Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted 15 D cosponsors

SB 4 — Expand List of Petitioners for Protection Order

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on April 06, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 66% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 43 sponsors

    4 primary, 39 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (15 D).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    5 passed, 3 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

The act adds a co-responder who is part of a co-responder community response to the list of community members who may petition the court for an extreme risk protection order. Health-care facilities, behavioral health treatment facilities, school districts, the state charter school institute, K-12 charter schools, private schools, and institutions of higher education are established as institutional petitioners that may petition a court for an extreme risk protection order.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

108 added · 117 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment clarifies the definition of who can request a protection order by adding that co-responders, as part of community response teams, may also be included if they interacted with the respondent or their child within six months before the request. It introduces the term "institutional petitioner" to define entities, like school districts and charter schools, that employ or contract with community members to initiate this process. This matters because it expands the range of individuals and entities that can help initiate protection orders, which may enhance crisis response efforts.

→
Previous
Latest
NOTE:
This bill has been prepared for the signatures of the appropriate legislative officers and the Governor.
To determine whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
CONCERNING WHO MAY PETITION A COURT FOR AN EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDER .
CONCERNING WHO MAY PETITION A COURT FOR AN EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDER.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
Be it enacted by the GeneralAssembly ofthe State ofColorado:
As used in this article 14.5, unless the context otherwise clearly requires:
As used in this article 14.5, unless the context otherwise clearly reqmres:
________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletionsfrom existing law andsuch material is notpart of the act.
(a) Alicensedhealth-careprofessionalormentalhealthprofessional who, through a direct professional relationship, provided care to the respondentortherespondent'schildwithinsixmonthsbeforerequestingthe protection order;
(a) A licensed health-careprofessional or mental healthprofessional who, through a direct professional relationship, provided care to the respondent or the respondent's child within six months before requesting the protection order;
(c) A CO-RESPONDERWHOISPARTOFACO RESPONDERCOMMUNITY RESPONSE , AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-32-3501 (8)(d), WHO , IN THEIR CAPACITY AS A CO -RESPONDER ,OR A COMMUNITY MEMBER ,AS DEFINED IN THIS SECTION , WHO , AS PART OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OR EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM , PROVIDES ON -SITE CRISIS ASSESSMENT , DE-ESCALATION ,OR INTERVENTION SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS IN CRISIS , WHO INTERACTED WITH THE RESPONDENT OR THE RESPONDENT S CHILD WITHINSIXMONTHSBEFOREREQUESTINGTHEPROTECTIONORDERBUTWHO IS NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHO RESPONDED TO A BEHAVIORAL HEALTH -RELATED CALL INVOLVING THE RESPONDENT .
OR (c) A CO-RESPONDERWHOISPARTOFA CO-RESPONDERCOMMUNITY RESPONSE, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-32-3501 (8)(d), WHO, IN THEIR CAPACITY AS A CO-RESPONDER, OR A COMMUNITY MEMBER, AS DEFINED IN THIS SECTION, WHO, AS PART OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OR EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM, PROVIDES ON-SITE CRISIS ASSESSMENT, DE-ESCALATION, OR INTERVENTION SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS IN CRISIS, WHO INTERACTED WITH THE RESPONDENT OR THE RESPONDENT'S CHILD WITHIN SIX MONTHS BEFOREREQUESTING THE PROTECTION ORDERBUT WHO IS NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHO RESPONDED TO A BEHAVIORAL HEALTH-RELATED CALL INVOLVING THE RESPONDENT.
or a faculty member at an institution of higher education,NCLUDING A COMMUNITY COLLEGE , A LOCAL DISTRICT COLLEGE ,OR AN AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE .
or a faculty member at an institution o f higher education, INCLUDING A COMMUNITY COLLEGE, A LOCAL DISTRICT COLLEGE, OR AN AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE.
(6.5) "ISTITUTIONALPETITIONER "MEANSANENTITYTHATEMPLOYS OR CONTRACTS WITH A COMMUNITY MEMBER AS DEFINED IN THIS SECTION , INCLUDING ,BUT NOT LIMITED TO :
(6.5) "INSTITUTIONALPETITIONER" MEANSANENTITYTHATEMPLOYS OR CONTRACTS WITH A COMMUNITY MEMBER AS DEFINED IN THIS SECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
(a) A SCHOOL DISTRICT ;
(a) A SCHOOL DISTRICT;
(b) A PRIVATE SCHOOL ;
(b) A PRIVATE SCHOOL;
(c) T HE STATE CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE CREATED IN SECTION 22-30.5-503;
(c) THE STATE CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE CREATED IN SECTION 22-30.5-503;
(d) A N INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CHARTER SCHOOL OR INSTITUTE CHARTER SCHOOL ;
(d) AN INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT CHARTER SCHOOL OR INSTITUTE CHARTER SCHOOL;
PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-004 (e) A N INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION , INCLUDING A COMMUNITYCOLLEGE ,ALOCALDISTRICTCOLLEGE ,ORANAREATECHNICAL COLLEGE ;
PAGE 2-SENATE B IL L 26-004 (e) AN INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION, INCLUDING A COMMUNITYCOLLEGE,ALOCALDISTRICTCOLLEGE,ORANAREATECHNICAL COLLEGE;
(f) A HOSPITAL OR HEALTH -CARE FACILITY LICENSED IN ACCORDANCEWITHTHEREQUIREMENTSOFPART 1OFARTICLE 3OFTITLE 25;
(f) A HOSPITAL OR HEALTH-CARE FACILITY LICENSED IN ACCORDANCEWITHTHEREQUIREMENTSOFPART1OFARTICLE3OFTITLE25;
OR (g) A BEHAVIORAL HEALTH OR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER TREATMENT FACILITY ,BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ENTITIES ,OR OTHER FACILITY WHERE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CRISIS SERVICES ARE OFFERED .
OR (g) A BEHAVIORAL HEALTH OR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER TREATMENTFACILITY, BEHAVIORALHEALTHENTITIES, OROTHERFACILITY WHEREBEHAVIORALHEALTHCRISISSERVICESAREOFFERED.
(11) "Respondent" means the person, INCLUDING A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OLD who is identified as the respondent in a petition filed pursuant to this article 14.5.
(11) "Respondent" means the person, INCLUDINGAPERSONUNDER EIGHTEENYEARSOLDwho is identified as the respondent in apetition filed pursuant to this article 14.5.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 13-14.5-103, amend (1)(a) and (1)(b) as follows:
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 13-14.5-103, amend (l)(a) and (l)(b) as follows:
(1) (a) A family or household member of the respondent, a communitymember, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER , or a law enforcement officer or agency may request a temporary extreme risk protection order withoutnoticetotherespondentbyincludinginthepetitionfortheextreme risk protection order an affidavit, signed under oath and penaltyof perjury, supporting the issuance of a temporary extreme risk protection order that sets forth the facts tending to establish the grounds of the petition or the reasonforbelievingtheyexistand,ifthepetitionerisafamilyorhousehold member or community member, attesting that the petitioner is a family or household member or communitymember.
(1) (a) A family or household member of the respondent, a community member, ANINSTITUTIONALPETITIONER, or a law enforcement officer or agency may request a temporary extreme risk protection order withoutnoticeto the respondent by including inthe petition for the extreme risk protection order an affidavit, signed under oath and penalty ofperjury, supporting the issuance of a temporary extreme risk protection order that sets forth the facts tending to establish the grounds of the petition or the reason for believingthey exist and, ifthepetitioneris afamily orhousehold member or community member, attesting that the petitioner is a family or household member or community member.
The petition must complywith the requirements of section 13-14.5-104 (3).
The petition must comply with the requirements of section 13-14.5-104 (3).
If the petitioner is a law enforcement officer or law enforcement agency, AND IF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY HAS PROBABLE CAUSETOBELIEVETHERESPONDENTHASFIREARMSWITHINTHEIRCUSTODY , CONTROL ,OR POSSESSION, the law enforcement officer or law enforcement agency shall concurrently file a sworn affidavit for aRT TO ISSUE A search warrant pursuant to section 16-3-301.5 to search for anyfirearms in the possession,CUSTODY , or control of the respondent at a location or locations to be named in the warrant.
If the petitioner is a law enforcement officer or law enforcement agency, AND IF THE LA w ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OR LAWENFORCEMENT AGENCY HAS PROBABLE CAUSETOBELIEVETHERESPONDENTHASFIREARMSWITHINTHEIRCUSTODY, CONTROL,ORPOSSESSION, the law enforcement officer or law enforcement agency shall concurrently file a sworn affidavit for a COURTTOISSUE A search warrant pursuant to section 16-3-301.5 to search for any firearms in the possession, CUSTODY, or control of the respondent at a location or locations to be named in the warrant.
If a petition filed pursuant to section PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-004 27-65-106 is also filed against the respondent, a court of competent jurisdiction may hear that petition at the same time as the hearing for a temporary extreme risk protection order or the hearing for a continuing extreme risk protection order.
Ifa petition filed pursuant to section PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-004 27-65-106 is also filed against the respondent, a court of competent jurisdiction may hear that petition at the same time as the hearing for a temporary extreme risk protection order or the hearing for a continuing extreme risk protection order.
(b) Notwithstandinganyprovisionoflawtothecontrary,alicensed health-careprofessionalormentalhealthprofessional COMMUNITYMEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER authorized to file a petition for a temporary extreme risk protection order, upon filing the petition for a temporary extreme risk protection order, is authorized to disclose protected health information of the respondent as necessary for the full investigation and disposition of the request for a temporary extreme risk protection order.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision oflaw to the contrary, a licensed health-eateptofessionalot mentalhealthptofessional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER authorized to file a petition for a temporary extreme risk protection order, upon filing the petition for a temporary extreme risk protection order, is authorized to disclose protected health information of the respondent as necessary for the full investigation and disposition of the request for a temporary extreme risk protection order.
When disclosing protected health information, the licensed health-care professional or mental health professional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONALPETITIONER shallmakereasonableeffortstolimitprotected healthinformationtotheminimumnecessarytoaccomplishthefilingofthe petition.Uponreceiptofapetitionbyalicensedhealth-careprofessionalor mental health professional, COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER ,andforgoodcauseshown,thecourtmayissueorderstoobtain anyrecordsordocumentsrelatingtodiagnosis,prognosis,ortreatment,and clinicalrecords,oftherespondentasnecessaryforthefullinvestigationand disposition of the petition for a temporary extreme risk protection order.
When disclosing protected health information, the licensed health-care professional ot mental health professional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER shall make reasonable efforts to limitprotected health informationto the minimum necessary to accomplishthe filing ofthe petition.
When protected health information is disclosed or when the court receives any records or documents related to diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment or clinical records, the court shall order that the parties are prohibited from using or disclosing the protected health information for any purpose other than the proceedings for a petition for a temporaryextreme risk protection orderandshallorderthereturntothecoveredentityordestroytheprotected health information, includingallcopiesmade,attheend of the litigation or proceeding.
Upon receipt ofapetition by a licensedhealth-careprofessional ot mental health professional, COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, and for good cause shown, the courtmay issue ordersto obtain any records ordocuments relatingtodiagnosis, prognosis, ortreatment, and clinical records, oftherespondentas necessaryforthe full investigation and disposition of the petition for a temporary extreme risk protection order.
When protected health information is disclosed or when the court receives any records or documents related to diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment or clinical records, the court shall order that the parties are prohibited from using or disclosing the protected health information for any purpose other than the proceedings for a petition for a temporary extreme risk protection orderandshall orderthe returntothe coveredentityordestroy theprotected health information, including all copies made, at the end ofthe litigation or proceeding.
The decision of a licensedhealth-careprofessionalormentalhealthprofessional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER to disclose or not to disclose recordsordocumentsrelatingtothediagnosis,prognosis,ortreatment,and clinical records of a respondent, when made reasonably and in good faith, shall not be the basis for anycivil, administrative, or criminal liabilitywith respect to the licensed health-care professional or licensed mental health professional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER .
The decision of a licensedhealth-cateptofessional 01 mental healthptofessional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER to disclose or not to disclose records ordocuments relating to the diagnosis, prognosis, ortreatment, and clinical records ofa respondent, when made reasonably and in good faith, shall not be the basis for any civil, administrative, or criminal liability with respect to the licensed health-eate professional ot licensed mental health professional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 13-14.5-104, amend PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-004 (1)(a) and (1)(b) as follows:
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 13-14.5-104, amend PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-004 (l)(a) and (l)(b) as follows:
(1) (a) A petition for an extreme risk protection order may be filed byafamilyorhouseholdmemberoftherespondent,acommunitymember, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER , or a law enforcement officer or agency.
(1) (a) A petition for an extreme risk protection order may be filed by a family orhousehold member ofthe respondent, a community member, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, or a law enforcement officer or agency.
If thepetitionisfiled bya law enforcement officer oragency,acountyorcity attorney shall represent the officer or agency in any judicial proceeding upon request.
If the petition is filed by a law enforcement officer or agency, a county or city attorney shall represent the officer or agency in any judicial proceeding upon request.
If the petition is filed by a family or household member or community member, the petitioner, to the best of the petitioner's ability, shall notify the law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction where the respondentresidesofthepetitionandthehearingdatewithenoughadvance noticetoallowforparticipationorattendance.Uponthefilingofapetition, thecourtshallappointanattorneytorepresenttherespondent,andthecourt shall include the appointment in the notice of hearing provided to the respondent pursuant to section 13-14.5-105 (1)(a).
If the petition is filed by a family or household member or community member, the petitioner, to the best of the petitioner's ability, shall notify the law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction where the respondentresides ofthepetition and the hearingdate withenough advance notice to allow for participation or attendance.
Upon the filing ofapetition, the courtshall appointan attorney to represent the respondent, and the court shall include the appointment in the notice of hearing provided to the respondent pursuant to section 13-14.5-105 (l)(a).
(b) Notwithstandinganyprovisionoflawtothecontrary,alicensed health-care professional, or mental health professional, COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER authorized to file a petition for an extreme risk protection order, upon filing the petition for an extreme risk protection order, is authorized to disclose protected health information of the respondent as necessaryfor the full investigation and disposition of the petition for an extreme risk protection order.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision oflaw to the contrary, a licensed health-careprofessionalor mental healthprofessional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONEK-autlrorized to fil~nr petitfon for an-extreme risk protection order, upon filing the petition for an extreme risk protection order, is authorized to disclose protected health information of the respondent as necessary for the full investigation and disposition of the petition for an extreme risk protection order.
When disclosing protected health information, the licensed health-care professional, or mental health professional, COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER shall make reasonable efforts to limit protected health information to the minimumnecessarytoaccomplishthefilingoftherequest.Uponreceiptof a petition by a licensed health-care professional, or mental health professional,COMMUNITYMEMBEROR INSTITUTIONALPETITIONER , and for good cause shown, the court may issue orders to obtain any records or documents relating to diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment, and clinical records of the respondent as necessary for the full investigation and disposition of the petition for an extreme risk protection order.
When disclosing protected health information, the licensed health-care professional or mental health professional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER shall make reasonable efforts to limit protected health information to the minimum necessary to accomplishthe filing ofthe request.
Upon receiptof a petition by a licensed health-care professional or mental health professional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, and for good cause shown, the court may issue orders to obtain any records or documents relating to diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment, and clinical records of the respondent as necessary for the full investigation and disposition of the petition for an extreme risk protection order.
The decision of a licensed health-care professional, or mental health professional, COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER to disclose or not to disclose records or documents relating to the diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment, and clinical records of a respondent, when made reasonablyand ingoodfaith,mustnotbethebasisforanycivil,administrative,orcriminal liability with respect to the licensed health-care professional, or mental health professional,COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER .
The decision of a licensedhealth-eateptofessional ot mental healthptofessional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER to disclose or not to disclose records or documents relating to the diagnosis, prognosis, ortreatment, and clinical records of a respondent, when made reasonably and in good faith, must not be the basis for any civil, administrative, or criminal liability with respecttothelicensedhealth-eateptofessional ot mentalhealthptofessional COMMUNITY MEMBER OR INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER.
(b) A petitioner, a family or household member of a respondent, a communitymember, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER , or a law enforcement officer or agency may, by motion, request a renewal of an extreme risk protection order at any time within sixty-three calendar days before the expiration of the order.
(b) A petitioner, a family or household member ofa respondent, a community member, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, or a law enforcement officer or agency may, by motion, request a renewal of an extreme risk protection order at any time within sixty-three calendar days before the expiration ofthe order.
Show all 46 changed rows (6 more)
Previous
Latest
(1) Exceptasprovidedinsection13-14.5-111,thisarticle14.5does not impose criminal, administrative, or civil liability on any person, including a community member, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER , or entity foractsoromissionsmadeingoodfaithrelatedtoobtaininganextremerisk protectionorderoratemporaryextremeriskprotectionorder,includingbut not limited to reporting, declining to report, investigating, declining to investigate,filing,ordecliningtofileapetitionpursuanttothisarticle14.5.
(1) Except as provided in section 13-14.5-111, this article 14.5 does not impose criminal, administrative, or civil liability on any person, including a community member, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, or entity for acts oromissionsmade ingood faith relatedto obtaining an extremerisk protection orderoratemporary extremeriskprotection order, includingbut not limited to reporting, declining to report, investigating, declining to investigate, filing, ordeclining to file apetitionpursuantto this article 14.5.
(4) Thisarticle14.5doesnotrequireafamilyorhouseholdmember oftherespondent,acommunitymember, ANINSTITUTIONALPETITIONER ,or a law enforcement officer or agency to file a petition for a temporary emergency extreme risk protection order or petition for an extreme risk protection order.
(4) This article 14.5 does not require afamily orhousehold member ofthe respondent, acommunitymember, AN INSTITUTIONAL PETITIONER, or a law enforcement officer or agency to file a petition for a temporary emergency extreme risk protection order or petition for an extreme risk protection order.
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for PAGE 7-SENATE BILL 26-004 the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation ofthe public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for PAGE 7-SENATE BILL 26-004 the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES sther van Mourik ~ R e i l l y SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED uh YY\(H'\0Arv;\ ~t'2-cr2Jo "-\I\:OOAl'r) (Date and Time) Jare G THE S ATE O OLORADO PAGE 8-SENATE BILL 26-004
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 8-SENATE BILL 26-004
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Sent to the Governor

  3. Signed by the President of the Senate

  4. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  5. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments

  7. House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  8. House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole

  9. Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs

  10. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  11. Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  12. Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 02/02/2026 - No Amendments

  13. Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole

  14. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to State, Veterans, & Military Affairs

Sponsors

  • Y. Zokaie · Cosponsor
  • S. Woodrow · Cosponsor
  • B. Titone · Cosponsor
  • T. Story · Cosponsor
  • R. Stewart · Cosponsor
  • L. Smith · Cosponsor
  • E. Sirota · Cosponsor
  • G. Rydin · Cosponsor
  • M. Rutinel · Cosponsor
  • A. Paschal · Cosponsor
  • K. Nguyen · Cosponsor
  • K. McCormick · Cosponsor
  • J. McCluskie · Cosponsor
  • M. Lindsay · Cosponsor
  • J. Joseph · Cosponsor
  • J. Jackson · Cosponsor
  • E. Hamrick · Cosponsor
  • L. Gilchrist · Cosponsor
  • L. García · Cosponsor
  • C. Espenoza · Cosponsor
  • M. Duran · Cosponsor
  • S. Camacho · Cosponsor
  • K. Brown · Cosponsor
  • A. Boesenecker · Cosponsor
  • J. Bacon · Cosponsor
  • J. Willford · Primary
  • M. Froelich · Primary
  • Julie Gonzales · Primary
  • Tom Sullivan · Primary
  • Judy Amabile · Cosponsor
  • Matt Ball · Cosponsor
  • James Coleman · Cosponsor
  • Jessie Danielson · Cosponsor
  • Iman Jodeh · Cosponsor
  • Cathy Kipp · Cosponsor
  • Chris Kolker · Cosponsor
  • William Lindstedt · Cosponsor
  • Robert Rodriguez · Cosponsor
  • Katie Wallace · Cosponsor
  • Mike Weissman · Cosponsor
  • Tony Exum · Cosponsor
  • Lisa Cutter · Cosponsor
  • Michaelson Jenet · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 39 co-sponsors · 58 not signed on · 62 voted No

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (39)

Not signed on (58)

58 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 58 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

BILL

Passed 39 Yea · 24 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 38201
Republican 01801
Unaffiliated 1400
Total 392402
% of votes cast 60%37%0%3%
How each member voted (65)
Member Party Vote
Gonzalez R. — Nay
Stewart K. — Nay
Stewart R. — Yea
Winter T. — Nay
Garcia Sander — Nay
Alex Valdez Democrat Yea
Amy Paschal Democrat Yea
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Yea
Bob Marshall Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Yea
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Eliza Hamrick Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Yea
Emily Sirota Democrat Yea
Gretchen Rydin Democrat Yea
Jacque Phillips Democrat Yea
Jamie Jackson Democrat Yea
Javier Mabrey Democrat Yea
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Yea
Jenny Willford Democrat Yea
Julie McCluskie Democrat Yea
Junie Joseph Democrat Yea
Karen McCormick Democrat Yea
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Yea
Kyle Brown Democrat Yea
Lesley Smith Democrat Yea
Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat Yea
Lisa Feret Democrat Not Voting
Lorena Garcia Democrat Yea
Lori Goldstein Democrat Yea
Mandy Lindsay Democrat Yea
Manny Rutinel Democrat Yea
Matthew Martinez Democrat Nay
Meg Froelich Democrat Yea
Meghan Lukens Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Monica Duran Democrat Yea
Naquetta Ricks Democrat Yea
Regina English Democrat Yea
Sean Camacho Democrat Yea
Sheila Lieder Democrat Yea
Steven Woodrow Democrat Yea
Tammy Story Democrat Yea
Tisha Mauro Democrat Nay
Yara Zokaie Democrat Yea
Anthony Hartsook Republican Nay
Ava Flanell Republican Nay
Brandi Bradley Republican Nay
Carlos Barron Republican Nay
Chris Richardson Republican Nay
Dan Woog Republican Nay
Dusty Johnson Republican Nay
Jarvis Caldwell Republican Nay
Ken DeGraaf Republican Not Voting
Larry Don Suckla Republican Nay
Mary Bradfield Republican Nay
Matt Soper Republican Nay
Max Brooks Republican Nay
Rebecca Keltie Republican Nay
Rick Taggart Republican Nay
Ron Weinberg Republican Nay
Scott Bottoms Republican Nay
Scott Slaugh Republican Nay
Stephanie Luck Republican Nay

Official roll call →

AMD (H.001)

Failed 31 Yea · 32 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 103100
Republican 17002
Unaffiliated 4100
Total 313202
% of votes cast 48%49%0%3%
How each member voted (65)
Member Party Vote
Gonzalez R. — Yea
Stewart K. — Yea
Stewart R. — Nay
Winter T. — Yea
Garcia Sander — Yea
Alex Valdez Democrat Nay
Amy Paschal Democrat Yea
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Nay
Bob Marshall Democrat Yea
Brianna Titone Democrat Nay
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Nay
Chad Clifford Democrat Nay
Eliza Hamrick Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Nay
Emily Sirota Democrat Nay
Gretchen Rydin Democrat Yea
Jacque Phillips Democrat Nay
Jamie Jackson Democrat Nay
Javier Mabrey Democrat Nay
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Nay
Jenny Willford Democrat Nay
Julie McCluskie Democrat Nay
Junie Joseph Democrat Nay
Karen McCormick Democrat Nay
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Nay
Kyle Brown Democrat Nay
Lesley Smith Democrat Nay
Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat Nay
Lisa Feret Democrat Nay
Lorena Garcia Democrat Nay
Lori Goldstein Democrat Nay
Mandy Lindsay Democrat Nay
Manny Rutinel Democrat Nay
Matthew Martinez Democrat Yea
Meg Froelich Democrat Nay
Meghan Lukens Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Nay
Monica Duran Democrat Yea
Naquetta Ricks Democrat Nay
Regina English Democrat Yea
Sean Camacho Democrat Nay
Sheila Lieder Democrat Yea
Steven Woodrow Democrat Nay
Tammy Story Democrat Nay
Tisha Mauro Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Nay
Anthony Hartsook Republican Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Not Voting
Brandi Bradley Republican Yea
Carlos Barron Republican Yea
Chris Richardson Republican Yea
Dan Woog Republican Yea
Dusty Johnson Republican Yea
Jarvis Caldwell Republican Yea
Ken DeGraaf Republican Not Voting
Larry Don Suckla Republican Yea
Mary Bradfield Republican Yea
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Max Brooks Republican Yea
Rebecca Keltie Republican Yea
Rick Taggart Republican Yea
Ron Weinberg Republican Yea
Scott Bottoms Republican Yea
Scott Slaugh Republican Yea
Stephanie Luck Republican Yea

Official roll call →

AMD (H.002)

Failed 27 Yea · 36 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 63500
Republican 17002
Unaffiliated 4100
Total 273602
% of votes cast 42%55%0%3%
How each member voted (65)
Member Party Vote
Gonzalez R. — Yea
Stewart K. — Yea
Stewart R. — Nay
Winter T. — Yea
Garcia Sander — Yea
Alex Valdez Democrat Nay
Amy Paschal Democrat Yea
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Nay
Bob Marshall Democrat Nay
Brianna Titone Democrat Nay
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Nay
Chad Clifford Democrat Nay
Eliza Hamrick Democrat Nay
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Nay
Emily Sirota Democrat Nay
Gretchen Rydin Democrat Nay
Jacque Phillips Democrat Nay
Jamie Jackson Democrat Nay
Javier Mabrey Democrat Nay
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Nay
Jenny Willford Democrat Nay
Julie McCluskie Democrat Nay
Junie Joseph Democrat Nay
Karen McCormick Democrat Nay
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Nay
Kyle Brown Democrat Nay
Lesley Smith Democrat Nay
Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat Nay
Lisa Feret Democrat Nay
Lorena Garcia Democrat Nay
Lori Goldstein Democrat Nay
Mandy Lindsay Democrat Nay
Manny Rutinel Democrat Nay
Matthew Martinez Democrat Yea
Meg Froelich Democrat Nay
Meghan Lukens Democrat Nay
Michael Carter Democrat Nay
Monica Duran Democrat Yea
Naquetta Ricks Democrat Nay
Regina English Democrat Yea
Sean Camacho Democrat Nay
Sheila Lieder Democrat Yea
Steven Woodrow Democrat Nay
Tammy Story Democrat Nay
Tisha Mauro Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Nay
Anthony Hartsook Republican Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Not Voting
Brandi Bradley Republican Yea
Carlos Barron Republican Yea
Chris Richardson Republican Yea
Dan Woog Republican Yea
Dusty Johnson Republican Yea
Jarvis Caldwell Republican Yea
Ken DeGraaf Republican Not Voting
Larry Don Suckla Republican Yea
Mary Bradfield Republican Yea
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Max Brooks Republican Yea
Rebecca Keltie Republican Yea
Rick Taggart Republican Yea
Ron Weinberg Republican Yea
Scott Bottoms Republican Yea
Scott Slaugh Republican Yea
Stephanie Luck Republican Yea

Official roll call →

AMD (H.003)

Failed 22 Yea · 40 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 23900
Republican 16003
Unaffiliated 4100
Total 224003
% of votes cast 34%62%0%5%
How each member voted (65)
Member Party Vote
Gonzalez R. — Yea
Stewart K. — Yea
Stewart R. — Nay
Winter T. — Yea
Garcia Sander — Yea
Alex Valdez Democrat Nay
Amy Paschal Democrat Nay
Andrew Boesenecker Democrat Nay
Bob Marshall Democrat Nay
Brianna Titone Democrat Nay
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Nay
Chad Clifford Democrat Nay
Eliza Hamrick Democrat Nay
Elizabeth Velasco Democrat Nay
Emily Sirota Democrat Nay
Gretchen Rydin Democrat Nay
Jacque Phillips Democrat Nay
Jamie Jackson Democrat Nay
Javier Mabrey Democrat Nay
Jennifer Bacon Democrat Nay
Jenny Willford Democrat Nay
Julie McCluskie Democrat Nay
Junie Joseph Democrat Nay
Karen McCormick Democrat Nay
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Nay
Kyle Brown Democrat Nay
Lesley Smith Democrat Nay
Lindsay Gilchrist Democrat Nay
Lisa Feret Democrat Nay
Lorena Garcia Democrat Nay
Lori Goldstein Democrat Nay
Mandy Lindsay Democrat Nay
Manny Rutinel Democrat Nay
Matthew Martinez Democrat Yea
Meg Froelich Democrat Nay
Meghan Lukens Democrat Nay
Michael Carter Democrat Nay
Monica Duran Democrat Nay
Naquetta Ricks Democrat Nay
Regina English Democrat Nay
Sean Camacho Democrat Nay
Sheila Lieder Democrat Nay
Steven Woodrow Democrat Nay
Tammy Story Democrat Nay
Tisha Mauro Democrat Yea
Yara Zokaie Democrat Nay
Anthony Hartsook Republican Yea
Ava Flanell Republican Not Voting
Brandi Bradley Republican Yea
Carlos Barron Republican Yea
Chris Richardson Republican Yea
Dan Woog Republican Yea
Dusty Johnson Republican Yea
Jarvis Caldwell Republican Yea
Ken DeGraaf Republican Not Voting
Larry Don Suckla Republican Yea
Mary Bradfield Republican Yea
Matt Soper Republican Yea
Max Brooks Republican Yea
Rebecca Keltie Republican Yea
Rick Taggart Republican Yea
Ron Weinberg Republican Yea
Scott Bottoms Republican Not Voting
Scott Slaugh Republican Yea
Stephanie Luck Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 0300
Democrat 8000
Total 8300
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Jenny Willford Democrat Yea
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Yea
Lisa Feret Democrat Yea
Meg Froelich Democrat Yea
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Naquetta Ricks Democrat Yea
Brandi Bradley Republican Nay
Scott Bottoms Republican Nay
Stephanie Luck Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 4 do?
The act adds a co-responder who is part of a co-responder community response to the list of community members who may petition the court for an extreme risk protection order. Health-care facilities, behavioral health treatment facilities, school districts, the state charter school institute, K-12 charter schools, private schools, and institutions of higher education are established as institutional petitioners that may petition a court for an extreme risk protection order.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors SB 4?
SB 4 is sponsored by Y. Zokaie, S. Woodrow, B. Titone, T. Story, R. Stewart, L. Smith, E. Sirota, G. Rydin, M. Rutinel, A. Paschal, K. Nguyen, K. McCormick, J. McCluskie, M. Lindsay, J. Joseph, J. Jackson, E. Hamrick, L. Gilchrist, L. García, C. Espenoza, M. Duran, S. Camacho, K. Brown, A. Boesenecker, J. Bacon, J. Willford, M. Froelich, Julie Gonzales (Democrat), Tom Sullivan (Democrat), Judy Amabile (Democrat), Matt Ball (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), Jessie Danielson (Democrat), Iman Jodeh (Democrat), Cathy Kipp (Democrat), Chris Kolker (Democrat), William Lindstedt (Democrat), Robert Rodriguez (Democrat), Katie Wallace (Democrat), Mike Weissman (Democrat), Tony Exum (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), and Michaelson Jenet.
What is the current status of SB 4?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 4?
Track SB 4 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 4

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 4

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →