HB 1005 — Worker Protection Collective Bargaining
Last action — Governor Vetoed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 19, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
62 sponsors
42 primary, 20 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (38 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill updates labor laws related to collective bargaining rights for employees.
The bill modifies the 'Labor Peace Act' to clarify employees' rights in collective bargaining, removing certain election requirements and emphasizing good faith negotiations. It also states that refusing lawful proposals during negotiations isn’t an unfair labor practice if both parties have bargained in good faith.
What this means for you
- Workers: This means you have clearer rights to negotiate collectively on important work-related issues.
Summary
The act makes the following changes to the 'Labor Peace Act':Specifies that employees' right to bargain collectively includes the right to bargain collectively concerning any mandatory subject of bargaining;Eliminates the requirement for a second election to negotiate a union security agreement clause in the collective bargaining process;Declares that it is not an unfair labor practice for an employer to refuse to agree to a lawful proposal made by the exclusive representative of the employees, or for the exclusive representative of the employees to refuse to agree to a lawful proposal made by the employer, concerning a mandatory subject of bargaining if the refusing party has bargained in good faith with the other party; andRequires employers and employees, through their exclusive representative, to bargain in good faith.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
265 added · 312 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment adds a note regarding the process for the bill HB 1005, indicating that it is now ready for signatures from legislative officers and the Governor. This change underscores the bill's progress through the legislative process and ensures that the public can check on its status and any actions taken by the Governor. This transparency is important because it keeps citizens informed about legislation that may impact them.
SecondNOTE: Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
26-0311.01This Joshbill Schultzhas x5486been HOUSEprepared BILLfor 26-1005the HOUSEsignatures SPONSORSHIPof MabreyandBacon,the Duran,Boesenecker,Brown,Camacho,Clifford,Espenoza,Froelich,appropriate Garcia,Gilchrist,Hamrick,Jackson,Lieder,Lindsay,Lukens,Martinez,Mauro,McCormick,legislative Phillips,officers Rydin, Sirota, Stewart K., Stewart R., Titone, Velasco, Woodrow, Zokaie, Carter, English, Goldstein, Joseph, McCluskie, Nguyen, Paschal, Rutinel, Smith, Story, Willford SENATE SPONSORSHIP Danielson and Jodeh,the Bridges,Governor. Cutter, Exum, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Kipp, Kolker, Lindstedt, Marchman, Sullivan, Wallace, Weissman, Amabile, Ball, Benavidez, Coleman, Daugherty, Mullica, Roberts, Rodriguez, Snyder d d e m 2 T n 2 A U , E i y House Committees Senate Committees S a a Business Affairs & Labor Business, Labor, & Technology e M Finance Appropriations d Appropriations 3 d A BILL FOR AN ACT d e 6 C ONCERNINGMEASURESTOREDUCEBARRIERSINTHE "L ABOR P EACE E a 0 A U 0 N n l A CT " TO PROMOTE GOOD FAITH COLLECTIVE BARGAINING S d p e A NEGOTIATIONS ,AND ,INCONNECTIONTHEREWITH ,REDUCINGAN d APPROPRIATION .
BillTo Summarydetermine dwhether dthe eGovernor 2has (Note:signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
ThisHOUSE summaryBILL applies26-1005 toBY thisREPRESENTATIVE(S) billMabrey as introduced and doesBacon, EDuran, aBoesenecker, 2Brown,Camacho,Clifford,Espenoza,Froelich,Garcia,Gilchrist,Hamrick, notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.IfthisbillJackson,Lieder,Lindsay, SLukens,Martinez,Mauro,McCormick,Phillips, URydin, 9Sirota, OStewart nK., hStewart passesR., thirdTitone, readingVelasco, inWoodrow, theZokaie, houseCarter,English,Goldstein,Joseph,Nguyen,Paschal,Rutinel,Smith,Story, ofWillford, introduction,McCluskie; a bill summary that H a r applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at e M r http://leg.colorado.gov.) 3 The bill makes the following changes to the "Labor Peace Act":
!also SpecifiesSENATOR(S) thatDanielson employees'and rightJodeh, toBridges, bargainCutter, collectivelyExum, gGonzales iJ., 6Hinrichsen, includesKipp, theKolker, rightLindstedt, toMarchman, bargainSullivan, collectivelyWallace, concerningWeissman, anyAmabile, aBall, 0Benavidez, SDaugherty, RMullica, ,Roberts, URodriguez, dSnyder, 6Coleman. H 2 r Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
DoubleCONCERNINGMEASURESTOREDUCEBARRIERSINTHE underlining"LABOR denotesPEACE SENATEA amendment.CT" TO PROMOTE GOOD FAITH COLLECTIVE BARGAINING NEGOTIATIONS , AND ,IN CONNECTION THEREWITH ,REDUCING AN APPROPRIATION .
e a Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n M Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
e A mandatory subject of bargaining;
! Eliminates the requirement for a second election to negotiate a union security agreement clause in the collective bargaining process;
! Declares that it is not an unfair labor practice for an employer to refuse to agree to a lawful proposal made by the exclusive representative of the employees, or for the exclusiverepresentativeoftheemployeestorefusetoagree to a lawful proposal made by the employer, concerning a mandatory subject of bargaining if the refusing party has bargained in good faith with the other party;
and ! Requiresemployersandemployees,throughtheirexclusive representative, to bargain in good faith.
SECTIONSECTION1. 1.
InInColoradoRevisedStatutes,8-3-102,amend(1)(a), Colorado Revised Statutes, 8-3-102, amend (1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(c), and (1)(e) as follows:
(1)________ TheCapital publicletters policyor ofbold the& stateitalic asnumbers toindicate employmentnew relationsmaterial andadded collectivebargaining,inthefurtheranceofwhichthisarticle3isenacted, is declared to beexisting aslaw; follows:
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
(1) The public policy of the state as to employment relations and collective bargaining, in the furtherance of which this article 3 is enacted, is declared to be as follows:
These three interestsaretoaconsiderableextentinterrelated.Itisthepolicyof thestate to protect and promote each of these interests arewith due regard to athe considerablesituation extentand interrelated.to the rights of the othTHE RIGHTS OF ALL INVOLVED .
the(b) policyIndustrial ofpeace, theregular stateand toadequate protectandpromoteeachofincomeAIR theseWAGES interestsAND withBENEFITS duefor regard to the situationemployee, and touninterrupted theproduction rights of thegoods othersRIGHTSand OFservices ALLare INVOLVEDpromotive .ofPROMOTE all of these interests.
(b)They Industrial peace, regular and adequate income FAIR WAGES AND BENEFITS for the employee, and uninterrupted production of goods and services are promotivelargely ofPROMOTEdependentuponthemaintenanceoffair,friendly,andmutuallysatisfactory allGOODFAITH ofemploymentrelationsandtheavailabilityofsuitablemachinery theseforthepeacefuladjustmentofwhateverlegitimatecontroversiesmayarise. interests.
TheyIt areis largelyrecognized dependentthat uponcertain theemployers, maintenanceincluding of fair, friendly, and mutually satisfactoryGOOD FAITH employment relations and the availability of suitable machinery for the peaceful adjustment of whatever legitimate -2- 1005 controversiesmayarise.Itisrecognizedthatcertainemployers,including farmers and farmer cooperatives, in addition to their general employer problems,facespecialproblemsarisingfromperishablecommoditiesandproblems, seasonalface productionspecial whichproblems requirearising adequatefrom consideration.sperishable alsocommodities recognized that whatever may be the rights of disputants with respect to each other in any controversy regarding employment relations, they should not be permitted in the conduct of their controversy to intrude directly or indirectly into the primary rights of third parties to earn a livelihood, transact business, andengageintheordinaryaffairsof life by any lawful means and freeseasonal fromproduction molestation,rference,which intimidation,require restraint,adequate orconsideration. coercion.
(c)It Negotiationsis oTermsalso andrecognized conditionsthat whatever maybetherightsofdisputantswithrespecttoeachotherinanycontroversy regardingemploymentrelations,theyshouldnotbepermittedintheconduct of worktheir shouldBEcontroversy NEGOTIATEDto INintrude GOODdirectly FAITHor BYindirectly ALLinto PARTIESthe ANDresultprimary fromrights voluntaryof agreementthird betweenparties ANto employerearn a livelihood, transact business, and employeeengage ITSin EMPLOYEESthe ANDordinary WITHOUTaffairs UNDUEof INTERFERENCElife BYby THEany STATElawful .means and free from molestation, interference, intimidation, restraint, or coercion.
For(c) theNegotiations purpose of suchTerms negotiation,and anconditions employeeof hasPLOYEESwork HAVEshould theBE right,NEGOTIATED ifIN heGOOD desiresFAITH DESIRED,BY toALL associatePARTIES withAND otherEACHresult OTHERfrom involuntary organizingagreement andbetween bargainingAN collectivelyemployer throughand representativesemployee ofITS his ownTHE EMPLOYEES 'AND freeWITHOUT choosingUNDUE withoutINTERFERENCE intimidationBY orTHE coercionSTATE from. any source.
(e)For Inordertopreserveandpromotetheinterestsofthepublic,the employee EMPLOYEES , and the employerpurpose alike, the state shall establish standards of fairsuch conductnegotiation, inan employmentemployee relationshas andEMPLOYEES provideHAVE athe convenient,right, expeditious,if andhe impartialdesires tribunalDESIRED by,toassociatewithothers whichEACHOTHER theseinorganizingandbargaining interestscollectively maythrough haverepresentatives their respective rights and obligations adjudicated, without limiting the jurisdiction of thehis courtsown toTHE protectEMPLOYEES propertyT' VIOLENCEfree ,choosing andwithout tointimidation preventor andcoercion punishfrom theany commissionsource. of unlawful acts.
-3-(e) 1005In Whilelimitingindividualandgrouprightsofaggressionanddefense,theorder stateto substitutespreserve processesand promote the interests of justicethe forpublic, the moreemployee primitiveEMPLOYEES methods, and the employer alike, the state shall establish standardsoffairconductinemploymentrelationsandprovideaconvenient, expeditious, and impartial tribunal bywhich these interests mayhave their PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 26-1005 respective rights and obligations adjudicated, without limiting the jurisdiction of trialthe bycourts combat.to protect property PREVENT VIOLENCE , and to prevent and punish the commission of unlawful acts.
While limiting individual and group rights of aggression and defense, the state substitutes processes of justice for the more primitive methods of trial by combat.
In accordance with the provisions ofthisof articlARTICLEthis article ARTICLE 3, employees have the right of self-organization and thetherighttoform,join, rightor toassistlabororganizations;tobargaincollectively, form,INCLUDINGTHERIGHTTO join,BARGAIN orCOLLECTIVELY assistCONCERNING laborANY organizations;MANDATORY SUBJECT OF BARGAINING , through representatives of their own free choosing;
and to bargainengage collectINCLUDINGin THElawful, RIGHTconcerted TOactivities BARGAINfor COLLECTIVELYthe CONCERNINGpurpose ANY MANDATORY SUBJECT OF BARGAINING , through representatives of their own free choosing;andtoengageinlawful,concerted activities for thepurposeof collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection.
Each employee alsohastherighttorefrainfromanyofalso suchactivities.Therightsofeachhas employeethe areright essentialto rights,refrainfromanyof and nothing contained in this article ARTICLE 3shallbesoconstruedastoinfringeuponorhaveanyoperation against or in conflict with such rights.activities.
The rights of each employee are essential rights, and nothing contained in this articleTICLE 3 shall be so construed as to infringe upon or have any operation against or in conflict with such rights.
(c) (I) Encourage or discourage membership in any A labor organization,employeeagency,committee,association,orrepresentationorganization, employee agency, committee, association, or representation plan by discrimination in regard to hiring, tenure, or other terms or conditions of employment;
except that an employer shall not be prohibited from entering into an all-union agreement with the -4-representatives 1005of representativeshis THEEMPLOYER 'Semployeesinacollectivebargainingunit.ifsuchall-union agreement is approved by the affirmative vote of hisTHEat EMPLOYERleast 'Sa majority of all the employees eligible to vote or three-quarters or more of the employees who actually voted, whichever is greater, by secret ballot in afavor collectiveof bargainingsuch unit.PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1005 all-union agreement in an election provided for in this paragraph (c) conducted under the supervision of the director.
ifWhere such all-union agreement is approved by the affirmativevoteofatleastamajorityofalltheemployeeseligibletovotecollective orthree-quartersormoreoftheemployeeswhoactuallyvoted,whicheverbargainingunitinvolvediscurrentlyrecognizedundersections8or9ofthe is greater, by secret ballot in favor of such all-union agreement in an election provided for in this paragraph (c) conducted under the supervisionofthedirector.Wherethecollectivebargainingunitinvolved is currently recognized under sections 8 or 9 of the "National Labor Relations Act", as amended, (49 Stat.
136), or where the collective bargaining unit involved is currentlycurrentlyrecognized recognized by reason of certificationbythedirectororthenationallaborrelationsboard,orwherecertification bythe director or the national labor relations board, or where such units were so recognized at the time of an election provided for in this paragraph (c), there is and shall be deemed to have been no need for a certification election as a precedent to an election provided for in this paragraphparagraph(c) (c) in such collective bargaining unitunitontheissueof onanall-union theagreement.Theemployeesinsucharecognizedorcertifiedunitwithinthis issuestateshallbetheonlyemployeeseligibletovoteinanelectionprovidedfor of an all-unionagreement.Theemployeesinsucharecognizedorcertifiedunit withinthisstateshallbetheonlyemployeeseligibletovoteinanelection provided for in this paragraph (c) held in such unit.
(II)(II)(A) (A)Anyagreement Any agreement as defined in section 8-3-104 (1.5) between an employer and a labor organization in existence on June 29, 1977, which has not been voted upon by the employees covered by it may, by written mutual agreement of such employer and labor organization,beratifiedanduponsuchratificationorganization, be ratified and upon such ratification shall be filedwiththefiled with the director.
Any agreement as defined in section 8-3-104 (1.5) between an employer and a labor organizationorganizationinexistenceonJune29,1977,whichhasnotbeenratifiedand in existence on June 29, 1977, which has not been ratified and filed, as provided in this subsection (1)(c)(II), shall not be legal, valid, or enforceableenforceableduringtheremainingtermofthatlaborcontractunlessanduntil duringeithertheemployer,thelabororganization,oratleasttwentypercentof the remainingemployees termcovered ofby thatsuch -5-agreement 1005file laborcontractunlessanduntileithertheemployer,thelabororganization,a orpetition atupon leastforms twentyprovided percentby of the employeesdivision, covereddemanding byan suchelection agreement fileapetitionuponformsprovidedbythedivision,demandinganelection submitting the question of the all-union agreement to the employees covered bybysuch such agreement and said agreement is approved by the affirmativevoteofatleastamajorityofaffirmative alltheemployeeseligibletovotevote orthree-quartersormoreoftheemployeeswhoactuallyvoted,whicheverof at least a majority of all the employees eligible to vote or three-quarters or more of the employees who actually voted, whichever is greater, by secret ballot in favor of such all-union agreement in an election provided for in this subsection (1)(c) conducted under the supervision of the director.
(B) Upon filing of such instrument of ratification with the director, the director shall certify that such agreement complies with the provisions of section 8-3-104 (1.5) notwithstanding the absence of any other election requirements of this article 3, and by virtue of such ratificationandcertification,suchagreementshallbedeemedlegal,valid,ratification andenforceabletotheextentpermittedundertheprovisionsofthisarticleand certification, such agreement shall be deemed legal, valid, and enforceable to the extent permitted under the provisions of this article 3, subject to the provisions of subsection (1)(c)(II)(D) of this section.
(C)PAGE Within4-HOUSE twoBILL weeks26-1005 after(C) theWithintwoweeksafterthecertificationbythedirectorprovided certification by the director provided for in sub-subparagraph (B) of this subparagraph (II), the employer which is a party to such agreement shall post or give written notice to all employeesemployeescoveredbysuch covered by such agreement on thethedateof dateratificationof ofthefact ratificationthattheagreementhasbeenratifiedandcertifiedpursuanttotheprovisions ofofthissubparagraph(II)andoftherightofsuchemployeestofileapetition the fact that the agreement has been ratified and certified pursuant to the provisions of this subparagraph (II) and of the right of such employees to file a petition demanding an election as provided in sub-subparagraph(D)ofsub-subparagraph thissubparagraph(II).Proof(D) of givingofthis noticesubparagraph shall be filed with the director within twenty days after the certification bythedirectorprovidedforinsub-subparagraph(B)ofthissubparagraph -6- 1005 (II).
(D)Proof Withinof forty-fivegiving daysof afternotice theshall certificationbe byfiled with the director providedwithin for in sub-subparagraph (B) of this subparagraph (II) twenty percentdays ofafter the employeescertification covered bysuch agreement mayfile a petition, upon forms provided by the division,director demandingprovided anfor electionin submittingsub-subparagraph the(B) question of ratificationthis ofsubparagraph such(II). agreement to the employees covered by such agreement.
If(D) ratificationWithin offorty-five thedays agreementafter isthe approvedcertification by the affirmativevoteofdirector atleastamajorityofalltheemployeeseligibletovoteprovided orthree-quartersormoreoftheemployeeswhoactuallyvoted,whicheverfor isin greater,sub-subparagraph in(B) saidof election,this subparagraph (II) twenty percent of the agreementemployees shallcovered beby conclusivelysuch deemedagreement ratified.Suchelectionshallbeheldaspromptlyaspossiblefollowingthemay filingfile ofa thepetition, petition.uponformsprovidedbythedivision,demandinganelectionsubmittingthe questionofratificationofsuchagreementtotheemployeescoveredbysuch agreement.
InIf ratification of the eventagreement thatis approved by the affirmative vote of at least a certifiedmajority contractof expiresall the employees eligible to vote or isthree-quarters terminatedor priormore toof the conductingemployees ofwho suchactually anvoted, election,whichever suchis certificationgreater, shallbeapplicabletoanysubsequentagreementbetweenthesamepartiesin untilsaid suchelection, electionthe mayagreement shall be held.conclusively deemed ratified.
Show all 66 changed lines (26 more)
(III)Such Theelection director shall declarebe anyheld suchunion agreement terminated whenever (A) He THE DIRECTORfinds that the labor organization involved HAS unreasonably has refused to receive as apromptly membAN employee of suchTHE employer, and any persoAN interesteINDIVIDUAL may come before the director, as providedpossible infollowing section 8-3-110, and ask the performancefiling of thisthe duty.petition.
orIn (B) The employer or twentypercent of the employeesevent coveredthat by such agreement file a petitioncertified withcontract theexpires directoror onis formsterminated providedprior bytheto divisionthe seekingconducting toof revoke such all-union agreement and, in an electionelection, conductedsuch undercertification theshall supervisionbe ofapplicable theto director,any theresubsequent isagreement notbetween anthe affirmativevoteofatleastamajorityofsame alltheemployeeseligibletovoteparties -7-until 1005 orthree-quartersormoreoftheemployeeswhoactuallyvoted,whichever is greater, in such election bymay secretbe ballotheld. in favor of such all-union agreement.
Such(III) petitionThe mayonlybedirector filedshall withindeclare aany timesuchAN periodall-union betweenagreement oneterminated hundredwhenever twenty(A) andHe oneTHEDIRECTOR hundredfindsthatthelabororganizationinvolved fiveHAS daysunreasonablyhas priorrefused to thereceive endas of the collective bargaining agreement or prior to a triennialmember anniversaryofany theAN dateemployee of such agreement,THE employer, and theanyperson divisionAN mustinterestedINDIVIDUAL completemaycome saidbefore electionthedirector,asprovidedinsection8-3-110,andasktheperformanceofthis withinduty. sixty days prior to the termination or triennial anniversary of said collective bargaining agreement.
or (B) The employer or twenty percent of the employees covered by such agreement file a petition with the director mayon conductforms provided by the division seeking to revoke such all-union agreement and, in an election withinconducted aunder collectivethe bargainingsupervision unitof nothe moredirector, oftenthere thanis oncenot duringan theaffirmative termvote of anycollectiveat bargainingleast agreementa majority of all the employees eligible to vote or oncePAGE everythree5-HOUSE yearsBILL in26-1005 thethree-quarters caseor more of agreementsthe foremployees awho periodactually longervoted, thanwhichever threeis years.greater, in such election by secret ballot in favor of such all-union agreement.
(IV)Such Thedirectorshallprovideapetition meansmay bywhichemployeesmayonly submitbe confidentialfiled petitionswithin for an election under this paragraph (c), a meansforverifyingtheemployment,status,andeligibilityofpetitioners,time andameansfordeterminingthesufficiencyofsuchpetitionswithrespectperiod tobetween theone hundred twenty percentand signatureone requirement,hundred allfive ofdays whichprior shallto be accomplished without disclosing the identificationend of suchthe petitioners,collective exceptasallowedundersubparagraph(V)ofthisparagraph(c).Thisdutybargaining shallagreement applytoor petitionsprior filed pursuant to subparagrapha (II)(A),triennial (II)(D),anniversary orof (III)(B)the ofdateofsuchagreement,andthedivisionmustcompletesaidelectionwithin thissixtydayspriortotheterminationortriennialanniversaryofsaidcollective paragraphbargaining (c).agreement.
SECTION4.The director may conduct an election within a collective bargaining unit no more often than once during the term of any collective bargaining agreement or once every three years in the case of agreements for a period longer than three years.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,8-3-109,amend(3);(IV) The director shall provide a means by which employees may submit confidential petitions for an election under this paragraph (c), a means for verifying the employment, status, and eligibility of petitioners, and a means for determining the sufficiency of such petitions with respect to the twenty percent signature requirement, all of which shall be accomplished without disclosing the identification of such petitioners, except as allowed under subparagraph (V) of this paragraph (c).
This duty shall apply to petitions filed pursuant to subparagraph (II)(A), (II)(D), or (III)(B) of this paragraph (c).
SECTION 4.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 8-3-109, amend (3);
(3) It shall not beNOTanbeIS NOT an unfair labor practice for an employer engagedengagedprimarilyinthebuilding primarily in the building and construction industrytoindustrytoenterintoan enter into an all-union agreement.
except an agreement providing for an agencyagencyshop -8- 1005 shop or modified agency shop, with a labor organization, which agreement is limited in its coverage to employees who, upon their employment, will be engaged in the building and construction industry, if a copyofcopy of such agreement is filed with the director and certified byhimby him as provided in section 8-3-108 (1)(c)(II)(B).
Such agreement may be ratified as provided ininsection section8-3-108(1)(c)(II)(C)orterminatedbythedirectorasprovidedin 8-3-108 (1)(c)(II)(C) or terminated by the director as provided in section 8-3-108 (1)(c)(III).
(4) I T IS NOT AN UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE FOR AN EMPLOYER TO PAGE 6-HOUSE BILL 26-1005 REFUSE TO AGREE TO A LAWFUL PROPOSAL MADE BY THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE EMPLOYEES , OR FOR THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE EMPLOYEES TO REFUSE TO AGREE TO A LAWFUL PROPOSALMADEBYTHEEMPLOYERPROPOSAL ,CONCERNINGAMANDATORYSUBJECTMADE BY THE EMPLOYER , CONCERNING A MANDATORY SUBJECT OF BARGAINING IF THE REFUSING PARTY HAS BARGAINED IN GOOD FAITH WITH THE OTHER PARTY.PARTY .
MPLOYERSEMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES ,THROUGH THEIR EXCLUSIVEREPRESENTATIVEEXCLUSIVE HAVETHEOBLIGATIONTOBARGAININGOODREPRESENTATIVE FAITH.,HAVE THE OBLIGATION TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH .
HE OBLIGATION TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH DOES NOT COMPEL EITHER PARTY TO AGREE TO A PROPOSAL OR MAKE A CONCESSI.NCONCESSION SECTION. 5.
SECTION 5.
(1)Exceptasprovidedinsubsection(2)of(1) thissection,toimplementthisExcept act,as theprovided generalin fundsubsection appropriation(2) madeof inthis thesection, annualto generalimplement appropriationthis act,thegeneralfundappropriationmadeintheannualgeneralappropriation act for the 2026-27 state fiscal year to the department of labor and employment for use by the division of labor standards and statistics for program costs related to labor standards is decreased by $26,865, and the related FTE is decreased by 0.2 FTE.
-9- 1005 (a) The amount of general fund appropriation made in the annual generalgeneralappropriationactforthe2026-27statefiscalyeartothedepartment appropriation act for the 2026-27 state fiscal year to the department of labor and employment for use by the division of labor standardsandstatisticsforprogramcostsrelatedtolaborstandardsislessstandards thanand thestatisticsforprogramcostsrelatedtolaborstandardsislessthantheamount amount of the adjustment required in subsection (1) of this section;
or (b) TheTheannualgeneralappropriationactforthe2026-27statefiscal annual general appropriation act for the 2026-27 state fiscal year does not include an appropriation to the department of labor and employment for use by the division of labor standards and statistics for program costs related to labor standards.
except that section 5 of this act takes effect onlyonlyif if the annual general appropriation act for the 2026-27 state fiscal year becomes law, in which case section5takeseffectupontheeffectivesection 5 takes effect upon the effective date of this act or upon the effective date of the annual general appropriation act for state fiscal year 2026-27, whichever is later.
(2)PAGE This7-HOUSE actBILL applies26-1005 to(2) collectiveThisactappliestocollectivebargainingagreementsenteredinto bargaining agreements entered into or renewed on or after the effective date of this act.
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservationofthepublicpeace,health,orsafetyorforappropriationsforpreservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
-10-____________________________ 1005____________________________ Julie McCluskie James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________ ____________________________ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 8-HOUSE BILL 26-1005
Show all 66 changed rows (26 more)
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Vetoed
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 04/30/2026 - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Unamended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
House Committee on Finance Refer Unamended to Appropriations
-
House Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Unamended to Finance
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor
Sponsors
- Adrienne Benavidez · Cosponsor
- M. Snyder · Cosponsor
- R. Rodriguez · Cosponsor
- D. Roberts · Cosponsor
- K. Mullica · Cosponsor
- L. Daugherty · Cosponsor
- J. Coleman · Cosponsor
- M. Ball · Cosponsor
- J. Amabile · Cosponsor
- M. Weissman · Primary
- K. Wallace · Primary
- T. Sullivan · Primary
- J. Marchman · Primary
- W. Lindstedt · Primary
- C. Kolker · Primary
- C. Kipp · Primary
- N. Hinrichsen · Primary
- J. Gonzales · Primary
- T. Exum · Primary
- L. Cutter · Primary
- J. Bridges · Primary
- L. García · Primary
- Cecelia Espenoza · Primary
- Lindsay Gilchrist · Primary
- Eliza Hamrick · Primary
- Jamie Jackson · Primary
- Mandy Lindsay · Primary
- Matthew Martinez · Primary
- Tisha Mauro · Primary
- Karen McCormick · Primary
- Jacque Phillips · Primary
- Gretchen Rydin · Primary
- Katie Stewart · Primary
- Rebekah Stewart · Primary
- Brianna Titone · Primary
- Elizabeth Velasco · Primary
- Steven Woodrow · Primary
- Michael Carter · Cosponsor
- Lori Goldstein · Cosponsor
- Junie Joseph · Cosponsor
- Julie McCluskie · Cosponsor
- Kenny Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Amy Paschal · Cosponsor
- Manny Rutinel · Cosponsor
- Lesley Smith · Cosponsor
- Tammy Story · Cosponsor
- Jenny Willford · Cosponsor
- I. Jodeh · Primary
- J. Danielson · Primary
- Jennifer Bacon · Primary
- Javier Mabrey · Primary
- Andrew Boesenecker · Primary
- Kyle Brown · Primary
- Sean Camacho · Primary
- Chad Clifford · Primary
- Meg Froelich · Primary
- Emily Sirota · Primary
- Regina English · Cosponsor
- Monica Duran · Primary
- Sheila Lieder · Primary
- Meghan Lukens · Primary
- Yara Zokaie · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →42 sponsors · 20 co-sponsors · 39 not signed on · 18 voted No
Sponsors (42)
- M. Weissman
- K. Wallace
- T. Sullivan
- J. Marchman
- W. Lindstedt
- C. Kolker
- C. Kipp
- N. Hinrichsen
- J. Gonzales
- T. Exum
- L. Cutter
- J. Bridges
- L. García
- Cecelia Espenoza Democrat
- Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat
- Eliza Hamrick Democrat
- Jamie Jackson Democrat
- Mandy Lindsay Democrat
- Matthew Martinez Democrat
- Tisha Mauro Democrat
- Karen McCormick Democrat
- Jacque Phillips Democrat
- Gretchen Rydin Democrat
- Katie Stewart Democrat
- Rebekah Stewart Democrat
- Brianna Titone Democrat
- Elizabeth Velasco Democrat
- Steven Woodrow Democrat
- I. Jodeh
- J. Danielson
- Jennifer Bacon Democrat
- Javier Mabrey Democrat
- Andrew Boesenecker Democrat
- Kyle Brown Democrat
- Sean Camacho Democrat
- Chad Clifford Democrat
- Meg Froelich Democrat
- Emily Sirota Democrat
- Monica Duran Democrat
- Sheila Lieder Democrat
- Meghan Lukens Democrat
- Yara Zokaie Democrat
Co-sponsors (20)
- Adrienne Benavidez
- M. Snyder
- R. Rodriguez
- D. Roberts
- K. Mullica
- L. Daugherty
- J. Coleman
- M. Ball
- J. Amabile
- Michael Carter Democrat
- Lori Goldstein Democrat
- Junie Joseph Democrat
- Julie McCluskie Democrat
- Kenny Nguyen Democrat
- Amy Paschal Democrat
- Manny Rutinel Democrat
- Lesley Smith Democrat
- Tammy Story Democrat
- Jenny Willford Democrat
- Regina English Democrat
Not signed on (39)
39 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 39 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 9% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Gonzalez | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Gretchen Rydin | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Nay |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
| Ryan Gonzalez | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1005 do?
- The act makes the following changes to the 'Labor Peace Act':Specifies that employees' right to bargain collectively includes the right to bargain collectively concerning any mandatory subject of bargaining;Eliminates the requirement for a second election to negotiate a union security agreement clause in the collective bargaining process;Declares that it is not an unfair labor practice for an employer to refuse to agree to a lawful proposal made by the exclusive representative of the employees, or for the exclusive representative of the employees to refuse to agree to a lawful proposal made by the employer, concerning a mandatory subject of bargaining if the refusing party has bargained in good faith with the other party; andRequires employers and employees, through their exclusive representative, to bargain in good faith.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors HB 1005?
- HB 1005 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, M. Snyder, R. Rodriguez, D. Roberts, K. Mullica, L. Daugherty, J. Coleman, M. Ball, J. Amabile, M. Weissman, K. Wallace, T. Sullivan, J. Marchman, W. Lindstedt, C. Kolker, C. Kipp, N. Hinrichsen, J. Gonzales, T. Exum, L. Cutter, J. Bridges, L. García, Cecelia Espenoza (Democrat), Lindsay Gilchrist (Democrat), Eliza Hamrick (Democrat), Jamie Jackson (Democrat), Mandy Lindsay (Democrat), Matthew Martinez (Democrat), Tisha Mauro (Democrat), Karen McCormick (Democrat), Jacque Phillips (Democrat), Gretchen Rydin (Democrat), Katie Stewart (Democrat), Rebekah Stewart (Democrat), Brianna Titone (Democrat), Elizabeth Velasco (Democrat), Steven Woodrow (Democrat), Michael Carter (Democrat), Lori Goldstein (Democrat), Junie Joseph (Democrat), Julie McCluskie (Democrat), Kenny Nguyen (Democrat), Amy Paschal (Democrat), Manny Rutinel (Democrat), Lesley Smith (Democrat), Tammy Story (Democrat), Jenny Willford (Democrat), I. Jodeh, J. Danielson, Jennifer Bacon (Democrat), Javier Mabrey (Democrat), Andrew Boesenecker (Democrat), Kyle Brown (Democrat), Sean Camacho (Democrat), Chad Clifford (Democrat), Meg Froelich (Democrat), Emily Sirota (Democrat), Regina English (Democrat), Monica Duran (Democrat), Sheila Lieder (Democrat), Meghan Lukens (Democrat), and Yara Zokaie (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1005?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1005?
- Track HB 1005 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1005
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1005
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →