SB 135 — State Public K-12 Education Funding
Last action — Signed by the President of the Senate
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 05, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jared Polis (Democratic) on May 20, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
55 sponsors
42 primary, 13 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (20 D).
-
Mixed recorded votes
12 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill seeks voter approval to increase K-12 education funding in Colorado for the next ten years.
This legislation requires a ballot issue in November 2026 to allow the state to retain additional revenue to fund K-12 education. It plans to increase education funding by up to 2% per year for the next decade.
What this means for you
- Workers: This bill may lead to increased teacher pay and better working conditions in schools.
Summary
The act requires the secretary of state to refer a ballot issue at the November 2026 general election to seek voter approval for the state, beginning in the 2026-27 state fiscal year, to retain and spend an amount of state revenue equal to the amount of state public K-12 education funding in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending and to increase state public K-12 education funding by up to 2% per year for 10 years. The act directs legislative council staff to determine the amount of state public K-12 education funding and describes how legislative council staff will make that determination. The act creates a positive factor to increase state public K-12 education funding. The amount of the positive factor compounds annually for 10 years. The positive factor for the 2026-27 budget year is 2% of the program foundation calculated for the 2025-26 budget year. For the 2027-28 through 2034-35 budget years, it is the sum of 2% of the prior year's program foundation plus the prior year's positive factor. For the 2035-36 budget year and beyond, it is the sum of 2% of the 2034-35 program foundation plus the 2034-35 positive factor. A district's share of the positive factor is calculated proportionally based on the district's total program under the new school finance formula relative to the statewide total program. A district may only use its positive factor funding for increasing teacher pay, improving teacher retention, lowering class sizes, and increasing access to career and technical courses. For the 2026-27 state fiscal year, the children's account consists of an amount of money equal to the amount of state revenues that the state retains for a given fiscal year pursuant to voter approval of the act. For state fiscal years commencing on or after July 1, 2027, the account consists of that same amount minus an amount equal to the total dollar amount of warrants issued by the state treasurer to reimburse local governments for property tax exemptions. Money in the account must first be spent to pay districts their positive factor, then any remaining funds are appropriated for disability services and school services and to increase annual contact hours, and finally to programs prioritizing child care and full-day preschool. The act directs the state auditor to conduct and publish a report on excess state revenues for each state fiscal year that the state retains and spends state revenues in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending. That report must include descriptions of:The amount of state revenues that the state retained and spent that would otherwise have been in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending; andHow the state expended the state revenues that the state retained and spent that would otherwise have been in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending. Beginning August 1, 2027, the act requires each local education provider to post, online for free public access in a format that can be downloaded and sorted, its actual expenditures of any positive factor received. Lastly, the act updates provisions regarding the expanded earned income tax credit, the family affordability tax credit, and the affordable housing financing fund to ensure that voter approval of the act does not adversely impact those programs.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
375 added · 466 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to SB 135 include a new note indicating that the bill is ready for the signatures of legislative officers and the Governor, and that the public can check the legislative status for updates on the bill's progress. This addition is important because it clarifies the next steps in the legislative process, ensuring transparency about whether the Governor has signed the bill or taken other actions. Overall, these modifications help readers understand the current status and significance of the bill concerning K-12 education funding in Colorado.
SecondNOTE: Regular Session Seventy-fifth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO REREVISED This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the Second House LLS NO.
26-0140.05This Piercebill Livelyhas x2059been SENATEprepared BILLfor 26-135the SENATEsignatures SPONSORSHIPof Bridgesthe andappropriate Kipp,legislative Amabile,officers Benavidez, Coleman, Cutter, Danielson, Daugherty, Exum, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen, Jodeh, Kolker, Lindstedt, Marchman, Mullica, Rodriguez, Snyder, Sullivan, Weissman, Wallace HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Bacon and Lukens,the Boesenecker,Governor. Camacho, Carter, Duran, Goldstein, Hamrick, Joseph, Lieder,Lindsay,Martinez,McCormick,Nguyen,Paschal,Phillips,Rydin,Smith,StewartR., Titone,Velasco,Willford,Clifford,English,Espenoza,Froelich,Gilchrist,Jackson,Mauro, McCluskie, Ricks, Rutinel, Stewart K., Story i a 6 E R 0 S r , O 3 9 H e a Senate Committees House Committees n M Finance Appropriations e Appropriations A g A BILL FOR AN ACT d 6 E e 0 C ONCERNING STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION K-12 FUNDING , AND , IN U R ,2 O n y8 CONNECTION THEREWITH , INCREASING APPROPRIATIONS FOR H 2 a e M STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION K-12 FOR TEN YEARS , n m ALLOWING THE STATE TO RETAIN AN AMOUNT OF STATE A REVENUEINEXCESSOFTHELIMITATIONONSTATEFISCALYEAR SPENDING EQUAL TO STATE PUBLIC K-12 EDUCATION FUNDING , e n AND SUBMITTING A BALLOT QUESTION TO THE REGISTERED m 2 T n 2 ELECTORS OF THE STATE .
NTo gdetermine 7whether Ethe dGovernor ihas Ssigned ethe pbill Ror Ataken Billother Summaryaction 3on (Note:it, please consult the legislative status sheet, the legislative history, or the Session Laws.
ThisSENATE summaryBILL applies26-135 toBY thisSENATOR(S) billBridges as introduced and doesKipp, notreflectanyamendmentsthatmaybesubsequentlyadopted.IfthisbillAmabile, gBenavidez, passesColeman, thirdCutter, readingDanielson, inDaugherty, theExum, houseGonzales ofJ., introduction,Hinrichsen, aJodeh, billKolker, summaryLindstedt, thatMarchman, dMullica, eRodriguez, 6Snyder, appliesSullivan, toWeissman, theWallace; reengrossed version of this bill will be available at E R 0 A n , N 2 2 Shading denotes HOUSE amendment.
Doublealso underliningREPRESENTATIVE(S) denotesBacon SENATEand amendment.Lukens, Boesenecker, Camacho, Carter, Duran, Goldstein, Hamrick, Joseph, Lieder, Lindsay, Martinez, McCormick, Nguyen, Paschal, Phillips, Rydin, Smith, Stewart R., Titone, Velasco,Willford,Clifford,English,Espenoza,Froelich,Gilchrist,Jackson, Mauro, Ricks, Rutinel, Stewart K., Story, McCluskie.
SCONCERNING eSTATE rPUBLIC CapitalEDUCATION lettersK-12 orFUNDING bold, &AND italic, numbersIN indicateCONNECTION newTHEREWITH material,INCREASING toAPPROPRIATIONS beFOR addedSTATE toPUBLIC existingEDUCATION law.nK-12 ApFOR DashesTEN throughYEARS the,ALLOWING wordsTHE orSTATE numbersTO indicateRETAIN deletionsAN fromAMOUNT existingOF law.STATE REVENUE IN EXCESS OF THE LIMITATION ON STATE FISCAL YEAR SPENDING EQUAL TO STATE PUBLIC K-12 EDUCATION FUNDING ,AND SUBMITTING A BALLOT QUESTION TO THE REGISTERED ELECTORS OF THE STATE .
m A http://leg.colorado.gov.) The bill requires the secretaryof state to refer a ballot issue at the November 2026 general election to seek voter approval for the state to retain and spend an amount of state revenue equal to the amount of state public K-12 education funding in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending and to increase state public K-12 education funding byup to 2% for 10 years.
The bill directs legislative council staff to determine the amount of state public K-12 education funding and describes how legislative council staff will make that determination.
The bill creates a positive factor to provide additional funding for each district.
A positive factor is equal to the lesser of 2% of statewide total program funding for the 2026-27 budget year multiplied by a district's total program as a percentage of the statewide total program or the amount that the state is authorized to retain and spend that would otherwise have been in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending multiplied by a district's total program as a percentage of the statewide total program.
A district may only use its positive factor fundingforincreasingteacherpay,improvingteacherretention,lowering class sizes, and increasing access to career and technical courses.
Thebillcreatestheexcessstaterevenuesaccount(account)within the general fund.
The account consists of an amount of money equal to the amount of state revenues in excess of the excess state revenues cap that the state retains for a given fiscal year pursuant to voter approval of thebill.Moneyintheaccountmustfirstbespentforpayingdistrictstheir positive factor and only after that may be spent for any other purpose.
The bill directs the state auditor to conduct and publish, for each state fiscal year that the state retains and spends state revenues in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending, a legislative report.
That report must include descriptions of:
! The amount of state revenues that the state retained and spent that would otherwise have been in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending;
and ! Howthestaterevenuesthatthestateretainedandspentthat would otherwise have been in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending were expended.
Lastly,thebillmakesconformingamendmentstoensurethatvoter approval of the bill does not impact the expanded earned income tax credit, the family affordability tax credit, or the affordable housing financing fund.
-2-SECTION 1351. SECTION1.
Legislativedeclaration.(1)Legislative Thegeneralassemblydeclaration. finds and declares that:
(a)(1) PublicThe educationgeneral isassembly thefinds bedrock of Colorado's democracy, fundamental to individual opportunity, the underpinning of thriving communities, and thedeclares keythat: to Colorado's economic prosperityand future;
(b)________ WiseCapital andletters adequateor investmentbold in& Colorado'sitalic schoolsnumbers isindicate essentialnew tomaterial maintainingadded andto improvingexisting thelaw; competitiveness of Colorado and its students;
(c)dashes Thethrough moneyinvestedwords inor Colorado'snumbers publicindicate schoolsdeletions hasfrom aexisting returnlaw onand investmentsuch thatmaterial hasis longnot beenpart recognizedof as among the nation'sact. highest;
(d)(a) AnPublic increaseeducation inis the ratesbedrock of K-12Colorado's graduation,democracy, fundamental to individual opportunity, the earningunderpinning of industrycertifications,andtheearningofassociatesdegreesdemonstratethriving communities, and the effectivenesskey ofto Colorado's investmenteconomic inprosperity publicand schools;future;
(e)(b) ResearchWiseandadequateinvestmentinColorado'sschoolsisessential demonstratesto thatmaintaining increasingand schoolimproving fundingthe resultscompetitiveness inof long-termColorado increases in graduation rates and lifetimeits wages,students; prevents crime, and lowers incarceration rates;
(f)(c) EducatorsandsupportstaffineveryschooldistrictandcharterThemoneyinvestedinColorado'spublicschoolshasareturnon schoolinvestment acrossthat Coloradohas makelong invaluablebeen contributionsrecognized toas theiramong schools, districts, and communities by dedicating their time, talents, and out-of-pocket moneytotheirstudents,despiteColoradoranking near the bottomnation's ofhighest; starting teacher payand having the largest teacher paypenalty in the nation;
(g)(d) Teachers,An counselors,increase parain professionals,the busrates drivers,of andK-12 essentialsupportstaffgraduation, areleavingtheirprofessionsbecausesalariesthe notearning keptof upindustry withcertifications, housing,and healthcare,the andearning costof associates degrees demonstrate the effectiveness of living;Colorado's investment in public schools;
(h)(e) StudentsResearch aredemonstrates learningthat inincreasing overcrowdedschool classroomsfunding andresults in -3-long-termincreasesingraduationratesandlifetimewages,preventscrime, 135and schoolslowers withincarceration fewerrates; mental health counselors, opportunities for special educationsupport,andprogramsthatsupporttheirabilitytodevelopinto healthy, productive adults;
(f) Educators and support staff in every school district and charter school across Colorado make invaluable contributions to their schools, districts, and communities by dedicating their time, talents, and out-of-pocket money to their students, despite Colorado ranking near the bottomof starting teacher payand havingthelargestteacher paypenaltyin the nation;
(g) Teachers, counselors, para professionals, bus drivers, and essential support staff are leaving their professions because salaries have not kept up with housing, healthcare, and cost of living;
(h) Studentsarelearninginovercrowdedclassroomsandinschools with fewer mental health counselors, opportunities for special education support, and programs that support their ability to develop into healthy, productive adults;
(j) In January 2025, the legislature received the reports and recommendationofthetwocommissionedadequacystudies:"EquityandPAGE Adequacy2-SENATE ofBILL Colorado26-135 Schoolrecommendation Fundingof - A Cost-Modeling Approach", by the Americantwo institutescommissioned foradequacy research,studies: and "Colorado Input-Based Financial Adequacy Study Report", by Augenblick, Palaich and Associates, Inc;
(k)"Equity Theand adequacyAdequacyof studiesColorado foundSchool that,Funding were- ColoradoA schoolsCost-Modeling fundedfullyandfairly,everystudentwouldhavetheindividualattentionApproach", theyby needthe fromAmerican teachers,institutes counselors,for healthresearch, professionals,and tutors,"Colorado andInput-Based supportFinancial staffAdequacy toStudy succeedReport", by Augenblick, Palaich and thrive;Associates, Inc;
every(k) teacherTheadequacystudiesfoundthat,wereColoradoschoolsfunded wouldfullyandfairly,everystudentwouldhavetheindividualattentiontheyneed havefrom ateachers, reasonablecounselors, workload,health professionalprofessionals, developmenttutors, and coaching,support andstaff a salary that would allow them to livesucceed whereand theythrive; work;
and every communityteacher would enjoyhave thea benefitreasonable ofworkload, vibrantprofessionaldevelopmentandcoaching,andasalarythatwouldallowthem publicto schools,live awhere high-qualitythey workforce,work; and an engaged citizenry;
(l) Colorado's fiscal constraints and potentialevery ofcommunity federalwould fundingenjoy cuts to education, medicaid, nutrition, human services, and other critical programs threaten the sustainabilitybenefit and adequacy of schoolvibrantpublicschools,ahigh-qualityworkforce,andanengagedcitizenry; funding in Colorado and to deplete the state education fund;
(m)(l) ResearchColorado'sfiscalconstraintsandpotentialoffederalfundingcuts demonstratesto thateducation, high-qualitymedicaid, earlynutrition, childhoodhuman education,services, includingand childother carecritical andprograms preschool,threaten producesthe significantsustainability long-termand benefits,adequacy includingof improved school readiness,funding higherin graduationColorado rates, and greaterto lifetimedeplete earnings, and that every dollar -4- 135 investedinhigh-qualitychildhoodeducationyieldssubstantialreturnsto the state andeducation itsfund; communities;
(n)(m) ChildrenResearch whodemonstrates participatethat inhigh-quality high-quality,early preschoolchildhood andeducation, including child care programsand arrivepreschool, inproduces kindergartensignificant betterlong-termbenefits,includingimprovedschoolreadiness,highergraduation preparedrates, toand learngreater acrosslifetime language,math,andsocial-emotionaldomains,withthegreatestbenefitsearnings, accruingand tothat childrenevery fromdollar workinginvested families,in ruralhigh-qualitychildhood communities,education yields substantial returns to the state and multilingualits households;communities;
and(n) (o)Childrenwhoparticipateinhigh-qualitypreschoolandchildcare Therefore,programs itarrive is in thekindergarten bestbetter interestprepared of educators, students, and their families to allowlearn votersacross tolanguage, investmath, furtherand insocial-emotional publicdomains, educationwith by modernizing the state'sgreatest abilitybenefits toaccruing retain and spend revenue to meetchildren thefrom needsworking offamilies, Coloradorural communitiescommunities, and tomultilingual ensurehouseholds; that state investment in K-12 public education is increased by two percent for at least ten years through the funding of a positive factor.
and (o) Therefore, it is in the best interest of educators, students, and their families to allow voters to invest further in public education by modernizingthestate'sabilitytoretainandspendrevenuetomeettheneeds ofColoradocommunitiesandtoensurethatstateinvestmentinK-12public education is increased by two percent for at least ten years through the funding of a positive factor.
Show all 107 changed lines (67 more)
PAGE 3-SENATE BILL 26-135 22-54-103.7.
Positive factor -definitions.- definitions.
(1) ASA S USED IN THIS SECTI,UNLESSSECTIO,UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:
(a) "NEW"N EW FORMULA DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION " MEANSADISTRICT 'STOTALPROGRAMFORTHEAPPLICABLEBUDGETYEAR'STOTALPROGRAMFORTHEAPPLICABLEBUDGETYEARAS AS CALCULATED PURSUANT TO THE DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM FORMULA INSECTION22-54-103.5.THETERMDOESNOTINCLUDEANYADJUSTMENTSIN REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-54-103.3WHEN22-54-103.5. DETERMINING A DISTRICTS TOTAL PROGRAM FOR THE 2027-28 BUDGET YEAR THROUGH THE 2030-31BUDGET YEAR .
-5-HE 135TERM (b)DOES "NEWNOT FORMULA STATEWIDE TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION " MEANS THE DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM FOR ALL DISTRICTS FOR THE APPLICABLE BUDGET YEAR AS CALCULATED PURSUANT TO THE DISTRICT TOTALPROGRAMFORMULAINSECTION 22-54-103.5.THETERMDOESNOT INCLUDE ANY ADJUSTMENTS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-54-103.3WHEN22-54-103.3 WHEN DETERMINING A DISTRIC'SDISTRICTS TOTALTOTALPROGRAMFORTHE PROGRAM2027-28BUDGET FOR THE 2027-28 BUDGET YEAR THROUGH THE 2030-31BUDGET2030-31 BUDGET YEAR .
(c)(b) "OSITIVE"NEW FACTOR"MEANSFORMULA :STATEWIDE TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION " MEANS THE DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM FOR ALL DISTRICTS FOR THE APPLICABLE BUDGET YEAR AS CALCULATED PURSUANT TO THE DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM FORMULA IN SECTION 22-54-103.5.
(I)HE FRTERM THEDOES 2026-27BUDGETNOT YEARINCLUDEANYADJUSTMENTSREQUIREDPURSUANTTOSECTION ,TWO22-54-103.3 PERCENTWHEN OFDETERMINING PROGRAMA FOUNDATIONDISTRICT CALCULATED'S TOTAL PROGRAM FOR THE 2025-262027-28 BUDGET YEAR;YEAR THROUGH THE 2030-31 BUDGET YEAR .
(II)(c) FOR"POSITIVE THEFACTO" 2027-28MEANS BUDGET: YEAR THROUGH THE 2034-35 BUDGET YEAR ,THE SUM OF:
(A)(I) TWO PERCENT OF PROGRAM FOUNDATION FOR THE IMMEDIATELY2026-27 PRECEDING BUDGET YEAR ;AND,TWO (B)PERCENT TOF HEPROGRAM POSITIVEFOUNDATION FACTORCALCULATED FOR THE IMMEDIATELY2025-26 PRECEDING BUDGET YEAR ;AND; (III) FR THE 2035-36BUDGET YEAR AND EACH BUDGET YEAR THEREAFTER :
(A)(II) TWOFRTHE PERCENT2027-28 OFBUDGETYEARTHROUGHTHE PROGRAM FOUNDATION FOR THE 2034-35 BUDGET YEAR ;AND,THE (B)SUM THEOF: POSITIVE FACTOR FOR TH2034-35BUDGET YEAR .
(d)(A) "PROGRAMTWOPERCENTOFPROGRAMFOUNDATIONFORTHEIMMEDIATELY FOUNDATIONPRECEDING "MEANSBUDGET YEAR ;AND (B) THE POSITIVE FACTOR FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING BUDGET YEAR ;AND (III) FOR THE 2035-36 BUDGET YEAR AND EACH BUDGET YEAR THEREAFTER :
(I)(A) FRT BUDGETWO YEARSPERCENT BEFOREOF TOTAL PROGRAM ISFOUNDATION DETERMINEDFOR PURSUANTTOSECTIONTHE 22-54-103.5ANAMOUNTEQUALTOSTATESHARE2034-35 OFPAGE TOTAL4-SENATE PROGRAMBILL ;AND26-135 (II) FR BUDGET YEARSYEAR WHEN;AND TOTAL(B) PROGRAMT ISHE DETERMINEDPOSITIVE -6-FACTOR 135FOR PURSUANTTOSECTIONTHE2034-35BUDGET 22-54-103.5ANAMOUNTEQUALTONEWFORMULAYEAR STATEWIDE TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION .
(e)(d) "TATESHAREOFTOTALPROGRAM"PROGRAM "MEANSANAMOUNTEQUALFOUNDATION TO" THEMEANS TOTAL: OF THE STATS SHARE OF EACH SCHOOL DISTRIS TOTAL PROGRAM ,AS DEFINED IN SECTIO22-55-102 (18).
(f)(I) "WOPERCENTFOR K-12PUBLICEDUCATIONINCREASEBUDGET "MEANSANYEARS BEFORE TOTAL PROGRAM IS DETERMINED PURSUANTTOSECTION 22-54-103.5ANAMOUNTEQUALTOSTATESHAREOF TOTAL PROGRAM ;AND (II) FOR BUDGET YEARS WHEN TOTAL PROGRAM IS DETERMINED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-54-103.5,AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THENEW LESSERFORMULA O:STATEWIDE TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION .
(I)(e) THE"STATE POSITIVESHARE FACTORFORTHEOF CURRENTTOTAL BUDGETPROGRAM YEAR;OR"MEANS (II)AN TEAMOUNTTHATTHESTATEISAUTHORIZEDTORETAINAND SPEND PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-77-302 (1)FOR THE BUDGET YEAR MINUS ,FOR THE 2027-28 BUDGET YEAR AND EACH BUDGET YEAR THEREAFTER ,AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNTS OF WARRANTSTHE ISSUEDSTATE'S BYSHARE THEOF STATEEACH TREASURERSCHOOL PURSUANTDISTRICT'S TOTOTAL SECTIONPROGRAM 39-3-207(4)IN,AS THEDEFINED CURRENTIN BUDGETSECTIO22-55-102 YEAR.(18).
(2)(f) FOR"TWO THEPERCENT 2026-27K-12 BUDGETPUBLIC YEAREDUCATION ANDINCREASE EACH" BUDGETMEANS YEARAN THEREAFTERAMOUNT ,AEQUAL DISTRICSTO SHARETHE LESSER OF POSITIVE: FACTOR IS EQUAL TO:
(NEWFORMULADISTRICT(I) TOTALPROGRAMCALCULATIONTHE /POSITIVE NFACTOR EWFOR FORMULASTATEWIDETOTALPROGRAMCALCULATIONTHE )CURRENT XBUDGET (TWOPERCENTYEAR K-12;OR PUBLIC(II) EDUCATIONTHE INCREASE).AMOUNT THAT THE STATE IS AUTHORIZED TO RETAIN AND SPEND PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-77-302(1) FOR THE BUDGET YEAR MINUS, FOR THE 2027-28BUDGET YEAR AND EACH BUDGET YEAR THEREAFTER ,AN AMOUNTEQUALTOTHE TOTALDOLLARAMOUNTSOFWARRANTSISSUEDBY THESTATETREASURERPURSUANTTOSECTION 39-3-207(4)INTHECURRENT BUDGET YEAR .
(3)(2) FORF OR THE 2026-27 BUDGET YEAR AND EACH BUDGET YEAR THEREAFTER ,,A THEDISTRICTS DEPARTMENTSHARE OF EDUCATIONPOSITIVE SHALLFACTOR ANNUALLYIS CALCULATEEQUAL EACHT: DISTRICT'S NEW FORMULA DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION AND THE NEW FORMULA STATEWIDE TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION .
(4)(NEW FORFORMULA THE 2026-27 BUDGET YEAR AND EACH BUDGET YEAR THEREAFTER ,THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND THE STAFF OF THE -7- 135 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL SHALL ANNUALLY DETERMINE EACH DISTRICT 'STOTAL POSITIVEPROGRAM FACTORCALCULATION BASED/ ONN BUDGETEW PROJECTIONSFORMULA ;EXCEPTSTATEWIDE THATTOTAL THEPROGRAM DEPARTMENTOFEDUCATIONANDTHESTAFFOFTHELEGISLATIVECOUNCILCALCULATION SHALL) MAKEX MID(TWO YEARPERCENT REVISIONSK-12 TOPUBLIC REPLACEEDUCATION PROJECTIONSINCREASE WITH). ACTUAL FIGURES TO DETERMINE ANY NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE AMOUNT TO MAINTAIN THE POSITIVE FACTOR FOR THE APPLICABLE BUDGET YEAR .
(5)(3) AF DISTRICTSOR POSITIVETHE FACTOR2026-27 ISBUDGET INYEAR ADDITIONAND ,BUTEACH ISBUDGET NOTYEAR INCLUDEDTHEREAFTER IN , THE DISTRICTSDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SHALL ANNUALLY CALCULATE EACH DISTRICT S NEW FORMULA DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM DETERMINEDPAGE PURSUANT5-SENATE TOBILL THIS26-135 ARTICLECALCULATION 54.AND THE NEW FORMULA STATEWIDE TOTAL PROGRAM CALCULATION .
(4) F OR THE POSITIVE2026-27 FACTORBUDGET MUSTYEAR BEAND DISTRIBUTEDEACH INBUDGET THEYEAR SAMETHEREAFTER FORM,THE ANDDEPARTMENT MANNEROF INEDUCATION WHICHAND PAYMENTSTHE STAFF OF TOTALPROGRAMTHE ARELEGISLATIVE DISTRIBUTEDCOUNCIL UNDERSHALL LAWTOANNUALLY ALLPUBLICDETERMINE SCHOOLSEACH .DISTRICT 'S POSITIVE FACTOR BASED ON BUDGET PROJECTIONS ;
(6)EXCEPT ATHAT DISTRICTTHE SHALLDEPARTMENT ONLYOF EXPENDEDUCATION ITSAND THE STAFF OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL SHALLMAKE MID -YEARREVISIONS TO REPLACE PROJECTIONSWITHACTUAL FIGURES TO DETERMINE ANY NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE AMOUNT TO MAINTAIN THE POSITIVE FACTOR T:FOR THE APPLICABLE BUDGET YEAR .
(5) A DISTRICTS POSITIVE FACTOR IS IN ADDITION T, BUT IS NOT INCLUDED IN, THE DISTRICTS TOTAL PROGRAM DETERMINED PURSUANT TO THISARTICLE 54.T HEPOSITIVEFACTORMUSTBE DISTRIBUTEDINTHESAME FORM AND MANNER IN WHICH PAYMENTS OF TOTAL PROGRAM ARE DISTRIBUTED UNDER LAW TO ALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS .
(6) A DISTRICT SHALL ONLY EXPEND ITS POSITIVE FACTOR TO :
(c) LOWER CLASS SIZES;ANDSIZES ;AND (d) INCREASE ACCESS TO CAREER AND TECHNICAL COURSES .
SECTIONSECTION3. 3.
InInColoradoRevisedStatutes,addpart3toarticle77 Colorado Revised Statutes, add part 3 to article 77 of title 24 as follows:
A SSUSEDINTHISPART USED3,UNLESSTHECONTEXTOTHERWISEREQUIRES IN THIS PART 3, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE -8- 135 REQUIRES :
3 (1) "C"CHILDREN HILDREN'S'SACCOUNT ACCOUNT"OR " OR "ACCOUNT " MEANS THE CHILDREN 'S ACCOUNT CREATED IN SECTION24-77-302SECTION 24-77-302 (2).
6PAGE 6-SENATE BILL 26-135 (2) "S TATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING "MEANS" MEANS THE AMOUNT DETERMINED BY LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL STAFF PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-77-303 (1).
(4) "TWO"T WO PERCENT K-12 PUBLIC EDUCATION INCREASE"INCREASE " HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION 22-54-103.7 (1)(f).
(1) FOR STATE FISCAL YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2026,2026,THESTATEMAYRETAINANDSPENDSTATEREVENUESTHATTHESTATE THE STATE MAY RETAIN AND SPEND STATE REVENUES THAT THE STATE OTHERWISE WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO REFUND UNDER SECTION 20 (7)(d)OF(7)(d)OFARTICLE ARTICLE X OFOFTHE THE STATE CONSTITUTIONCONSTITUTIONINANAMOUNT INEQUALTO AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING FOR THE STATE FISCAL YEAR.YEAR .
(2) (a) THERE IS HEREBY CREATED IN THE GENERAL FUND THE CHILDREN 'SS ACCOUNT,WHICHACCOUNT ,WHICH CONSISTS OF:OF :
(I) FFORSTATE ORFISCALYEAR STATE2026-27,ANAMOUNT FISCALOFMONEYEQUAL YEARTOTHEAMOUNTTHATTHESTATERETAINSFORSTATEFISCALYEAR 2026-27, AN AMOUNT OF MONEY EQUALTOTHEAMOUNTTHATTHESTATERETAINSFORSTATEFISCALYEAR 2026-27 PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (1)OF THIS SECTIO;ANDSECTION;AND (II) FOR STATE FISCALYEARSFISCAL YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2027, AN AMOUNT OF MONEY EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT THAT THE STATE -9-RETAINSFORTHESTATEFISCALYEARPURSUANTTOSUBSECTION 135(1)OFTHIS RETAINS FOR THE STATE FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO SUBSECTIO(1)OF THIS SECTION MINUS AN AMOUNT EQUALTOEQUAL TO THE TOTALDOLLARTOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT OF WARRANTS ISSUED BY THE STATE TREASURER PURSUANT TO SECTION 39-3-207(4)IN39-3-207 (4)IN THE SAME STATE FISCAL YE.RYEAR. (b) FOR EACH STATE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING ON OR AFTJULY 1, 2026BUT BEFORE JULY 1, 2036THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY :
(I)(b) SHALL TRANSFER OR APPROPRIATE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE TWO PERCENT K-12 PUBLIC EDUCATION INCREASE FOR THEEACH STATE FISCAL YEAR ANDBEGINNING THEON DEPARTMENTOR OFAFTER EDUCATIONJULY SHALL1, DISTRIBUTE2026,BUT THATBEFORE AMOUNTJULY IN1, ACCORDANCE2036THE WITHGENERAL SECTIONASSEMBLY 22-54-103.7;:
(II)(I) SHALLS APPROPRIATEHALL OR TRANSFER ANOR AMOUNTAPPROPRIATE FOR INVESTMENT IN K-12 PUBLIC EDUCATION, TO BETHE USEDDEPARTMENT FOR SCHOOL SERVICES,DISABILITY SERVICES TO STUDENTS WITH DISABILIT,EAND INCREASINGANNUALCONTACTHOURS ,EQUALTOTHEAMOUNT ,IFANY,BY WHICH ONE HALF OF THEEDUCATION AMOUNTAN CREDITED TO THE ACCOUNT FOR THE STATE FISCAL YEAR EXCEEDS THE AMOUNT APPROPRIATEDEQUAL OR TRANSFERRED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(b)(IOF THIS SECTION FOR THE STATETWO FISCALPERCENT YEA;ANDK-12 (III)PUBLIC AEDUCATION FTERINCREASE MAKING THE APPROPRIATIONS OR TRANSFERS REQUIRED BY SUBSECTIONS(2)(b)(IAND (2)(b)(IOF THIS SECTION FOR THE STATE FISCAL YEAR ,SHALLAND APPROPRIATE OR TRANSFER THE REMAININGDEPARTMENT MONEYOF INEDUCATION THESHALL ACCOUNTDISTRIBUTE TO PROGRAMS THAT SUPPORTAMOUNT CIN OLORADOACCORDANCE SCHILDRENWITH PRIORITIZINGCHILDCARE,FULLDAYPRESCHOOLPAGE ,7-SENATE ANDBILL OTHER26-135 PROGRAMSSECTION THAT22-54-103.7; PREPARE CHILDREN TO BE SUCCESSFUL IN SCHOOL .
-10-(II) 135SALLAPPROPRIATEORTRANSFERANAMOUNTFORINVESTMENT 2INK-12 (3)PUBLICEDUCATION THE,TOBE APPROVALUSEDFORSCHOOLSERVICES OF,DISABILITY THESERVICES BALLOTTO MEASURESTUDENTS INCLUDINGWITH THISDISABILITIES SECTION,AND BYINCREASING AANNUAL MAJORITYCONTACT OFHOURS ,EQUAL TO THE ELECTORSAMOUNT VOTING,IF ONANY,BY WHICH ONE HALF OF THE BALLOTAMOUNT MEASURECONSTITUTESAVOTERCREDITED -APPROVEDREVENUECHANGETOALLOWTO THERETENTIONANDEXPENDITURETHE OFTHEADDITIONALSTATEREVENUESACCOUNT THATFOR THE STATE ISFISCAL AUTHORIZEDYEAR TOEXCEEDS RETAINTHE ANDAMOUNT SPENDAPPROPRIATED OR TRANSFERRED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (1)OF(2)(b)(IOF THIS SECTI.NSECTION (4)THISSECTIONDOESNOTAFFECTTHEAMOUNTTHATTHESTATEFOR ISPERMITTEDTORETAINANDSPENDUNDERTHEEXCESSSTATEREVENUESTHE CAP,ASSTATE DEFINEDFISCAL YEAR;AND (III) FTERMAKINGTHEAPPROPRIATIONSORTRANSFERSREQUIRED BY SUBSECTIONS (2)(b)(I)AND (2)(b)(IIOF THIS SECTION FOR THE STATE FISCALYEAR ,SHALLAPPROPRIATE ORTRANSFERTHE REMAININGMONEYIN THE ACCOUNT TO PROGRAMS THAT SUPPORT C OLORADO S CHILDREN , PRIORITIZING CHILD CARE,FULL-DAY PRESCHOOL ,AND OTHER PROGRAMS THAT PREPARE CHILDREN TO BE SUCCESSFUL IN SECTIO24-77-103.6SCHOOL (6)(b)(I)..
(5)(3) THET MONEYHE THATAPPROVAL OF THE GENERALASSEMBLYBALLOT APPROPRIATESMEASURE ORINCLUDING TRANSFERSTHIS PURSUANTSECTIONBYAMAJORITYOFTHEELECTORSVOTINGONTHEBALLOTMEASURE TOCONSTITUTES SUBSECTION(2)(b)(OFA THISVOTER SECTIONAPPROVED SHALLREVENUE SUPPLEMENTCHANGE TO ALLOW THE RETENTION AND NOTEXPENDITURE SUPPLANTOF TOTALPROGRAMTHE ASADDITIONAL DEFINEDSTATE INREVENUES SECTIONTHAT 22-55-102THESTATEISAUTHORIZEDTORETAINANDSPENDPURSUANTTOSUBSECTION (18).(1)OF THIS SECTION.
(4) THIS SECTION DOES NOT AFFECT THE AMOUNT THAT THE STATE IS PERMITTED TO RETAIN AND SPEND UNDER THE EXCESS STATE REVENUES CAP,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-77-103.6 (6)(b)(I).
(5) THE MONEY THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY APPROPRIATES OR TRANSFERS PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION (2)(b)(IOF THIS SECTION SHALL SUPPLEMENT AND NOT SUPPLANT TOTALPROGRAM ,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 22-55-102 (18).
(1) ONORBEFOREO JANUARYN 15,2027,ONORAFTEROR BEFORE ANUARY 15, 2027,ON OR AFTER JULY 1,2027,1, BUTBEFORE2027, BUT BEFORE A UGUST 1,2027,ANDONORAFTEREACH1,2027, AND ON OR AFTER EACH JULY 1ANDBEFORE1AND BEFORE EACH AUGUSTA UGUST 1 THEREAFTER ,LEGISLATIVE, LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL STAFF SHALL DETERMINE AND REPORT TO THE STATE CONTROLLER ,,THE THE OFFICE OFOFSTATE STATE PLANNING AND BUDGETING ,AND, AND THE JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE,COMMITTEE THEGREATESTTOTALAMOUNT, INAPRECEDINGSTATEFISCALYEARTHATTHE HASBEENCOUNTEDASSTATEFISCALYEARSPENDINGANDAPPROPRIATEDPAGE BY8-SENATE THEBILL GENERAL26-135 ASSEMBLYGREATEST FORTOTAL AMOUNT IN A PRECEDING STATE FISCAL YEAR FORTHAT CATEGORICALPROGRAMSANDTHESTATESHAREOFTOTALPROGRAMANDHAS THEBEENCOUNTEDASSTATEFISCALYEARSPENDINGANDAPPROPRIATEDBYTHE AMOUNTGENERAL OFASSEMBLY THEFOR TWOA PERCENTPRECEDING K-12STATE PUBLICFISCAL EDUCATIONYEAR INCREASEFOR FORTHESAMEPRECEDINGSTATEFISCALYEARCATEGORICAL .TPROGRAMS HEAMOUNTDETERMINED AND REPORTEDTHE BYSTATE LEGISLATIVESHARE COUNCILOF STAFFTOTAL PURSUANTPROGRAM TOAND THISTHE -11-AMOUNT 135OFTHE SUBSECTIONTWOPERCENT (1)K-12 ISPUBLICEDUCATIONINCREASE FOR THE SAME PRECEDING STATE PUBLICFISCAL EDUCATIONYEAR FUNDING.THE FORAMOUNT THATDETERMINED STATEAND FISCALREPORTEDBYLEGISLATIVE YEAR.COUNCILSTAFFPURSUANT TOTHISSUBSECTION (1)ISTHESTATEPUBLICEDUCATIONFUNDINGFORTHATSTATEFISCALYEAR .
(2) A S USED IN THIS SECTI,UNLESSSECTION,UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES :
(a) "C ATEGORICAL PROGRAMS ""HAS HAS THE MEANING SET FORTH IN SECTION22-55-102SECTION 22-55-102 (4).
(b) "S"STATE TATE SHARE OFOFTOTAL TOTAL PROGRAM "MEANS AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE TOTALOFTHETOTAL OF THE STATE S SHARE OF EACH SCHOOL DISTRICSDISTRICT 'S TOTAL PROGRAM ,AS DEFINED IN SECTIO22-55-102SECTION22-55-102 (18).
ExcessExcessstaterevenuesexpenditureindependentaudit. state revenues expenditure independent audit.
(1) FORF OR EACH STATE FISCAL YEAR THAT THE STATE RETAINS AND SPENDS STATE REVENUES IN EXCESS OF THE LIMITATION ON STATE FISCAL YEAR SPENDING PURSUANT TO THIS PART 3,THE STATE AUDITOR SHALLREPORTSHALL REPORT ON EXCESS STATE REVENUES , INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION :
(a) THE AMOUNT OFSTATEOF REVENUESTHATSTATE REVENUES THAT THE STATE RETAINED ANDANDSPENT SPENT IN EXCESS OFOFTHE THE LIMITATION ON STATE FISCALFISCALYEARSPENDING YEAR SPENDING PURSUANT TO THIS PART 3;AND (b) A DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE STATE EXPENDED FROM THE ACCOUNTTHESTATEREVENUESTHATTHESTATERETAINEDANDSPENTINACCOUNT EXCESSTHE OFSTATE THEREVENUES LIMITATIONTHAT ONTHE STATE FISCALRETAINED YEARAND SPENDINGSPENT PURSUANTIN TOEXCESSOFTHE LIMITATIONONSTATEFISCALYEARSPENDINGPURSUANTTO THIS PART3.
(2) TTHESTATEAUDITORSHALLCOMPLETETHEREPORTINGREQUIRED HE STATE AUDITOR SHALL COMPLETE THE REPORTING REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION (1)(1)OF OF THIS SECTION AT THE SAME TIME THAT THE STATE AUDITORAUDITORCOMPLETESTHEREPORTREQUIREDPURSUANTTOSECTION COMPLETES THE REPORT REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-3-103 (2)FOLLOWING A FISCAL YEAR IN WHICH THE STATE -12- 135 RETAINS AND SPENDS PAGE 9-SENATE BILL 26-135 STATE REVENUES IN EXCESS OFTHEOF THE LIMITATION ON STATEFISCALYEARSPENDINGPURSUANTTOTHISPARTSTATE 3ANDMAYAMENDFISCAL YEAR SPENDING PURSUANT TO THIS PART 3 AND MAY AMEND THE REPORT THEREAFTER AS NECESSARY .
5 SECTION 4.
(1) (g) (I) ADITIONALLY ,COMMENCING,COMMENCINGON ON AUGUST 1,1,2027, 2027, EACH LOCAL EDUCATION PROVIDER ,,AS AS DEFINED IN SECTIO22-54-202,SECTION 22-54-202, SHALL POST IN A FORMAT THAT CAN BE DOWNLOADED AND SORTED ,FOR FREE PUBLIC ACCESS , THEFOR LOCALFREE EDUCATIONPUBLICACCESS PROVIDER,THELOCALEDUCATIONPROVIDER S'SACTUALEXPENDITURES ACTUALOF EXPENDITURESOFANYPOSITIVEANY POSITIVE FACTOR RECEIVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22-54-103.7.
(II) ASA S USED IN THIS SUBSECTIO(1)(g),UNLESSSUBSECTION (1)(g),UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES ,"POSITIVE FACTO"FACTOR HAS"HAS THE MEANINGMEANINGSET SETFORTHIN FORTHSECTION IN22-54-103.7 SECTION22-54-103.7 (1)(c).
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,24-77-106.5,amendIn Colorado Revised Statutes, 24-77-106.5, amend (1)(b) as follows:
(1)(1)(b) (b)Notwithstandingsection24-1-136(11)(a)(I),baseduponthe Notwithstandingfinancialreportpreparedinaccordancewithsubsection(1)(a)ofthissection section 24-1-136 (11)(a)(I), based upon the financial report prepared in accordance with subsection (1)(a) of this section for any given fiscal year, the controller shall certify to the governor, the general assembly, and the executive director of the department of revenue no later than September 1 following the end of a fiscal year the amount of state revenues in excess of the limitation on -13- 135 state fiscal year spending imposedimposedbysection20(7)(a)ofarticleXofthestateconstitution,ifany,for bysection 20 (7)(a) of article X of the state constitution, if any, for such fiscal year and the state revenues in excess of such limitation that the state is authorized to retain and spend pursuant to voter approvalapprovalof of section 24-77-103.6ART24-77-103.6 3AND OFPART 3OF THIS ARTICLE 77.
SECTIONSECTION6. 6.
InInColoradoRevisedStatutes,29-32-104,amend(5) Colorado Revised Statutes, 29-32-104, amend (5) as follows:
PAGE 10-SENATE BILL 26-135 29-32-104.
(5) IfIftheLegislativeCouncilStaff'sMarchEconomicandRevenue theForecastinanygivenyearprojectsrevenueforthenextstatefiscalyearwill Legislative Council Staff's March Economic and Revenue Forecast in any given year projects revenue for the next state fiscal year will fall below the revenue limit imposed under section 20 of article X of the state constitutionconstitutionY AN AMOUNT GREATER THAN THE AMOUNT OF STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING AS DEFINED IN SECTION 24-77-301 (2), the generalgeneralassemblymayreducethefundingallocatedtotheofficerequiredby assemblymayreducethis the funding allocated to the office required bythis section for the next state fiscal year in order to balance thethestate state budget for said state fiscal year.
InColoradoRevisedStatutes,39-22-123.5,amendIn Colorado Revised Statutes, 39-22-123.5, amend (3.5)(a)(VIII) as follows:
Earnedincometaxcredit-legislativedeclarationEarned income tax credit - legislative declaration - repeal.
(VIII) "Nonexemptrevenue"means,fortheapplicablestatefiscal"Nonexempt year,therevenuesthatareidentifiedasnonexemptrevenuesintheannualrevenue" means, for the applicable state fiscal year, the revenues that are identified as nonexempt revenues in the annual comprehensive financial report published by the office of the state controller;XCEPTcontroller;EXCEPT THAT,FORTHAT ,FOR STATE FISCAL YEARS COMMENCING ON OR -14- 135 AFTER JULY 1, 2026,NONEXEMPT2026, NONEXEMPT REVENUE INCLUDES STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING AS DEFINED IN SECTIO24-77-301SECTION 24-77-301 (2).
Family affordability tax credit - tax preference performancestatement-legislativedeclaration-definitions-repeal.performance statement - legislative declaration - definitions - repeal.
(G) "Nonexempt"Nonexemptrevenue"means,fortheapplicablestatefiscalyear, revenue"therevenuethatisidentifiedas means,nonexempt forTABOR therevenuesintheannual applicablePAGE state11-SENATE fiscalBILL year,therevenuethatisidentifiedasnonexemptTABORrevenuesinthe26-135 annualcomprehensivefinancialreportpublishedbytheofficeofthestatecomprehensive controller;CEPTfinancial report published by the office of the state controller;EXCEPT THAT ,FOR STATE FISCAL YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2026,NONEXEMPT2026, NONEXEMPT REVENUE INCLUDES STATE PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDING AS DEFINED IN SECTIO24-77-301SECTION 24-77-301 (2).
At the electionheldonNovember3,2026,thesecretaryofstateshallsubmitthiselection actheld byon itsNovember 3, 2026, the secretaryof state shall submit this act byits ballot title to the registered electors of the state for their approval or rejection.
Each elector voting at the election may cast a vote either"Yes/For"or"No/Against"onthefollowingballottitle:"Shallstateeither investment"Yes/For" inor K-12"No/Against" public education increase two percent each year for thenexttenyears,withinvestmentsusedtoincreaseteacherpay,improve teacher retention, lower class sizes, and increase access to career and technical courses, without raising taxes but instead funded byraising the annual limit on state fiscal year spending only by the amountfollowing spent publicK-12educationasavoter-approvedrevenuechange,andrequiring an annual publicly released, independent audit to show how the new investments are spent?" Except as otherwise provided in section -15- 135 1-40-123, Colorado Revised Statutes, if a majorityof the electors voting on the ballot titletitle: vote "Yes/For", then the act will become part of the Colorado Revised Statutes.
-16-"Shall 135state investmentin K-12 public education increase two percenteachyearforthe next ten years, with investments used to increase teacher pay, improve teacher retention, lower class sizes, and increase access to career and technical courses, without raising taxes but instead funded by raising the annual limit on state fiscal year spending only by the amount spent on public K-12 education as a voter-approved revenue change, and requiring an annual publicly released, independent audit to show how the new investments are spent?" Except as otherwise provided in section 1-40-123, Colorado Revised Statutes, if a majorityof the electorsvoting on the ballot title vote "Yes/For", then the act will become part of the Colorado Revised Statutes.
____________________________ ____________________________ James Rashad Coleman, Sr.
Julie McCluskie PRESIDENT OF SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________________________ ____________________________ Esther van Mourik Vanessa Reilly SECRETARY OF CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE THE SENATE OF REPRESENTATIVES PAGE 12-SENATE BILL 26-135
Show all 107 changed rows (67 more)
Action History
-
Signed by the President of the Senate
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House
-
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
-
House Third Reading Passed with Amendments - Floor
-
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Appropriations
-
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
-
Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
-
Senate Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments
-
Senate Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to Senate Committee of the Whole
-
Senate Committee on Finance Refer Amended to Appropriations
-
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Finance
Sponsors
- Adrienne Benavidez · Primary
- T. Story · Cosponsor
- K. Stewart · Cosponsor
- M. Rutinel · Cosponsor
- N. Ricks · Cosponsor
- J. McCluskie · Cosponsor
- T. Mauro · Cosponsor
- J. Jackson · Cosponsor
- L. Gilchrist · Cosponsor
- M. Froelich · Cosponsor
- C. Espenoza · Cosponsor
- R. English · Cosponsor
- C. Clifford · Cosponsor
- J. Willford · Primary
- E. Velasco · Primary
- B. Titone · Primary
- R. Stewart · Primary
- L. Smith · Primary
- G. Rydin · Primary
- J. Phillips · Primary
- A. Paschal · Primary
- K. Nguyen · Primary
- K. McCormick · Primary
- M. Martinez · Primary
- M. Lindsay · Primary
- S. Lieder · Primary
- J. Joseph · Primary
- E. Hamrick · Primary
- L. Goldstein · Primary
- M. Duran · Primary
- M. Carter · Primary
- S. Camacho · Primary
- A. Boesenecker · Primary
- M. Lukens · Primary
- J. Bacon · Primary
- Lisa Cutter · Primary
- Jessie Danielson · Primary
- Tony Exum · Primary
- Julie Gonzales · Primary
- Nick Hinrichsen · Primary
- Iman Jodeh · Primary
- Chris Kolker · Primary
- Janice Marchman · Primary
- Robert Rodriguez · Primary
- Marc Snyder · Primary
- Tom Sullivan · Primary
- Mike Weissman · Primary
- Katie Wallace · Cosponsor
- Jeff Bridges · Primary
- Cathy Kipp · Primary
- Judy Amabile · Primary
- Lindsey Daugherty · Primary
- William Lindstedt · Primary
- James Coleman · Primary
- Kyle Mullica · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →42 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 46 not signed on · 15 voted No
Sponsors (42)
- Adrienne Benavidez Voted No
- J. Willford
- E. Velasco
- B. Titone
- R. Stewart
- L. Smith
- G. Rydin
- J. Phillips
- A. Paschal
- K. Nguyen
- K. McCormick
- M. Martinez
- M. Lindsay
- S. Lieder
- J. Joseph
- E. Hamrick
- L. Goldstein
- M. Duran
- M. Carter
- S. Camacho
- A. Boesenecker
- M. Lukens
- J. Bacon
- Lisa Cutter Democrat Voted No
- Jessie Danielson Democrat
- Tony Exum Democrat
- Julie Gonzales Democrat
- Nick Hinrichsen Democrat Voted No
- Iman Jodeh Democrat Voted No
- Chris Kolker Democrat
- Janice Marchman Democrat Voted No
- Robert Rodriguez Democrat Voted No
- Marc Snyder Democrat Voted No
- Tom Sullivan Democrat Voted No
- Mike Weissman Democrat Voted No
- Jeff Bridges Democrat Voted No
- Cathy Kipp Democrat Voted No
- Judy Amabile Democrat Voted No
- Lindsey Daugherty Democrat Voted No
- William Lindstedt Democrat Voted No
- James Coleman Democrat Voted No
- Kyle Mullica Democrat Voted No
Co-sponsors (13)
- T. Story
- K. Stewart
- M. Rutinel
- N. Ricks
- J. McCluskie
- T. Mauro
- J. Jackson
- L. Gilchrist
- M. Froelich
- C. Espenoza
- R. English
- C. Clifford
- Katie Wallace Democrat Voted No
Not signed on (46)
46 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 46 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 18% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Boesenecker | Democrat | Yea |
| Brianna Titone | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth Velasco | Democrat | Yea |
| Emily Sirota | Democrat | Yea |
| Junie Joseph | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen McCormick | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Brown | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rick Taggart | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bottoms | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Yea |
| Pelton B. | — | Nay |
| Pelton R. | — | Nay |
| President | — | Yea |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Yea |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Yea |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Yea |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Yea |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Yea |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Yea |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Yea |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Nay |
| John Carson | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 18 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 21 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 36% | 58% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gonzales J. | — | Nay |
| Pelton B. | — | Yea |
| Pelton R. | — | Yea |
| President | — | Nay |
| Adrienne Benavidez | — | Nay |
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Nay |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Dylan Roberts | Democrat | Nay |
| Iman Jodeh | Democrat | Nay |
| James Coleman | Democrat | Nay |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Nay |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Nay |
| Jessie Danielson | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Nay |
| Katie Wallace | Democrat | Nay |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Nay |
| Lindsey Daugherty | Democrat | Nay |
| Lisa Cutter | Democrat | Nay |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Nay |
| Matt Ball | Democrat | Nay |
| Mike Weissman | Democrat | Nay |
| Nick Hinrichsen | Democrat | Nay |
| Robert Rodriguez | Democrat | Nay |
| Tom Sullivan | Democrat | Nay |
| Tony Exum | Democrat | Not Voting |
| William Lindstedt | Democrat | Nay |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Yea |
| Janice Rich | Republican | Yea |
| John Carson | Republican | Yea |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Zamora Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Marc Catlin | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Baisley | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Bridges | Democrat | Yea |
| Judy Amabile | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Kirkmeyer | Republican | Nay |
| Byron Pelton | Republican | Nay |
| Larry Liston | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cathy Kipp | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kolker | Democrat | Yea |
| Janice Marchman | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Gonzales | Democrat | Yea |
| Kyle Mullica | Democrat | Yea |
| Marc Snyder | Democrat | Yea |
| Cleave Simpson | Republican | Nay |
| Lisa Frizell | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Bright | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 135 do?
- The act requires the secretary of state to refer a ballot issue at the November 2026 general election to seek voter approval for the state, beginning in the 2026-27 state fiscal year, to retain and spend an amount of state revenue equal to the amount of state public K-12 education funding in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending and to increase state public K-12 education funding by up to 2% per year for 10 years. The act directs legislative council staff to determine the amount of state public K-12 education funding and describes how legislative council staff will make that determination. The act creates a positive factor to increase state public K-12 education funding. The amount of the positive factor compounds annually for 10 years. The positive factor for the 2026-27 budget year is 2% of the program foundation calculated for the 2025-26 budget year. For the 2027-28 through 2034-35 budget years, it is the sum of 2% of the prior year's program foundation plus the prior year's positive factor. For the 2035-36 budget year and beyond, it is the sum of 2% of the 2034-35 program foundation plus the 2034-35 positive factor. A district's share of the positive factor is calculated proportionally based on the district's total program under the new school finance formula relative to the statewide total program. A district may only use its positive factor funding for increasing teacher pay, improving teacher retention, lowering class sizes, and increasing access to career and technical courses. For the 2026-27 state fiscal year, the children's account consists of an amount of money equal to the amount of state revenues that the state retains for a given fiscal year pursuant to voter approval of the act. For state fiscal years commencing on or after July 1, 2027, the account consists of that same amount minus an amount equal to the total dollar amount of warrants issued by the state treasurer to reimburse local governments for property tax exemptions. Money in the account must first be spent to pay districts their positive factor, then any remaining funds are appropriated for disability services and school services and to increase annual contact hours, and finally to programs prioritizing child care and full-day preschool. The act directs the state auditor to conduct and publish a report on excess state revenues for each state fiscal year that the state retains and spends state revenues in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending. That report must include descriptions of:The amount of state revenues that the state retained and spent that would otherwise have been in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending; andHow the state expended the state revenues that the state retained and spent that would otherwise have been in excess of the limitation on state fiscal year spending. Beginning August 1, 2027, the act requires each local education provider to post, online for free public access in a format that can be downloaded and sorted, its actual expenditures of any positive factor received. Lastly, the act updates provisions regarding the expanded earned income tax credit, the family affordability tax credit, and the affordable housing financing fund to ensure that voter approval of the act does not adversely impact those programs.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Who sponsors SB 135?
- SB 135 is sponsored by Adrienne Benavidez, T. Story, K. Stewart, M. Rutinel, N. Ricks, J. McCluskie, T. Mauro, J. Jackson, L. Gilchrist, M. Froelich, C. Espenoza, R. English, C. Clifford, J. Willford, E. Velasco, B. Titone, R. Stewart, L. Smith, G. Rydin, J. Phillips, A. Paschal, K. Nguyen, K. McCormick, M. Martinez, M. Lindsay, S. Lieder, J. Joseph, E. Hamrick, L. Goldstein, M. Duran, M. Carter, S. Camacho, A. Boesenecker, M. Lukens, J. Bacon, Lisa Cutter (Democrat), Jessie Danielson (Democrat), Tony Exum (Democrat), Julie Gonzales (Democrat), Nick Hinrichsen (Democrat), Iman Jodeh (Democrat), Chris Kolker (Democrat), Janice Marchman (Democrat), Robert Rodriguez (Democrat), Marc Snyder (Democrat), Tom Sullivan (Democrat), Mike Weissman (Democrat), Katie Wallace (Democrat), Jeff Bridges (Democrat), Cathy Kipp (Democrat), Judy Amabile (Democrat), Lindsey Daugherty (Democrat), William Lindstedt (Democrat), James Coleman (Democrat), and Kyle Mullica (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 135?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 05, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 135?
- Track SB 135 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 135
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 135
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →