Colorado 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 13 R · 10 D cosponsors

HB 1023 — Political Party Liability for Accessibility Requirements

Last action — Governor Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on April 27, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 41 sponsors

    5 primary, 36 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (13 R · 10 D) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Under current law, a political party must ensure that any person, upon request, is able to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly with the use of a video conferencing platform or alternative means of participation. The failure of any political party to make a reasonable effort to comply with these accessibility requirements constitutes discrimination on the basis of disability in a place of public accommodation.     The act clarifies that only a person who is otherwise eligible pursuant to statute to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly may request video conferencing or another alternative means of participation. The act also clarifies that a person who is subjected to a violation of a political party's duties regarding these accessibility requirements may file suit only against the central committee of the political party holding the caucus or assembly. An individual, including a member of the central committee of the political party or a volunteer for a political party, may not be held liable for a violation of these accessibility requirements. Upon a finding of a violation of these accessibility requirements, a court may require compliance with the applicable accessibility requirement and either actual monetary damages or a statutory fine of $3,500 for each violation.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

101 added · 144 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill HB 1023 was amended to clarify that political parties in Colorado must provide access to precinct caucuses and party assemblies for individuals with disabilities by allowing participation via video conferencing. This change is important as it ensures that all eligible individuals, including those who may face physical barriers, can fully engage in the political process without facing accessibility issues. By specifying the use of technology, the amendment aims to make political participation more inclusive and equitable.

→
Previous
Latest
Second Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
HOUSE BILL 26-1023 BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Luck and Woodrow, Bottoms, Bradley, Brooks, Caldwell, Clifford, DeGraaf, Duran, Espenoza, Goldstein, Hartsook, Lindsay, Martinez, Phillips, Richardson, Slaugh, Story, Suckla, Taggart, Velasco, Weinberg, Winter T.;
26-0621.01 Rebecca Bayetti x4348 HOUSE BILL 26-1023 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Luck and Woodrow, Bottoms, Bradley, Brooks, Caldwell, Clifford, DeGraaf, Duran, Espenoza, Goldstein, Hartsook, Lindsay, Martinez, Phillips, Richardson, Slaugh, Story, Suckla, Taggart, Velasco, Weinberg, Winter T.
also SENATOR(S) Baisley and Rodriguez, Zamora Wilson, Benavidez, Carson,Cutter,Daugherty,Exum,Frizell,GonzalesJ.,Jodeh,Kipp,Kolker, Marchman, Mullica, Pelton R., Wallace, Coleman.
SENATE SPONSORSHIP BaisleyandRodriguez, ZamoraWilson,Benavidez,Carson,Coleman,Cutter,Daugherty, Exum, Frizell, Gonzales J., Jodeh, Kipp, Kolker, Marchman, Mullica, Pelton R., Wallace e n e 6 E a 0 A U , N g l S d ip House Committees Senate Committees e A State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs State, Veterans, & Military Affairs R r e A BILL FOR AN ACT n 6 m 0 C ONCERNINGCLARIFICATIONOFAPOLITICALPARTY 'SLIABILITYFOR T n , N U 3 CERTAINACCESSIBILITYREQUIREMENTSRELATINGTOBALLOT E i c S a a ACCESS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES .
C ONCERNING CLARIFICATION OF A POLITICAL PARTY 'S LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO BALLOT ACCESS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES .
R M n Bill Summary e (Note:
This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does n 2 notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.Ifthisbill m 2 E n 6 passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that U U 2 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at O i a H a r http://leg.colorado.gov.) R e r F Undercurrentlaw,thegeneralassembly,thesecretaryofstate,and each political party must ensure that it remains an option for a candidate in the state to access the ballot through the caucus process or any future g 6 alternative process that is accessible to persons with disabilities.
A d 0 E e , political party must also ensure that any person, upon request, is able to S R 2 U d r H 2 u Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
e b Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n F Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
e A participateinaprecinctcaucusorapartyassemblywiththeuseofavideo conferencing platform or alternative means of participation.
The failure of any political party to make a reasonable effort to comply with these accessibility requirements constitutes discrimination on the basis of disability in a place of public accommodation.
The bill clarifies that these duties are duties of the state political partyand that a person who is subjected to a violation of a state political party's duties regarding these accessibility requirements may file suit against the state political party.
An individual, including a member of or volunteer for a political party, or a local political party may not be held liable for a violation of the state political party's duties regarding these accessibility requirements.
6 (2) (a) Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, within six months of August 7, 2024, any person WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE INACCORDANCEWITHTHEPROVISIONSOFSECTION 1-3-101,uponrequest, must be able to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly with the use of a video conferencing platform The political party holding the caucus or assembly must allow participation with the use of a video conferencing platform without requiring or requesting an explanation of the need for the use of the video conferencing platform.
(2) (a) Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, within six months of August 7, 2024, any person WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1-3-101, upon request, ________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
It is in a political party's discretion to determine which video conferencing platform will be used for precinct caucuses and partyassemblies so long asthe platformis accessible topersonswithdisabilities.Each political party shall establish policies regarding the procedure and timeline for a person to request to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly with the use of a video conferencing platform.
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
-2- 1023 (b) The requirements of subsection (2)(a) of this section do not apply when a precinct caucus or party assembly occurs in a geographic location that is in an unserved area of the state, as defined in section 40-15-102(32);EXCEPTTHATANYPERSONINSUCHUNSERVEDAREAWHO IS ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1-3-101UPONREQUEST ,MUSTBEABLETOPARTICIPATEINSUCH PRECINCT CAUCUS OR PARTY ASSEMBLY WITH THE USE OF AN ALTERNATIVE TO A VIDEO CONFERENCING PLATFORM , SUCH AS A TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL.
mustbeabletoparticipateinaprecinctcaucus or apartyassemblywiththe useofavideoconferencingplatformThepoliticalpartyholdingthecaucus or assembly must allow participation with the use of a video conferencing platformwithout requiring or requesting an explanation of the need for the use of the video conferencing platform.
T HE ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF PARTICIPATIONUSEDINACCORDANCEWITHTHISSUBSECTION (2)(b)MUST BE ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILIT.ES (c) A political party holding a precinct caucus or party assembly that is exempt pursuant to subsection (2)(b) of this section from the requirementsof subsection(2)(a)of thissectionmustallowparticipation with the use of an alternative to a video conferencing platform, such as a telephone conference call.
It is in a political party's discretion to determine which video conferencing platform will be used for precinct caucuses and party assemblies so long as the platform is accessible to persons with disabilities.
The alternative means of participation used by a political party in accordance with this subsection (2)(c) must be accessible to persons with disabilities.
Each political party shall establish policies regarding the procedure and timeline for a person to request to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly with the use of a video conferencing platform.
(d) A political party may require that a person request to participateinaprecinctcaucusorapartyassemblywiththeuseofavideo conferencingplatform,oranalternativetoavideoconferencingplatform as provided in subsection (2)(c)ECTION (2)(b) of this section, not morethanthirtydaysinadvanceoftheprecinctcaucusorpartyassembly.
(b) The requirements of subsection (2)(a) of this section do not apply when a precinct caucus or party assembly occurs in a geographic location that is in an unserved area of the state, as defined in section 40-15-102 (32);
(3) The failure of any political party to make a reasonable effort to comply with the requirements of this section constitutes discriminationonthebasisof disabilityinviolationofsection24-34-602 SECTION 24-34-601.
EXCEPT THAT ANY PERSON IN SUCH UNSERVED AREA WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1-3-101, UPON REQUEST ,MUST BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN SUCH PRECINCT CAUCUS OR PARTY ASSEMBLY WITH THE USE OFANALTERNATIVE TOAVIDEOCONFERENCINGPLATFORM ,SUCHASATELEPHONECONFERENCE CALL .
Any person who is subjected to a violation of this -3- 1023 sectionisentitledtoseekallreliefprovidedinsection24-34-SECTION 24-34-602 (1.5) ONLY AGAINST THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY HOLDING THE CAUCUS OR ASSEMBLY .
THE ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF PARTICIPATION USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SUBSECTION (2)(b) MUST BE ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES.
N INDIVIDUAL, INCLUDING A MEMBER OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY OR A VOLUNTEER FOR THE POLITICAL PARTY, MAY NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTIO.
(c) Apoliticalpartyholdingaprecinctcaucusorpartyassemblythat is exempt pursuant to subsection (2)(b) of this section from the requirements of subsection (2)(a) of this section must allow participation with the use of an alternative to a video conferencing platform, such as a telephone conference call.
SECTION2.
The alternative means of participation used by apoliticalpartyinaccordancewiththissubsection(2)(c)mustbeaccessible to persons with disabilities.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,24-34-602,add(1.5) as follows:
(d) A political partymayrequire that a person request to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly with the use of a video conferencing platform, or an alternative to a video conferencing platform asprovidedinsubsection(2)(c) SUBSECTION (2)(b)ofthissection,notmore than thirty days in advance of the precinct caucus or party assembly.
(3) The failure of any political party to make a reasonable effort to comply with the requirements of this section constitutes discrimination on PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 26-1023 thebasisofdisabilityinviolationofsection24-34-602SECTION 24-34-601.
Anypersonwhoissubjected to a violation of this section is entitledtoseek all relief provided in section 24-34-602CTION 24-34-602 (1.5)ONLY AGAINST THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY HOLDING THE CAUCUS OR ASSEMBLY .
AN INDIVIDUAL , INCLUDING A MEMBER OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY OR A VOLUNTEER FOR THE POLITICAL PARTY ,MAY NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION .
SECTION 2.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-34-602, add (1.5) as follows:
(1.5) (a) A PERSON AGGRIEVED BY A VIOLATION OF SECTION 1-1-116 MAY BRING AN ACTION IN ANY COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION.
(1.5)(a) APERSONAGGRIEVEDBYAVIOLATIONOFSECTION 1-1-116 MAY BRING AN ACTION IN ANY COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION .
UPON FINDING A VIOLATION OF SECTION 1-1-116,THE PLAINTIFFIS ENTITLED TO A COURT ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE APPLICABLE SECTION AND EITHE:
UPON FINDING A VIOLATION OFSECTION 1-1-116,THE PLAINTIFFIS ENTITLED TO A COURT ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE APPLICABLE SECTION AND EITHER :
(I) THE RECOVERY OF ACTUAL MONETARY DAMAGES ;OR (II) A STATUTORY FINE OF THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ,PAYABLE TO EACH PLAINTIFF FOR EACH VIOLATION.
(I) THE RECOVERY OF ACTUAL MONETARY DAMAGES ;OR (II) A STATUTORY FINE OF THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ,PAYABLE TO EACH PLAINTIFF FOR EACH VIOLATION .
(b) FORACLAIMBROUGHT FORAVIOLATIONOFSECTION 1-1-116, EACH CAUCUS OR ASSEMBLY IS CONSIDEREDASINGLE INCIDENT AND NOT AS SEPARATE VIOLATIONS .
(b) F OR A CLAIM BROUGHT FOR A VIOLATION OF SECTION 1-1-116, EACHCAUCUSORASSEMBLYISCONSIDEREDASINGLEINCIDENTANDNOTAS SEPARATE VIOLATIONS .
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservationofthepublicpeace,health,orsafetyorforappropriationsfor the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
The general assembly finds, determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 26-1023 the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.
-4- 1023
____________________________ ____________________________ Julie McCluskie James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE PRESIDENT OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE ____________________________ ____________________________ Vanessa Reilly Esther van Mourik CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE SECRETARY OF OF REPRESENTATIVES THE SENATE APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 26-1023
View plain text versions (7)

Action History

  1. Governor Signed

  2. Signed by the Speaker of the House

  3. Signed by the President of the Senate

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  6. Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments

  7. Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Refer Unamended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole

  8. Introduced In Senate - Assigned to State, Veterans, & Military Affairs

  9. House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments

  10. House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor

  11. House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments

  12. House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole

  13. Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

5 sponsors · 36 co-sponsors · 60 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (5)

Co-sponsors (36)

Not signed on (60)

60 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 60 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

BILL

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 21000
Republican 10000
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 36000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Gonzales J. — Yea
Pelton B. — Yea
Pelton R. — Yea
President — Yea
Adrienne Benavidez — Yea
Cathy Kipp Democrat Yea
Chris Kolker Democrat Yea
Dylan Roberts Democrat Yea
Iman Jodeh Democrat Yea
James Coleman Democrat Yea
Janice Marchman Democrat Yea
Jeff Bridges Democrat Yea
Jessie Danielson Democrat Yea
Judy Amabile Democrat Yea
Katie Wallace Democrat Yea
Kyle Mullica Democrat Yea
Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Yea
Lisa Cutter Democrat Yea
Marc Snyder Democrat Yea
Matt Ball Democrat Yea
Mike Weissman Democrat Yea
Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Yea
Robert Rodriguez Democrat Yea
Tom Sullivan Democrat Yea
Tony Exum Democrat Yea
William Lindstedt Democrat Yea
Barbara Kirkmeyer Republican Yea
Cleave Simpson Republican Yea
Janice Rich Republican Yea
John Carson Republican Yea
Larry Liston Republican Yea
Lisa Frizell Republican Yea
Lynda Zamora Wilson Republican Yea
Marc Catlin Republican Yea
Mark Baisley Republican Yea
Scott Bright Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 3000
Democrat 7100
Total 10100
% of votes cast 91%9%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Cecelia Espenoza Democrat Yea
Chad Clifford Democrat Yea
Jenny Willford Democrat Yea
Kenny Nguyen Democrat Yea
Lisa Feret Democrat Yea
Meg Froelich Democrat Nay
Michael Carter Democrat Yea
Naquetta Ricks Democrat Yea
Brandi Bradley Republican Yea
Scott Bottoms Republican Yea
Stephanie Luck Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1023 do?
Under current law, a political party must ensure that any person, upon request, is able to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly with the use of a video conferencing platform or alternative means of participation. The failure of any political party to make a reasonable effort to comply with these accessibility requirements constitutes discrimination on the basis of disability in a place of public accommodation.     The act clarifies that only a person who is otherwise eligible pursuant to statute to participate in a precinct caucus or a party assembly may request video conferencing or another alternative means of participation. The act also clarifies that a person who is subjected to a violation of a political party's duties regarding these accessibility requirements may file suit only against the central committee of the political party holding the caucus or assembly. An individual, including a member of the central committee of the political party or a volunteer for a political party, may not be held liable for a violation of these accessibility requirements. Upon a finding of a violation of these accessibility requirements, a court may require compliance with the applicable accessibility requirement and either actual monetary damages or a statutory fine of $3,500 for each violation.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors HB 1023?
HB 1023 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, K. Wallace, R. Pelton, K. Mullica, J. Marchman, C. Kolker, C. Kipp, I. Jodeh, J. Gonzales, L. Frizell, T. Exum, L. Daugherty, L. Cutter, J. Coleman, J. Carson, L. Zamora Wilson, R. Rodriguez, M. Baisley, Stephanie Luck (Republican), Steven Woodrow (Democrat), Brandi Bradley (Republican), Max Brooks (Republican), Jarvis Caldwell (Republican), Chad Clifford (Democrat), Ken DeGraaf (Republican), Cecelia Espenoza (Democrat), Lori Goldstein (Democrat), Anthony Hartsook (Republican), Mandy Lindsay (Democrat), Jacque Phillips (Democrat), Chris Richardson (Republican), Scott Slaugh (Republican), Tammy Story (Democrat), Larry Don Suckla (Republican), Elizabeth Velasco (Democrat), Ron Weinberg (Republican), Ty Winter (Republican), Matthew Martinez (Democrat), Rick Taggart (Republican), Scott Bottoms (Republican), and Monica Duran (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 1023?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 1023?
Track HB 1023 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1023

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1023

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →