Arizona 57th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 R cosponsors

SB 1543 — homestead exemption; equity increase

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on April 18, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 56% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    3 passed, 4 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

180 added · 72 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to SB 1543 introduce a new provision allowing municipalities in Arizona with populations between 200,000 and 500,000 to permit hotel and multifamily residential housing use as ancillary options in specific light industrial zoning areas without needing a public hearing, provided certain conditions are met. This change is significant because it aims to promote economic growth by streamlining the approval process for developments that could create jobs and increase local housing options, especially when linked to the establishment of large international headquarters that will employ a substantial number of people.

→
Previous
Latest
Senate Engrossed homestead exemption;
House Engrossed Senate Bill homestead exemption;
equity increase State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1543 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 33-1101, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, AS AMENDED BY PROPOSITION 209, ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 8, 2022;
equity increase (now:
REPEALING SECTION 33-1101, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, AS AMENDED BY LAWS 2021, CHAPTER 368, SECTION 3;
ancillary use;
RELATING TO HOMESTEAD AND PERSONAL PROPERTY EXEMPTIONS.
international headquarters campus) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER 74 SENATE BILL 1543 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 6, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 9-461.19;
RELATING TO MUNICIPAL PLANNING.
Section 33-1101, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by proposition 209, election of November 8, 2022, is amended to read:
Title 9, chapter 4, article 6, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 9-461.19, to read:
33-1101.
9-461.19.
Homestead exemptions;
Municipal allowed ancillary use;
persons entitled to hold homesteads;
multifamily residential housing;
annual adjustment A.
hotel use;
Any person the age of WHO IS AT LEAST eighteen or over YEARS OF AGE, married or single, AND who resides within the THIS state may hold as a homestead exempt from attachment, execution and forced sale, not exceeding $400,000 in value, any one of the following:
regulations;
applicability;
definitions A.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, A MUNICIPALITY WITH A POPULATION OF TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND OR MORE PERSONS BUT NOT MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND PERSONS SHALL ALLOW HOTEL USE AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING AS AN ALLOWED ANCILLARY USE ON LAND THAT IS VACANT AS OF THE DATE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE ALLOWED ANCILLARY USE IN A ZONING DISTRICT THAT ALLOWS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE WITHOUT REQUIRING ANY TYPE OF APPLICATION THAT WILL REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING IF THE ANCILLARY USE MEETS BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:
The person's interest in real property in one compact body upon ON which exists a dwelling house in which the person resides.
THE ANCILLARY USE IS LOCATED WITHIN AN INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS THAT IS SOLELY OWNED BY EITHER A SINGLE ENTITY OR RELATED ENTITIES AT THE TIME THAT DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS COMMENCES AND, ON COMPLETION, THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS ON THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS WILL EMPLOY MORE THAN ONE THOUSAND FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES AT AN AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPENSATION OF MORE THAN ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT OF THE MEDIAN WAGE OF THE COUNTY WHERE THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS IS LOCATED.
The person's interest in one condominium or cooperative in which the person resides.
THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS THAT CONTAINS THE ANCILLARY USE IS BOUND BY A RECORDED INSTRUMENT THAT IS ENFORCEABLE BY THE MUNICIPALITY AND THAT DOES BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING:
3.
(a) RESTRICTS OCCUPANCY IN AT LEAST THIRTY PERCENT OF THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNITS LOCATED ON THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE UNITS DESIGNATED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION I OF THIS SECTION AT THE DISCRETION OF THE DEVELOPER, TO INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE EMPLOYED AT THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS, OR WHO ARE POLICE OFFICERS, FIREFIGHTERS, TEACHERS, VETERANS OR HEALTH CARE WORKERS AND WHO WORK WITHIN FIVE MILES OF THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS OR WHO ARE THE FAMILIES OF INDIVIDUALS EMPLOYED AT THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS.
A mobile home in which the person resides.
THE RECORDED INSTRUMENT MUST ALSO PROVIDE THAT THE MUNICIPALITY WHERE THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS IS LOCATED, IN THE MUNICIPALITY'S SOLE AND ABSOLUTE DISCRETION, MAY WAIVE THE OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENT.
4.
(b) PROHIBITS AN AGREEMENT FOR OCCUPANCY OF ANY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNIT WITHIN THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS FOR A PERIOD OF LESS THAN NINETY CONSECUTIVE DAYS AND LIMITS OCCUPANCY TO THE SAME OCCUPANTS FOR THE ENTIRETY OF THE NINETY CONSECUTIVE DAYS UNLESS A TENANT OF THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNIT IS AN EMPLOYEE OR CONTRACTOR OF AN ENTITY LOCATED WITHIN THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS AND THAT EMPLOYEE OR CONTRACTOR PERFORMS JOB DUTIES AT THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS.
A mobile home in which the person resides plus the land upon ON which that mobile home is located.
THIS SUBDIVISION DOES NOT APPLY TO MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE PLATTED FOR INDIVIDUAL OWNERSHIP OF UNITS.
B.
- 1 - S.B.
Only one homestead exemption may be held by a married couple or a single person under this section.
1543 B.
The value as specified in this section refers to the equity of a single person or married couple.
AN ANCILLARY USE IS SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH GENERALLY APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL BUILDING CODES AND FIRE CODES AND THE OBJECTIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION E OF THIS SECTION.
If a married couple lived together in a dwelling house, a condominium or cooperative, a mobile home or a mobile home plus land on which the mobile home is located and are then divorced, the total exemption THAT IS allowed for that residence to either or both persons shall not exceed $400,000 in value.
The homestead exemption, not exceeding the value provided for in subsection A OF THIS SECTION, as adjusted by subsection D of this section, automatically attaches to the person's interest in identifiable cash proceeds from the voluntary or involuntary sale of the property.
THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE MUNICIPALITY MAY NOT UNREASONABLY WITHHOLD A BUILDING PERMIT OR UNREASONABLY DELAY A BUILDING INSPECTION OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR AN ANCILLARY USE THAT COMPLIES WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:
The homestead exemption in identifiable cash proceeds continues for eighteen months after the date of the sale of the property or until the person establishes a new homestead with the proceeds, whichever period is shorter.
1.
THE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION DOES NOT ATTACH TO THE PERSON'S INTEREST IN IDENTIFIABLE CASH PROCEEDS FROM REFINANCING THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY.
FOR INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUSES THAT INCLUDE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNITS AS AN ANCILLARY USE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, A MUNICIPALITY SHALL ALLOW A NUMBER OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS THAT ARE EQUAL TO TWENTY-SEVEN UNITS PER GROSS ACRE BASED ON THE TOTAL GROSS ACREAGE OF THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS.
Only one homestead exemption at a time may be held by a person under this section.
2.
FOR CAMPUSES THAT INCLUDE HOTEL USE AS AN ANCILLARY USE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, A MUNICIPALITY SHALL ALLOW A NUMBER OF HOTEL ROOMS WITHIN THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS EQUAL TO TEN HOTEL ROOMS PER GROSS ACRE BASED ON THE TOTAL GROSS ACREAGE OF THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS.
AT LEAST TEN PERCENT OF THE HOTEL ROOMS WITHIN THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS FOR-SALE RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN THE HOTEL.
The homestead exemption provided by this section shall be adjusted annually beginning on January 1, 2024 and thereafter on January 1 of each successive year by the increase in the cost of living.
FOR CAMPUSES THAT INCLUDE HOTEL USE OR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNITS AS AN ANCILLARY USE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, A MUNICIPALITY SHALL ALLOW COMPLEMENTARY RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USE WITHIN THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS.
The increase in the cost of living shall be measured by the percentage increase as of August of the immediately preceding year over the level as of August of the previous year of the consumer price index (all urban consumers, United States city average for all items) or its successor index as published by the United States department of labor, bureau of labor statistics, or its successor agency, with the amount of the exemption rounded up to the nearest $100.
E.
- 1 - S.B.
THE FOLLOWING OBJECTIVE STANDARDS APPLY TO AN ANCILLARY USE BUILDING DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION:
1543 E.
1.
FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF EQUITY IN A HOMESTEAD PROPERTY THAT IS SOLD OR FOR DETERMINING WHETHER THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RECEIVING CASH BACK FROM REFINANCING THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY, THE PARTIES MAY RELY ON THE VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY IN THE FINAL CLOSING DOCUMENT DISCLOSURE THAT IS USED FOR THAT TRANSACTION.
A MUNICIPALITY MAY LIMIT THE HEIGHT OF THE ANCILLARY USE BUILDING TO TWO STORIES IN AN INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS SITE THAT IS LOCATED DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO AND WITHIN ONE HUNDRED FEET OF AN AREA THAT IS ZONED FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE.
2.
EXCEPT PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SUBSECTION, A MUNICIPALITY MAY NOT RESTRICT THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE ANCILLARY USE BUILDING TO LESS THAN SIX STORIES, NOT INCLUDING MECHANICAL SCREENING OR ROOFTOP APPURTENANCES.
3.
ANY UTILITY PROVIDER THAT MAY PROVIDE UTILITY SERVICE TO THE ANCILLARY USE DEVELOPMENT MAY REVIEW CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS TO REASONABLY ENSURE ADEQUATE WATER AND SEWER CAPACITY IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED ANCILLARY USE DEVELOPMENT.
4.
Show all 85 changed rows (45 more)
Previous
Latest
EXISTING MUNICIPAL ZONING ORDINANCES FOR SETBACK AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED ANCILLARY USE DEVELOPMENT APPLY.
FOR ANY CASE FILED UNDER UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 11, THE AMOUNT OF THE DEBTOR'S HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION INITIALLY SHALL BE DETERMINED AS OF THE DATE THE BANKRUPTCY PETITION IS FILED.
A BUILDING PERMIT FOR AN ANCILLARY USE BUILDING DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION MAY NOT BE OBTAINED UNTIL THE MUNICIPALITY ISSUES A BUILDING PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS BUILDING.
IF THE VALUE IN THE HOMESTEAD IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT PRESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION AT THE TIME OF FILING, INCLUDING ANY INCREASE PRESCRIBED BY SUBSECTION D OF THIS SECTION, THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT EXEMPT AND ANY INCREASE IN THE VALUE OF THE HOMESTEAD DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE BANKRUPTCY CASE IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT EXEMPT WITHOUT REGARD TO WHETHER THE DEBTOR'S INTEREST INCREASES ABOVE THE AMOUNT PRESCRIBED BY SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION, INCLUDING ANY INCREASE PRESCRIBED BY SUBSECTION D OF THIS SECTION.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE GRANTED FOR AN ANCILLARY USE BUILDING DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION BEFORE THE MUNICIPALITY GRANTS A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS BUILDING.
- 2 - S.B.
1543 G.
NOTWITHSTANDING SUBSECTION F OF THIS SECTION, IF SUBSTANTIAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS BUILDING HAS COMMENCED, A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY SHALL BE GRANTED FOR AN ANCILLARY USE BUILDING DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION BEFORE THE MUNICIPALITY GRANTS A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS BUILDING IF THE STATE LAND DEPARTMENT HAS RECEIVED A BOND, A LETTER OF CREDIT OR ANY OTHER SUFFICIENT FINANCIAL ASSURANCE THAT, IN THE REASONABLE DISCRETION OF THE STATE LAND COMMISSIONER, PROVIDES FOR PAYMENT TO THE STATE LAND TRUST OF AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE MARKET SALE VALUE OF THE LAND AND IMPROVEMENTS CONTAINING THE ANCILLARY USE DEVELOPMENT, LESS DEVELOPMENT COSTS, IF THE MUNICIPALITY DOES NOT GRANT A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS BUILDING WITHIN FIVE YEARS AFTER GRANTING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE ANCILLARY USE BUILDING.
H.
A MUNICIPALITY SHALL CONSENT TO AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS TO WHICH THE MUNICIPALITY IS A SIGNATORY THAT ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF HOTEL USE OR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE AS AN ANCILLARY USE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
I.
FOR TEN YEARS AFTER THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ALLOWED ANCILLARY USE DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, THE DEVELOPER SHALL DESIGNATE AT LEAST FIVE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL FOR-RENT MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS AS AFFORDABLE UNITS.
AT THE DEVELOPER'S DISCRETION, THE UNITS SHALL BE RESTRICTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION A, PARAGRAPH 2, SUBDIVISION (a) OF THIS SECTION AS LOW-INCOME HOUSING OR MIDDLE-INCOME HOUSING, OR A MIXTURE OF BOTH LOW-INCOME HOUSING AND MIDDLE-INCOME HOUSING AND MAY BE CONTAINED WITHIN ONE BUILDING OR WITHIN MULTIPLE BUILDINGS.
J.
THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO LAND IN THE TERRITORY IN THE VICINITY OF A MILITARY AIRPORT OR ANCILLARY MILITARY FACILITY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 28-8461.
K.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
1.
"BUILDING CODE" HAS THE SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 9-1301.
2.
"INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS" MEANS A PRINCIPAL CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE WHERE PRIMARY HEADQUARTERS-RELATED FUNCTIONS AND SERVICES ARE PERFORMED, INCLUDING FINANCIAL, PERSONNEL, ADMINISTRATIVE, LEGAL, HUMAN RESOURCES, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, PLANNING AND SIMILAR BUSINESS FUNCTIONS, AND THAT DOES NOT REPORT TO ANY PARENT COMPANY OUTSIDE OF THIS STATE.
3.
"INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS BUILDING" MEANS THE PRIMARY BUILDING THAT CONTAINS THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS ON THE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS.
4.
"INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS CAMPUS" MEANS A CONTIGUOUS AREA OF NOT LESS THAN FORTY GROSS ACRES, PORTIONS OF WHICH MAY BE SEPARATED BY PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, ON WHICH AN INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS IS LOCATED AND WHICH MAY INCLUDE ANCILLARY USE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
5.
"LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE" INCLUDES LIGHT MANUFACTURING, SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTION, LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT, MILITARY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND AERONAUTICAL USE.
- 3 - S.B.
1543 6.
"LOW-INCOME HOUSING" MEANS HOUSING THAT IS FOR A PERSON OR PERSONS WHOSE HOUSEHOLD INCOME DOES NOT EXCEED EIGHTY PERCENT OF THE AREA MEDIAN INCOME.
7.
"MIDDLE-INCOME HOUSING" MEANS HOUSING THAT IS FOR A PERSON OR PERSONS WHOSE HOUSEHOLD INCOME DOES NOT EXCEED ONE HUNDRED TWENTY PERCENT OF THE AREA MEDIAN INCOME.
8.
"RELATED ENTITIES" MEANS ENTITIES THAT HAVE MORE THAN FIFTY PERCENT DIRECT OR INDIRECT COMMON OWNERSHIP.
9.
"ZONING DISTRICT" MEANS A ZONING DISTRICT, PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT, PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT OR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.
Repeal Section 33-1101, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by Laws 2021, chapter 368, section 3, is repealed.
Severability If a provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of the act that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are severable.
Applicability Section 33-1101, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by section 1 of this act, applies to any petition for bankruptcy proceedings that is filed after the effective date of this act.
Legislative findings The legislature finds:
- 2 -
1.
That it is in the significant and legitimate public interest of this state to encourage the location or relocation of corporate headquarters to this state.
2.
That the development of corporate international headquarters campuses as defined in section 9-461.19, Arizona Revised Statutes, as added by this act, that include primary commercial uses as well as ancillary residential uses contribute greatly to the economic prosperity and health of this state.
3.
That it is necessary to adopt a uniform law governing international headquarters campuses as defined in section 9-461.19, Arizona Revised Statutes, as added by this act, to encourage the development of corporate international headquarters campuses throughout this state.
APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR APRIL 18, 2025.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE APRIL 21, 2025.
- 4 -
View plain text versions (8)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. PASSED

  4. PASSED

  5. Transmit to Senate

  6. PASSED

  7. FAILED

  8. DPA

  9. DPA/SE

  10. W/D

  11. House Second Reading

  12. House First Reading.

  13. Transmit to House

  14. PASSED

  15. DPA

  16. Senate Second Reading

  17. Senate First Reading

  18. DP

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 55 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 40 Yea · 19 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 22401
Republican 181500
Total 401901
% of votes cast 67%32%0%2%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Yea
Alma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Anna Abeytia Democrat Yea
Betty J Villegas Democrat Yea
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Not Voting
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Yea
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Yea
Janeen Connolly Democrat Yea
Junelle Cavero Democrat Yea
Kevin Volk Democrat Yea
Lorena Austin Democrat Yea
Lupe Contreras Democrat Yea
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Yea
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Yea
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Yea
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Yea
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Yea
Patty Contreras Democrat Yea
Quantá Crews Democrat Yea
Sarah Liguori Democrat Yea
Seth Blattman Democrat Yea
Stacey Travers Democrat Yea
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Yea
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Nay
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Nay
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Nay
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Nay
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Nay
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Nay
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Nay
Lisa Fink Republican Nay
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Nay
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Nay
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Nay
Nick Kupper Republican Nay
Pamela Carter Republican Nay
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Nay
Ralph Heap Republican Nay
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

failed to pass

Failed 16 Yea · 39 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 41904
Republican 122001
Total 163905
% of votes cast 27%65%0%8%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Anna Abeytia Democrat Yea
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Yea
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Not Voting
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Nay
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Not Voting
Kevin Volk Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Not Voting
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Not Voting
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Nay
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Nay
Stacey Travers Democrat Yea
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Yea
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Nay
David Livingston Republican Nay
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Nay
James Taylor Republican Nay
Jeff Weninger Republican Nay
John Gillette Republican Nay
Joseph Chaplik Republican Yea
Julie Willoughby Republican Nay
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Nay
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Nay
Leo Biasiucci Republican Nay
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Nay
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Nay
Michael Way Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Nay
Neal Carter Republican Nay
Nick Kupper Republican Not Voting
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Nay
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Nay
Steve Montenegro Republican Nay
Teresa Martinez Republican Nay
Tony Rivero Republican Nay
Walt Blackman Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 28 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 11002
Republican 17000
Total 28002
% of votes cast 93%0%0%7%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Yea
Catherine Miranda Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Yea
Eva Burch Democrat Not Voting
Eva Diaz Democrat Yea
Flavio Bravo Democrat Yea
Lauren Kuby Democrat Yea
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Yea
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Yea
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Yea
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Not Voting
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1543?
SB 1543 is sponsored by Frank Carroll (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1543?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1543?
Track SB 1543 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1543

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1543

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →