SB 152 — Changes Automated Vehicle Identification System Usage
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 31, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on June 02, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
4 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (5 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 13 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill modifies the use and penalty structure of automated vehicle identification systems (AVIS).
This act updates how automated vehicle identification systems function, including public notice requirements and penalty responsibilities for vehicle owners. It also establishes new compensation structures for AVIS vendors and changes to speeding violation penalties.
What this means for you
- Workers: Workers may experience changes in enforcement practices regarding speeding violations in areas where AVIS are used.
- Consumers: Consumers who own vehicles will be held accountable for violations captured by AVIS, unless they provide proof of sale or theft.
Summary
The act makes changes to the use of automated vehicle identification systems (AVIS), including:Modifying the public notice requirements that the state, a county, a city and county, a municipality, or an agency responsible for placing a new AVIS must provide before utilizing the new AVIS;Making the registered owner of a motor vehicle responsible for all civil penalties associated with violations committed with the vehicle unless the vehicle was sold, leased, or stolen;Creating a procedure through which the registered owner of a motor vehicle may prove that the vehicle was sold, leased, or stolen at the time when a violation was detected by an AVIS and, thereby, under certain circumstances, relieving the registered owner from having to pay the civil penalty associated with the notice of violation;Requiring that, if a variable speed limit is in effect or a speed limit is otherwise temporarily lowered due to hazardous weather or other traffic conditions, the state, a county, a city and county, or a municipality may issue only a notice of violation and civil penalty for a speeding violation that exceeds the regular maximum posted speed limit for that location;Changing the penalty structure for different levels of speeding violations detected by an AVIS;Establishing that the compensation the state, a county, a city and county, or a municipality pays to a manufacturer or vendor of an AVIS must, in addition to other conditions, be a flat monthly fee or a flat hourly rate and not include any incentives, bonuses, or escalators related to the number of citations issued or the amount of revenue generated; andBeginning January 1, 2035, increasing the civil penalties associated with notices of violations issued for violations captured by an AVIS.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
439 added · 506 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of SB 152 includes a clarification about the usage of two types of systems: automated vehicle identification systems (AVIS) and automated license plate reader systems (ALPR). It emphasizes that AVIS is specifically for traffic violations, whereas ALPR is mainly used for law enforcement, like tracking stolen vehicles. This distinction is important because it helps ensure that the technology is used appropriately and gives the public a clearer understanding of how these systems function in relation to law enforcement practices.
SecondNOTE: Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
26-0899.01This Reneebill Leonehas x2695been SENATEprepared BILLfor 26-152the SENATEsignatures SPONSORSHIPof Ballthe andappropriate Peltonlegislative B.,officers Coleman, Cutter, Hinrichsen HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Willford and Barron,the DuranGovernor. d n e 2 E a 2 U U , O i 1 H a a Senate Committees House Committees R M Transportation & Energy Transportation, Housing & Local Government r g A BILL FOR AN ACT d 2 E a 2 C ONCERNING CHANGES TO THE USAGE OF AUTOMATED VEHICLE S R , O d 1 H 2 a IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS .
eTo Mdetermine nwhether ethe BillGovernor Summaryhas Asigned (Note:the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
ThisSENATE summaryBILL applies26-152 toBY thisSENATOR(S) billBall as introduced and doesPelton notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.IfthisbillB., gBridges, iCutter, passesHinrichsen, thirdColeman; reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that a 6 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at E R 0 A r , http://leg.colorado.gov.) N 3 5 S e a n M The bill makes changes to the use of automated vehicle e identification systems (AVIS), including:
Aalso !REPRESENTATIVE(S) ModifyingWillford the public notice requirements that the state, a county, a city and county,Barron, aDuran. municipality, or an agency n responsible for placing a new AVIS must provide before d utilizing the new AVIS;
eC 6ONCERNING ECHANGES RTO 0THE AUSAGE nOF ,AUTOMATED EVEHICLE 2IDENTIFICATION 4SYSTEMS Shading. denotes HOUSE amendment.
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
S e a Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n M Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
m A ! Creating a procedure by which a registered owner of a motor vehicle may prove that they were not the driver of themotorvehicleatthetimewhenaviolationwasdetected by an AVIS and, thereby, under certain circumstances, relieving the registered owner from having to paythe civil penalty associated with the notice of violation;
! Requiring that, if a variable speed limit is in effect or a speed limit is otherwise temporarily lowered due to hazardous weather or other traffic conditions, the state, a county, a cityand county, or a municipalitymayonlyissue a notice of violation and civil penalty for a speeding violation that exceeds the regular maximum posted speed limit for that location;
! Changing the penalty structure for different levels of speeding violations detected by an AVIS;
! Establishing that the compensation the state, a county, a cityandcounty,oramunicipalitypaystoamanufactureror vendorofanAVISmust,inadditiontootherconditions,be a flat monthly rate;
and ! Beginning January 1, 2035, increasing the civil penalties associated with notices of violations issued for violations captured by an AVIS.
SECTION1.SECTION 1.
Legislativedeclaration.(1)Legislative Thegeneralassemblydeclaration. finds and declares that:
(a)(1) AutomatedThe vehiclegeneral identificationassembly systems,finds referred to in section as "AVIS", are used for the limited purpose of enforcing specific traffic violations, including speeding and red-lightdeclares violations,that: and are subject to statutory requirements, governing notice, signage, and due process;
(b)(a) Conversely,Automated automatedvehicle licenseidentification plate reader systems, referred tointhissectionas"ALPRsystems",aredistincttechnologiesfromAVISto andin this section as "AVIS", are used primarily for lawthe enforcementlimited andpurpose investigativeof purposes,enforcing specific traffic violations, including speeding and red-light violations, and are subject to locatestatutory stolenrequirements, vehiclesgoverning ornotice, supportsignage, criminaland investigations;due process;
(c)(b) TheConversely, provisionsautomated oflicense thisplate actreader applyonlytosystems, AVISreferred to inthissectionas"ALPRsystems",aredistincttechnologiesfromAVISand are used primarily for law enforcement and civilinvestigative trafficpurposes, -2-including 152to enforcement;locate stolen vehicles or support criminal investigations;
(d)________ Thisactdoesnotregulate,limit,Capital letters or otherwisebold affect& theitalic usenumbers ofindicate ALPRnew systemsmaterial andadded nothing in this act is intended to expand, restrict, or modify existing lawlaw; governing ALPR systems;
anddashes (e)through Givenwords theor differencesnumbers betweenindicate AVISdeletions asfrom aexisting trafficlaw enforcement tool and ALPRsuch systemsmaterial as a broader surveillance technology, it is importanttomaintainasimpledistinctionbetweenthesystemsandmakenot clearpart thatof the provisionsact. in this act are limited accordingly.
SECTION(c) 2.The provisions of this act apply only to AVIS and civil traffic enforcement;
In(d) ColoradoThis Revisedact Statutes,does 42-4-110.5,not amendregulate, (2)limit, introductoryor portion,2)(d)(II)(B),otherwise (2)(e),affect (2)(g)(I.7),the (2)(g)(IV),use (2)(h),of (4),ALPR (4.5)(a),systems, (4.6)(b),d)(I), and (5);nothing in this act is intended to expand, restrict, or modify existing law governing ALPR systems;
and (e) Given the differences between AVIS as a traffic enforcement toolandALPRsystemsasabroadersurveillancetechnology,itisimportant tomaintainasimpledistinctionbetweenthesystemsandmakeclearthatthe provisions in this act are limited accordingly.
SECTION2.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,42-4-110.5,amend(2) introductoryportion,(2)(d)(II)(B),(2)(e),(2)(g)(I.7),(2)(g)(IV),(2)(h),(4), (4.5)(a), (4.6)(b), (4.6)(d)(I), and (5);
(a)(a)(III) (III)"ATOMATEDVEHICLEIDENTIFICATIONSYSTEM "UTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM " DOESDOESNOT NOT INCLUDE AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READER SYSTEMS .
(a.5)(I)(a.5) "OBILEAUTOMATEDVEHICLEIDENTIFICATIONSYSTEM(I) "MOBILE AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM " MEANS AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM DESIGNED TO DETECT TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS AND THAT:THAT :
(A) ISI S CAPABLE OF BEING RELOCATED BETWEEN ENFORCEMENT LOCATIONS ;
(B) M AYAYBE BEINSTALLEDWITHINORMOUNTEDTOAMOTORVEHICLE INSTALLED, WITHIN OR MOUNTED TO A MOTOR VEHICLE INCLUDINGAVAN ,SPORTUTILITYVEHICLE ,ORSIMILARVEHICLE,ORSIMILARVEHICLEPLATFORM -3- 152 PLATFORM ;
(C) D OES NOT INCLUDE A DEVICE OR SYSTEM INSTALLED IN OR MOUNTED TO A TRAILER;ANDTRAILER ;AND PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-152 (D) ISI S GENERALLY USED TO PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY TO ADDRESS TEMPORARY ENFORCEMENT IN HIGH RISK-RISK TRAFFIC AREAS OR SHIFTING TRAFFIC PATTERNS.PATTERNS .
(II) AADEVICE DEVICE OR SYSTEM INSTALLED IN OR MOUNTED TO A TRAILER IS CONSIDERED MOBILE IF IT IS MOVED TO A NEW LOCATION WITHINSEVENTYWITHIN -TWOHOURSAFTERBEINGDEPLOYEDORISDEPLOYEDINSEVENTY A-TWO MAINTENANCEHOURS ,AFTER REPAIR,BEING DEPLOYED OR CONSTRUCTIONIS ZONEDEPLOYED DESIGNATEDIN PURSUANTA TOMAINTENANCE ,REPAIR ,ORCONSTRUCTIONZONEDESIGNATEDPURSUANTTO SECTION 42-4-614OR42-4-614 OR A SCHOOL ZONE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 42-4-615.
(1.5) Nothing in this section applies to a violation detected byanby automatedvehicleidentificationsystemfordrivingtwenty-fivemilesperan hourormoreinexcessofthereasonableandprudentspeedortwenty-fiveautomated vehicle identification system for driving twenty-five miles per hour or more in excess of the reasonable and prudent speed or twenty-five miles per hour or more in excess of the maximum speed limit of seventy-five miles per hour detected by the use of an automated vehicle identification system.
(2) A county, city and county, or municipality may adopt an ordinanceordinanceauthorizingtheuseofanautomatedvehicleidentificationsystem authorizing the use of an automated vehicle identification system to detect violations of traffic regulations adopted by the county, cityandcity and county, or municipality, or the state, a county, a cityandcity and county, or a municipality may utilize an automated vehicle identification system to detectdetecttrafficviolationsunderstatelaw,subjecttothefollowingconditions traffic violations under state law, subject to the following conditions and limitations and, as applicable,uirementsapplicable, the requirements for state highways set forth in and anyanyrulesadoptedbythe rulesdepartment adoptedof bytransportation thepursuant departmentto subsection (2.5) of transportationpursuanttosubsection(2.5)ofthissection,ICABLEthis ,section,S -4-APPLICABLE 152, AND THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS:LIMITATIONS :
(d) (II) ExceptExceptasprovidedinsubsection(2)(d)(I)of asthissection,an providedautomatedvehicleidentification insystemdesigned subsection (2)(d)(I) of this section, an automated vehicle identification system designed to detectdetectdisobedienceto disobedience to a traffic control signal or another violation of this article 4 or a local traffic ordinance shall not be used unless the state, county, city and county, or municipality using such system conspicuously posts asignnotifyingthepublicthatanautomatedvehicleidentificationsystema issign innotifying usethe immediatelypublicthatanautomatedvehicleidentificationsystemisinuseimmediately ahead.
(B) Use lettering that is at least four inches high for upper case letters and two and nine-tenthsEnine-tenthsTHREE inches high for lower case letters.
(e) (I) If the state,nty,Acitystate, county, A city and county,Aomunicipalitycounty, orA municipality PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-152 implements a new automated vehicle identification system after July 1, 2023, that is not a replacement of aEXISTINGan EXISTING automated vehicle identification system:
(A) TheTheagencyresponsiblefortheautomatedvehicleidentification agency responsible for the automated vehicle identification system shall publicly announce the implementation of the system through its websitewebsiteAND SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS ,IF AN,ANY, for at least thirty days prior to the use of the system;
and (B) T HE AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATIONSYSTEMSHALLPOSTASIGNANNOUNCINGTHEUPCOMINGIDENTIFICATION SYSTEM SHALL POST A SIGN ANNOUNCING THE UPCOMING USE OF AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM AT EACH LOCATIONWHEREANAUTOMATEDVEHICLEIDENTIFICATIONSYSTEMWILLLOCATION WHERE AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST THIRTY DAYS BEFORE THE AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATIONSYSTEMISUTILIZED,ANDTHESIGNMUSTUSELETTERINGIDENTIFICATION THATISATLEASTFOURINCHESHIGHFORUPPERCASELETTERSANDTHREESYSTEM IS UTILIZED ,AND THE SIGN MUST USE LETTERING THAT IS AT LEAST FOUR INCHES HIGH FOR UPPERCASE LETTERS AND THREE INCHES HIGH FOR LOWERCASE LETTERS;ANDLETTERS ;AND (B) (C) For the first thirty days after the system is installed or -5- 152 deployed, only warnings may be issued for violations of a county or municipal traffic regulation or traffic violation under state law detected by the system.
UCHSCH WARNINGS MUST BE ISSUED AND DELIVERED IN WRITING .
(II) A THET HE state, county, city and county, or municipality may conduct an extended public information campaign or warning ORriodperiod OR POST ADDITIONAL SIGNS for systemsEACHsystems EACH NEW SYSTEM installed or deployed either before or after July 1, 2BEYOND2023 BEYOND THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTSREQUIREMENTSINSUBSECTIONS IN(2)(e)(I)(A),(2)(e)(I)(BAND SUBSECTIONS(2)(e)(I)(C) (2)(e)(I)(A),OF (2)(e)(I)(BAND (2)(e)(I)(COF THIS SECTIO.SECTION.
Show all 96 changed lines (56 more)
(III) HEREQUIREMENTSSETFORTHINTHISSUBSECTIONTE (2)(eDOREQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THIS SUBSECTION (2)(e)DO NOT APPLY TO A MOBILE AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM THATTHATHASBEENMOVEDTOANEWLOCATIONWITHINTHESAMEESTABLISHED HAS BEEN MOVED TO A NEW LOCATION WITHIN THE SAME ESTABLISHED AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION CORRIDOR .
(g) (I.7) Before the state, a county,ity and county, oAA municipalitycity beginsand operationcounty, ofor anA automatedmunicipalitybeginsoperationofanautomatedvehicleidentificationsystem vehicle identification system in an automated vehicle identification corridor, the state, county, city and county, or municipality must:
PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-152 (A) Post a permanent sign in a conspicuous place not fewer than three hundred feet before the beginning of the corridor;
and (B) Post a permanent sign not fewer than three hundred feet before each static camera within the corridor thereaftermporarythereafter a temporary sign not fewerfewerthanthreehundredfeetbeforeanymobilecamera;exceptthat,foran thanautomatedvehicleidentificationcorridoronwhich threeIFanautomatedvehicle hundredidentificationsystemisusedontransitvehiclesforthepurposeofdetecting feetWILL beforeBE anymobileUSED camera;EXCLUSIVELY TO DETECT unauthorized use of a transit-only lane,THE STATE ,COUNTY ,CITY AND COUNTY ,OR MUNICIPALITY MUST post permanent signs at one-half mile or more frequent intervalsWITHIN THE AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION CORRIDOR ;
exceptand that,(C) forIllustrate, anthrough automateddata vehiclecollected identificationwithin corridorthe onpast whichfive automatedvehicleidentificationsystemisusedontransitvehiclesfortheyears purposeofdetectingWILLBEUSEDEXCLUSIVELYTODETECTQUANTITATIVE unauthorizedDATA useCOLLECTION , incidents of crashes, speeding, OR reckless driving orcommunitycomplaints WITHINTHE PAST FIVE YEARS on a transit-onlystreet lane,STATEdesignated ,COUNTYas ,CITYan ANDautomated COUNTYvehicle ,ORidentification -6-corridor, 152unless MUNICIPALITYthe MUSTautomated postvehicle permanentidentification signssystem atwill one-halfbe mileused exclusively to detect unauthorized usage of one or more frequenttransit-only intervalsTHINlanes THEUSE AUTOMATEDOF VEHICLEA IDENTIFICATIONTRANSIT CORRIDOR-ONLY ;LANE .
andCOMMUNITY (C)COMPLAINTS Illustrate,MAY throughALSO dataBE collectedUSED withinTO theILLUSTRATE past five years QUANTITATIVE DATA COLLECTION , incidents of crashes, speedORg, reckless driving or community complaintsIN THE PASTNEED FIVEFOR YEARSAN onAUTOMATED aVEHICLE streetIDENTIFICATION designatedCORRIDOR asIF anCOLLECTED automatedWITH vehicleQUANTITATIVE identificationDATA corridor,. unless the automated vehicle identification system will be used exclusivelytodetectunauthorizedusageofoneormoretransit-onlylanes USE OF A TRANSI-ONLY LANE.
COMMUNITY COMPLAINTS MAY ALSO BE USED TO ILLUSTRATE THE NEED FOR AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION CORRIDOR IF COLLECTED WITH QUANTITATIVE DA.A (IV) The state, a county, a city and county, or a municipality implementing an automated vehicle identification corridor pursuant to subsection(2)(g)(I)ofthissectionshallALLYsubsection publishareportonits(2)(g)(I) of this section shallALLY publish a report on its website disclosing the number of citations andNTand AMOUNT OF revenue generated by the automated vehicle identification corridor.
(h) (I) The state, a county, a citycityand and county, or a municipalitymunicipalityshall shallnotrequirearegisteredownerofnot avehicletodisclosetheidentityofrequire a registered owner of a vehicle to disclose the identity of a driver of the vehicle who is detected through the use of an automated vehicle identification system.
However, the registered owner may be required to submit evidence that the ownerownerwas was not the driver at the time oftheallegedviolation.EREGISTEREDOWNEROFTHEMOTORVEHICLEof DETECTEDthe BYalleged THEviolation. AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING THE CIVIL PENALTY ASSOCIATED WITH THE NOTICE OF THE VIOLATION UNLES:
(A) T HE REGISTERED OWNER ESTABLISHESOF THAT THE MOTOR -7- 152 VEHICLE HAD BEEN SOLD OR LEASED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION DETECTED BY THE AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM BYIS PROVIDINGRESPONSIBLEFORPAYINGTHECIVILPENALTYASSOCIATEDWITHTHENOTICE A BILL OF SALE OR OTHER DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW THAT THE MOTOR VEHICLE WAS SOLD ,LEASED,OR TRANSFERRED BEFORE THE DATE AND TIME OF THE VIOLATI;N (B) T HE REGISTERED OWNER ESTABLISHES THAT THE MOTOR VEHICLE HAD BEEN STOLEN PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION DETECTEDUNLESS BY: THE AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM BY PROVIDING A COPY OF THE POLICE REPORT TO SHOW THAT THE OWNES LICENSE PLATE OR MOTOR VEHICLE WAS STOLEN BEFORE THE DATE AND TIME OF THE VIOLATIO;
(C)(A) T HE REGISTERED OWNER ESTABLISHES THAT LAWTHE ENFORCEMENTISSUEDASEPARATETRAFFICCITATIONTOTHEREGISTEREDMOTOR OWNERORDRIVEROFTHEMOTORVEHICLEFORTHEVIOLATIONDETECTEDPAGE BY5-SENATE THEBILL AUTOMATED26-152 VEHICLE IDENTIFICATIONHAD SYSTE;ORBEEN (D)SOLD AOR REPRESENTATIVELEASED PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE ESTATEVIOLATION ORDETECTED ABY FAMILYTHE MEMBERAUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM BY PROVIDING A BILL OF THEREGISTEREDOWNERESTABLISHESTHATTHEREGISTEREDOWNERWASSALE DECEASEDOR PRIOROTHER DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW THAT THE DATEMOTOR OFVEHICLE THEWAS VIOLATIONSOLD DETECTED,LEASED BY,OR TRANSFERRED BEFORE THE AUTOMATEDDATE VEHICLEAND IDENTIFICATIONTIME SYSTEM.OF THE VIOLATION;
(II)(B) (A)TT OHE ESTABLISH THAT THE REGISTERED OWNER ISESTABLISHES NOTTHAT RESPONSIBLETHE FORMOTOR PAYINGVEHICLEHADBEENSTOLENPRIORTOTHETIMEOFTHEVIOLATIONDETECTED ABYTHEAUTOMATEDVEHICLEIDENTIFICATIONSYSTEMBYPROVIDINGACOPY CIVIL PENALTY ASSOCIATED WITH A NOTICE OF VIOLATION,THE REGISTERED OWNER OR A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATEPOLICE ORREPORT ATO FAMILYSHOW MEMBERTHAT OF THE REGISTERED OWNER MUS,WITHIN'S THIRTYDAYSAFTERTHEDATEOFISSUANCEOFTHENOTICEOFVIOLATIONLICENSE ,PLATE PROVIDEOR TOMOTOR THEVEHICLE ENTITYWAS THATSTOLEN ISSUEDBEFORE THE NOTICEDATE OFAND VIOLATIONTIME AN AFFIDAVIT WITH INFORMATION SHOWING THAT ONE OF THE EXCEPTIONSVIOLATION -8-; 152 SET FORTH IN SUBSECTION (2)(h)(IOF THIS SECTION APPLIE.
(C) THEREGISTEREDOWNERESTABLISHESTHATLAWENFORCEMENT ISSUED A SEPARATE TRAFFIC CITATION TO THE AFFIDAVITREGISTERED MUSTOWNER INCLUDEOR DRIVER OF THE CIVILMOTOR PENALTYVEHICLE NUMBE.FOR THE VIOLATION DETECTED BY THE AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ;OR (D) A REPRESENTATIVEOFTHEESTATEORAFAMILYMEMBEROFTHE REGISTERED OWNER ESTABLISHES THAT THE REGISTERED OWNER WAS DECEASED PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE VIOLATION DETECTED BY THE AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM .
4(II) (B)(A) T HEO REGISTEREDESTABLISH OWNER OF A MOTOR VEHICLE THAT WAS LEASED AT THE TIMEREGISTERED OFOWNER THE VIOLATION IS NOT REQUIREDRESPONSIBLE TOFOR SUBMITPAYING ANA AFFIDAVITCIVIL IFPENALTY THEASSOCIATED MOTORWITH VEHICLEA WASNOTICE REGISTEREDOF INVIOLATION THE NAMEREGISTEREDOWNERORAREPRESENTATIVE OFOFTHE THEESTATE LESSEEOR ATA THEFAMILY TIMEMEMBER OF THE VIOLATI.NREGISTERED 9OWNER (III)FTHEREGISTEREDOWNERTOWHOMANOTICEOFVIOLATIONMUST HAS,WITHIN BEENTHIRTY ISSUEDDAYSAFTERTHE ISDATEOFISSUANCEOFTHENOTICEOFVIOLATION DECEASE,THE,PROVIDE AFFIDAVITTOTHE MUSTENTITY INCLUDETHAT BOTHISSUED ATHE CERTIFIEDNOTICE COPYOFVIOLATION OFAN THEAFFIDAVIT DEATHWITH CERTIFICATEINFORMATION SHOWING THAT THEONE DEATH OF THE REGISTEREDEXCEPTIONS OWNERSET OCCURREDFORTH BEFOREIN THESUBSECTION DATE(2)(h)(IOF OFTHIS THESECTION VIOLATIONAPPLIES AND. ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:
(A)HE AAFFIDAVIT BILLMUST OFINCLUDE SALE OR OTHER DOCUMENT SHOWING THAT THE MOTORCIVIL VEHICLEPENALTY WASNUMBER SOLD. OR TRANSFERRED AFTER THE DATE OF THE REGISTERED OWNER S DEATH AND BEFORE THE DATE OF THE VIOLATIO;
(B) DOCUMENTEDT PROOFHE REGISTERED OWNER OF A MOTOR VEHICLE THAT THEWAS REGISTEREDLEASED LICENSEAT PLATETHE BELONGINGTIME TOOF THE REGISTEREDVIOLATION OWNERIS WASNOT RETURNEDREQUIRED TO SUBMIT AN AFFIDAVIT IF THE DEPARTMENTMOTOR ORVEHICLE ANOTHERWAS OFFICEREGISTERED ORIN AUTHORIZEDTHE AGENTNAME OF THE DEPARTMENTLESSEE AFTERAT THE DATETIME OF THE REGISTEREDVIOLATION OWNERS(III) DEATHI ANDTHE BEFOREREGISTERED THEOWNER DATETO WHOM A NOTICE OF THEVIOLATION VIOLATIO;ORHAS (C)BEEN AISSUED COPYIS OFDECEASED , THE POLICEAFFIDAVIT REPORTMUST SHOWINGINCLUDE THATBOTH THEA REGISTEREDPAGE OWNER6-SENATE SBILL LICENSE26-152 PLATECERTIFIED ORCOPY MOTOROF VEHICLETHE WASDEATH STOLENCERTIFICATE AFTERSHOWING THAT THE DATEDEATH OF THE REGISTERED OWNERSOWNER DEATHOCCURRED AND BEFORE THE DATE OF THE VIOLATIO.VIOLATION AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING :
(IV)(A) UPONA RECEIPTBILL OF THESALE AFFIDAVITOR ANDOTHER SUFFICIENTDOCUMENT SUPPORTINGDOCUMENTATIONPURSUANTTOTHISSUBSECTIONSHOWING (2)(h)THETHAT -9-THE 152MOTOR STATE,VEHICLE AWAS COUNTYSOLD ,A CITY AND COUNTY , OR ATRANSFERRED MUNICIPALITYAFTER SHALLTHE DISMISSTHENOTICEOFVIOLATIONANDPROVIDEPROOFOFTHEDISMISSALDATE TOOF THE REGISTERED OWNER ORS OTHERDEATH PERSONAND THATBEFORE SUBMITTEDTHE DATE OF THE AFFIDAVIT.VIOLATION;
6(B) (V)D AOCUMENTED PERSONPROOF THAT SUBMITSTHE AREGISTERED FALSELICENSE AFFIDAVITPLATE COMMITSBELONGING TO THE REGISTERED OWNER WAS RETURNED TO THE DEPARTMENT OR ANOTHER OFFICE OR AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE DEPARTMENT AFTER THE DATE OF THE REGISTERED OWNER S DEATH AND BEFORE THE DATE OF THE VIOLATION;OR (C) A CLASSCOPYOFTHE 2MISDEMEANORTRAFFICOFFENSEANDPOLICE ,UPONCONVICTIONREPORT ,SHALLSHOWINGTHAT BETHE PUNISHEDREGISTERED ASOWNER PROVIDED'S INLICENSE SECTI42-4-1701PLATE (3).OR MOTOR VEHICLE WAS STOLEN AFTER THE DATE OF THE REGISTERED OWNER S DEATH AND BEFORE THE DATE OF THE VIOLATION .
(i)(IV) (I)UPONRECEIPT ECEPTOFTHE ASAFFIDAVIT PROVIDEDAND INSUFFICIENT SUBSECTIONSUPPORTING (2)(i)(IOFDOCUMENTATION THISPURSUANT SECTION,IFTO ATHIS VARIABLESUBSECTION SPEED(2)(h)THE LIMITSTATE IS, INA EFFECTCOUNTY OR, A SPEEDCITY LIMITAND ISCOUNTY OTHERWISE, TEMPORARILY LOWERED DUE TO HAZARDOUS WEATHER OR OTHERTRAFFICCONDITIONSA ,THESTATEMUNICIPALITY ,ACOUNTYSHALL ,ACITYANDCOUNTYDISMISS ,THE ORAMUNICIPALITYSHALLONLYISSUEANOTICEOFVIOLATIONANDCIVILNOTICE PENALTYOF FOR A VIOLATION DETECTEDAND BYPROVIDE ANPROOF AUTOMATEDOF VEHICLETHE IDENTIFICATIONSYSTEMIFTHEVIOLATIONISASPEEDINGVIOLATIONTHATDISMISSAL EXCEEDSTO THE REGULARREGISTERED MAXIMUMOWNER POSTEDOR SPEEDOTHER LIMITPERSON FOR THAT LOCATIONSUBMITTED THAT IS TYPICALLY IN EFFECT WHEN A VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT IS NOT IN EFFECT AND THE SPEEDAFFIDAVIT LIMIT IS NOT OTHERWISE TEMPORARILY LOWERED .
(II)(V) SBSECTION (2)(i)OFTHISSECTIONDOESNOTAPPLYWHEN A SPEEDPERSON LIMITTHAT ISSUBMITS TEMPORARILYA LOWEREDFALSE DUEAFFIDAVIT TOCOMMITS THEA NEEDCLASS FORMISDEMEANOR ATRAFFIC TEMPORARYOFFENSE MAINTENANCEAND ,REPAIR,,UPON ORCONVICTION CONSTRUCTION,SHALL ZONEBE DESIGNATEDPUNISHED PURSUANTAS TOPROVIDED SECTIONIN 42-4-614.SECTION42-4-1701 (3).
(4)(i) (a) (I) If,ROUGHEXCEPT THEAS USEPROVIDED OFIN ANSUBSECTION AUTOMATED(2)(i)(IIOF VEHICLETHIS IDENTIFICATIONSECTION, SYSTEM,IF theA state,VARIABLE aSPEED county,LIMIT aIS cityIN andEFFECT county,OR orA aSPEED municipalityLIMIT detectsIS aOTHERWISE speedingTEMPORARILY violationLOWERED ofDUE lessTO thanHAZARDOUS tenperWEATHER hourOR overOTHERTRAFFICCONDITIONS the,THESTATE reasonable,ACOUNTY and,ACITYANDCOUNTY prudentOR speedA underMUNICIPALITY aSHALL countyorONLY municipalISSUE -10-A 152NOTICE trafficOF regulationVIOLATION orAND underCIVIL statePENALTY law,FOR throughA theVIOLATION useDETECTED ofBY anAN automatedAUTOMATED vehicleidentificationsystemandtheviolationisthefirstviolationVEHICLE bytheIDENTIFICATION registeredSYSTEM ownerIF thatTHE theVIOLATION state,IS county,A citySPEEDING andVIOLATION county,THAT orEXCEEDSTHEREGULARMAXIMUMPOSTEDSPEEDLIMITFORTHATLOCATION municipalityTHAT hasIS detectedTYPICALLY usingIN anEFFECT automatedWHEN vehicleA identificationVARIABLE system,heSPEED state,LIMIT county,IS cityNOT andIN county,EFFECT orAND municipalityTHE maySPEED mailLIMIT theIS registeredNOT ownerOTHERWISE aTEMPORARILY warningLOWERED regarding. the violation.
butstate,PAGE county,7-SENATE cityBILL and26-152 county,(II) orUBSECTION municipality(2)(i)(IOFTHISSECTIONDOESNOT shallAPPLYWHENA notSPEEDLIMITISTEMPORARILYLOWEREDDUETOTHENEEDFORATEMPORARY impose anynalty or surcharge for such firsA violatioUNLESS THE VIOLATION OCCURS WITHIN A SCHOOL ZONE ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 42-4-615,OR WITHIN A MAINTENANCE ,,REPAIR REPAIR,ORCONSTRUCTIONZONEDESIGNATEDPURSUANTTO ,OR CONSTRUCTION ZONE DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO SECTION 42-4-614,42-4-614. IN WHICH CASE THE MAXIMUM PENALTY THAT THE STATE , COUNTY ,CITY AND COUNTY ,OR MUNICIPALITY MAY IMPOSE FOR SUCH VIOLATION ,INCLUDING ANY SURCHARGE ,IS FORTY DOLLARS.
(II)(4) IF,(a) THROUGH(I) If,THROUGH THE USE OF AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM,THESYSTEM STATE, Athe COUNTYstate, ,ACITYANDCOUNTYa ORcounty, Aa MUNICIPALITYcity DETECTSand Acounty, SPEEDINGor VIOLATIONa OFmunicipalitydetectsaspeedingviolationoflessthanten AT LEAST SIX ANDmilesperhour LESSover THANthe TENreasonable MILESand PERprudent HOURspeed OVERunder THEa REASONABLEcounty ANDor PRUDENTmunicipal SPEEDtraffic UNDERregulation Aor COUNTYunder ORstate MUNICIPALlaw, TRAFFICthrough REGULATIONthe ORuse UNDERof STATEan LAWautomated ,ANDvehicle THEidentificationsystemandtheviolationisthefirstviolationbytheregistered VIOLATIONowner ISthat THEthe FIRSTstate, VIOLATIONcounty, BYcity THEand REGISTEREDcounty, OWNERor THATmunicipality THEhas STATEdetected ,usinganautomatedvehicleidentificationsystem,thenthestate,county,city COUNTYand ,CITYcounty, ANDor COUNTYmunicipality ,ORmay MUNICIPALITYmail HASthe DETECTEDregistered USINGowner ANa AUTOMATEDwarning VEHICLEregarding IDENTIFICATIONthe SYSTEMviolation. ,THEN THE STATE,COUNTY ,CITY AND COUNTY , OR MUNICIPALITY SHALL MAIL THE REGISTERED OWNER A WARNING REGARDING THE VIOLATION .T HE STATE,COUNTY ,CITY AND COUNTY OR MUNICIPALITY SHALL NOT IMPOSE A PENALTY OR SURCHARGE FOR SUCH FIRST VIOLATION.
(III)but (A)The NOTWITHSTANDINGstate, SUBSECTIONcounty, (4)(a)(IIOFcity THISand -11-county, 152or SECTIONmunicipality ,IF,BEFOREshall JANUARYnot 1,impose 2035,anyA THROUGHpenalty THEor USEsurcharge OFfor ANsuch AUTOMATEDfirAt VEHICLEviolationUNLESS IDENTIFICATIONTHE SYSTEM ,THE STATE,A COUNTY ,A CITY AND COUNTY ,OR A MUNICIPALITY DETECTS A SPEEDING VIOLATION OFOCCURS ATWITHIN LEAST SIX AND LESS THAN TEN MILES PER HOUR OVER THE REASONABLE AND PRUDENT SPEED IN A SCHOOL ZONE , AS DEFINED IN SECTION 42-4-615,OR42-4-615, OR WITHIN A MAINTENANCE , REPAIR, OR CONSTRUCTIONZONEDESIGNATEDPURSUANTTOSECTIONCONSTRUCTION 42-4-614ANDZONE THEDESIGNATED VIOLATIONPURSUANT ISTO THESECTION FIRST42-4-614, VIOLATIONIN BYWHICH CASE THE REGISTERED OWN,THE MAXIMUM PENALTY THAT THE STATE ,COUNTY ,CITY AND COUNTY ,OR MUNICIPALITY MAY IMPOSE FOR SUCH VIOLATION ,,INCLUDING INCLUDING ANY SURCHARGE ,IS FORTY DOLLARS.DOLLARS .
(B)(II) THISSUBSECTIONIF, (4)(a)(IIISREPEALED,EFFECTIVEJANUARYTHROUGH 1,2036.THE USE OF AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ,THE STATE ,A COUNTY ,A CITY AND COUNTY ,OR A MUNICIPALITY DETECTS A SPEEDING VIOLATION OF AT LEAST SIX AND LESS THAN TEN MILES PER HOUR OVER THE REASONABLE AND PRUDENT SPEED UNDER A COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL TRAFFIC REGULATION OR UNDER STATE LAW , AND THE VIOLATION IS THE FIRST VIOLATION BY THE REGISTERED OWNERTHATTHESTATE ,COUNTY ,CITYANDCOUNTY ,ORMUNICIPALITYHAS DETECTED USING AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ,THEN THESTATE ,COUNTY ,CITYANDCOUNTY ,ORMUNICIPALITYSHALLMAILTHE REGISTERED OWNER A WARNING REGARDING THE VIOLATION .
(IV)THE NSTATE OTWITHSTANDINGSUBSECTION (4)(a)(IIOFTHISSECTION , BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2035,I,THROUGH THE USE OF AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ,THE STATE, A COUNTY ,A,CITY CITY AND COUNTY ,OR, AOR MUNICIPALITY DETECTSSHALL ANOT SPEEDINGIMPOSE VIOLATION OF AT LEAST SIX AND LESS THAN TEN MILES PER HOUR OVER THE REASONABLE ANDPRUDENTSPEEDINASCHOOLZONEASDEFINEDINSECTION 42-4-615, OR WITHIN A MAINTENANCEPENALTY ,REPAIR, OR CONSTRUCTIONSURCHARGE ZONE DESIGNATEDPURSUANTTOSECTION 42-4-614,ANDTHEVIOLATIONISTHE FIRST VIOLATION BY THE REGISTERED OWNER ,THE MAXIMUM PENALTY THAT THE STATE ,COUNTY ,CITY AND COUNTY ,OR MUNICIPALITY MAY IMPOSE FOR SUCH VIOLATIONFIRST ,INCLUDINGVIOLATION ANY SURCHARGE ,IS FIFTY DOLLARS .
(b)(III)(A) (I)NTWITHSTANDINGSUBSECTION (A)(4)(a)(IIOFTHISSECTION If,ORE, IF,BEFORE JANUARY 1,2035,THROUGH1,2035, THETHROUGHTHEUSEOFANAUTOMATEDVEHICLE USE OFAN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ,,THE theSTATE state,,A aCOUNTY county,,A aCITY cityAND -12-COUNTY 152,OR andA county,MUNICIPALITY orDETECTS a municipality detects a second or subsequent speeding violationBY A REGISTEREDSPEEDING OWNERVIOLATION OF AT LEAST SIX AND LESS PAGE 8-SENATE BILL 26-152 THAN TEN MILES PER HOUR OVER THE REASONABLE AND PRUDENT SPEED underIN aA countyormunicipaltrafficregulationorunderstatelaw,bytheregisteredSCHOOL owner,ZONE orAS aDEFINED firstIN suSPEEDINGSECTION violation42-4-615, byOR theWITHIN registeredA ownerMAINTENANCE if,REPAIR,ORCONSTRUCTIONZONEDESIGNATEDPURSUANTTO theSECTION provisions42-4-614, of subsection (4)(a) of this section do not apply, through the use of an automated vehicle identification system LEAST TEN AND LESSTHE THANVIOLATION TWENTYIS -FIVETHE MILESFIRST PERVIOLATION HOURBY OVER THE REASONABLEREGISTERED ANDOWNER PRUDENTSPEED,THE ,then,exceptasmaybepermittedinsubsection(4)(b)(II)MAXIMUM ofPENALTY thisTHAT section,THE theSTATE maximum,COUNTY penalty, thatCITY theAND state,COUNTY county,,OR cityMUNICIPALITY andMAY county,IMPOSE orFOR municipalitySUCH mayVIOLATION impose, forINCLUDING suchANY violation,SURCHARGE including,IS anyFORTY surcharge,DOLLARS is. forty dollars.
(B) T HISSUBSECTIONHIS (4)(b)(IISREPEALED,EFFECTIVESUBSECTION ANUARY(4)(a)(IIIIS REPEALED,EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2036.
(I.5)(IV) N OTWITHSTANDING SUBSECTION (4)(a)(IIOF THIS SECTION, BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2035IF,THROUGH2035, I, THROUGH THE USE OF AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ,THE STATE,ASTATE , A COUNTY ,A, A CITY AND COUNTY ,,OR OR A MUNICIPALITY DETECTS A SECONDSPEEDING ORVIOLATION SUBSEQUENTSPEEDINGVIOLATIONBYAREGISTEREDOWNEROFATLEASTOFAT LEAST SIX AND LESS THAN TEN MILES PER HOUR OVER THE REASONABLE AND PRUDENTSPEEDUNDERACOUNTYORMUNICIPALTRAFFICREGULATIONORPRUDENT UNDERSTATELAWSPEED ,ORASPEEDINGVIOLATIONBYTHEREGISTEREDOWNERIN OFATLEASTTENANDLESSTHANTWENTYA FIVEMILESPERHOUROVERTHESCHOOL REASONABLEZONE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 42-4-615,OR WITHIN A MAINTENANCE ,REPAIR ,OR CONSTRUCTION ZONE DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO SECTION 42-4-614, AND PRUDENTTHE SPEEDVIOLATION ,THENIS ,EXCEPTTHE ASFIRST MAYVIOLATIONBYTHE BEREGISTEREDOWNER PERMITTED,THE INSUBSECTIONMAXIMUM (4)(b)(IOFTHISSECTIONPENALTY ,THEMAXIMUMPENALTYTHATTHAT THE STATE ,COUNTY ,CITY AND COUNTY ,OR, OR MUNICIPALITY MAY IMPOSE FOR SUCH VIOLATION ,INCLUDING ANY SURCHARGE ,IS FIFTY DOLLARS.
(II)(b) If(I) anyA(A) violationIf,EFORE describedANUARY in1, subsection2035,THROUGH (4)(bORI)THE -13-USE 152OF (4)(b)(I.5)AN ofAUTOMATEDVEHICLEIDENTIFICATIONSYSTEM this,thestate,acounty,acityand sectioncounty,oramunicipalitydetectsasecondorsubsequentspeedingviolation occursBY withinA REGISTERED OWNER OF AT LEAST SIX AND LESS THAN TEN MILES PER HOUR OVER THE REASONABLE AND PRUDENT SPEED under a schoolcounty zoneor asmunicipal definedtraffic inregulation sectionor 42-4-615,under ORstate WITHINlaw, Aby MAINTENANCEthe ,registered REPAIR,owner, ORa CONSTRUCTIONfirst ZONEsuchPEEDING DESIGNATEDviolation PURSUANTbythe TOregistered SECTIONowner 42-4-614,if the provisions of subsection (4)(a) of this section do not apply, through the use of an automated vehicle identification systOF AT LEAST TEN AND LESS THAN TWENTY FIVEMILESPERHOUROVERTHEREASONABLEANDPRUDENTSPEED , then,exceptasmaybepermittedinsubsection(4)(b)(II)of thissection,the maximum penalty that the state, county, city and county, or municipality may beimpose imposedfor shallsuch beSdoubled.violation, including any surcharge, is forty dollars.
(B) T HISSUBSECTION (4)(b)(IISREPEALED ,EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2036.
PAGE 9-SENATE BILL 26-152 (I.5) BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2035,IF,THROUGH THE USE OF AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ,THE STATE ,A COUNTY ,A CITYANDCOUNTY ,ORAMUNICIPALITYDETECTSASECONDORSUBSEQUENT SPEEDING VIOLATION BY A REGISTERED OWNER OF AT LEAST SIX AND LESS THAN TEN MILES PER HOUR OVER THE REASONABLE AND PRUDENT SPEED UNDER A COUNTY OR MUNICIPAL TRAFFIC REGULATION OR UNDER STATE LAW ,OR A SPEEDING VIOLATION BY THE REGISTERED OWNER OF AT LEAST TENANDLESSTHANTWENTY FIVE MILESPER HOUR OVERTHE REASONABLE AND PRUDENT SPEED ,THEN,EXCEPT AS MAY BE PERMITTED IN SUBSECTION (4)(b)(IIOF THIS SECTION ,THE MAXIMUM PENALTY THAT THE STATE , COUNTY ,CITY AND COUNTY , OR MUNICIPALITY MAY IMPOSE FOR SUCH VIOLATION ,INCLUDING ANY SURCHARGE ,IS FIFTY DOLLAR.
(II) IfanyAviolationdescribedinsubsection(4)(b)(IOR(4)(b)(I.5) of this section occurs within a school zone as defined in section 42-4-615, ORWITHIN A MAINTENANCE ,REPAIR,OR CONSTRUCTIONZONE DESIGNATED PURSUANTTOSECTION 42-4-614,themaximumpenaltythatmaybeimposed shall beISdoubled.
(c) (I) (AF,BEFORE(A)F, BEFORE JANUARY 1,2035,THROUGH1, 2035,THROUGH THE USE OFANOF AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ,THE STATE,ASTATE COUNTY ,A CITY AND COUNTY ,OR,A ACITYANDCOUNTY MUNICIPALITY,ORAMUNICIPALITYDETECTSASPEEDINGVIOLATIONBY DETECTSAREGISTEREDOWNEROFTWENTY A-FIVEMILESPERHOURORMOREOVERTHE SPEEDINGREASONABLEANDPRUDENTSPEEDUNDERACOUNTYORMUNICIPALTRAFFIC VIOLATIONREGULATION BY A REGISTERED OWNER OF TWENTY FIVE MILES PER HOUR OR MORE OVER THE REASONABLE AND PRUDENT SPEED UNDER ASTATE COUNTYLAW OR,THE MUNICIPALMAXIMUM TRAFFICPENALTY REGULATIONTHAT ORTHE UNDER STATE LAW,COUNTY , THECITY MAXIMUMAND PENALTYTHATTHESTATECOUNTY ,COUNTY,OR ,CITYANDCOUNTYMUNICIPALITY ,ORMUNICIPALITY MAY IMPOSE FOR SUCH VIOLATION ,INCLUDING ANY SURCHARGE ,IS ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DOLLARS .
(B)T(B) HISTHISSUBSECTION SUBSECTION(4)(c)(IIS(4)(c)(IISREPEALED REPEALED,EFFECTIVEJANUARY,EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2036.
(II)BEGINNING(II) BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2035,IF,THROUGH THE USE OF AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ,THE STATE,ASTATE COUNTY ,A CITY AND COUNTY ,OR,A ACITYANDCOUNTY MUNICIPALITY,ORAMUNICIPALITYDETECTSASPEEDINGVIOLATIONBY DETECTSAREGISTEREDOWNEROFTWENTY A-FIVEMILESPERHOURORMOREOVERTHE SPEEDINGPAGE VIOLATION10-SENATE BYBILL A26-152 REGISTEREDREASONABLEANDPRUDENTSPEEDUNDERACOUNTYORMUNICIPALTRAFFIC OWNERREGULATION OF TWENTY FIVE MILES PER HOUR OR MORE OVER THE REASONABLE AND PRUDENT SPEED UNDER ASTATE COUNTYLAW OR,THE MUNICIPALMAXIMUM TRAFFICPENALTY REGULATIONTHAT ORTHE UNDER STATE LAW, ,THECOUNTY MAXIMUM,CITY PENALTYTHATTHESTATEAND ,COUNTYCOUNTY ,CITYANDCOUNTY,OR ,ORMUNICIPALITYMUNICIPALITY MAY IMPOSE FOR SUCH VIOLATION ,INCLUDING ANY SURCHARGE ,IS, IS ONE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS .
-14- 152 (4.5) (a) (I) (A)BEFORE(A) If,FORE JANUARY 1,2035, the state, a county, a city and county, or a municipality detects a violation of a county, city andcounty,ormunicipaltrafficregulationortrafficviolationunderstateand county, or municipal traffic regulation or traffic violation under state law for disobedience to a traffic control signal through the use of an automated vehicle identification system, the maximum civil penaltythatpenalty that the state, aunty, a citycounty, anda cityand county, or a municipalitymunicipalitymayimpose may impose for such violation, including any surcharge, is seventy-five dollars.
(B) THIST HIS SUBSECTION (4.5)(a)(IIS REPEALED ,,EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVEJANUARY JNUARY 1, 2036.
(II) BGINNINGBEGINNING JANUARY 1,2035,IFTHESTATE1,2035, ,ACOUNTYIF ,ACITYTHE ANDSTATE ,A COUNTY ,OR,A ACITY MUNICIPALITYANDCOUNTY DETECTS,ORAMUNICIPALITYDETECTSAVIOLATIONOFACOUNTY A,CITY VIOLATION OF A COUNTY , CITY AND COUNTY ,OR MUNICIPAL TRAFFIC REGULATION OR TRAFFIC VIOLATIONUNDERSTATELAWFORDISOBEDIENCETOATRAFFICCONTROLVIOLATION UNDER STATE LAW FOR DISOBEDIENCE TO A TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL THROUGH THE USE OF AN AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ,THE, MAXIMUMTHEMAXIMUMCIVILPENALTYTHATTHESTATE CIVIL PENALTY THAT THE STATE ,COUNTY ,CITY,CITYANDCOUNTY AND, COUNTYOR ,OR MUNICIPALITY MAY IMPOSE FOR SUCH VIOLATION ,,INCLUDING INCLUDING ANY SURCHARGE ,IS NINET-FIVENINETY-FIVE DOLLARS .
(4.6) (b) (I) (A) If,REIf,FORE JANUARY 1,1,2035, 2035, through the use of an automatedvehicleautomated vehicle identification system, the state, a county, a cityandcity and county, or a municipality detects a motor vehicle overtaking a stopped school bus with actuated visual signal lights in violation of section 42-4-1903 (1)(a), the maximum civil penalty the state, county, city and county, or municipality may impose for the violation is three hundred dollars, including surcharges or fees.
(B) THIST SUBSECTIONHISSUBSECTION (4.6)(b)(I)IS(4.6)(b)(IIS REPEALED ,,EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVEJANUARY JNUARY 1, 2036.
(II) BEGINNINGB EGINNING JANUARY 1, 2035,I,2035, IF, THROUGH THE USE OF AN -15- 152 AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ,THE STATE,ASTATE ,A COUNTY ,A CITY AND COUNTY ,OR, OR A MUNICIPALITY DETECTS A MOTOR VEHICLE PAGE 11-SENATE BILL 26-152 OVERTAKING A STOPPED SCHOOL BUS WITH ACTUATED VISUAL SIGNAL LIGHTS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION42-4-1903SECTION (1)(a)THE42-4-1903 (1)(a),THE MAXIMUM CIVIL PENALTYTHESTATEPENALTY THE STATE ,COUNTY ,CITYANDCOUNTY,CITY ,ORMUNICIPALITYMAYAND COUNTY ,OR MUNICIPALITY MAY IMPOSE FOR THE VIOLATION IS THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY -FIVE DOLLARS,DOLLARS , INCLUDING SURCHARGES OR FEES .
(d)(I)(d) OTWITHSTANDINGANYOTHERPROVISIONINTHISSECTION(I) ,NTWITHSTANDING theANY state,OTHER aPROVISION county,IN aTHIS citySECTION and, county,thestate,acounty,acityandcounty,aschooldistrict,oramunicipalitythat a school district, or a municipality that has installed an automated vehicle identification system on a school bus to detect a motor vehicle overtaking a stopped school bus shall not use any portion of a fine collected through the use of such system as the basisforpaymenttothemanufacturerorvendoroftheautomatedvehiclebasis for payment to the manufacturer or vendor of the automated vehicle identification system equipment.
The compensation paid by the state, county,county,cityandcounty,schooldistrict,ormunicipalityforsuchequipment city and county, school district, or municipality for such equipment must be based upon the value of any equipment or services provided and mustmustnotbebasedexclusivelyuponthenumberoftrafficcitationsissuedor not be based exclusively upon the number of traffic citations issued or the revenue generated by the automated vehicle identification system equipment.
(5) If the state, a county, a city and county, or a municipality has establishedestablishedanautomatedvehicleidentificationsystemfortheenforcement an automated vehicle identification system for the enforcement of county or municipal traffic regulations or state traffic laws,thennoportionofanyfinecollectedthroughtheuseofsuchsystemlaws, maythen beno portion of anyfine collected through the use of such system maybe paid to the manufacturer or vendor of the automated vehicle identification system equipment.
The compensation paid bybythe the state, county, cityand county, or municipalityformunicipality for such equipment shall:
(a) Be based upon the value of suchsuchequipmentandthevalueof equipmentany andservicesprovidedtothe thestate, valuecounty, ofcityand -16-county, 152or anymunicipality;and servicesmay provided(b) to(I) Not be based upon the state,number county,of citytraffic andcitations county,issued or municipality;theAMOUNT OF revenue generated by such equipment or services;OR (II) BE STRUCTURED AS A FLAT MONTHLY FEE OR A FLAT HOURLY RATE THAT IS NOT CONTINGENT UPON ,AND DOES NOT VARY BASED ON ,THE NUMBER OF TRAFFIC CITATIONS ISSUED OR THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE GENERATED ;AND (c) N OT INCLUDE ANY INCENTIVES ,BONUSES , ESCALATORS ,OR PAGE 12-SENATE BILL 26-152 OTHERPROVISIONSTHATAREDIRECTLYTIEDTOTHENUMBEROFCITATIONS ISSUED OR THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE GENERATED .
and may (b) (I)ot be based upon the number of traffic citations issued or theAMOUNT OF revenue generated by such equipment or serORces;
(II) B STRUCTURED AS A FLAT MONTHLY FEE OR A FLAT HOURLY RATE THAT IS NOT CONTINGENT UPON,AND DOES NOT VARY BASED ON , THE NUMBEROFTRAFFICCITATIONSISSUEDORTHEAMOUNTOFREVENUE GENERATED ;AND (c) NOT INCLUDE ANY INCENTIVES,BONUSES ,ESCALATORS ,OR OTHER PROVISIONS THAT ARE DIRECTLY TIED TO THE NUMBER OF CITATIONS ISSUED OR THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE GENERATED.
Act subject to petition - effective date - applicability.(1)applicability. Thisacttakeseffectat12:01a.m.onthedayfollowing the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the generalassembly(August12,2026,ifadjournmentsinedieisonMay13, 2026);
except(1) that,This if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3)ofarticleVofthestateconstitutionagainstthisactoranitem,section, or part of this act withintakes such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved bythe people at the12:01 generala.m. election to be held in November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
(2)on Thisactappliesthe today conductfollowing occurringorcontractsenteredintothe orexpiration renewedof the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);exceptthat,if areferendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or afteran item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the applicableact, effectiveitem, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be heldinNovember2026and,insuchcase, will take effect on the date of thisthe act.official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
-17-PAGE 15213-SENATE BILL 26-152 (2) Thisactappliestoconductoccurringorcontractsenteredintoor renewed on or after the applicable effective date of this act.
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 14-SENATE BILL 26-152
Show all 96 changed rows (56 more)
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Transportation, Housing & Local Government
-
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
Senate Committee on Transportation & Energy Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Transportation & Energy
Sponsors
- M. Duran · Cosponsor
- J. Willford · Primary
- C. Barron · Primary
- Matt Ball · Primary
- Byron Pelton · Primary
- Jeff Bridges · Cosponsor
- James Coleman · Cosponsor
- Lisa Cutter · Cosponsor
- Nick Hinrichsen · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- J. Willford
- C. Barron
- Matt Ball Democrat
- Byron Pelton Republican
Co-sponsors (5)
- M. Duran
- Jeff Bridges Democrat
- James Coleman Democrat
- Lisa Cutter Democrat
- Nick Hinrichsen Democrat
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 8% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 15% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Garcia Sander | — | Yea |
| Amy Paschal | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Jacque Phillips | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Kenny Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebekah Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Nay |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 8% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 152 do?
- The act makes changes to the use of automated vehicle identification systems (AVIS), including:Modifying the public notice requirements that the state, a county, a city and county, a municipality, or an agency responsible for placing a new AVIS must provide before utilizing the new AVIS;Making the registered owner of a motor vehicle responsible for all civil penalties associated with violations committed with the vehicle unless the vehicle was sold, leased, or stolen;Creating a procedure through which the registered owner of a motor vehicle may prove that the vehicle was sold, leased, or stolen at the time when a violation was detected by an AVIS and, thereby, under certain circumstances, relieving the registered owner from having to pay the civil penalty associated with the notice of violation;Requiring that, if a variable speed limit is in effect or a speed limit is otherwise temporarily lowered due to hazardous weather or other traffic conditions, the state, a county, a city and county, or a municipality may issue only a notice of violation and civil penalty for a speeding violation that exceeds the regular maximum posted speed limit for that location;Changing the penalty structure for different levels of speeding violations detected by an AVIS;Establishing that the compensation the state, a county, a city and county, or a municipality pays to a manufacturer or vendor of an AVIS must, in addition to other conditions, be a flat monthly fee or a flat hourly rate and not include any incentives, bonuses, or escalators related to the number of citations issued or the amount of revenue generated; andBeginning January 1, 2035, increasing the civil penalties associated with notices of violations issued for violations captured by an AVIS.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 152?
- SB 152 is sponsored by M. Duran, J. Willford, C. Barron, Matt Ball (Democrat), Byron Pelton (Republican), Jeff Bridges (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), and Nick Hinrichsen (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 152?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 31, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 152?
- Track SB 152 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 152
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 152
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →