SB 177 — Access Adjoining Property to Repair or Maintain
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 22, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 28, 2026.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
12 sponsors
4 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill allows homeowners to seek court access to adjacent properties for necessary repairs.
This legislation enables owners of single-family homes to petition a court for permission to access adjoining properties if they are denied access needed for repairs. Homeowners must demonstrate attempts to negotiate access and provide details about the repairs required.
What this means for you
- Families: This bill provides a legal avenue for families to address necessary home repairs that require access to adjacent properties.
Summary
The act creates a process for an owner of a single-family residence to petition a district court for limited access to an adjoining property to complete repairs or maintenance to the single-family residence if the owner of the adjoining property has denied such access. The owner of a single-family residence is encouraged to engage the adjoining property owner in alternative dispute resolution, such as mediation, prior to petitioning the court. In petitioning the court, the owner of a single-family residence must demonstrate that they have made reasonable efforts to obtain permission from the adjoining property owner to access the adjoining property. A petitioner must also specify the nature of the repairs or maintenance they seek to complete and describe why they cannot complete the repairs or maintenance without access to the adjoining property. If the court determines that access to the adjoining property is necessary to repair or maintain the petitioner's property and will not negatively affect an easement on the adjoining property, the court shall grant access to the adjoining property as necessary to allow completion of the repair or maintenance and shall prescribe the conditions and duration of the petitioner's access. The act does not apply to an adjoining property that is owned or controlled by the federal government, the state, or a political subdivision of the state.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
64 added · 72 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 177 clarifies the language around a property owner's ability to request access to a neighbor's property for necessary repairs. It defines key terms such as "requesting owner," "adjoining owner," and what it means to "refuse" a request for access. These changes aim to provide clearer definitions and procedures, which may help property owners more easily navigate the process of making repairs on their properties without facing legal obstacles. This matters because it ensures that property owners have a defined way to seek necessary access while also protecting the rights of their neighbors.
NOTE:
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
CONCERNING A PROPERTY OWNEROWNER'S S ABILITY TO PETITION A COURT FOR LIMITED ACCESS TO AN ADJOINING PROPERTY TO MAKE REPAIRSREPAIRS. .
Be it enacted by the GeneralGeneralAssembly Assemblyofthe of the State ofofColorado: Colorado:
(1) AAS S USED IN THIS SECTIONSECTION, , UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRESREQUIRES: :
(a) "A"ADJOINING DJOININGOWNER" OWNERMEANS "MEANS THE OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY THAT ADJOINS A REQUESTING OWNEROWNER'S 'S PROPERTY AND ONTO WHICH A REQUESTING OWNER SEEKS ENTRYENTRY. .
________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsdeletionsfrom from existing law andandsuch such material is notnotpart part of the act.
(b) "REFUSE"REFUSE" "MEANSMEANS AN ADJOINING OWNEROWNER'S: S:
(I) DENIAL TO THE REQUESTING OWNEROWNER, ,VERBALLYVERBALLY OR IN WRITINGWRITING, , OF ACCESS TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCOMPLISHING REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE OF THE REQUESTING OWNEROWNER'S SPROPERTY;OR PROPERTY(11) ;ORFAILURE (II) F AILURE TO RESPOND WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF RECEIPT OF WRITTEN NOTICE SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL FROM THE REQUESTING OWNER TOTHEADJOININGOWNERREGARDINGACCESSTOTHEADJOININGPROPERTYTOTHEADJOININGOWNERREGARDINGACCESS TOTHEADJOINING PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCOMPLISHING REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE OF THE REQUESTING OWNEROWNER'S 'S PROPERTY.
(c) "REQUESTING OWNEROWNER" "MEANSMEANS THE OWNER OF A SINGLESINGLE-FAMILY FAMILY RESIDENCE WHO SEEKS ENTRY ONTO AN ADJOINING PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSEOFACCOMPLISHINGREPAIRSORMAINTENANCEOFTHEREQUESTINGPURPOSEOFACCOMPLISHING OWNERREPAIRS SORMAINTENANCEOFTHE PROPERTYREQUESTING .OWNER'S PROPERTY.
(d)(d)"SINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENCE" "SINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENCEMEANS "MEANS APRIVATERESIDENCETHAT IS A SEPARATE BUILDING OR AN INDIVIDUAL RESIDENCE THAT IS PART OF A ROW OF RESIDENCES JOINED BY COMMON SIDEWALLSSIDEWALLS. .
(2) IIF F A REQUESTING OWNER SEEKS TO MAKE REPAIRS TO OR COMPLETE MAINTENANCE ON THE REQUESTING OWNEROWNER'S SPROPERTY, PROPERTY , THE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE CANNOT REASONABLY BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT ENTERING ONTO AN ADJOINING OWNEROWNER'S 'SPROPERTY, PROPERTYAND ,AND THE ADJOINING OWNER REFUSES TO PERMIT ENTRY ONTO THE ADJOINING OWNEROWNER'S SPROPERTYFORTHEPURPOSEOFTHEREPAIRORMAINTENANCEPROPERTY ,THEFORTHEPURPOSEOFTHEREPAIRORMAINTENANCE,THE REQUESTINGOWNERMAYPETITIONTHEREQUESTING OWNERMAY PETITION THE DISTRICT COURTOFTHECOURT COUNTYINOF THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED TO PERMIT THE REQUESTING OWNER TO ENTER ONTO THE ADJOINING OWNEROWNER'S S PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OF THE REQUESTING OWNEROWNER'S 'S PROPERTY.
(3) BEFORE BRINGING AN ACTION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)OF THIS SECTION, THE REQUESTING OWNER IS ENCOURAGED TO ENGAGE IN ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION, , SUCH AS MEDIATIONMEDIATION, , WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNEROWNER, ,TOTO ACCESS THE ADJOINING PROPERTY TO MAKE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCEMAINTENANCE. .
(a) THE REQUESTING OWNER MUST SPECIFY THE NATURE OF THE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE THEY SEEK TO COMPLETE AND DESCRIBE WHY THEREPAIRSORMAINTENANCECANNOTBEMADEWITHOUTACCESSINGTHETHE ADJOININGREPAIRS OWNEROR 'SMAINTENANCE CANNOT BE MADE WITHOUTACCESSING THE ADJOINING OWNER'S PROPERTY;
(b) THEREQUESTINGOWNERMUSTDEMONSTRATETHATTHEYHAVETHE REQUESTING OWNERMUST DEMONSTRATETHATTHEY HAVE MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM THE ADJOINING OWNER TO ACCESS THE ADJOINING OWNEROWNER'S S PROPERTY AND THAT THE ADJOINING OWNER HAS REFUSED SUCH ACCESSACCESS; ;AND (c) THEADJOININGOWNERMAYPRESENTEVIDENCETHATACCESSTO THE ADJOINING OWNER 'S PROPERTY IS NOT NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE .
(5)AND IF(c)THE THEADJOININGOWNERMAY COURTPRESENTEVIDENCETHATACCESS DETERMINES THAT ACCESS TO THE ADJOINING OWNEROWNER'S 'S PROPERTY IS NOT NECESSARY TO ALLOWCOMPLETE REPAIR TO OR MAINTENANCE ONTHEREQUESTINGOWNER SPROPERTYANDWILLNOTNEGATIVELYAFFECT ANY EASEMENT ON THE ADJOININGREPAIRS OWNER 'S PROPERTY,THE COURT SHALL GRANTACCESSASTHECOURTDEEMSNECESSARYTOALLOWCOMPLETIONOF THE REPAIR OR MAINTENANCEMAINTENANCE. .
(5) IF THE COURT SHALLDETERMINES PRESCRIBETHAT THEACCESS CONDITIONSTO ANDTHE DURATIONADJOINING OFOWNER'S THEPROPERTY REQUESTINGIS OWNERNECESSARY STO ACCESSALLOW REPAIR TO OR MAINTENANCE ONTHEREQUESTINGOWNER'S PROPERTYAND WILLNOTNEGATIVELY AFFECT ANY EASEMENT ON THE ADJOINING OWNEROWNER'S 'SPROPERTY, PROPERTYTHE ANDCOURT MAYSHALL REQUIREGRANTACCESS :AS THECOURTDEEMS NECESSARYTOALLOWCOMPLETION OF THE REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE.
(a)THE REASONABLECOURT NOTICESHALL TOTHEPRESCRIBE ADJOININGOWNERTHE INCONDITIONS ADVANCEAND DURATION OF THE REQUESTING OWNER'S ACCESS ;TO THE ADJOINING OWNER'S PROPERTY AND MAY REQUIRE:
(b)(a) REASONABLE COMPENSATIONNOTICE TO THE ADJOINING OWNER ;IN ADVANCE OF THE ACCESS;
(c)(b) THATREASONABLE THECOMPENSATION REQUESTINGTO OWNER PURCHASE INSURANCE OR POST BONDTOCOVERANYDAMAGETOPROPERTY ,PERSONALINJURY ,ORLOSSOF LIFE,THAT MAY OCCUR BECAUSE OF THE REPAIRADJOINING OROWNER; MAINTENANCE ;OR (d) ANY OTHER CONDITION DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE COURT .
(6)(c) THISTHAT SECTIONTHE DOESREQUESTING NOTOWNER APPLYPURCHASE IFINSURANCE THEOR ADJOININGPOST PROPERTYBONDTO ISCOVERANY OWNEDDAMAGETO ORPROPERTY, CONTROLLEDPERSONAL BYINJURY, THEORLOSS FEDERALOF GOVERNMENTLIFE, ,THETHAT STATEMAY ,OROCCUR ABECAUSE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STAT.REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE;
PAGEOR 3-SENATE(d) BILLANY 26-177OTHER SECTIONCONDITION 2.DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE COURT.
(6) THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY IF THE ADJOINING PROPERTY IS OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE STATE, OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE.
PA G E 3-SEN A TE BILL 26-177 SECTION 2.
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiodninety-day period after final adjournment ofofthe the general assembly(Augustassembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
except that, if a referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestatereferendum petition is filed pursuantto section 1(3) ofarticle V ofthe state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-177 approvedbythepeopleatthegeneralelectiontobeheldinNovember2026approved bythe people at the general electionto be held inNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date ofofthe the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
____________________________amesRashad ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________s ____________________________er Esther van Mourik Vanessa\ Reilly~ ~ V anesi11y SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________APPROVED (Dateo andnT Time)blko~ _________________________________________V h~ 26 ~ 202.f:ocltz:ooF1"' (D e and ·me) Jared S.
Polis GOVERNORGOVERNO OF THEOFCOLORADO STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 26-177
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
-
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
Sponsors
- Adrienne Benavidez · Primary
- A. Boesenecker · Cosponsor
- J. Mabrey · Primary
- L. Gilchrist · Primary
- Matt Ball · Primary
- James Coleman · Cosponsor
- Lisa Cutter · Cosponsor
- Julie Gonzales · Cosponsor
- Nick Hinrichsen · Cosponsor
- Cathy Kipp · Cosponsor
- Marc Snyder · Cosponsor
- Katie Wallace · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 89 not signed on · 13 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- Adrienne Benavidez
- J. Mabrey
- L. Gilchrist
- Matt Ball Democrat
Co-sponsors (8)
- A. Boesenecker
- James Coleman Democrat
- Lisa Cutter Democrat
- Julie Gonzales Democrat
- Nick Hinrichsen Democrat
- Cathy Kipp Democrat
- Marc Snyder Democrat
- Katie Wallace Democrat
Not signed on (89)
89 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 89 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 31% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
How each member voted (1)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 177 do?
- The act creates a process for an owner of a single-family residence to petition a district court for limited access to an adjoining property to complete repairs or maintenance to the single-family residence if the owner of the adjoining property has denied such access. The owner of a single-family residence is encouraged to engage the adjoining property owner in alternative dispute resolution, such as mediation, prior to petitioning the court. In petitioning the court, the owner of a single-family residence must demonstrate that they have made reasonable efforts to obtain permission from the adjoining property owner to access the adjoining property. A petitioner must also specify the nature of the repairs or maintenance they seek to complete and describe why they cannot complete the repairs or maintenance without access to the adjoining property. If the court determines that access to the adjoining property is necessary to repair or maintain the petitioner's property and will not negatively affect an easement on the adjoining property, the court shall grant access to the adjoining property as necessary to allow completion of the repair or maintenance and shall prescribe the conditions and duration of the petitioner's access. The act does not apply to an adjoining property that is owned or controlled by the federal government, the state, or a political subdivision of the state.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 177?
- SB 177 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, A. Boesenecker, J. Mabrey, L. Gilchrist, Matt Ball (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), Julie Gonzales (Democrat), Nick Hinrichsen (Democrat), Cathy Kipp (Democrat), Marc Snyder (Democrat), and Katie Wallace (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 177?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 22, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 177?
- Track SB 177 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 177
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 177
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →