HB 1012 — Consumer Protections to Promote Fair Market Pricing
Last action — House Committee on Judiciary Postpone Indefinitely
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced January 14, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Mixed recorded votes
5 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
In 2025, the general assembly enacted House Bill 25-1090, which requires clear and conspicuous disclosures regarding the maximum total price charged for goods, services, and property. The bill adds a requirement that a person selling goods for delivery must disclose, at the point of sale, a comparison of the total price for the delivered goods and the total price for the goods available for purchase on site at a store.The bill also prohibits a person from charging unreasonably excessive prices to a captive consumer and defines "captive consumer" as a consumer who is at a location at which a seller of ancillary goods or services does not have competitors regarding the ancillary goods or services being sold. A person that charges unreasonably excessive prices to a captive consumer engages in an unfair or deceptive trade practice in violation of the "Colorado Consumer Protection Act".(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf January 14, 2026
Action History
-
House Committee on Judiciary Postpone Indefinitely
-
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
Sponsors
- M. Weissman · Primary
- W. Lindstedt · Primary
- Yara Zokaie · Primary
- Kyle Brown · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 97 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- M. Weissman
- W. Lindstedt
- Yara Zokaie Democrat Voted No
- Kyle Brown Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (97)
97 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 97 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Not Voting |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
How each member voted (1)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Matt Soper | Republican | Not Voting |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Nay |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Nay |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Yea |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 36% | 64% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cecelia Espenoza | Democrat | Nay |
| Chad Clifford | Democrat | Nay |
| Javier Mabrey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Bacon | Democrat | Yea |
| Lorena Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Carter | Democrat | Nay |
| Yara Zokaie | Democrat | Yea |
| Ava Flanell | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Soper | Republican | Nay |
| Rebecca Keltie | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Slaugh | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 1012 do?
- In 2025, the general assembly enacted House Bill 25-1090, which requires clear and conspicuous disclosures regarding the maximum total price charged for goods, services, and property. The bill adds a requirement that a person selling goods for delivery must disclose, at the point of sale, a comparison of the total price for the delivered goods and the total price for the goods available for purchase on site at a store.The bill also prohibits a person from charging unreasonably excessive prices to a captive consumer and defines "captive consumer" as a consumer who is at a location at which a seller of ancillary goods or services does not have competitors regarding the ancillary goods or services being sold. A person that charges unreasonably excessive prices to a captive consumer engages in an unfair or deceptive trade practice in violation of the "Colorado Consumer Protection Act".(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
- Who sponsors HB 1012?
- HB 1012 is sponsored by M. Weissman, W. Lindstedt, Yara Zokaie (Democrat), and Kyle Brown (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1012?
- This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced January 14, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 1012?
- Track HB 1012 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1012
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1012
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →