Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 5 R · 4 D cosponsors

SB 6 — Parity for Non-Opioid Pain Management Drugs

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on June 03, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 17 sponsors

    4 primary, 13 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (5 R · 4 D) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 10 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

This bill ensures better access to non-opioid pain management drugs through health insurance plans.

The bill mandates that health insurance plans cannot impose stricter conditions on non-opioid pain management drugs than on opioids. It also requires these plans to offer at least one non-opioid option alongside opioids for pain management.

What this means for you
  • Workers: Workers may benefit from increased availability of non-opioid pain management drugs for treating workplace injuries.
  • Consumers: Consumers may find it easier to access non-opioid pain management options under their health insurance plans.
  • Healthcare: Healthcare providers will have expanded treatment options to offer patients dealing with pain.

Summary

The act requires a health insurance carrier that provides prescription drug benefits to require that:The utilization review requirements, including prior authorization and step therapy, for a non-opioid drug prescribed and approved by the federal food and drug administration (FDA) for the treatment or management of chronic or acute pain (non-opioid pain management drug) are no more restrictive than the least restrictive utilization review requirements for opioid drugs prescribed for the treatment or management of chronic or acute pain; andThe cost-sharing, copayment, or deductible for a non-opioid pain management drug is not greater than the cost-sharing, copayment, or deductible for an opioid drug prescribed for the treatment or management of chronic or acute pain.     The act requires each individual and small group health benefit plan issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2027, and each large employer health benefit plan issued or renewed on and after January 1, 2028, to ensure there is at least one non-opioid pain management drug available as a clinically appropriate alternative for an opioid pain management drug. If the division of insurance determines that coverage for a non-opioid pain management drug offered by individual and small group health benefit plans requires state defrayal of the cost of coverage, the requirement to make a non-opioid pain management drug available is inoperative.     The state employee health benefit plan is excluded from the requirements of the act.     The act appropriates $15,415 to the department of regulatory agencies for use by the division of insurance to implement the act.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

97 added · 148 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment added a note indicating that the bill is ready for signatures from legislative officers and the Governor, clarifying the next steps in the legislative process. This change matters because it informs stakeholders that the bill is progressing and highlights the importance of following its status as it moves towards potential enactment. Additionally, it emphasizes that the focus of the bill is on ensuring fair access to non-opioid pain management drugs, which is a crucial issue for patients seeking alternatives to opioids.

→
Previous
Latest
Second Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
NOTE:
26-0027.01 Shelby Ross x4510 SENATE BILL 26-006 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Amabile and Kirkmeyer, Bright, Catlin, Coleman, Cutter, Frizell, Pelton B., Wallace HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Brown and Taggart, Bacon, Boesenecker, Duran, McCormick, Sirota, Smith n d e 2 S R 2 U 3 6 H d y d M Senate Committees House Committees e Health & Human Services Health & Human Services m Appropriations Appropriations A i A BILL FOR AN ACT a 2 S e 2 C ONCERNINGPARITYFORTHEUSEOFNON -OPIOIDPAINMANAGEMENT U d ,5 H 2 a DRUGS , AND , IN CONNECTION THEREWITH , MAKING AN d M d APPROPRIATION .
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
e m A Bill Summary d (Note:
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does d e 6 notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill E a 0 passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that T U , N g 2 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at S d r http://leg.colorado.gov.) e A d The bill requires a health insurance carrier that provides prescription drug benefits to require that:
SENATE BILL 26-006 BY SENATOR(S) Amabile and Kirkmeyer, Bright, Catlin, Cutter, Frizell, Pelton B., Wallace, Coleman;
! The utilization review requirements, including prior g authorization and step therapy, for a non-opioid drug d e 2 prescribed and approved by the federal food and drug E R 0 A n , N 2 1 Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
also REPRESENTATIVE(S) Brown and Taggart, Bacon, Boesenecker, Duran, McCormick, Sirota, Smith.
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
CONCERNING PARITY FOR THE USE OF NON -OPIOID PAIN MANAGEMENT DRUGS , AND , IN CONNECTION THEREWITH , MAKING AN APPROPRIATION .
S e r Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n Ap Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
m A administration (FDA) for the treatment or management of chronic or acute pain (non-opioid pain management drug) are no more restrictive than the least restrictive utilization review requirements for opioid drugs prescribed for the treatment or management of chronic or acute pain;
! There is at least one clinically appropriate non-opioid prescriptiondrugavailableasanalternativeforeachopioid prescription drug;
and ! The cost-sharing, copayment, or deductible for a non-opioid pain management drug is not greater than the cost-sharing, copayment, or deductible for an opioid drug prescribed for the treatment or management of chronic or acute pain.
The bill requires the department of health care policy and financing to ensure that the utilization review requirements, including prior authorization or step therapy, for a non-opioid prescription drug prescribedandapprovedbytheFDAforthe treatmentormanagementof chronic or acute pain are no more restrictive than the least restrictive utilization requirements for opioid drugs prescribed for the treatment or management of chronic or acute pain.
SECTION 1.
SECTION1.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 10-16-145.5, add (2.5) as follows:
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,10-16-145.5,add(2.5) as follows:
Step therapy - prior authorization - prohibited - stagefouradvancedmetastaticcancer-non-opioidpainmanagement drug - definitions.
Step therapy - prior authorization - prohibited - stage four advanced metastatic cancer - non-opioid pain management drug - definitions.
(2.5)(a) OTWITHSTANDINGSECTION 10-16-145ACARRIERTHAT PROVIDES PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFITS SHALL REQUIRE THAT :
(2.5) (a) NOTWITHSTANDING SECTION 10-16-145, A CARRIER THAT PROVIDES PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFITS SHALL REQUIRE THAT :
(I)T HE UTILIZATION REVIEW REQUIREMENTS ,INCLUDING PRIOR AUTHORIZATIONANDSTEPTHERAPY ,FORANON -OPIOIDDRUGPRESCRIBED AND APPROVED BY THE FDA FOR THE TREATMENT OR MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC OR ACUTE PAIN ARE NO MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE UTILIZATION REVIEW REQUIREMENTS FOR OPIOID DRUGS PRESCRIBED FOR THE TREATMENT OR MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC OR -2- 006 ACUTE PAIN ;AND 3 (II) THE COST -SHARING, COPAYMENT , OR DEDUCTIBLE FOR A NON -OPIOIDDRUGPRESCRIBEDFORTHETREATMENTORMANAGEMENTOF CHRONIC OR ACUTE PAIN IS NO GREATER THAN THE COST -SHARING , COPAYMENT ,OR DEDUCTIBLE FOR AN OPIOID DRUG PRESCRIBED FOR THE TREATMENT OR MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC OR ACUTE PAIN .
(I) T HE UTILIZATION REVIEW REQUIREMENTS , INCLUDING PRIOR ________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
(b) (I) XCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (2.5)(b)(IOF THIS SECTION ,ALL INDIVIDUAL AND SMALL GROUP HEALTH BENEFIT PLANS ISSUEDORRENEWEDINTHISSTATEONORAFTER JANUARY 1,2027,SHALL ENSURE THERE IS AT LEAST ONE NON -OPIOID PRESCRIPTION DRUG AVAILABLE AS A CLINICALLY APPROPRIATE ALTERNATIVE FOR AN OPIOID PRESCRIPTION DRUG .
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
(II) UBSECTION (2.5)(b)(IOFTHISSECTIONISINOPERATIVE AND THE STATE SHALL NOT ASSUME AN OBLIGATION FOR THE COVERAGE REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2.5)(b)(OF THIS SECTION IF THE DIVISION DETERMINES THAT THE BENEFIT SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (2.5)(b)(IOF THIS SECTION REQUIRES STATE DEFRAYAL OF THE COST OF COVERAGE PURSUANT TO A PROVISION OF THE FEDERAL ACT ,INCLUDING 42 U.S.C.
AUTHORIZATION AND STEP THERAPY ,FOR A NON-OPIOID DRUG PRESCRIBED AND APPROVED BY THE FDA FOR THE TREATMENT OR MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC OR ACUTE PAIN ARE NO MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE UTILIZATION REVIEW REQUIREMENTS FOR OPIOID DRUGS PRESCRIBED FOR THE TREATMENT OR MANAGEMENT OFCHRONIC OR ACUTE PAIN;AND (II) THE COST -SHARING ,COPAYMENT , OR DEDUCTIBLE FOR A NON -OPIOID DRUG PRESCRIBED FOR THE TREATMENT OR MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC OR ACUTE PAIN IS NO GREATER THAN THE COST -SHARING , COPAYMENT ,OR DEDUCTIBLE FOR AN OPIOID DRUG PRESCRIBED FOR THE TREATMENT OR MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC OR ACUTE PAIN .
(b) (I) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (2.5)(b)(IIOF THIS SECTION,ALLINDIVIDUALANDSMALLGROUPHEALTHBENEFITPLANSISSUED OR RENEWED IN THIS STATE ON OR AFTERJANUARY 1,2027, SHALL ENSURE THERE IS AT LEAST ONE NON-OPIOID PRESCRIPTION DRUG AVAILABLE AS A CLINICALLYAPPROPRIATEALTERNATIVEFORANOPIOIDPRESCRIPTIONDRUG .
(II) SUBSECTION (2.5)(b)(IOF THIS SECTION IS INOPERATIVE AND THE STATE SHALL NOT ASSUME AN OBLIGATION FOR THE COVERAGE REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2.5)(b)(IOF THIS SECTION IF THE DIVISION DETERMINES THAT THE BENEFIT SPECIFIED IN SUBSECTION (2.5)(b)(IOF THIS SECTION REQUIRES STATE DEFRAYAL OF THE COST OF COVERAGE PURSUANT TO A PROVISION OFTHE FEDERALACT ,INCLUDING 42 U.S.C.
18031 (d)(3)(BOR A SUCCESSOR PROVISION,AND THE IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OR THE STATE IS OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO DEFRAY THE COST OF COVERAGE REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2.5)(b)(IOF THIS SECTIO.
18031 (d)(3)(B) OR A SUCCESSOR PROVISION , AND THE IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OR THE STATE IS OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO DEFRAY THE COST OF COVERAGE REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2.5)(b)(IOF THIS SECTIO.
(III) ALL LARGE EMPLOYER HEALTH BENEFIT PLANS ISSUED OR RENEWED IN THISSTATE ON AND AFTER JANUARY 1,2028, SHALLENSURE THEREISATLEASTONE NON -OPIOIDPRESCRIPTIONDRUGAVAILABLEASA CLINICALLY APPROPRIATE ALTERNATIVE FOR AN OPIOID PRESCRIPTION -3- 006 DRUG .
(III) ALL LARGE EMPLOYER HEALTH BENEFIT PLANS ISSUED OR RENEWED IN THIS STATE ON AND AFTER JANUARY 1, 2028SHALL ENSURE THERE IS AT LEAST ONE NON-OPIOID PRESCRIPTION DRUG AVAILABLE AS A CLINICALLYAPPROPRIATEALTERNATIVEFORANOPIOIDPRESCRIPTIONDRUG .
(IV) THECOVERAGEREQUIREDBYTHISSUBSECTION (2.5MAYBE OFFERED THROUGH A HIGH DEDUCTIBLE PLAN THAT WOULD QUALIFY FOR A HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT PURSUANT TO 26 U.S.C.SEC.
(IV) T HE COVERAGE REQUIRED BY THIS SUBSECTION (2.5)MAY BE OFFERED THROUGH A HIGH DEDUCTIBLE PLAN THAT WOULD QUALIFY FOR A HEALTHSAVINGSACCOUNTPURSUANTTO 26U.S.C.SEC .223;EXCEPTTHAT ACARRIERMAYAPPLYDEDUCTIBLEAMOUNTSFORTHEREQUIREDCOVERAGE IF IT IS NOT CONSIDERED BY THE U NITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-006 TREASURY TO BE PREVENTIVE OR TO HAVE AN ACCEPTABLE DEDUCTIBLE .
223EXCEPT THAT A CARRIER MAY APPLY DEDUCTIBLE AMOUNTS FOR THE REQUIRED COVERAGEIFITISNOTCONSIDEREDBYTHE U NITEDSTATESDEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY TO BE PREVENTIVE OR TO HAVE AN ACCEPTABLE DEDUCTIBLE .
(c) T HIS SUBSECTION (2.5)DOES NOT APPLY TO A GROUP BENEFIT PLANISSUEDPURSUANTTOTHE "STATE E MPLOYEE G ROUP B ENEFITSA CT", PART 6 OF ARTICLE50 OF TITLE24.
(c) THIS SUBSECTIO(2.5)DOES NOT APPLY TO A GROUP BENEFIT PLAN ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE "STATE E MPLOYEE G ROUP BENEFITS A CT",PART6 OF ARTICLE50OF TITLE24.
For the 2026-27 state fiscal year, $15,415 is appropriated to the department of regulatoryagencies for use by the division of insurance.
For the 2026-27 state fiscal year, $15,415isappropriatedtothedepartmentof regulatoryagenciesforuseby the division of insurance.
This appropriation is from the division of insurance cash fund created in section 10-1-103 (3)(a)(I), C.R.S., and is based on an assumption that the division will require an additional 0.2 FTE.
This appropriation is from the division of insurance cash fund created in section 10-1-103 (3)(a)(I), C.R.S., and is basedonanassumptionthatthedivisionwillrequireanadditional0.2FTE.
To implement this act, the division may use this appropriation for personal services.
To implement this act, the division mayuse this appropriation for personal services.
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiodafterfinaladjournmentofthegeneralassembly(August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-dayperiod after final adjournment of the general assembly(August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);
except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in -4- 006 November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
except that, if a referendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3)ofarticleVofthestate constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approvedbythepeopleatthegeneralelectiontobeheldinNovember2026 PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-006 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
-5- 006
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-006
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the President of the Senate

  3. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass

  6. House Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor

  7. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee

  8. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - No Amendments

  9. House Second Reading Special Order - Lost with Amendments - Committee

  10. House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

  11. House Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Unamended to Appropriations

  12. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  13. Introduced In House - Assigned to Health & Human Services

  14. Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  15. Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee

  16. Senate Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Amended to Appropriations

  17. Senate Committee on Health & Human Services Witness Testimony and/or Committee Discussion Only

  18. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Health & Human Services

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 84 not signed on · 12 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (13)

Not signed on (84)

84 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 84 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

CONCUR

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 21000
Republican 9001
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 35001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Not Voting
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea
Marc Catlin Republican Yea
Mark Baisley Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

REPASS

Passed 29 Yea · 6 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 18300
Republican 6301
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 29601
% of votes cast 81%17%0%3%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Nay
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Nay
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Nay
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Nay
Larry Liston Republican Not Voting
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Nay
Marc Catlin Republican Yea
Mark Baisley Republican Nay
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 8000
Unaffiliated 0100
Republican 2000
Total 10100
% of votes cast 91%9%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Garcia Sander — Nay
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Emily Sirota Democrat Yea
Junie Joseph Democrat Yea
Karen McCormick Democrat Yea
Kyle Brown Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Rick Taggart Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0500
Democrat 8000
Total 8500
% of votes cast 62%38%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Eliza Hamrick Democrat Yea
Gretchen Rydin Democrat Yea
Karen McCormick Democrat Yea
Katie Stewart Democrat Yea
Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat Yea
Lisa Feret Democrat Yea
Regina English Democrat Yea
Sheila Lieder Democrat Yea
Brandi Bradley Republican Nay
Carlos Barron Republican Nay
Dan Woog Republican Nay
Dusty Johnson Republican Nay
Mary Bradfield Republican Nay

Official roll call →

BILL

Passed 30 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 18300
Republican 8200
Unaffiliated 4001
Total 30501
% of votes cast 83%14%0%3%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Not Voting
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Nay
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Nay
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Nay
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Nay
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Nay
Marc Catlin Republican Yea
Mark Baisley Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 6 do?
The act requires a health insurance carrier that provides prescription drug benefits to require that:The utilization review requirements, including prior authorization and step therapy, for a non-opioid drug prescribed and approved by the federal food and drug administration (FDA) for the treatment or management of chronic or acute pain (non-opioid pain management drug) are no more restrictive than the least restrictive utilization review requirements for opioid drugs prescribed for the treatment or management of chronic or acute pain; andThe cost-sharing, copayment, or deductible for a non-opioid pain management drug is not greater than the cost-sharing, copayment, or deductible for an opioid drug prescribed for the treatment or management of chronic or acute pain.     The act requires each individual and small group health benefit plan issued or renewed on or after January 1, 2027, and each large employer health benefit plan issued or renewed on and after January 1, 2028, to ensure there is at least one non-opioid pain management drug available as a clinically appropriate alternative for an opioid pain management drug. If the division of insurance determines that coverage for a non-opioid pain management drug offered by individual and small group health benefit plans requires state defrayal of the cost of coverage, the requirement to make a non-opioid pain management drug available is inoperative.     The state employee health benefit plan is excluded from the requirements of the act.     The act appropriates $15,415 to the department of regulatory agencies for use by the division of insurance to implement the act.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors SB 6?
SB 6 is sponsored by L. Smith, E. Sirota, K. McCormick, M. Duran, A. Boesenecker, J. Bacon, R. Taggart, K. Brown, Scott Bright (Republican), James Coleman (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), Lisa Frizell (Republican), Katie Wallace (Democrat), Barbara Kirkmeyer (Republican), Judy Amabile (Democrat), Marc Catlin (Republican), and Byron Pelton (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 6?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 6?
Track SB 6 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 6

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 6

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →