SB 1164 — immigration laws; local enforcement
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on April 18, 2025.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
278 added · 344 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 1164 revised the language regarding how local law enforcement agencies can cooperate with federal immigration authorities. The requirement for law enforcement agencies to enter into a specific memorandum of agreement with federal immigration agencies by a set date has been removed. Instead, the bill now emphasizes the need for local agencies to avoid policies that limit cooperation with federal authorities. This change matters because it potentially simplifies the process for local governments and law enforcement, while reinforcing their responsibility to collaborate with federal immigration enforcement efforts.
Fifty-seventhSenate LegislatureEngrossed Militaryimmigration Affairslaws; and Border Security First Regular Session S.B.
1164local PROPOSEDenforcement State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE AMENDMENTSBILL TO1164 S.B.AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 11, CHAPTER 7, ARTICLE 8, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTIONS 11-1052, 11-1053, 11-1054 AND 11-1055;
1164RELATING (ReferenceTO toENFORCEMENT printedOF bill)IMMIGRATION AmendmentLAWS. instruction key:
[GREEN(TEXT UNDERLININGOF INBILL BRACKETS]BEGINS indicatesON textNEXT addedPAGE) to- statutei or- previouslyS.B. enacted session law.
[Green1164 underliningBe init brackets]enacted indicatesby textthe addedLegislature toof newthe sessionState lawof orArizona: text restoring existing law.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
attorney general investigations;
EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL USE ITS BEST EFFORTS TO SUPPORT THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS.
THIS SECTION APPLIES TO A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OFFICIAL, REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR EMPLOYEE ONLY WHEN THE OFFICIAL, REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR EMPLOYEE IS ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PERSON'S OFFICIAL DUTIES OR WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PERSON'S EMPLOYMENT.
B.
[C.B.
ONAN OFFICIAL OR BEFOREAGENCY JANUARYOF 1,THIS 2026,STATE EACHOR LAWA ENFORCEMENTCITY, AGENCYTOWN, SHALLCOUNTY ENTEROR INTOOTHER APOLITICAL MEMORANDUMSUBDIVISION OF AGREEMENTTHIS WITHSTATE THEMAY UNITEDNOT STATESESTABLISH, IMMIGRATIONADOPT ANDOR CUSTOMSENFORCE ENFORCEMENTANY TOPOLICY, PARTICIPATEPATTERN INOR THEPRACTICE IMMIGRATIONTHAT PROGRAMPROHIBITS ESTABLISHEDOR UNDERRESTRICTS 8COOPERATION UNITEDWITH STATESFEDERAL CODEIMMIGRATION SECTIONAUTHORITIES 1357(g).IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.
THEC. TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT MUST SUPPORT THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS.
THEEXCEPT AGREEMENTAS ENTEREDPROVIDED INTOBY PURSUANTFEDERAL TOLAW, 8AN UNITEDOFFICIAL STATESOR CODEAGENCY SECTIONOF 1357(g)THIS STATE OR A SIMILARCOUNTY, FEDERALCITY, PROGRAMTOWN SHALLOR DOOTHER ALLPOLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY NOT BE PROHIBITED FROM USING AVAILABLE FEDERAL RESOURCES, INCLUDING DATABASES, EQUIPMENT, GRANT MONIES, TRAINING OR PARTICIPATION IN INCENTIVE PROGRAMS FOR ANY PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSE RELATED TO THE FOLLOWING:ENFORCEMENT OF STATE AND FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS.
1.
BE ENTERED INTO IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW.
2.
INCLUDE PARTICIPATION BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN ALL APPLICABLE PROGRAMS THAT ARE AVAILABLE.
Senate Amendments to S.B.
1164 3.
ALLOW FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS TO THE FULL EXTENT ALLOWED UNDER FEDERAL LAW.
WHEN AREASONABLY LAWPOSSIBLE, ENFORCEMENTAPPLICABLE AGENCYSTATE ENTERSAGENCIES INTOSHALL ACONSIDER MEMORANDUMINCENTIVE OFPROGRAMS AGREEMENTAND PURSUANTGRANT TOFUNDING SUBSECTIONFOR CTHE PURPOSE OF THISASSISTING SECTION,AND WRITTENENCOURAGING NOTICEAN OFOFFICIAL THEOR MEMORANDUMAGENCY OF AGREEMENTTHIS SHALLSTATE BEOR SUBMITTEDA WITHINCOUNTY, THIRTYCITY, DAYSTOWN AFTEROR EXECUTIONOTHER TOPOLITICAL THESUBDIVISION GOVERNOR,OF THETHIS ATTORNEYSTATE GENERAL,TO THEENTER SECRETARYINTO OFAGREEMENTS STATE,WITH THEFEDERAL SPEAKERENTITIES OFAND THETO HOUSEUSE OFFEDERAL REPRESENTATIVESRESOURCES ANDCONSISTENT THEWITH PRESIDENTTHIS OFSECTION. THE SENATE.
ANY RENEWAL, MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE GOVERNOR, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE SECRETARY OF STATE, THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE RENEWAL, MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION.
ONTHIS SECTION OR BEFOREANY OCTOBER 1, 2025 AND CONTINUING QUARTERLY UNTIL THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY ENTERS INTO THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT REQUIREDAUTHORIZED PURSUANTBY TOTHIS SUBSECTIONSECTION CDOES OFNOT THISPREVENT SECTION,ANY EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCYAGENCY, SHALLCOUNTY, NOTIFYCITY, THETOWN GOVERNOR,OR THEOTHER ATTORNEYPOLITICAL GENERAL,SUBDIVISION THE SPEAKER OF THETHIS HOUSESTATE OFFROM REPRESENTATIVESENFORCING ANDIMMIGRATION THELAWS PRESIDENTAS OFAUTHORIZED THEPURSUANT SENATETO OFFEDERAL THELAWS STATUS OF THE WRITTEN AGREEMENT AND THE REASONSLAWS FOROF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION.STATE.
AIN LAWADDITION ENFORCEMENTTO AGENCYANY SHALLOTHER ENSURECAUSES THATOF ATACTION LEASTOR TENREMEDIES PERCENTAVAILABLE OFTO THE LAWATTORNEY ENFORCEMENTGENERAL, OFFICERSA EMPLOYEDCOUNTY BYATTORNEY OR ANY OTHER PARTY WITH STANDING, AT THE LAWWRITTEN ENFORCEMENTREQUEST AGENCYOF AREA TRAINEDMEMBER INOF ACCORDANCETHE WITHLEGISLATURE, THE TERMSATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL INVESTIGATE ANY ORDINANCE, REGULATION, ORDER, POLICY, PATTERN OR PRACTICE OF A CITY, TOWN OR COUNTY OR ANY MEMORANDUMAGENCY, DEPARTMENT OR OTHER ENTITY OF AGREEMENTA ENTEREDCITY, INTOTOWN WITHOR COUNTY THAT THE UNITEDMEMBER STATESOF IMMIGRATIONTHE ANDLEGISLATURE CUSTOMSALLEGES ENFORCEMENTVIOLATES PURSUANTSUBSECTION TOB OF THIS SECTION.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL HAVE THE SAME INVESTIGATIVE POWERS PROVIDED IN SECTION 38-431.06, SUBSECTION B AND MAY FILE AN ACTION IN SUPERIOR COURT TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY INVESTIGATIVE REQUEST OR DEMAND.
AN ACTION FILED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION SHALL BE GIVEN - 1 - S.B.
1164 PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER CASES.
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER THE REQUEST OF THE MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE, EXCLUDING ANY TIME IN WHICH AN ACTION TO ENFORCE AN INVESTIGATIVE REQUEST OR DEMAND IS PENDING, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL MAKE A WRITTEN REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 41-194.01, SUBSECTION B AND SHALL FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES OF SECTION 41-194.01, SUBSECTION B FOR ANY VIOLATION OR POTENTIAL VIOLATION.
ONFOR OR BEFORE JANUARY 31 OF EACH YEAR, EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR,PURPOSES THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE SECRETARY OF STATE,THIS THESECTION: SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE THAT IDENTIFIES BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING:
THE NUMBER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ELIGIBLE FOR TRAINING PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION F OF THIS SECTION DURING THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR.
2.
THE NUMBER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TRAINED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION F OF THIS SECTION DURING THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR.] [C.
AN OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A CITY, TOWN, COUNTY OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY NOT ESTABLISH, ADOPT OR ENFORCE ANY POLICY, PATTERN OR PRACTICE THAT PROHIBITS OR RESTRICTS COOPERATION WITH FEDERAL IMMIGRATION AUTHORITIES IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.] [H.] [D.] EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY FEDERAL LAW, AN OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY NOT BE PROHIBITED FROM USING AVAILABLE FEDERAL RESOURCES, INCLUDING DATABASES, EQUIPMENT, GRANT MONIES, TRAINING OR PARTICIPATION IN INCENTIVE PROGRAMS FOR ANY PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSE RELATED TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF STATE AND FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS.
[I.] [E.] WHEN REASONABLY POSSIBLE, APPLICABLE STATE AGENCIES SHALL CONSIDER INCENTIVE PROGRAMS AND GRANT FUNDING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING AND ENCOURAGING AN OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, -2- Senate Amendments to S.B.
1164 CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS WITH FEDERAL ENTITIES AND TO USE FEDERAL RESOURCES CONSISTENT WITH THIS SECTION.
Show all 85 changed lines (45 more)
[J.] [F.] THIS SECTION OR ANY MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AUTHORIZED BY THIS SECTION DOES NOT PREVENT ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE FROM ENFORCING IMMIGRATION LAWS AS AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL LAWS AND THE LAWS OF THIS STATE.
[G.
A CITY, TOWN OR COUNTY OR ANY AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OR OTHER ENTITY OF A CITY, TOWN OR COUNTY THAT VIOLATES SUBSECTION C OF THIS SECTION IS SUBJECT TO SECTION 41-194.01, INCLUDING INVESTIGATION, REPORTING AND ENFORCEMENT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
THIS SUBSECTION APPLIES WHETHER THE POLICY, PATTERN, PRACTICE OR REGULATION IS WRITTEN OR UNWRITTEN AND WHETHER THE ACTION IS OFFICIAL OR UNOFFICIAL.] [K.] [H.] FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
1.
[(c)(c) THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.
(d) A MUNICIPAL POLICE DEPARTMENT.]DEPARTMENT. 2.
2.
THE IMMIGRATION DETAINER REQUEST ISSUED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE A FACIALLY SUFFICIENT WRITTEN OR ELECTRONIC REQUEST ISSUED BY THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT USING THAT AGENCY'S OFFICIAL FORM TO REQUEST THAT ANOTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY DETAIN A PERSON BASED ON PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE PERSON TO BE DETAINED IS A REMOVABLE ALIEN UNDER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS, INCLUDING IMMIGRATION DETAINERS ISSUED PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE -3-SECTIONS Senate1226 AmendmentsAND to1357 S.B.ALONG WITH A WARRANT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION C, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THIS SECTION.
1164 SECTIONS 1226 AND 1357 ALONG WITH A WARRANT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION C, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THIS SECTION.
THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL FORM IS COMPLETE AND INDICATES ON ITS FACE THAT THE FEDERAL IMMIGRATION OFFICIAL- HAS2 PROBABLE- CAUSES.B. TO BELIEVE THAT THE PERSON TO BE DETAINED IS A REMOVABLE ALIEN UNDER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.
1164 OFFICIAL HAS PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE PERSON TO BE DETAINED IS A REMOVABLE ALIEN UNDER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY" [HASMEANS: THE SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 11-1052.][MEANS:
THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.]CORRECTIONS. 11-1054.
11-1054.
THE DIRECTOR OF EACH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY [WITHINWITHIN THE CONTROL OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OR A COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE]OFFICE SHALL ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT OR AGREEMENTS WITH THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION -4-AND SenateCUSTOMS AmendmentsENFORCEMENT toFOR S.B.TEMPORARY HOUSING OF PERSONS WHO ARE THE SUBJECT OF IMMIGRATION DETAINERS AND FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE COSTS OF HOUSING AND DETAINING PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO IMMIGRATION DETAINERS.
1164 AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT FOR TEMPORARY HOUSING OF PERSONS WHO ARE THE SUBJECT OF IMMIGRATION DETAINERS AND FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE COSTS OF HOUSING AND DETAINING PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO IMMIGRATION DETAINERS.
B.- 3 - S.B.
1164 B.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "CORRECTIONAL FACILITY" MEANS ANY PLACE USED BY [ATHE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 11-1052][THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OR A COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE]OFFICE FOR THE CONFINEMENT OR CONTROL OF A PERSON FOR ONE OF THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
-5-1. Senate Amendments to S.B.
1164 1.
<<Sec.- 4 - S.B.
1164 Sec.
Appropriations;
state treasurer;
state department of corrections;
enforcement of federal immigration and detention laws;
exemption [A.
The sum of $____________ is appropriated from the state general fund in fiscal year 2025-2026 to the state treasurer to distribute to county sheriffs' offices for the purposes of administering this act.
B.
The sum of $____________ is appropriated from the state general fund in fiscal year 2025-2026 to the state department of corrections for the purposes of administering this act.
C.
The appropriation made in subsections A and B of this section is exempt from the provisions of section 35-190, Arizona Revised Statutes, relating to lapsing of appropriations.]>> Sec.
2.
Jennie Taer, Migrant charged with Laken Riley's murder easily entered US despite links to bloodthirsty gang, bombshell -6-Post Senateprobe Amendmentsreveals, toNew S.B.York Post (Mar.
1164 Post probe reveals, New York Post (Mar.
A recent report estimated that the four hundred fifty-three thousand aliens who are unlawfully present in Arizona in 2023 cost Arizona taxpayers- $3,190,000.0005 that- year.S.B.
1164 taxpayers $3,190,000.000 that year.
That all appropriate state officials and law enforcement agencies are to vigorously pursue all federal [moneys]monies [monies] to which the state may be entitled for the reimbursement of [moneys]monies [monies] spent to comply with federal immigration laws.
Severability If a provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the act that can be given effect without the -7-invalid Senateprovision Amendmentsor application, and to S.B.this end the provisions of this act are severable.
1164 invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are severable.
Enroll- and6 engross- to conform Amend title to conform DAVID GOWAN 1164GOWAN 02/14/2025 3:01 PM C:
LAT 1164GOWAN 02/14/2025 4:06 PM S:
KJA/ci -8-
Show all 85 changed rows (45 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current pdf
- SENATE - Military Affairs and Border Security View text pdf
- HOUSE - Government - Strike Everything View text pdf
- Amended SENATE - Petersen flr amend (ref MABS) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
W/D
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Thomas "T.J." Shope · Cosponsor
- Warren Petersen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on · 38 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Warren Petersen Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican
Not signed on (91)
91 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 91 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 26 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 26 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 43% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Nay |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Nay |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Nay |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Nay |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 40% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1164?
- SB 1164 is sponsored by Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican) and Warren Petersen (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1164?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1164?
- Track SB 1164 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1164
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1164
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →