Municipal utility districts: competitive bid contracts.
This bill raises the amount requiring competitive bidding for municipal utility districts with a large population from $20,000 to $50,000. It also allows a general manager to award contracts under $100,000 without full board approval in certain districts.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 357 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 357.
You're tracking SB 357
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 357 — Municipal utility districts: competitive bid contracts.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 1997-1998 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
Increases spending thresholds for competitive bids in municipal utility districts.
This bill raises the amount requiring competitive bidding for municipal utility districts with a large population from $20,000 to $50,000. It also allows a general manager to award contracts under $100,000 without full board approval in certain districts.
What this means for you
- Small Business: This may provide more opportunities for small businesses to bid on contracts under the new thresholds.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill SB 357 adds a new section that clarifies the responsibilities of local authorities regarding public safety measures. This change helps ensure that communities are better equipped to respond to emergencies. By explicitly outlining these responsibilities, the bill aims to create clearer expectations and improve overall safety for residents.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Chaptered 08/18/97 - Chaptered Current pdf August 18, 1997
- SB357 View text html
Sponsors
- Rainey · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (1)
- Rainey
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 357?
- SB 357 is sponsored by Rainey.
- What is the current status of SB 357?
- This bill died with 1997-1998 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 357?
- Track SB 357 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 357
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 357
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →