Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 11 D · 5 R cosponsors

SB 137 — Measures to Reduce Administrative Burdens

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 11, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 14, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 26 sponsors

    4 primary, 22 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (11 D · 5 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Mixed recorded votes

    6 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Current law requires each principal department of the state (department) to establish a schedule to review all of its rules. The act requires the review to occur at least every 5 years. Current law directs each department to make certain determinations when conducting the review of the rules. The act requires the following additional determinations:Whether the department has rules with the same or similar purpose, intent, or goal and, if so, how those are coordinated and whether redundant rules can be eliminated;Whether the rule is outdated or obsolete;Whether funding levels to support the program or function subject to the rule are appropriate; andWhether there are opportunities to improve the effectiveness of the rule in meeting its purpose, intent, or goal.     Current law requires each department to present a report at its 'SMART Act' hearing regarding its mandatory review of all rules. The act permits the committee of reference presiding over the 'SMART Act' hearing to make a recommendation whether a program or function subject to the rules should be subject to a sunset review or may make a recommendation to the legislative audit committee for an audit by the office of the state auditor.     The act clarifies the attorney general's responsibility regarding litigation discovery on behalf of the state of Colorado or on behalf of the people of the state of Colorado.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

69 added · 79 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes in Bill SB 137 focus on simplifying the process for reviewing rules set by state departments. The amendments specify that each principal department must conduct a review of its rules at least every five years and clarify the Attorney General's role in handling related legal proceedings. These changes aim to reduce bureaucratic red tape, which can help streamline operations and make government processes more efficient.

→
Previous
Latest
NOTE:
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
CONCERNING MEASURES TO REDUCE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDENS ,AND , IN CONNECTION THEREWITH ,MAKING CHANGES TO THE MANDATORY REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT RULES BY EACH PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT AND CLARIFYING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S SCOPE OF AUTHORITY RELATED TO LITIGATION DISCOVERY .
CONCERNING MEASURES TO REDUCE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDENS, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, MAKING CHANGES TO THE MANDATORY REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT RULES BY EACH PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT AND CLARIFYING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S SCOPE OF AUTHORITY RELATED TO LITIGATION DISCOVERY.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
Be it enacted by the General Assembly ofthe State ofColorado:
SECTION1.
SECTION 1.In ColoradoRevised Statutes, 24-4-103.3, amend (1) introductory portion, (1)(e), (1)(g), and (4);
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,24-4-103.3,amend(1) introductory portion, (1)(e), (1)(g), and (4);
and add (1)(i), (1)(j), (1)(k), and (1)(l) as follows:
and add (1)(i), (l)(j), (l)(k), and (1)(1) as follows:
(1) The department of regulatory agencies EACH PRINCIPAL ________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
(1) The department of Iegulatory agencies EACH PRINCIPAL Capital letters or&bitalic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsfrom existing law andsuch material is notpart of the act.
DEPARTMENT shall establish a schedule in consultation with each principal department, for thPERIODIC review of all of tDEPARTMENT S rules for each principal departmentTO OCCUR AT LEAST EVERY FIVE YEARS .
DEPARTMENT shall establish a schedule in consultation with each ptineipal department, for the PERIODIC review o f all o f the DEPARTMENT'S rulfor each ptincipal department TO OCCUR AT LEAST EVERY FIVE YEARS.
Each principal department shall conduct a review of all of its rules to assess the continuing need for and the appropriateness and cost-effectiveness of its rules to determine if they should be continued in their current form, modified,orrepealed.
Each principal department shall conduct a review o f all o f its rules to assess the continuing need for and the appropriateness and cost-effectiveness o f its rules to determine i f they should be continued in their current form, modified, or repealed.
The applicable rule-making agencyor official in the principal department shall consider the following:
The applicable rule-making agency or official in the principal department shall consider the following:
(e) Whethertherulecanbeamendedtogivemoreflexibility,reduce regulatory burdens, or reduce unnecessary paperwork or steps while maintainingMEETING itsINTENDED GOALS AND benefits;
(e) Whether the rule can be amended to give more flexibility, reduce regulatory burdens, or reduce unnecessary paperwork or steps while maintaining MEETING its INTENDED GOALS AND benefits;
(g) Whetheracost-benefitanalysiswasperformedbytheapplicable rule-making agency or official in the principal department pursuant to section 24-4-103 (2.5) andOR AN EQUIVALENT ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO SECTION 25-7-110.5;
(g) Whether a cost-benefit analysis was performed by the applicable rule-making agency or official in the principal department pursuant to section 24-4-103 (2.5) and OR AN EQUIVALENT ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO SECTION 25-7-110.5;
(i) W HETHER THERE ARE OTHER RULES ADOPTED BY THE RULE MAKING AGENCY OR OFFICIAL THAT HAVE THE SAME OR SIMILAR PURPOSE ,INTENT,ORGOAL ;HOWTHOSEARECOORDINATED ;ANDWHETHER REDUNDANCIES CAN BE ELIMINATED ;
(i) WHETHER THERE ARE OTHER RULES ADOPTED BY THE RULE-MAKING AGENCY OR OFFICIAL THAT HAVE THE SAME OR SIMILAR PURPOSE, INTENT, ORGOAL;
(j) W HETHER THE RULE IS OUTDATED OR OBSOLETE ;
HOW THOSE ARE COORDINATED;
(k) W HETHER FUNDING LEVELS TO SUPPORT THE PROGRAM OR FUNCTION SUBJECT TO THE RULE ARE APPROPRIATE .
AND WHETHER REDUNDANCIES CAN BE ELIMINATED;
AS USED IN THIS SUBSECTION (1)(k),"APPROPRIATE "MEANSSUFFICIENTTOADMINISTERAND ENFORCETHEPROGRAMORRULEINCOMPLIANCEWITHSTATEANDFEDERAL LAW ,WITHINEXISTINGAPPROPRIATIONSANDAUTHORIZEDFEESTRUCTURES .
G) WHETHER THE RULE IS OUTDATED OR OBSOLETE;
(l) W HETHER THERE ARE OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVE THE EFFECTIVENESSOFTHERULEINMEETINGITSPURPOSE ,INTENT ORGOAL .A S USEDINTHISSUBSECTION (1)(l)OPPORTUNITIES "MEANSREASONABLEAND LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE ADJUSTMENTS WITHIN THE AGENCY S EXISTING STATUTORY AUTHORITY THAT WOULD IMPROVE IMPLEMENTATION OR ADMINISTRATION OF THE RULE .
(k) WHETHER FUNDING LEVELS TO SUPPORT THE PROGRAM OR FUNCTION SUBJECT TO THE RULE ARE APPROPRIATE.
(3) The department of regulatory agencies shall not schedule mandatoryreview under this section during the year of and during the year PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-137 following any scheduled sunset review conducted by the department of regulatory agencies pursuant to section 24-34-104.
A s USED IN THIS SUBSECTION ( 1)(k), "APPROPRIATE" MEANS SUFFICIENTTOADMINISTERAND ENFORCETHE PROGRAM ORRULE IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAW, WITHIN EXISTINGAPPROPRIATIONS ANDAUTHORIZED FEESTRUCTURES.
(4) (a) Each principal department shall include a report on the results of its mandatory review of rules as part of its departmental regulatory agenda that it submits to the staff of the legislative council for distribution to the applicable committee of reference of the general assembly as outlined in section 2-7-203.
(I) WHETHER THERE ARE OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVE THE EFFECTIVENESS OFTHE RULE IN MEETINGITS PURPOSE, INTENT, ORGOAL.
C.R.S.T HE COMMITTEE OF REFERENCE SHALL REVIEW THE DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DURING THE COMMITTEE S"SMART A CT" HEARING .
AS USEDINTHIS SUBSECTION ( 1 )(I)"OPPORTUNITIES"MEANSREASONABLEAND LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE ADJUSTMENTS WITHIN THE AGENCY'S EXISTING STATUTORY AUTHORITY THAT WOULD IMPROVE IMPLEMENTATION OR ADMINISTRATION OF THE RULE.
(b) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCESS SET FORTH IN SECTION 24-34-104 (6)(a)AND (6)(c)THE COMMITTEE OF REFERENCE MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION WHETHER A PROGRAM OR FUNCTION SUBJECT TO THE RULES SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO A SUNSET REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-34-104 (5)OR MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE FOR AN AUDIT BY THE OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-3-108.
(3) The department of tegulatory agencies shall not schedule mandatory teview undet this section during the yeat ofand during the yeat PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-137 following any scheduled sunset review conducted by the department of regulatory agencies pmsuant to section 24-34-104.
(4) (a) Each principal department shall include a report on the results o f its mandatory review o f rules as part o f its departmental regulatory agenda that it submits to the staff o f the legislative council for distribution to the applicable committee o f reference o f the general assembly as outlined in section 2-7-203.
C.R.S.
THE COMMITTEE OF REFERENCE SHALL REVIEW THE DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DURING THE COMMITTEE'S "S M A R T ACT" HEARING.
(b) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCESS SET FORTH IN SECTION 24-34-104 (6)(a) AND (6)(c), THE COMMITTEE OF REFERENCE MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION WHETHER A PROGRAM OR FUNCTION SUBJECT TO THE RULES SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO A SUNSET REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-34-104 (5) OR MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE FOR AN AUDIT BY THE OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-3-108.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-31-101, add (6) as follows:
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-31-101add (6) as follows:
Powers and duties of attorney general.
Powers and duties ofattorney general.
(6) IN ANY ACTION BROUGHT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFICIAL CAPACITY, OR ON THE RELATION OF THE STATE OF C OLORADO OR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF C OLORADO , TO ENFORCE THE LAW AS AUTHORIZED BY STATUTE OR COMMON LAW , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO PURSUE AN ACTION ON BEHALF OF ANY OTHER STATE OFFICER OR ANY STATE AGENCY , DEPARTMENT ,OFFICE,BOARD ,COMMISSION ,ORENTERPRISEANDSHALLNOT BEDEEMEDINPOSSESSION ,CUSTODY ,ORCONTROLOFANYRECORDTHATIS MADE ,KEPT ,OR MAINTAINED BY ANY OTHER STATE OFFICER OR ANY STATE AGENCY , DEPARTMENT ,OFFICE,BOARD ,COMMISSION , OR ENTERPRISE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ANY DISCOVERY REQUEST DIRECTED AT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S OFFICIAL CAPACITY ,OR ON THE RELATION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ,AS A PARTY TO SUCH ACTION .
(6) IN ANY ACTION BROUGHT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICIAL CAPACITY, OR ON THE RELATION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, TO ENFORCE THE LAW AS AUTHORIZED BY STATUTE OR COMMON LAW, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO PURSUE AN ACTION ON BEHALF OF ANY OTHER STATE OFFICER OR ANY STATE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT, OFFICE, BOARD, COMMISSION, ORENTERPRISEAND SHALLNOT BE DEEMED IN POSSESSION, CUSTODY, OR CONTROL OF ANY RECORD THAT IS MADE, KEPT, OR MAINTAINED BY ANY OTHER STATE OFFICER OR ANY STATE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT, OFFICE, BOARD, COMMISSION, OR ENTERPRISE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ANY DISCOVERY REQUEST DIRECTED AT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICIAL CAPACITY, OR ON THE RELATION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, AS A PARTY TO SUCH ACTION.
This act PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-137 takes effect at 12:01 a.m.
This act PAG E 3-SENATE B IL L 26-137 takes effect at 12:01 a.m.
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiod after final adjournment of the general assembly(August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment ofthe general assembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
except that, if a referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestate constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approvedbythepeopleatthegeneralelectiontobeheldinNovember2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuantto section 1(3) ofarticle V ofthe state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved bythepeople at the general electionto beheld in November2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date ofthe official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
ulie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF ~ ! .0 - COF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES V , Esther van Mourik ~ ~ lly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED o
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-137
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  3. Sent to the Governor

  4. Signed by the President of the Senate

  5. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments

  7. House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  8. House Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

  9. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  10. Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor

  11. Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole

  12. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments

  13. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee

  14. Senate Committee on Finance Refer Amended to Appropriations

  15. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Finance

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 22 co-sponsors · 75 not signed on · 49 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (22)

Not signed on (75)

75 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 75 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

BILL

Passed 55 Yea · 8 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 39002
Republican 11800
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 55802
% of votes cast 85%12%0%3%
How each member voted (65)
Member Party Vote
Gonzalez R. — Yea
Stewart K. — Yea
Stewart R. — Yea
Winter T. — Yea
Garcia Sander — Yea
Alex Valdez Democrat Not Voting
Amy Paschal Democrat Yea
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Bob Marshall Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Yea
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Eliza Hamrick Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Emily Sirota Democrat Yea
Gretchen Rydin Democrat Yea
Jacque Phillips Democrat Yea
Jamie Jackson Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Yea
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Not Voting
Jenny Willford Democrat Yea
Julie McCluskie Democrat Yea
Junie Joseph Democrat Yea
Karen McCormick Democrat Yea
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Yea
Kyle Brown Democrat Yea
Lesley Smith Democrat Yea
Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat Yea
Lisa Feret Democrat Yea
Lorena Garcia Democrat Yea
Lori Goldstein Democrat Yea
Mandy Lindsay Democrat Yea
Manny Rutinel Democrat Yea
Matthew Martinez Democrat Yea
Meg Froelich Democrat Yea
Meghan Lukens Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Monica Duran Democrat Yea
Naquetta Ricks Democrat Yea
Regina English Democrat Yea
Sean Camacho Democrat Yea
Sheila Lieder Democrat Yea
Steven Woodrow Democrat Yea
Tammy Story Democrat Yea
Tisha Mauro Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Anthony Hartsook Republican Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Yea
Brandi Bradley Republican Nay
Carlos Barron Republican Yea
Chris Richardson Republican Yea
Dan Woog Republican Nay
Dusty Johnson Republican Yea
Jarvis Caldwell Republican Yea
Ken DeGraaf Republican Nay
Larry Don Suckla Republican Nay
Mary Bradfield Republican Yea
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Max Brooks Republican Nay
Rebecca Keltie Republican Yea
Rick Taggart Republican Yea
Ron Weinberg Republican Nay
Scott Bottoms Republican Nay
Scott Slaugh Republican Yea
Stephanie Luck Republican Nay

Official roll call →

PERM

Failed 20 Yea · 43 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 03902
Republican 17200
Unaffiliated 3200
Total 204302
% of votes cast 31%66%0%3%
How each member voted (65)
Member Party Vote
Gonzalez R. — Yea
Stewart K. — Nay
Stewart R. — Nay
Winter T. — Yea
Garcia Sander — Yea
Alex Valdez Democrat Not Voting
Amy Paschal Democrat Nay
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Nay
Bob Marshall Democrat Nay
Brianna Titone Democrat Nay
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Nay
Chad Clifford Democrat Nay
Eliza Hamrick Democrat Nay
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Nay
Emily Sirota Democrat Nay
Gretchen Rydin Democrat Nay
Jacque Phillips Democrat Nay
Jamie Jackson Democrat Nay
Javier Mabrey Democrat Nay
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Not Voting
Jenny Willford Democrat Nay
Julie McCluskie Democrat Nay
Junie Joseph Democrat Nay
Karen McCormick Democrat Nay
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Nay
Kyle Brown Democrat Nay
Lesley Smith Democrat Nay
Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat Nay
Lisa Feret Democrat Nay
Lorena Garcia Democrat Nay
Lori Goldstein Democrat Nay
Mandy Lindsay Democrat Nay
Manny Rutinel Democrat Nay
Matthew Martinez Democrat Nay
Meg Froelich Democrat Nay
Meghan Lukens Democrat Nay
Michael Carter Democrat Nay
Monica Duran Democrat Nay
Naquetta Ricks Democrat Nay
Regina English Democrat Nay
Sean Camacho Democrat Nay
Sheila Lieder Democrat Nay
Steven Woodrow Democrat Nay
Tammy Story Democrat Nay
Tisha Mauro Democrat Nay
Yara Zokaie Democrat Nay
Anthony Hartsook Republican Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Yea
Brandi Bradley Republican Yea
Carlos Barron Republican Yea
Chris Richardson Republican Yea
Dan Woog Republican Yea
Dusty Johnson Republican Yea
Jarvis Caldwell Republican Nay
Ken DeGraaf Republican Yea
Larry Don Suckla Republican Yea
Mary Bradfield Republican Yea
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Max Brooks Republican Yea
Rebecca Keltie Republican Yea
Rick Taggart Republican Yea
Ron Weinberg Republican Yea
Scott Bottoms Republican Yea
Scott Slaugh Republican Nay
Stephanie Luck Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 5000
Democrat 7001
Total 12001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Bob Marshall Democrat Yea
Gretchen Rydin Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Yea
Naquetta Ricks Democrat Yea
Regina English Democrat Not Voting
Sean Camacho Democrat Yea
Sheila Lieder Democrat Yea
Tisha Mauro Democrat Yea
Chris Richardson Republican Yea
Larry Don Suckla Republican Yea
Max Brooks Republican Yea
Rebecca Keltie Republican Yea
Ryan Gonzalez Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 4000
Republican 3000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Julie Gonzales Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Byron Pelton Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 3000
Democrat 5000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 137 do?
Current law requires each principal department of the state (department) to establish a schedule to review all of its rules. The act requires the review to occur at least every 5 years. Current law directs each department to make certain determinations when conducting the review of the rules. The act requires the following additional determinations:Whether the department has rules with the same or similar purpose, intent, or goal and, if so, how those are coordinated and whether redundant rules can be eliminated;Whether the rule is outdated or obsolete;Whether funding levels to support the program or function subject to the rule are appropriate; andWhether there are opportunities to improve the effectiveness of the rule in meeting its purpose, intent, or goal.     Current law requires each department to present a report at its 'SMART Act' hearing regarding its mandatory review of all rules. The act permits the committee of reference presiding over the 'SMART Act' hearing to make a recommendation whether a program or function subject to the rules should be subject to a sunset review or may make a recommendation to the legislative audit committee for an audit by the office of the state auditor.     The act clarifies the attorney general's responsibility regarding litigation discovery on behalf of the state of Colorado or on behalf of the people of the state of Colorado.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors SB 137?
SB 137 is sponsored by G. Rydin, N. Ricks, B. Marshall, R. Gonzalez, A. Flanell, M. Duran, C. Clifford, A. Boesenecker, J. McCluskie, J. Caldwell, Jeff Bridges (Democrat), John Carson (Republican), Marc Catlin (Republican), Lindsey Daugherty (Democrat), Tony Exum (Democrat), Lisa Frizell (Republican), Julie Gonzales (Democrat), Barbara Kirkmeyer (Republican), Janice Marchman (Democrat), Kyle Mullica (Democrat), Marc Snyder (Democrat), Cleave Simpson (Republican), William Lindstedt (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), Judy Amabile (Democrat), and Dylan Roberts (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 137?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 11, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 137?
Track SB 137 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 137

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 137

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →