SB 184 — Firefighter Cancer Benefits & Workers' Compensation
Last action — Governor Vetoed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 29, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 26, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
36 sponsors
4 primary, 32 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (15 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill expands cancer benefits for firefighters under workers' compensation laws.
This bill modifies the Colorado Workers' Compensation Act to include more types of cancer as occupational diseases for firefighters. It also strengthens the burden of proof on employers who wish to contest the presumption that these cancers occurred due to their job.
What this means for you
- Workers: Firefighters may find it easier to receive benefits for cancers linked to their jobs.
- Families: Families of firefighters may benefit from improved financial support if their loved ones develop job-related cancers.
- Small Business: Employers, especially those in the firefighting sector, may face increased challenges in disputing cancer claims.
Summary
Currently, the 'Workers' Compensation Act of Colorado' provides that certain cancers contracted by firefighters are considered occupational diseases presumed to have been a result of the firefighters' employment. A firefighter's employer or an insurer may rebut this presumption by showing by a preponderance of the medical evidence that the cancer did not occur on the job. The act expands the types of cancer that are considered occupational diseases and strengthens the rebuttable presumption to require an employer to show clear and convincing evidence that the cancer did not occur on the job. The act exempts firefighters who are employed by the state.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
147 added · 189 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 184 adds a note about the process for determining whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other actions, indicating it is prepared for signature by legislative officers and the Governor. This change highlights the next steps in the legislative process and informs stakeholders about how to track the bill's progress. It matters because it enhances transparency and allows the public to understand the bill's status as it moves through the government.
SecondNOTE: Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
26-0714.02This Yelanabill Lovehas x2295been SENATEprepared BILLfor 26-184the SENATEsignatures SPONSORSHIPof Rodriguezthe andappropriate Ball,legislative Benavidez,officers Coleman, Danielson, Exum, Gonzales J., Kipp, Kolker, Lindstedt, Marchman, Mullica, Sullivan, Wallace, Weissman HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Carter and Mabrey,the Bacon,Governor. Boesenecker, Camacho, Duran, Garcia, Hamrick, Jackson, Lieder, Lindsay, Nguyen, Ricks, Rutinel, Sirota, Story, Valdez, Velasco, Willford, Zokaie d d e 6 a 0 S n , U g 1 H d y e a Senate Committees House Committees R M Business, Labor, & Technology State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs 3 n 6 A BILL FOR AN ACT d 2 S e 2 C ONCERNING BENEFITS FOR FIREFIGHTERS WHO CONTRACT CERTAIN U R 1 H n y CONDITIONS .
dTo adetermine dwhether Mthe nGovernor Billhas Summarysigned mthe Abill (Note:or taken other action on it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
ThisSENATE summaryBILL applies26-184 toBY thisSENATOR(S) billRodriguez as introduced and doesBall, notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.IfthisbillBenavidez, eCutter, nDanielson, passesExum,GonzalesJ.,Kipp,Kolker,Lindstedt,Marchman,Mullica,Sullivan, thirdWallace, readingWeissman, inColeman; the house of introduction, a bill summary that m 6 applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at T n 0 A U , http://leg.colorado.gov.) E i y S a a R M Current law in the "Workers' Compensation Act of Colorado" r provides that certain cancers contracted by firefighters are considered 3 occupational diseases presumed to have been a result of the firefighters' employment.
Aalso firefighter'sREPRESENTATIVE(S) employerCarter orand anMabrey, insurerBacon, mayBoesenecker, rebutCamacho, thisDuran, nGarcia, presumptionbyshowingbyapreponderanceofthemedicalevidencethatHamrick, dJackson, theLieder, cancerLindsay, didNguyen, notRicks, occurRutinel, onSirota, theStory, job.Valdez, Velasco, Willford, Zokaie.
eC 6ONCERNING TBENEFITS RFOR 0FIREFIGHTERS AWHO nCONTRACT ,CERTAIN ECONDITIONS d. y Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
Double underlining denotes SENATE amendment.
S e a Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material to be added to existing law.n M Dashes through the words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law.
m A Section 2 of the bill updates the law by:
! Expanding the types of cancer that are considered occupational diseases;
! Affordingcertainneurologicalconditionsthepresumption;
and ! Strengthening the presumption to require an employer to showclearandconvincingevidencethatthecancerdidnot occur on the job.
SECTION1.SECTION 1.
Legislativedeclaration.(1)Legislative Thegeneralassemblydeclaration. finds and declares that:
(a)(1) FirefightersThe aregeneral routinelyassembly exposedfinds to carcinogens, heavy metals, and combustiondeclares by-productsthat: in the course of their duties, resulting in a significantly elevated risk of (b) Colorado created a presumption regarding the occupational causation of certain cancers in order to provide greater protections under the "Workers' Compensation Act of Colorado" to recognize the risks firefighters are exposed to;
(c)(a) ScientificandoccupationalhealthdatademonstrateincreasedFirefighters incidenceofareroutinelyexposedtocarcinogens,heavymetals, multiplemyeloma,non-Hodgkinlymphoma,andbladder and respiratorycombustion cancersby-products amongin firefighters;the course of their duties, resulting in a significantly elevated risk of cancer;
and(b) (d)Colorado Thecreated a presumption ofregarding the occupational causationcausationofcertaincancersinordertoprovidegreaterprotectionsunderthe and"Workers' protectionsCompensation withinthe"Workers'CompensationActofColorado"mustbeexpanded,Act strengthened,of andColorado" madeto conclusiverecognize tothe ensurerisks fairness,Capital promptletters claimsor processing,bold and& timelyitalic paymentnumbers ofindicate benefitsnew tomaterial firefightersadded withto theseexisting conditions.law;
dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.
firefighters are exposed to;
(c) Scientific and occupational health data demonstrate increased incidence of multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and bladder and respiratory cancers among firefighters;
and (d) The presumption of occupational causation and protections within the "Workers' Compensation Act of Colorado" must be expanded, strengthened, and made conclusive to ensure fairness, prompt claims processing, and timely payment of benefits to firefighters with these conditions.
(a) MandatesMandatesapresumptionofoccupationalcausationwhenbenefits a presumption of occupational causation when -2- 184 benefits are claimed by a firefighter for certain cancers, unless the presumption is rebutted by clear and convincing medical evidence;
and (b) PreventsPreventsanemployerfromusingtheabsenceofaprior,baseline an employer from using the absence of a prior, baseline medical examination as a basis to deny a firefighter's claim for benefits.
SECTION2.SECTION 2.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,repealandreenact,In Colorado Revised Statutes, repeal and reenact, with amendments, 8-41-209 as follows:
(1) THETHESHORTTITLEOFTHISSECTIONISTHE SHORT TITLE OFTHIS SECTION IS "RUBEN LEWIS SIMS JR.
ACT"A CT" (2) ASA S USED IN THIS SECTI,UNLESSSECTION ,UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:REQUIRES :
(a) "CANCER "MEANS" MEANS :
(II) LADDERBLADDER CANCER ;
(III) OLONCLON CANCER ;
PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-184 (IV) PROSTATE CANCER ;
(V) TESTICULART CANCERESTICULAR ;CANCER;
(VII) NON-HNON ODGKIN-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA ;
(VIII) LUNG CANCER;CANCER ;
(X) LEUKEMIAL EUKEMIA ;
(XIII) BRAIN CANCER;CANCER ;
-3- 184 (XIV) D IGESTIVE CANCERCANCER; ;
(XVI) S KIN CANCERCANCER; ;
(XVIII) BBREAST REAST CANCER ;AND (XIX) R EPRODUCTIVE CANCER .
8 (b) "COVERED"C OVERED INDIVIDUAL ""MEANS MEANS A FIREFIGHTER WHO ,AT THE TIME OF THE DIAGNOSIS OF THE CONDITION FOR WHICH THE FIREFIGHTER IS RECEIVING BENEFIT,HASBENEFITS,HAS AT LEAST FIVE YEARSOFCUMULATIVEYEARS FULLOF -CUMULATIVE ORFULL-OR PARTPART-TIME TIME EMPLOYMENT ,INCLUDING EMPLOYMENT WITH THE STATE ,,OR OR VOLUNTEER SERVICE WITH ONE OR MORE EMPLOYERS AND :
Show all 59 changed lines (19 more)
(I) I CURRENTLY SERVING AS A FIREFIGHTER;OR PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-184 (II) H AS BEEN SEPARATED OR RETIRED FROM SERVICE AS A FIREFIGHTERFIREFIGHTERFORNOMORETHANONEYEARFOREACHYEAROFSERVICE FOR,FOR NO MORE THAN ONE YEAR FOR EACH YEAR OF SERVICE, FOR A PERIOD OF UP TO TEN YEAR.YEARS.
(c) "FIREFIGHTER""F IREFIGHTER" MEANS A FULL -OR PART-TIMEPART -TIME EMPLOYEE OR VOLUNTEERVOLUNTEEROFANYEMPLOYER OFOTHERTHANTHESTATE ANY,WHOSEDUTIESARE EMPLOYER ,OTHER THAN THE STATE ,WHOSE DUTIES ARE DIRECTLY INVOLVED WITH THE PROVISION OF FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES .
"IREFIGHTER"INCLUDES"FIREFIGHTER "INCLUDES :
(I) A VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER ,,AS ASDEFINEDIN DEFINED IN SECTION 31-30-1102 (9)(a);
(II) ASEASONALWILDLANDFIREFIGHTERA ,ASDEFINEDINSECTIONSEASONAL WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER , AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-33.5-1202 (12.5);
(III)A(III) NAN INDIVIDUAL DESCRIBED IN THIS SUBSECTIO(2)(c)WHOSUBSECTION (2)(cWHO PROVIDES VOLUNTEER SERVICES TO A FIRE AUTHORITY CREATED BY AN -4- 184 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT ;AND (IV) ANA N INDIVIDUAL WHO PROVIDES ANY COMBINATION OF THE EMPLOYMENT OR VOLUNTEER FIRE SERVICES OTHERWISE DESCRIBED OR INCLUDED IN THIS SUBSECTIO(2)(c).SUBSECTION (2)(c).
6 (3) EXCEPTE XCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTIO(4)OFSUBSECTION (4)OF THIS SECTIO,IFSECTION,IF A COVERED INDIVIDUAL IS DIAGNOSED WITH OR DIES FROM CANC,THECANCER ,THE CANCER IS PRESUMED TO BE AN OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE ARISING OUT OF AND CONTRACTED IN THE COURSE OFTHEIROF THEIR EMPLOYMENT OR SERVICE AS A FIREFIGHTE.FIREFIGHTER.
(4)(a)(4) NEMPLOYERMAYREBUTTHEPRESUMPTIONSETFORTHIN(a) AN EMPLOYER MAY REBUT THE PRESUMPTION SET FORTH IN SUBSECTION (3)OFTHISSECTIONWITHCLEARANDCONVINCINGMEDICAL(3)OF THIS SECTION WITH CLEAR AND CONVINCING MEDICAL EVIDENCE THAT:THAT :
(I) THE CONDITION IS A PREEXISTING CONDITION ABOUT WHICH THE COVERED INDIVIDUAL KNOWINGLY AND INTENTIONALLY FALSIFIED INFORMATION DURING THE HIRING PROCES;ORPROCESS ;OR (II) TECONDITIONWASCAUSEDSOLELYBYANONOCCUPATIONALTHE CONDITION WAS CAUSED SOLELY BY A NONOCCUPATIONAL CIRCUMSTANCE OR EVENT SUCH THAT THE CONDITION IS ENTIRELY UNRELATEDTOTHECOVEREDINDIVIDUALUNRELATED STO EMPLOYMENTORSERVICEASTHE COVEREDINDIVIDUAL 'S EMPLOYMENT ORSERVICE AS A FIREFIGHTE.PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-184 FIREFIGHTER .
(b) EIDENCEOFACOVEREDINDIVIDUALE STOBACCOUSEVIDENCE OF A COVERED INDIVIDUAL S TOBACCO USE ,GENETIC PREDISPOSITION,PREDISPOSITION , FAMILY HISTORY , OR FAILURE TO OBTAIN A PREEMPLOYMENTMEDICALSCREENINGORPHYSICALEXAMINATIONISNOTPREEMPLOYMENT MEDICAL SCREENING OR PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IS NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE ALONE TO REBUT THE PRESUMPTION DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (3)OF THIS SECTI.NSECTION. (5) (a) HIS SECTION DOES NOT AFFECT ANY DETERMINATION AS -5- 184 TO WHETHER THE CANCER IS COVERED UNDER THE VOLUNTARY FIREFIGHTERCANCERBENEFITSPROGRAMCREATEDINPART 4 OFARTICLE 5 OF TITL29.
(b)(5) IF(a) ATHIS FIREFIGHTERSECTION ISDOES ELIGIBLENOT FORAFFECT BENEFITSANY DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER THE CANCER IS COVERED UNDER THISTHE SECTIONVOLUNTARY ANDFIREFIGHTER PART4CANCER OFBENEFITS ARTICLE5OFPROGRAM TITLE29,THECREATED OFFSETIN PROVISIONSPART OF4OF SECTION8-42-103ARTICLE (1)(hAND5 29-5-403OF (10APPLY.TITLE29.
(b) IFAFIREFIGHTERISELIGIBLEFORBENEFITSUNDERTHISSECTION AND PART 4OF ARTICLE 5 OF TITLE29,THE OFFSET PROVISIONS OF SECTION 8-42-103 (1)(h)AND 29-5-403 (10) APPLY.
Act subject to petition - effective date - applicability.(1)applicability. Thisacttakeseffectat12:01a.m.onthedayfollowing the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the generalassembly(August12,2026,ifadjournmentsinedieisonMay13, 2026);
except(1) that,This if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3)ofarticleVofthestateconstitutionagainstthisactoranitem,section, or part of this act withintakes such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved bythe people at the12:01 generala.m. election to be held in November 2026 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
(2)on Thisthe actday appliesfollowing tothe claimsexpiration filedof onthe orninety-day period after final adjournment of the applicablegeneral effectiveassembly date(August 12, 2026, if adjournment sine die is on May 13, 2026);exceptthat,if areferendumpetitionisfiledpursuanttosection1(3) of article V of the state constitution against this act.act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be heldinNovember2026and,insuch case, will take effect on the dateof the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor.
-6-PAGE 1845-SENATE BILL 26-184 (2) This act applies to claims filed on or after the applicable effective date of this act.
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED________________________________________ (Date and Time) _________________________________________ Jared S.
Polis GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 26-184
Show all 59 changed rows (19 more)
View plain text versions (7)
Action History
-
Governor Vetoed
-
Sent to the Governor
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
-
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Floor
-
House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs
-
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
-
Senate Committee on Business, Labor, & Technology Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology
Sponsors
- Adrienne Benavidez · Cosponsor
- Y. Zokaie · Cosponsor
- J. Willford · Cosponsor
- E. Velasco · Cosponsor
- A. Valdez · Cosponsor
- T. Story · Cosponsor
- E. Sirota · Cosponsor
- M. Rutinel · Cosponsor
- N. Ricks · Cosponsor
- K. Nguyen · Cosponsor
- M. Lindsay · Cosponsor
- S. Lieder · Cosponsor
- J. Jackson · Cosponsor
- E. Hamrick · Cosponsor
- L. García · Cosponsor
- M. Duran · Cosponsor
- S. Camacho · Cosponsor
- A. Boesenecker · Cosponsor
- J. Bacon · Cosponsor
- J. Mabrey · Primary
- M. Carter · Primary
- James Coleman · Cosponsor
- Jessie Danielson · Cosponsor
- Tony Exum · Cosponsor
- Cathy Kipp · Cosponsor
- Chris Kolker · Cosponsor
- William Lindstedt · Cosponsor
- Janice Marchman · Cosponsor
- Kyle Mullica · Cosponsor
- Tom Sullivan · Cosponsor
- Katie Wallace · Cosponsor
- Mike Weissman · Cosponsor
- Matt Ball · Primary
- Robert Rodriguez · Primary
- Lisa Cutter · Cosponsor
- Julie Gonzales · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 32 co-sponsors · 65 not signed on · 14 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- J. Mabrey
- M. Carter
- Matt Ball Democrat
- Robert Rodriguez Democrat
Co-sponsors (32)
- Adrienne Benavidez
- Y. Zokaie
- J. Willford
- E. Velasco
- A. Valdez
- T. Story
- E. Sirota
- M. Rutinel
- N. Ricks
- K. Nguyen
- M. Lindsay
- S. Lieder
- J. Jackson
- E. Hamrick
- L. García
- M. Duran
- S. Camacho
- A. Boesenecker
- J. Bacon
- James Coleman Democrat
- Jessie Danielson Democrat
- Tony Exum Democrat
- Cathy Kipp Democrat
- Chris Kolker Democrat
- William Lindstedt Democrat
- Janice Marchman Democrat
- Kyle Mullica Democrat
- Tom Sullivan Democrat
- Katie Wallace Democrat
- Mike Weissman Democrat
- Lisa Cutter Democrat
- Julie Gonzales Democrat
Not signed on (65)
65 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 65 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jenny Willford | Democrat | Yea |
| Kenny Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Feret | Democrat | Yea |
| Meg Froelich | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Naquetta Ricks | Democrat | Yea |
| Brandi Bradley | Republican | Nay |
| Ken DeGraaf | Republican | Nay |
| Stephanie Luck | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Nay |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 184 do?
- Currently, the 'Workers' Compensation Act of Colorado' provides that certain cancers contracted by firefighters are considered occupational diseases presumed to have been a result of the firefighters' employment. A firefighter's employer or an insurer may rebut this presumption by showing by a preponderance of the medical evidence that the cancer did not occur on the job. The act expands the types of cancer that are considered occupational diseases and strengthens the rebuttable presumption to require an employer to show clear and convincing evidence that the cancer did not occur on the job. The act exempts firefighters who are employed by the state.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 184?
- SB 184 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, Y. Zokaie, J. Willford, E. Velasco, A. Valdez, T. Story, E. Sirota, M. Rutinel, N. Ricks, K. Nguyen, M. Lindsay, S. Lieder, J. Jackson, E. Hamrick, L. García, M. Duran, S. Camacho, A. Boesenecker, J. Bacon, J. Mabrey, M. Carter, James Coleman (Democrat), Jessie Danielson (Democrat), Tony Exum (Democrat), Cathy Kipp (Democrat), Chris Kolker (Democrat), William Lindstedt (Democrat), Janice Marchman (Democrat), Kyle Mullica (Democrat), Tom Sullivan (Democrat), Katie Wallace (Democrat), Mike Weissman (Democrat), Matt Ball (Democrat), Robert Rodriguez (Democrat), Lisa Cutter (Democrat), and Julie Gonzales (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 184?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 29, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 184?
- Track SB 184 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 184
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 184
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →