SB 1374 — special census; state population; appropriation
Last action — House Second Reading
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
80 added · 102 removedPlain-language change summary
The key change in Senate Bill 1374 is that it now specifies the "office of economic opportunity" as the entity responsible for conducting a statewide special census, instead of leaving it blank for any department. Additionally, it includes an appropriation of $10 million from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2025-2026 to fund this census. This matters because designating a specific office helps clarify responsibility and ensure that the funds are used for an important demographic count, which can influence future resource allocation and policy-making.
BillSenate Number:Engrossed special census;
S.B.state population;
appropriation State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1374 FinchemAN FloorACT AmendmentAMENDING ReferenceSECTIONS to:28-6532 AND 42-5033, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
printedAPPROPRIATING billMONIES; Amendment drafted by:
LiamRELATING MaherTO FLOORSPECIAL AMENDMENTCENSUSES. EXPLANATION 1.
Appropriates(TEXT $10,000,000OF fromBILL theBEGINS stateON GeneralNEXT FundPAGE) in- FYi 2026- toS.B. the Office of Economic Opportunity, rather than an unspecified department, to conduct a statewide special census.
2.1374 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Makes a conforming change.
Amendment explanation prepared by Liam Maher 02/26/2025 Fifty-seventh Legislature Finchem First Regular Session S.B.
1374 FINCHEM FLOOR AMENDMENT SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.B.
1374 (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
Notwithstanding any other law, a city or town that is initially incorporated after the decennial census or July 1 of the fifth year after the decennial census and that has caused a special census of the population within the city or town limits to be taken by the United States Senatebureau Amendmentsof the census may cause the result of the special census to S.B.be certified to the state treasurer.
1374 bureau of the census may cause the result of the special census to be certified to the state treasurer.
Sec.- 1 - S.B.
1374 Sec.
Commencing on July 1 following the completion of such a special census, the city or town may use the results of the special census or the most recent population estimates from the United States bureau of the census as the basis of apportionment of the taxes collected under this article in determining the amount payable -2-to Senatethat Amendmentsmunicipality toas S.B.provided under section 28-6532.
1374 to that municipality as provided under section 28-6532.
The sum of $10,000,000 is appropriated from the state general fund in fiscal year 2025-2026 to the [[blank]office department][office of economic opportunity]opportunity to conduct a statewide special census pursuant to sections 28-6532 and 42-5033, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act.
Enroll- and2 engross- to conform Amend title to conform MARK FINCHEM 1374FINCHEM0325.docx 02/26/2025 03:25 PM S:
LMM/ci -3-
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current pdf
- Amended SENATE - Finchem flr amend (ref Bill) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Mark Finchem · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Mark Finchem Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 10 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 33% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Not Voting |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1374?
- SB 1374 is sponsored by Mark Finchem (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1374?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1374?
- Track SB 1374 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1374
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1374
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →