Protections for Worker Safety
This bill aims to improve workplace safety and health protections for all workers.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1054 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1054.
You're tracking HB 1054
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1054 — Protections for Worker Safety
Last action — Senate Third Reading Lost with Amendments - Floor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 14, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
22 sponsors
3 primary, 19 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (21 D).
-
Mixed recorded votes
14 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill mandates employers to maintain a safe and hazard-free workplace.
This bill requires employers to ensure their workplaces are free from recognized hazards and comply with health and safety standards. It also allows for civil actions and penalties for violations to aid in workplace health and safety enforcement.
What this means for you
- Workers: This bill aims to improve workplace safety and health protections for all workers.
Summary
Section 1 of the bill requires an employer to ensure the employer's workplace is free from recognized hazards, as interpreted consistent with the federal occupational safety and health administration's interpretation of the general duty clause of the 'Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970' (OSH Act) as of September 1, 2025. Additionally, employers have the general duty to:Ensure that each workplace is constructed, equipped, arranged, operated, and conducted as to provide reasonable and adequate protection to the lives, health, and safety of all individuals employed or working in the workplace; andComply with standards for workplace health and safety adopted by rule by the division of labor standards and statistics in the department of labor and employment (division) attorney general. The bill authorizes the following actions to address workplace health and safety concerns:The attorney general or the division may refer workplace health and safety concerns to relevant state or local authorities;The attorney general, the division, a labor organization, a worker organization, or a person aggrieved by a violation of the bill may file a civil action;For each violation of the bill or of rules adopted pursuant to the bill, a court may order the person an employer that violates the bill or rules to pay statutory damages to a person aggrieved by the violation; andA court may order a person an employer that violates the bill or rules adopted pursuant to the bill to pay a penalty to the attorney general for each violation. The bill creates the workplace health and safety fund (fund) into which penalties collected pursuant to the bill are credited. The money in the fund may be used by the division attorney general for specified purposes. The bill authorizes the division attorney general to adopt rules:To replace any requirement of the OSH Act or the 'Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977' that is repealed or revoked; or amended in any manner that results in the federal protections of workers' rights or worker safety becoming less stringent; and To define standards for workplace health and safety if there is no standard in effect under the OSH Act; andAs necessary to implement the bill. Section 2 authorizes the attorney general to apply to the appropriate district court for an order for specified relief if a person fails to obey an investigative demand, subpoena, warrant, or other investigative process related to worker and employee protection. Sections 2 3 through 8 11 make conforming amendments.(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
253 added · 241 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of Bill HB 1054 now includes a summary of all amendments made during its second reading in the legislative process, which highlights the collaborative effort of multiple lawmakers in improving worker safety protections. Importantly, it clarifies that employers must ensure their workplaces are free from recognized hazards according to federal safety standards. This change is significant because it reinforces the commitment to creating safer work environments and holds employers accountable for maintaining those standards.
Second Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REENGROSSEDREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted on Second Reading in the HouseSecond ofHouse Introduction LLS NO.
26-0599.01 Josh Schultz x5486 HOUSE BILL 26-1054 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP RutinelandVelasco, Bacon,Brown,Camacho,Clifford,Duran,Froelich,Jackson,Joseph, Lieder, Lindsay, Mabrey, McCormick, Nguyen, Phillips, Sirota, Smith, Titone, Woodrow, Zokaie SENATE SPONSORSHIP Wallace, House Committees Senate Committees Business Affairs & Labor State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Appropriations Appropriations g A BILL FOR AN ACT i a C ONCERNING WORKER SAFETY PROTECTIONS .
E R 2 T d 20 N 2 8 S e a Bill Summary n M e (Note:
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does A notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that de applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at dn e 6 http://leg.colorado.gov.) Em a2 0 S Un ,2 OU ig 5 Section1ofthebillrequiresanemployertoensuretheemployer's H ad ay workplaceisfreefromrecognizedhazards,asinterpretedconsistentwithe R M rworkplaceisfreefromrecognizedhazards,asinterpretedconsistentwith R the federal occupational safetyand health administration's interpretation 3 of the general dutyclause of the "Occupational Safetyand Health Act of 1970"(OSHAct)asofSeptember1,2025.Additionally,employershave the general duty to:
ni ! Ensure that each workplace is constructed, equipped, da 62 Earranged,operated,andconductedastoprovidereasonable eS 0R arranged,operated,andconductedastoprovidereasonable2 U d ,4 OH 2 y Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
H d M Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.d Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
e m A and adequate protection to the lives, health, and safety of all individuals employed or working in the workplace;
8-14.4-206.
Attorney general additional budget request.
IF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DETERMINES THAT ADDITIONAL RESOURCES ARE NEEDED TO EFFECTIVELY ADMINISTER THIS PAR2,THE ATTORNEYGENERALSHALLREQUESTTHEADDITIONALRESOURCESINTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL S BUDGET REQUEST TO THE JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE .
-8- 1054 (b) G RANT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN COMPLIANCEWITHINVESTIGATIVEDEMANDS SUBPOENAS,SUBPOENAS ,WARRANTS ,OR OTHER INVESTIGATIVE PROCESSES ISSUED OR CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)OF THIS SECTI;AND (c) GRANT FURTHER RELIEF AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO OBTAIN COMPLIANCEWITHINVESTIGATIVEDEMANDS ,SUBPOENAS,WARRANTS,SUBPOENAS ,WARRANTS ,OR -8- 1054 OTHER INVESTIGATIVE PROCESSES ISSUED OR CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)OF THIS SECTI.N (4) C OSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES SHALL BE AWARDED TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHERE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SUCCESSFULLY ENFORCES THIS SECTIO.
(4) C OSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES SHALL BE AWARDED TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHERE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SUCCESSFULLY ENFORCES THIS SECTION.
(2) (b) If the division of labor standards and statistics has not -9- 1054 referred a wage determination to the unit, the unit mayenforce the wage determination if the unit provides written notice to the division of labor standards and statistics of the unit's intent to enforce the wage determination.
(II) Has attempted to pursue enforcement of the wage -9- 1054 determination and has been unsuccessful in enforcing the determination in full after the later of twelve months after the determination or the conclusion of any appeals;
-10- 1054 As used in this articlearticlePART41, 14.41, unless the context otherwise requires:
-10- 1054 (2) (b) A contract or agreement that violates subsection (2)(a) of this section is void and unenforceable as contrary to the public policy of this state.A principal's attempt to impose such a contract or agreement is an adverse action in violation of this article 14.4 (4) A principal shall not discriminate, take adverse action, or retaliate against a worker based on the worker opposing anypractice the worker reasonably believes is unlawful under this article 14.4 for making a charge, testifying, assisting, or participating in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing as to any matter the worker reasonably believes to be unlawful under this article 14.4 SECTION 7.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 8-14.4-105, amend -11- 1054 (1)(a), (1)(b)(I), and (2)(a) as follows:
-11- 1054 (b) Until the date the division makes a complaint form publicly available:
(2) A court mayorder affirmative relief that the court determines tobeappropriate,includingthefollowingrelief,againstarespondentwho is found to have engaged in a discriminatory, adverse, or retaliatory employment practice prohibited by this article 14.4 (3)(a) Inadditiontothereliefavailablepursuanttosubsection(2) -12- 1054 of this section, in a civil action brought by a plaintiff under this article 14.4 PART1 against a defendant who is found to have engaged in an intentional discriminatory, adverse, or retaliatory employment practice, theplaintiffmayrecovercompensatoryandpunitivedamagesasspecified in this subsection (3).
(b) A plaintiff mayrecoverpunitivedamages against a defendant -12- 1054 if the plaintiff demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant engaged in a discriminatory, adverse, or retaliatory employment practice with malice or recklessindifference to the rights of the plaintiff.
-13- 1054 (b) Atthetimethattheactionisfiled,thewhistleblowershallgive writtennoticetothedivisionofthespecificprovisionsofthisarticle14.4 PART 1 alleged to have been violated.
(a) Seventy-five percent to the division for enforcement of this -13- 1054 article 14.PART14.4ART1; 1;
The money in thLEGALtheLEGAL SERVICES CASH fund and all interest earned on such money is subject to annual appropriationbythegeneralassemblytothedepartmentforthedirectand indirect costs associated with providing legal services to state governmentalentitiesandforanyofthedepartment'slitigationexpenses.
Any unexpended money in thetheLEGAL LEGAL SERVICES CASHfundCASH fund at the end of thefiscalyearremainsinthe thLEGALSERVICESCASHfiscal yearremainsintLEGALSERVICESCASH fund and shallnotbeshall not be credited or transferred to any other fund.
(7) (a) THE STATE TREASURER SHALL CREDIT PENALTIES COLLECTED FOR THE STATE PURSUANT TO PART 2 OF ARTICLE 14.414.4OF OF TITLE 8TO THE WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY FUND ,WHICH FUND IS -14- 1054 CREATED IN THE STATE TREASURY .
THE MONEY IN THE WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY FUND MAY BE USED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALTOGENERAL TO COVER DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITHWIT: :
(I) ENFORCEMENTNFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES AUTHORIZED IN PART2PAR2 OFOFARTICLE ARTICLE14.4OF 14.4 OF TITLE8;
(II) CCREATING, REATING, DISTRIBUTING, SHARINGSHARING, , AND PUBLICIZING -14- 1054 MATERIALS DESIGNED TO EDUCATE WORKERS AND EMPLOYERS ABOUT THEIR OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE FEDERAL"OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND H EALTH ACT OF1970", 29 U.S.CSEC.
-15- 1054 (c) THET HE LIMITATIONS SPECIFIED IN SECTI24-75-402SECTIO24-75-402DO DO NOT APPLY TO THE WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY FUND.FUND .
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate -15- 1054 preservationofthepublicpeace,health,orsafetyorforappropriationsfor the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
View plain text versions (4)
- Revised View text Current pdf May 08, 2026
- Engrossed Reengrossed pdf May 05, 2026
- Engrossed View text pdf May 04, 2026
- Introduced View text pdf January 14, 2026
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill establishes new worker safety protections and enforcement mechanisms in Colorado, instituting duties for employers and rights for workers regarding workplace safety.
-
8-14.4-203
AN EMPLOYER SHALL ENSURE THE EMPLOYER'S WORKPLACE IS FREE FROM RECOGNIZED HAZARDS, WHICH DUTY SHALL BE INTERPRETED CONSISTENT WITH THE FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION'S INTERPRETATION OF THE GENERAL DUTY CLAUSE OF THE OSH ACT, 29 U.S.C. SEC. 654 (a)(1) AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 2025.
This creates a new requirement for employers to maintain workplaces free from recognized hazards, aligning state law with federal guidelines.
-
8-14.4-204
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY REFER WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY CONCERNS TO RELEVANT STATE OR LOCAL AUTHORITIES.
This provision allows the Attorney General to refer workplace health and safety concerns to local authorities for enforcement.
-
8-14.4-204
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, A LABOR ORGANIZATION, A WORKER ORGANIZATION, OR A PERSON AGGRIEVED BY A VIOLATION OF THIS PART 2 MAY FILE A CIVIL ACTION AGAINST AN EMPLOYER THAT VIOLATES THIS PART 2 FOR ALL AVAILABLE EQUITABLE RELIEF.
This grants individuals and organizations the right to take legal action against employers for violations of workplace safety regulations.
-
8-14.4-204
A COURT MAY AWARD A PERSON FOUND TO HAVE BEEN AGGRIEVED BY A VIOLATION OF THIS PART 2 STATUTORY DAMAGES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS PER VIOLATION.
This establishes statutory damages for individuals harmed by violations of the new workplace safety regulations.
-
8-14.4-204
THE COURT MAY ORDER AN EMPLOYER THAT VIOLATES THIS SECTION TO PAY A PENALTY FOR EACH VIOLATION OF THIS PART OR RULES ADOPTED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
This allows courts to impose penalties on employers for violating workplace safety standards.
-
8-14.4-205
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY, AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE, ADOPT RULES ESTABLISHING A STATE STANDARD FOR EMPLOYERS IN THE STATE THAT IS AS STRINGENT AS OR MORE STRINGENT THAN THE FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH OR SAFETY STANDARD BEING REPEALED OR REVOKED AS A MINIMUM STANDARD FOR EMPLOYERS IN THIS STATE.
This allows the Attorney General to set state safety standards that exceed federal regulations when they are repealed or revoked.
Action History
-
Senate Third Reading Lost with Amendments - Floor
-
Senate Third Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Refer Unamended to Appropriations
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to State, Veterans, & Military Affairs
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
House Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Amended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor
Sponsors
- K. Wallace · Primary
- Manny Rutinel · Primary
- Elizabeth Velasco · Primary
- Kyle Brown · Cosponsor
- Sean Camacho · Cosponsor
- Chad Clifford · Cosponsor
- Monica Duran · Cosponsor
- Meg Froelich · Cosponsor
- Junie Joseph · Cosponsor
- Sheila Lieder · Cosponsor
- Mandy Lindsay · Cosponsor
- Javier Mabrey · Cosponsor
- Karen McCormick · Cosponsor
- Kenny Nguyen · Cosponsor
- Emily Sirota · Cosponsor
- Lesley Smith · Cosponsor
- Brianna Titone · Cosponsor
- Steven Woodrow · Cosponsor
- Yara Zokaie · Cosponsor
- Jamie Jackson · Cosponsor
- Jennifer Bacon · Cosponsor
- Jacque Phillips · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 19 co-sponsors · 80 not signed on · 26 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- K. Wallace
- Manny Rutinel Democrat
- Elizabeth Velasco Democrat
Co-sponsors (19)
- Kyle Brown Democrat
- Sean Camacho Democrat
- Chad Clifford Democrat
- Monica Duran Democrat
- Meg Froelich Democrat
- Junie Joseph Democrat
- Sheila Lieder Democrat
- Mandy Lindsay Democrat
- Javier Mabrey Democrat
- Karen McCormick Democrat
- Kenny Nguyen Democrat
- Emily Sirota Democrat
- Lesley Smith Democrat
- Brianna Titone Democrat
- Steven Woodrow Democrat
- Yara Zokaie Democrat
- Jamie Jackson Democrat
- Jennifer Bacon Democrat
- Jacque Phillips Democrat
Not signed on (80)
80 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 80 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 15 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Nay |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Nay |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Nay |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Nay |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Nay |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Nay |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Garcia Sander | — | Nay |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Garcia Sander | — | Nay |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Garcia Sander | — | Nay |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Nay |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 46% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Nay |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Nay |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Nay |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Nay |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Nay |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1054 do?
- Section 1 of the bill requires an employer to ensure the employer's workplace is free from recognized hazards, as interpreted consistent with the federal occupational safety and health administration's interpretation of the general duty clause of the 'Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970' (OSH Act) as of September 1, 2025. Additionally, employers have the general duty to:Ensure that each workplace is constructed, equipped, arranged, operated, and conducted as to provide reasonable and adequate protection to the lives, health, and safety of all individuals employed or working in the workplace; andComply with standards for workplace health and safety adopted by rule by the division of labor standards and statistics in the department of labor and employment (division) attorney general. The bill authorizes the following actions to address workplace health and safety concerns:The attorney general or the division may refer workplace health and safety concerns to relevant state or local authorities;The attorney general, the division, a labor organization, a worker organization, or a person aggrieved by a violation of the bill may file a civil action;For each violation of the bill or of rules adopted pursuant to the bill, a court may order the person an employer that violates the bill or rules to pay statutory damages to a person aggrieved by the violation; andA court may order a person an employer that violates the bill or rules adopted pursuant to the bill to pay a penalty to the attorney general for each violation. The bill creates the workplace health and safety fund (fund) into which penalties collected pursuant to the bill are credited. The money in the fund may be used by the division attorney general for specified purposes. The bill authorizes the division attorney general to adopt rules:To replace any requirement of the OSH Act or the 'Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977' that is repealed or revoked; or amended in any manner that results in the federal protections of workers' rights or worker safety becoming less stringent; and To define standards for workplace health and safety if there is no standard in effect under the OSH Act; andAs necessary to implement the bill. Section 2 authorizes the attorney general to apply to the appropriate district court for an order for specified relief if a person fails to obey an investigative demand, subpoena, warrant, or other investigative process related to worker and employee protection. Sections 2 3 through 8 11 make conforming amendments.(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
- Who sponsors HB 1054?
- HB 1054 is sponsored by K. Wallace, Manny Rutinel (Democrat), Elizabeth Velasco (Democrat), Kyle Brown (Democrat), Sean Camacho (Democrat), Chad Clifford (Democrat), Monica Duran (Democrat), Meg Froelich (Democrat), Junie Joseph (Democrat), Sheila Lieder (Democrat), Mandy Lindsay (Democrat), Javier Mabrey (Democrat), Karen McCormick (Democrat), Kenny Nguyen (Democrat), Emily Sirota (Democrat), Lesley Smith (Democrat), Brianna Titone (Democrat), Steven Woodrow (Democrat), Yara Zokaie (Democrat), Jamie Jackson (Democrat), Jennifer Bacon (Democrat), and Jacque Phillips (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1054?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 14, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 1054?
- Track HB 1054 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1054
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1054
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →