SB 1443 — parental rights; compensatory damages
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on May 02, 2025.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
133 added · 9 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Senate Bill 1443 made some updates to its title and sponsorship details. Specifically, the phrase "parental rights; compensatory damages" was kept but the introductory section listing various sponsors was removed. These changes are significant because they streamline the bill's presentation by focusing on the core issues while eliminating potentially distracting details about who introduced it. This simplification might help legislators and the public better understand the bill's intent regarding parental rights.
BillSenate Number:Engrossed parental rights;
S.B.compensatory damages State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1443 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 1-602, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
1443RELATING FernandezTO FloorPARENTAL AmendmentRIGHTS. Reference to:
printed(TEXT billOF AmendmentBILL draftedBEGINS by:ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.B.
Leg.1443 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
CouncilSection FLOOR1. AMENDMENT EXPLANATION • Strikes the requirement that compensatory damages awarded for violations of the Parents’ Bill of Rights total at least $2,500 for each violation.
AmendmentSection explanation1-602, preparedArizona byRevised PatsyStatutes, Osmonis 02/25/2025amended to read:
1-602.
Parents' bill of rights;
governmental interference restricted;
burden of proof;
definition A.
All parental rights are exclusively reserved to a parent of a minor child without obstruction or interference from this state, any political subdivision of this state, any other governmental entity or any other institution, including:
1.
The right to direct the education of the minor child.
2.
All rights of parents identified in title 15, including the right to access and review all records relating to the minor child.
3.
The right to direct the upbringing of the minor child.
4.
The right to direct the moral or religious training of the minor child.
5.
The right to make all health care decisions, INCLUDING MENTAL HEALTH CARE DECISIONS, for the minor child, including rights pursuant to sections 15-873, 36-2271 and 36-2272, unless otherwise prohibited by law.
6.
The right to request, access and review all written and electronic medical records of the minor child unless otherwise prohibited by law or unless the parent is the subject of an investigation of a crime committed against the minor child and a law enforcement official requests that the information not be released.
7.
The right to consent in writing before a biometric scan of the minor child is made pursuant to section 15-109.
8.
The right to consent in writing before any record of the minor child's blood or deoxyribonucleic acid is created, stored or shared, except as required by section 36-694, or before any genetic testing is conducted on the minor child pursuant to section 12-2803 unless authorized pursuant to section 13-610 or a court order.
9.
The right to consent in writing before this state or any of its political subdivisions makes a video or voice recording of the minor child, unless the video or voice recording is made during or as a part of a court proceeding, by law enforcement officers during or as part of a law enforcement investigation, during or as part of an interview in a criminal or child safety services investigation or to be used solely for any of the following:
(a) Safety demonstrations, including the maintenance of order and discipline in the common areas of a school or on pupil transportation vehicles.
(b) A purpose related to a legitimate academic or extracurricular activity.
(c) A purpose related to regular classroom instruction.
(d) Security or surveillance of buildings or grounds.
(e) A photo identification card.
- 1 - S.B.
1443 10.
The right to be notified promptly if an employee of this state, any political subdivision of this state, any other governmental entity or any other institution suspects that a criminal offense has been committed against the minor child by someone other than a parent, unless the incident has first been reported to law enforcement and notifying the parent would impede a law enforcement or child safety services investigation.
This paragraph does not create any new obligation for school districts and charter schools to report misconduct between students at school, such as fighting or aggressive play, that is routinely addressed as a student disciplinary matter by the school.
Show all 70 changed lines (30 more)
11.
The right to obtain information about a child safety services investigation involving the parent pursuant to section 8-807.
B.
This section does not authorize or allow a parent to engage in conduct that is unlawful or to abuse or neglect a child in violation of the laws of this state.
This section does not prohibit courts, law enforcement officers or employees of a government agency responsible for child welfare from acting in their official capacity within the scope of their authority.
This section does not prohibit a court from issuing an order that is otherwise allowed by law.
C.
Any attempt to encourage or coerce a minor child to withhold information from the child's parent is grounds for discipline of an employee of this state, any political subdivision of this state, any other governmental entity or any other institution, except for law enforcement personnel.
D.
Unless those rights have been legally waived or legally terminated, parents have inalienable rights that are more comprehensive than those listed in this section.
This chapter does not prescribe all rights of parents or preempt or foreclose claims or remedies in support of parental rights that are available under the constitution, statutes or common law of this state.
Unless otherwise required by law, the rights of parents of minor children shall not be limited or denied.
E.
Except as prescribed in subsections F and G of this section, this state, a political subdivision of this state or any other governmental entity, or any official of this state, a political subdivision of this state or any other governmental entity acting under color of law, shall not interfere with or usurp the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children.
A parent may bring suit against a governmental entity or official described in this subsection based on any violation of the statutory rights set forth in this chapter or any other action that interferes with or usurps the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children in the superior court in the county in which the violation or other action occurs or in federal court, if authorized by federal law, or before an administrative tribunal of appropriate jurisdiction.
A parent may raise a violation of this chapter as a claim or a defense.
- 2 - S.B.
1443 F.
In any action under subsection E of this section, the governmental entity or official described in subsection E of this section has the burden of proof to demonstrate both of the following:
1.
That the interference or usurpation is essential to accomplish a compelling government interest of the highest order, as long recognized in the history and traditions of this state in the operation of its regulatory powers.
2.
That the method of interference or usurpation used by the government is narrowly tailored and is not otherwise served by a less restrictive means.
G.
A governmental entity or official described in subsection E of this section may interfere with or usurp the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, health care and mental health of their children only if the governmental entity or official successfully demonstrates both elements described in subsection F of this section.
If the governmental entity or official is unsuccessful, the court shall grant appropriate relief, such as declaratory or injunctive relief, compensatory damages and attorney fees, based on the facts of the case and the law as applied to the facts.
IF THE COURT AWARDS COMPENSATORY DAMAGES PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION, THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE COMPENSATORY DAMAGES AWARD SHALL BE AT LEAST $2,500 FOR EACH VIOLATION OF THIS CHAPTER.
H.
For the purposes of this section, "parent" means the natural or adoptive parent or legal guardian of a minor child.
- 3 -
Show all 70 changed rows (30 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current pdf
- Amended SENATE - Fernandez flr amend (ref Bill) failed pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
Sponsors
- Jeff Weninger · Cosponsor
- Matt Gress · Cosponsor
- Selina Bliss · Cosponsor
- Thomas "T.J." Shope · Cosponsor
- Janae Shamp · Cosponsor
- J.D. Mesnard · Cosponsor
- John Kavanagh · Cosponsor
- David Gowan · Cosponsor
- Mark Finchem · Cosponsor
- Brian Fernandez · Cosponsor
- David C. Farnsworth · Cosponsor
- Timothy "Tim" Dunn · Cosponsor
- Frank Carroll · Cosponsor
- Shawnna Bolick · Cosponsor
- Hildy Angius · Cosponsor
- Carine Werner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 77 not signed on · 33 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Carine Werner Republican
Co-sponsors (15)
- Jeff Weninger Republican
- Matt Gress Republican
- Selina Bliss Republican
- Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican
- Janae Shamp Republican
- J.D. Mesnard Republican
- John Kavanagh Republican
- David Gowan Republican
- Mark Finchem Republican
- Brian Fernandez Democrat Voted No
- David C. Farnsworth Republican
- Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican
- Frank Carroll Republican
- Shawnna Bolick Republican
- Hildy Angius Republican
Not signed on (77)
77 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 77 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 1 | 23 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 32 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 23 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 38% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Nay |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Nay |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Nay |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Not Voting |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 37% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1443?
- SB 1443 is sponsored by Jeff Weninger (Republican), Matt Gress (Republican), Selina Bliss (Republican), Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican), Janae Shamp (Republican), J.D. Mesnard (Republican), John Kavanagh (Republican), David Gowan (Republican), Mark Finchem (Republican), Brian Fernandez (Democrat), David C. Farnsworth (Republican), Timothy "Tim" Dunn (Republican), Frank Carroll (Republican), Shawnna Bolick (Republican), Hildy Angius (Republican), and Carine Werner (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1443?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1443?
- Track SB 1443 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1443
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1443
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →