HB 2202 — subsequent AMA; previously nonirrigated land
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on April 15, 2025.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
14 added · 15 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of House Bill 2202 has added a reference to "subsequent AMA; previously nonirrigated land." This change clarifies that the bill will include specific provisions about areas that were previously not used for irrigation but are now being addressed in the legislation. It matters because it ensures that these previously nonirrigated lands are considered in the context of future land management, which could affect farming and water resource policies in those areas.
REFERENCEHouse TITLE:Engrossed subsequent AMA;
subsequentpreviously AMA;nonirrigated land State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2202 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 45-452, 45-470, 45-472, 45-473 AND 45-512, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
previously nonirrigated land State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session HB 2202 Introduced by Representative Griffin AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 45-452, 45-470, 45-472, 45-473 AND 45-512, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - HBH.B. 2202 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
2202 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
- 1 - HBH.B. 2202 2.
2202 2.
- 2 - HBH.B. 2202 4.
2202 4.
This paragraph does not allow - 3 - HBH.B. 2202 irrigation of land which THAT could not have been legally irrigated under section 45-437.
2202 irrigation of land which THAT could not have been legally irrigated under section 45-437.
- 4 - HBH.B. 2202 J.
2202 J.
- 5 - HBH.B. 2202 Sec.
2202 Sec.
- 6 - HBH.B. 2202 B.
2202 B.
- 7 - HBH.B. 2202 (b) Three acre-feet per year multiplied by the number of water duty acres in the farm in which the acre to which the right is appurtenant is located divided by the number of irrigation acres in the farm.
2202 (b) Three acre-feet per year multiplied by the number of water duty acres in the farm in which the acre to which the right is appurtenant is located divided by the number of irrigation acres in the farm.
The amount of groundwater conveyed pursuant to the right for a non-irrigation use, as determined in paragraph 1 of this subsection, may be withdrawn by the new owner of the right only from the land to which the right is appurtenant and used on that land or on any other land, subject - 8 - HBH.B. 2202 to section 45-473.01 and to the provisions of articles 8 and 8.1 of this chapter relating to transportation of groundwater, except that, if the groundwater was delivered by an irrigation district to the previous owner of the right, the irrigation district may continue to deliver groundwater to the new owner pursuant to the right.
2202 to section 45-473.01 and to the provisions of articles 8 and 8.1 of this chapter relating to transportation of groundwater, except that, if the groundwater was delivered by an irrigation district to the previous owner of the right, the irrigation district may continue to deliver groundwater to the new owner pursuant to the right.
- 9 - HBH.B. 2202 H.
2202 H.
If any portion of the amount of groundwater conveyed is withdrawn by the new owner and used on other land, no additional groundwater may be withdrawn for use on the land to which the right is appurtenant, except that, if the new owner is an industry, it may withdraw a portion of the amount of - 10 - HBH.B. 2202 groundwater conveyed for use on other land and withdraw the remainder of the amount of groundwater conveyed for municipal and industrial use on the land to which the right is appurtenant for purposes directly related to the industry's industrial operation.
2202 groundwater conveyed for use on other land and withdraw the remainder of the amount of groundwater conveyed for municipal and industrial use on the land to which the right is appurtenant for purposes directly related to the industry's industrial operation.
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends various sections of Arizona law to modify the regulations surrounding groundwater rights and irrigation practices in active management areas.
-
45-452
and J→ and KThis change adds 'K' as a new exemption category for irrigated acreage in active management areas.
-
45-452
prior to→ BEFOREThis change alters the phrasing for clarity by standardizing the format used throughout the statute.
-
45-452
and J→ and KThis change adds 'K' as a new exemption category for certain land irrigation conditions.
-
45-452
prior to→ BEFOREThis standardizes the phrasing used in the law.
-
45-452
if the director finds that either of the following applies:→ ON THE DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION OF IRRIGATION GRANDFATHERED RIGHTS, A PERSON MAY IRRIGATE LAND THAT WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBJECT TO IRRIGATION IF BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY:This establishes new conditions for irrigating previously non-irrigated land in subsequent active management areas.
-
45-452
if the director finds that either of the following applies:→ ON THE DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION OF IRRIGATION GRANDFATHERED RIGHTS, A PERSON MAY IRRIGATE LAND THAT WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY SUBJECT TO IRRIGATION IF BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY:This clarifies the process for determining eligibility for irrigation rights on previously non-irrigated land.
-
45-452
not greater than ten acres.→ with groundwater, effluent, diffused water on the surface or surface water up to a total of ten acres of landThis specifies the type of water that can be used for irrigation purposes by correctional facilities.
-
45-470
NoneAdds a provision to manage groundwater withdrawal permits more effectively.
-
45-512
NoneAmends standards for managing water rights related to groundwater and surface water.
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Gail Griffin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 41 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gail Griffin Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 47% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Nay |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 32 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 32 | 27 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 45% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Nay |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Nay |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Nay |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Nay |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Not Voting |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2202?
- HB 2202 is sponsored by Gail Griffin (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2202?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2202?
- Track HB 2202 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2202
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2202
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →