HB 2089 — subsequent AMA; voters; removal
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on April 15, 2025.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
7 added · 9 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to House Bill 2089 include the addition of specific wording about "subsequent AMA" and the removal of the reference title and introduction details. This adjustment clarifies the bill's focus and streamlines the text for easier understanding. These changes are important because they help ensure that voters are better informed about the bill's contents and purpose, making the legislative process more transparent.
PREFILEDHouse JANEngrossed 10subsequent 2025AMA; REFERENCE TITLE:
subsequent AMA;
removal State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session HBHOUSE BILL 2089 IntroducedAN byACT RepresentativesAMENDING Griffin:SECTION 45-415, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
Diaz, Hendrix;
Senators Gowan, Shamp AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 45-415, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - HBH.B. 2089 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
2089 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
The director shall also transmit to the county recorder all other factual data concerning the boundaries of the groundwater basin OR THE SUBSEQUENT ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION that may aid the county recorder in the determination of DETERMINING which registered voters of the county are residents of the - 1 - HBH.B. 2089 groundwater basin OR THE SUBSEQUENT ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION AND ARE ELIGIBLE VOTERS OR PETITIONERS.
2089 groundwater basin OR THE SUBSEQUENT ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION AND ARE ELIGIBLE VOTERS OR PETITIONERS.
If residency in the groundwater basin OR THE SUBSEQUENT ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A OF - 2 - HBH.B. 2089 THIS SECTION, AS APPLICABLE, is not verified, the ballot shall remain unopened and shall be destroyed.
2089 THIS SECTION, AS APPLICABLE, is not verified, the ballot shall remain unopened and shall be destroyed.
- 3 - HBH.B. 2089 F.
2089 F.
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill allows voters in a subsequent active management area to petition for its removal after ten years from its designation, adding procedures for the petition and election process.
-
Section 45-415
BEGINNING TEN YEARS AFTER A GROUNDWATER BASIN IS DESIGNATED AS A SUBSEQUENT ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION, TEN PERCENT OF THE REGISTERED VOTERS WHO RESIDE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SUBSEQUENT ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA, AS OF THE MOST RECENT REPORT COMPILED BY THE COUNTY RECORDER IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16-168, SUBSECTION H AND SUBSECTION C OF THIS SECTION, MAY FILE A PETITION IN EACH OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER IN WHICH THE SUBSEQUENT ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA IS LOCATED TO REMOVE THE SUBSEQUENT ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA DESIGNATION. THE PETITION SHALL BE FILED WITHIN ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY DAYS BEFORE THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION DATE.
This adds a provision for voters to petition for the removal of a designation after ten years.
-
Section 45-415
TO REMOVE A SUBSEQUENT ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA DESIGNATION PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION B OF THIS SECTION, THE BALLOT SHALL BE WORDED, "SHOULD THE SUBSEQUENT ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA DESIGNATION BE REMOVED FROM THE (INSERT NAME OF BASIN)?" FOLLOWED BY THE WORDS "YES" AND "NO".
This establishes the specific wording required for the ballot when voting on the removal of a subsequent active management area designation.
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Janae Shamp · Cosponsor
- David Gowan · Cosponsor
- Laurin Hendrix · Cosponsor
- Lupe Diaz · Cosponsor
- Gail Griffin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 88 not signed on · 41 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gail Griffin Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- Janae Shamp Republican
- David Gowan Republican
- Laurin Hendrix Republican
- Lupe Diaz Republican
Not signed on (88)
88 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 88 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 47% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Nay |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 32 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 32 | 27 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 45% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Nay |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Nay |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Nay |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Nay |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Not Voting |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2089?
- HB 2089 is sponsored by Janae Shamp (Republican), David Gowan (Republican), Laurin Hendrix (Republican), Lupe Diaz (Republican), and Gail Griffin (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2089?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2089?
- Track HB 2089 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2089
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2089
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →