Arizona 57th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: To Executive 2 R cosponsors

SB 1164 — immigration laws; local enforcement

Last action — Vetoed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on April 18, 2025.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

278 added · 344 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to SB 1164 revised the language regarding how local law enforcement agencies can cooperate with federal immigration authorities. The requirement for law enforcement agencies to enter into a specific memorandum of agreement with federal immigration agencies by a set date has been removed. Instead, the bill now emphasizes the need for local agencies to avoid policies that limit cooperation with federal authorities. This change matters because it potentially simplifies the process for local governments and law enforcement, while reinforcing their responsibility to collaborate with federal immigration enforcement efforts.

→
Previous
Latest
Fifty-seventh Legislature Military Affairs and Border Security First Regular Session S.B.
Senate Engrossed immigration laws;
1164 PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
local enforcement State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1164 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 11, CHAPTER 7, ARTICLE 8, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTIONS 11-1052, 11-1053, 11-1054 AND 11-1055;
1164 (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
RELATING TO ENFORCEMENT OF IMMIGRATION LAWS.
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
1164 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
attorney general investigations;
EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL USE ITS BEST EFFORTS TO SUPPORT THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS.
THIS SECTION APPLIES TO A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OFFICIAL, REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR EMPLOYEE ONLY WHEN THE OFFICIAL, REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR EMPLOYEE IS ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PERSON'S OFFICIAL DUTIES OR WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PERSON'S EMPLOYMENT.
B.
[C.
B.
ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 1, 2026, EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL ENTER INTO A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE IMMIGRATION PROGRAM ESTABLISHED UNDER 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1357(g).
AN OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A CITY, TOWN, COUNTY OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY NOT ESTABLISH, ADOPT OR ENFORCE ANY POLICY, PATTERN OR PRACTICE THAT PROHIBITS OR RESTRICTS COOPERATION WITH FEDERAL IMMIGRATION AUTHORITIES IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.
THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT MUST SUPPORT THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS.
C.
THE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1357(g) OR A SIMILAR FEDERAL PROGRAM SHALL DO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY FEDERAL LAW, AN OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY NOT BE PROHIBITED FROM USING AVAILABLE FEDERAL RESOURCES, INCLUDING DATABASES, EQUIPMENT, GRANT MONIES, TRAINING OR PARTICIPATION IN INCENTIVE PROGRAMS FOR ANY PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSE RELATED TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF STATE AND FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS.
1.
BE ENTERED INTO IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW.
2.
INCLUDE PARTICIPATION BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN ALL APPLICABLE PROGRAMS THAT ARE AVAILABLE.
Senate Amendments to S.B.
1164 3.
ALLOW FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS TO THE FULL EXTENT ALLOWED UNDER FEDERAL LAW.
WHEN A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY ENTERS INTO A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION C OF THIS SECTION, WRITTEN NOTICE OF THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER EXECUTION TO THE GOVERNOR, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE SECRETARY OF STATE, THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE.
WHEN REASONABLY POSSIBLE, APPLICABLE STATE AGENCIES SHALL CONSIDER INCENTIVE PROGRAMS AND GRANT FUNDING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING AND ENCOURAGING AN OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS WITH FEDERAL ENTITIES AND TO USE FEDERAL RESOURCES CONSISTENT WITH THIS SECTION.
ANY RENEWAL, MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE GOVERNOR, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE SECRETARY OF STATE, THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE RENEWAL, MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION.
ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 1, 2025 AND CONTINUING QUARTERLY UNTIL THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY ENTERS INTO THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION C OF THIS SECTION, EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL NOTIFY THE GOVERNOR, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE OF THE STATUS OF THE WRITTEN AGREEMENT AND THE REASONS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION.
THIS SECTION OR ANY MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AUTHORIZED BY THIS SECTION DOES NOT PREVENT ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE FROM ENFORCING IMMIGRATION LAWS AS AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL LAWS AND THE LAWS OF THIS STATE.
A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL ENSURE THAT AT LEAST TEN PERCENT OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS EMPLOYED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY ARE TRAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF ANY MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO WITH THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER CAUSES OF ACTION OR REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, A COUNTY ATTORNEY OR ANY OTHER PARTY WITH STANDING, AT THE WRITTEN REQUEST OF A MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL INVESTIGATE ANY ORDINANCE, REGULATION, ORDER, POLICY, PATTERN OR PRACTICE OF A CITY, TOWN OR COUNTY OR ANY AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OR OTHER ENTITY OF A CITY, TOWN OR COUNTY THAT THE MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE ALLEGES VIOLATES SUBSECTION B OF THIS SECTION.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL HAVE THE SAME INVESTIGATIVE POWERS PROVIDED IN SECTION 38-431.06, SUBSECTION B AND MAY FILE AN ACTION IN SUPERIOR COURT TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH ANY INVESTIGATIVE REQUEST OR DEMAND.
AN ACTION FILED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION SHALL BE GIVEN - 1 - S.B.
1164 PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER CASES.
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER THE REQUEST OF THE MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATURE, EXCLUDING ANY TIME IN WHICH AN ACTION TO ENFORCE AN INVESTIGATIVE REQUEST OR DEMAND IS PENDING, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL MAKE A WRITTEN REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 41-194.01, SUBSECTION B AND SHALL FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES OF SECTION 41-194.01, SUBSECTION B FOR ANY VIOLATION OR POTENTIAL VIOLATION.
ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 31 OF EACH YEAR, EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE SECRETARY OF STATE, THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE THAT IDENTIFIES BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING:
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
THE NUMBER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ELIGIBLE FOR TRAINING PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION F OF THIS SECTION DURING THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR.
2.
THE NUMBER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TRAINED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION F OF THIS SECTION DURING THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR.] [C.
AN OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A CITY, TOWN, COUNTY OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY NOT ESTABLISH, ADOPT OR ENFORCE ANY POLICY, PATTERN OR PRACTICE THAT PROHIBITS OR RESTRICTS COOPERATION WITH FEDERAL IMMIGRATION AUTHORITIES IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.] [H.] [D.] EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY FEDERAL LAW, AN OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY NOT BE PROHIBITED FROM USING AVAILABLE FEDERAL RESOURCES, INCLUDING DATABASES, EQUIPMENT, GRANT MONIES, TRAINING OR PARTICIPATION IN INCENTIVE PROGRAMS FOR ANY PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSE RELATED TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF STATE AND FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS.
[I.] [E.] WHEN REASONABLY POSSIBLE, APPLICABLE STATE AGENCIES SHALL CONSIDER INCENTIVE PROGRAMS AND GRANT FUNDING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING AND ENCOURAGING AN OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, -2- Senate Amendments to S.B.
1164 CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENTS WITH FEDERAL ENTITIES AND TO USE FEDERAL RESOURCES CONSISTENT WITH THIS SECTION.
Show all 85 changed rows (45 more)
Previous
Latest
[J.] [F.] THIS SECTION OR ANY MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AUTHORIZED BY THIS SECTION DOES NOT PREVENT ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE FROM ENFORCING IMMIGRATION LAWS AS AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL LAWS AND THE LAWS OF THIS STATE.
[G.
A CITY, TOWN OR COUNTY OR ANY AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OR OTHER ENTITY OF A CITY, TOWN OR COUNTY THAT VIOLATES SUBSECTION C OF THIS SECTION IS SUBJECT TO SECTION 41-194.01, INCLUDING INVESTIGATION, REPORTING AND ENFORCEMENT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
THIS SUBSECTION APPLIES WHETHER THE POLICY, PATTERN, PRACTICE OR REGULATION IS WRITTEN OR UNWRITTEN AND WHETHER THE ACTION IS OFFICIAL OR UNOFFICIAL.] [K.] [H.] FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
1.
[(c) THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.
(c) THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.
(d) A MUNICIPAL POLICE DEPARTMENT.] 2.
(d) A MUNICIPAL POLICE DEPARTMENT.
2.
THE IMMIGRATION DETAINER REQUEST ISSUED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE A FACIALLY SUFFICIENT WRITTEN OR ELECTRONIC REQUEST ISSUED BY THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT USING THAT AGENCY'S OFFICIAL FORM TO REQUEST THAT ANOTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY DETAIN A PERSON BASED ON PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE PERSON TO BE DETAINED IS A REMOVABLE ALIEN UNDER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS, INCLUDING IMMIGRATION DETAINERS ISSUED PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE -3- Senate Amendments to S.B.
THE IMMIGRATION DETAINER REQUEST ISSUED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE A FACIALLY SUFFICIENT WRITTEN OR ELECTRONIC REQUEST ISSUED BY THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT USING THAT AGENCY'S OFFICIAL FORM TO REQUEST THAT ANOTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY DETAIN A PERSON BASED ON PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE PERSON TO BE DETAINED IS A REMOVABLE ALIEN UNDER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS, INCLUDING IMMIGRATION DETAINERS ISSUED PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTIONS 1226 AND 1357 ALONG WITH A WARRANT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION C, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THIS SECTION.
1164 SECTIONS 1226 AND 1357 ALONG WITH A WARRANT DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION C, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THIS SECTION.
THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL FORM IS COMPLETE AND INDICATES ON ITS FACE THAT THE FEDERAL IMMIGRATION OFFICIAL HAS PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE PERSON TO BE DETAINED IS A REMOVABLE ALIEN UNDER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.
THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL FORM IS COMPLETE AND INDICATES ON ITS FACE THAT THE FEDERAL IMMIGRATION - 2 - S.B.
1164 OFFICIAL HAS PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE PERSON TO BE DETAINED IS A REMOVABLE ALIEN UNDER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW.
FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY" [HAS THE SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 11-1052.][MEANS:
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY" MEANS:
THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.] 11-1054.
THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.
11-1054.
THE DIRECTOR OF EACH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY [WITHIN THE CONTROL OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OR A COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE] SHALL ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT OR AGREEMENTS WITH THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION -4- Senate Amendments to S.B.
THE DIRECTOR OF EACH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WITHIN THE CONTROL OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OR A COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE SHALL ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT OR AGREEMENTS WITH THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT FOR TEMPORARY HOUSING OF PERSONS WHO ARE THE SUBJECT OF IMMIGRATION DETAINERS AND FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE COSTS OF HOUSING AND DETAINING PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO IMMIGRATION DETAINERS.
1164 AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT FOR TEMPORARY HOUSING OF PERSONS WHO ARE THE SUBJECT OF IMMIGRATION DETAINERS AND FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE COSTS OF HOUSING AND DETAINING PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO IMMIGRATION DETAINERS.
B.
- 3 - S.B.
1164 B.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "CORRECTIONAL FACILITY" MEANS ANY PLACE USED BY [A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 11-1052][THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OR A COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE] FOR THE CONFINEMENT OR CONTROL OF A PERSON FOR ONE OF THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "CORRECTIONAL FACILITY" MEANS ANY PLACE USED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OR A COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE FOR THE CONFINEMENT OR CONTROL OF A PERSON FOR ONE OF THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
-5- Senate Amendments to S.B.
1.
1164 1.
<<Sec.
- 4 - S.B.
1164 Sec.
Appropriations;
state treasurer;
state department of corrections;
enforcement of federal immigration and detention laws;
exemption [A.
The sum of $____________ is appropriated from the state general fund in fiscal year 2025-2026 to the state treasurer to distribute to county sheriffs' offices for the purposes of administering this act.
B.
The sum of $____________ is appropriated from the state general fund in fiscal year 2025-2026 to the state department of corrections for the purposes of administering this act.
C.
The appropriation made in subsections A and B of this section is exempt from the provisions of section 35-190, Arizona Revised Statutes, relating to lapsing of appropriations.]>> Sec.
2.
Jennie Taer, Migrant charged with Laken Riley's murder easily entered US despite links to bloodthirsty gang, bombshell -6- Senate Amendments to S.B.
Jennie Taer, Migrant charged with Laken Riley's murder easily entered US despite links to bloodthirsty gang, bombshell Post probe reveals, New York Post (Mar.
1164 Post probe reveals, New York Post (Mar.
A recent report estimated that the four hundred fifty-three thousand aliens who are unlawfully present in Arizona in 2023 cost Arizona taxpayers $3,190,000.000 that year.
A recent report estimated that the four hundred fifty-three thousand aliens who are unlawfully present in Arizona in 2023 cost Arizona - 5 - S.B.
1164 taxpayers $3,190,000.000 that year.
That all appropriate state officials and law enforcement agencies are to vigorously pursue all federal [moneys] [monies] to which the state may be entitled for the reimbursement of [moneys] [monies] spent to comply with federal immigration laws.
That all appropriate state officials and law enforcement agencies are to vigorously pursue all federal monies to which the state may be entitled for the reimbursement of monies spent to comply with federal immigration laws.
Severability If a provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the act that can be given effect without the -7- Senate Amendments to S.B.
Severability If a provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the act that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are severable.
1164 invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are severable.
Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform DAVID GOWAN 1164GOWAN 02/14/2025 3:01 PM C:
- 6 -
LAT 1164GOWAN 02/14/2025 4:06 PM S:
KJA/ci -8-
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. Vetoed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. Transmit to Senate

  4. PASSED

  5. DP

  6. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  7. DP

  8. House Second Reading

  9. House First Reading.

  10. Transmit to House

  11. PASSED

  12. DPA

  13. W/D

  14. DPA

  15. Senate Second Reading

  16. Senate First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on · 38 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (91)

91 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 91 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 33 Yea · 26 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 02601
Republican 33000
Total 332601
% of votes cast 55%43%0%2%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Anna Abeytia Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Not Voting
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Nay
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Nay
Kevin Volk Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Nay
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Nay
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Nay
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Yea
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Yea
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 17 Yea · 12 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 01201
Republican 17000
Total 171201
% of votes cast 57%40%0%3%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Burch Democrat Not Voting
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Nay
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1164?
SB 1164 is sponsored by Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican) and Warren Petersen (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1164?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1164?
Track SB 1164 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1164

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1164

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →