SB 149 — Pathways for Individuals with Mental Health Disorder

! Has a neurocognitive disorder;

! Is unwilling or unable to complywith voluntarytreatment, or reasonable grounds exist to believe that the person will not remain in a voluntary treatment program;

and ! Is a danger to the person's self, a danger to others, or gravely disabled.

-4- 149 The bill aligns the provisions for short-term and long-term protective placement with certifications for short-term treatment and long-term care with treatment.

HCPF, in collaboration with the BHA, is responsible for finding anappropriateproviderandplacementforapersonsubjecttoashort-term or long-term protective placement.

A protective placement may be terminateduponthesignatureofthetreatingmedicalprofessionalandthe medical director of the facility if, after a reasonable observation and treatment period, the treating medical professional determines the respondent no longer meets the criteria for protective placement.

The bill makes conforming amendments.

SECTIONSECTION1. 1.

InInColoradoRevisedStatutes,amendwithrelocated Colorado Revised Statutes, amend with relocated provisions article 8.5 of title 16 as follows:

________ Capital letters or bold & italic numbers indicate new material added to existing law;

dashes through words or numbers indicate deletions from existing law and such material is not part of the act.

(1) "BEHAVIORAL"BEHAVIORALHEALTHADMINISTRATION HEALTH ADMINISTRATION "OR "BHA" MEANSMEANSTHE THEBEHAVIORALHEALTHADMINISTRATIONESTABLISHEDINSECTION BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION ESTABLISHED IN SECTION 27-60-203.

(2) "CIVIL"C PROCEEDING"MEANSIVIL PROCEEDING " MEANS :

(a) A CIVIL PROCEEDING REGARDING CERTIFICATION FOR SHORT-TERMTREATMENTPURSUANTTOSECTIONSHORT 27-65-108.5,27-65-109,-TERM OR27-65-109.5;TREATMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 27-65-108.5, 27-65-109, OR 27-65-109.5;

(b) A CIVIL PROCEEDING TO IMPOSE A LEGAL DISABILITY OR REMOVAL OF A LEGAL RIGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 10 OF TITLE25.5;ORTITLE 25.5;OR (c) ACIVILPROCEEDINGFORAPROTECTIVEPLACEMENTPURSUANTA CIVIL PROCEEDING FOR A PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT PURSUANT TO PART5PART OF5OF ARTICLE10ARTICLE 10 OF TITLE25.5.TITLE 25.5.

(1)(3)(1) (3) "Collateral materials" means the relevant police incident reports and the charging documents, either the criminal information or indictment.

-5- 149 (2) (4) "Competency evaluation" includes both court-ordered competency evaluations and second evaluations.

(3)(5) "Competency evaluator" means a licensed physician who is aapsychiatristoralicensedpsychologist,eachofwhomistrainedinforensic psychiatrist or a licensed psychologist, each of whom is trained in forensic competency assessments, or a psychiatrist who is in forensic training and practicing under the supervision of a psychiatrist with expertise in forensic psychiatry, or a psychologist who is in forensic trainingandispracticingunderthesupervisionofalicensedpsychologisttraining and is practicing under the supervision of a licensed psychologist with expertise in forensic psychology.

(4)(6) "Competency"Competencyhearing"meansahearingtodeterminewhether hearing" means a hearing to determine whether a defendant is competent to proceed.

(5)(7) "Competenttoproceed"meansthatthedefendantdoesnot"Competent to proceed" means that the defendant does not have a mental disability or developmental disability that prevents the defendant from having sufficient present ability to consult with the defendant's lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding in ordertoassistinthedefenseororder THATto preventsthedefendantfromhavingassist in the defense orAT prevents the defendant from having PAGE 2-SENATE BILL 26-149 a rational and factual understanding of the criminal proceedings.

(8) "COUNTY ATTORNEY " MEANS A COUNTY ATTORNEY OR A QUALIFIEDQUALIFIEDATTORNEYACTINGFORACOUNTYATTORNEYAPPOINTEDBYTHE ATTORNEY ACTING FOR A COUNTY ATTORNEY APPOINTED BY THE DISTRICT COURT OR ,IN, IN ANY COUNTY OR CITY AND COUNTY WITH A POPULATION EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN FIFTY THOUSAND PEOPLE ,THE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OR QUALIFIED ATTORNEY ACTING FOR THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY APPOINTED BY THE DISTRICT COURT .

(6) (9) "Court-ordered competency evaluation" means a court-ordered examination of a defendant either before, during, or after trial,directedtodevelopinginformationrelevanttoadeterminationofthetrial, directed to developing information relevant to a determination of the defendant's competency to proceed at a particular stage of the criminal -6- 149 proceeding, that is performed by a competency evaluator and includes evaluations concerning restoration to competency.

(7) (10) "Court-ordered report" means a report of an evaluation, conducted by or under the direction of the department CDHS, that is the statutorystatutoryobligation obligation of the department CDHS to prepare when requested to do so by the court.

(8)(8)(11) (11)"Criminalproceedings"meanstrial,sentencing,satisfaction "Criminal proceedings" means trial, sentencing, satisfaction of the sentence, execution, and anypretrial matter that is not susceptibleoffairdeterminationwithoutthepersonalparticipationofthesusceptible of fair determination without the personal participation of the defendant.

(9)(9)(12) (12) "Department" OR "CDHS""CDHS"meansthedepartmentof means the department of human services.

(10) (13) "Developmental disability" means a disability that has manifested before the person reaches twenty-two years of ageLD,age OLD , constitutes a substantial disabilityto the affected individualndindividualRSON isattributabletoanintellectualdisabilityorotherneurologicalconditions, and is attributable to an intellectual disability or other neurological conditions when such THE conditions result in impairment of general intellectual functioning or adaptive behavior similar to that of a person with an intellectual disability.

(11) (14) "Executivedirector"meanstheexecutivedirectorofthe"Executive director" means the executive director of the department of human services.

(15)PAGE "G3-SENATE UARDIANBILL 26-149 (15) "GUARDIAN " MEANS A GUARDIAN APPOINTED FOR THE DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 14 OF TITLE15 OR AN EMERGENCY GUARDIANGUARDIANAPPOINTEDPURSUANTTOTHISARTICLE APPOINTED8.5ARTICLE PURSUANT65OFTITLE TO27,OR THIS ARTICLE 8.5,ARTICLE10 65 OF TITLE 27,OR ARTICLE10 OF TITLE25.5.

-7- 149 (16) "DEPARTMENT"D OFHEALTHCAREEPARTMENT POLICYANDFINANCING "OR "HCPF" MEANS THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING "OR "HCPF" MEANSTHEDEPARTMENTOFHEALTHCAREPOLICYANDFINANCING CREATED IN SECTION24-1-119.5.SECTION 24-1-119.5.

(12)(17)(12) (17) "Incompetent to proceed" means that, as a result of a mentaldisabilityordevelopmentaldisability,thedefendantdoesnothavemental disability or developmental disability, the defendant does not have sufficient present ability to consult with the defendant's lawyer with a reasonablereasonabledegreeofrationalunderstandinginordertoassistinthedefense, degree of rational understanding in order to assist in the defense, or that, as a result of a mental disability or developmental disability, the defendantdefendantdoesnothavearationalandfactualunderstandingofthecriminal does not have a rational and factual understanding of the criminal proceedings.

(13)(18)(13) (18) "In-custody" means in prison, in a jail, or in any other locked detention facility that does not meet the definition of "inpatient".

(14)(19) "Inpatient""Inpatient"meansinthecustodyofthedepartmentCDHS, meanseither in thea custodyhospital ofor thein departmenta CDHS,eitherinahospitalorinafull-time,jail-basedrestorationprogramfull-time, jail-based restoration program developed by the departmentHS.departmentDHS.

(20) "INPATIENT"I NPATIENT CARE AT THE DISCRETION OF CDHS" MEANS PLACEMENT AT A FACILITY:

(a) W HERE THE PERSON IS REQUIRED TO RESIDE AND IS NOT PERMITTED TO LEAVE UNLESS ACCOMPANIED AND SUPERVISED BY STAF;STAFF ;

(b) THATTHATAGREESTOSUPERVISETHEPERSON AGREESTHATAGREESTOTAKE TO SUPERVISE THE PERSON,THAT AGREES TO TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO ENSURE THE PERSON COMPLIES WITH ANY COURTCOURTORDERS ORDERS,ANDTHATHASPROCEDURESINPLACETHATWOULDRESULT ,ANDIN THATA HASTIMELY PROCEDURESREPORT INTO PLACETHE THATCOURT WOULD, RESULTINATIMELYREPORTTOTHECOURTLICENSING ,LICENSINGAUTHORITIES,ANDAUTHORITIES,AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IF THE PERSON ABSCONDED WITHOUT PERMISSION ;

(c) W HERE A PROFESSIONAL PERSON ,AS, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 27-65-102,WHOISEMPLOYEDBYORCONTRACTEDWITH27-65-102,WHO CDHS,BHA,IS EMPLOYED BY OR CONTRACTED WITH CDHS, BHA, OR HCPF, ATTESTS THAT THE FACILITY IS MEDICALLY APPROPRIATE AND -8- 149 SUFFICIENTLY PROTECTS VICTIMS AND THE COMMUNITY FROM THE PAGE 4-SENATE BILL 26-149 SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF HARM POSED BY THE PERSO;ANDPERSON ;AND (d) THATTHATISOPERATEDBY IS,ORHASCONTRACTEDWITH OPERATED,CDHS,BHA, BY,OR HAS CONTRACTED WITH , CDHS, BHA OR HCPF TO PROVIDE SERVICES FORCDHS,FOR CDHS, BHA, ORHCPF.OR HCPF.

(15)(21)(15) (21) "Mental disability" means a substantial disorder of thought, mood, perception, or cognitive ability that results in marked functional disability, significantly interfering with adaptive behavior.

"Mental"Mentaldisability"doesnotincludeacuteintoxicationfromalcoholorother disability"substances,oranyconditionmanifestedonlybyantisocialbehavior,orany does not include acute intoxication from alcohol or othersubstances,oranyconditionmanifestedonlybyantisocialbehavior, or any substance abuse impairment resulting from recent use or withdrawal.

However, substance abuse that results in a long-term, substantialdisorderofthought,mood,orcognitiveabilitymayconstitutesubstantial disorder of thought, mood, or cognitive ability may constitute a mental disability.

(16)(22)(16) "Outpatient"(22) means"Outpatient"meansalocationoutsideofthecustodyofthe adepartment locationCDHS. outside of the custodyof the departmentCDHS.

(23) "ESTORABLE"R "MEANSTHEREISASUBSTANTIALPROBABILITYESTORABLE "MEANS THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL PROBABILITY THAT A DEFENDANT ,WITH, WITH RESTORATION SERVICES , WILL ATTAIN COMPETENCY IN THE REASONABLY FORESEEABLE FUTURE .

(24) "RESTORABILIT""R MEANSTHELEGALQUESTIONOFWHETHERESTORABILITY A"MEANSTHELEGALQUESTIONOFWHETHERA DEFENDANT IS RESTORABLE OR UNRESTORABLE.UNRESTORABLE .

(25) "ESTORABILITYHEARING"R "MEANSAHEARINGTODETERMINEESTORABILITY WHETHERHEARING "MEANS A DEFENDANTHEARING WHOTO ISDETERMINE INCOMPETENTWHETHER A DEFENDANTWHOISINCOMPETENT TO PROCEED IS RESTORABLE OR UNRESTORABLE .

(17)(26)(17) (26) "Restoration hearing" means a hearing to determine whetherwhetheradefendantwhohaspreviouslybeendeterminedtobeincompetent a defendant who has previously been determined to be -9- 149 incompetent to proceed has become competent to proceed.

(18) (27) "Second evaluation" means ananACOMPETENCY A COMPETENCY evaluation requested by the court, the district attorney, or the defendant thatisperformedbyacompetencyevaluatorandthatisnotperformedbythat oris underperformedbyacompetencyevaluatorandthatisnotperformedbyorunder the direction of, or paid for by, the departmentdepartment. (19) (28) "Tier 1" means a defendant:

(a)(19) Who(28) has"Tier been1" orderedmeans toa receivedefendant: inpatient restorative treatmentRESTORATION SERVICES ;

(b)PAGE For5-SENATE whomBILL a26-149 competencyevaluator(a) Who has determinedbeen eitherordered thatto thereceive defendant:inpatient restorative treatment RESTORATION SERVICES ;

(I)(b) Appearstohaveamentalhealthdisorderand,asaresultofForwhomacompetencyevaluatorhasdeterminedeitherthatthe thedefendant: mental health disorder, appears to be a danger toENDANT S SEL, A DANGER TO others, or to himself or herself or appears to be gravely disabled;

(I) Appears to have a mental health disorder and, as a result of the mental health disorder, appears to be a danger toEFENDANT S SEL,A DANGER TO others, or to himself or herself or appears to be gravely disabled;

and (c) For whom, as a result of the determination made pursuant to subsection(19)(b)SUBSECTIONsubsection (28)(b)of(19)(b)UBSECTION thissection,delayinginpatient(28)(b) of this section, delaying inpatient hospitalization beyond seven days would cause harm to the defendant or others.

(20) (29) "Tier 2" means a defendant who has been ordered to receive inpatientestorativeinpatient treatmRESTORATIONrestorative treatmentTORATION SERVICES and who does not meet the criteria to be a tier 1 defendant.

(30) "U"UNRESTORABLE NRESTORABLE " MEANS THERE IS NOT A SUBSTANTIAL PROBABILITY THAT A DEFENDANT ,WITH RESTORATION SERVICES ,,WILL WILL ATTAIN COMPETENCY IN THE REASONABLY FORESEEABLE FUTURE .

(31) "V OLITIONALLACKOFCOOPERATIONORUNWILLINGNESSTOOLITIONAL PARTICIPATELACK "MEANSTHEDEFENDANTHASNOTATTENDEDRESTORATIONOF -10-COOPERATION 149 SERVICES OR THEUNWILLINGNESS DEFENDANT REFUSES TO TAKEPARTICIPATE PRESCRIBED"MEANS MEDICATIONSTHE ESPECIALLYDEFENDANT WHENHAS THENOT DEFENDANTATTENDED INTENDSTOAVOIDORRESTORATION DELAYSERVICESORTHEDEFENDANTREFUSESTOTAKEPRESCRIBEDMEDICATIONS THE, COURTESPECIALLYWHENTHEDEFENDANTINTENDSTOAVOIDORDELAYTHECOURT CASE FROM PROCEEDING .

"VOLITIONAL"V OLITIONAL LACK OF COOPERATION OR UNWILLINGNESSUNWILLINGNESSTOPARTICIPATE TO"DOESNOTINCLUDEACTSTHATPRIMARILY PARTICIPATE"DOESRESULT NOTFROM INCLUDETHE ACTSTHATPRIMARILYRESULTFROMTHEBONAFIDEMEDICALORMENTALBONA FIDE MEDICAL OR MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER FOR WHICH THE DEFENDANT IS INCOMPETENT OR A DEFENDANT 'S ATTEMPT TO RAISERAISEABONAFIDEGOODFAITHCONCERNABOUTMEDICATIONSIDEEFFECTS A BONA FIDE GOOD FAITH CONCERN ABOUT MEDICATION SIDE EFFECTS AND RISK.RISKS.

(1) WhileWhileadefendantisincompetenttoproceed,thedefendantmust aPAGE defendant6-SENATE isBILL incompetent26-149 to proceed, the defendant must not be tried or sentenced, nor shall the court consider or decide pretrial matters that are not susceptible of fair determination without the personal participation of the defendant.

However, a determination that a defendantisincompetenttoproceeddoesnotprecludethefurtheranceofdefendant theADDITIONALis incompetent to proceed does not preclude the furtherance of the ADDITIONAL proceedings bytheby courttoconsideranddecidematters,the court to consider and decide matters, including a preliminary hearing and motions, that are susceptible of fair determination prior to trial and without the personal participation of the defendant.

ThoseThoseproceedings proceedingsmaybe may be later reopened if, in the discretion of thethecourt,substantialnewevidenceis court, substantial new evidence is discovered after and asasaresultof a result of the defendant's restoration to competency.

(2) The question of a defendant's competencytocompetency to proceed must be raised in only one of the following manners:

(a) If the judge has reason to believe that the defendant is incompetent to proceed, the judge shall suspend the proceeding and determine the competencyorcompetency incompetencyofor incompetency of the defendant pursuant to section 16-8.5-103;

(b) IfIfeitherthedefenseortheprosecutionhasreasontobelievethat either the defense or the prosecution has reason to believe -11- 149 that the defendant is incompetent to proceed, either party may file a motion in advance of the commencement of the particular proceeding.

A motion to determine competencycompetencyshall shallSTMUST be in writing and contain a certificate of counsel stating that the motion is based on a good faith doubt that the defendant is competent to proceed.

The court mustmustHALL SHALL seal the motion.

If the motion is made by the defense,defense,thedefenseshallprovidetheprosecutionnoticeof thefilingof the defensemotion shallat providethe theprosecutionnoticeoftime thefilingofof themotionatthetimeoffiling, filing,andand if the defense requests a hearing, the defense shall provide the motion to the prosecution at the time the hearing is requested.

The motion may be filedafterthecommencementoftheproceedingif,forgoodcauseshown,filed after the commencement of the proceeding if, for good cause shown, the defendant's mental disability or developmental disability was not known or apparent before the commencement of the proceeding.

(d)(c)(d) (c) By the public defender liaison, as described in section 21-1-104 (6), or an attorney representing the offender in a parole PAGE 7-SENATE BILL 26-149 proceeding.

(3)[Formerly16-8.5-109(1)]Whenadeterminationistobemade(3) as[Formerly to16-8.5-109 a(1)] defendant'sWhen competencyEa ISSUEdetermination OFis WHETHERto Abe DEFENDANTmade ISas INCOMPETENT to proceeda ISdefendant's RAISED,competency theTHE courtISSUE shallOF explainWHETHER toA theDEFENDANT defendantIS theINCOMPETENT naturetoproceed andISRAISED consequences,thecourtshallexplaintothedefendant ofthenatureandconsequencesof thetheproceedingandthe proceeding and the DEFENDANT 'SrightsS rights of the defendant under this section.

The defendant,defendant,RSUANT PURSUANTTOSECTIONTO 16-8.5-108(2)ANDSECTION (3).16-8.5-108(2) AND (3).Ifthedefendantwishestocontestthequestion, THE DEFENDANT mayrequest a competencyhearing that the court shall grant as a matter of right.

Ifthedefendantwishes(3)(4) toNotwithstanding contestany provision of this article 8.5, to the question,Econtrary, DEFENDANTthe mayquestion requestof whether a competencyconvicted hearingperson thatis thementally courtincompetent shallto grantbe asexecuted amust matterbe raised and determined pursuant to part of right.article 1.3 of title 18.

-12-(4) 149(5) (3)If (4)a Notwithstandingdefendant anyis provisioneligible offor referral to the bridges wraparoundcareprogrampursuantarticle8.6of this articletitle 8.5,16, tothecourtmay theaskthepartieswhetherthedefendantshouldbereferredforparticipationin contrary,theprogram.Withtheagreementoftheparties,thecourtmaydelaymaking determinations regarding the questiondefendant's ofcompetency whetherto allow a convictedbridges personwraparound iscare mentallycoordinator incompetent to beconduct executedan mustinitial beintake raisedof andthe determineddefendant pursuant to partsection 1416-8.6-108 ofto articledetermine 1.3whether ofthe titlebridges 18.wraparound care program is appropriate for the defendant.

(4)(5) If a defendant is eligible for referral to the bridges wraparound care program pursuant article 8.6 of this title 16, the court may ask the parties whether the defendant should be referred for participation in the program.

With the agreement of the parties, the court maydelaymaking determinations regarding the defendant's competency to allow a bridges wraparound care coordinator to conduct an initial intake of the defendant pursuant to section 16-8.6-108 to determine whether the bridges wraparound care program is appropriate for the defendant.

(1) (a) Whenever the question of a defendant's competency to proceed is raised, by either party or on the court's own motion, the court maymaymakeapreliminaryfindingofcompetencyorincompetencytoproceed, makewhichisafinaldeterminationunlessapartytothecaseobjectswithinseven a preliminary finding of competency or incompetency to proceed, which is a final determination unless a party to the case objects within seven days after the court's preliminary finding.

(2) If eithereitherpartyobjectsto party objects to the court's preliminarypreliminaryfinding, finding, or if the court determines that it has insufficient information to make a preliminaryfinding,preliminary PAGE 8-SENATE BILL 26-149 finding, the court shall order that the defendant be evaluated forcompetencybythefor departmentCDHSandthatthedepartmentCDHScompetency -13-by 149the department CDHS and that the department CDHS prepare a court-ordered report.

(4) If aapartyrequestsasecondevaluation,anypendingrequests party requests a second evaluation, any pending requests for a hearing must be continueduntilthereceiptofcontinued thesecondevaluationuntil report.Thereportoftheexpertconductingthesecondevaluationmustbe completed and filed with the courtreceipt withinof thirty-five days after the court order allowing the second evaluation,evaluation unlessreport. the time period is extended bythecourtforgoodcause.Thecourtshallprovidethesecondevaluation to the parties and the department.

The departmentreport shallof usethe expert conducting the second evaluationtoensurethatthedepartmentcomplieswithitsresponsibilities,evaluation includingmust reviewingbe completed and summarizingfiled priorwith competencythe opinionscourt aswithin requiredthirty-five bydays sectionafter 16-8.5-105the (5)(f).court orderallowingthesecondevaluation,unlessthetimeperiodisextendedby the court for good cause.

The court shall provide the second evaluation to the parties and the department.

The department shall use the second evaluation to ensure that the department complies with its responsibilities, including reviewing and summarizing prior competency opinions as required bysection 16-8.5-105 (5)(f).

(5)(3)(5) (3) If neither party requests a hePURSUANThearing PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-108 or a second evaluationURSUANTevaluation PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-111, withinwithintheapplicabletimeframe,thecourtshallenterafinaldetermination, thebasedonthe applicable time frame, the court shall enter a final determination, based on the information then available to thethecourt,whetherthedefendant court, whether the defendant is or is not competent to proceed.

(6) If a partypartymakes makes a timelytimelyrequest request for a hearing, the hearing shall be held within thirty-five days after the request for a hearing or, if applicable,withinthirty-fivedaysafterthefilingofthesecondevaluationapplicable, within thirty-five days after the filing of the second evaluation report, unless the time is extended by the court after a finding of good cause.

(7) Atanyhearingheldpursuanttothissection,thepartyassertingAt any hearing held pursuant to this section, the party asserting the incompetency of the defendant shall have the burden of submitting evidence and the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.

-14-(8) 149(4) (8)(4) If thequestionofthe thedefendant'sincompetencytoproceedquestion of the defendant's incompetency to proceed is raised after a jury is impaneled to try the issues raised by a plea of not guiltyguiltyandthecourtdeterminesthatthedefendantisincompetenttoproceed and the court determines that the defendant is incompetent to proceed or orders a court-ordered competencyevaluation,competency evaluation, the court may declare a mistrial.

Declaration of a mistrial under these circumstances doesnotconstitutejeopardy,nordoesitprohibitthetrialorsentencingofdoes not PAGE 9-SENATE BILL 26-149 constitute jeopardy, nor does it prohibit the trial or sentencing of the defendant for the same offense after the defendant has been found restored to competency.

(9) (5) In all proceedings underBROUGHTunder BROUGHT PURSUANT TO this article 8.5, when competency has been raised by the parole board pursuant to section 16-8.5-102 (2)(d)TION(2)(d) SECTION 17-22.5-403.5 (4)(f), the court shall pay forforanyevaluationtodeterminecompetencypursuanttothissection,andthe anyCOMPETENCY evaluation to determine competency pursuant to this section, and tCOMPETENCY evaluation must be conducted at the place where the defendant is in custody.

(1) When a defendant raises the issue of competencycompetencyto to proceed, or whenwhenthecourtdeterminesthatthedefendantisincompetenttoproceed,any claim by the courtdefendant determinesto thatconfidentiality theor defendantprivilege is incompetentdeemed towaived proceed,in anythecaseinwhichcompetencyisraisedandfor claimrecords byor theinformationfrom defendantany toprior confidentialitycriminal orcase privilegein iswhich deemedwaivedinthecaseinwhichcompetencyisraisedandforrecordsthe orinformationfromanypriorcriminalcaseinwhichthedefendantraiseddefendant raised the issue of competency or in which the court determined that the defendant was incompetent to proceed.

(b) Information and documents relating to the competency -15- 149 evaluation that are created by, obtained by, reviewed by, or relied on bybyan anA ACOMPETENCYCOMPETENCY evaluator;performingacourt-orderedevaluation;andevaluator; (c) TheCOMPETENCY evaluator, forthepurposeof discussing the competency evaluation.

(2)performing Upon arequestbyeitherpartyor the court for the information described in subsection (1) of this section, theNCY evaluator or treatment provider shall provide the information for use in preparing for a COMPETENCYcourt-ordered hearing,evaluation; on competency RESTORABILITY HEARING , or restorationEARING and for use during suchTHE hearing.

(3)and Anevaluatororafacilityprovidingcompetencyevaluationor(c) restorationThe treatment servicesS, A COMPETENCY EVALUATORevaluator, ,ORfor A RESTORATIONSERVICEPROVIDERTHATISPERFORMINGWORK pursuantto a court order issued pursuant to this article 8.5 shall provide procedural informationtothecourt,bridgescourtliaison,districtattorney,ordefense counsel concerning the defendant'spurpose location, the defendant's hospital or facility admission status, the status of COMPETENCYdiscussing evaluation procedures, and other procedural information relevant to the casecompetency STATUSevaluation. OF ANY RESTORATION SERVICES.

(4)(2) NothingUpon inThisa sectionrequest limitDOESby NOTeither LIMITparty or the court'scourt abilitytofor orderthe thatinformation information,described in additionsubsection to(1) theof informationthis describedsection, insubsections(1)and(3)ofthissection,beprovidedtothetheCOMPETENCY COMPETENCYevaluator evaluator, or totreatment eitherprovider partyshall toprovide the case,information norfor doesuse itin limitpreparing thefor informationa thatCOMPETENCY ishearing, availableon aftercompetency theRESTORABILITY writtenHEARING consent, ofor therestoration defendant.HEARING and for use during such a THE hearing.

(4.5)5)(3) TheAn evaluator or a facility providing competency evaluation or PAGE 10-SENATE BILL 26-149 restoration treatment services CDHS, A COMPETENCY EVALUATOR , OR A RESTORATIONSERVICE PROVIDER THAT IS PERFORMING WORK pursuant to a court may,order uponissued pursuant to this article 8.5 shall provide procedural information to the requestcourt, bridges court liaison, district attorney, or defense counsel concerning the defendant's location, the defendant's hospital or facility admission status, the status of eitherANY party,COMPETENCY issueevaluation anprocedures, ordertoassistapartyinaccessing,receivingcopiesof,ordiscussingwithand another ACOMPETENCYprocedural evaluatorortreatmentproviderinformationorrecordsinformation thatthepartyhastherighttorelevant accessto pursuantthe tothedefendant'swaiverofcase -16-THE 149STATUS privilege.OF ANY RESTORATION SERVICES .

If(4) aNothing partyin requestsThissectionlimits suchDOESNOTLIMIT anthecourt's order,ability theto courtorder shallthat allowinformation, thein opposingaddition party to makethe anyinformation legaldescribed objection,in includingsubsections whether(1) theand requested(3) informationof isthis withinsection, thebe scopeprovided ofto the defendant'sCOMPETENCY waiverevaluator,ortoeitherpartytothecase,nordoesitlimittheinformationthat ofis privilege,available andALLafter considerthe anywritten requestsconsent forof protective orders prior to issuing the courtdefendant. order.

This(4.5)(5) sectionThe doescourt notmay, limitupon the court'srequest abilityof toeither orderparty, informationissue bean providedorder to assist a party in accessing, receiving copies of, or discussing with an A COMPETENCY evaluator or treatment provider information or records that the writtenparty consenthas ofthe right to access pursuant to the defendant.defendant's waiver of privilege.

(5)(6)If Thecourtshallorderboththeprosecutorandthedefendanta orthedefendant'scounseltoexchangethenames,addresses,reports,andparty statementsofeachphysicianorpsychologistwhohasexaminedortreatedrequests such an order, the defendantcourt shall allow the opposingpartytomakeanylegalobjection,includingwhethertherequested information is within the scope of the defendant's waiver of privilege, and SHALL consider anyrequests for competency.protective orders prior to issuing the court order.

(6)(7)This Statementssection madedoes bynot limit the defendantcourt's inabilityto theorder courseinformation ofbe anyprovided COMPETENCYto evaluationa mustparty bewith protectedthe inwritten accordanceconsent withof sectionthe 16-8.5-108SECTION16-8.5-107.defendant.

(5)(6) The court shall order both the prosecutor and the defendant or the defendant's counsel to exchange the names, addresses, reports, and statements of each physician or psychologist who has examined or treated the defendant for competency.

(6) (7) Statements made by the defendant in the course of any COMPETENCY evaluation must be protected in accordance with section 16-8.5-108 SECTION 16-8.5-107.

CompetencyCompetencyevaluations,locations,timeframes,and evaluations, locations, time frames, and report.

(1)(a)(I)(1) Thecourtshallorderthatthecompetencyevaluationbe(a) (I) The court shall order that the competency evaluation be conducted on an outpatient basis or, if the defendant is unable to post the monetaryconditionPAGE 11-SENATE BILL 26-149 monetary condition of bond or is ineligible to be released on bond, at the placewherethedefendantisin-custody,exceptasprovidedinsubsectionplace where the defendant is in-custody, except as provided in subsection (1)(b) of this section.

WNWHEN THE COURT ORDERS A COMPETENCY EVALUATION ,THECOURTSHALLALSOORDERTHEAPPROPRIATEPARTYTO,THE TRANSMITTHECOLLATERALMATERIALSTOCOURT CDHSSHALL WITHINTWOBUSINESSALSO DAYSORDER AFTER THE ORDERAPPROPRIATE FORPARTY ATO COMPETENCYTRANSMIT EVALUATIONTHE ,COLLATERAL WITHMATERIALS ATO CERTIFICATECDHS OFWITHIN SERVICETWO OFBUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE COLLATERALORDER MATERIALSFOR PROVIDEDA TOCOMPETENCY THEEVALUATION ,WITH A CERTIFICATEOFSERVICEOFTHECOLLATERALMATERIALSPROVIDEDTOTHE COURT AND OTHER NECESSARY PARTIESPARTIES. .

IFI F THE PARTIES ARE COMMUNICATINGCOMMUNICATINGWITHTHE WITH THE COURT BYBYELECTRONICMEANSANDTHE ELECTRONIC MEANS AND THE -17- 149 ORDER FOR A COMPETENCY EVALUATION IS ISSUED BY ELECTRONIC MEANSMEANS,CDHS , CDHS SHALL ACCEPT THE ORDER BY THE SAME ELECTRONIC MEANS .

(II) If the departmentCDHSdepartmentS conducts the COMPETENCY evaluation ononanin-custodybasis,thedepartmentCDHSshallbeginthe anCOMPETENCY in-custodyevaluation basis,as thesoon departmentallas beginpracticBUT theSHALL COMPETENCYCOMPLETE evaluationassoonaspracticabBUTSHALLCOMPLETETHETHE COMPETENCY EVALUATION NO LATER THAN TWENTY ONE-ONE DAYS after the department's receipt oRECEIVINGof aRECEIVING THE COLLATERAL MATERIALS AND court order directing thePETENCYtheMPETENCY evaluation If the evaluation is conducted on an in-custodyin-custodybasis,thedepartmentshallcompletetheevaluationnolaterthan basis,twenty-one thedays departmentafter shallreceipt completeof the evaluationnolaterthantwenty-onedaysafterreceiptoftheorderandtheorder and the collateral materiBEBEterials COMPLETED.COMPLETED .

(III) If CDHSCDHSCONDUCTS CONDUCTS the COMPETENCY evaluation is conducted on an out-of-custody basis, the department CDHS shall completetheCOMPETENCYcomplete evaluationwithinforty-twodaysafterreceiptthe oftheorderandTHECOMPETENCY collateralmaterials,unlessthecourtextendsthetimeevaluationwithinforty-twodaysafterreceiptoftheorderand THE collateral materials, unless the court extends the time upon a showing of good cause.

TCOURTTE COURT SHALL DETERMINE THE TYPE OFBONDANDTHECONDITIONSOFRELEASEAFTERCONSIDERATIONOFTHEOF PRESUMPTIONSANDFACTORSENUMERATEDINARTICLEBOND AND THE CONDITIONSOFRELEASEAFTERCONSIDERATIONOFTHEPRESUMPTIONSAND FACTORS ENUMERATED IN ARTICLE 4 OFTHISTITLE16,OF WHICHTHIS TITLE16,WHICH INCLUDE CONSIDERATION OF THE INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM ANY PRETRIAL SERVICES PROGRAM PURSUANT TO SECTIO16-4-106SECTION 16-4-106 AND ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE BRIDGES COURT LIAISON HIRED OR CONTRACTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 95OF TITLE13.ATITLE S13. A CONDITION OF ANY BOND ,THE COURT SHALL REQUIRE THE DEFENDANTS COOPERATION WITH THE COMPETENCY EVALUATION ON AN OUTPATIENT BASIS .

NS SETTINGA THECONDITION BOND,THEOF COURTANY SHALLBOND NOT, CONSIDER THE NEEDCOURT FORSHALL REQUIRE THE DEFENDANT S COOPERATION WITHTHECOMPETENCYEVALUATIONONANOUTPATIENTBASIS .NSETTING THEBOND THECOURTSHALLNOTCONSIDERTHENEEDFORTHEDEFENDANT TO RECEIVE AN EVALUATIONPURSUANTEVALUATION TOTHISPURSUANT ARTICLETO 8.5THIS -18-ARTICLE 1498.5AS AS A FACTOR IN DETERMINING ANY MONETARY CONDITION OF BOND .

(II) Atthetimeanyevaluationisordered,thecourtshallorderthatAt the collateraltime materialsany beevaluation transmittedis toordered, the departmentcourt withinshall twenty-four hours after the order bythat thePAGE appropriate12-SENATE partyBILL with26-149 athecollateralmaterialsbetransmittedtothedepartmentwithintwenty-four certificatehoursaftertheorderbytheappropriatepartywithacertificateof ofserviceof service of the materials provided to the court and other necessarypartiesbythepartyorderedtotransmitthecollateralmaterials.necessaryparties bythe party ordered to transmit the collateral materials.

(III) ThecourtshalldeterminethetypeofbondandtheconditionsThe ofreleaseafterconsiderationofthepresumptionsandfactorsenumeratedcourt inarticle4ofthistitle16,whichincludeconsiderationoftheinformationshall receivedfromanypretrialservicesprogrampursuanttosection16-4-106determine the type of bond and the conditions of release after consideration of the presumptions and factors enumerated in article 4 of this title 16, which include consideration of the information received from any pretrial services program pursuant to section 16-4-106 and any information provided by the bridges court liaison hired or contracted pursuant to article 95 of titletitle13. 13.

As a condition of anyanybond, bond, the court shall require the defendant's cooperation with the competency evaluationonanoutpatientevaluation andon out-of-custodybasis.Insettingthebond, the court shall not consider the need for the defendant to receive an evaluationoutpatient pursuantand toout-of-custody thisbasis. article 8.5 as a factor in determining any monetary condition of bond.

(IV)In Nothingsetting inthe Thisbond, subsection (1)(a) limits the availabilitycourt ofshall DOESnot NOTconsider LIMITthe Aneed PERSONfor Sthe ABILITYdefendant TOto SEEKareceive court-orderedan evaluation forpursuant ato personthis witharticle a8.5 mentalas healtha disorderfactor orin invokesdetermining INITIATEany themonetary procedureforanemergencymentalhealthholdsetforthincondition PURSUANTTOof sectionbond. 27-65-106.

(b)(I)(IV) NotwithstandingNothinginThissubsection(1)(a)limitstheavailabilityof theDOES provisionsofubsection(1)(a)ofNOT thisLIMIT section,A thePERSON courtS mayABILITY orderTO theSEEK defendanta placedcourt-ordered inevaluation thefor department'sa CDHS'person Swith custodya formental thehealth timedisorder necessaryor toinvokesTO conductINITIATE the ANprocedure inpatientfor competencyan evaluationemergency if:mental health hold set forth in PURSUANT TO section 27-65-106.

(I)(A)(b) The(I) departmentNotwithstanding CDHSthe providesprovisions aof recommendationsubsection to(1)(a) theof -19-this 149section, court,the aftercourt consultatCONSULTINGmay withorder the defendant andplaced reviewin ofthe REVIEWINGdepartment's anyCDHS' clinicalS orcustody collateralfor materials,the thattime conductingnecessary theto competencyconduct evaluationthe onAN an inpatient basiscompetency isevaluation clinicallyif: appropriate;

(II)B)(I)(A) ThecourtfindsthatthecompetencyevaluationandreportThe providedbythedepartmentdepartment CDHSisinsufficientbecauseitdoesnotmeetCDHS statutoryprovides requirementsa pursuantrecommendation to subsectionthe (5)court, after consultationCONSULTING with the defendant and review of thisREVIEWING sectionany clinical or thatcollateral twomaterials, orthat moreconducting conflictingthe competency evaluationsevaluation andon reportsan haveinpatient beenbasis completed;is clinically appropriate;

or(II)(B) (III)C)The Extraordinarycourt circumstancesfinds relatingthat to the casecompetency orevaluation theand defendantreport makeprovided conductingby the competencydepartment evaluationCDHS onis aninsufficient inpatientbecause basisit necessarydoes not meet statutoryrequirementspursuanttosubsection (5) of this section or thattwo or more conflicting competency evaluations and appropriate.reports have been completed;

or (III)(C) Extraordinary circumstances relating to the case or the PAGE 13-SENATE BILL 26-149 defendantmakeconductingthecompetencyevaluationonaninpatientbasis necessary and appropriate.

2019.) (b.3)(II)(b.3) Uponentryofacourtorderpursuanttosubsection(1)(b)(II) Upon entry of a court order pursuant to subsection (1)(b) SUBSECTION (1)(b)(I) of this section, thedepartmentCDHSthe department CDHS has the same authorityauthoritywith with respect to custodycustodyas as provided for in section 16-8-105.5 (4).

(b.5)(III)(b.5) (III) When the court orders an inpatient COMPETENCY evaluation,evaluation,thecourtshalladvisethedefendantthatrestorationservicesmay the court shall advise the defendant that restoration services may commence immediately if the COMPETENCY evaluation concludes OPINESthatOPINES that the defendant is incompetent to proceed, unless either party objects at the time of the advisement, or within seventy-two hours after thetheeceipt receipt of the writteREPORTwrittenREPORT OFOFTHE THE COMPETENCY evaluation submitted to the court.

The court shall record any objection to the order of commitment to the departmentDHS.department CDHS.

(b.6) IfIftheevaluatorconcludesthatthedefendantisincompetentto proceedandthatinpatientrestorationservicesarenotclinicallyappropriate, the evaluatordepartment concludesthattheshall defendantdetail isthe incompetentoutpatient to proceed and thatout-of-custody inpatient restoration services are not clinically appropriate,thedepartmentshalldetailtheoutpatientandout-of-custody -20- 149 restoration services available to the defendant.

(b.7) (IV) When the court orders an inpatientCOMPETENCYinpatient evaluation,COMPETENCY theevaluation,thedefendantmustbeofferedadmissiontothehospitalorother defendant must be offered admission to the hospital or other inpatient program within fourteen days after receipt of the court order and collateral materials.

The court shall review the case in twenty-one days to determine if transportationtothehospitaltransportation to the hospital or program has been completed or if further orders are necessary.

2019.) (c) [Formerly 16-8.5-105 (1)(b.6)] If theTENCYthe COMPETENCY evaluator concludes OPINESthatOPINES that the defendant is incompetent to proceed and that inpatientrestorationservicesarenotclinicallyappropriate,thedepartmentinpatient restoration services are not clinicallyappropriate, the department CDHS shall detail the outpatient and out-of-crestorationout-of-custody restoration services available to the defendant.

(d) (I) If a defendant is in the department'sScustodydepartment'sCDHS' S custody for purposesofthecompetencyevaluationorderedpursuanttothisarticle8.5purposes of the competency evaluation ordered pursuant to this article 8.5 PAGE 14-SENATE BILL 26-149 and the defendant has completed the competency evaluation and the COMPETENCY evaluator has concludOPINEDconcluded OPINED that:

(A) Thedefendantiscompetenttoproceed,thedepartmentCDHSThe may return the defendant tois acompetent county jail or to proceed, the community,department asCDHS determinedbythedefendant'sbondstatus;Iftheevaluatorhasconcludedmay thatreturn (B)the The defendant is incompetent to proceeda andcounty thatjail inpatientor restoration services are not clinically appropriate, and outpatient restoration services are available to the defendant in the community, theas departmentdetermined CDHSby shall notifythe court and the bridgesdefendant's courtbond BYaisonstatus; ELECTRONICMEANS ,andthedepartmentCDHSshalldevelopadischarge planandaplanforcommunity-basedrestorationservicesincoordination -21- 149 with the community restoration services provider.

(II)If Thethe courtevaluator shallhas holdconcluded athat hearing(B) withinThe sevendefendant daysis afterincompetent receivingto theproceed noticePURSUANTand TOthat SUBSECTIONinpatient (1)(d)(I)(BOFrestorationservicesarenotclinicallyappropriate,andoutpatientrestoration THISservices SECTION,are atavailable whichto the departmentdefendant CDHSin shall provide to the courtcommunity, the plandepartment forCDHS community-basedshall restorationnotify services,the court and the bridges court mayliaisoBY enterELECTRONIC anyMEANS appropriate,andthedepartmentCDHSshalldevelopadischargeplanandaplan ordersfor regardingcommunity-based therestoration custodyservices ofin thecoordination defendantwith and the defendant'scommunity bondrestoration status.services provider.

The(II) Thecourtshall hold a hearing within seven days after receiving thenotice PURSUANTTOSUBSECTION (1)(d)(I)(B)OFTHISSECTION ,atwhich the department CDHS shall adviseprovide to the defendantcourt of the dateplan for community-based restoration services, and timethe court may enter any appropriate orders regarding the custody of the courtdefendant hearing.and the defendant's bond status.

IfThe thedepartmentCDHS departmentshall CDHSisreturningthedefendanttoacountyjail,thecountysheriffintheadvise jurisdiction where the defendant must return shall take custody of the defendantdate withinand seventy-twotime hoursof after receiving notification fromthe department CDHS that the defendant'scourt COMPETENCYhearing. evaluation is completed.

AtIf the timedepartment CDHS is returningthedefendanttoacountyjail,thecountysheriffinthejurisdiction where the departmentDHSdefendant notifiesmust return shall take custodyof the sheriff,defendant within seventy-two hours after receiving notification from the departmentCDHSshallalsonotifythecourtandthebridgescourtliaisondepartmentDHS thatthedepartmentCDHSisreturningthedefendanttothecustodyofthethat jail.the defendant'sOMPETENCY evaluation is completed.

(e)At Nothingthe inThistime sectionthe restriDOESdepartment NOTCDHS RESTRICTnotifies the rightsheriff, ofthe department CDHS shall also notify the defendantcourt toand procurethe abridges competencycourt evaluationliaison asthat providedthe indepartment section16-8.5-106ATTHEDEFENDANTis 'SREQUESTPURSUANTTOSECTIONreturning 16-8.5-111(1).the defendant to the custody of the jail.

(2)(e) TheNothingin defendantThissectionrestrictsDOESNOT shallRESTRICT MUSTthe cooperateright withof the competencydefendant evaluatorto andprocure witha othercompetency personnelevaluation providingas ancillaryprovided servicesin suchsection as16-8.5-106 testingandradiologicalservices.StatementsmadebythedefendantintheAT courseoftheTHE COMPETENCYDEFENDANT evaluationshallbeARES protectedasprovidedREQUEST inPURSUANT sectionTO 16-8.5-108SECTIONSECTION 16-8.5-107.16-8.5-111 (1).

If(2) theThe defendant doesshall notMUST cooperate with the competency evaluator and other personnel providing ancillary services and the lack of cooperation is not the result of a -22- 149 developmentaldisabilityoramentaldisability,thefactofthedefendant's noncooperation with the competency evaluator and other personnel providing ancillary services maysuch beas admissibletesting inand theradiological defendant'sservices. competency HEARING ,RESTORABILITYHEARING ,orrestorationhearingto rebut any evidence introduced by the defendant with regard to the defendant's competency.

(3)Statements Tomade aidby in forming an opinion as to the competencyfdefendant the defendantDEFENDANT S COMPETENCY , it is permissible in the course of anACOMPETENCYtheCOMPETENCY evaluationunderevaluation PURSUANTTOshall thissectiontouseTHEbeARE DEFENDANTprotected 'Sconfessionsandadmissionsof the defendantandanyother evidenceofthecircumstancessurroundingthecommissionoftheoffense, as wellprovided asPAGE tDEFENDANT15-SENATE SBILL medical26-149 andin socialsection history,16-8.5-108 ofSECTION the16-8.5-107. defendant inquestioningthedefendant.Whenthedefendantisnoncooperativewith the competencyevaluator or personnel providing ancillaryservices, COMPETENCY EVALUATOR MAY RENDER an opinion of thDEFENDANT 'S competency of the defendant may be rendered by the competency evaluatoraseduponconfessions,admissions,andanyotherevidenceof the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense, as well as theDEFENDANT 'Sknownmedicalandsocialhistory,ofthedefendant,and the opinion may be admissible into evidence at the defendant's competency or restoration hearing.

(4)If TECOMPETENCYEVALUATORSHALLPREPAREthe awrittenreportdefendant ofdoes theCOMPETENCYnot evaluation,cooperate mustwith bethe preparedcompetency evaluator and other personnel providing ancillary services and the departmentlack CDHSof shallcooperation electronicallyis delivernot the reportresult of a developmental disability or a mental disability, the fact of the defendant's noncooperation with the competency evaluator and other personnel providing ancillary services may be admissible in the defendant's competency HEARING ,RESTORABILITY HEARING , or restoration hearing to rebut any evidence introduced by the courtrkdefendant whowith orderedregard it.to the defendant's competency.

The(3) clerkTo shallaid providein aforming copyofan theopinion reportas to the prosecutingcompetency attorney,of the bridgesdefendant courtDEFENDANT liaison,S andCOMPETENCY the, defenseit counselis usingpermissible in the course of an e-filingA systeASCOMPETENCY ORDEREDevaluation USINGunder ANPURSUANT ETO FILINGthis SYSTEMsection RECORDto INuseTHE THEDEFENDANT -23-S 149confessions MATTERand .Withoutreducinganyothertimelinessetforthinthisarticle8.5,admissions of the competencydefendant evaluatorand shallany provideother theevidence writtenof reportthe tocircumstances surrounding the courtcommission withinof fourteenthe daysoffense, afteras finishingwell meeting,as ortheEFENDANT attemptingS tomedical meet,and withsocial history, of the defendant toin evaluatequestioning the defendant'sdefendant. competency.

(5)When Thethe competencyevaluationdefendant andreportmustis include,noncooperative butwith needthe notcompetency beAREevaluator NOTor limitedpersonnel to:providing ancillary services, THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR MAY RENDER an opinion of the DEFENDANT S competencyofthedefendantmayberenderedbythecompetencyevaluator based upon confessions, admissions, and any other evidence of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense, as well as the DEFENDANT S known medical and social history, of the defendant, and the opinion may be admissible into evidence at the defendant's competencyor restoration hearing.

(a)(4) Thenameofeachphysician,psychologist,orotherexpertwhoTHE examinedCOMPETENCY EVALUATOR SHALL PREPARE a written report ofthe COMPETENCY evaluation,mustbepreparedandthedepartmentCDHS shall electronicallydeliver the defendant;report to the court clerk whored it.

(b)The Aclerk descriptionshall provide a copy of the nature,report content,to extent,the andprosecuting resultsattorney, of the competencyevaluationbridges andcourt anytestsliaison, conducted,and whichmustinclude,butthe needdefense notcounsel beISusing NOTlimitedan to,e-filing thesystAS informationORDERED reviewedUSING andAN reliedE upon-FILING inSYSTEM conductingthecompetencyevaluationandspecifictestsRECORD conductedIN byTHE theMATTER competency. evaluator;

(c)Without Adiagnosisandprognosisofthedefendant'smentaldisabilityreducing any other timelines set forth in this article 8.5, the competency evaluator shall provide the written report to the court within fourteen days after finishing meeting, or developmentalattempting disability;to meet, with the defendant to evaluate the defendant's competency.

(d)(c)(5) AnThe THEcompetency COMPETENCYEVALUATORevaluation 'Sopinionastowhetherand thedefendantcurrentlysuffersfromamentaldisabilityordevelopmental disability,BOTH .Iftheopinionofthecompetencyevaluatoristhatthe defendant suffers from a mental disability or developmental disability, then the report must includeinclude, anbut opinionneed asnot tobe theARE diagnosisNOT andlimited theto: prognosisofthedefendant'smentaldisabilityordevelopmentaldisability.

(e)(d)PAGE An16-SENATE THEBILL COMPETENCYEVALUATOR26-149 'Sopinionastowhether(a) theThe defendantname isof competenteach tophysician, proceedpsychologist, or incompetentother toexpert proceed.who examined the defendant;

If(b) A description of the opinionnature, content, extent, and results of the competencyevaluatorsthatcompetency evaluation and any tests conducted, which must include, but need not beIS NOT limited to, the defendantinformation isreviewed incompetentand torelied proceed,upon thenin conducting the reportcompetency mustevaluation include:and specific tests conducted by the competency evaluator;

(I)(A)(c) AnA THECOMPETENCYEVALUATORdiagnosis Sopinionastowhetherand thereprognosis isof a substantial probability that the defendant,defendant's withmental restorationdisability -24-or 149developmental services,willattaincompetencywithinthereasonablyforeseeablefuture;disability;

(d)(c) AnT HECOMPETENCYEVALUATOR Sopinionastowhetherthe defendant currently suffers from a mental disability or developmental disability,R BOTH .

If the opinion of the competency evaluator is that the defendantsuffersfromamentaldisabilityordevelopmentaldisability,then the report must include an opinion as to the diagnosis and the prognosis of the defendant's mental disability or developmental disability.

(e)d) AnT HECOMPETENCYEVALUATOR Sopinionastowhetherthe defendantiscompetenttoproceedorincompetenttoproceed.Iftheopinion ofthecompetencyevaluator isthatthedefendantisincompetenttoproceed, then the report must include:

(I) (A) An THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR S opinion as to whether there is a substantial probability that the defendant, with restoration services, will attain competency within the reasonably foreseeable future;

IF THE OPINION REGARDING RESTORABILITY DIFFERS FROM OPINIONS IN PAST EVALUATIONS OF THE DEFENDANT ,THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR SHALLSHALLEXPLAIN EXPLAIN THE BASIS FOR THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR S DIFFERING OPINION.OPINIONS .

(B) TTHE HECOMPETENCYEVALUATORCOMPETENCY 'SOPINIONASTOWHETHERTHEEVALUATOR DEFENDANTPOSESASUBSTANTIALRISKOFSERIOUSHARMTOOTHERSS OPINION AS TO WHETHER THE DEFENDANT POSES A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF SERIOUS HARM TO OTHERS ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION27-65-102,IFSECTION 27-65-102, IF THE OPINION IS THAT THE DEFENDANT IS UNRESTORABLE AND THE DEFENDANT IS EITHER CHARGED WITH HOMICIDE PURSUANT TO PART 11OF OFARTICLE ARTICLE33OF OFTITLE TITLE18;A18;A CRIME OF VIOLENCE ,AS DEFINEDPAGE IN17-SENATE SECTION18-1.3-406BILL (2)OR26-149 A FELONY THAT CONSTITUTES UNLAWFUL SEXUAL BEHAVIOR ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 16-22-102;18-1.3-406 (2);

OR THEA DISTRICTFELONY ATTORNEY PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THECONSTITUTES DISTRICTUNLAWFUL ATTORNEYSEXUAL ISBEHAVIOR AWARE,AS OFDEFINED AN ACT DESCRIBED IN SECTION 16-8.5-11816-22-102; (6)(b)(ITHAT IS NOT CHARGED IN THE CURRENT CASE THE DEFENDANTISALLEGEDTOHAVECOMMITTEDANDISORWASCHARGEDIN A CRIMINAL CASE INCOLORADO IN WHICH COMPETENCY WAS RAISED .

(B)OR (C)THE IfDISTRICT possible,ATTORNEY whenPROVIDED theNOTICE defendantTHAT isTHE diagnosedDISTRICT withATTORNEY aIS moderateAWARE toOFAN severeintellectualACT orDESCRIBED developmentalIN disabilitySECTION acquired16-8.5-118 or(6)(b)(ITHAT traumaticIS brainNOT injury,CHARGED or demeORANEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDER ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION25.5-10-501,THE whichCURRENT eitherCASE aloneTHE orDEFENDANT togetherIS withALLEGED aTO co-occurringHAVE mentalCOMMITTEDAND illnessABILITYIS affectsOR theWAS defendant'sCHARGED abilityIN toA gainormaintaincompetency,theevaluatorshallprovideanopinionastoCRIMINALCASEIN whetherCOLORADOIN thereWHICH isCOMPETENCY aWAS substantialRAISED probability. that the defendant with -25- 149 restoration services will attain competency within the reasonably foreseeable future.

WhenND(B) the(C) opinionIf ispossible, thatwhen therethe defendant is diagnosed with a substantialmoderate probabilityofto attainingsevere competencyintellectual DEFENDANTISRESTORABLEordevelopmental ,disability theacquired COMPETENCYor evaluatorshallspecificallystatewhethertCOMPETENCYtraumatic evaluatorbrain believesinjury, thereor aredementiOR uniqueA NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDER ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 25.5-10-501, which either alone or differenttogether serviceswith outsidea co-occurringmentalillness DISABILITY affectsthedefendant'sabilitytogain or maintain competency, the standardcompetencyrestorationcurriculumdevelopedbythedepartmentevaluator CDHSthatthedefendantmayneedinordertoberestoredtocompetencyshall provide an opinion as to whetherthereisasubstantialprobabilitythatthedefendantwithrestoration services will attain competency within the reasonably foreseeable future.

(II)When AnIFTHEAND COMPETENCYEVALUATORthe 'SOPINIONPURSUANTopinion TOis SUBSECTIONthat (5)(d)(I)(AOFthere THISis SECTIONa ISsubstantial THATprobability of attaining competency THE DEFENDANT IS RESTORABLE ,AN, opiniontheCOMPETENCY asevaluator toshall specifically state whether inpatienttheMPETENCY restorationevaluator servicesbelieves arethere clinicallyareuniqueordifferentservicesoutsidethestandardcompetencyrestoration appropriatecurriculumdevelopedbythedepartment CDHSthatthedefendantmayneed in order to restorebe restored to competency within the defendantreasonably toforeseeable competency.future.

(f)(II) An IF THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR 'S OPINION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (5)(d)(I)(A)OF THIS SECTION IS THAT THE DEFENDANT IS RESTORABLE ,AN opinion as to whether thereinpatient isrestoration aservices substantialare probabilitythatclinically thedefendant,withrestorationservices,willattaincompetencywithintheappropriate reasonablyto foreseeablerestore future.the defendant to competency.

As(f) partAn ofopinion formingas theirto opinion,whether there is a substantial probability that the competencyevaluatorshalluseduediligenceinthereviewandsummarydefendant, ofwith anyrestoration priorservices, competencywill opinionsattain regardingcompetency within the defendant.reasonably foreseeable future.

As part of forming their opinion, the competencyevaluatorshalluseduediligenceinthereviewandsummaryof anyprior competencyopinions regarding the defendant.

(g) (e) The competency evaluator's opinion as to whether the defendantmeetsthecriteriaforatierIIER1ortierIITIER2designation;defendant meets the criteria for a tier I 1 or tier TIER2 designation;

PAGE 18-SENATE BILL 26-149 as defined in section 16-8.5-101 (19) and (20);

(h)(f) The competency evaluator's opinion and the(h)(f) Thecompetencyevaluator'sopinionandthe information and factors considered in making determinations as to whether the defendant:

(I) Meets the criteria for an emergencyemergencymental mental health hold -26- 149 pursuant to section 27-65-106;

(II) Meets the criteria for a certification for short-term treatment pursuanttosection27-65-108.5or27-65-109and,ifthedefendantmeetspursuant to section 27-65-108.5 or 27-65-109 and, if the defendant meets such THE criteria, whether thCOMPETENCYthe COMPETENCY evaluator believes the defendant could be treated on an outpatient basis pursuant to section 27-65-111.

I F THE DEFENDANT IS INCARCERATED OR IS INPATIENT IN A MEDICAL FACILITY AND HAS A PENDING CRIMINAL CHARGE , in assessing whether the defendant with a pending criminal chischargeis a danger to self orTHEor THE DEFENDANT S SEL,SELF, A DANGER TO others, or is gravelydisabled,gravely disabled, if the personpersonisincarcerated isASTHOSETERMSAREDEFINEDINSECTION incarcerated THOSE TERMS ARE DEFINED IN SECTION 27-65-102, theOURTthe COURT , competencyevaluator,competency evaluator, or professional person, as defined in sectionsection27-65-102,andthecourt 27-65-102,shallnotrelyonthefactthatthedefendant and the shall not rely on the fact that the defendant is incarcerated or is an inpatient in a medical facility to establish that the defendant is not a danger to self, or to others, or is notnotvelydisabled. OR gravelydisabled.

IfIfitistheCOMPETENCY itevaluator'sopinionthatthedefendantmeetscriteria iCOMPETENCYforcertificationforshort-termtreatmentpursuanttosection27-65-108.5or evaluator's27-65-109, opinion that the defendantmeetscriteriaforcertificationforshort-termtreatmentpursuantCOMPETENCY to section 27-65-108.5 or 27-65-109, thePETENCY evaluator is not required to request a petition for certification for short-term treatment of the defendant.

(III) Has an intellectual and developmental disability, as defined in section 25.5-10-202, and if the defendant does have such aANa AN INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL disability:

(A) WhetherWhetherthedefendant theALSOHASAMENTALHEALTHDISORDER defendant, ALSOAS HAS A MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION27-65-102,SECTION 27-65-102, AND ,IF THE DEFENDANT DOES HAVE A CO -OCCURRINGOCCURRING INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY AND A MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER ,THE PRIMARY DIAGNOSIS , -27- 149 IF DETERMINABLE;ANDDETERMINABLE (B); W HETHERTHEDEFENDANT maybeeligibleforanyadditional services pursuant to article 10 of title 25.5 or article 10.5 of title 27, MAY MEET THE CRITERIA FOR A CIVIL PROCEEDI;OR (IV) HAS A NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDER,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 25.5-10-501,AND IF THE DEFENDANT DOES HAVE A NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDER ,WHETHER THE DEFENDANT ALSO HAS A MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER AND WHETHER THE DEFENDANT MAY MEET THE CRITERIA FOR PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 25.5-10-502.F THE COMPETENCYEVALUATOR SOPINION IS THAT THE DEFENDANT MAYMEET THE CRITERIA FOR PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT , THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR IS NOT REQUIRED TO PETITION THE COURT FOR PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT .

(g)AND WHENTHECOMPETENCYEVALUATORHASREASONTOBELIEVE(B) W HETHER THE DEFENDANT HASmay Abe NEUROCOGNITIVEeligible DISORDERfor ,ASany DEFINEDadditional INservicespursuanttoarticle10oftitle25.5orarticle10.5oftitle27, SECTIONORMAY 25.5-10-501ORMEET THE CRITERIA FOR A DEVELOPMENTALCIVIL DISABILITY:PROCEEDING ;

(I)OR THEPAGE COMPETENCY19-SENATE EVALUATORBILL 'S26-149 OPINION(IV) H AS TOA WHETHERNEUROCOGNITIVE DIAGNOSTICDISORDER TESTING,AS EXISTSDEFINED BEYONDIN WHATSECTION THE25.5-10-501, COMPETENCYAND EVALUATORIF CANTHE PERFORMDEFENDANT THATDOES ISHAVE NECESSARYA TONEUROCOGNITIVE PROVIDEDISORDER AN, OPINION AS TO WHETHER THE DEFENDANT ISALSO INCOMPETENTHAS TOA PROCEEDMENTAL ORHEALTH RESTORABLEDISORDER ;AND,AND (II)WHETHER THE COMPETENCYDEFENDANT EVALUATORMAY 'SMEET OPINIONTHE ASCRITERIA TOFOR THEPROTECTIVE DEFENDANTPLACEMENT 'SPURSUANT PRIMARYTO DIAGNOSISSECTION AND25.5-10-502. PROGNOSI.

(6)IF WheneverTHE aCOMPETENCY competencyEVALUATOR evaluationS isOPINION orderedIS uponTHAT theTHE requestDEFENDANT ofMAY eitherMEET party,THECRITERIAFORPROTECTIVEPLACEMENT the,THECOMPETENCYEVALUATOR courtIS mayotifytheNOT countyattorneyorREQUIRED districtTO attorneyPETITION requiredTHE toCOURT conductFOR proceedingsPROTECTIVE pursuantPLACEMENT to. section 27-65-113 (6)ECTION 27-65-113.5 for the county in which the charges -28- 149 are pending, and the bridges court liaison hired or contracted pursuant to article 95 of title 13, of all court dates for return of the EVALUATION report.oncompetencytoensurethatallpartiesareonnotice of the expected need for coordinated services and planning with consideration of possible civil certification.

(7)(g) EachW courtHEN shall allow for any competency evaluation conductedpursuanttotheprovisionsofthissectionorsection16-8.5-106 THIS ARTICLE8.5 to be submitted to the court through electronic means, INCLUDING THROUGH AN E -FILING SYSTEM IF THE ORDER FOR THE COMPETENCY EVALUATIONEVALUATOR ISHAS ISSUEDREASON TO CDHSBELIEVE THROUGHTHEDEFENDANTHASANEUROCOGNITIVEDISORDER ANASDEFINEDINSECTION E25.5-10-501,OR -FILINGA SYSTEMDEVELOPMENTAL .DISABILITY :

(8)(I) ATHE competencyevaluatorCOMPETENCY isEVALUATOR not'S liableOPINION forAS damagesTO inWHETHER anycivilDIAGNOSTICTESTINGEXISTSBEYONDWHATTHECOMPETENCYEVALUATOR actionCANPERFORMTHATISNECESSARYTOPROVIDE forANOPINIONASTOWHETHER failureTHE toDEFENDANT warnIS orINCOMPETENT protectTO aPROCEED specificOR personRESTORABLE or;AND persons,(II) includingTHE thoseCOMPETENCY identifiableEVALUATOR by'S theirOPINION associationAS withTO aTHE specificDEFENDANT locationS orPRIMARY entity,DIAGNOSIS againstAND thePROGNOSIS violent. behavior of a defendant being evaluated by the competency evaluator, and any competency evaluator must not be held civilly liable for failure to predict suchhavior, except where WHEN the defendant has communicated to the competency evaluatoraseriousthreatofimminentphysicalviolenceagainstaspecific person or persons, including those identifiable by their association with a specific location or entity.

(6) Whenever a competencyevaluation is ordered upon the request of either party, the court mayLL notify the county attorney or district attorneyrequiredtoconductproceedingspursuanttosection27-65-113(6) SECTION 27-65-113.5 for the countyin which the charges are pending, and thebridgescourtliaisonhiredorcontractedpursuanttoarticle95oftitle13, of all court dates for return of theETENCY EVALUATION report.

on competencyto ensure that all parties are on notice of the expected need for coordinated services and planning with consideration of possible civil certification.

(7) Eachcourtshallallowforanycompetencyevaluationconducted pursuant to the provisions of this section or section 16-8.5-106HIS ARTICLE 8.5 to be submitted to the court through electronic means, INCLUDING THROUGH AN E FILING SYSTEM IF THE ORDER FOR THE COMPETENCY EVALUATION IS ISSUED TO CDHS THROUGH AN E -FILING SYSTEM .

(8) A competency evaluator is not liable for damages in any civil action for failure to warn or protect a specific person or persons, including PAGE 20-SENATE BILL 26-149 those identifiable by their association with a specific location or entity, against the violent behavior of a defendant being evaluated by the competencyevaluator,andany THE competencyevaluatormustnotbeheld civilly liable for failure to predict sucholent behavior, except where WHEN the defendant has communicated to the competency evaluator a serious threat of imminent physical violence against a specific person or persons, including those identifiable by their association with a specific location or entity.

(1) IfIfadefendantcommittedtothecustodyofthedepartment aCDHS defendantforACOMPETENCY committedevaluation,orforrestorationtreatment toSERVICES the,meets custody of the departmentconstitutional CDHSrequirements for Athe COMPETENCYadministration evaluation,of or for restoration treatment SERVICES,meetstheconstitutionalrequirementsfortheadministrationof -29- 149 involuntary medication, the defendant'sdefendant'streatingphysician treatingmaypetition physician may petition the court for an order requiring that the defendant accept the MEDICATIONtreatmentMEDICATION or, alternatively,alternatively,thatthemedicationbeforciblyadministeredtothedefendant. that the medication be forcibly administered to the defendant.

The departmentshall,department CDHS shall, prior to the hearing on the petition, deliver a copycopyofthepetitiontothecourtthatcommittedthedefendanttothecustody ofofthedepartment theCDHS,theprosecutingattorney,andthedefendant'slegal petitionrepresentationinthecriminalcase,ifsuch toLEGAL therepresentationexists,and courttothedefendantdirectlyifthedefendantdoesnothavelegalrepresentation. that committed the defendant to the custody of the department the prosecuting attorney, and the defendant's legal representation in the criminal case, if sLEGAL representation exists, and to the defendant directly if the defendant does not have legal representation.

(2) A petition for involuntary treatment must be heard inine court of the jurisdiction where the defendant is located The departmentdepartmentSHALL SHALL HEAR A PETITION FOR INVOLUNTARY MEDICATION .

CDHS shall promptly deliver a copycopyof of the order granting or denying the petition to the court that committed the defendant to the custody of the department CDHS,theprosecutingattorney,andthedefendant'slegalrepresentationCDHS, in the criminalprosecutingattorney,andthedefendant'slegalrepresentationinthecriminal case,case,ifsuch ifLEGAL suchALrepresentationexists,andtothedefendantdirectlyifthe representation exists, and to the defendant directly if the defendant does not have legal representation.

(3) IfthecommittingcourtelectstotransfervenueformedicationIf the committing court elects to transfer venue for medication hearings to the court of the jurisdiction where the defendant is locatedlocF AHEARINGFORADMINISTRATIONOFINVOLUNTARYMEDICATIONISHEARDAd I HEARING FOR ADMINISTRATION OF INVOLUNTARY MEDICATION IS HEARD IN A DIFFERENT COUNTY THAN THE COUNTY WHERE THE COMMITTING COURT IS LOCATED,LOCATED , the committing county shall reimburse the county where the PAGE 21-SENATE BILL 26-149 proceeding is heard for the reasonable costs incurred in conductingtheproceeding.Alternatively,thedistrictattorneyTYconducting ATTORNEY for the committingproceeding. county or in any county or any city and -30- 149 county having a population exceeding fifty thousand people, the county attorneyfor the committing county,prosecute the proceeding as the proponent of the physician's petition.

(4)Alternatively, Ifthe adistrict defendantattorney committedCOUNTY toATTORNEY thefor custody of the departmentcommitting CDHScounty for evaluation or for restorationtmentSERVICES is ordered by a court to accepteatmentMEDICATION as set forth in subsectionany (1)county ofor thisany sectioncity and iscounty subsequentlyhaving returneda topopulation jailexceeding forfifty pendingthousand courtpeople, proceedings, the county jailattorney mayfor require the defendantcommitting tocounty, continuemay toprosecute receive the sameproceeding court-orderedas treatment MEDICATION that was administered by the departmentproponent CDHSof before the defendantphysician's waspetition. discharged from inpatient care, or, alternatively, appropriate medical personnel provided by the jail may forcibly administer such THE court-ordered medication to the defendant.

(4) Ifadefendantcommittedtothecustodyofthedepartment CDHS forevaluationorforrestorationtreatment SERVICES isorderedbyacourtto accept treatment MEDICATION as set forth in subsection (1) of this section and is subsequently returned to jail for pending court proceedings, the county jail may require the defendant to continue to receive the same court-ordered treatment MEDICATION that was administered by the departmentCDHSbeforethedefendantwasdischargedfrominpatientcare, or, alternatively, appropriate medical personnel provided by the jail may forcibly administer suchTHE court-ordered medication to the defendant.

(1)(1)(a) (a)Exceptasotherwiseprovidedinthissubsection(1) ExceptSECTION as, otherwise provided in this subsection (1) SECTION, evidence acquired directly or indirectly for the first time from a communication derived from the defendant's mental processes during the coursecourseofacompetencyevaluationorinvoluntarymedicationproceedingis ofnot aadmissible competencyagainst evaluationthe ordefendant involuntaryon medicationthe proceedingisnotadmissibleagainstthedefendantontheissuesraisedbyissues raised by a plea of not guilty,guilty,or,iftheoffenseoccurredbeforeJuly1,1995,apleaofnotguiltyby or,reasonofimpairedmentalcondition.Such ifTHE theevidencemaybeadmissible offenseat occurredtrial beforeto July1,rebut 1995,evidence aintroduced pleaby the defendant of notthe guiltybyreasondefendant's mental condition to show incapacity of impairedthe defendant THE DEFENDANT 'S INCAPACITY to form a culpable mental condition.state;

Suchvidenceand, mayin besuchTHAT admissiblecase, atthe trialevidence tomay rebutonly evidencebe introducedconsidered by the defendanttrier of fact as bearing upon the defendant'squestion mentalof conditioncapacity to showform incapacitya ofculpable mental state, and the defendantjury THEshall DEFENDANTbe 'Sso INCAPACITYinstructed toat formthe arequest culpableof mentaleither state;party.

and,(b)(2) inEvidence suchTHATacquired case,directly or indirectly for the evidencefirst mayonlybetime consideredfrom bya thecommunication trierderived offrom factthe asdefendant's bearingmental uponprocesses during the questioncourse of capacitytoa formcompetency aevaluation culpableor mentalinvoluntary state,medication -31-proceedingisadmissibleatanysentencinghearingheldpursuanttosection 14918-1.3-1201 andfor thean juryoffense shallcharged beprior soto instructedJuly at1, the2020, requestor ofpursuant eitherto party.section 18-1.3-1302 for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or PAGE 22-SENATE BILL 26-149 pursuanttosection18-1.4-102onlytoprovetheexistenceorabsenceofany mitigating factor.

(b)(2)(c)(3) EvidenceIf acquiredthe directlydefendant ortestifies indirectlyon for the firstdefendant's timeown frombehalf aupon communicationthe derivedtrial fromof the defendant'sissues mentalraised processesby during the courseplea of not guilty or, for offenses that occurred before July 1, 1995, a competencyplea evaluationof ornot involuntaryguilty medicationby proceedingreason isof admissibleimpaired mental condition, or at anya sentencing hearing held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.3-1302 for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.4-10218-1.4-102, onlythis tosection provedoes thenot existencebar oranyevidence absenceused ofto anyimpeach mitigatingor factor.rebut the defendant's testimony.

(c)(3) If the defendant testifies on the defendant's own behalf upon the trial of the issuesraisedbythe plea of not guiltyor, for offenses that occurred before July 1, 1995, a plea of not guilty by reason of impaired mental condition, or at a sentencing hearing held pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201 for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.3-1302 for an offense charged prior to July 1, 2020, or pursuant to section 18-1.4-102, this section does not bar any evidence used to impeach or rebut the defendant's testimony.

(1) (a) A PARTY MUST REQUEST A COMPETENCY HEARING , RESTORABILITY HEARING ,OR RESTORATION HEARING WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS AFTER RECEIVING THE INITIAL OR UPDATED COURT ORDERED-ORDERED COMPETENCY EVALUATION REPORT ;EXCEPT THAT IF,IF A PARTY REQUESTS ASECONDEVALUATIONPURSUANTTOSECTIONA 16-8.5-111APARTYMUSTSECOND EVALUATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-111,A PARTY MUST REQUEST THE COMPETENCY HEARING ,RESTORABILITY, RESTORABILITY HEARING , OR RESTORATION HEARING WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS AFTER RECEIVING THE SECOND EVALUATION REPORT .

(b) (I) AEQUESTAREQUEST FOR A COMPETENCY HEARING IS GOVERNED BY -32- 149 SECTION 16-8.5-109.

(II) AREQUESTA REQUEST FOR A RESTORABILITY HEARING IS GOVERNED BY SECTION 16-8.5-113.

(III) AREQUESTA REQUEST FOR A RESTORATION HEARING IS GOVERNED BY SECTION 16-8.5-114.

(IV) A REQUESTREQUESTFORACOMBINEDRESTORABILITYANDRESTORATION FOR A COMBINED RESTORABILITY AND RESTORATION HEARING IS GOVERNED BY SECTIONS 16-8.5-113 AND 16-8.5-114.

(c) THET HE COURT SHALL GIVE THE NONMOVING PARTY AN OPPORTUNITY TO OBJECT AND SHALL GRANT OR DENY THE REQUEST FOR A COMPETENCY HEARING ,RESTORABILITY, RESTORABILITY HEARING , OR RESTORATION HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE GOVERNING STATUTES WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS AFTER THE REQUEST .

PAGE 23-SENATE BILL 26-149 (d) T HE COMPETENCY HEARING ,RESTORABILITY HEARING ,OR RESTORATIONRESTORATIONHEARINGMUSTBEHELDWITHINTHIRTY HEARING-FIVEDAYSAFTERTHE MUST BE HELD WITHIN THIRTY -FIVE DAYS AFTER THE COURT S'SORDERGRANTINGTHEREQUEST ORDER,UNLESSTHETIMEISEXTENDEDBY GRANTING THE REQUEST , UNLESS THE TIME IS EXTENDED BY THE COURT AFTER A FINDING OF GOOD CAUSE .

(2)(2)(a)[Formerly (a)16-8.5-110]Inany [FormerlyA 16-8.5-110]TACOMPETENCY InanyThearing,at ACOMPETENCYwhichthecompetencyofthedefendantisanissue hearing,RESTORABILITYHEARING at, whichOR the competency of the defendant is an isRESTORABILITY HEARING ,OR RESTORATION HEARING , witnesses not speciallyspeciallytrained trained in psychiatrypsychiatryor or psychology and not testifying as expert witnesses may testifyastothewitness'sHEIRobservationofthedefendant'sactionsandtestify conduct and as to conversationsthe thatwitness'sTHEIR observation of the witnessEYdefendant's hadactions withand theconduct defendantand bearingas upontoconversationsthatthewitnessTHEY hadwiththedefendantbearingupon the defendant's mental condition.

Any such witnesses, as part of the witness'stestimony,witness's THEIR testimony, must be permitted to giveopinionsorconclusionsconcerningthecompetencyofthedefendant.give opinions or conclusions concerning the competency of the defendant.

(b) [Formerly 16-8.5-109 (3)] The court may examine or -33- 149 cross-examine any witness WITNESSES called by the defendant or prosecuting attorney at a competency hearingdhearing and may summon and examine witnesses on the court's own motion.

(3) [Formerly 16-8.5-109 (2)] At a competency hearing, RESTORABILITYRESTORABILITYHEARING HEARING,ORRESTORATIONHEARING ,OR,thedefendantandthe RESTORATION HEARING , the defendant and the prosecuting attorney are entitled:

(b) ToexamineanyreportsofthecompetencyevaluationorotherTo examine any reports of the competency evaluation or other matter to be considered by the court as bearing upon the determination;

(4)[Formerly(4) [Formerly 16-8.5-108 (2)]InanyATACOMPETENCY(2)] In any T A COMPETENCY hearing, concerning competency to proceed or restoration to competency RESTORABILITY HEARING , OR RESTORATION HEARING , competency evaluatorsevaluatorsandotherexpertsmaytestifyasto and other experts may testify as to the conclusions reachedreachedfrom from their examination of hospital records, laboratory reports, X rays, electroencephalograms,andpsychologicaltestresultselectroencephalograms,andpsychologicaltestresultsifthematerialthatthe ifPAGE thematerialthat24-SENATE theBILL 26-149 COMPETENCY evaluatorsevaluatorsorexpertsexaminedinreachingtheirconclusions or experts examined in reaching their conclusions is produced at the time of the hearing.

Nothing ininis section preventsDOESprevents DOES NOT PREVENT the parties from obtaining the information authorized byRSUANTby PURSUANT TO section 16-8.5-104 prior to the hearing.

(5) [Formerly 16-8.5-114 (3)] Evidence of any determination as to the defendant's competency, or incompetencyESTORABILITY,incompetency RESTORABILITY , OR RESTORATION is not admissible on the issues raised by a plea of not guilty, not guilty by reason of insanity, or, for offenses that occurred -34-before 149July beforeJuly1,1995,theaffirmativedefenseofimpairedmentalcondition.1, 1995, the affirmative defense of impaired mental condition.

Competency hearing - procedure after determinationofcompetencyorincompetency-mandatorydismissaldetermination of competency or incompetency - mandatory dismissal - refile of charges.

(a) IFI F A PARTY MAKES A TIMELY REQUEST FOR A COMPETENCY HEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-108,THE COURT SHALLSHALLGRANT GRANT THE REQUEST FOR A COMPETENCY HEARING .

(b) [Formerly 16-8.5-103 (7)] At anyCOMPETENCYanyACOMPETENCY hearing, held pursuant to this section,artyassertingsection, the incompetencyofparty theasserting defendant shall haveAS the burdenincompetency of submittingthe evidencedefendantshallhave andHAS thetheburdenofsubmittingevidenceandtheburden burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.

(2)[Formerly16-8.5-111(1)](2) Competenttoproceed.Ifthefinal[Formerly determination16-8.5-111 made(1)] pursuantCompetent to sectionproceed. 16-8.5-103 is that the defendant is competent to proceed, the judgeT shall order that the suspended proceeding continue or, if a mistrial was declared, shall resetthe case for trial at the earliest possible date.

(3)If [Formerlythe 16-8.5-111final (1.5)]determination Referralmade pursuant to wraparoundsection care16-8.5-103 programis orthat restorationthe services.defendant is competent to proceed, the judge COURT shall order that the suspended proceeding continue or, if a mistrial was declared, shall reset the case for trial at the earliest possible date.

If(3) the[Formerly final16-8.5-111 determination(1.5)] madeReferral pursuant to sectionwraparound 16-8.5-103care isprogramorrestorationservices.Ifthefinaldeterminationmadepursuant thattosection16-8.5-103isthatthedefendantisincompetenttoproceedandthe the defendant is incompetent to proceed and the defendant is eligible for referral to the bridges wraparound care programpursuantprogram pursuant to article 8.6 of this title 16, the court maymayask ask the parties whether the defendant should be referred for participation in the program.

With the agreement of the parties, the court may delay ordering restoration services forforthedefendanttoallowabridgeswraparoundcarecoordinatortoconduct thePAGE defendant25-SENATE toBILL allow26-149 a bridges wraparound care coordinator to conduct an initial intake of the defendant pursuant to section 16-8.6-108 to determine whether the -35- 149 bridges wraparound care programprogramis is appropriate for thethedefendant,or, defendant,EXCEPTASPROVIDEDINSUBSECTION or,(4)OFTHISSECTION EXCEPT, AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION(4)OF THIS SECTIO, the court may order restoration services pursuant to subsection (2) of this section SECTION 16-8.5-110.

(4)[Formerly16-8.5-111(1.6)]Mandatorydismissalofcertain(4) [Formerly 16-8.5-111 (1.6)] Mandatory dismissal of certain charges after finding of incompetency.

(a) THET HE COURT SHALL DISMISS THE CHARGES AGAINST THE DEFENDANT if the final determination made pursuant totosection16-8.5-103 section 16-8.5-103 is that the defendant is incompetent to proceed and if a defendant's highest charged offense is a class 2 misdemeanor;

ortrafficor a traffic offense, the court shall dismiss thechargesagainstthedefendantunlessthedistrictattorneyobjectspriorthe charges against the defendant unless the district attorney objects prior to the entryofentry of the order to dismiss and makes a prima facie showing that the defendant is a danger to the defendant's self or others or is gravelygravelydisabled disabled and there is a reasonable belief that the defendant will be certified for treatment and receivereceivethenecessaryservicespursuanttoarticle65oftitle27 theINFRACTION necessary; services pursuant to article 65 of title 27ACTION;A MISDEMEANOR TRAFFIC OFFENSE ;AN OFFENSE THAT CONSTITUTES AN UNCLASSIFIED MISDEMEANOR WITHOUT SPECIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION18-1.3-504;OR AN OFFENSE THAT CONSTITUTES A DENOMINATED MISDEMEANOR AND NO PENALTY IS FIXED INSTATUTEPURSUANTTOSECTION 18-1.3-505BUTNOTAMISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO PART 13 OF ARTICLE 4 OF TITLE 42 OR ANY OFFENSE CHARGED PURSUANT TO SECTION 42-4-1402 (2)(c).

(b)A IfthedistrictattorneymakestheprimafacieshowingpursuantMISDEMEANOR toTRAFFIC subsectionOFFENSE (1.6)(a);AN ofOFFENSE thisTHAT section,CONSTITUTES theAN courtUNCLASSIFIED shallMISDEMEANOR proceedWITHOUT pursuantSPECIFICATION toPURSUANT subsectionTO (3)SECTION of18-1.3-504; this section or section 16-8.5-116.5 (7) and, upon completionofthecertificationprocess,thecourtshalldismissthecharges -36- 149 against the defendant.

(c)OR IfAN theOFFENSE courtTHAT doesCONSTITUTES notA referDENOMINATED theMISDEMEANORANDNOPENALTYISFIXEDINSTATUTEPURSUANTTOSECTION defendant18-1.3-505, forBUT certificationNOT pursuantA toMISDEMEANOR subsectionPURSUANT (3)TO ofPART this13 sectionOF orARTICLE section4 16-8.5-116.5OF (7),TITLE the42 courtOR mayANY referOFFENSE theCHARGED defendantPURSUANT toTO voluntarilySECTION participate42-4-1402 and(2)(c). receive services in the court liaison program pursuant to article 95 of title 13.

(b) If the district attorney makes the prima facie showing pursuant to subsection (1.6)(a) of this section, the court shall proceed pursuant to subsection (3) of this section or section 16-8.5-116.5 (7) and, upon completion of the certification process, the court shall dismiss the charges against the defendant.

(c) Ifthecourtdoesnotreferthedefendantforcertificationpursuant to subsection (3) of this section or section 16-8.5-116.5 (7), the court may refer the defendant to voluntarily participate and receive services in the court liaison program pursuant to article 95 of title 13.

(1)[Formerly16-8.5-111(2)]Orderforrestorationservices.IfPAGE the26-SENATE finalBILL determination26-149 made(1) pursuant[Formerly to16-8.5-111 section(2)] 16-8.5-103Order isfor that the defendant is incompetent to proceed, andESS the court finds there is substantial probability thatTER A RESTORABILITY HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-113THAT the defendant with restoration services,services. will attain competency in the reasonably foreseeablISfuture UNRESTORABLE , the court has the following requirements and options:

(a) If the defendantfinal isdetermination outmade ofpursuant custodyorto willsection be16-8.5-103 releasedis soon,that the courtshallordertherestorationservicestakeplaceonanoutpatientbasis,defendant unlessis theincompetent recommendationto fromproceed, and UNLESS the departmentHScourt finds there is substantial probability that inpatientAFTER A RESTORABILITY HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-113 THAT the defendant with restoration servicesservices, arewill clinicallyattain appropriate,competency and:in the reasonably foreseeable future IS UNRESTORABLE , the court has the following requirements and options:

(I)(a) TheIf the defendant is out of custody or will be released soon, the court shall order thattheestoration services take place on an outpatient basis, unless the defendantrecommendation participatefrom inthe restorationdepartment servicesCDHS asis athat conditioninpatient ofrestoration anyservices bond;are clinically appropriate, and:

(II)(I) TheThecourtshallorderthatthedefendantparticipateinrestoration courtservices mayas appoint a bridgescondition courtof liaisonREDany ORbond; CONTRACTEDPURSUANTTOARTICLE 95 OFTITLE13 or mayorder that the defendantcooperatewithpretrialservices,ifavailable,andthecourtmay orderpretrialservicesorabridgescourtliaison,orboth,toworkwiththe defendant, the departmentDHS, and the restoration services provider under contract with the department CDHS to assist in securing appropriate support and care management services for the defendant, which may include housing resources;

and(II) -37-The 149court (III)may Theappoint a bridges court shallliaison conductHIRED OR CONTRACTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 95 OF TITLE 13 or may order that the defendant cooperate with pretrial services, if available, and the court may order pretrial services or a nonappearancebridges reviewcourt fourteenliaison, daysor afterboth, to work with the defendant'sdefendant, releasethe fromdepartment custodyCDHS, and the restoration services provider under contract with the department CDHS to ensureassist in securing appropriate support and care management services for the defendantdefendant, haswhich beenmay released.include housing resources;

Ifand the(III) defendantThe iscourt notshall releasedconduct byanonappearancereview thefourteen datedays ofafter the nonappearancereview,thecourtshallsetahearingtodeterminewhetherdefendant's therelease defendantfromcustodyto willensure bethe releaseddefendant orhas tobeen enterreleased. an order pursuant to subsection (2)(c)SUBSECTION (1)(c) of this section.

(b) If the court determines the defendant is incompetentnot toreleased proceedby andthe DEFENDANTdate isof in-custodythe onCLASSnonappearance 1review,thecourtshallsetahearingtodeterminewhetherthedefendantwill misdemeanor,be pettyreleased offense, or trafficto offenseISDEMEANORenter DESCRIBEDan INorder PARTpursuant 13to OFsubsection ARTICLE(2)(c)BSECTION 4(1)(c) OFof TITLE42,ORthis ANsection. OFFENSE CHARGED PURSUANT TO SECTION 42-4-1402 (2)(c), the court mustALL set a hearing on bond within seven days after the court's final determination that the defendant is incompetent to proceed.

At(b) If the bondcourt hearing,determines therethe defendant is aincompetent presumptionto thatproceed theand courtDEFENDANT shallderis in-custodyon a personalCLASS recognizance1 bondmisdemeanor, andpettyoffense, enteror antraffic orderoffenseA forMISDEMEANOR restorationDESCRIBED servicesIN pursuantPART to13 subsectionOF (2)(a)TIONARTICLE (1)(a)4 ofOF thissection.InordertoTITLE denythedefendantapersonalrecognizancebond42,ORANOFFENSECHARGEDPURSUANTTOSECTION and42-4-1402(2)(c), enterthe ancourt ordermust toSHALL commitset thea defendanthearing foron inpatientbond restorationwithin servicesseven pursuantdays toafter subsectionthe (2)(c)CTIONcourt's (1)(c)final ofdeterminationthatthedefendantisincompetenttoproceed.At thisthebondhearing,thereisapresumptionthatthecourtshall section,orderapersonal therecognizance courtbond shalland MUSTenter makean findingsorder offor factrestoration thatservices extraordinarypursuant circumstancesto existPAGE to27-SENATE overcomeBILL the26-149 presumptionsubsection of(2)(a) releaseSUBSECTION byclear(1)(a) andof convincingthis evidence.section.

IfIn theorder courtto deniesdeny the defendant a personal recognizance bond,bond thecourtmustand SHALLenter notifythedepartmentCDHSofthespecificfindingsan order to commit the courtdefendant madefor inpatient restoration services pursuant to denysubsection (2)(c) SUBSECTION (1)(c) of this section, the personalcourt recognizanceshaMUST bond.make findings of factthatextraordinarycircumstancesexisttoovercomethepresumptionof release by clear and convincing evidence.

TheIf judicialthe departmentcourt shalldenies develop a formpersonal forrecognizance abond, the court tomust useSHALL to notify the department CDHS of the court'sspecific findings thatthe arecourt requiredmade byto thisdeny subsectionthe (2)(b)UBSECTIONpersonal (1)(b).recognizance bond.

(c)The Ifjudicial thedepartment courtshall findsdevelop thata theform defendant is not eligible for release -38- 149 from custody or not able to post the monetary condition of bond, or the court approves a recommendation from the department CDHS that inpatient restoration services are clinically appropriate, the court shallto commituse the defendant to thenotifythedepartment custodyCDHSofthecourt'sfindingsthatarerequiredbythis ofsubsection the(2)(b) departmentndSUBSECTION order(1)(b). inpatient restoration services.

(c) If the court finds that the defendant is not eligible for release from custody or not able to post the monetary condition of bond, or the courtapprovesarecommendationfromthedepartment CDHSthatinpatient restoration services are clinically appropriate, the court shall commit the defendant to the custody of the department CDHS and order inpatient restoration services.

(a) If the defendant is out of custody and the court has ordered OUTPATIENT restorationrestorationservicespursuanttosubsection(2)(a) services pursuant to subsection (2)(a) SUBSECTION (1)(a) of this section:

(I) PursuantPursuanttosection27-60-105,thedepartment toCDHSistheentity section 27-60-105, the departmentis the entity responsible for the coordination of all competency restoration services, including the oversight of restoration eANDation;education;AND (II) The restoration services provider under contract with the departmentCDHSshallnotifythecourt,thedepartmentCDHS,thebridges courtliaison,andanyotherdesignatedagencywithintwenty-onedaysafter the court's order if restoration services have not started and include a description of the efforts that have been made to engage the defendant in services.

(II)and The(III) If the department determines that the department is unable, within a reasonable time, to provide restoration services provideron underan contractoutpatient withbasis, the department CDHS shall notify the court,court thewithin departmentfourteen CDHS,days after the bridgescourtliaison,andanyotherdesignatedagencywithintwenty-onedepartment's daysdetermination, afterat which point the court'scourt ordershall ifreview restorationthe servicescase havePAGE not28-SENATE startedBILL 26-149 and includedetermine awhat descriptioninterim ofmental health services the effortsdepartment thator havea beencommunityprovidercanprovidetothedefendant.If madeabridgescourtliaison is appointed, the department shall report to engagethe bridges court liaison every twenty-eight days concerning the defendantavailability inof services.restoration services on an outpatient basis to the defendant.

and(b) (III)If, Ifin the departmentprocess determinesof thatcoordinating theoutpatient departmentrestoration isservices unable,foradefendant,thedepartment withinCDHSdeterminesthatthedefendantmeets the standard for a reasonablecertification time,for short-term treatment pursuant to providesection restoration27-65-108.5 servicesand onthat initiating a petition for an outpatient basis,certification is appropriate, the department shallCRITERIA notifytheFOR courtTHE withinINITIATION fourteenOF daysA afterCIVIL thePROCEEDING department'sdetermination,atwhichpointthecourtshallreviewthecase,CDHS andmayrequest, determinein whatwriting, interimthat mentalthe healthcourt servicesrefer the departmentmatter orfor filing of a communitypetition providerfor canshort-term providetreatment pursuant to 27-65-108.5 in a court with jurisdiction and authorize the defendant.department to file the petition.

IfAfter receiving a bridgeswritten courtrequest, liaisonthe iscourt appointed,shall thehear departmentand shallconsider reportany toobjections from the bridgesdefendant courtprior liaisonto everytwenty-eightruling dayson concerning the availabilityofrequest restorationORDER servicesTHE onINITIATION anOF outpatientA basisCIVIL toPROCEEDING thePURSUANT defendant.TO SECTION 16-8.5-117.

-39-(c) 149If (b) If, in the process of coordinating outpatient restoration services for a defendant, the department CDHS determines that the defendantdepartment meetsIT theis standardunable, forwithin a certificationreasonable fortime, short-term treatment pursuant to sectionprovide 27-65-108.5restoration andservices thaton initiatingan aoutpatientbasis,thedepartment petitionCDHSshallnotifythecourtwithinfourteen fordaysafterthedepartment's anITS outpatientdetermination,atwhichpointthecourtshall certificationreview is appropriate, the departCRITERIAcase FORand THEdetermine INITIATIONwhat OFinterim Amental CIVILhealth PROCEEDINGservices , CDHS may request, in writing, that the courtdepartment referCDHS theor matter for filing of a petitioncommunity forprovider short-termcan treatmentprovide pursuant to 27-65-108.5 in a court with jurisdiction and authorize the departmenttofilethepetition.Afterreceivingawrittenrequest,thecourtdefendant. shall hear and consider anyobjections from the defendant prior to ruling on the requestORDER THE INITIATION OF A CIVIL PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-117.

(c) If thea departmentDHSbridges determinescourt thatliaisonisappointed,thedepartment theCDHSshallreportto departmentthebridgescourtliaisoneverytwenty-eightdaysconcerningtheavailability ITisof unable, within a reasonable time, to provide restoration services on an outpatient basis,basis the departmentCDHS shall notify the court within fourteendaysafterthedepartment's ITSdetermination,atwhichpointthe court shall review the case and determine what interim mental health services the departmentCDHS or a community provider can provide to the defendant.

If a bridges court liaison is appointed, the department CDHS shall report to the bridges court liaison every twenty-eight days concerning the availability of restoration services on an outpatient basis to the defendant.

(I) TheTheexecutivedirectorshalldesignateastatefacilityorfacilities executive director shall designate a state facility or facilities where the defendant is held for care and psychiatric treatment -40- 149 and receives restoration services, aTHEandTHE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR may EFFECTUATETHEDEFENDANTEFFECTUATE THE DEFENDANT S transferthedefendantfromonefacilitytotransfer the defendant from one facility to another if, in the opinion of theUTIVEtheEXECUTIVE director, doing so is in the bestinterestofpropercare,custody,andtreatmentofthedefendantorthebest protectioninterest of theproper publiccare,custody,andtreatmentof thedefendantortheprotectionofthepublic or the personnel of the facilities in question.

The departmentdepartmentHS CDHS shall PAGE 29-SENATE BILL 26-149 provide restoration services at an appropriate inpatient program.

The departmentCDHSdepartment CDHS shall notify the court, the bridges court liaison, the prosecutingprosecutingattorney,andthedefenseattorneywhenthedefendantisplaced attorney, and the defense attorney when the defendant is placed or moved to a different program.

(II) The department CDHS shall admit tier 1 defendants for INPATIENTrestorationserviceswithinsevendaysafterreceiptofthecourtINPATIENT restoration services within seven days after receipt of the court order and collateral materials;

(III) The department CDHS shall admit tier 2 defendants for INPATIENT restorationrestorationserviceswithintwenty-eight services within twenty-eight days afterafterreceiptof receipt of the court order and collateral materials and shall advise the court and the bridges court liaison, if applicable, everyeverytwenty-eight twenty-eight days after the initial twenty-eight-day period regarding the availability of an inpatient bed and when admission will be offered to the defendant.

(I) Aless-restrictivefacilitywouldbemoreclinicallyappropriate,A theexecutivedirector,withpropernoticetothecourtandconsistentwithless-restrictive thefacility provisionswould ofbe partmore 3clinically ofappropriate, articlethe 4.1executive ofdirector, titlewith 24,proper maymovenotice to the defendantcourt toand aconsistent less-restrictivewith facilitythe if,provisions inof thepart executive3 director'sof opinion,article the4.1 defendantisnotyetrestoredtocompetencybutcouldbeproperlyrestoredof tocompetencyinaless-restrictivefacility.Ifthedefendantisnotreleasedtitle from24, custody,maymove the courtdefendant shallto orderaless-restrictivefacilityif,intheexecutivedirector'sopinion,thedefendant theis departmentHSnot yet restored to providecompetency -41-but 149could inpatientRESTORATIONbe servicesproperly atrestored ato locationcompetency determinedin bya theless-restrictive departmentCDHS.facility.

(II)If Outpatientthe restorationdefendant servicesis wouldnot bereleased morefrom clinicallycustody, appropriate, the departmentHScourt shall (A)order notifythethe court;department CDHS to provide inpatientRESTORATION servicesatalocationdeterminedbythedepartment CDHS.

and(II) requestthatOutpatient therestoration defendantservices would be consideredmore forclinically releaseappropriate, onthe adepartment nonmonetaryCDHS bondshall if(A) thenotifythecourt;andrequestthatthedefendantbeconsideredfor defendantrelease ison nota currentlynonmonetarybondif releasedthedefendantisnotcurrentlyreleased on bond;

and (B) provide to the court informatTOinformationTO THE COURT regarding the appropriateoutpatientrestorationservices,developedinconjunctionwithappropriate theoutpatient bridgesrestoration courtservices, liaison,developed whenin assigned,conjunction andwith thethebridgescourtliaison,whenassigned,andthereasonswhythedefendant reasons why the defendant could be properly restored to competency on an outpatient basis.

PAGE 30-SENATE BILL 26-149 (c) If the defendant posts bond or the court orders outpatient restorationservicesinlieuofrestorationservicesinlieuofcontinuedinpatient continuedinpatientSTORATIONRESTORATION services,services,or or if the departmentDHSdepartment CDHS believes that the defendant is restored to competency and the defendant is to be released to the community rather than jail upon discharge, the departmentSdepartmentCDHS shall:

(II) ProvidethenecessarycaseandmedicationinformationfortheProvide defendanttothebridgescourtliaisonandthecommunityagencythatwillthe necessary case and medication information for the defendant to the bridges court liaison and the community agency that will provide continued restoration, if applicable, or services;

(III) NotifyNotifythecourtandthebridgescourtliaisonthatthedefendant the court and the bridges court liaison that the defendant was released and the defendant's community bond status;

and (IV) Coordinatewiththecourt;pretrialservices,ifapplicable;andCoordinate thewith bridges court liaison to ensure the defendantcourt; receives written notice of the defendant's next court appearance and bond conditions.

(d)pretrial Ifservices, theif defendantapplicable; is discharged from the department's S -42- 149 custodyafterreceivinginpatientrestorationservicesandthedefendantis to be returned to the custody of the county jail, the department shall:

(I)and Notifythethe sheriffbridges ofcourt theliaison jurisdictionto whereensure the defendant isreceives towritten benotice returned;of the defendant's next court appearance and bond conditions.

(II)(d) NotifyIf the courtdefendant andis discharged from the bridgesdepartment's courtCDHS' liaisonS thatcustodyafterreceivinginpatientrestorationservicesandthedefendantisto be returned to the departmentCDHSisreturningthedefendanttothecustodyofcustody thecountyof jail;the county jail, the departmentDHS shall:

and(I) (III)Notifythe Worksheriff withof thethejurisdictionwherethedefendantis sheriff, the bridges court liaison, and any behavioralhealthprovidersinthecountyjailtoensurethatthecountyjail has the necessary information to preventbe anyreturned; decompensation by the defendant while the defendant is in the county jail, which must include medication information when clinically appropriate.

(II) Notifythecourtandthebridgescourtliaisonthatthedepartment CDHS is returning the defendant to the custody of the county jail;

and (III) Work with the sheriff, the bridges court liaison, and any behavioral health providers in the county jail to ensure that the county jail has the necessary information to prevent any decompensation by the defendant while the defendant is in the county jail, which must include medication information when clinically appropriate.

(1)(1)[Formerly16-8.5-106(1)]Ifadefendantwishestobeexamined [Formerlyby 16-8.5-106a (1)]competency Ifevaluator aof defendanthis wishesor toher beTHE examinedbyacompetencyevaluatorofDEFENDANT hisorherS THEDEFENDANTown 'Sown choice in connection with anyproceedingany proceeding under this article8.5,article ARTICLE 8.5, the court, uponPAGE timely31-SENATE motion,BILL shall26-149 orderupontimelymotion,shallorderthat thatRENTERANYORDERSNECESSARYFOR ANYthe ORDERScompetency NECESSARYFORevaluator thecompetencyevaluatorchosenbythedefendantTOchosen by the defendant TO be given reasonable opportunityopportunitytoconductthe toAsecondevaluation.inaccordancewithsections conduct16-8.5-103 theecondand evaluation.16-8.5-111.

in(2) accordanceEITHER withPARTY sectionsHAS 16-8.5-103THE andRIGHT 16-8.5-111.TO REQUEST A SECOND EVALUATION WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS AFTER RECEIVING THE INITIAL OR UPDATED COURT -ORDERED COMPETENCY EVALUATION REPORT , AND THE COURTSHALLGRANTTHEREQUEST .THESECONDEVALUATIONREPORTMUST INCLUDE THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR 'S OPINION , IF APPLICABLE , REGARDING :

(2)(a) EITHERW PARTYHETHER HAS THE RIGHTDEFENDANT TOIS REQUESTCOMPETENT ATO SECONDPROCEED EVALUATION WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS AFTER RECEIVING THE INITIAL OR UPDATEDINCOMPETENT COURTTO -ORDEREDCOMPETENCYEVALUATIONREPORTPROCEED ,AND; THE COURT SHALL GRANT THE REQUEST .

(b) W HETHER THE SECONDDEFENDANT EVALUATIONIS REPORTRESTORABLE MUST;AND INCLUDE(c) IF THE COMPETENCYDEFENDANT EVALUATORIS SRECEIVING OPINIO,IFRESTORATION APPLICABL,SERVICES REGARDING, :WHETHER THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN RESTORED TO COMPETENCY .

-43-(3) 149IARESTORATIONHEARINGISCOMBINEDWITHARESTORABILITY (a)HEARING W, HETHEREITHER THEPARTY DEFENDANTMAY ISREQUEST COMPETENTA TOSECOND PROCEEDEVALUATION ORTHAT INCOMPETENTADDRESSES TOBOTH PROCEEDRESTORATION ;AND RESTORABILITY RATHER THAN A SECOND EVALUATION FOR EACH ISSUE .

(b)(4) W[Formerly HETHER16-8.5-103 THE(4)] DEFENDANTIf ISa RESTORABLE;ANDparty (c)requests Ia THEsecond DEFENDANTevaluation,HECOURTSHALLCONTINUE ISanypendingrequestsforahearing RECEIVINGmust RESTORATIONbe SERVICES,continued WHETHERuntil THEthe DEFENDANTreceipt HASof BEENthe RESTOREDsecond TOevaluation COMPETENCYreport. .

(3)The IFCOMPETENCY AEVALUATOR RESTORATIONSHALL HEARINGCOMPLETE ISAND COMBINEDFILE WITHTHE Areport RESTORABILITYof HEARINGthe ,expert EITHERconducting PARTYthe MAYsecond REQUESTevaluation Amust SECONDbe EVALUATIONcompleted THATand ADDRESSESfiled BOTHwith RESTORATIONthe ANDcourt RESTORABILITYwithin RATHERthirty-five THANdays Aafter SECONDthe EVALUATIONcourt FORorder EACHallowing ISSUE.the second evaluation, unless the time period is extended by the court for good cause.

(4)ThecourtshallprovidethesecondevaluationtoCDHS [FormerlyAND 16-8.5-103theparties.and (4)] If a party requests a second evaluation,THE COURT SHALL CONTINUE any pending requests for a hearing must be continueuntil the receiptdepartment. of the second evaluation report.

TheCOMPETENCYThe EVALUATORdepartment SHALLCDHS COMPLETEshall ANDuse FILEthe THEsecond reportevaluation ofto ensure that the expertdepartment conductingCDHS thesecondevaluationmustcomplies bewith completedits andresponsibilities, filedwithincluding thereviewing courtand withinsummarizing thirty-fiveprior dayscompetency afteropinions theas courtrequired orderby allowingthesecondsection evaluation,16-8.5-105 unless(5)(f) theMADE timeperiodisextendedbythePURSUANT courtTO forSECTION good16-8.5-105 cause.(5)(d)(I)(A).

TheIf courtCOURT shallREQUESTS provideTHE second evaluation, is requested by the secondcourt, evaluationit tomust CDHSbe ANDpaid for by the parties.court.

PAGE 32-SENATE BILL 26-149 (5) [Formerly 16-8.5-107] In all proceedings brought pursuant to this article 8.5, the court shall appoint a competency evaluator or an attorney for the defendant at the state's expense upon motion of the defendant with proof that the defendant is indigent and without money to employ a competency evaluator or attorney to which the department.defendant is entitled pursuant to this article 8.5.

The departmentcourt CDHS shall usepay thefor a second evaluation toif ensurea thatsecond theevaluation deCDHSis compliesrequested with its responsibilities, including reviewing and summarizing prior competency opinions as required by sectionan 16-8.5-105indigent (5)(f)defendant. PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-105 (5)(d)(I)(A).

ICOURT(6) REQUESTSONCE THE secondCOURT evaluation,RECEIVES isTHE requestedSECOND byEVALUATION theREPORT court,, itEITHER mustPARTY beHAS paidTHE forRIGHT byTO theREQUEST court.A COMPETENCY HEARING , RESTORABILITY HEARING , OR RESTORATION HEARING ,AS APPLICABLE , PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-108 (1).

(5)[Formerly16-8.5-112. 16-8.5-107]Inallproceedingsbroughtpursuantto this article 8.5, the court shall appoint a competency evaluator or an attorney for the defendant at the state's expense upon motion of the -44- 149 defendantwithproof thatthedefendantisindigentandwithoutmoneyto employ a competency evaluator or attorney to which the defendant is entitled pursuant to this article 8.5.ourt shall pay for a second evaluation if a second evaluation is requested by an indigent defendant.

(6)[Formerly OCETHECOURTRECEIVESTHESECONDEVALUATIONREPORT16-8.5-116] ,Review EITHERhearing PARTYto HASdetermine THEcompetency RIGHT- TOreport. REQUEST A COMPETENCY HEARING , RESTORABILITY HEARING ,OR RESTORATION HEARING ,AS APPLICABLE , PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-108 (1).

16-8.5-112.[Formerly16-8.5-116]Reviewhearingtodetermine competency - report.

(2) (a(1)(a) (1) (a) Within ninety-one days after the entryofentry of the court's orderoforder commitmentorordertoreceiveoutpatientrestorationSERVICES,of commitment or order to receive outpatient restorationERVICES , the court shallTshallET A HEARING TOreviewTO review the case of a defendant who has beenbeendeterminedtobeincompetenttoproceedwithregardtotheprobability determinedthat toWHETHER be incompetent to proceed with regard to the probability thatHETHER the defendant will be restored to competency within the reasonably foreseeable futurefutureIS IS RESTORABLE OR UNRESTORABLE and with regard to the justification for certification, confinement, or continued restoratitreatmentSERVICES.restoration treatment SERVICES .

The review HEARING may be held in conjunction with a RESTORABILITY HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-113OR16-8.5-113 OR A restoration hearing held pursuant to section 16-8.5-113CTION16-8.5-113 SECTION 16-8.5-114.However,ifatthereviewhearingthereisarequestby the defendant for a restoration hearing pursuant to section 16-8.5-113 SECTION 16-8.5-114, the court shall set the restoration hearing within thirty-five days after the request pursuant to the provisions of section 16-8.5-113 SECTION 16-8.5-114.

However,(b) ifAt atleast theten reviewdays hearingbefore thereeach isreviewARING a, request by the defendantindividual foror aentityevaluatingthedefendant restorationCOMPETENCYEVALUATOR hearingshallprovidethe pursuant to section 16-8.5-113CTION 16-8.5-114, the court shallwith seta thereport restorationdescribingHAT hearingINCLUDES within: thirty-five days after the request pursuant to the provisions of section 16-8.5-113ON 16-8.5-114.

(b)(I) AtAn leastTHE tenCOMPETENCY daysEVALUATOR before'S eachopinion reviewNGregarding , the individualdefendant's -45-competency; 149 orentityevaluatingthedefendanCOMPETENCYEVALUATOR shallprovide the court with a report describing INCLUDES :

(I)PAGE An33-SENATE THEBILL COMPETENCY26-149 EVALUATOR(II)FTHECOMPETENCYEVALUATOROPINESTHATTHEDEFENDANT SREMAINS opinionINCOMPETENT regarding, whether there is a substantial probability that the defendant'sdefendantwillberestoredtocompetencywithinthereasonablyforeseeable competency;futureIS RESTORABLE OR UNRESTORABLE ;

(II)(III) IIHECOMPETENCYEVALUATOROPINESTHATTHEDEFENDANT THEISRESTORABLE COMPETENCY,whetherthereisasubstantialprobabilitythatthedefendant EVALUATOR OPINES THAT THE DEFENDANT REMAINS INCOMPETENT , whether there is a substantial probability thate defendant will be restored to competency within the reasonablytime foreseeableperiods futuISestablished RESTORABLEby ORthis UNRESTORABLEsectionIN ;SECTION 16-8.5-116;

(III) IF THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR OPINES THAT THE DEFENDANTISRESTORABLE ,whetherthereisasubstantialprobabilitythat the defendant will be restored to competency within the time periods established by this sectIN SECTION16-8.5-116;

(IV.3) WhetherthedefendantmeetsthecriteriaforacertificationWhether forthe short-termdefendant treatmentmeets pursuantthe tocriteria sectionfor 27-65-108.5a orcertification 27-65-109forshort-termtreatmentpursuanttosection27-65-108.5or27-65-109and, and, if the defendant meets such criteria, whether the evaluator believes the defendant could be treated on an outpatient basis pursuant to section 27-65-111.27-65-111.Inassessingwhetheradefendantwithapendingcriminalcharge is a danger to self or others or is gravely disabled, if the person is incarcerated, the evaluator shall not rely on the fact that the defendant is incarceratedorisaninpatientinamedicalfacilitytoestablishthedefendant is not a danger to self or others or is not gravely disabled.

In(IV.5) assessingWhetherthedefendanthasanintellectualanddevelopmental whetherdisability,asdefinedinsection25.5-10-202,andifthedefendantdoeshave asuch defendant with a pendingdisability, criminalwhether charge is a danger to self or others or is gravelydisabled, if the person is incarcerated, the evaluator shall not rely on the fact that the defendant ismay incarceratedbe oreligible isfor anany inpatientadditional inservices apursuant medical facility to establisharticle the10 defendantof istitle not25.5 a danger to self or othersarticle or10.5 isof nottitle gravely27. disabled.

(IV.5)(V) WhetherW theHETHER defendantTHE hasDEFENDANT anMEETS intellectualTHE andCRITERIA developmentalFOR disability,CERTIFICATION asFOR definedSHORT in-TERM sectionTREATMENT 25.5-10-202,PURSUANT andTO ifSECTION the27-65-108.5, defendant27-65-109, doesOR have27-65-109.5 suchAND a, disability,IF whetherTHE theDEFENDANT defendantMEETS mayTHE beCRITERIA eligible, forWHETHER anyTHE additionalCOMPETENCY servicesEVALUATOR pursuantBELIEVES toTHE articleDEFENDANT 10COULD ofBE titleTREATED 25.5ON orAN -46-OUTPATIENT 149BASIS articlePURSUANT 10.5TO ofSECTION title27-65-111.I 27.F THE DEFENDANT IS INCARCERATED OR IS INPATIENT IN A MEDICAL FACILITY AND HAS A PENDING CRIMINAL CHARGE , IN ASSESSING WHETHER THE DEFENDANT IS A DANGER TO THE DEFENDANT S SELF,A DANGER TO OTHERS ,OR GRAVELY DISABLED ,AS THOSE TERMS ARE DEFINED IN SECTION 27-65-102, THE COURT ,COMPETENCY EVALUATOR ,OR PROFESSIONALPERSON ,ASDEFINEDINSECTION 27-65-102, SHALLNOTRELY ON THE FACT THAT THE DEFENDANT IS INCARCERATED OR IS INPATIENT IN A PAGE 34-SENATE BILL 26-149 MEDICAL FACILITY TO ESTABLISH THAT THE DEFENDANT IS NOT A DANGER TO THE DEFENDANT S SELF,A DANGER TO OTHERS ,OR GRAVELY DISABLED .

(V)IF WIT HETHERIS THE DEFENDANTCOMPETENCY MEETSEVALUATOR S OPINION THAT THE DEFENDANT MEETS CRITERIA FOR CERTIFICATION FOR SHORT-TERMSHORT -TERM TREATMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 27-65-108.5,27-65-109OR27-65-108.5, 27-65-109.AND27-65-109, ,IFTHEOR DEFENDANT27-65-109.5, MEETS THE CRITERIA,WHETHER THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR BELIEVESIS THENOT DEFENDANTREQUIRED COULD BE TREATED ON AN OUTPATIENT BASIS PURSUANT TO SECTION27-65-111.IFTHEDEFENDANTISINCARCERATEDORISINPATIENTREQUEST IN A MEDICALPETITION FACILITYFOR ANDCERTIFICATION HASFOR ASHORT PENDING-TERM CRIMINALTREATMENT CHARGEOF ,IN ASSESSING WHETHER THE DEFENDANT IS A DANGER TO THE DEFENDANS SELF,ADANGERTOOTHERS ,ORGRAVELYDISABLED ,ASTHOSETERMSARE DEFINED IN SECTION27-65-102THE COURT ,COMPETENCY EVALUATOR , ORPROFESSIONALPERSON ASDEFINEDINSECTION 27-65-102SHALLNOT RELY ON THE FACT THAT THE DEFENDANT IS INCARCERATED OR IS INPATIENTINAMEDICALFACILITYTOESTABLISHTHATTHEDEFENDANTIS NOT A DANGER TO THE DEFENDANT S SELF,A DANGER TO OTHERS ,OR GRAVELY DISABLED .

F(VI) ITW ISHETHERTHEDEFENDANTHASADEVELOPMENTALDISABILITY , AND IF THE COMPETENCYDEFENDANT EVALUATOR'SDOES OPINIONHAVE THATA DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY , WHETHER THE DEFENDANT MEETSALSO HAS A MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 27-65-102, AND WHETHER THE DEFENDANT MAY BE ELIGIBLEFORANYADDITIONALSERVICESPURSUANTTOARTICLE 10 OFTITLE 25.5OR ARTICLE 10.5 OF TITLE27,OR MAY MEET THE CRITERIA FOR CERTIFICATIONA FORCIVIL SHORTPROCEEDING TERMTREATMENTPURSUANTTOSECTIONFOR 27-65-108.5,27-65-109,IMPOSITION OROF 27-65-109.5,THEA COMPETENCYLEGAL EVALUATORDISABILITY ISOR NOTREMOVAL REQUIREDOF TOA REQUESTAPETITIONFORCERTIFICATIONFORSHORTLEGAL -TERMTREATMENTOFRIGHT THEPURSUANT DEFENDANTTO .SECTION 25.5-10-216.

(VI) W HETHER THE DEFENDANT HAS A DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILIT, AND IF THE DEFENDANT DOES HAVE A DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY,WHETHER THE DEFENDANT ALSO HAS A MENTAL HEALTH DISORDER ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 27-65-102,AND WHETHER THE DEFENDANT MAYBE ELIGIBLE FOR ANYADDITIONALSERVICESPURSUANT TO ARTICLE10 OF TITL25.5OR ARTICLE10.5OFTITLE 27,OR MAY MEET -47- 149 THE CRITERIA FOR A CIVIL PROCEEDING FOR IMPOSITION OF A LEGAL DISABILITY OR REMOVAL OF A LEGAL RIGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 25.5-10-216.IF THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR S OPINION IS THAT THE DEFENDANT MAY MEET THE CRITERIA ,THE, THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR IS NOT REQUIRED TO PETITION THE COURT FOR IMPOSITION OF A LEGAL DISABILITY OR REMOVAL OF A LEGAL RIGH.RIGHT .

(VII) W HETHERHETHERTHEDEFENDANTHASANEUROCOGNITIVEDISORDER THE, DEFENDANTASDEFINEDINSECTION HAS25.5-10-501,AND A,IFTHE NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDER ,AS DEFINED IN SECTI25.5-10-501,AND,IF THE DEFENDANT DOES HAVE A NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDER ,WHETHER THE DEFENDANT MAY MEET THE CRITERIACRITERIAFORPROTECTIVEPLACEMENTPURSUANTTOSECTION FOR25.5-10-502. PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 25.5-10-502.FTHEOPINIONISTHATTHEDEFENDANTMAYMEET THE CRITERIA FOR PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT , THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR IS NOT REQUIRED TO PETITION THE COURT FOR PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT .

(V)IF (VIII)THE AOPINION DESCRIPTIONIS OFTHAT anyTHE andDEFENDANT allMAY effortsMEET madeTHE forCRITERIA restorationFOR throughPROTECTIVE medication,PLACEMENT therapy,,THE education,COMPETENCY orotherEVALUATOR servicesIS andNOT theREQUIRED outcomeTO ofPETITION thoseTHE effortsCOURT inFOR relationPROTECTIVE toPLACEMENT restoring. the defendant to competency;

(V) (VIII) ADESCRIPTIONOF anyandalleffortsmadeforrestoration through medication, therapy, education, or other services and the outcome of those efforts in relation to restoring the defendant to competency;

(VII)(IX)(VII) (IX) If the defendant has failed to cooperate with treatment RESTORATIONRESTORATIONSERVICES SERVICES,whethertheincompetencyandmental ,DISABILITY whetheror theintellectual incompetency and mentaldevelopmental DISABILITYordisability intellectualcontribuIS andTHE developmentalPRIMARY disabilityREASONFOR contISbutesthedefendant'srefusalorinabilitytocooperatewithrestoration toor THEPRIMARYREASONFORprevents thedefendant'srefusalorinabilitytocooperatethe withrestorationorpreventstheabilityofability thedefendanttocooperatewithof restoration;RVICES;the defendant to cooperate with restoration;

andSERVICES (VIII)(X); Asummaryoftheobservationsof thedefendantbythe treatingREATMENT staff at the facilityor other location where inpatient -48- 149 RESTORATION services were delivered.

(c)and AtleasttenPAGE days35-SENATE beforeBILL each26-149 reviewRING(VIII) ,(X) A summary of the departmentobservations treatingCDHSof TREATMENTthe teamdefendant shallby providethe totreatingTREATMENT staff at the courtfacility anor additionalother reportlocation thatwhere summarizes:inpatient RESTORATION services were delivered.

(I)(c) WhatAt restorativeleast educationten hasVICESHAVEdays beenbefore providedeach TOreviewARING THE, DEFENDANTthe anddepartment treating CDHS TREATMENT team shall provide to the frequencycourt ofan tTHEadditional educationSERVICES;report that summarizes:

(II)(I) WhatWhatrestorativeeducationhasSERVICESHAVE medicationbeenprovided hasTO beenTHE administeredTHE DEFENDANT ,and includingthe voluntaryfrequency orof involuntarythaTHE medications;education SERVICES ;

(III)(II) What releasemedication planshas have been madeadministered forTO theTHE defendantDEFENDANT after, release, including avoluntary discussionor ofinvoluntary themedications; support fromDEFENDANT 'S family members;

(IV)(III) WhetherWhat orrelease notplans have been made for the defendant wouldafter agreerelease,includingadiscussionofthesupportfrom toTHEDEFENDANT voluntary'Sfamily admissiontothehospitalforcertificationpursuanttoarticle65oftitle27;members;

(V)(IV) TheWhether opinionor ofnot the treatingdefendant TREATMENTwould teamagree onto thevoluntary defendant'sadmission mentalto healththe functioninghospital andfor abilitycertification pursuant to functionarticle on65 anof outpatienttitle basis27; for restoration services;

and(V) (VI)Theopinionofthetreating IFTREATMENT THEteamonthedefendant's DEFENDANTmental IShealth CONTINUINGfunctioning TOand RECEIVEabilityto INPATIENTfunction RESTORATIONSERVICESon ,whetherthedefendant,basedonobservationsofan theoutpatient defendant'sbasis behavior in the facility, presents a substantial risk to the physical safety of the defendant's self, of another person, or of the community if released for communityestoratioSERVICES;ANDrestoration (VII)services; Repealed.W HETHERTHEDEFENDANTPOSESASUBSTANTIAL RISKOFSERIOUSHARMTOOTHERS ,ASDEFINEDINSECTION 27-65-102,I:

(A)and T(VI) HEIF THE DEFENDANT IS CHARGEDCONTINUING WITH HOMICIDE PURSUANT TO PARTRECEIVE 1INPATIENT OFRESTORATION ARTICLE3SERVICES OF, TITLE18;Awhether CRIMEthe OFdefendant, VIOLENCE,ASbased DEFINEDon INobservations SECTIONof 18-1.3-406the (2);ORdefendant's Abehavior FELONYin THATthe CONSTITUTESfacility, UNLAWFULpresents SEXUALa BEHAVIORsubstantial ,ASrisk DEFINEDto INthe SECTIO16-22-102;ORphysical -49-safety 149of (B)the Tdefendant's HEself, PROSECUTIONof REQUESTEDanother ANperson, OPINIONor REGARDINGof WHETHERTHEthe DEFENDANTcommunity POSESif Areleased SUBSTANTIALRISKfor OFSERIOUSHARMcommunity TOrestorationSERVICES OTHERS;AND BECAUSE(VII) THERepealed. PROSECUTION IS AWARE OF AN ACT DESCRIBED IN SECTION16-8.5-118 (6)(b)(THAT IS NOT CHARGED IN THE CURRENT CASE THE DEFENDANT IS ALLEGED TO HAVE COMMITTED AND IS OR WAS CHARGEDINACRIMINALCASEIN COLORADOINWHICHCOMPETENCYWAS RAISED.

W HETHER THE DEFENDANT POSES A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF SERIOUS HARM TO OTHERS ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 27-65-102, IF:

(A) T HE DEFENDANT IS CHARGED WITH HOMICIDE PURSUANT TO PART 1 OF ARTICLE 3 OF TITLE 18;A CRIME OF VIOLENCE , AS DEFINED IN SECTION 18-1.3-406 (2);

OR A FELONY THAT CONSTITUTES UNLAWFUL SEXUAL BEHAVIOR , AS DEFINED IN SECTION 16-22-102;

OR (B) THE PROSECUTION REQUESTED AN OPINION REGARDING PAGE 36-SENATE BILL 26-149 WHETHERTHEDEFENDANTPOSESASUBSTANTIALRISKOFSERIOUSHARMTO OTHERS BECAUSE THE PROSECUTION IS AWARE OF AN ACT DESCRIBED IN SECTION 16-8.5-118 (6)(b)(ITHAT IS NOT CHARGED IN THE CURRENT CASE THEDEFENDANTISALLEGEDTOHAVECOMMITTEDANDISORWASCHARGED IN A CRIMINAL CASE INC OLORADO IN WHICH COMPETENCY WAS RAISED .

(3)(2)(3) (2) After the initial reHEARINGrevieHEARING CONDUCTED pursuant to subsection(2)(a)UBSECTIONsubsection (1)(a)ofthissection,thecourtshallreview(2)(a)UBSECTION (1)(a) of this section, the court shall review the case of the defendant everyninety-oneevery ninety-one days.

At least ten days before eacheachreview,theindividualorentityevaluatingthedefendant review, the individual or entity evaluating the defendant COMPETENCY EVALUATOR shall provide the court with an updated COMPETENCY EVALUATION report as described in subsectionsubsection(2)SUBSECTION (2)(b)(1)(b) SUBSECTIONof (1)(b)ofthis thissectionandthetreatmentstaffsection shallprovideanand the treatment staff shall provide an updated summary of observations as described in subsection (2)(c)(2)(c)BSECTION SUBSECTION (1)(c) of this section.

(5)(3)(5) Thecourtshallforwardacopyofeachreportandsummary(3) receivedThe pursuantcourt toshall subsectionsforward (2)a copy of each report and (3)TIONSsummary (1)ANDreceivedpursuanttosubsections(2)and(3) (2)SUBSECTIONS of(1)AND this(2)ofthis section to the countyattorneyorcounty districtattorney attorneyrequiredor todistrict conductattorney proceedingsrequired pursuant to sectionconduct 27-65-113proceedingspursuanttosection27-65-113(6) (6)ONSECTION 27-65-113.527-65-113.5forthe forcounty thein countyin which the case is pending and, when a bridges court liaison is appointed, to the bridges court liaison.

Restorability hearing - burdens of proof - -50- 149 determination - dismissal.

(1) (a) TETHE COURT MAY ,UPON MOTION OF A PARTY AND UPON A SHOWINGSHOWINGOFGOODCAUSE OF,SETARESTORABILITYHEARINGWITHINTHETIME GOOD CAUSE ,SET A RESTORABILITY HEARING WITHIN THE TIME FRAME SET FORTH IN SECTIO16-8.5-108SECTION 16-8.5-108 (1)(d).

(b) IFI F THE FINAL DETERMINATION MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-103IS16-8.5-103 IS THAT THE DEFENDANT IS INCOMPETENT TO PROCEED AND A COMPETENCYCOMPETENCYEVALUATOROPINESTHATTHEDEFENDANTISUNRESTORABLE EVALUATOR, OPINESPAGE THAT37-SENATE THEBILL DEFENDANT26-149 ISAND UNRESTORABLE ,AND EITHER A RESTORABILITY HEARING HAS NOT BEEN HELD OR ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY -TWO DAYS HAVE PASSED SINCE THE DEFENDANT BEGAN RECEIVINGRECEIVINGRESTORATIONSERVICESAFTERAFINDINGOFRESTORABILITY RESTORATION,THE SERVICES AFTER A FINDING OF RESTORABILITY,THE COURT SHALL ,UPON MOTION OF A PARTY,SETPARTY ,SET A RESTORABILITY HEARINGWITHINTHEHEARING WITHIN THE TIME FRAME SET FORTH IN SECTION 16-8.5-108(1)(d).ARESTORABILITYHEARINGMAYBECOMBINEDWITHA16-8.5-108 RESTORATION(1)(d). HEARING ,IF APPROPRIATE.

(c) IF THE COURT RECEIVES THE COMPETENCY EVALUATOR 'S OPINIONTHATTHEDEFENDANT ISUNRESTORABLE PRIORTOENTERINGAN INITIAL ORDER FOR RESTORATION SERVICES, THE COURT SHALL SET A RESTORABILITYHEARINGWITHINTHIRTYRESTORABILITYHEARINGMAYBECOMBINEDWITHARESTORATIONHEARING FIVEDAYSAFTERRECEIVINGTHE, OPINIONIF UNLESSAPPROPRIATE. THE TIME IS EXTENDED BY THE COURT AFTER A FINDING OF GOOD CAUSE .

(2)(c) ATITHECOURTRECEIVESTHECOMPETENCYEVALUATOR ANYSOPINION THAT THE DEFENDANT IS UNRESTORABLE PRIOR TO ENTERING AN INITIAL ORDER FOR RESTORATION SERVICES, THE COURT SHALL SET A RESTORABILITY HEARING CONDUCTEDWITHIN PURSUANTTHIRTY-FIVE TODAYS THISAFTER SECTION:RECEIVING THE OPINION UNLESS THE TIME IS EXTENDED BY THE COURT AFTER A FINDING OF GOOD CAUSE .

(a)(2) TATANYRESTORABILITYHEARINGCONDUCTEDPURSUANTTOTHIS HESECTION: DEFENDANT HAS THE BURDEN OF PROVING BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFENDANT IS UNRESTORABLE IF ANY CHARGE IN ANY OF THE DEFENDANT S PENDING CRIMINAL CASES IN THE STATE OCOLORADO INCLUDE A CRIME SUBJECT TO THE "VICTIM RIGHTS A CT",SECTION 24-4.1-302 (1)UNLAWFUL -51- 149 SEXUAL CONTACT , AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION18-3-404;OR INDECENT EXPOSURE ,AS DESCRIBED IN SECTIO18-7-302AND (b) THE PROSECUTION HAS THE BURDEN OF PROVING BY A PREPONDERANCEOFTHEEVIDENCETHATTHEDEFENDANTISRESTORABLE IF THE DEFENDANT DOES NOT HAVE A PENDING CRIMINAL CASE IN THE STATE OFC OLORADO THAT INCLUDES A CHARGE OF A CRIME SUBJECT TO THE "VICTIMR IGHTSA CT"SECTION 24-4.1-302(1)UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONTACT ,AS DESCRIBED IN SECTIO18-3-404;OR INDECENT EXPOSURE, AS DESCRIBED IN SECTIO18-7-302.

(3)(a) WT HENHE DETERMININGDEFENDANT WHETHERHAS THE BURDEN OF PROVING BY A PREPONDERANCEOFTHEEVIDENCETHATTHEDEFENDANTISUNRESTORABLE IF ANY CHARGE IN ANY OF THE DEFENDANT S PENDING CRIMINAL CASES IN THE STATE OF COLORADO INCLUDE A CRIME SUBJECT TO THE "VICTIM RIGHTS A CT",SECTION 24-4.1-302 (1)UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONTACT ,AS DESCRIBEDINSECTION 18-3-404;ORINDECENTEXPOSURE ,ASDESCRIBEDIN SECTION 18-7-302;AND (b) T HE PROSECUTION HAS THE BURDEN OF PROVING BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFENDANT IS RESTORABLE ORIFTHEDEFENDANTDOESNOTHAVEAPENDINGCRIMINALCASEINTHESTATE UNRESTORABLEOF ,COLORADO THETHAT COURTINCLUDES SHALLA CONSIDERCHARGE ALLOF RELEVANTA INFORMATIONCRIME ,INCLUDING,BUTSUBJECT NOTTO LIMITEDTHE T:"VICTIM RIGHTS A CT", SECTION 24-4.1-302 (1);

(a)UNLAWFUL ASEXUAL NYCONTACT DIAGNOSED,ASDESCRIBEDINSECTION MENTAL18-3-404;ORINDECENT DISORDEREXPOSURE OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITYGIVINGRISETOTHEDEFENDANT SINCOMPETENCY ,INCLUDING AN INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY ,AS DEFINEDDESCRIBED IN SECTIONSECTION18-7-302. 25.5-10-202,OR NEUROCOGNITIVE DISORDER, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 25.5-10-501ANDWHETHERTHEDIAGNOSEDMENTALDISORDER OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY CAN BE TREATED , MITIGATED, OR MANAGED IN A WAY THAT WOULD ALLOW THE DEFENDANT TO PROGRESS TOWARD BECOMING COMPETENT TO PROCEED ;

(b)(3) THEW NATUREHENDETERMININGWHETHERTHEDEFENDANTIS ANDRESTORABLE SEVERITYOR OFUNRESTORABLE THE, DEFENDANT S INCOMPETENCYANDWHETHERTHEDEFENDANT 'SLEVELOFCOMPETENCY CAN BE IMPROVED THROUGH ANY SERVICES THE COURT MAYSHALL LAWFULLYCONSIDER ORDERALL ,INCLUDINGRELEVANT SERVICESINFORMATION THAT,INCLUDING ARE,BUT INNOT ADDITIONLIMITED TOT: RESTORATION SERVICES;

(c)(a) TA HENY EXPERIENCES,DIAGNOSED OBSERVATIONSMENTAL ,DISORDER OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY GIVING RISE TO THE DEFENDANTS INCOMPETENCY ,INCLUDING PAGE 38-SENATE BILL 26-149 AN INTELLECTUAL AND OPINIONSDEVELOPMENTAL OFDISABILITY QUALIFIED, EXPERTS,INCLUDINGAS MEDICALDEFINED PROFESSIONALS,TREATMENTIN -52-SECTION 14925.5-10-202, PROVIDERSOR ,ANDNEUROCOGNITIVE RESTORATIONDISORDER SPECIALISTS;,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 25.5-10-501ANDWHETHERTHEDIAGNOSEDMENTALDISORDEROR DEVELOPMENTALDISABILITYCANBETREATED ,MITIGATED,ORMANAGEDIN A WAY THAT WOULD ALLOW THE DEFENDANT TO PROGRESS TOWARD BECOMING COMPETENT TO PROCEED ;

(d)(b) TTHENATUREANDSEVERITYOFTHEDEFENDANT HESINCOMPETENCY EXPERIENCESANDWHETHERTHEDEFENDANT ,OBSERVATIONS'SLEVELOFCOMPETENCYCANBEIMPROVED ,ANDTHROUGH OPINIONSANY OFSERVICES LAYTHE PERSONSCOURT WHOMAY ARELAWFULLY FAMILIARORDER WITH THE DEFENDANT ,INCLUDING FAMILYSERVICES MEMBERSTHAT ,FRIENDS,ARE ASSOCIATES,IN ANDADDITION ANYTO OTHERRESTORATION INDIVIDUALSERVICES; WITH WHOM THE DEFENDANT HAS HAD SIGNIFICANT INTERACTIONS ;

(e)(c) TTHE HEEXPERIENCES,OBSERVATIONS DEFENDANT,ANDOPINIONSOFQUALIFIED 'SEXPERTS ,INCLUDING MEDICAL HISTORYPROFESSIONALS ,CRIMINAL,TREATMENT HISTORYPROVIDERS , COMPETENCY AND RESTORATION HISTORYSPECIALISTS , AND CIVIL COMMITMENT HISTORY ;

(f)(d) THE FACTSEXPERIENCES AND, CONTEXTOBSERVATIONS OF, CURRENT AND PASTOPINIONS CHARGESOF AGAINSTLAY THEPERSONS DEFENDANTWHO ASARE EVIDENCEDFAMILIAR BYWITH POLICETHE REPORTSDEFENDANT ,VIDEO,INCLUDING ORFAMILY AUDIOMEMBERS RECORDINGSFRIENDS ,,ASSOCIATES,ANDANYOTHERINDIVIDUALWITHWHOM PHYSICALTHE EVIDENCE,DEFENDANT WITNESSHAS ORHAD VICTIMSIGNIFICANT STATEMENTSINTERACTIONS ,AND; ANY OTHER RELIABLE SOURCES;

(g)(e) A NY RELEVANT STATEMENTS MADE BY THE DEFENDANT DURING'S THEMEDICAL RESTORATIONHISTORY PROCESS, ;ORCRIMINAL (h)HISTORY T, HECOMPETENCY DEFENDANTAND SRESTORATION LEVELHISTORY OF, EFFORT AND ENGAGEMENTCIVIL ,COMMITMENT INCLUDINGHISTORY ANY; VOLITIONAL LACK OF COOPERATION OR UNWILLINGNESS TO PARTICIPATE.

(f) T HE FACTS AND CONTEXT OF CURRENT AND PAST CHARGES AGAINST THE DEFENDANT AS EVIDENCED BY POLICE REPORTS ,VIDEO OR AUDIORECORDINGS ,PHYSICALEVIDENCE ,WITNESSORVICTIMSTATEMENTS , AND ANY OTHER RELIABLE SOURCES ;

(g) ANYRELEVANTSTATEMENTSMADEBYTHEDEFENDANTDURING THE RESTORATION PROCESS ;OR (h) T HE DEFENDANT S LEVEL OF EFFORT AND ENGAGEMENT , INCLUDINGANYVOLITIONALLACKOFCOOPERATIONORUNWILLINGNESSTO PARTICIPATE.

PAGE 39-SENATE BILL 26-149 (I) IF THE COURT FINDS THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS NOT MET THE BURDEN OF PROVING THE DEFENDANT IS UNRESTORABLE PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(a)OF(2)(a) OF THIS SECTION , THE COURT SHALL FIND THE DEFENDANTDEFENDANTRESTORABLEANDORDERAPPROPRIATERESTORATIONSERVICES RESTORABLE AND ORDERSET APPROPRIATEA RESTORATIONREVIEW SERVICESANDSETAREVIEWHEARINGPURSUANTTOSECTIONHEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-112.

(II) IFF THE COURT FINDS THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS MET THE BURDENOFPROVINGTHEYAREUNRESTORABLEPURSUANTTOSUBSECTIONBURDEN (2)(a)OFOF PROVING THEY ARE UNRESTORABLE PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(a) OF THIS SECTION , THE COURT SHALL FIND THE DEFENDANT -53- 149 UNRESTORABLE .

(III)IF(III)IFTHECOURTFINDSTHATTHEPROSECUTIONHASNOTMET THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PROSECUTION HAS NOT MET THE BURDEN OF PROVING THE DEFENDANT IS RESTORABLE PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(b)OF(2)(b) OF THIS SECTION,SECTION , THE COURT SHALL FIND THE DEFENDANT UNRESTORABLE .

(IV) IF THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PROSECUTION HAS MET THE BURDEN OF PROVING THE DEFENDANT IS RESTORABLE PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(b)OF(2)(b) OF THIS SECTION,SECTION , THE COURT SHALL FIND THE DEFENDANTDEFENDANTRESTORABLEANDORDERAPPROPRIATERESTORATIONSERVICES RESTORABLE AND ORDERSET APPROPRIATEA RESTORATIONREVIEW SERVICESANDSETAREVIEWHEARINGPURSUANTTOSECTIONHEARING PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-112.

(b) IF THE COURT FINDS THE DEFENDANT IS UNRESTORABLE PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (4)(a)(IOR(4)(a)(II)OR (4)(a)(IIOF(4)(a)(IIIOF THIS SECTIO,THESECTION ,THE COURT SHALL ORDER THE DISMISSAL OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE DEFENDANT AND STAY THE ORDER AND PROCEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 16-8.5-117UNLESS16-8.5-117, UNLESS THE PROSECUTION REQUESTSACIVILCOMMITMENTORENHANCEDPROTECTIVEPLACEMENT ,,IN IN WHICH CASE THE COURT SHALL PROCEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 16-8.5-118.

(5) [Formerly 16-8.5-111 (6)(a)] (a) NothiThisNothing in This article 8.5 prohibitsOESprohibitsDOES NOT PROHIBITthePROHIBIT the court fromfindingfrom finding that the defendant is restorable to competencycompetencyin in the reasonablyreasonablyforeseeable foreseeablefutureased futureon the defendant'sdefendant'svolitionallackofcooperationorunwillingnesstoparticipatein volitionalrestoration lackservices ofand cooperationtreatmentTHE orCOURT unwillingnessFINDS toTHAT participateinrestorationservicesreatmentifTHECOURTFINDSTHAT the defendant could be restored to competency in the reasonably foreseeable futureRESTORABLEfuture ifRESTORABLE theifthedefendantcooperatedandparticipatedintherestoration defendantservices. cooperated and participated in the restorationces.

PAGE 40-SENATE BILL 26-149 16-8.5-114.

Restoration hearing - burdens of proof - -54- 149 determination.

(1) (a) [Formerly 16-8.5-113 (1)] The court may, order UPON A MOTION OF A PARTY AND UPON A SHOWING OF GOOD CAUSE ,SET, SET a restoration hearing at any time on its own motion, on motion of the prosecutingattorney,oronmotionofprosecuting thedefendant;exceptthatthecourtattorney, shallor orderon amotion restorationof hearingthe whendefendant; required pursuant to section 16-8.5-111(4)(a)or(4)(b)THINTHETIMEFRAMESETFORTHINSECTION 16-8.5-108(1)(d).OR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBSECTIO(1)(aGOOD CAUSE INCLUDES IF A DEFENDANT IS APPROACHING THE MAXIMUM TIME PERMITTED TO RESTORE THE DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-116.A RESTORATION HEARING MAY BE COMBINED WITH A RESTORABILITY HEARING,IF APPROPRIAT.

(b)except THEthat COURTthe SHALLcourt SETshall Aorder RESTORATIONa HEARINGrestoration WITHINhearing when required pursuant to section 16-8.5-111 (4)(a) or (4)(WITHIN THE TIME FRAME SET FORTH IN SECTI16-8.5-108SECTION (1)(dUPON16-8.5-108 MOTION(1)(d). OF A PARTY IF:

(I)OR TECOURTHASORDEREDTHE CDHSPURPOSES TOPROVIDEANINCOMPETENTOF DEFENDANTTHIS RESTORATIONSUBSECTION SERVICES(1)(a)GOOD PURSUANTCAUSE TOINCLUDES SECTIONIF 16-8.5-110A AND THE DEFENDANT IS RECEIVINGAPPROACHING RESTORATIONTHE SERVICE;MAXIMUM TIME PERMITTEDTORESTORETHEDEFENDANTPURSUANTTOSECTION 16-8.5-116.

(II) HE COURT RECEIVES A COMPETENCY EVALUATOR S OPINION THAT THE DEFENDANT IS COMPETENT TO PROCEED;AND (III) A RESTORATION HEARING HASMAY NOTBE BEENCOMBINED HELDWITH OR ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY TWO DAYS HAVE PASSED AFTER A FINDINGRESTORABILITY ATHEARING A,IF RESTORATIONHEARINGTHATTHEDEFENDANTREMAINSINCOMPETENTTOAPPROPRIATE PROCEEDANDTHEDEFENDANTHASCONTINUEDTORECEIVERESTORATION. SERVICES.

(2)(b) [FormerlyT 16-8.5-113HE (2)]COURT WithinSHALL fourteenSET daysA afterRESTORATION receiptHEARING ofWITHIN aTHE reportTIME fromFRAME theSET departmentFORTH orIN otherSECTION court-approved16-8.5-108 competency(1)(d)UPON -55-MOTION 149OF evaluatorA certifyingPARTY thatIF: the defendant is competent to proceed, Either party may request aRESTORATION hearing or a second evaluation The court shall determine whether to allow the second evaluation or proceed to a hearing on competency.

If(I) theTHE secondCOURT evaluationHAS isORDERED requestedCDHS byTO thePROVIDE courtAN orINCOMPETENT byDEFENDANTRESTORATIONSERVICESPURSUANTTOSECTION an16-8.5-110 indigentAND defendant,THE theDEFENDANT evaluationIS mustRECEIVING beRESTORATION paidSERVICES for; by the court PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-111.

(3)(II) [FormerlyT 16-8.5-113HE (4)]COURT IfRECEIVES neitherA partyCOMPETENCY requestsEVALUATOR aS RESTORATIONOPINION hearingTHAT orTHE secondDEFENDANT evaluationIS withinCOMPETENT theTO timePROCEED frame;AND set(III) forthinsubsection(2)ofthissectionECTIONA 16-8.5-108(1)(a),thecourtRESTORATION shallHEARING enterHAS aNOT finalBEEN determination,HELD basedOR onONE theHUNDRED informationEIGHTY then-TWO availableDAYS toHAVE thePASSED court,AFTER whetherA theFINDING defendantAT isA orRESTORATION isHEARING notTHAT competentTHE ORDEFENDANT REMAINS INCOMPETENT toTO proceed.PROCEED AND THE DEFENDANT HAS CONTINUED TO RECEIVE RESTORATION SERVICES .

(4)(2) [Formerly 16-8.5-113 (6)](2)] AtWithin theTORATIONfourteen hearing,days after receipt of areportfromthedepartmentorothercourt-approvedcompetencyevaluator certifying that the partyassertingthatthedefendantiscompetenthastheburdenofproofbydefendant is competent to proceed, Either party may request a preponderanceRESTORATION ofhearing theor evidencea andsecond evaluation The court shall determine whether to allow the burdensecond ofevaluation submittingor evidence.proceed to a hearing on competency.

AtIf the RESTORATIONsecond hearing,evaluation is requested by the court shallor determineby whetheran indigent defendant, the defendantevaluation ismust restoredbe topaid competency.for bythe cPURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-111.

(5)PAGE 41-SENATE BILL 26-149 (3) [Formerly 16-8.5-11116-8.5-113 (9)](4)] WhenIf theneither departmentparty CDHSrequests submitsareporttothecourtthatthedepartment'sCDHS'a SRESTORATION positionisthathearing or second evaluation within the defendanttime isframe restoredset toforth competency,in subsection (2) of this sectionCTION 16-8.5-108 (1)(a), the defendantcourt mayshall beenter returneda final determination, based on the information then available to the custodyofcourt, whether the countyjail.defendant is or is notcompetent OR INCOMPETENT to proceed.

The(4) sheriff[Formerly shall16-8.5-113 return(6)] At the RESTORATION hearing, the party asserting that the defendant tois thecustodyofthecountyjailwithinseventy-twohoursafterreceiptofthecompetent department'shas noticethe CDHSSburden REPORTof .proof by apreponderanceof theevidenceandtheburdenofsubmittingevidence.At theRESTORATION hearing, the court shall determine whether the defendant is restored to competency.

(5)[Formerly16-8.5-111(9)]Whenthedepartment CDHSsubmits a report to the court that the department'sCDHS' S position is that the defendant is restored to competency, the defendant may be returned to the custody of the county jail.

The sheriff shall return the defendant to the custody of the county jail within seventy-two hours after receipt of the department's notice CDHS' S REPORT .

(1) [Formerly 16-8.5-114 (1)](1)]If Ifadefendantisfoundtoberestored a defendant is found to be restored to competency after theTORATIONthe RESTORATION hearing held pursuant to section 16-8.5-113 SECTION 16-8.5-114, the court shall resume the -56- 149 criminal proceedings or order the sentence carried out.

The court shall credit any time the defendant spent in confinement while committed pursuant to section 16-8.5-111CTION16-8.5-111 SECTION 16-8.5-110 against any term of imprisonment imposed after restoration to competency.

(2) [Formerly 16-8.5-114 (2)] If, after theRATIONtheRESTORATION hearing held pursuant to section 16-8.5-113SECTION16-8.5-113 SECTION 16-8.5-114, the court determines that the defendant remains incompetent to proceed, the court may continue or modify any orders entered at the time of the original determinationdeterminationofincompetencyandmaycommitorrecommitthedefendant of incompetency and may commit or recommit the defendant TO CDHS' S CUSTODY or enter any new order necessary to facilitate the defendant's restoration to mentalency,mental competency, consistent with the requirements of section 16-8.5SECTION16-8.5-111 SECTION 16-8.5-110.

DismissalofchargesafterreachingmaximumtimeDismissal of charges after reaching maximum time PAGE 42-SENATE BILL 26-149 permitted to restore defendant - exceptions - rules.

(1)(1)[Formerly16-8.5-116.5(2)]Atareviewhearingheld [FormerlyPURSUANT 16-8.5-116.5TOSECTION (2)]16-8.5-112concerningthedefendant'scompetencytoproceed, At a review hearing held PURSUANTTOSECTION 16-8.5-112concerningthedefendant'scompetency to proceed, the court shall dismiss the charges against the defendant and releasethedefendantfromconfinementpursuanttosubsection(7)ofthisrelease sectionif:the defendant from confinement pursuant to subsection (7) of this section (a) The defendant's highest charged offense is a class 1 misdemeanor;

(a)ANY TheMISDEMEANOR defendant'sTHAT highestCONSTITUTES chargedA offenseFIRST isOFFENSE PURSUANT TOPART 13 OFARTICLE 4OFTITLE 42;orisalevel4drug felony, and the defendant has been in the department's CDHS' S custody for restoration services or has been confined in a classjail 1or misdemeanor;other detention facility awaitingtransporttothedepartment CDHSforcourt-orderedrestorationfor an aggregate time of six months;

ANYand MISDEMEANOR(b) THATThe CONSTITUTEScourt Adetermines, FIRSTbased OFFENSEon PURSUANTavailable TOevidence, PARTthat 13the OFdefendant ARTICLEremains 4incompetent OFto TITLE42;proceed.

or(2)[Formerly16-8.5-116.5(3)]Atareviewhearingheld isPURSUANT aTOSECTION level16-8.5-112concerningthedefendant'scompetencytoproceed, 4the drugcourt felony,shall dismiss the charges against the defendant and release the defendant hasfrom beenconfinement inpursuant theto department'ssubsection Scustody(7) forof restorationthis servicessection or(a) hasThe beendefendant's confinedhighest incharged offense is a jailclass 5 or otherclass detention6 facilityfelony;ANY awaitingMISDEMEANOR transportTHAT toCONSTITUTES theA departmentSECOND forOR court-orderedSUBSEQUENT restorationOFFENSE forPURSUANT anTO aggregatePART time13 ofOF sixARTICLE months;4 OF TITLE42;

and (b) The court determines, based on available evidence, that the -57- 149 defendant remains incompetent to proceed.

(2) [Formerly 16-8.5-116.5 (3)] At a review hearing held PURSUANTTOSECTION 16-8.5-112concerningthedefendant'scompetency to proceed, the court shall dismiss the charges against the defendant andreleasethedefendantfromconfinementpursuanttosubsection(7)of this section:

(a) The defendant's highest charged offense is a class 5 or class 6 felonyANYMISDEMEANORTHATCONSTITUTESASECONDORSUBSEQUENT OFFENSE PURSUANT TO PART 13OF ARTICLE 4OF TITLE42;

or a level 3 drug felony and the defendant has been in the department's'department's CDHS' S custody for restoration services or has been confined in a jail or other detention facility awaitingawaitingtransporttothedepartment transportCDHSforcourt-orderedrestorationfor to the departCDHS for court-ordered restoration for an aggregate period of one year;

(3)(3)[Formerly16-8.5-116.5(4)]Atareviewhearingheld [FormerlyPURSUANT 16-8.5-116.5TOSECTION (4)]16-8.5-112concerningthedefendant'scompetencytoproceed, At a review hearing held PURSUANTTOSECTION 16-8.5-112concerningthedefendant'scompetency to proceed, the court shall dismiss the charges against the defendant andreleasethedefendantfromconfinementpursuanttoand subsection(7)ofrelease the defendant from confinement pursuant tosubsection (7) of this section,:section, if:

PAGE 43-SENATE BILL 26-149 (a) Thedefendant'shighestchargedoffenseisaclass4felonyandThe defendant's highest charged offense is a class 4 felony and the defendant has been in the department'sdepartment'sCDHS' CDHS'Scustodyfor S custody for restoration services or has been confined in a jail or other detention facility awaiting transport to the department CDHS for court-ordered restoration for an aggregate period of two years;

and (b) The court determines, based on available evidence, that the -58- 149 defendant remains incompetent to proceed.

(4) [Formerly 16-8.5-116.5 (5)] Subsections (2), (3), and (4) SUBSECTIONS (1),(2)AND(1),(2),AND (3)ofthissectiondonotapplyifthedefendant(3) of this section do not apply if the defendant is charged with a class 1, 2, or 3 felonyoffense;felonyoffense;asexoffense,as defined in section 18-1.3-1003 (5);

a sex offense, as defined in section 18-1.3-1003 (5);

and (c) Thedefendant'spresentenceconfinementcredit,includinganyThe timedefendant's periodpresentence theconfinement defendantcredit, wasincluding committedany fortimeperiodthedefendantwascommittedforinpatientrestoration inpatientestorationSERVICES SERVICES,, ororconfinedinjailoranotherdetentionfacilityawaitinginpatientrestoration confinedservices,exceedsthemaximumsentenceforthedefendant'shighestcharged in jail or another detention facility awaiting inpatient restoration services, exceeds the maximum sentence for the defendant's highest charged offense.

(6)to(15)(6) Repealed.FTHECONDITIONSALLOWINGTHECOURTTOto (15) Repealed.IF THE CONDITIONS ALLOWING THE COURT TO STAY A DISMISSALAPPLY,THEDISMISSAL APPLY ,THE COURT SHALLSTAYASHALL DISMISSALORDEREDSTAY PURSUANTTOTHISSECTIONINACCORDANCEWITHSECTIONA 16-8.5-117ORDISMISSAL ORDERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 16-8.5-117 OR 16-8.5-118.

(7) [Formerly 16-8.5-116.5 (13)] When the defendant is charged with an offense in municipal court and the defendant is found incompetent totoproceed,orwhencivilcommitment proceed,proceedingsareinitiatedpursuantto or whencivil commitment proceedings are initiated pursuant to article 65 of title 27, the municipal court shall dismiss the case.

(8)(8)[Formerly16-8.5-116.5(14)]Ifadefendantisincustodyandthe [FormerlyPAGE 16-8.5-116.544-SENATE (14)]BILL If26-149 adepartment defendantCDHS is in custodyand the departmentCDHS does not complycomplywith with the time limits set forth in -59- 149 section 16-8.5-11116-8.5-111thedefendantissubjecttothetimelimitssetforthinsubsections the defendant is subject to the time limits set forth in subsections (2), (3), and (4) of this sectionONsectSECTION 16-8.5-110, and, baseduponthebestavailableevidence,thedefendantwillnotbeadmittedbased toaninpatientfacilitytobeginrestorationVICESwithinthetimelimitsupon describedthe inbest available evidence, the applicabledefendant subsectionSECTIONSwill (1),not (2ORbe (3)OFadmitted THISto SECTION,an theinpatient courtfacilitytobeginrestorationSERVICES withinthetimelimitsdescribedinthe applicablesubsection SUBSECTION (1),(2),OR (3)OFTHISSECTION ,thecourt may release the defendant or dismiss the case in lieu of the defendant remaining in custody on a wait list for restoration services.

(9) [Formerly 16-8.5-116.5 (15)] WhenadefendantisWhen a defendant is in custody and is found incompetent to proceed, at everyeverysubsequent subsequentreviewEARING review HEARING of the defendant's case, the court shall make a finding on the record regarding the expiration of applicable time limits set forth in this section.

(10) [Formerly 16-8.5-116.5 (16)] If a defendant files a motion allegingallegingthecourtis the court is required to dismissdismissthecasebecauseatimelimitinthis the case because a time limit in this section has expired, the defendant is entitled to a timelyhearing and ruling on the motion.

(1) IF THE COURT DETERMINES THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL PROBABILITY THAT THE DEFENDANT WILL BE FOUND UNRESTORABLE PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-113,THE16-8.5-113, THE DEFENDANT WILL REACH THE MAXIMUM TIME PERMITTED TO RESTORE THE DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-116,OR16-8.5-116, OR THE COURT WILLWILLORDER ORDER THE INITIATION OFOFA ACIVIL CIVILPROCEEDINGPURSUANTTOTHISSECTIONPROCEEDING ,THECOURTSHALLPURSUANT ,UNLESSTO THETHIS COURTSECTION FINDS,THE THERECOURT ISSHALL AN,UNLESS ACCEPTABLETHE CARECOURTFINDSTHEREISANACCEPTABLECARECOORDINATIONALTERNATIVE COORDINATION ALTERNATIVE ALREADY IN PLACE ,APPOINT, ABRIDGESCOURTAPPOINT LIAISONA TOBRIDGES -60-COURT 149LIAISON TO PROVIDE SERVICES AUTHORIZED IN ARTICL95ARTICLE 95 OF TITL13,WHICHTITLE13, WHICH MAY INCLUDE:INCLUDE :

(a) SSISTINGWITHCASEPLANNINGANDCOORDINATINGSERVICESASSISTING WITH CASE PLANNING AND COORDINATING SERVICES FOR THE DEFENDANT ,INCLUDING, INCLUDING COORDINATING WITH GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES OR COMMUNITY-BASEDCOMMUNITY -BASED ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE CAPABLE OF PROVIDING RESOURCES TO THE DEFENDANT;DEFENDANT ;

(b) IF THE DEFENDANT DOES NOT OBJECT , FACILITATING PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTS OF THE DEFENDANT TO HELP DETERMINE APPROPRIATE LEVELS OF CAR;CARE ;

PAGE 45-SENATE BILL 26-149 (c) IDENTIFYING AND INFORMING THE COURT AND PARTIES OF APPROPRIATE LONG -TERM LEVEL OF CARE RECOMMENDATIONS AND PLACEMENT AVAILABILITY;AVAILABILITY ;

(d) PROVIDINGPROVIDINGTHE THE COURT WITHWITHANINDIVIDUALIZEDRELEASE AN INDIVIDUALIZED RELEASE PLAN DEVELOPEDDEVELOPEDINCONJUNCTIONWITHANYNECESSARYCOMMUNITYPROVIDERS INAND CONJUNCTIONASSISTING WITH ANYTHE NECESSARYREINTEGRATION COMMUNITYOF PROVIDERSANDASSISTINGWITHTHEREINTEGRATIONOFTHEDEFENDANTTHE DEFENDANT INTO THE COMMUNITY WITH APPROPRIATE SERVICE;ANDSERVICES ;AND (e) CCOORDINATING OORDINATING,, AS NEEDED,NEEDED , WITH THE OFFICE OF PUBLIC GUARDIANSHIP ANAPPOINTEDEMERGENCYGUARDIAN,AN ,CDHS,APPOINTED EMERGENCY GUARDIAN , CDHS, HCPF, ORTHEOR THE BHA FORTHEPURPOSEOFPROVIDINGLONG -TERMCONTINUUMOF-TERMCONTINUUMOFCARE CARE FOR THE DEFENDANT.DEFENDANT .

(2) (a) XCEPTEXCEPT WHEN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DDENVER ENVER HAS EXCLUSIVEEXCLUSIVEORIGINALJURISDICTIONOVERTHEAPPOINTMENTOFAGUARDIAN ORIGINAL JURISDICTION OVER THE APPOINTMENT OF A GUARDIAN PURSUANT TO SECTION 9 (3)OF ARTICLEVI OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION,ANYCONSTITUTION , ANY INTERESTED PERSON INCLUDING,INCLUDING THE DEFENDANT S ATTORNEY ,MAY PETITION THE CRIMINAL COURT FOR THE APPOINTMENT OFANEMERGENCYGUARDIANPURSUANTTOSECTIONOF 15-14-312BYFILINGAN -61-EMERGENCY 149GUARDIANPURSUANTTOSECTION APETITIONINTOTHE15-14-312BYFILINGAPETITIONINTOTHE CRIMINALCASECRIMINALCASETHATSATISFIESTHEREQUIREMENTSOFSECTION THATSATISFIESTHEREQUIREMENTS15-14-312. OF SECTION15-14-312.

(b) FITHECITYANDCOUNTYOF THED CITYENVERDOESNOTHAVEEXCLUSIVE ANDORIGINALJURISDICTIONOVERTHEAPPOINTMENTOFAGUARDIANPURSUANT COUNTYTO OFSECTION DENVER9 DOES(3OF NOTARTICLE HAVEVIOF EXCLUSIVETHE ORIGINALSTATE JURISDICTIONCONSTITUTION,THE OVERCOURT THESHALL APPOINTMENTHAVE OFJURISDICTION AOVER GUARDIANTHE PURSUANTPETITION TOAND SECTIONSHALL 9APPOINT (3)OFAN ARTICLEVIEMERGENCY OFGUARDIAN TO THE STATEDEFENDANT CONSTITUTION,THECOURTSHALLHAVEJURISDICTIONOVERTHEPETITIONUPON ANDSHALLAPPOINTANEMERGENCYGUARDIANTOTHEDEFENDANTUPON SATISFACTION OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION15-14-312ANDSECTION THIS15-14-312 SUBSECTIONAND (2).THIS SUBSECTION(2).

(c) ATA T THE NEXT SCHEDULED HEARING IN THE PRESENCE OF THE DEFENDANTFOLLOWINGTHEFILINGOFAPETITIONPURSUANTTOSECTIONDEFENDANT 15-14-312,THEFOLLOWING COURT SHALL NOTIFY THE DEFENDANTFILING THATOF A PETITION FORPURSUANT TO SECTION 15-14-312,THECOURTSHALLNOTIFYTHEDEFENDANTTHATAPETITIONFOR EMERGENCY GUARDIANSHIP HAS BEEN FILED INTO THE CASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 15-14-312AND ADVISE THE DEFENDANT OF THE FOLLOWING :

(I) HEAUTHORITYTHATWOULDBEGRANTEDTOTHEEMERGENCYTHE AUTHORITY THAT WOULD BE GRANTED TO THE EMERGENCY GUARDIAN IF THE PETITION IS GRANT;DGRANTED (II) HETE DEFENDANT S'S RIGHT TO CONTEST THE APPOINTMENT OF AN EMERGENCY GUARDIAN AT A HEARING ;AND PAGE 46-SENATE BILL 26-149 (III) THET HE DEFENDANT S RIGHT TO A FREE ATTORNEY IF THE DEFENDANT CHOOSES TOCONTESTTO CONTEST THE APPOINTMENT OFANEMERGENCYOF AN EMERGENCY GUARDIAN .

(d) NOTWITHSTANDING SECTION 15-14-312,THE COURT:COURT :

(I) SSHALL HALL NOT APPOINT AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT THE DEFENDANT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTESTING THE APPOINTMENT OF AN EMERGENCYGUARDIANUNLESSTHEDEFENDANTWISHESTOCONTESTTHEEMERGENCY APPOINTMENTANDHASNOTRETAINEDANATTORNEYFORTHATPURPOSEGUARDIAN UNLESS THE DEFENDANT WISHES TO CONTEST THE APPOINTMENT AND HAS NOT RETAINED AN ATTORNEY FOR THAT PURPOSE ;

-62- 149 AND (II) SSNOTREQUIREDTOPROVIDETHEDEFENDANTFURTHERNOTICE NOTOF REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE DEFENDANT FURTHER NOTICE OFTHE PETITION BEYOND WHAT ISREQUIREDINTHISSUBSECTIONIS (2).REQUIRED IN THIS SUBSECTION(2).

(e) THE COURT SHALL NOT APPOINT THE OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER OR THE OFFICE OFOFALTERNATE ALTERNATE DEFENSE COUNSELCOUNSELTO TOREPRESENT REPRESENTACRIMINALDEFENDANTRELATEDTOTHEAPPOINTMENTOFANACRIMINALDEFENDANTRELATEDTOTHEAPPOINTMENTOFANEMERGENCY EMERGENCY GUARDIAN OR A MATTER RELATED TO GUARDIANSHIP .

(3) THET HE COURT MAY ENTER LAWFUL ORDERS REQUESTED BY THE DEFENDANT ,THEAPPOINTEDBRIDGESCOURTLIAISON,THE ,ORTHEAPPOINTEDAPPOINTED EMERGENCYBRIDGES GUARDIANCOURT TOLIAISON,OR ASSIST OR FACILITATE THE WORKAPPOINTED OFEMERGENCYGUARDIANTOASSISTORFACILITATETHEWORKOFTHEBRIDGES THE BRIDGES COURT LIAISON OR THE APPOINTED EMERGENCY GUARDIAN .

(4) (a)F(a) THEITHE COURT HAS MADE A FINAL DETERMINATION THAT THE DEFENDANT IS INCOMPETENT TO PROCEED,THEPROCEED ,THE COURT MAY ORDER THECOUNTYATTORNEYTHE TOINITIATEACIVILPROCEEDINGAGAINSTTHECOUNTY DEFENDANTWHILETHECRIMINALPROCEEDINGSAGAINSTTHEDEFENDANTATTORNEY TO INITIATE A CIVIL PROCEEDING AGAINST THE DEFENDANT WHILE THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE DEFENDANT ARE ONGOING IF:

(I) ACOMPETENCYA COMPETENCY EVALUATOR OR A PROFESSIONAL PERSON ,AS, AS DEFINED IN SECTION27-65-102ORSECTION 27-65-102,OR AN INTERVENING PROFESSIONAL,ASPROFESSIONAL DEFINED, INAS SECTION27-65-102,WHODEFINEDINSECTION IS27-65-102,WHOISACTINGWITHINTHESCOPEOFTHEIR ACTINGAUTHORITYANDWHOHASANESTABLISHEDTREATMENTRELATIONSHIPWITH WITHIN THE SCOPEDEFENDANT OF,OPINES THEIRTHAT AUTHORITYTHE ANDDEFENDANT WHOMEETS HAS AN ESTABLISHED TREATMENT RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEFENDANTCRITERIA ,FOR OPINESCERTIFICATION THATFOR THESHORT DEFENDANTTERM MEETSTHECRITERIAFORCERTIFICATIONFORSHORTTREATMENT -TERMTREATMENTOROR LONG TERM-TERM CARE AND TREATMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 27-65-108.3, FORPROTECTIVEPLACEMENTPURSUANTTOSECTIONFOR 25.5-10-502ORFORPROTECTIVE PLACEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 25.5-10-502,OR FOR IMPOSITION OF A LEGAL DISABILITY OR REMOVAL OF A LEGAL RIGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 25.5-10-216ANDPAGE -63-47-SENATE 149BILL 26-149 25.5-10-216;AND (II) ONE OFOFTHE THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS REQUESTS THE COURT TO ORDER THE INITIATION OF A CIVIL PROCEED:NGPROCEEDING (A) THET HE DISTRICT ATTORNEY;

(C) A GUARDIAN ,IF ONE IS APPOINT;D (D) THET HE PROFESSIONAL PERSON OR INTERVENING PROFESSIONAL WHOWHOOPINEDTHEDEFENDANTMEETSTHECRITERIAFORACIVILPROCEEDING OPINED THE DEFENDANT MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR A CIVIL PROCEEDING IF THE PROFESSIONAL PERSONPERSONS S OR INTERVENING PROFESSIONAL S OPINION IS NOT THE RESULT OF WORK PERFORMED AS PART OF EMPLOYMENT OR A CONTRACT WITH THE BHA OR WITH CDHS;

OR (E) AREPRESENTATIVEDESIGNATEDBYTHEA REPRESENTATIVE DESIGNATED BY THE BHA ORWITHOR WITH CDHS TO MAKE A REQUEST .

(b) NOTWITHSTANDINGSUBSECTIONNOTWITHSTANDING (4)(a)(IOFTHISSECTIONSUBSECTION IF(4)(a)(IIOF THIS SECTIO,IF ANY OFTHEOF THE DEFENDANT S CHARGES INCLUDE A FELON,THEFELONY ,THE COURT MAY ORDER THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO INITIATE A CIVILPROCEEDINGCIVIL PROCEEDING ONLY IF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY CONSENTS TO THE INITIATION OF A CIVIL PROCEEDING .

(5) (a) (I)URING(I) DRING THE PENDENCY OF THE CRIMINAL CASE,CASE THE DEFENDANT ,THE DEFENDANT 'STHEDEFENDANT ATTORNEYSATTORNEYINTHECRIMINALCASE IN,ANDTHE THE CRIMINAL CAS,AND THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY IN THE CRIMINAL CASE MAY ACCESS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND RECORDS THAT RELATE TO A CIVIL PROCEEDING INITIATED AGAINST THE DEFENDANT:DEFENDANT :

(A) W HETHER A CIVIL PROCEEDING IS PENDING AGAINST THE DEFENDANT AND ,IF S,THE DATE ANDANDTIME TIMEOFTHE OFCIVILPROCEEDING THE CIVIL PROCEEDING AND THETHEFINALDISPOSITIONOFTHECIVILPROCEEDING FINALREGARDLESSOFWHETHER DISPOSITION OF THE CIVIL PROCEED,REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE CIVIL PROCEEDING IS CONFIDENTIAL OR CLOSED TO THE -64- 149 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OR THE DEFENDANT S'S ATTORNEY IN THE CRIMINAL CASE;AND (B) W HETHERHETHERTHECOURTPREVIOUSLYORDEREDCERTIFICATIONFOR THE COURT PREVIOUSLY ORDERED CERTIFICATION FOR SHORT -TERMTERM TREATMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 27-65-108.5, 27-65-109,OR27-65-109, 27-65-109.5,CERTIFICATIONPAGE 48-SENATE BILL 26-149 OR 27-65-109.5, CERTIFICATION FOR LONGTERMLONG -TERM CARE AND TREATMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 27-65-110PROTECTIVE27-65-110,PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 25.5-10-502,OR IMPOSITION OF A LEGAL DISABILITY OR REMOVAL OF A LEGAL RIGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 25.5-10-216.

(b) IF A PETITION FOR A CIVIL PROCEEDING IS FILED AGAINST THE DEFENDANTDEFENDANTASARESULTOFTHECOURT ASSORDERPURSUANTTOSUBSECTION A(4)(a)OF RESULTTHIS OFSECTION THE,THE COURTPETITIONER 'SSHALL ORDERFILE PURSUANTA TONOTICE SUBSECTION (4)(aOFTHISSECTION ,THEPETITIONERSHALLFILEANOTICE IN THE DEFENDANT'SDEFENDANT S CRIMINAL CAS.CASE .

(6) TTHE HE COURT SHALL ORDER THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO INITIATE A CIVIL PROCEEDING AGAINST THE DEFENDANT AND STAY THE ORDER DISMISSING THE DEFENDANT S CRIMINAL CASE FOR THIRTY-FIVE DAYS IF:I:

(a) THET HE COURT ORDERS DISMISSAL OF THE CASE PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-109 (4), 16-8.5-113 (4)(OR,16-8.5-116OR(4)(b)OR ,IF16-8.5-116, OR, IF THE DEFENDANT IS INCOMPETENT ,THE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY VOLUNTARILY MOVESMOVESTODISMISSTHECASEANDREQUESTSTHECOUNTYATTORNEYORTHE TO DISMISS THE CASE AND REQUESTS THE COUNTY ATTORNEY OR THE APPOINTED EMERGENCY GUARDIAN TO INITIATE A CIVIL PROCEEDING ;

(b) A COMPETENCY EVALUATOR OR A PROFESSIONAL PERSON ,AS -65- 149 DEFINED IN SECTION27-65-102,ORSECTION 27-65-102, OR AN INTERVENING PROFESSIONAL,ASPROFESSIONAL DEFINED,AS INDEFINEDINSECTION SECTION27-65-102,WHO27-65-102, ISWHOISACTINGWITHINTHESCOPEOFTHEIR ACTINGAUTHORITYANDWHOHASANESTABLISHEDTREATMENTRELATIONSHIPWITH WITHIN THE SCOPEDEFENDANT OFOPINES THEIRTHAT AUTHORITYTHE ANDDEFENDANT WHOMEETS HAS AN ESTABLISHED TREATMENT RELATIONSHIPWITHTHEDEFENDANTOPINESTHATTHEDEFENDANTMEETS THE CRITERIA FOR CERTIFICATION FOR SHORT -TERM TREATMENT OR LONG -TERM CARE AND TREATMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 27-65-108.3, FOR PROTECTIVE PLACEMENTPLACEMENTPURSUANTTOSECTION PURSUANT25.5-10-502,ORIMPOSITIONOFALEGAL TO SECTION 25.5-10-502OR IMPOSITION OF A LEGAL DISABILITY OR REMOVAL OF A LEGAL RIGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 25.5-10-216AND25.5-10-216;AND (c) ONEOFTHEFOLLOWINGINDIVIDUALSREQUESTSTHECOURTTOO ORDERNE OF THE INITIATIONFOLLOWING OFINDIVIDUALS AREQUESTS CIVILTHE PROCEED:NGCOURT (I)TO ORDER THE DISTRICTINITIATION ATTORNE;OF A CIVIL PROCEEDING:

(II)(I) TETHE COUNTYDISTRICT ATTORNEY ;

PAGE 49-SENATE BILL 26-149 (II) THE COUNTY ATTORNEY ;

(IV) THET PROFESSIONALPERSONHE PROFESSIONAL PERSON OR INTERVENING PROFESSIONAL WHOWHOOPINEDPURSUANTTOSUBSECTION OPINED(4)(a)(OFTHISSECTIONTHATTHE PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (4)(a)(IOF THIS SECTION THAT THE DEFENDANT MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR A CIVIL PROCEEDING IF THE PROFESSIONALPERSONPROFESSIONAL SORINTERVENINGPROFESSIONALPERSON SOPINIONISNOTS THEOR RESULTINTERVENING OFPROFESSIONAL WORKS PERFORMEDOPINION ASIS PARTNOT OFTHERESULTOFWORKPERFORMEDASPARTOFEMPLOYMENTORACONTRACT EMPLOYMENT OR A CONTRACT WITH THE BHA OR WITH CDHS;

OR (V) AREPRESENTATIVEDESIGNATEDBYTHEA REPRESENTATIVE DESIGNATED BY THE BHA ORWITHOR WITH CDHS TO MAKE A REQUEST .

(7) NOTWITHSTANDINGSUBSECTIONSNOTWITHSTANDING (4ANDSUBSECTIONS (6)OFTHISSECTION,(4)AND IF(6)OF ANTHIS APPOINTEDSECTIO, EMERGENCYIFANAPPOINTEDEMERGENCYGUARDIANBELIEVESINTHEIRPROFESSIONAL GUARDIAN BELIEVES IN THEIR PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT THAT A CIVIL PROCEEDING SHOULD BE INITIATED,THEINITIATED ,THE COURT SHALL ALLOW THE EMERGENCY GUARDIAN TO INITIATE THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGPROCEEDINGINLIEUOFORDERINGTHECOUNTYATTORNEYTOINITIATETHE IN LIEU OF ORDERING THE COUNTY -66- 149 ATTORNEY TO INITIATE THE CIVIL PROCEEDIN.PROCEEDING.

(8) (a) THET HE COURT SHALL GRANT AN UNLIMITED NUMBER OF THIRTYTHIRTY-FIVE-DAY FIVE-DAY EXTENSIONS TO STAY THE ORDER DISMISSING THE DEFENDANT S CASE IF THE DEFENDANT CONSENTS TO THE EXTENSIO.EXTENSION.

(b) IF THE DEFENDANT DOES NOT CONSENT TO AN EXTENSION TO STAY THE ORDER , THE COURT SHALL GRANT NO MORE THAN FOUR ADDITIONAL EXTENSIONS ,SO, SO LONG AS THE TOTAL EXTENSIONS DO NOT EXCEED ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY -FIVE DAYS,I:DAYS,IF:

(I) THET HE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY REQUESTS AN EXTENSION , REGARDLESSOFWHETHERTHEDEFENDANTCONSENTSTOTHEEXTENSIONREGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE DEFENDANT CONSENTS TO THE EXTENSION ;

(II) THE COURT FINDS GOOD CAUSE;AND (III) THEHE DEFENDANT ISISCHARGEDWITHANACT CHARGED WITH AN ACT THAT CONSTITUTES HOMICIDE PURSUANT TO PART 1 OF ARTICLE3ARTICLE 3OF TITLE 18;A CRIME OF TITL18;VIOLENCE ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 18-1.3-406 (2)OR A FELONY THAT CONSTITUTES UNLAWFUL SEXUAL BEHAVIOR ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 16-22-102.

APAGE CRIME50-SENATE OFBILL VIOLENCE26-149 ,(c) ASIF DEFINEDTHE INDEFENDANT SECTION18-1.3-406DOES (2);ORNOT ACONSENT FELONYTHATCONSTITUTESUNLAWFULSEXUALBEHAVIORTO ASDEFINEDINAN SECTIONEXTENSION 16-22-102.TO STAYTHEORDER ,THECOURTSHALLGRANTNOMORETHANONEADDITIONAL EXTENSION ,SOLONGASTHE EXTENSIONDOESNOT EXCEEDSEVENTYDAYS , IF:

(c)(I) IF THE DEFENDANTPROSECUTING DOESATTORNEY NOTREQUESTS CONSENT TO AN EXTENSION TO, STAYREGARDLESS THEOF ORDERWHETHER , THE COURTDEFENDANT SHALLCONSENTS GRANTTO NO MORE THAN ONE ADDITIONAL EXTENSION ,SO LONG AS THE EXTENSION DOES; NOT EXCEED SEVENTY DAYS ,IF:

(I)(II) THE PROSECUTINGCOURT ATTORNEYFINDS REQUESTSGOOD ANCAUSE EXTENSION;AND (III) THE DEFENDANT IS NOT CHARGED WITH A CRIME OF VIOLENCE , REGARDLESSOFWHETHERTHEDEFENDANTCONSENTSTOTHEEXTENSIONAS ;DEFINED IN SECTION 18-1.3-406 (2)OR A FELONY THAT CONSTITUTES UNLAWFUL SEXUAL BEHAVIOR ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 16-22-102.

(II)(d) THEF COURTOR FINDSTHE GOODPURPOSE CAUSE;ANDOF (III)THIS TSUBSECTION HE(8),GOOD DEFENDANTCAUSE ISDOES NOT CHARGEDINCLUDE WITHREFUSAL AOR CRIMEFAILURE OFTO VIOLENCETIMELY ,ASFILE DEFINEDA INPETITION SECTION18-1.3-406FOR (2)OR A FELONYCIVIL THATPROCEEDING CONSTITUTESPURSUANT UNLAWFULTO SEXUALSUBSECTION BEHAVIOR(4) ,ASOF DEFINEDTHIS INSECTION. SECTION 16-22-102.

-67-(e) 149A (d)N FORTHEEXTENSION PURPOSEGRANTED OFTHISPURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (8),GOODCAUSE(8)(b)OR DOES(8)(c)OF NOTINCLUDEREFUSALORFAILURETOTIMELYFILEAPETITIONFORACIVILTHIS PROCEEDINGSECTION IS IN ADDITION TO THE INITIAL STAY AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (4)OF(6)(a)OF THIS SECTION.

(e)(f) ANEXTENSIONGRANTEDPURSUANTTOSUBSECTIONAFTER (8)(bORA (8)(c)OFSTAY OF DISMISSAL ENDS PURSUANT TO THIS SECTIONSUBSECTION IS(8),THE INCOURT ADDITIONSHALL TODISMISS THE INITIALDEFENDANT 'S CRIMINAL CASE UNLESS THE STAY AUTHORIZEDREMAINS IN EFFECT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTIONSECTION (6)(a)OF16-8.5-118.A THISFTERTHEDEFENDANT SECTIO.SCASEISDISMISSED ,THECOURTSHALL NOTIFY CDHS OF THE DISMISSAL ,IN WRITING ,AND THE REASON FOR THE DISMISSAL .

(f)(9) APRIORTOORDERINGTHECOUNTYATTORNEYTOINITIATEACIVIL FTERPROCEEDING A STAY OF DISMISSAL ENDS PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (8)THE(4) COURTOR SHALL(6)OF DISMISSTHIS THE DEFENDANT S CRIMINAL CASE UNLESS THE STAY REMAINS IN EFFECT PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-118.A,THE FTER THE DEFENDANT S CASE IS DISMISSE, THE COURT SHALL NOTIFYCONSIDER CDHSANY OFOBJECTIONS THEFROM DISMISSAL,IN WRITING,AND THE REASONDEFENDANT FOR. THE DISMISSAL.

(9)(10) PRIORIF TOTHE ORDERINGCOURT ORDERS THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO INITIATE A CIVILPROCEEDINGPURSUANTTOSUBSECTIONCIVIL (4)OR(6)OFTHISSECTIONPROCEEDING ,PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (4)OR (6) OF THIS SECTION, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDERSERVE ANYTHE OBJECTIONSCOUNTY FROMATTORNEY THEWITH DEFENDANTA .WRITTEN ORDER THAT :

(10)(a) IFTHECOURTORDERSTHECOUNTYATTORNEYS TOINITIATETATES ATHE CIVILFACTUAL PROCEEDINGAND PURSUANTLEGAL TOBASIS SUBSECTIONFOR (4) OR (6) OF THIS SECTION ,THE COURT SHALL SERVE THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WITH A WRITTEN ORDER THAT; :

(a)PAGE STATES51-SENATE THEBILL FACTUAL26-149 AND(b) LEGALS BASISETS A DEADLINE FOR THE ORDER;COUNTY ATTORNEY TO INITIATE A CIVILPROCEEDING NO LATER THAN TWENTY -ONE DAYS AFTER THE COURT S ORDER ;

(b)(c) SETSIENTIFIESTHESPECIFICCIVILPROCEEDINGSTHECOURTINTENDS A DEADLINE FOR THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO INITIATE A;AND CIVIL(d) PROCEEDINGINCLUDES NOANY LATERORDERS THANTHE TWENTYCOURT -ONEISSUED DAYSPURSUANT AFTERTO THETHIS COURTSECTION. 'S ORDER;

(c)(11) IT DENTIFIESHE COUNTY ATTORNEY OR THE SPECIFICAPPOINTED CIVILEMERGENCY PROCEEDINGSGUARDIAN MAY OBJECT TO THE COURTORDER INTENDSTO INITIATE A CIVIL PROCEEDING WITHINSEVENDAYSAFTERRECEIVINGTHECOURTORDERSERVEDPURSUANT TOSUBSECTION (10)OFTHISSECTIONANDMAYREQUESTAHEARING .IFTHE COUNTY ATTORNEY OR THE APPOINTED EMERGENCY GUARDIAN FILES AN OBJECTION THECOURTSHALLSETAHEARINGFORTHWITHANDRULEONTHE COUNTY ATTORNEY S OBJECTION BY EITHER VACATING , MODIFYING ,OR AFFIRMING THE COURT S ORDER TO INITIAT;INITIATE A CIVIL PROCEEDIN.

AND(12) (d)IF INCLUDESTHE ANYCOURT ORDERS THE COURTCOUNTY ISSUEDATTORNEY PURSUANT TO THISINITIATE SECTIONA .CIVIL PROCEEDING AGAINST THE DEFENDANT :

-68-(a) 149 (11) THE COUNTYCOURT ATTORNEY OR THE APPOINTED EMERGENCY GUARDIAN MAY OBJECT,UPON TO THE ORDERCOURT TO'S INITIATEOWN AMOTION CIVIL,FORGO PROCEEDINGAN WITHINORDERFORRESTORATIONSERVICESANDDISMISSTHECHARGESAGAINSTTHE SEVENDEFENDANT DAYSWITHOUT AFTERPREJUDICE RECEIVINGIF THE COURTDEFENDANT ORDERS SERVEDHIGHEST PURSUANTCHARGED TOOFFENSE SUBSECTIONISAMISDEMEANORTHATISNOTSUBJECTTODISMISSALPURSUANT (10)OFTO THIS SECTION AND16-8.5-109 MAY(4). REQUEST A HEARING .F THE COUNTY ATTORNEY OR THE APPOINTED EMERGENCY GUARDIAN FILES AN OBJECTION ,THE COURT SHALL SET A HEARING FORTHWITHANDRULEONTHECOUNTYATTORNEY SOBJECTIONBYEITHER VACATING ,MODIFYING,ORAFFIRMINGTHECOURT 'SORDERTOINITIATE A CIVIL PROCEEDING.

(12)(b) FTHECOURTORDERSTHECOUNTYATTORNEYT TOINITIATEHE ADISTRICT CIVILATTORNEY PROCEEDINGAND AGAINSTCDHS SHALL TRANSMIT ALL NECESSARY INFORMATION TO THE DEFENDAN:COUNTY ATTORNEY OR THE APPOINTED EMERGENCY GUARDIAN ,INCLUDING THE DEFENDANT S MEDICAL RECORDS , COMPETENCY EVALUATIONS ,MATERIALS USED DURING THE COMPETENCY PROCESS ,AND RESTORATION RECORDS .

(a)(13) IF THE COURT MAY,UPONORDERS THEDISMISSAL COURT'SOF OWNTHE MOTION,FORGOCASE ANPURSUANT ORDERTO FORSECTION RESTORATION16-8.5-109(4),16-8.5-113(4)(bOR SERVICES16-8.5-116;THECOURTDOES ANDNOT DISMISSORDER THE CHARGESCOUNTY AGAINSTATTORNEY THETO DEFENDANTINITIATE WITHOUTA PREJUDICECIVIL IFPROCEEDING ;AND THE DEFENDANTCASE SIS HIGHESTNOT CHARGEDOFFENSEISAMISDEMEANORTHATISNOTSUBJECTTODISMISSALSTAYED PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-10916-8.5-118,THE (4).COURT SHALL DISMISS THE CASE.

(b)PAGE THE52-SENATE DISTRICTBILL ATTORNEY26-149 AND16-8.5-118. CDHS SHALL TRANSMIT ALL NECESSARYINFORMATIONTOTHECOUNTYATTORNEYORTHEAPPOINTED EMERGENCY GUARDIAN ,INCLUDING THE DEFENDANT S MEDICAL RECORDS ,COMPETENCY EVALUATIONS ,MATERIALS USED DURING THE COMPETENCY PROCESS ,AND RESTORATION RECORDS .

(13)Civil FTHEcommitment COURTand ORDERSenhanced DISMISSALprotective OFTHEplacement CASEfor PURSUANTincompetent TOand SECTIONunrestorable 16-8.5-109defendants (4),- 16-8.5-113report (4ORb16-8.5-116;THE- COURTrepeal. DOES NOT ORDER THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO INITIATE A CIVIL PROCEEDING ;AND THE CASE IS NOT STAYED PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-118,HE COURT SHALL DISMISS THE CAS.

16-8.5-118.(1) (a)FTHEDEFENDANTISUNRESTORABLE PURSUANT TOSECTION 16-8.5-113 OR THE DEFENDANT HAS REACHED THE MAXIMUM TIME PERMITTEDTORESTORETHEDEFENDANTPURSUANTTOSECTION 16-8.5-116, THE PROSECUTION MAY NOTIFY THE COURT THAT THE PROSECUTION SEEKS CIVIL COMMITMENT OR ENHANCED PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT OF THE DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION .

Civil(b) commitmentIFTHE andPROSECUTIONVERBALLYNOTIFIESTHE enhancedCOURT protectivePURSUANT -69-TO 149SUBSECTION placement(1)(a)OF forTHIS incompetentSECTION and,THE unrestorableCOURT defendantsSHALL -ORDER reportTHE -PROSECUTION repeal.TO FILE WRITTEN NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE VERBAL NOTIFICATION AND PROVIDE THE NOTICE TO THE PARTIES , CDHS, AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY .

(1)HE (a)NOTICE IFMUST THEINCLUDE DEFENDANT IS UNRESTORABLE PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-113OR THE DEFENDANTACTS HASUPON REACHEDWHICH THE MAXIMUMPROSECUTION TIMEINTENDS PERMITTED TO RESTORERELY THEUPON DEFENDANTAT PURSUANTTRIAL TO SECTION 16-8.5-116,THE PROSECUTION MAY NOTIFY THE COURT THAT THE PROSECUTION SEEKSALLEGES CIVILSATISFY COMMITMENTSUBSECTION OR(6)(bOF ENHANCED PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT OF THE DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.

(b) IF THE PROSECUTION VERBALLY NOTIFIES THE COURT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (1)(aOF THIS SECTION,THE COURT SHALL ORDERNOT THEALLEGE PROSECUTION TO FILE WRITTEN NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE VERBAL NOTIFICATION AND PROVIDE THE NOTICE TO THE PARTIES,CDHS, ANDTHECOUNTYATTORNEY .THENOTICEMUSTINCLUDE THE ACTS UPONFOR WHICH THE PROSECUTION INTENDS TO RELY UPON AT TRIAL THAT THE PROSECUTION ALLEGES SATISFY SUBSECTION(6)(b)OF THISSECTION.THEPROSECUTIONSHALLNOTALLEGEACTSFORWHICHTHE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN ACQUITTED OR CONVICTED .

(c) UPONU PON THE PROSECUTION PROVIDING WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE COURT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (1)(b)OF(1)(b) OF THIS SECTIO,THESECTION, THE COURT SHALL :

(I) STAYSTAYTHE THEORDERDISMISSING ORDER DISMISSING THE DEFENDANT 'SSCRIMINALCASE CRIMINAL CASE ;

(II) STSET A TRIAL WITHIN NINETONENINETY-ONE DAYS AFTER THE DATE THE WRITTENNOTICEWASFILEDORWRITTEN ,WITHBOTHPARTIESNOTICE WAS FILED OR ,WITH BOTH PARTIES 'CONSENT ANYDATE,ANY DATE AGREEABLE TO THE PARTIES;ANDPARTIES ;AND (III) ODERORDER CDHS TO IDENTIFY AN APPROPRIATE PROVIDER AND PLACEMENTPLACEMENTFORTHEDEFENDANTINTHEEVENTACIVILCOMMITMENTORAN FOR THE DEFENDANT IN THE EVENT A CIVILCOMMITMENT OR -70- 149 AN ENHANCED PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT IS GRANTED AND TO KEEP THE COURT INFORMED IN WRITING OF AVAILABLE PLACEMENT OPTION.OPTIONS .

4 (2) ATANYTIMEFOLLOWINGTHEPROSECUTIONA SWRITTENNOTICET ANY TIME FOLLOWING THE PROSECUTION 'S WRITTEN NOTICE PROVIDED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (1)(bOF(1)(b)OF THIS SECTION AND UPON REQUEST OFOFTHE THE DEFENDANT ,THE BRIDGESBRIDGESCOURT COURTLIAISON LIAISO,OR,OR CDHS, THE COURT MAY APPOINT AN EMERGENCY GUARDIAN PURSUANT TO SECTION PAGE 53-SENATE BILL 26-149 16-8.5-117 (2).

(3) TTHECOURTMAYCONTINUETHETRIALFORGOODCAUSESHOWN HE; COURT MAY CONTINUE THE TRIAL FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN ;EXCEPT THAT THE COURT SHALL COMMENCE THE TRIAL WITHIN ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY -TWO DAYS AFTER THE DATE THE PROSECUTION GIVES NOTICE PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION AND CONCLUDE THE TRIAL WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME.

DEXCEPT ELAYSTHAT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE DEFENDANTCOURT ,INCLUDINGSHALL ACOMMENCE REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE TRIAL,MUST BE EXCLUDED FROM THE TIME LIMITS SET FORTH IN THIS SUBSECTION(3).F THE TRIAL IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN THEONE TIMEHUNDRED LIMITSEIGHTY SET-TWO FORTHDAYS INAFTER THIS SUBSEC(3),THE COURT SHALLEND THE STAYDATE AND DISMISS THE CASEPROSECUTION AGAINSTGIVES THENOTICEPURSUANTTOSUBSECTION DEFENDANT(1)OFTHISSECTIONANDCONCLUDETHE IFTRIAL THEWITHIN DEFENDANT FILED A MOTIONREASONABLE TOTIME DISMISS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE TRIAL .

FDELAYS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE DEFENDANT FAILED,INCLUDING TOA FILEREQUEST FOR A MOTIONTODISMISSPRIORTOCOMMENCEMENTOFTHETRIALCONTINUANCE ,THEFAILUREOF TOTHE FILETRIAL A, MOTIONMUST TOBE EXCLUDED FROM THE TIME LIMITS SET FORTH IN THIS SUBSECTION (3).FTHE TRIALISNOT COMMENCEDWITHINTHETIMELIMITSSETFORTHIN THIS SUBSECTION (3),THE COURT SHALL END THE STAY AND DISMISS ISTHE ACASE WAIVERAGAINST OFTHE DEFENDANT IF THE DEFEN'SDEFENDANT RIGHTSFILED PURSUANTA MOTION TO THISDISMISS SUBSECTION(3).PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE TRIAL .

(4)F (a)THE TEDEFENDANT TRIALFAILED MUSTTO BEFILE CIVILA INMOTION NATURETO BUTDISMISS CONDUCTEDPRIOR INTO ACCORDANCECOMMENCEMENT WITHOF THE COLORADOTRIAL, RULESTHE FAILURE TO FILE A MOTION TO DISMISS IS A WAIVER OF EVIDENCETHE .DEFENDANT S RIGHTS PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (3).

A(4) DISTRICT(a) COURTJUDGEOR ,WITHTHECONSENTOFBOTHPARTIES ,ACOUNTYCOURT JUDGE ORAMAGISTRATE ASSIGNED BY THE CHIEFJUDGETRIAL OFTHEMUST JUDICIALBE -71-CIVIL 149IN DISTRICTNATURE SHALLBUT SERVECONDUCTED ASIN THEACCORDANCEWITHTHE FINDERC OFOLORADORULESOFEVIDENCE F.CT.A (b)DISTRICTCOURT (I)JUDGEOR UON,WITHTHECONSENTOFBOTHPARTIES SETTING,ACOUNTYCOURTJUDGEOR THE TRIA, THE COURT SHALL ORDER,IN WRITING,THE EXCHANGE OF RELEVANT DISCOVERY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENSURINGAFAIRANDEXPEDITIOUSTRIALFORBOTHPARTIES INCLUDING , AT A MINIMUMMAGISTRATE ,THEASSIGNED TIMELYBY DISCLOSURE OF THE WITNESSESCHIEF ANDJUDGE EVIDENCE THE PARTIES INTEND TO RELY UPON AT TR.AL (II) THE COURT MAY ORDER THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH RELEVANTPROVISIONSOFRULE 16 OFTHEC OLORADORULESOFCRIMINAL PROCEDURE ,BUTONLYTOTHEEXTENTREASONABLEFORTHECIVILTRIAL AND IN FURTHERANCE OF THE LIMITEDJUDICIAL PURPOSEDISTRICT OFSHALL THISSERVE SECT.ONAS (c) TEPARTIESMAYISSUE SUBPOENASPURSUANTTORULE 17OF THE COLORADOFINDER RULES OF CRIMINALFACT. PROCEDURE TO COMPEL THE ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES AT TRIAL.

(5)(b) (a)(I) TEUPON DEFENDANTSETTING MAYTHE REQUESTTRIAL TO,THE STIPULATECOURT THATSHALL THEORDER COURTORDERCIVILCOMMITMENTORENHANCEDPROTECTIVEPLACEMENT,IN RATHERWRITING THAN,THE CONTESTINGEXCHANGE OF RELEVANT DISCOVERY FOR THE MATTERPURPOSE OF ENSURING A FAIR AND EXPEDITIOUS TRIAL FOR BOTH PARTIES ,INCLUDING , AT A MINIMUM ,THE TIMELY DISCLOSURE OFTHE WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE THE PARTIES INTEND TO RELY UPON AT TRIAL.

(II) THE COURT MAY ORDER THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF RULE 16OF THE COLORADO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ,BUT ONLY TO THE EXTENT REASONABLE FOR THE CIVIL TRIAL AND IN FURTHERANCE OF THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF THIS SECTION .

(c) THE PARTIES MAY ISSUE SUBPOENAS PURSUANT TO RULE 17 OF THE C OLORADO RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE TO COMPEL THE ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES AT TRIAL .

(5) (a) THE DEFENDANT MAY REQUEST TO STIPULATE THAT THE COURT ORDER CIVIL COMMITMENT OR ENHANCED PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT PAGE 54-SENATE BILL 26-149 RATHER THAN CONTESTING THE MATTER AT A TRIAL .

(I) THETECOURTCONFIRMSTHEDEFENDANTHASBEENFULLYADVISED COURT CONFIRMS THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN FULLY ADVISED OF THE CONSEQUENCES AND THE RIGHTS THE DEFENDANT IS WAIVING ,INCLUDING, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO A COURT TRI;LTRIAL; (II) TE STIPULATION IS IN WRITING AND STATED ON THE RECORD ATAHEARINGATWHICHTHEDEFENDANTAPPEARS ,WITHTHECONSENTOF ANY GUARDIAN THAT HAS BEEN APPOINTED;

(III)(II) THETESTIPULATIONISINWRITINGANDSTATEDONTHERECORDAT COURTAHEARINGATWHICHTHEDEFENDANTAPPEARS FINDS,WITHTHECONSENTOFANY THEGUARDIAN DEFENDANT UNDERSTANDS THE STIPULATION AND THAT THEHAS STIPULATIONBEEN ISAPPOINTED VOLUNTARY; DESPITE THE DEFENDANT BEING INCOMPETENT TO PROCEED ;AND -72- 149 (IV) THE PARTIES ESTABLISH A FACTUAL BAS.S (b) A NY STIPULATION OR ADMISSION MADE AS PART OF THE STIPULATIONTOIMPOSEACIVILCOMMITMENTORENHANCEDPROTECTIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT ADMISSIBLE IN ANY FUTURE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION TO PROVE ANY ACT ALLEGED IN THE WRITTEN NOTICE SEEKING THE CIVIL COMMITMENTORENHANCEDPROTECTIVEPLACEMENT .

(6)(III) ATTHE TRIA,THECOURT PROSECUTIONSHALLPROVEBYCLEARANDCONVINCINGEVIDENCETHATFINDS :THE DEFENDANT UNDERSTANDS THE STIPULATION AND THAT THE STIPULATION IS VOLUNTARY DESPITE THE DEFENDANT BEING INCOMPETENT TO PROCEED ;AND (IV) THE PARTIES ESTABLISH A FACTUAL BASIS.

(a)(b) TA HENY DEFENDANTSTIPULATION HASOR ADMISSION MADE AS PART OF THE STIPULATION TO IMPOSE A MENTALCIVIL DISABILITYCOMMITMENT OR DEVELOPMENTALENHANCED DISABILITY;PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT ADMISSIBLE IN ANY FUTURE CRIMINALPROSECUTIONTO PROVE ANY ACT ALLEGED IN THE WRITTEN NOTICE SEEKING THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OR ENHANCED PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT .

(b)(6) (I)A THET DEFENDANTTRIAL, COMMITTED AN ACT THAT ,IN THE ABSENCEPROSECUTION OFSHALL ANYPROVE MENTALBY DISABILITYCLEAR ORAND DEVELOPMENTALCONVINCING DISABILITY,EVIDENCE WOULDTHAT CONSTITUTE :

(A)(a) HOMICIDETHEDEFENDANTHASAMENTALDISABILITYORDEVELOPMENTAL PURSUANTDISABILITY; TO PART 1OF ARTICLE3 OF TITL18;

(B)(b) ACRIMEOFVIOLENCE(I) ASDEFINEDINSECTIONTE 18-1.3-406(2);DEFENDANT COMMITTED AN ACT THAT ,IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY MENTAL DISABILITY OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY , WOULD CONSTITUTE :

OR(A) (C)H AFELONYTHATCONSTITUTESUNLAWFULSEXUALBEHAVIOROMICIDE ,PURSUANT AS DEFINED IN SECTIO16-22-102;AND (II) TEACTDESCRIBEDINSUBSECTION (6)(b)(IOFTHISSECTION THAT THE DEFENDANT IS ALLEGED TO HAVEPART COMMITTED1OF ISARTICLE OR3OF WASTITLE18; CHARGEDINACRIMINALCASEIN C OLORADOINWHICHCOMPETENCYWAS RAISED;AND (c) TEDEFENDANTPOSESASUBSTANTIALRISKOFSERIOUSHARM TO OTHERS.

(7)(a)(B) WHENDETERMININGWHETHERTHEPROSECUTIONHASMET ITS BURDEN PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION(6)(b)OF THIS SECTI:N (I) TE DEFENDANT IS NOT PERMITTED TO RAI,AND THE COURT SHALL NOT CONSIDER, A DEFENSECRIME BASEDOF ONVIOLENCE A,AS MENTAL DISABILITY OR -73- 149 DEVELOPMENTALDISABILITY ,INCLUDINGAMENTALDISEASE ORDEFECT , AS DEFINED IN SECTIONSECTION18-1.3-406 16-8-102,INCLUDING,BUT(2); NOT LIMITED TO ,A DEFENSE RAISED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 8 OF TITLE16OR ANY DEFENSE THAT IS AN ELEMENT-NEGATINGTRAVERSE BASEDONAMENTALDISEASE OR DEFECT ;

(II)OR TEDEFENDANTISNOTPERMITTEDTORAISE(C) ,ANDTHECOURTA SHALLFELONYTHATCONSTITUTESUNLAWFULSEXUALBEHAVIOR NOT,AS CONSIDERPAGE ,A55-SENATE DEFENSEBILL OF26-149 INTOXICATION , AS DEFINED IN SECTIONSECTION16-22-102; 18-1-804,EXCEPTFORINTOXICATIONTHATISNOTSELF INDUCED PURSUANT TO SECTION 18-1-804 (3)AND (III) THE DEFENDANT IS PERMITTED TO RAISE OTHER DEFENSES THAT ARE NOT BASED ON A MENTAL DISABILITY OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY,INCLUDINGAFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ,EXCEPT ASPROVIDEDIN THIS SUBSECTION (7).

(b)AND W(II) HENTHE DETERMININGACT WHETHERDESCRIBED TOIN PERMITSUBSECTION A(6)(b)(IOF DEFENDANT TO RAISE A DEFENSE PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION(7),THESECTION COURTTHATTHEDEFENDANTISALLEGEDTOHAVECOMMITTEDISORWASCHARGED SHALLINACRIMINALCASEIN CONSIDERCOLORADOINWHICHCOMPETENCYWASRAISED THE;AND NEED(c) TO ENSURE FAIRNESS AND DUE PROCESS TO BOTH PARTIES WITHOUT FRUSTRATING THE INTENDEDDEFENDANT FUNCTIONINGPOSES ANDA LIMITEDSUBSTANTIAL PURPOSERISK OF THESERIOUS CIVILHARM PROCEEDIN.TO OTHERS .

(c)(7) THEPROSECUTIONSHALLNOTALLEGE(a) ,ANDTHECOURTSHALLWHEN NOTDETERMINING CONSIDERWHETHER ,AN ACT OR SERIES OF ACTS FOR WHICH THE DEFENDANTPROSECUTION WASACQUITTEDORCONVICTEDASTHEQUALIFYINGACTSSATISFYINGTHEHAS CRITERIAMET LISTEDITS INBURDEN SUBSECTIO(6)(b)OFPURSUANT THISTO SECTIO,BUTSUBSECTION THE(6)(b)OF COURT MAY ADMIT EVIDENCE OF AN ACT OR A SERIES OF ACTS FOR WHICH THE DEFENDANT WAS ACQUITTED OR CONVICTED IF OTHERWISE ADMISSIBLE PURSUANTTOTHE COLORADORULESOFEVIDENCEANDRELEVANTTOTHE CRITERIA LISTED IN SUBSECTIO(6)(a)OR (6)(cOF THIS SECTIO.SECTION:

(d) (I) P RIOR TO TRIAL, THE COURTDEFENDANT SHALLIS FINDNOT THATPERMITTED THETO -74-RAISE 149,AND PROSECUTION HAS MET THE REQUIREMENTSCOURT INSHALL SUBSECTION(6)(b)(IIOFNOT THISCONSIDER SECTION,A IFDEFENSE ANBASED ACTON ALLEGEDA TOMENTAL SATISFYDISABILITY THEOR REQUIREMENTDEVELOPMENTALDISABILITY OF,INCLUDINGAMENTALDISEASEORDEFECT SUBSECTION,AS (6)(b)(IOFDEFINEDINSECTION THIS16-8-102,INCLUDING SECTION,BUTNOTLIMITEDTO :S,ADEFENSE (A)RAISED CPURSUANT HARGEDTO INARTICLE THE8OF CURRENTTITLE CASE;OR16OR (B)ANY CHARGEDDEFENSE INTHAT ANOTHERIS PENDINGAN CASEELEMENT IN-NEGATING THETRAVERSE SAMEBASED JURISDICTIONON ANDA COMPETENCYMENTAL WASDISEASE RAISEDOR INDEFECT THE; CAS.

(II) PIORTOTRIAL,THECOURTMAYFINDTHATTHEPROSECUTIONTHE HASDEFENDANT METIS NOT PERMITTED TO RAISE ,AND THE REQUIREMENTSCOURT INSHALLNOTCONSIDER SUBSECTION,ADEFENSEOFINTOXICATION (6)(b)(IOF,ASDEFINEDINSECTION THIS18-1-804,EXCEPTFORINTOXICATIONTHATISNOTSELF INDUCEDPURSUANT TO SECTION IF:18-1-804 (3)AND (III) HEDEFENDANTISPERMITTEDTORAISEOTHERDEFENSESTHAT ARE NOT BASEDONAMENTALDISABILITYORDEVELOPMENTALDISABILITY , INCLUDING AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES , EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN THIS SUBSECTION (7).

(A)(b) W ITHOUTHEN ADMITTINGDETERMINING WHETHER TO COMMITTINGPERMIT ANYA ACTS , THE DEFENDANT STIPULATESTO THERAISE DEFENDANTA WASDEFENSE CHARGEDPURSUANT WITHTO ANTHIS ACT THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION (6)(b)(IIOF(7),THE THISCOURT SECTION;ORSHALL (B)CONSIDER THE PROSECUTIONNEED FILESTO WITHENSURE THEFAIRNESS COURTAND CERTIFIEDDUE COURTPROCESS RECORDSTO FROMBOTH ANOTHERPARTIESWITHOUTFRUSTRATINGTHEINTENDEDFUNCTIONINGANDLIMITED CRIMINALCASEPURPOSE ,CURRENTOF OR DISMISSE,THAT DEMONSTRATE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE REQUIREMENTSOFSUBSECTIONCIVIL (6)(b)(IOFTHISSECTIONARESATISFIED.PROCEEDING.

(8)(c) (a)THE PRIORPROSECUTION TOSHALL TRIAL,NOT ALLEGE ,AND THE COURT SHALL REQUIRENOTCONSIDER THE,ANACTORSERIESOFACTSFORWHICHTHEDEFENDANTWAS DEFENDANTACQUITTED TOOR STATECONVICTED WHETHERAS THE DEFENDANTQUALIFYING CONTESTSACTS THATSATISFYING THE DEFENDANTCRITERIA HASLISTED IN SUBSECTION (6)(b)OF THIS SECTION,BUT THE COURT MAY ADMIT EVIDENCE OF AN ACT OR A MENTALDISABILITYSERIES OF ACTS FOR WHICH THE PAGE 56-SENATE BILL 26-149 DEFENDANT WAS ACQUITTED OR DEVELOPMENTALCONVICTED DISABILITY.IF OTHERWISE ADMISSIBLE PURSUANT TO THE COLORADO RULES OF EVIDENCE AND RELEVANT TO THE CRITERIA LISTED IN SUBSECTION(6)(a)OR (6)(cOF THIS SECTION.

(b)(d) I(I) THEPRIOR DEFENDANTTO DOESTRIAL NOT, CONTEST THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS A MENTAL DISABILITY OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILIT,THE COURT SHALL TREATFIND THIS FACT AS PROVEN AND SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE PROSECUTION TO PRODUCE ANY EVIDENCE TO PROVE THE FACT AT TRI.L (c) (I) IHE DEFENDANT CONTESTS THAT THE DEFENDANTPROSECUTIONHASMETTHEREQUIREMENTSINSUBSECTION HAS(6)(b)(IOFTHIS ASECTIONIFANACTALLEGEDTOSATISFYTHE MENTALREQUIREMENT DISABILITYOFSUBSECTION OR(6)(b)(IOF DEVELOPMENTALTHIS DISABILITY,THESECTION COURTI: SHALL REVIEW THE RECORD AND DETERMINE IF THE DEFENDANT OR DEFENSE -75- 149 COUNSEL RAISED THE ISSUE OF THE DEFENDANT BEING INCOMPETENT OR FAILED TO OBJECT TO A FINDING THAT THE DEFENDANT IS INCOMPETEN.

(II)(A) IC THEHARGED COURTIN FINDS THE DEFENDANTCURRENT ORCASE DEFENSE;OR COUNSEL(B) RAISEDTHECHARGEDINANOTHERPENDINGCASEINTHESAMEJURISDICTION ISSUEAND OFTHECOMPETENCY DEFENDANTBEINGWAS INCOMPETENTORFAILEDRAISED TOIN OBJECTTOAFINDINGTHATTHEDEFENDANTISINCOMPETENT ,THECOURT SHALL FIND THE DEFENDANTCASE HAS PREVIOUSLY STIPULATED THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS A MENTAL DISABILITY OR DEVELOPMENTALDISABILITY .

IFTHE(II) COURTPIOR MAKESAFINDINGTO ,THETRIAL,THE COURT SHALLFINDMAY THEFIND DEFENDANT HAS STIPULATED THAT THE DEFENDANTPROSECUTION HAS AMET MENTALTHE DISABILITYREQUIREMENTS ORIN DEVELOPMENTALDISABILITYANDFINDINFAVOROFTHEPROSECUTIONAT TRIAL WITH REGARD TO SUBSECTION (6)(a)OF(6)(b)(IOF THIS SECTIO.SECTION I:

(III)(A) IFW THEITHOUT COURTADMITTING FINDSTO THATCOMMITTING THEANY PROSECUTIONACTS OR, COURTTHE RAISEDDEFENDANTSTIPULATESTHEDEFENDANTWASCHARGEDWITHANACTTHAT MEETS THE ISSUEREQUIREMENTS OF COMPETENCYSUBSECTION OVER(6)(b)(IIOF THETHIS DEFENDANTSECTION;OR S(B) OBJECTIONT ANDHE PROSECUTION FILES WITH THE DEFENDANTCOURT CONSISTENTLYCERTIFIED MAINTAINEDCOURT ANRECORDS OBJECTIONFROM BYANOTHER ARGUINGTHEDEFENDANTISCOMPETENTTOPROCEEDCRIMINAL ,THEPROSECUTIONCASE HAS,CURRENT THEOR BURDENDISMISSED TO,THAT PROVEDEMONSTRATE BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFENDANTREQUIREMENTS HASOF A MENTAL DISABILITY OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (6)(aOF(6)(b)(IIOF THIS SECTIO.SECTION ARE SATISFIE.

(d)(8)(a) PRIORTOTRIAL ,THECOURTSHALLREQUIRETHEDEFENDANT TO STATE WHETHER THE DEFENDANT CONTESTS THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS A TMENTAL TRIA,THEDISABILITY COURTOR :DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY .

(I)(b) SHALLIF ADMITTHE ANYDEFENDANT COMPETENCYDOES REPORTSNOT ANDCONTEST ANYTHAT TRANSCRIPTSTHE OFDEFENDANT PRIORHAS COMPETENCYA MENTAL DISABILITY OR RESTORABILITYDEVELOPMENTAL HEARINGSDISABILITY SO,THE LONGCOURT SHALL TREAT THIS FACT AS THEPROVEN COMPETENCYAND EVALUATORSHALL WHONOT COMPLETEDREQUIRE THE REPORTPROSECUTION ISTO AVAILABLEPRODUCE FORANY CROSSEVIDENCE EXAMINATIONTO ;PROVE THE FACT AT TRIAL .

(II)(c) MAYTAKE(I) JUDICIALNOTICEI OFANYTHE PRIORDEFENDANT FINDINGCONTESTS THAT THE DEFENDANT ISHAS INCOMPETENTA TOMENTAL PROCEEDDISABILITY ANDOR THEDEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDDISABILITY OF,THE PROOFCOURT TOSHALL WHICHREVIEW THE PRIORRECORD FINDINGAND WASDETERMINE MADE;ANDIF (III)THE SUBJECTDEFENDANT TOOR CONSTITUTIONALDEFENSE LIMITATIONSCOUNSEL ANDRAISED THE -76-ISSUE 149OF CTHE OLORADODEFENDANT RULESBEING OFINCOMPETENT EVIDENCEOR ,SHALLFAILED ALLOWTO ADMISSIONOBJECT OFTO ANYA EVIDENCEFROMPRIORCOURTPROCEEDINGSTHATBEARONTHEQUESTIONFINDING OFTHAT WHETHER THE DEFENDANT HASIS AINCOMPETENT. MENTAL DISABILITY OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY .

(9)PAGE A57-SENATE TBILL TRIA,26-149 WHEN(II) DETERMININGIF WHETHERTHE COURT FINDS THE DEFENDANT POSESOR ADEFENSE SUBSTANTIALCOUNSEL RISKRAISED THE ISSUE OF SERIOUSTHE HARMDEFENDANT BEING INCOMPETENT OR FAILED TO OTHERSOBJECT TO A FINDING THAT THE DEFENDANT IS INCOMPETENT , IFTHE COURT SHALL FIND THE DEFENDANTISINCUSTODYORATTHESTATEHOSPITALDEFENDANT ,THECOURTSHALLHAS ASSESSTHEPREVIOUSLY STIPULATED THAT THE DEFENDANT ASIFTHEDEFENDANTWEREINTHECOMMUNITYHASAMENTALDISABILITYORDEVELOPMENTALDISABILITY ..IF THE COURT MAKESAFINDING THE COURT SHALLFIND THE DEFENDANT HAS STIPULATED THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS A MENTAL DISABILITY OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY AND FIND IN FAVOR OF THE PROSECUTION AT TRIAL WITH REGARD TO SUBSECTION (6)(aOF THIS SECTION.

T(III) HEITHE COURT SHALLFINDSTHAT NOT FIND THE DEFENDANTPROSECUTION DOES NOT POSE A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF SERIOUS HARM TO OTHERS MERELY BECAUSE THE DEFENDANT IS IN CUSTODY OR AT THE STATE HOSPIT.L (10) IF THE COURT FINDSRAISED THAT THE PROSECUTIONISSUE DID NOT MEETONEORMOREOFTHEREQUIREMENTSDESCRIBEDINSUBSECTION (6) OF THISCOMPETENCY SECTIO,THEOVER COURT SHALL DENY THE PROSECUTION'SDEFENDANT REQUEST'S TOOBJECTION CIVILLYAND COMMIT OR ORDER THE ENHANCED PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT OF THE DEFENDANT ANDCONSISTENTLY SHALLMAINTAINED DISMISSAN THEOBJECTION DEFENDAN'SBY CAS;EXCEPTARGUING THAT THE COURTDEFENDANTISCOMPETENTTOPROCEED MAY,THEPROSECUTIONHASTHEBURDEN CONSIDERTOPROVEBYCLEARANDCONVINCINGEVIDENCETHATTHEDEFENDANTHAS WHETHERA TOMENTAL ORDERDISABILITY OTHEROR CIVILDEVELOPMENTAL PROCEEDINGSDISABILITY PURSUANT TO SECTIONSUBSECTION 16-8.5-117.(6)(a)OF THIS SECTION.

(11)(d) (a)AT FTRIAL,THE THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PROSECUTION MET THE REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (6)OF THIS SECTION, THE COURT SHALL :

(I) ORDERSALLADMITANYCOMPETENCYREPORTSANDANYTRANSCRIPTS THEOF CIVILPRIOR COMMITMENTCOMPETENCY OR ENHANCEDRESTORABILITY PROTECTIVEHEARINGS PLACEMENTSO OFLONG AS THE DEFENDANTCOMPETENCYEVALUATORWHOCOMPLETEDTHEREPORTISAVAILABLEFOR INCROSS ACCORDANCEEXAMINATION WITH; SUBSECTION (12) OF THIS SECTIO;

(II) PLACEMAY THETAKE DEFENDANTJUDICIAL ANDNOTICE ISSUEOF ANY RELATEDPRIOR ORDERSFINDING PURSUANTTHAT TOTHE SUBSECTIONDEFENDANTISINCOMPETENTTOPROCEEDANDTHESTANDARDOFPROOFTO (13)OFWHICH THISTHE SECTIO;ANDPRIOR (III)FINDING TRANSFERWAS JURISDICTIONMADE OF;AND THE(III) CIVILUBJECTTOCONSTITUTIONALLIMITATIONSANDTHE COMMITMENTCOLORADO ORRULES -77-OF 149EVIDENCE ENHANCED,SHALL PROTECTIVEALLOW PLACEMENTADMISSION TOOF ANANY APPROPRIATEEVIDENCE CIVILFROM COURTPRIORCOURT WITHPROCEEDINGSTHATBEARONTHE JURISDICTIONQUESTIONOFWHETHERTHE ANDDEFENDANT DISMISSHAS THEA CASEMENTAL INDISABILITY ACCORDANCEOR WITHDEVELOPMENTAL SUBSECTIONDISABILITY (14)OF. THIS SECTIO.

(b)(9) TECOURTHASSEVENTYDAYSTOPLACETHEDEFENDANTANDATTRIAL TRANSFERJURISDICTIONTOTHEAPPROPRIATECIVILCOURTWHENDETERMININGWHETHERTHEDEFENDANTPOSES ;EXCEPTTHATASUBSTANTIALRISK OFSERIOUS HARM TO OTHERS ,IFTHE DEFENDANT ISIN CUSTODY OR AT THE COURTSTATE MAYHOSPITAL EXTEND, THE TIMECOURT LIMITSHALL WITHASSESS THE CONSENTDEFENDANT OFAS IF THE DEFENDANT WERE IN THE COMMUNITY .

HETHE COURT SHALL ORDERNOT THEFIND PLACEMENT AND TRANSFER JURISDICTION AS SOON AS PRACTICAB.E (12) (a) I THE COURTDEFENDANT FINDSDOES THATNOT THEPOSE PROSECUTION MET THE REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION(6)OFTHISSECTION OR IFTHE COURTACCEPTSTHEDEFENDANT SSTIPULATIONTOCIVILCOMMITMENTOR ENHANCED PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT ,THE COURT SHALLMAKE A FINDINGSUBSTANTIAL RISK OF THESERIOUSHARMTOOTHERSMERELYBECAUSETHEDEFENDANTISINCUSTODY DEFENDANTPAGE S58-SENATE PRIMARYBILL DIAGNOSIS26-149 THAT CONSTITUTES THE MENTAL DISABILITY OR DEVELOPMENTALAT DISABILIT.THE COURT SHALL ORDER THE DEFENDANTSTATE CIVILLYHOSPITAL. COMMITTED TO THE LEGAL CUSTODY OF CDHS AND SUPERVISED PURSUANT TO SECTION27-65-201,UNLESS THE DEFENDANT S PRIMARY DIAGNOSIS IS AN INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTALDISABILITYORANEUROCOGNITIVEDISORDER ASTHOSE TERMSARE DEFINEDINSECTION 25.5-10-501INWHICHCASE ,THE COURT SHALL ORDER AN ENHANCED PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT AND LEGAL CUSTODY OF THE DEFENDANT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING AND SUPERVISED PURSUANT TO SECTION 25.5-10-507.

T(10) ANYITHECOURTFINDSTHATTHEPROSECUTIONDIDNOTMEETONE TIMEOR PRIORMORE TOOF TRANSFERRINGTHE JURISDICTIONREQUIREMENTS TODESCRIBED AIN CIVILSUBSECTION COURT,THE(6)OF THIS SECTION,THE COURT MAY,UPONSHALLDENYTHEPROSECUTION A'SREQUEST RECOMMENDATIONTOCIVILLY FROMCOMMIT CDHS,OR CHANGETHEDESIGNATIONOFTHEPRIMARYDIAGNOSISANDCONVERTTHEORDER ORDERTOCIVILCOMMITMENTORENHANCEDPROTECTIVEPLACEMENTTHE ,ASENHANCED APPROPRIATE,BASEDPROTECTIVE ONPLACEMENT OF THE DETERMINATIONDEFENDANTANDSHALLDISMISSTHEDEFENDANT OF'SCASE CDHS.EXCEPTTHATTHE COURT MAY CONSIDER WHETHER TO ORDER OTHER CIVIL PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 16-8.5-117.

-78-(11) 149 (b) THECOURT SHALLISSUEITSFINDINGSANDORDERSPURSUANT TOTHISSECTIONINWRITING .W HENTHECOURTTRANSFERSJURISDICTION TOACIVILCOURT PURSUANT TOSECTION 27-65-113OR 25.5-10-509THE COURT SHALL SEND THE CIVIL COURT RECEIVING JURISDICTION ALL THE WRITTEN FINDINGS AND ORDERS ENTERED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTI.N (13) (a) WHENIF THE COURT ORDERSFINDS A CIVIL COMMITMENT OR ENHANCED PROTECTIVE PLACEMENT ,IFCDHS PROPOSES PLACING THE DEFENDANT INTO INPATIENT CARE,THE COURT SHALL ORDER,WITHOUT FURTHER COURT REVIEW THE DEFENDANT PLACED INTO INPATIENT CARE ATTHEDISCRETIONOF CDHS.I FCDHS HASIDENTIFIEDANAPPROPRIATE PROVIDER THAT DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITIONPROSECUTION OFINPATIENTMET CARE BUT IS WILLING AND ABLE TO ACCEPT PLACEMENT OF THE DEFENDANT,THEREQUIREMENTSDESCRIBEDINSUBSECTION COURT(6)OFTHISSECTION ,THECOURT SHALL SET: A REVIEW HEARING AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE WHILE ENSURING THE PARTIES,ANY APPOINTED EMERGENCY GUARDIAN , AND VICTIMS ARE GIVEN SUFFICIENT NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO PREPARE AND APPEAR .