SB 137 — Measures to Reduce Administrative Burdens
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 11, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 14, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
26 sponsors
4 primary, 22 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (11 D · 5 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Mixed recorded votes
6 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Current law requires each principal department of the state (department) to establish a schedule to review all of its rules. The act requires the review to occur at least every 5 years. Current law directs each department to make certain determinations when conducting the review of the rules. The act requires the following additional determinations:Whether the department has rules with the same or similar purpose, intent, or goal and, if so, how those are coordinated and whether redundant rules can be eliminated;Whether the rule is outdated or obsolete;Whether funding levels to support the program or function subject to the rule are appropriate; andWhether there are opportunities to improve the effectiveness of the rule in meeting its purpose, intent, or goal. Current law requires each department to present a report at its 'SMART Act' hearing regarding its mandatory review of all rules. The act permits the committee of reference presiding over the 'SMART Act' hearing to make a recommendation whether a program or function subject to the rules should be subject to a sunset review or may make a recommendation to the legislative audit committee for an audit by the office of the state auditor. The act clarifies the attorney general's responsibility regarding litigation discovery on behalf of the state of Colorado or on behalf of the people of the state of Colorado.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
69 added · 79 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes in Bill SB 137 focus on simplifying the process for reviewing rules set by state departments. The amendments specify that each principal department must conduct a review of its rules at least every five years and clarify the Attorney General's role in handling related legal proceedings. These changes aim to reduce bureaucratic red tape, which can help streamline operations and make government processes more efficient.
NOTE:
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
CONCERNING MEASURES TO REDUCE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDENSBURDENS, ,ANDAND, , IN CONNECTION THEREWITHTHEREWITH, ,MAKINGMAKING CHANGES TO THE MANDATORY REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT RULES BY EACH PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT AND CLARIFYING THE ATTORNEY GENERALGENERAL'S S SCOPE OF AUTHORITY RELATED TO LITIGATION DISCOVERYDISCOVERY. .
Be it enacted by the General Assembly ofofthe the State ofofColorado: Colorado:
SECTION1.SECTION 1.In ColoradoRevised Statutes, 24-4-103.3, amend (1) introductory portion, (1)(e), (1)(g), and (4);
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,24-4-103.3,amend(1) introductory portion, (1)(e), (1)(g), and (4);
and add (1)(i), (1)(j),(l)(j), (1)(k),(l)(k), and (1)(l)(1)(1) as follows:
(1) The department of regulatoryIegulatory agencies EACH PRINCIPAL ________ Capital letters oror&bitalic bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsdeletionsfrom from existing law andandsuch such material is notnotpart part of the act.
DEPARTMENT shall establish a schedule in consultation with each principalptineipal department, for thPERIODICthe PERIODIC review ofo f all ofo tDEPARTMENTf Sthe rulesDEPARTMENT'S forrulfor each principalptincipal departmentTOdepartment TO OCCUR AT LEAST EVERY FIVE YEARSYEARS. .
Each principal department shall conduct a review ofo f all ofo f its rules to assess the continuing need for and the appropriateness and cost-effectiveness ofo f its rules to determine ifi f they should be continued in their current form, modified,orrepealed.modified, or repealed.
The applicable rule-making agencyoragency or official in the principal department shall consider the following:
(e) Whethertherulecanbeamendedtogivemoreflexibility,reduceWhether the rule can be amended to give more flexibility, reduce regulatory burdens, or reduce unnecessary paperwork or steps while maintainingMEETINGmaintaining itsINTENDEDMEETING its INTENDED GOALS AND benefits;
(g) Whetheracost-benefitanalysiswasperformedbytheapplicableWhether a cost-benefit analysis was performed by the applicable rule-making agency or official in the principal department pursuant to section 24-4-103 (2.5) andORand OR AN EQUIVALENT ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO SECTION 25-7-110.5;
(i) WWHETHER HETHER THERE ARE OTHER RULES ADOPTED BY THE RULERULE-MAKING MAKING AGENCY OR OFFICIAL THAT HAVE THE SAME OR SIMILAR PURPOSEPURPOSE, ,INTENT,ORGOALINTENT, ;HOWTHOSEARECOORDINATEDORGOAL; ;ANDWHETHER REDUNDANCIES CAN BE ELIMINATED ;
(j)HOW WTHOSE HETHERARE THECOORDINATED; RULE IS OUTDATED OR OBSOLETE ;
(k)AND WWHETHER HETHERREDUNDANCIES FUNDINGCAN LEVELSBE TOELIMINATED; SUPPORT THE PROGRAM OR FUNCTION SUBJECT TO THE RULE ARE APPROPRIATE .
ASG) USEDWHETHER INTHE THISRULE SUBSECTIONIS (1)(k),"APPROPRIATEOUTDATED "MEANSSUFFICIENTTOADMINISTERANDOR ENFORCETHEPROGRAMORRULEINCOMPLIANCEWITHSTATEANDFEDERALOBSOLETE; LAW ,WITHINEXISTINGAPPROPRIATIONSANDAUTHORIZEDFEESTRUCTURES .
(l)(k) WWHETHER HETHERFUNDING THERELEVELS ARE OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVESUPPORT THE EFFECTIVENESSOFTHERULEINMEETINGITSPURPOSEPROGRAM ,INTENTOR ORGOALFUNCTION .ASUBJECT STO USEDINTHISSUBSECTION (1)(l)OPPORTUNITIES "MEANSREASONABLEAND LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE ADJUSTMENTS WITHIN THE AGENCY S EXISTING STATUTORY AUTHORITY THAT WOULD IMPROVE IMPLEMENTATION OR ADMINISTRATION OF THE RULE .ARE APPROPRIATE.
(3)A Thes departmentUSED ofIN regulatoryTHIS agenciesSUBSECTION shall( not1)(k), schedule"APPROPRIATE" mandatoryreviewMEANS underSUFFICIENTTOADMINISTERAND thisENFORCETHE sectionPROGRAM duringORRULE theIN yearCOMPLIANCE ofWITH andSTATE duringAND theFEDERAL yearLAW, PAGEWITHIN 2-SENATEEXISTINGAPPROPRIATIONS BILLANDAUTHORIZED 26-137FEESTRUCTURES. following any scheduled sunset review conducted by the department of regulatory agencies pursuant to section 24-34-104.
(4)(I) (a)WHETHER EachTHERE principalARE departmentOPPORTUNITIES shallTO includeIMPROVE aTHE reportEFFECTIVENESS onOFTHE theRULE resultsIN ofMEETINGITS itsPURPOSE, mandatoryINTENT, reviewORGOAL. of rules as part of its departmental regulatory agenda that it submits to the staff of the legislative council for distribution to the applicable committee of reference of the general assembly as outlined in section 2-7-203.
C.R.S.TAS HEUSEDINTHIS COMMITTEESUBSECTION OF( REFERENCE1 SHALL)(I)"OPPORTUNITIES"MEANSREASONABLEAND REVIEWLEGALLY PERMISSIBLE ADJUSTMENTS WITHIN THE DEPARTMENTALAGENCY'S REPORTEXISTING DURINGSTATUTORY THEAUTHORITY COMMITTEETHAT S"SMARTWOULD AIMPROVE CT"IMPLEMENTATION HEARINGOR .ADMINISTRATION OF THE RULE.
(b)(3) INThe ACCORDANCEdepartment WITHof THEtegulatory PROCESSagencies SETshall FORTHnot INschedule SECTIONmandatory 24-34-104teview (6)(a)ANDundet (6)(c)THEthis COMMITTEEsection OFduring REFERENCEthe MAYyeat MAKEofand Aduring RECOMMENDATIONthe WHETHERyeat APAGE PROGRAM2-SENATE ORBILL FUNCTION26-137 SUBJECTfollowing TOany THEscheduled RULESsunset SHOULDreview BEconducted SUBJECTby TOthe Adepartment SUNSETof REVIEWregulatory PURSUANTagencies TOpmsuant SECTIONto 24-34-104section (5)OR24-34-104. MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE FOR AN AUDIT BY THE OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-3-108.
(4) (a) Each principal department shall include a report on the results o f its mandatory review o f rules as part o f its departmental regulatory agenda that it submits to the staff o f the legislative council for distribution to the applicable committee o f reference o f the general assembly as outlined in section 2-7-203.
C.R.S.
THE COMMITTEE OF REFERENCE SHALL REVIEW THE DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DURING THE COMMITTEE'S "S M A R T ACT" HEARING.
(b) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCESS SET FORTH IN SECTION 24-34-104 (6)(a) AND (6)(c), THE COMMITTEE OF REFERENCE MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION WHETHER A PROGRAM OR FUNCTION SUBJECT TO THE RULES SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO A SUNSET REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-34-104 (5) OR MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE FOR AN AUDIT BY THE OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-3-108.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-31-101,24-31-101add add (6) as follows:
Powers and duties ofofattorney attorney general.
(6) IN ANY ACTION BROUGHT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE ATTORNEY GENERALGENERAL'S S OFFICIAL CAPACITY, OR ON THE RELATION OF THE STATE OF CCOLORADO OLORADO OR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CCOLORADO, OLORADO , TO ENFORCE THE LAW AS AUTHORIZED BY STATUTE OR COMMON LAWLAW, , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO PURSUE AN ACTION ON BEHALF OF ANY OTHER STATE OFFICER OR ANY STATE AGENCYAGENCY, ,DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENTOFFICE, ,OFFICE,BOARDBOARD, ,COMMISSIONCOMMISSION, ,ORENTERPRISEANDSHALLNOTORENTERPRISEAND BEDEEMEDINPOSSESSIONSHALLNOT ,CUSTODYBE ,ORCONTROLOFANYRECORDTHATISDEEMED MADEIN ,KEPTPOSSESSION, ,ORCUSTODY, OR CONTROL OF ANY RECORD THAT IS MADE, KEPT, OR MAINTAINED BY ANY OTHER STATE OFFICER OR ANY STATE AGENCYAGENCY, ,DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENTOFFICE, ,OFFICE,BOARDBOARD, ,COMMISSIONCOMMISSION, , OR ENTERPRISE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ANY DISCOVERY REQUEST DIRECTED AT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE ATTORNEY GENERALGENERAL'S S OFFICIAL CAPACITYCAPACITY, ,OROR ON THE RELATION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO OR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADOCOLORADO, ,ASAS A PARTY TO SUCH ACTIONACTION. .
This act PAGEPAG E 3-SENATE BILLB IL L 26-137 takes effect at 12:01 a.m.
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiodninety-day period after final adjournment ofofthe the general assembly(Augustassembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
except that, if a referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestatereferendum petition is filed pursuantto section 1(3) ofarticle V ofthe state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approvedbythepeopleatthegeneralelectiontobeheldinNovember2026approved bythepeople at the general electionto beheld in November2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date ofofthe the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julieulie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER~ OF! .0 - COF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________V ____________________________, Esther van Mourik Vanessa~ Reilly~ lly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________APPROVED (Dateo and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-137
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor
-
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
Senate Committee on Finance Refer Amended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Finance
Sponsors
- G. Rydin · Cosponsor
- N. Ricks · Cosponsor
- B. Marshall · Cosponsor
- R. Gonzalez · Cosponsor
- A. Flanell · Cosponsor
- M. Duran · Cosponsor
- C. Clifford · Cosponsor
- A. Boesenecker · Cosponsor
- J. McCluskie · Primary
- J. Caldwell · Primary
- Jeff Bridges · Cosponsor
- John Carson · Cosponsor
- Marc Catlin · Cosponsor
- Lindsey Daugherty · Cosponsor
- Tony Exum · Cosponsor
- Lisa Frizell · Cosponsor
- Julie Gonzales · Cosponsor
- Barbara Kirkmeyer · Cosponsor
- Janice Marchman · Cosponsor
- Kyle Mullica · Cosponsor
- Marc Snyder · Cosponsor
- Cleave Simpson · Primary
- William Lindstedt · Cosponsor
- James Coleman · Primary
- Judy Amabile · Cosponsor
- Dylan Roberts · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 22 co-sponsors · 75 not signed on · 49 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- J. McCluskie
- J. Caldwell
- Cleave Simpson Republican
- James Coleman Democrat
Co-sponsors (22)
- G. Rydin
- N. Ricks
- B. Marshall
- R. Gonzalez
- A. Flanell
- M. Duran
- C. Clifford
- A. Boesenecker
- Jeff Bridges Democrat
- John Carson Republican
- Marc Catlin Republican
- Lindsey Daugherty Democrat
- Tony Exum Democrat
- Lisa Frizell Republican
- Julie Gonzales Democrat
- Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican
- Janice Marchman Democrat
- Kyle Mullica Democrat
- Marc Snyder Democrat
- William Lindstedt Democrat
- Judy Amabile Democrat
- Dylan Roberts Democrat
Not signed on (75)
75 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 75 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 39 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 11 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 12% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez R. | — | Yea |
| Stewart K. | — | Yea |
| Stewart R. | — | Yea |
| Winter T. | — | Yea |
| Garcia Sander | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Amy Paschal | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Gretchen Rydin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jacque Phillips | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kenny Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Lesley Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsay Gilchrist | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Feret | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Lori Goldstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Manny Rutinel | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew Martinez | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Meghan Lukens | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Carlos Barron | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Nay |
| Dusty Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Jarvis Caldwell | Republican | Yea |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 39 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 43 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 31% | 66% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez R. | — | Yea |
| Stewart K. | — | Nay |
| Stewart R. | — | Nay |
| Winter T. | — | Yea |
| Garcia Sander | — | Yea |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Amy Paschal | Democrat | Nay |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Nay |
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Nay |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Nay |
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Nay |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Nay |
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Nay |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Nay |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Nay |
| Gretchen Rydin | Democrat | Nay |
| Jacque Phillips | Democrat | Nay |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Nay |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Nay |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Nay |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Nay |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Nay |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Nay |
| Kenny Nguyen | Democrat | Nay |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Nay |
| Lesley Smith | Democrat | Nay |
| Lindsay Gilchrist | Democrat | Nay |
| Lisa Feret | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Lori Goldstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Nay |
| Manny Rutinel | Democrat | Nay |
| Matthew Martinez | Democrat | Nay |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Nay |
| Meghan Lukens | Democrat | Nay |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Nay |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Nay |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Nay |
| Regina English | Democrat | Nay |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Nay |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Nay |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Nay |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Nay |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Nay |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Nay |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Yea |
| Carlos Barron | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Yea |
| Dusty Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Jarvis Caldwell | Republican | Nay |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Gretchen Rydin | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Yea |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Gonzalez | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 137 do?
- Current law requires each principal department of the state (department) to establish a schedule to review all of its rules. The act requires the review to occur at least every 5 years. Current law directs each department to make certain determinations when conducting the review of the rules. The act requires the following additional determinations:Whether the department has rules with the same or similar purpose, intent, or goal and, if so, how those are coordinated and whether redundant rules can be eliminated;Whether the rule is outdated or obsolete;Whether funding levels to support the program or function subject to the rule are appropriate; andWhether there are opportunities to improve the effectiveness of the rule in meeting its purpose, intent, or goal. Current law requires each department to present a report at its 'SMART Act' hearing regarding its mandatory review of all rules. The act permits the committee of reference presiding over the 'SMART Act' hearing to make a recommendation whether a program or function subject to the rules should be subject to a sunset review or may make a recommendation to the legislative audit committee for an audit by the office of the state auditor. The act clarifies the attorney general's responsibility regarding litigation discovery on behalf of the state of Colorado or on behalf of the people of the state of Colorado.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 137?
- SB 137 is sponsored by G. Rydin, N. Ricks, B. Marshall, R. Gonzalez, A. Flanell, M. Duran, C. Clifford, A. Boesenecker, J. McCluskie, J. Caldwell, Jeff Bridges (Democrat), John Carson (Republican), Marc Catlin (Republican), Lindsey Daugherty (Democrat), Tony Exum (Democrat), Lisa Frizell (Republican), Julie Gonzales (Democrat), Barbara Kirkmeyer (Republican), Janice Marchman (Democrat), Kyle Mullica (Democrat), Marc Snyder (Democrat), Cleave Simpson (Republican), William Lindstedt (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), Judy Amabile (Democrat), and Dylan Roberts (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 137?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 11, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 137?
- Track SB 137 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 137
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 137
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →