SB 1066 — foreign entities; land; legislative approval
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on April 18, 2025.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
169 added · 20 removedPlain-language change summary
In the recent amendment to Senate Bill 1066, the definition of a "foreign entity that is hostile to the United States" has been clarified to include countries identified by U.S. intelligence as posing national security risks. Additionally, the requirement for legislative approval for foreign entities to purchase land has been removed. This change is significant because it may streamline the process for foreign entities to acquire land in the state, potentially raising concerns about national security and local control.
BillSenate Number:Engrossed foreign entities;
S.B.land;
legislative approval State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1066 FinchemAN FloorACT AmendmentAMENDING ReferenceTITLE to:33, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 4, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 33-459;
FEDERALISMAMENDING CommitteeSECTIONS amendment37-231 AmendmentAND drafted37-240, by:ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
LegRELATING CouncilTO FLOORLAND AMENDMENTSALES. EXPLANATION 1.
Prohibits(TEXT landOF inBILL ArizonaBEGINS fromON beingNEXT conveyedPAGE) to- ai foreign- entityS.B. that is hostile to the United States, rather than conditioning the conveyance on the majority approval of the Legislature.
1066 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1.
Title 33, chapter 4, article 4, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 33-459, to read:
33-459.
Conveyance to foreign entity;
prohibition;
identification;
definition A.
BEGINNING ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION, LAND IN THIS STATE MAY NOT BE CONVEYED TO A FOREIGN ENTITY THAT IS HOSTILE TO THE UNITED STATES.
B.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "FOREIGN ENTITY THAT IS HOSTILE TO THE UNITED STATES" MEANS A COUNTRY THAT IS IDENTIFIED BY THE UNITED STATES DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AS A COUNTRY THAT POSES A RISK TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES IN EACH OF THE THREE MOST RECENT ANNUAL THREAT ASSESSMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ISSUED PURSUANT TO SECTION 108B OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY ACT OF 1947 (50 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 3043(b)).
Sec.
RemovesSection the37-231, identificationArizona submissionRevised requirementsStatutes, tois theamended Arizonato Departmentread: of Real Estate.
37-231.
State lands subject to sale;
rights reserved in lands sold;
state lands not subject to sale;
development agreements A.
All state lands, except as otherwise provided for in this title, including all improvements made or placed on or connected with state lands, shall be subject to appraisal and sale as provided in this title.
B.
Any person over eighteen years of age is entitled to purchase any of the state lands EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 37-240.
C.
All sales, grants, deeds or patents to any state lands sold between July 9, 1954 and March 18, 1968 shall be subject to and shall contain a reservation to the THIS state of an undivided one-sixteenth of all oil, gases and other hydrocarbon substances, coal or stone, metals, minerals, fossils and fertilizer of every name and description, together with all uranium, all thorium, or any other material which THAT is or may be determined by the laws of the THIS state or the United States or decisions of courts to be peculiarly essential to the production of fissionable materials, whether or not of commercial value, subject to the following:
1.
For the purpose of promoting the sale of state lands and the more active cooperation of the owner of the soil, and to facilitate the development of its mineral resources, the state constitutes the purchaser of the land its agent for the purposes specified in this section, and in consideration hereof, relinquishes to and vests in the purchaser of the state land an undivided fifteen-sixteenths of all oil, gas and the value thereof which may be upon ON or within any state land purchased after July 9, 1954 and before March 18, 1968.
- 1 - S.B.
1066 2.
The purchaser of the soil may sell or lease to any person, firm or corporation the oil and gas and other minerals which THAT may be on or in the land, upon ON terms and conditions the purchaser and the owner deem best, subject to the provisions and reservations of this section, but the lessee or purchaser shall pay to the THIS state an undivided one-sixteenth of the mineral produced or the value of the mineral produced at the well or mine as determined by the state land department.
DefinesUpon aON foreigndiscovery entityof thatoil isand hostilegas toin thepaying Unitedquantities Stateson asland aadjoining countrystate thatlands ispurchased identifiedunder by the Unitedauthority States Director of Nationalthis Intelligencesection, asthe apurchaser countryor thatthe posespurchaser's alessee riskshall todrill theand nationalproduce securityall ofwells thenecessary Unitedto Statesprotect in each of the threeland mostso recentpurchased annualfrom threatdrainage assessmentsby ofwells theon Unitedlands Statesin Intelligencewhich Communitythe issuesTHIS pursuantstate tohas sectionno 108Broyalty ofinterest, theor Nationalhas Securitya Actlesser ofroyalty 1947.interest.
If the purchaser or the purchaser's lessee fails to protect against such drainage, the THIS state, acting through the state land department, may, three months after demand therefor in writing by the state land department to such purchaser and the purchaser's lessee, MAY enter upon ON such lands and drill all wells necessary to protect the THIS state against such drainage.
MakesThe conforminginterest changes.reserved by the THIS state in any state lands sold may be committed to a drilling unit or cooperative or unit plans of development and operation of oil and gas pools with the United States, its agencies and its and their lessees and permittees, and with private owners and persons holding oil and gas leases on private lands or on state lands.
AmendmentThe explanationstate preparedland bydepartment Annamay, Nguyeninsofar 02/19/2025as ≤≤the ≥≥interest ≤≤of ≥≥the THIS state may be affected thereby, MAY join in and consent to any such plan on behalf of the THIS state.
Such agreements shall provide for the equitable division on an agreed basis of the oil and gas produced from the unit, but no such agreement shall NOT relieve any operator from the obligation to develop reasonably the lands and leases as a whole committed thereto.
The royalties to which the THIS state is entitled on production from land purchased under this section shall be computed only on that part of the production allocated to such tract.
Show all 69 changed lines (29 more)
When the agreements made under this section provide for the return of gas to a formation underlying the unit, they may provide that no royalties are required to be paid on the gas so returned.
D.
State lands known to contain oil, gases and other hydrocarbon substances, geothermal resources, coal or stone, metals, minerals, fossils and fertilizer of every name and description, in paying quantities, or uranium, thorium or any other material which THAT is or may be determined by the laws of the THIS state OR the United States or BY decisions of court to be peculiarly essential to the production of fissionable materials, whether or not of commercial value, and state lands adjoining lands upon ON which there are producing oil, gas or geothermal wells or adjoining lands known to contain any of such substances in paying quantities, or uranium, thorium or any other material peculiarly essential - 2 - S.B.
1066 to the production of fissionable materials, whether or not of commercial value, shall not be sold.
The prohibition against sale shall not operate to prevent the sale of lands known to contain, in paying quantities, common variety minerals as defined in section 27-271 or to prevent the sale of lands where the THIS state does not own such substances, minerals or metals in the lands sought to be sold.
The provisions of This subsection shall DOES not prohibit the sale of such lands located within the exterior boundaries of an incorporated city or town, in which case the commissioner may offer the land for sale, provided the land shall be used solely for a public purpose.
Such land shall revert to the THIS state if it is used other than for a public purpose.
E.
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection C of this section, all state lands sold after March 18, 1968 shall be sold with the reservation that all oil, gas, other hydrocarbon substances, helium or other substances of a gaseous nature, geothermal resources, coal, metals, minerals, fossils, fertilizer of every name and description, together with all uranium, all thorium or any other material which THAT is or may be determined by the laws of the United States or of this state, or BY decisions of court, to be peculiarly essential to the production of fissionable materials, whether or not of commercial value, and the exclusive right thereto, on, in, or under such land, shall be and remain and be reserved in and retained by the THIS state, regardless of any sale under this section and the issuance of any certificate of purchase to any purchaser of state lands pursuant to this section, provided, that the reservation shall not include common variety minerals as defined in section 27-271, subject to the following:
1.
The state land department shall adopt rules providing for the protection of the patentee or contract purchaser of state lands, or their successors in interest, and the THIS state of Arizona, against damage to the lands, livestock, water, crops, or other tangible improvements on lands held by such patentee or contract purchaser, and suffered by reason of the use or occupation of such lands by lessees or permittees engaged in mining and oil, gas and geothermal resource exploration and development under leases or permits executed by the department.
The state land department may, at any time, MAY require each of its lessees or permittees to execute a bond in a reasonable principal amount conditioned upon ON payment for all such damages.
2.
The mineral rights reserved to the THIS state in the lands sold shall be closed to entry and location as a mineral claim or claims, but the department may issue, upon ON application, mineral exploration permits embracing the reserved mineral rights when such issuance is deemed in the best interest of the THIS state, provided that the surface owner or owners shall have the first right of refusal to acquire such mineral exploration permits.
- 3 - S.B.
1066 Sec.
3.
Section 37-240, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
37-240.
Limits on sales of state lands;
definition A.
No A person may NOT purchase more than six hundred forty acres of grazing land, or more than one hundred sixty acres of agricultural land.
B.
No Sales, leases or subleases of state lands shall MAY NOT be made to corporations or associations not qualified to transact business in the THIS state.
C.
BEGINNING ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT TO THIS SECTION, SALES OF STATE LANDS MAY NOT BE MADE TO A FOREIGN ENTITY THAT IS HOSTILE TO THE UNITED STATES.
D.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "FOREIGN ENTITY THAT IS HOSTILE TO THE UNITED STATES" HAS THE SAME MEANING AS PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 33-459.
- 4 -
Show all 69 changed rows (29 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current pdf
- SENATE - Federalism View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Finchem flr amend (ref FED) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Teresa Martinez · Cosponsor
- John Gillette · Cosponsor
- Hildy Angius · Cosponsor
- Mark Finchem · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 89 not signed on · 34 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mark Finchem Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Teresa Martinez Republican
- John Gillette Republican
- Hildy Angius Republican
Not signed on (89)
89 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 89 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 21 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 31 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 31 | 21 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 35% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Nay |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Not Voting |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1066?
- SB 1066 is sponsored by Teresa Martinez (Republican), John Gillette (Republican), Hildy Angius (Republican), and Mark Finchem (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1066?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1066?
- Track SB 1066 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1066
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1066
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →