Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted 8 D cosponsors

SB 177 — Access Adjoining Property to Repair or Maintain

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 22, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 28, 2026.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 12 sponsors

    4 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 7 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

The bill allows homeowners to seek court access to adjacent properties for necessary repairs.

This legislation enables owners of single-family homes to petition a court for permission to access adjoining properties if they are denied access needed for repairs. Homeowners must demonstrate attempts to negotiate access and provide details about the repairs required.

What this means for you
  • Families: This bill provides a legal avenue for families to address necessary home repairs that require access to adjacent properties.

Summary

The act creates a process for an owner of a single-family residence to petition a district court for limited access to an adjoining property to complete repairs or maintenance to the single-family residence if the owner of the adjoining property has denied such access. The owner of a single-family residence is encouraged to engage the adjoining property owner in alternative dispute resolution, such as mediation, prior to petitioning the court. In petitioning the court, the owner of a single-family residence must demonstrate that they have made reasonable efforts to obtain permission from the adjoining property owner to access the adjoining property. A petitioner must also specify the nature of the repairs or maintenance they seek to complete and describe why they cannot complete the repairs or maintenance without access to the adjoining property. If the court determines that access to the adjoining property is necessary to repair or maintain the petitioner's property and will not negatively affect an easement on the adjoining property, the court shall grant access to the adjoining property as necessary to allow completion of the repair or maintenance and shall prescribe the conditions and duration of the petitioner's access. The act does not apply to an adjoining property that is owned or controlled by the federal government, the state, or a political subdivision of the state.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

64 added · 72 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill SB 177 clarifies the language around a property owner's ability to request access to a neighbor's property for necessary repairs. It defines key terms such as "requesting owner," "adjoining owner," and what it means to "refuse" a request for access. These changes aim to provide clearer definitions and procedures, which may help property owners more easily navigate the process of making repairs on their properties without facing legal obstacles. This matters because it ensures that property owners have a defined way to seek necessary access while also protecting the rights of their neighbors.

→
Previous
Latest
NOTE:
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
CONCERNING A PROPERTY OWNER S ABILITY TO PETITION A COURT FOR LIMITED ACCESS TO AN ADJOINING PROPERTY TO MAKE REPAIRS .
CONCERNING A PROPERTY OWNER'S ABILITY TO PETITION A COURT FOR LIMITED ACCESS TO AN ADJOINING PROPERTY TO MAKE REPAIRS.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
Be it enacted by the GeneralAssembly ofthe State ofColorado:
(1) A S USED IN THIS SECTION , UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES :
(1) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:
(a) "A DJOINING OWNER "MEANS THE OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY THAT ADJOINS A REQUESTING OWNER 'S PROPERTY AND ONTO WHICH A REQUESTING OWNER SEEKS ENTRY .
(a) "ADJOINING OWNER" MEANS THE OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY THAT ADJOINS A REQUESTING OWNER'S PROPERTY AND ONTO WHICH A REQUESTING OWNER SEEKS ENTRY.
________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsfrom existing law andsuch material is notpart of the act.
(b) "REFUSE "MEANS AN ADJOINING OWNER S:
(b) "REFUSE" MEANS AN ADJOINING OWNER'S:
(I) DENIAL TO THE REQUESTING OWNER ,VERBALLY OR IN WRITING , OF ACCESS TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCOMPLISHING REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE OF THE REQUESTING OWNER S PROPERTY ;OR (II) F AILURE TO RESPOND WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF RECEIPT OF WRITTEN NOTICE SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL FROM THE REQUESTING OWNER TOTHEADJOININGOWNERREGARDINGACCESSTOTHEADJOININGPROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCOMPLISHING REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE OF THE REQUESTING OWNER 'S PROPERTY.
(I) DENIAL TO THE REQUESTING OWNER, VERBALLY OR IN WRITING, OF ACCESS TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCOMPLISHING REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE OF THE REQUESTING OWNER'S PROPERTY;OR (11) FAILURE TO RESPOND WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF RECEIPT OF WRITTEN NOTICE SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL FROM THE REQUESTING OWNER TOTHEADJOININGOWNERREGARDINGACCESS TOTHEADJOINING PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCOMPLISHING REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE OF THE REQUESTING OWNER'S PROPERTY.
(c) "REQUESTING OWNER "MEANS THE OWNER OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WHO SEEKS ENTRY ONTO AN ADJOINING PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSEOFACCOMPLISHINGREPAIRSORMAINTENANCEOFTHEREQUESTING OWNER S PROPERTY .
(c) "REQUESTING OWNER" MEANS THE OWNER OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WHO SEEKS ENTRY ONTO AN ADJOINING PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSEOFACCOMPLISHING REPAIRS ORMAINTENANCEOFTHE REQUESTING OWNER'S PROPERTY.
(d) "SINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENCE "MEANS APRIVATERESIDENCETHAT IS A SEPARATE BUILDING OR AN INDIVIDUAL RESIDENCE THAT IS PART OF A ROW OF RESIDENCES JOINED BY COMMON SIDEWALLS .
(d)"SINGLE-FAMILYRESIDENCE" MEANS APRIVATERESIDENCETHAT IS A SEPARATE BUILDING OR AN INDIVIDUAL RESIDENCE THAT IS PART OF A ROW OF RESIDENCES JOINED BY COMMON SIDEWALLS.
(2) I F A REQUESTING OWNER SEEKS TO MAKE REPAIRS TO OR COMPLETE MAINTENANCE ON THE REQUESTING OWNER S PROPERTY , THE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE CANNOT REASONABLY BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT ENTERING ONTO AN ADJOINING OWNER 'S PROPERTY ,AND THE ADJOINING OWNER REFUSES TO PERMIT ENTRY ONTO THE ADJOINING OWNER SPROPERTYFORTHEPURPOSEOFTHEREPAIRORMAINTENANCE ,THE REQUESTINGOWNERMAYPETITIONTHE DISTRICT COURTOFTHE COUNTYIN WHICH THE PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED TO PERMIT THE REQUESTING OWNER TO ENTER ONTO THE ADJOINING OWNER S PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OF THE REQUESTING OWNER 'S PROPERTY.
(2) IF A REQUESTING OWNER SEEKS TO MAKE REPAIRS TO OR COMPLETE MAINTENANCE ON THE REQUESTING OWNER'S PROPERTY, THE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE CANNOT REASONABLY BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT ENTERING ONTO AN ADJOINING OWNER'S PROPERTY, AND THE ADJOINING OWNER REFUSES TO PERMIT ENTRY ONTO THE ADJOINING OWNER'S PROPERTY FORTHEPURPOSEOFTHEREPAIRORMAINTENANCE,THE REQUESTING OWNERMAY PETITION THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COUNTY IN WHICH THE PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED TO PERMIT THE REQUESTING OWNER TO ENTER ONTO THE ADJOINING OWNER'S PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OF THE REQUESTING OWNER'S PROPERTY.
(3) BEFORE BRINGING AN ACTION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)OF THIS SECTION, THE REQUESTING OWNER IS ENCOURAGED TO ENGAGE IN ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION , SUCH AS MEDIATION , WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER ,TO ACCESS THE ADJOINING PROPERTY TO MAKE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE .
(3) BEFORE BRINGING AN ACTION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)OF THIS SECTION, THE REQUESTING OWNER IS ENCOURAGED TO ENGAGE IN ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION, SUCH AS MEDIATION, WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER, TO ACCESS THE ADJOINING PROPERTY TO MAKE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE.
(a) THE REQUESTING OWNER MUST SPECIFY THE NATURE OF THE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE THEY SEEK TO COMPLETE AND DESCRIBE WHY THEREPAIRSORMAINTENANCECANNOTBEMADEWITHOUTACCESSINGTHE ADJOINING OWNER 'S PROPERTY;
(a) THE REQUESTING OWNER MUST SPECIFY THE NATURE OF THE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE THEY SEEK TO COMPLETE AND DESCRIBE WHY THE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE CANNOT BE MADE WITHOUTACCESSING THE ADJOINING OWNER'S PROPERTY;
(b) THEREQUESTINGOWNERMUSTDEMONSTRATETHATTHEYHAVE MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM THE ADJOINING OWNER TO ACCESS THE ADJOINING OWNER S PROPERTY AND THAT THE ADJOINING OWNER HAS REFUSED SUCH ACCESS ;AND (c) THEADJOININGOWNERMAYPRESENTEVIDENCETHATACCESSTO THE ADJOINING OWNER 'S PROPERTY IS NOT NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE .
(b) THE REQUESTING OWNERMUST DEMONSTRATETHATTHEY HAVE MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN PERMISSION FROM THE ADJOINING OWNER TO ACCESS THE ADJOINING OWNER'S PROPERTY AND THAT THE ADJOINING OWNER HAS REFUSED SUCH ACCESS;
(5) IF THE COURT DETERMINES THAT ACCESS TO THE ADJOINING OWNER 'S PROPERTY IS NECESSARY TO ALLOW REPAIR TO OR MAINTENANCE ONTHEREQUESTINGOWNER SPROPERTYANDWILLNOTNEGATIVELYAFFECT ANY EASEMENT ON THE ADJOINING OWNER 'S PROPERTY,THE COURT SHALL GRANTACCESSASTHECOURTDEEMSNECESSARYTOALLOWCOMPLETIONOF THE REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE .
AND (c)THE ADJOININGOWNERMAY PRESENTEVIDENCETHATACCESS TO THE ADJOINING OWNER'S PROPERTY IS NOT NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE REPAIRS OR MAINTENANCE.
THE COURT SHALL PRESCRIBE THE CONDITIONS AND DURATION OF THE REQUESTING OWNER S ACCESS TO THE ADJOINING OWNER 'S PROPERTY AND MAY REQUIRE :
(5) IF THE COURT DETERMINES THAT ACCESS TO THE ADJOINING OWNER'S PROPERTY IS NECESSARY TO ALLOW REPAIR TO OR MAINTENANCE ONTHEREQUESTINGOWNER'S PROPERTYAND WILLNOTNEGATIVELY AFFECT ANY EASEMENT ON THE ADJOINING OWNER'S PROPERTY, THE COURT SHALL GRANTACCESS AS THECOURTDEEMS NECESSARYTOALLOWCOMPLETION OF THE REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE.
(a) REASONABLE NOTICE TOTHE ADJOININGOWNER IN ADVANCE OF THE ACCESS ;
THE COURT SHALL PRESCRIBE THE CONDITIONS AND DURATION OF THE REQUESTING OWNER'S ACCESS TO THE ADJOINING OWNER'S PROPERTY AND MAY REQUIRE:
(b) REASONABLE COMPENSATION TO THE ADJOINING OWNER ;
(a) REASONABLE NOTICE TO THE ADJOINING OWNER IN ADVANCE OF THE ACCESS;
(c) THAT THE REQUESTING OWNER PURCHASE INSURANCE OR POST BONDTOCOVERANYDAMAGETOPROPERTY ,PERSONALINJURY ,ORLOSSOF LIFE,THAT MAY OCCUR BECAUSE OF THE REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE ;OR (d) ANY OTHER CONDITION DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE COURT .
(b) REASONABLE COMPENSATION TO THE ADJOINING OWNER;
(6) THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY IF THE ADJOINING PROPERTY IS OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ,THE STATE ,OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STAT.
(c) THAT THE REQUESTING OWNER PURCHASE INSURANCE OR POST BONDTO COVERANY DAMAGETO PROPERTY, PERSONAL INJURY, ORLOSS OF LIFE, THAT MAY OCCUR BECAUSE OF THE REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE;
PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-177 SECTION 2.
OR (d) ANY OTHER CONDITION DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE COURT.
(6) THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY IF THE ADJOINING PROPERTY IS OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE STATE, OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE.
PA G E 3-SEN A TE BILL 26-177 SECTION 2.
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiod after final adjournment of the general assembly(August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment ofthe general assembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
except that, if a referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestate constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-177 approvedbythepeopleatthegeneralelectiontobeheldinNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuantto section 1(3) ofarticle V ofthe state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-177 approved bythe people at the general electionto be held inNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date ofthe official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
amesRashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES s er van Mourik \ ~ ~ V anesi11y SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED o nT blko~ V h~ 26 ~ 202.f:ocltz:ooF1"' (D e and ·me) Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 26-177
Polis GOVERNO OF OFCOLORADO PAGE 5-SENATE BILL 26-177
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the President of the Senate

  3. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass

  6. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  7. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee

  8. House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

  9. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  10. Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary

  11. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee

  12. Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  13. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 89 not signed on · 13 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (89)

89 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 89 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

REPASS

Passed 24 Yea · 11 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 21000
Republican 0901
Unaffiliated 3200
Total 241101
% of votes cast 67%31%0%3%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Nay
Pelton R. — Nay
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Nay
Cleave Simpson Republican Nay
Janice Rich Republican Nay
John Carson Republican Nay
Larry Liston Republican Not Voting
Lisa Frizell Republican Nay
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Nay
Marc Catlin Republican Nay
Mark Baisley Republican Nay
Scott Bright Republican Nay

Official roll call →

CONCUR

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 21000
Republican 9001
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 35001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Not Voting
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea
Marc Catlin Republican Yea
Mark Baisley Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 7000
Republican 1300
Total 8300
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Yea
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Yea
Lorena Garcia Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Nay
Matt Soper Republican Nay
Rebecca Keltie Republican Nay
Scott Slaugh Republican Yea

Official roll call →

BILL

Passed 24 Yea · 12 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 21000
Republican 01000
Unaffiliated 3200
Total 241200
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Benavidez — Yea
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Nay
Pelton R. — Nay
President — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Nay
Cleave Simpson Republican Nay
Janice Rich Republican Nay
John Carson Republican Nay
Larry Liston Republican Nay
Lisa Frizell Republican Nay
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Nay
Marc Catlin Republican Nay
Mark Baisley Republican Nay
Scott Bright Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 177 do?
The act creates a process for an owner of a single-family residence to petition a district court for limited access to an adjoining property to complete repairs or maintenance to the single-family residence if the owner of the adjoining property has denied such access. The owner of a single-family residence is encouraged to engage the adjoining property owner in alternative dispute resolution, such as mediation, prior to petitioning the court. In petitioning the court, the owner of a single-family residence must demonstrate that they have made reasonable efforts to obtain permission from the adjoining property owner to access the adjoining property. A petitioner must also specify the nature of the repairs or maintenance they seek to complete and describe why they cannot complete the repairs or maintenance without access to the adjoining property. If the court determines that access to the adjoining property is necessary to repair or maintain the petitioner's property and will not negatively affect an easement on the adjoining property, the court shall grant access to the adjoining property as necessary to allow completion of the repair or maintenance and shall prescribe the conditions and duration of the petitioner's access. The act does not apply to an adjoining property that is owned or controlled by the federal government, the state, or a political subdivision of the state.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors SB 177?
SB 177 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, A. Boesenecker, J. Mabrey, L. Gilchrist, Matt Ball (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), Julie Gonzales (Democrat), Nick Hinrichsen (Democrat), Cathy Kipp (Democrat), Marc Snyder (Democrat), and Katie Wallace (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 177?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 22, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 177?
Track SB 177 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 177

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 177

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →