Arizona 57th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: Passed House 2 R cosponsors

HB 2296 — shared parenting time; presumption; prohibition

Last action — Senate Second Reading

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

243 added · 277 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to House Bill 2296 clarify how courts will determine parenting time and legal decision-making in child custody cases. The new version emphasizes the importance of shared parenting time while still allowing for the court to consider the best interests of the child, including their relationships and adjustments to life. This matters because it aims to ensure that children maintain strong connections with both parents, promoting healthier family dynamics after separation or divorce.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE FLOOR AMENDMENT EXPLANATION Bill Number:
House Engrossed shared parenting time;
HB 2296 Fink Floor Amendment • Changes the factors the court must consider regarding the best interest of the child when determining parenting time to:
presumption;
1) prioritizing the child and their primary caregiver's bond;
prohibition State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2296 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 25-403, 25-403.01, 25-403.02 AND 25-411, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
2) preservation of the child's existing schedule;
RELATING TO PARENTING TIME.
and 3) the wishes of the child, if the child is of suitable age and maturity.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - H.B.
• Includes additional factors the court may consider when making a parenting time determination including:
2296 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
1) instances of domestic violence, abuse or neglect;
2) if a parent has a history of substance abuse;
3) if a parent has been convicted of false reporting of abuse or neglect;
and 4) if a parent has intentionally misled the court.
• Specifies the court must make specified findings on the record when determining temporary and final orders in a parenting time case.
• Removes language requiring that a parent, who is not granted legal decision- making, has meaningful contact with the child.
• Removes language requiring parents to submit proposed parenting plans to the court and that requires the court to maximize each parents parenting time.
• Specifies serious danger to the child is required to restrict a parent's parenting time rights.
• Removes language allowing the court to determine additional factors necessary to promote the best interest of the child.
Amendment explanation prepared by S.
Robinson Phone Number 6-3273 jh 2/21/2025 Fifty-seventh Legislature Fink First Regular Session H.B.
2296 FINK FLOOR AMENDMENT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
2296 (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
The court shall determine [legal decision-making and] parenting time, either originally or on petition for modification, in accordance with the best interests of the child.
The court shall determine legal decision-making and parenting time, either originally or on petition for modification, in accordance with the best interests of the child.
[1.
1.
House Amendments to H.B.
8.
2296 8.
Whether either parent was convicted of an act of false reporting of child abuse or neglect under section 13-2907.02.] [1.
Whether either parent was convicted of an act of false reporting of child abuse or neglect under section 13-2907.02.
1.
PRESERVATION OF THE CHILD'S EXISTING SCHEDULE TO MAINTAIN STABILITY.
THE INTERACTION AND INTERRELATIONSHIP OF THE CHILD WITH THE CHILD'S PARENTS, SIBLINGS AND ANY OTHER PERSON WHO MAY SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT THE CHILD'S BEST INTEREST.
IF THE CHILD IS OF SUITABLE AGE AND MATURITY, THE WISHES OF THE CHILD AS TO PARENTING TIME.] B.
THE PRESERVATION OF THE CHILD'S EXISTING SCHEDULE TO MAINTAIN STABILITY.
IN MAKING A DETERMINATION REGARDING PARENTING TIME, THE COURT SHALL NOT PRESUME THAT A PARENTING PLAN THAT REFLECTS SHARED PARENTING TIME BETWEEN THE PARTIES IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD.
4.
[THE COURT MAY CONSIDER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING FACTORS WHEN MAKING A PARENTING TIME DETERMINATION:
1.
2.
- 1 - H.B.
2296 5.
IF THE CHILD IS OF SUITABLE AGE AND MATURITY, THE WISHES OF THE CHILD AS TO PARENTING TIME.
Show all 85 changed rows (45 more)
Previous
Latest
6.
THE SAFETY AND WELL-BEING OF THE CHILD.
7.
3.
B.
IN MAKING A DETERMINATION REGARDING PARENTING TIME, THE COURT MAY CONSIDER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING FACTORS WHEN MAKING A PARENTING TIME DETERMINATION:
1.
2.
WHETHER ONE PARENT INTENTIONALLY MISLED THE COURT TO CAUSE AN UNNECESSARY DELAY, TO INCREASE THE COST OF LITIGATION OR TO PERSUADE THE COURT TO GIVE A PARENTING TIME PREFERENCE TO THAT PARENT.
3.
THE CHILD'S ADJUSTMENT TO HOME, SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY.
WHETHER ONE PARENT INTENTIONALLY MISLED THE COURT TO CAUSE AN UNNECESSARY DELAY, TO INCREASE THE COST OF LITIGATION OR TO PERSUADE THE COURT TO GIVE A PARENTING TIME PREFERENCE TO THAT PARENT.] B.
THE MENTAL AND PHYSICAL HEALTH OF ALL INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED.
B.
In a contested [legal decision-making or] parenting time case, [WHEN DETERMINING BOTH TEMPORARY ORDERS AND FINAL ORDERS,] the court shall make specific findings on the record about all relevant factors and the reasons for which the decision is in the best interests of the child.
In a contested legal decision-making or parenting time case, WHEN DETERMINING BOTH TEMPORARY ORDERS AND FINAL ORDERS, the court shall make specific findings on the record about all relevant factors and the reasons for which the decision is in the best interests of the child.
<<Sec.
Sec.
In determining the level of decision-making that is in the child's best interests, the court shall consider the factors prescribed in section 25-403, [subsection] [SUBSECTIONS] A [AND B] and all of the following:
In determining the level of decision-making that is in the child's best interests, the court shall consider the factors prescribed in section 25-403, subsection SUBSECTIONS A AND B and all of the following:
-2- House Amendments to H.B.
3.
2296 3.
[D.
- 2 - H.B.
A parent who is not granted sole or joint legal decision-making is entitled to reasonable parenting time to ensure that the minor child has substantial, frequent, meaningful and continuing contact with the parent unless the court finds, after a hearing, that parenting time would endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.]>> Sec.
2296 D.
A parent who is not granted sole or joint legal decision-making is entitled to reasonable parenting time to ensure that the minor child has substantial, frequent, meaningful and continuing contact with the parent unless the court finds, after a hearing, that parenting time would endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.
Sec.
Parenting plans [A.
Parenting plans A.
The court shall not prefer a parent's proposed plan because of the parent's or child's gender.] [C.] [A.] Parenting plans shall include at least the following:
The court shall not prefer a parent's proposed plan because of the parent's or child's gender.
C.
A.
Parenting plans shall include at least the following:
[D.] [B.] If the parents are unable to agree on any element to be included in a parenting plan, the court shall determine that -3- House Amendments to H.B.
D.
2296 element.
B.
[The court may determine other factors that are necessary to promote and protect the emotional and physical health of the child.] [IN MAKING A DETERMINATION REGARDING PARENTING TIME, THE COURT SHALL NOT PRESUME THAT A PARENTING PLAN THAT REFLECTS SHARED PARENTING TIME BETWEEN THE PARTIES IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD.] [E.] [C.] Shared legal decision-making does not necessarily mean equal parenting time.
If the parents are unable to agree on any element to be included in a parenting plan, the court shall determine that element.
Sec.
The court may determine other factors that are necessary to promote and protect the emotional and physical health of the child.
E.
C.
Shared legal decision-making does not necessarily mean equal parenting time.
- 3 - H.B.
2296 Sec.
A military parent who has legal decision-making or parenting time pursuant to an existing court order has received notice from military -4- House Amendments to H.B.
A military parent who has legal decision-making or parenting time pursuant to an existing court order has received notice from military leadership that the military parent will deploy or mobilize in the near future.
2296 leadership that the military parent will deploy or mobilize in the near future.
E.
- 4 - H.B.
2296 E.
The court may modify an order granting or denying parenting time rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of the child, -5- House Amendments to H.B.
The court may modify an order granting or denying parenting time rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of the child, but the court shall not restrict a parent's parenting time rights unless it finds that the parenting time would endanger seriously ENDANGER the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.
2296 but the court shall not restrict a parent's parenting time rights unless it finds that the parenting time would [endanger] [seriously] [ENDANGER] the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.
IN GRANTING OR - 5 - H.B.
IN GRANTING OR DENYING A REQUESTED PARENTING TIME MODIFICATION, THE COURT SHALL NOT PRESUME THAT A PARENTING TIME SCHEDULE THAT REFLECTS SHARED PARENTING TIME BETWEEN THE PARTIES IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD.
2296 DENYING A REQUESTED PARENTING TIME MODIFICATION, THE COURT SHALL NOT PRESUME THAT A PARENTING TIME SCHEDULE THAT REFLECTS SHARED PARENTING TIME BETWEEN THE PARTIES IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD.
[N.
N.
Subsection L of this section does not apply if the requested relief is for the modification or clarification of parenting time and not for a change of legal decision-making.] Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform LISA FINK 2296FloorFINK2.docx 02/20/2025 2:49 PM C:
Subsection L of this section does not apply if the requested relief is for the modification or clarification of parenting time and not for a change of legal decision-making.
LAT -6-
- 6 -
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. Senate Second Reading

  2. Senate First Reading

  3. Transmit to Senate

  4. PASSED

  5. DPA

  6. PASSED

  7. DPA

  8. PASSED

  9. DPA

  10. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  11. DP

  12. House Second Reading

  13. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on · 21 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (91)

91 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 91 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 37 Yea · 21 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 81801
Republican 29301
Total 372102
% of votes cast 62%35%0%3%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Anna Abeytia Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Yea
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Yea
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Not Voting
Kevin Volk Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Yea
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Yea
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Yea
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Yea
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Nay
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Yea
Seth Blattman Democrat Nay
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Nay
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Not Voting
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Yea
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Nay
Nick Kupper Republican Nay
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2296?
HB 2296 is sponsored by Rachel Keshel (Republican) and Lisa Fink (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 2296?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2296?
Track HB 2296 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2296

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2296

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →