB., PeltonR., Rich, Rodriguez, Simpson, Snyder, Sullivan, Wallace, Weissman, Zamora Wilson, Coleman;
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
also REPRESENTATIVE(S) Joseph and Soper, Barron, Boesenecker, Bradley, Brown, Caldwell, Camacho, Clifford, Duran, Froelich, Goldstein, Gonzalez R., Hamrick, Jackson, Keltie, Lieder, Nguyen, Paschal, Phillips, Ricks, Rutinel, Smith, Taggart, McCluskie.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
CONCERNING A REQUIREMENT THAT A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OFFER A VOLUNTARY PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST FOR ALCOHOL TO A DRIVER, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, MAKING AN APPROPRIATION.
SENATE BILL 26-132 BYSENATOR(S)RobertsandCarson,Amabile,Baisley,Ball,Benavidez, Bridges, Bright, Catlin, Cutter, Daugherty, Exum, Frizell, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen,Jodeh,Kipp,Kirkmeyer,Kolker,Lindstedt,Liston,Marchman, Mullica,PeltonB.,PeltonR.,Rich,Rodriguez,Simpson,Snyder,Sullivan, Wallace, Weissman, Zamora Wilson, Coleman;
Be it enacted by the GeneralAssembly ofthe State ofColorado:
also REPRESENTATIVE(S) Joseph and Soper, Barron, Boesenecker, Bradley,Brown,Caldwell,Camacho,Clifford,Duran,Froelich,Goldstein, Gonzalez R., Hamrick, Jackson, Keltie, Lieder, Nguyen, Paschal, Phillips, Ricks, Rutinel, Smith, Taggart, McCluskie.
CONCERNING A REQUIREMENT THAT A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OFFER A VOLUNTARY PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST FOR ALCOHOL TO A DRIVER , AND , IN CONNECTION THEREWITH , MAKING AN APPROPRIATION .
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
(1) The general assembly finds and declares that:
( 1) The general assembly finds and declares that:
________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
Capital letters o& italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsfrom existing law andsuch material is not part of the act.
(a) On July 29, 2023, at 12:28 p.m., Magnus White, a 17-year-old member of the USA Cycling National Team, was struck bya car and killed whiletrainingonaBoulderroadway.Theinvestigationuncoveredevidence that the car's driver consumed alcohol and drugs prior to the crash.
(a) On July 29, 2023, at 12:28 p.m., Magnus White, a 17-year-old member ofthe USA CyclingNational Team, was struck by a car and killed whiletrainingonaBoulderroadway.
Theinvestigationuncoveredevidence that the car's driver consumed alcohol and drugs prior to the crash.
(b) Allowingalawenforcementofficerdiscretiontodecidewhether to offer a voluntary preliminary screening test can result in inconsistent investigationpractices,particularlyatscenesofseriouscollisionsinvolving multiplerespondingagencieswhereresponsibilityforspecificinvestigative steps may be unclear;
(b) Allowingalawenforcementofficerdiscretionto decidewhether to offer a voluntary preliminary screening test can result in inconsistent investigationpractices,particularlyatscenes ofserious collisions involving multiplerespondingagencieswhereresponsibility forspecific investigative steps may be unclear;
Without it, evidence suggesting a driver's sobriety or impairment may be permanently lost and the state must investigate a driver's sobriety or impairment through other means, at significant cost and with prolonged proceedings.Asaresult,thecausesofsomecollisionsmayneverbeknown.
Without it, evidence suggesting a driver's sobriety or impairment may be permanently lost and the state must investigate a driver's sobriety or impairment through other means, at significant cost and with prolonged proceedings.
As aresult, the causes ofsome collisionsmayneverbeknown.
and (f) The purpose of "Magnus' Law" is to honor the memory of Magnus White by ensuring that a law enforcement officer always offers a voluntary preliminary screening test to a driver involved in a collision involving a serious injuryor fatalityand that the opportunityto investigate is never lost at the scene of the most serious collisions on Colorado's roadways.
and (f) The purpose of "Magnus' Law" is to honor the memory of Magnus White by ensuring that a law enforcement officer always offers a voluntary preliminary screening test to a driver involved in a collision involving a serious injury or fatality and that the opportunity to investigate is never lost at the scene of the most serious collisions on Colorado's roadways.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 42-4-1301, add (6)(i)(I.3), (6)(i)(I.4), (6)(i)(I.5), (6)(i)(I.6), and (9) as follows:
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 42-4-1301, add (6)(i)(I.3), (6)(i)(l.4), (6)(i)(l.5), (6)(i)(l.6), and (9) as follows:
Drivingundertheinfluence-drivingwhileimpaired - driving with excessive alcoholic content - penalties - definitions.
Driving underthe influence -drivingwhile impaired - driving with excessive alcoholic content - penalties - definitions.
(6)(i)(I.3)OLLOWINGLAWFULCONTACTWITHANINDIVIDUALWHO HASBEENDRIVINGAMOTORVEHICLEORVEHICLEINVOLVEDINACOLLISION RESULTING IN DEATH OR SUSPECTED SERIOUS BODILY INJURY , A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SHALL OFFER THE DRIVER THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOLUNTARILY SUBMIT A SAMPLE OF THE DRIVER 'S BREATH FOR A PRELIMINARYSCREENINGTESTFORALCOHOLUSINGADEVICEAPPROVEDBY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT ,AFTER FIRST ADVISING THE DRIVER THAT THE DRIVER MAY REFUSE OR AGREE TO THE PRELIMINARY TESTWHEN :
(6) (i) (1.3) FOLLOWINGLAWFULCONTACTWITHAN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS BEEN DRIVINGA MOTOR VEHICLEOR VEHICLE INVOLVED IN ACOLLISION RESULTING IN DEATH OR SUSPECTED SERIOUS BODILY INJURY, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SHALL OFFER THE DRIVER THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOLUNTARILY SUBMIT A SAMPLE OF THE DRIVER'S BREATH FOR A PRELIMINARY SCREENINGTEST FORALCOHOL USINGA DEVICEAPPROVED BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, AFTER FIRST ADVISING THE DRIVER THAT THE DRIVER MAY REFUSE OR AGREE TO THE PRELIMINARY TEST, WHEN:
(A) THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER HAS REASONABLE SUSPICION THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE DRIVER AND IS AT FAULT IN THE COLLISION (B) T HE INDIVIDUAL WHO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER REASONABLY SUSPECTS TO BE THE DRIVER AT FAULT IN THE COLLISION IS NOT SIGNIFICANTLY INJURED OR IN NEED OF IMMEDIATE MEDICAL ATTENTION ;AND (C) T HE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE PROBABLE CAUSENECESSARYFORTHEEXPRESSEDCONSENTREQUIREMENTSDESCRIBED PURSUANT TO SECTION 42-4-1301.1.
(A) THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER HAS REASONABLE SUSPICION THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE DRIVER AND IS AT FAULT IN THE COLLISION;
(I.4) NTWITHSTANDINGSUBSECTION (6)(i)(IOFTHISSECTION ,A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IS NOT REQUIRED TO OFFER THE DRIVER THE OPPORTUNITYTOVOLUNTARILYSUBMITASAMPLEOFTHEDRIVER SBREATH FOR A PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST FOR ALCOHOL PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (6)(i)(I.OF THIS SECTION IF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS INITIAL CONTACT WITH THE DRIVE:
(8) THE INDIVIDUAL WHO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER REASONABLY SUSPECTS TO BE THE DRIVER AT FAULT IN THE COLLISION IS NOT SIGNIFICANTLY INJURED OR IN NEED OF IMMEDIATE MEDICAL ATTENTION;
(A) OCCURSMORETHANTWOHOURSFOLLOWINGTHECOLLISION ;OR (B) ENDED ANDTHEDRIVERHASLEFTTHESCENEOFTHECOLLISION ORTHEAREAWHERELAWENFORCEMENTMADE INITIALCONTACT WITHTHE DRIVERANDTHEDRIVERISNOTINLAWENFORCEMENT SPRESENCEBUTLAW ENFORCEMENT SUBSEQUENTLY LEARNS THAT THE COLLISION INVOLVED DEATH OR SERIOUS BODILY INJURY WHEN THAT WAS NOT INITIALLY SUSPECTED OR KNOWN .
AND (C) THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE PROBABLE CAUSENECESSARY FORTHE EXPRESSEDCONSENTREQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED PURSUANT TO SECTION 42-4-1301.1.
PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-132 (I.5) WHEN ,PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (6)(i)(I.OFTHIS SECTION , A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ADVISES A DRIVER THAT THE DRIVER MAY EITHER REFUSE OR AGREE TO VOLUNTARILY PROVIDE A SAMPLE OF THE DRIVER S BREATH FOR A PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST , THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SHALL ADVISE THE DRIVER IN PLAIN LANGUAGE THAT :
(1.4)NOTWITHSTANDING SUBSECTION (6)(i)(l.3) OFTHIS SECTION, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IS NOT REQUIRED TO OFFER THE DRIVER THE OPPORTUNITYTO VOLUNTARILY SUBMITASAMPLEOFTHE DRIVER'S BREATH FOR A PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST FOR ALCOHOL PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (6)(i)(l.3) OF THIS SECTION IF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER'S INITIAL CONTACT WITH THE DRIVER:
(A) T HEINDIVIDUALISBEINGASKEDTOPROVIDEASAMPLEOFTHEIR BREATH FOR A PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST REGARDING WHETHER THEY ARE INTOXICATED BECAUSE THEY WERE DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE OR VEHICLE INVOLVED IN A SERIOUS COLLISION;
(A) OCCURS MORETHANTWO HOURS FOLLOWINGTHECOLLISION;
(B) IF THE INDIVIDUAL TAKES THE PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST , THE RESULTS OR THE INDIVIDUAL 'S REFUSAL TO TAKE THE TEST ARE NOT ADMISSIBLE IN COURT;
OR (8) ENDED,ANDTHEDRIVERHASLEFTTHESCENEOFTHECOLLISION ORTHE AREA WHERE LAW ENFORCEMENT MADE INITIAL CONTACT WITH THE DRIVERAND THE DRIVER ISNOT IN LAW ENFORCEMENT'S PRESENCEBUTLAW ENFORCEMENT SUBSEQUENTLY LEARNS THAT THE COLLISION INVOLVED DEATH OR SERIOUS BODILY INJURY WHEN THAT WAS NOT INITIALLY SUSPECTED OR KNOWN.
(C) IF THE INDIVIDUAL TAKES THE PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST , EVIDENCE OF INTOXICATION MAY BE USED AS EVIDENCE TO REQUEST FURTHER TESTING THAT IS ADMISSIBLE IN COURT OR TO MAKE AN ARREST ;
PA G E 3-SEN A TEBILL 26-132 (I.5)WHEN, PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (6)(i)(I.OF THIS SECTION, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ADVISES A DRIVER THAT THE DRIVER MAY EITHER REFUSE OR AGREE TO VOLUNTARILY PROVIDE A SAMPLE OF THE DRIVER'S BREATH FOR A PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST, THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SHALL ADVISE THE DRIVER IN PLAIN LANGUAGE THAT:
(D) T HE PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST IS VOLUNTARY ;AND (E) F THE INDIVIDUAL REFUSES TO TAKE THE PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST ,THE REFUSAL DOES NOT AFFECT THE STATUS OF THEIR DRIVER S LICENSE.
(A) THE INDIVIDUAL IS BEINGASKEDTO PROVIDE ASAMPLEOFTHEIR BREATH FOR A PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST REGARDING WHETHER THEY ARE INTOXICATED BECAUSE THEY WERE DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE OR VEHICLE INVOLVED IN A SERIOUS COLLISION;
(I.6) I A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IS UNABLE TO ADMINISTER A PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST FOR ALCOHOL BECAUSE THE DEVICE MALFUNCTIONS OR IS UNABLE TO PRODUCE A VALID RESULT ,OR IFTHE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IS UNABLE TO OFFER A PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST FOR ALCOHOL BECAUSE A DEVICE IS UNAVAILABLE DUE TO EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES OR CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER S REASONABLE CONTROL ,THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERSHALLDOCUMENTONANYREQUIREDINCIDENTREPORTRELATEDTO THE COLLISION THAT THE PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST COULD NOT BE ADMINISTERED AND THE REASON WHY IT COULD NOT BE ADMINISTERED .
(8) IF THE INDIVIDUAL TAKES THE PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST, THE RESULTS OR THE INDIVIDUAL'S REFUSAL TO TAKE THE TEST ARE NOT ADMISSIBLE IN COURT;
(9) A S USED IN THIS SECTION,UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES , SERIOUS BODILY INJURY " HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 18-1-901.
(C) IF THE INDIVIDUAL TAKES THE PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST, EVIDENCE OF INTOXICATION MAY BE USED AS EVIDENCE TO REQUEST FURTHER TESTING THAT IS ADMISSIBLE IN COURT OR TO MAKE AN ARREST;
PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-132 SECTION4.
(D) THE PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST IS VOLUNTARY;
Appropriation.(1) Forthe2026-27statefiscalyear, $120,000 is appropriated to the department of natural resources for use by the division of Colorado parks and wildlife.
AND (E) IF THE INDIVIDUAL REFUSES TO TAKE THE PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST, THE REFUSAL DOES NOT AFFECT THE STATUS OF THEIR DRIVER'S LICENSE.
This appropriation consists of $90,000 fromtheparksandoutdoorrecreationcashfund created in section 33-10-111 (1), C.R.S., and $30,000 from the wildlife cash fund created in section33-1-112(1)(a),C.R.S.Toimplementthisact,thedivisionmayuse this appropriation as follows:
(l.6)IF A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IS UNABLE TO ADMINISTER A PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST FOR ALCOHOL BECAUSE THE DEVICE MALFUNCTIONS OR IS UNABLE TO PRODUCE AVALID RESULT, OR IF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IS UNABLE TO OFFER A PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST FOR ALCOHOL BECAUSE A DEVICE IS UNAVAILABLE DUE TO EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES OR CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER'S REASONABLE CONTROL, THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERSHALLDOCUMENTON ANY REQUIRED INCIDENTREPORTRELATEDTO THE COLLISION THAT THE PRELIMINARY SCREENING TEST COULD NOT BE ADMINISTERED AND THE REASON WHY IT COULD NOT BE ADMINISTERED.
(9) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES, "SERIOUS BODILY INJURY" HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 18-1-901.
PA G E 4-SEN A TE B IL 26-132 SECTION 4.
Appropriation.
(I) Forthe2026-27 state fiscal year, $120,000 is appropriated to the department ofnatural resources for use by the division ofColorado parks and wildlife.
This appropriation consists of $90,000 from the parks and outdoorrecreation cash fund created in section 33-10-111 (1), C.R.S., and $30,000 from the wildlife cash fund created in section 33-1-112 (l)(a), C.R.S.
To implementthis act, the division may use this appropriation as follows:
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);exceptthat,if areferendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2026 and, in suchcase,willtakeeffectonthedateof the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 12, 2026, ifadjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 26-132 (2) This act applies to incidents occurring on or after the applicable effective date of this act.
exceptthat, ifa referendum petition is filed pursuantto section I (3) of article V ofthe state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part ofthis act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date ofthe official declaration ofthe vote thereon by the governor.
Show all 45 changed rows (5 more)
Previous
Latest
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 26-132 (2) This act applies to incidents occurring on or after the applicable effective date ofthis act.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
PRESIDENT OF Coleman, Sr.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 26-132
~SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE.
THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES Esther van Mourik VaessaReilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED enT u t and Time)v\ ..-7J2et\,+0:3d11M Jared S.
GOVE PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 26-132
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the President of the Senate

  3. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass

  6. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  7. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  8. House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

  9. House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Appropriations

  10. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  11. Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

  12. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee

  13. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  14. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 55 co-sponsors · 42 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (55)

Not signed on (42)

42 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 42 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

REPASS

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 21000
Republican 8002
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 34002
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Not Voting
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea
Marc Catlin Republican Not Voting
Mark Baisley Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

CONCUR

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 21000
Republican 8002
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 34002
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Not Voting
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea
Marc Catlin Republican Not Voting
Mark Baisley Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 8000
Republican 0300
Total 8300
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Emily Sirota Democrat Yea
Junie Joseph Democrat Yea
Karen McCormick Democrat Yea
Kyle Brown Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Chris Richardson Republican Nay
Rick Taggart Republican Nay
Scott Bottoms Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Adopt amendment J.001

Passed 8 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 8000
Republican 0300
Total 8300
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Emily Sirota Democrat Yea
Junie Joseph Democrat Yea
Karen McCormick Democrat Yea
Kyle Brown Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Chris Richardson Republican Nay
Rick Taggart Republican Nay
Scott Bottoms Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 7000
Republican 4000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Yea
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Yea
Lorena Garcia Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Yea
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Rebecca Keltie Republican Yea
Scott Slaugh Republican Yea

Official roll call →

BILL

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 20001
Republican 10000
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 35001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Not Voting
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea
Marc Catlin Republican Yea
Mark Baisley Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 132 do?
If a driver is involved in a collision resulting in death or suspected serious bodily injury, the act requires, with certain exceptions, a law enforcement officer (officer) to offer the driver the opportunity to voluntarily submit to a preliminary alcohol screening test (test) of the driver's breath after the officer advises the driver that they may refuse or agree to provide a sample for the test.     If an officer is unable to administer a test because the testing device malfunctions or is unable to produce a valid result, or because the testing device is unavailable due to extenuating circumstances or circumstances beyond the officer's control, the officer is required to document on a required incident report concerning the collision that the test could not be administered and the reason why it could not be administered.     The act appropriates $90,000 from the parks and outdoor recreation cash fund and $30,000 from the wildlife cash fund to the department of natural resources for use by the division of Colorado parks and wildlife to implement the act.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors SB 132?
SB 132 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, R. Taggart, L. Smith, M. Rutinel, N. Ricks, J. Phillips, A. Paschal, K. Nguyen, J. McCluskie, S. Lieder, R. Keltie, J. Jackson, E. Hamrick, R. Gonzalez, L. Goldstein, M. Froelich, M. Duran, C. Clifford, S. Camacho, J. Caldwell, K. Brown, B. Bradley, A. Boesenecker, C. Barron, Cathy Kipp (Democrat), Barbara Kirkmeyer (Republican), Chris Kolker (Democrat), Larry Liston (Republican), Janice Marchman (Democrat), Byron Pelton (Republican), Rod Pelton (Republican), Janice Rich (Republican), Robert Rodriguez (Democrat), Marc Snyder (Democrat), Tom Sullivan (Democrat), Katie Wallace (Democrat), Mike Weissman (Democrat), Lynda Zamora Wilson (Republican), M. Soper, J. Joseph, John Carson (Republican), Dylan Roberts (Democrat), Judy Amabile (Democrat), Mark Baisley (Republican), Matt Ball (Democrat), Jeff Bridges (Democrat), Scott Bright (Republican), Marc Catlin (Republican), James Coleman (Democrat), Lindsey Daugherty (Democrat), Tony Exum (Democrat), Lisa Frizell (Republican), Julie Gonzales (Democrat), Nick Hinrichsen (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), Iman Jodeh (Democrat), William Lindstedt (Democrat), Kyle Mullica (Democrat), and Cleave Simpson (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 132?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 132?
Track SB 132 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 132

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 132

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →