HB 1222 — Modify Tax Expenditures
Last action — Senate Committee on Finance Postpone Indefinitely
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 17, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
25 sponsors
3 primary, 22 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (23 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Recent changes to the federal income tax code significantly increased the amount of business-related expenses that may be deducted for federal income tax purposes as follows:Expanded the business interest deduction limitation pursuant to section 163 (j) of the internal revenue code (IRC) by adding back depreciation, amortization, and depletion for calculation of adjusted taxable income and determination of the deduction base, resulting in many taxpayers, especially capital intensive businesses, being able to deduct a larger portion of their business interest expense; Expanded the bonus depreciation deduction pursuant to section 168 (k) of the IRC by permanently restoring the 100% first-year bonus depreciation deduction for 'qualified property' acquired and placed in service on or after January 20, 2025;Created an elective 100% depreciation deduction in section 168 (n) of the IRC for 'qualified production property', which is property largely tied to manufacturing, production, or refining facilities and that would not otherwise qualify for section 168 (k) bonus depreciation; andCreated a new section 174A of the IRC that allows taxpayers to immediately deduct domestic research and experimental expenditures paid or incurred during the taxable year, rather than requiring such costs to be capitalized and amortized over time. Because the state income tax is imposed on federal taxable income, these changes to the definition of federal income also exclude these business-related expenses from state income taxation. The bill reverses these changes to the federal tax code for purposes of the state income tax code and creates a new tax credit using the resulting revenue. Sections 2 and 4 of the bill provide, for income tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2027, that individual and corporate state income taxpayers must add the following to their federal taxable income for purposes of applying the state income tax: An amount equal to the federal deduction claimed by the taxpayer for business interest pursuant to the limitation in section 163 (j) of the IRC to the extent the amount exceeds the amount the taxpayer would have been allowed to claim before the limitation was changed as described above;An amount equal to the federal deduction claimed by the taxpayer for qualified property depreciation pursuant to section 168 (k) of the IRC to the extent the amount claimed exceeds the amount the taxpayer would have been allowed to claim under section 168 (k) prior to the change described above; except that, the taxpayer may reduce the amount required to be added back by the amount of depreciation the taxpayer would have been allowed to claim for the taxable year with respect to the same property pursuant to any section other than section 168 (k) of the IRC prior to the recent federal changes;An amount equal to the federal deduction claimed by the taxpayer for qualified production property depreciation pursuant to section 168 (n) of the IRC; except that, the taxpayer may reduce the amount required to be added back by the amount of depreciation the taxpayer would have been allowed to claim for the taxable year with respect to the same property pursuant to any section other than section 168 (k) of the IRC prior to the recent federal change; andAn amount equal to the federal deduction claimed by the taxpayer for the income tax year for domestic research and experimental expenditures pursuant to section 174A of the IRC; except that, the taxpayer may reduce the amount required to be added back by the amount of the deduction the taxpayer would have been allowed to claim for the taxable year with respect to the same research and experimental expenditures pursuant to section 174 of the IRC prior to the recent federal changes. Sections 2 and 4 allow taxpayers who are required to make additions to their federal taxable income pursuant to the new provisions to subtract the amounts of their disallowed federal deductions over time, starting in income tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2028, using time periods that reflect how the property or expense would have been treated prior to the recent changes to the federal tax code. If the amount of the allowed subtraction exceeds the taxpayer's federal taxable income, the excess amount not subtracted may be carried forward for up to 10 years. Section 3 creates a new tax credit. The new tax credit allows taxpayers to claim a refundable tax credit, in addition to the child tax credit and the family affordability tax credit, in an amount determined by the amount and age of the taxpayer's children and the taxpayer's income. The total amount of the new tax credit is adjusted annually based on legislative council staff projections, such that the total amount of the new tax credit claimed in an income tax year is projected to be the same as the amount of revenue raised in sections 2 and 4.(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
24 added · 16 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to HB 1222 reflect the adoption of amendments that streamline the bill's formatting and clarify its intent regarding tax expenditures. Notably, the title indicates a focus on modifications related to business-related expense deductions, which have been affected by updates in the federal tax code. This matters because it ensures that the bill aligns with current tax laws, helping businesses navigate their deductions more effectively. Simplifying the language and structure may also make it easier for lawmakers and the public to understand the bill's provisions.
Second Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the House of Introduction LLS NO.
26-0464.01 Pierce Lively x2059 HOUSE BILL 26-1222 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP GarciaGarciaandMcCormick, andBacon,Boesenecker,Brown,Clifford,Duran,Froelich,Hamrick, McCormick,Jackson,Lindsay,Lukens,Mabrey,McCluskie,Nguyen,Rutinel,Rydin,Sirota,Smith,Story, Titone, Velasco, Woodrow, Zokaie SENATE SPONSORSHIP Kipp, House Committees Senate Committees Finance Appropriations A BILL FOR AN ACT C ONCERNING THE MODIFICATION OF TAX EXPENDITURES ,AND , ANDIN ,IN CONNECTION THEREWITH , MAKING ADDITIONS TO THE DEFINITION OF FEDERAL TAXABLE INCOME FOR TAX YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2027, AND CREATING THE FAMILY AFFORDABILITY CREDIT .
d d Bill Summary e 6 E a 0 S U , (Note:
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does O i 4 notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill H a a R M passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that r applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at 3 http://leg.colorado.gov.) Recent changes to the federal income tax code significantly in d 6 increased the amount of business-related expenses that maybe deducted aE 2e S0 RU 2Rd , O n2 1y Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.2amendment. a Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to edisting law.
H d M Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.d Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Reengrossed Current pdf May 04, 2026
- Engrossed View text pdf May 02, 2026
- Introduced View text pdf February 17, 2026
Action History
-
Senate Committee on Finance Postpone Indefinitely
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Finance
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
-
House Committee on Finance Refer Amended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Finance
Sponsors
- Jamie Jackson · Cosponsor
- Mandy Lindsay · Cosponsor
- Meghan Lukens · Cosponsor
- Javier Mabrey · Cosponsor
- Julie McCluskie · Cosponsor
- Emily Sirota · Cosponsor
- Lesley Smith · Cosponsor
- Tammy Story · Cosponsor
- Brianna Titone · Cosponsor
- Elizabeth Velasco · Cosponsor
- Steven Woodrow · Cosponsor
- C. Kipp · Primary
- L. García · Primary
- Jennifer Bacon · Cosponsor
- Andrew Boesenecker · Cosponsor
- Kyle Brown · Cosponsor
- Chad Clifford · Cosponsor
- Monica Duran · Cosponsor
- Meg Froelich · Cosponsor
- Manny Rutinel · Cosponsor
- Karen McCormick · Primary
- Eliza Hamrick · Cosponsor
- Kenny Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Gretchen Rydin · Cosponsor
- Yara Zokaie · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 22 co-sponsors · 76 not signed on · 23 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- C. Kipp
- L. García
- Karen McCormick Democrat
Co-sponsors (22)
- Jamie Jackson Democrat
- Mandy Lindsay Democrat
- Meghan Lukens Democrat
- Javier Mabrey Democrat
- Julie McCluskie Democrat
- Emily Sirota Democrat
- Lesley Smith Democrat
- Tammy Story Democrat
- Brianna Titone Democrat
- Elizabeth Velasco Democrat
- Steven Woodrow Democrat
- Jennifer Bacon Democrat
- Andrew Boesenecker Democrat
- Kyle Brown Democrat
- Chad Clifford Democrat
- Monica Duran Democrat
- Meg Froelich Democrat
- Manny Rutinel Democrat
- Eliza Hamrick Democrat
- Kenny Nguyen Democrat
- Gretchen Rydin Democrat
- Yara Zokaie Democrat
Not signed on (76)
76 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 76 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 11% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Nay |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 40 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 42 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez R. | — | Nay |
| Stewart K. | — | Yea |
| Stewart R. | — | Yea |
| Winter T. | — | Nay |
| Garcia Sander | — | Nay |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Paschal | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Nay |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Gretchen Rydin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jacque Phillips | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kenny Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Lesley Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsay Gilchrist | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Feret | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Lori Goldstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Manny Rutinel | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew Martinez | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Meghan Lukens | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Nay |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Nay |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Carlos Barron | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Nay |
| Dusty Johnson | Republican | Nay |
| Jarvis Caldwell | Republican | Nay |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
How each member voted (1)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebekah Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Nay |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Not Voting |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Ryan Gonzalez | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
How each member voted (1)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1222 do?
- Recent changes to the federal income tax code significantly increased the amount of business-related expenses that may be deducted for federal income tax purposes as follows:Expanded the business interest deduction limitation pursuant to section 163 (j) of the internal revenue code (IRC) by adding back depreciation, amortization, and depletion for calculation of adjusted taxable income and determination of the deduction base, resulting in many taxpayers, especially capital intensive businesses, being able to deduct a larger portion of their business interest expense; Expanded the bonus depreciation deduction pursuant to section 168 (k) of the IRC by permanently restoring the 100% first-year bonus depreciation deduction for 'qualified property' acquired and placed in service on or after January 20, 2025;Created an elective 100% depreciation deduction in section 168 (n) of the IRC for 'qualified production property', which is property largely tied to manufacturing, production, or refining facilities and that would not otherwise qualify for section 168 (k) bonus depreciation; andCreated a new section 174A of the IRC that allows taxpayers to immediately deduct domestic research and experimental expenditures paid or incurred during the taxable year, rather than requiring such costs to be capitalized and amortized over time. Because the state income tax is imposed on federal taxable income, these changes to the definition of federal income also exclude these business-related expenses from state income taxation. The bill reverses these changes to the federal tax code for purposes of the state income tax code and creates a new tax credit using the resulting revenue. Sections 2 and 4 of the bill provide, for income tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2027, that individual and corporate state income taxpayers must add the following to their federal taxable income for purposes of applying the state income tax: An amount equal to the federal deduction claimed by the taxpayer for business interest pursuant to the limitation in section 163 (j) of the IRC to the extent the amount exceeds the amount the taxpayer would have been allowed to claim before the limitation was changed as described above;An amount equal to the federal deduction claimed by the taxpayer for qualified property depreciation pursuant to section 168 (k) of the IRC to the extent the amount claimed exceeds the amount the taxpayer would have been allowed to claim under section 168 (k) prior to the change described above; except that, the taxpayer may reduce the amount required to be added back by the amount of depreciation the taxpayer would have been allowed to claim for the taxable year with respect to the same property pursuant to any section other than section 168 (k) of the IRC prior to the recent federal changes;An amount equal to the federal deduction claimed by the taxpayer for qualified production property depreciation pursuant to section 168 (n) of the IRC; except that, the taxpayer may reduce the amount required to be added back by the amount of depreciation the taxpayer would have been allowed to claim for the taxable year with respect to the same property pursuant to any section other than section 168 (k) of the IRC prior to the recent federal change; andAn amount equal to the federal deduction claimed by the taxpayer for the income tax year for domestic research and experimental expenditures pursuant to section 174A of the IRC; except that, the taxpayer may reduce the amount required to be added back by the amount of the deduction the taxpayer would have been allowed to claim for the taxable year with respect to the same research and experimental expenditures pursuant to section 174 of the IRC prior to the recent federal changes. Sections 2 and 4 allow taxpayers who are required to make additions to their federal taxable income pursuant to the new provisions to subtract the amounts of their disallowed federal deductions over time, starting in income tax years commencing on or after January 1, 2028, using time periods that reflect how the property or expense would have been treated prior to the recent changes to the federal tax code. If the amount of the allowed subtraction exceeds the taxpayer's federal taxable income, the excess amount not subtracted may be carried forward for up to 10 years. Section 3 creates a new tax credit. The new tax credit allows taxpayers to claim a refundable tax credit, in addition to the child tax credit and the family affordability tax credit, in an amount determined by the amount and age of the taxpayer's children and the taxpayer's income. The total amount of the new tax credit is adjusted annually based on legislative council staff projections, such that the total amount of the new tax credit claimed in an income tax year is projected to be the same as the amount of revenue raised in sections 2 and 4.(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
- Who sponsors HB 1222?
- HB 1222 is sponsored by Jamie Jackson (Democrat), Mandy Lindsay (Democrat), Meghan Lukens (Democrat), Javier Mabrey (Democrat), Julie McCluskie (Democrat), Emily Sirota (Democrat), Lesley Smith (Democrat), Tammy Story (Democrat), Brianna Titone (Democrat), Elizabeth Velasco (Democrat), Steven Woodrow (Democrat), C. Kipp, L. García, Jennifer Bacon (Democrat), Andrew Boesenecker (Democrat), Kyle Brown (Democrat), Chad Clifford (Democrat), Monica Duran (Democrat), Meg Froelich (Democrat), Manny Rutinel (Democrat), Karen McCormick (Democrat), Eliza Hamrick (Democrat), Kenny Nguyen (Democrat), Gretchen Rydin (Democrat), and Yara Zokaie (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1222?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 17, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 1222?
- Track HB 1222 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1222
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1222
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →