Prohibit Lead Generation Legal Marketing
If you work in the legal field, this law limits how marketing for legal services can be conducted.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 174 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 174.
You're tracking SB 174
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 174 — Prohibit Lead Generation Legal Marketing
Last action — Governor Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 21, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on June 03, 2026.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
22 sponsors
4 primary, 18 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (11 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill prohibits deceptive lead generation marketing in legal services.
This legislation defines lead generation marketing for legal services as deceptive and subject to Colorado's consumer protection laws. It restricts who can market legal services and states that violators may face penalties.
What this means for you
- Workers: If you work in the legal field, this law limits how marketing for legal services can be conducted.
Summary
The act establishes that the practice of lead generation marketing for legal services is a deceptive trade practice that is subject to enforcement under the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act'. 'Lead generation legal marketing' is defined in the act as a form of marketing in which a lawyer, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional pays money or other compensation to a third party to receive information about a potential client or case, including the potential client's contact information or information about the potential client's legal issue or case. Unless a person meets certain criteria, the act prohibits a person from paying money or other compensation for lead generation legal marketing services, engaging in the practice of lead generation legal marketing, or selling leads to an attorney, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional. A person may solicit or market for legal services in Colorado only if the person is:Authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado;Working on behalf of a person authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado and that person is clearly identified in any advertisement, marketing materials, information, or resources; orA nonprofit organization that engages in legal services. The act establishes that a person that engages in the practice of lead generation legal marketing may be subject to both civil and criminal penalties.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
180 added · 234 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 174 now includes a statement regarding the process for determining whether the Governor has signed the bill. Additionally, it adds a specific new section to the law that prohibits lead generation marketing for legal services, defining this practice as a deceptive trade. This change is important because it aims to protect consumers from misleading marketing tactics used by some legal service providers, ensuring they receive fair treatment in the marketplace. By explicitly legislating against these practices, the bill enhances accountability within the legal industry.
SecondNOTE: Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
26-1003.01This Christopherbill McMichaelhas x4775been SENATEprepared BILLfor 26-174the SENATEsignatures SPONSORSHIPof Roberts,the Ball,appropriate Benavidez,legislative Bridges,officers Coleman,and Cutter,the Daugherty,Governor. Exum, Kipp, Rodriguez, Snyder, Wallace HOUSE SPONSORSHIP CarterandSoper, Garcia,Clifford,Hamrick,Lindsay,Mabrey,Nguyen,Phillips,Rutinel e n m 6 E n 0 U U , O i y H a a Senate Committees House Committees R M Judiciary Judiciary r d A BILL FOR AN ACT d e 2 C ONCERNING THE PROHIBITION OF LEAD GENERATION MARKETING S a 2 U U 6 FOR LEGAL SERVICES .
HTo gdetermine awhether dthe MGovernor ehas Billsigned Summarythe dbill (Note:or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
ThisSENATE summaryBILL applies26-174 toBY thisSENATOR(S) billRoberts, asBall, introducedBenavidez, andBridges, doesCutter, notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.IfthisbillDaugherty, dExum, passesKipp, thirdRodriguez, readingSnyder, inWallace, theColeman; house of introduction, a bill summary that e 6 m 0 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at T n 2 http://leg.colorado.gov.) N g 0 E i i S e p The bill establishes that the practice of lead generation marketing R A r for legal services is a deceptive trade practice that is subject to 3 enforcement under the "Colorado Consumer Protection Act".
"LeadalsoREPRESENTATIVE(S)CarterandSoper,Garcia,Clifford,Hamrick, generationLindsay, legalMabrey, marketing"Nguyen, isPhillips, definedRutinel. in the bill as a form of marketing in which a lawyer, law firm, or legal paraprofessional pays i a moneyorothercompensationtoathirdpartytoreceiveinformationabout e 2 T d 2 A n 9 E d l Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
DoubleC underliningONCERNING denotesTHE SENATEPROHIBITION amendment.OF LEAD GENERATION MARKETING FOR LEGAL SERVICES .
S d p Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n A Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
m A a potential client or case, including the client's contact information or information about the potential client's legal issue or case.
The bill prohibits an attorney, law firm, or legal paraprofessional frompayingmoneyor other compensation to anyperson engaged inlead generation legal marketing.
The bill prohibits a person from engaging in the practice of lead generation legal marketing.
A person may not solicit or market for legal services in Colorado unless the person is:
! A licensed attorney, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional;
! Working on behalf of a licensed attorney, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional and the attorney, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional is clearly identified in anyadvertisementandmarketingmaterials,information,or resources;
or ! A nonprofit organization that provides legal services.
The bill establishes that a person that engages in the practice of leadgenerationlegalmarketingmaybe subject tobothcivilandcriminal penalties.
In Colorado Revised Statutes, 6-1-105, add (1)(qqqq)(1)(tttt) as follows:
(qqqq)(tttt) VVIOLATES IOLATES SECTION 6-1-741.
________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
(1) TTHE HE GENERAL ASSEMBLY FINDS AND DECLARES THAT :
(a) CONSISTENTCONSISTENTWITHRULESADOPTEDBYTHE WITHCOLORADOSUPREME RULES ADOPTED BY THE COLORADO -2- 174 SUPREME COURT REGARDING THE PRACTICE OF LAW BY ATTORNEYS AND LICENSED LEGALPARAPROFESSIONALSLEGAL ,TRADITIONALLEGALPARAPROFESSIONALS ,TRADITIONAL LEGAL MARKETING ALLOWS ATTORNEYSATTORNEYSANDLAWFIRMSTOADVERTISETHEIRSERVICESWHILECLEARLY ANDIDENTIFYINGTHEMSELVESANDALLOWINGCONSUMERSTOMAKEINFORMED LAW FIRMS TO ADVERTISE THEIR SERVICES WHILE CLEARLY IDENTIFYING THEMSELVES AND ALLOWING CONSUMERS TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS REGARDING THEIR LEGAL REPRESENTATIONREPRESENTATION; ;
(b) LEADL EAD GENERATION LEGAL MARKETING FOR LEGAL SERVICES INVOLVESINVOLVESTHIRDPARTIESTHATSOLICIT THIRDCONSUMERSWHOMAYNEEDLEGAL PARTIESSERVICES THATBY SOLICITOBTAINING CONSUMERSTHE WHOCONSUMER MAYS NEEDPERSONAL LEGALSERVICESBYOBTAININGTHECONSUMERINFORMATION 'SPERSONALINFORMATION AND INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONSUMER 'SS LEGAL ISSUE AND THEN SELLING THAT INFORMATION TO ATTORNEYS OR LAW FIRM;FIRMS ;
(c) EADGENERATIONLEGALMARKETINGFORLEGALSERVICESISLEAD GENERATION LEGAL MARKETING FOR LEGAL SERVICES IS INHERENTLY MISLEADING TO CONSUMERS BECAUSE THE PERSON CONDUCTINGTHELEADGENERATIONLEGALMARKETINGPURPORTSTOBECONDUCTINGTHELEADGENERATIONLEGALMARKETINGPURPORTSTOBEAN ANATTORNEYORREPRESENTATIVEFROMALAWFIRMBUTISACTUALLYNOTAN ATTORNEY OR REPRESENTATIVE FROM A LAW FIRM-FIRM BUTREPRESENTATIVE IS; ACTUALLY NOT AN ATTORNEY OR LAW FIRM REPRESENTATIVE;
(d) LEAD GENERATION LEGAL MARKETING FIRMS TYPICALLY USE "BAIT"BAITAND AND-SWITCH"TACTICS,"LOOK -SWITCHALIKE"ADVERTISING "IMPERSONATION TACTICS , "LOOKFRAUD ALIKE,ANDOTHERDECEPTIVEADVERTISINGPRACTICESTOTARGETINJURED "ORVULNERABLECONSUMERSWHOAREINNEEDOFLEGALREPRESENTATION ADVERTISING , IMPERSONATION ,FRAUD,ANDOTHERDECEPTIVEADVERTISINGPRACTICES TO TARGET INJURED OR VULNERABLE CONSUMERS WHO ARE IN NEED OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION ;
(e) LEADL EAD GENERATION LEGAL MARKETING ALSO MISLEADS THE ATTORNEYSORLAWFIRMSTHATPURCHASETHECONSUMERINFORMATIONATTORNEYS FROMTHELEADGENERATIONLEGALMARKETINGORGANIZATIONBECAUSEOR LAW FIRMS THAT PURCHASE THE CONSUMER INFORMATION FROM THE LEAD GENERATION LEGAL MARKETING ORGANIZATION BECAUSE THE CONSUMER INFORMATION IS OFTEN SOLD TO MULTIPLE FIRMS,THEFIRMS INFORMATIONISERRONEOUS,THE ,ORTHEINFORMATIONDOESNOTREPRESENTINFORMATION IS ERRONEOUS ,OR THE INFORMATION DOES NOT REPRESENT A VIABLE LEGAL CAS;CASE;
-3- 174 (f) BBECAUSE ECAUSE OF THE HARM THAT LEAD GENERATION LEGAL MARKETING CAN HAVE ON CONSUMERS ,ATTORNEYS ,AND, AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION,ITISIMPERATIVETHATTHISPRACTICEBEPROHIBITEDINTHEPAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-174 PROFESSION,IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THIS PRACTICE BE PROHIBITED IN THE STATE AND ENFORCED THROUGH CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIE;PENALTIES ;
(g) CIVILCIVILAND ANDCRIMINALVIOLATIONS CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS RELATED TO THE PRACTICE OF LEADLEADGENERATIONLEGALMARKETINGARECAPABLEOFBEINGENFORCEDBY GENERATIONTHEATTORNEYGENERALANDTHESTATE LEGALSDISTRICTATTORNEYSUNDERTHE MARKETING ARE CAPABLE OF BEING ENFORCED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE STATE 'S DISTRICT ATTORNEYS UNDER THE "COLORADO C ONSUMER PROTECTIONP AROTECTION CT",ACT",ARTICLE ARTICLE1OFTITLE 1OF6,ANDTHE TITLE6,ANDCOLORADO THEC OLORADO CRIMINAL CODE,INCLUDINGCODE ,,INCLUDING BUT,BUT NOT LIMITED TO ,,CRIMINAL CRIMINAL IMPERSONATION ,,FRAUD FRAUD,,AND AND RACKETEERING ;AND (h) THEREFORE,ITTHEREFORE , IT IS IN THE BEST INTERESTCOLORADANSINTEREST COLORADANS TO PROHIBITPERSONSTHATCONDUCTLEADGENERATIONLEGALMARKETINGPROHIBIT PERSONS THAT CONDUCT LEAD GENERATION LEGAL MARKETING FOR LEGAL SERVICES FROM DOING BUSINESS IN THE ST.TESTATE (2) ASA S USED IN THIS SECTI,UNLESSSECTIO,UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:
(a)(I) "LADGENERATIONLEGALMARKETING "MEANSANYFORM" OFMEANSANYFORMOF MARKETING IN WHICH AN ATTORNEY,LAWATTORNEY ,LAW FIRM ,OR, OR LICENSED LEGAL PARAPROFESSIONAL PAYS MONEY OR OTHER COMPENSATION TO A THIRD PARTY TO RECEIVE INFORMATION ABOUT A POTENTIAL CLIENT OR CAS,CASE , WHICH INFORMATION MAY INCLUDE THE POTENTIAL CLIENT'SCLIENT S CONTACT INFORMATION OR INFORMATION ABOUT THE POTENTIAL CLIENTSCLIENT 'S LEGAL ISSUE.
(II) "L"LADGENERATIONLEGALMARKETING EAD"INCLUDESMARKETING GENERATION LEGAL MARKETING " INCLUDES MARKETING IN WHICH COMPENSATION IS PROVIDED TO A THIRD PARTY DIRECTLY,DIRECTLY INDIRECTLY,ON, INDIRECTLY, ON A PER-LEAD OR PER-CASE BASIS,OR AS A SUBSCRIPTION MODEL AND INCLUDES COMPENSATION MADE THROUGH -4-INTERMEDIARIES 174, INTERMEDIARIES,AFFILIATE,ORAFFILIATES,OR OTHER ENTITIE.
(III) "LAD GENERATION LEGALMARKETINGLEGAL MARKETING "DOES NOT INCLUDE THE SHARING OF FEES BETWEEN LICENSED ATTORNEYS,LAWATTORNEYS FIRMS, ,ORLAW LICENSEDLEGALPARAPROFESSIONALSSOLONGASTHEFIRMS, FEESAREOR SHAREDLICENSEDLEGALPARAPROFESSIONALSSOLONGASTHEFEESARESHAREDIN INCOMPLIANCEWITHSTATELAWANDRULESADOPTEDBYTHECOMPLIANCE COLORADOWITH STATE LAW AND RULES ADOPTED BY THE C OLORADO SUPREME COURT .
(b)(b)(I) (I)"TADITIONALLEGALMARKETING "TADITIONAL"MEANSMARKETINGDONE LEGAL MARKETING " MEANS MARKETING DONE BY AN ATTORNEY ,,LAW LAW FIRM ,,OR OR LICENSED LEGAL PARAPROFESSIONAL ,OR BY A THIRD PARTY ON BEHALFOFANBEHALF ATTORNEY,OF LAWAN ATTORNEY ,LAW FIRM ,OR LICENSED PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-174 LEGAL PARAPROFESSIONAL ,DURING WHICH MARKETING THE ATTORNEY , LAW FIRM,FIRM OR,OR LICENSED LEGAL PARAPROFESSIONAL THAT IS ADVERTISING THEIR SERVICES IS CLEARLY IDENTIFIED TO THE CONSUME.CONSUMER .
(II) "TADITIONAL"T RADITIONAL LEGAL MARKETING "INCLUDES," INCLUDES , BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO,SEARCHTO , SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION,OPTIMIZATION PAY-PERCLICK, INTERNETPAY ADVERTISING,RADIOADVERTISING,TELEVISIONADVERTISING,STREAMINGPER ADVERTISING,CLICK BILLBOARDINTERNET ADVERTISING ,,RADIO ANDADVERTISING LISTING,TELEVISION INADVERTISING LEGAL,STREAMING DIRECTORIESADVERTISING ,BILLBOARDADVERTISING ,ANDLISTINGINLEGALDIRECTORIES IN WHICH THE NAME OR IDENTITY OF THE ATTORN,LAWATTORNEY FIRM,OR,LAW FIRM ,OR LICENSED LEGAL PARAPROFESSIONAL IS CLEARLY DISCLOS.DDISCLOSED (3). CONSISTENT WITH RULES ADOPTED BY THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT REGARDING THE PRACTICE OF LAW BY ATTORNEYS AND LICENSEDLEGALPARAPROFESSIONALS ,ANDUNLESSAPERSONMEETSTHE CRITERIADESCRIBEDINSUBSECTION (4)OFTHISSECTION,APERSONSHALL NOT :
(a)(3) PYMONEYOROTHERCOMPENSATIONFORLEADGENERATIONCONSISTENTWITHRULESADOPTEDBYTHE COLORADOSUPREME COURT REGARDING THE PRACTICE OF LAW BY ATTORNEYS AND LICENSED LEGAL MARKETINGPARAPROFESSIONALS SERVICES, INAND UNLESS A PERSON MEETS THE STAT;CRITERIA DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (4) OF THIS SECTIO,A PERSON SHALL NOT :
(b)(a) ENGAGEPAY INMONEY THEOR PRACTICEOTHER OFCOMPENSATION FOR LEAD GENERATION LEGAL -5- 174 MARKETING INSERVICES THE STATE;OR (c) SLLLEADS TO AN ATTORNEY ,LAWFIRM ,OR LICENSED LEGAL PARAPROFESSIONAL IN THE STAT.STATE ;
(4)(b) APERSONENGAGE MAYIN SOLICITTHE APRACTICE POTENTIALOF CLIENTLEAD ORGENERATION MARKET FOR LEGAL SERVICESMARKETING IN THE STATE IF;OR (c) SELL LEADS TO AN ATTORNEY ,LAW FIRM , OR LICENSED LEGAL PARAPROFESSIONAL IN THE PERSO:STATE .
(4) A PERSON MAY SOLICIT A POTENTIAL CLIENT OR MARKET FOR LEGAL SERVICES IN THE STATE IF THE PERSON IS (a) ATHORIZEDBYTHEAUTHORIZED BY THE C OLORADOSUPREMECOURTTOPRACTICEOLORADO SUPREME COURT TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STAT;STATE;
(b) W ORKING ON BEHALF OF A PERSON AUTHORIZED BY THE C OLORADO SUPREME COURT TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STATE,ANDSTATE ,AND THE PERSONWHOISAUTHORIZEDTOPRACTICEPERSON LAWINTHEWHO STATEORTHELAWIS FIRMORBUSINESSFORWHICHTHEPERSONWORKSISCLEARLYIDENTIFIEDAUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE LAW IN ANYTHE ADVERTISEMENTSTATE ,MARKETINGOR MATERIALTHE ,LAW INFORMATION,FIRM OR RESOURCESBUSINESS ;ORFOR (c)WHICH ATHE NONPROFITPERSON ORGANIZATIONWORKS THATIS ENGAGESCLEARLY IDENTIFIED IN LEGALANY SERVICESADVERTISEMENT IN, THEMARKETING STAT.MATERIAL , INFORMATION , OR RESOURCES ;
(5)OR THIS(c) SECTION DOES NOT PROHIBIT A PERSONNONPROFITORGANIZATIONTHATENGAGESINLEGALSERVICES FROM ENGAGING IN THE PRACTICESTATE. OF TRADITIONAL LEGAL MARKETIN.
(6)(a)PAGE ACOURTMAYORDERINJUNCTIVERELIEFINACIVILACTION4-SENATE BROUGHTBILL PURSUANT26-174 TO(5) THIS SECTION.SECTION DOES NOT PROHIBIT A PERSON FROM ENGAGING IN THE PRACTICE OF TRADITIONAL LEGAL MARKETING .
(b)(6) A(a) NACOURT ATTORNEYMAY ,ORDER LAWINJUNCTIVE FIRM,RELIEF ORIN LICENSED LEGAL PARAPROFESSIONAL OR ANY CONSUMER WHO HAS BEEN AFFECTED BY LEAD GENERATION LEGAL MARKETING MAY BRING A CIVIL ACTION TOBROUGHT ENFORCEPURSUANT TO THIS SECTIO.SECTION .
Show all 57 changed lines (17 more)
(c)(b) I A PERSONN ISATTORNEY HELD, TOLAW BEFIRM, INOR VIOLATIONLICENSED OFLEGAL THISPARAPROFESSIONALOR SECTIONANYCONSUMERWHOHAS ASBEEN AAFFECTED RESULTBY OFALEAD CIVILACTIO,THEGENERATION CLAIMANTLEGAL ISMARKETING ENTITLEDMAY TOBRING DAMAGESA INCIVIL THEACTION AMOUNTTO OFENFORCE TENTHIS THOUSANDSECTION. DOLLARS PER VIOLATION , PLUS REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS .
-6-(c) 174IF (7) THEATTORNEYGENERALORADISTRICTATTORNEYMAYBRING A CRIMINALPERSON ACTIONIS AGAINSTHELD ATO PERSONBE THAT ENGAGES IN THEVIOLATION PRACTICE OF LEADTHIS GENERATIONSECTION LEGALAS MARKETINGA IFRESULT THEOFACIVILACTION ATTORNEY,THE GENERALCLAIMANTISENTITLEDTODAMAGES ORINTHE DISTRICTAMOUNT ATTORNEYOF DETERMINESTEN THATTHOUSAND THEDOLLARS PERSON'SPER ACTIONSVIOLATION CONSTITUTE,PLUS AREASONABLE CRIMEATTORNEY PURSUANTFEES TOAND THECOSTS C. OLORADO CRIMINAL CODE , INCLUDING :
(a)(7) CTHE RIMINALATTORNEY IMPERSONATIONGENERAL ,OR ASA DESCRIBEDDISTRICT ATTORNEY MAY BRING ACRIMINALACTIONAGAINST APERSONTHAT ENGAGES IN SECTIONTHE 18-5-113;PRACTICE OF LEAD GENERATION LEGAL MARKETING IF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OR DISTRICTATTORNEYDETERMINESTHATTHEPERSON SACTIONSCONSTITUTE A CRIME PURSUANT TO THE C OLORADO CRIMINAL CODE ,INCLUDING :
(b)(a) OFFENSESCRIMINALIMPERSONATION INVOLVING,ASDESCRIBEDINSECTION FRAUD,AS18-5-113; DESCRIBED IN ARTICL5 OF TITLE18;
(c)(b) RACKETEERINGO ACTIVITY,ASFFENSES DEFINEDINVOLVING INFRAUD SECTIO18-17-103,AS (5);ORDESCRIBED (d)IN ANYARTICLE OTHER5 CRIMEOF UNDERTITLE18; COLORADO LAW .
(8)(c) THERACKETEERINGACTIVITY ATTORNEYASDEFINEDINSECTION GENERAL18-17-103(5); MAY ADOPT ANY RULES NECESSARY TO ENFORCE THIS SECTIO.
(9)OR T(d) HISANY SECTIONOTHER DOESCRIME NOTUNDER LIMITC THEOLORADO COLORADO SUPREME COURT S RULE-MAKING AUTHORITY ,DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY ,OR ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY RELATED TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW IN THE STATE INCLUDING THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW .
SECTION(8) 3.THEATTORNEYGENERALMAYADOPTANYRULESNECESSARYTO ENFORCE THIS SECTION.
Act(9) subjectTHISSECTIONDOESNOTLIMITTHE toCOLORADOSUPREMECOURT petition'S -RULE effective-MAKING dateAUTHORITY -, applicability.(1)DECISION Thisacttakeseffectat12:01a.m.onthedayfollowing-MAKING theAUTHORITY expiration, ofOR theENFORCEMENTAUTHORITYRELATEDTOTHEPRACTICEOFLAWINTHESTATE ninety-day, periodINCLUDING afterTHE finalUNAUTHORIZED adjournmentPRACTICE ofOF theLAW generalassembly(August12,2026,ifadjournmentsinedieisonMay13,. 2026);
exceptPAGE that,5-SENATE ifBILL a26-174 referendumSECTION petition3. is filed pursuant to section 1 (3)ofarticleVofthestateconstitutionagainstthisactoranitem,section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved bythe people at the general election -7- 174 to be held in November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
(2)Act Thisactappliestoconductoccurringonoraftertheapplicablesubject to petition - effective date of- thisapplicability. act.
-8-(1) 174This act takes effect at 12:01 a.m.
on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);exceptthat,if areferendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2026 and, insuchcase,willtakeeffectonthedate of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 26-174 (2) This act applies to conduct occurring on or after the applicable effective date of this act.
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 7-SENATE BILL 26-174
Show all 57 changed rows (17 more)
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
Sponsors
- Adrienne Benavidez · Cosponsor
- M. Rutinel · Cosponsor
- J. Phillips · Cosponsor
- K. Nguyen · Cosponsor
- J. Mabrey · Cosponsor
- M. Lindsay · Cosponsor
- E. Hamrick · Cosponsor
- C. Clifford · Cosponsor
- L. García · Primary
- M. Soper · Primary
- M. Carter · Primary
- Dylan Roberts · Primary
- Jeff Bridges · Cosponsor
- James Coleman · Cosponsor
- Lisa Cutter · Cosponsor
- Lindsey Daugherty · Cosponsor
- Cathy Kipp · Cosponsor
- Robert Rodriguez · Cosponsor
- Marc Snyder · Cosponsor
- Katie Wallace · Cosponsor
- Matt Ball · Cosponsor
- Tony Exum · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 18 co-sponsors · 80 not signed on · 14 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- L. García
- M. Soper
- M. Carter
- Dylan Roberts Democrat
Co-sponsors (18)
- Adrienne Benavidez
- M. Rutinel
- J. Phillips
- K. Nguyen
- J. Mabrey
- M. Lindsay
- E. Hamrick
- C. Clifford
- Jeff Bridges Democrat
- James Coleman Democrat
- Lisa Cutter Democrat
- Lindsey Daugherty Democrat
- Cathy Kipp Democrat
- Robert Rodriguez Democrat
- Marc Snyder Democrat
- Katie Wallace Democrat
- Matt Ball Democrat
- Tony Exum Democrat
Not signed on (80)
80 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 80 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 8 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 51 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 20% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (65)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez R. | — | Yea |
| Stewart K. | — | Yea |
| Stewart R. | — | Yea |
| Winter T. | — | Nay |
| Garcia Sander | — | Nay |
| Alex Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Paschal | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Marshall | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Eliza Hamrick | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Gretchen Rydin | Democrat | Yea |
| Jacque Phillips | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie McCluskie | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kenny Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Lesley Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsay Gilchrist | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Feret | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Lori Goldstein | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandy Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Manny Rutinel | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew Martinez | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Meghan Lukens | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Duran | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina English | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Camacho | Democrat | Yea |
| Sheila Lieder | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Woodrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy Story | Democrat | Yea |
| Tisha Mauro | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Anthony Hartsook | Republican | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Carlos Barron | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Woog | Republican | Nay |
| Dusty Johnson | Republican | Nay |
| Jarvis Caldwell | Republican | Yea |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Don Suckla | Republican | Nay |
| Mary Bradfield | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Max Brooks | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Yea |
| Ron Weinberg | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 29% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Not Voting |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 174 do?
- The act establishes that the practice of lead generation marketing for legal services is a deceptive trade practice that is subject to enforcement under the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act'. 'Lead generation legal marketing' is defined in the act as a form of marketing in which a lawyer, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional pays money or other compensation to a third party to receive information about a potential client or case, including the potential client's contact information or information about the potential client's legal issue or case. Unless a person meets certain criteria, the act prohibits a person from paying money or other compensation for lead generation legal marketing services, engaging in the practice of lead generation legal marketing, or selling leads to an attorney, law firm, or licensed legal paraprofessional. A person may solicit or market for legal services in Colorado only if the person is:Authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado;Working on behalf of a person authorized by the Colorado supreme court to practice law in Colorado and that person is clearly identified in any advertisement, marketing materials, information, or resources; orA nonprofit organization that engages in legal services. The act establishes that a person that engages in the practice of lead generation legal marketing may be subject to both civil and criminal penalties.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 174?
- SB 174 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, M. Rutinel, J. Phillips, K. Nguyen, J. Mabrey, M. Lindsay, E. Hamrick, C. Clifford, L. García, M. Soper, M. Carter, Dylan Roberts (Democrat), Jeff Bridges (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), Lindsey Daugherty (Democrat), Cathy Kipp (Democrat), Robert Rodriguez (Democrat), Marc Snyder (Democrat), Katie Wallace (Democrat), Matt Ball (Democrat), and Tony Exum (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 174?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 21, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 174?
- Track SB 174 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 174
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 174
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →