HB 2201 — technical correction; electricity; power authority
Last action — Signed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 23, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on May 12, 2025.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
5 passed, 4 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
328 added · 268 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of the bill HB 2201 removes the definition of "Public Safety Power Shut Off," which described a method for reducing wildfire risks by temporarily cutting power. The definition of "wildfire" and "wildfire mitigation plan" remains unchanged, but the section now clarifies that the chapter does not create new legal claims or responsibilities beyond existing laws. This change is significant because it streamlines the bill and focuses on wildfire prevention efforts without introducing new legal complexities.
HouseSenate Engrossed House Bill technical correction;
approval) State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER 167 HOUSE BILL 2201 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 30, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING CHAPTER 7;
AMENDING TITLE 37, CHAPTER 9, ARTICLE 1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 37-1311;
"PUBLIC SAFETY POWER SHUT OFF" MEANS THE INTENTIONAL TEMPORARY SHUT OFF OF POWER DURING CERTAIN WEATHER OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS TO REDUCE THE RISK OF WILDFIRES.
6.
7.6.
IN ANY CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST A PUBLIC POWER ENTITY THAT IS RELATED TO A WILDFIRE, AN ATTACHOR SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE A PUBLIC POWER ENTITY AND TO BE COVERED BY THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTION 30-904 WITH RESPECT TO ANY LIABILITY THAT MAY BE ALLEGED TO HAVE ARISEN OUT OF THE ATTACHOR'S EQUIPMENT.
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION E OF THIS SECTION, A PUBLIC POWER ENTITY SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN TO THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S GOVERNING BODY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
THE PUBLICGOVERNING POWERBODY ENTITY SHALL SUBMITADOPT THEA WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN TO THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S GOVERNING BODY ON OR BEFORE MAY 1, 2026 AND EVERY EVEN-NUMBERED YEAR THEREAFTER UNLESS THE GOVERNING BODY ORDERS OTHERWISE.
BEFORE A PUBLIC POWER ENTITY SUBMITS A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN TO THE GOVERNING BODY, THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY SHALL CONSULT WITH A STATE OR FEDERAL LAND MANAGEMENT OR FIRE PROTECTION AGENCY THAT HAS AUTHORITY IN THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S SERVICE TERRITORY, AS APPLICABLE, AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
THE GOVERNING BODY SHALL REVIEW THE SUBMITTED WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN TO ENSURE THAT THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN:
THE GOVERNINGWILDFIRE BODYMITIGATION MAYPLAN REQUESTIS ADDITIONALDEEMED INFORMATIONAPPROVED ORBY ATHE MODIFICATIONGOVERNING TOBODY DURING THE SUBMITTEDPENDENCY WILDFIREOF MITIGATIONANY PLANJUDICIAL WITHINACTION ONETHAT HUNDREDSEEKS TWENTYREVIEW DAYSOF AFTERTHE RECEIPTGOVERNING BODY'S APPROVAL OR REJECTION OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN BYOR PROVIDINGANY WRITTENPORTION NOTICEOF TO THE PUBLICWILDFIRE POWERMITIGATION ENTITY.PLAN.
IF THE GOVERNING BODY DOES NOT REQUEST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR A MODIFICATION TO THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN, THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IS DEEMED ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED AT THE EXPIRATION OF ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DAYS.
WITHINEXCEPT NINETYAS DAYSPROVIDED AFTER RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE PRESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION CE OF THIS SECTION, THEA PUBLIC POWER ENTITY SHALL REVISESUBMIT THE PUBLICAPPROVED POWER ENTITY'S WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN TO ADDRESS THE GOVERNINGSTATE BODY'SFORESTER REQUEST.FOR FURTHER REVIEW AND APPROVAL AS PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 37-1311.
THE GOVERNING BODY HAS SIXTY DAYS TO CONSIDER THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S RESPONSE AND ANY PROPOSED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR MODIFICATION TO THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IS DEEMED APPROVED DURING THE PENDENCY OF ANY JUDICIAL ACTION THAT SEEKS REVIEW OF THE GOVERNING BODY'S APPROVAL OR REJECTION OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN OR ANY PORTION OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
IF THE - 2 - H.B.
2201 GOVERNING BODY DOES NOT REQUEST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR A MODIFICATION TO THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN, THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IS DEEMED ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED AT THE EXPIRATION OF SIXTY DAYS.
THEA PUBLIC POWER ENTITY WITH FEWER THAN FORTY THOUSAND METERS IN THIS STATE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2025 MAY PREPARE AND SUBMIT A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN SHALLFOR INCLUDEREVIEW AND APPROVAL TO BOTH THE FOLLOWING:PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S GOVERNING BODY AND THE STATE FORESTER AS PRESCRIBED IN SUBSECTIONS A AND D OF THIS SECTION.
1.IF THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY WITH FEWER THAN FORTY THOUSAND METERS IN THIS STATE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2025 DOES NOT SUBMIT A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL TO BOTH THE GOVERNING BODY PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND THE STATE FORESTER PURSUANT TO SECTION 37-1311, THIS CHAPTER DOES NOT APPLY TO THAT PUBLIC POWER ENTITY.
A DESCRIPTION OF AREAS WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC REGION WHERE THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S FACILITIES MAY BE SUBJECT TO A HEIGHTENED RISK OF WILDFIRE.
2.
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS THAT THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY WILL USE TO INSPECT AND OPERATE THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S INFRASTRUCTURE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF WILDFIRES.
3.
A DESCRIPTION OF THE KEY INDIVIDUALS OR POSITION TITLES OF THOSE PERSONS WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
4.
A DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR DEENERGIZING POWER LINES AND DISABLING RECLOSERS TO MITIGATE POTENTIAL WILDFIRES OR PROVIDE A PUBLIC SAFETY POWER SHUT OFF PLAN.
5.
A PLAN FOR VEGETATION MANAGEMENT.
6.
A SUMMARY OF THE PROCEDURES THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY INTENDS TO USE TO RESTORE THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IN THE EVENT OF A WILDFIRE.
7.
A DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PUBLIC AWARENESS EFFORTS.
8.
A DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL PARTICIPATION, IF APPLICABLE, WITH STATE OR LOCAL WILDFIRE PROTECTION EFFORTS.
9.
A DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY WILL MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
F.
A PUBLIC POWER ENTITY MAY REFERENCE PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS THAT ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED IN THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IN LIEU OF THE REQUIREMENTS UNDER SUBSECTION E OF THIS SECTION.
REFERENCED MATERIAL MUST BE INCLUDED AS ATTACHMENTS TO THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN SUBMISSION.
Show all 214 changed lines (174 more)
FOR ANY CAUSE OF ACTION FOR NEGLIGENCE AGAINST A PUBLIC POWER ENTITY THAT IS RELATED TO A WILDFIRE, ALLA OFPUBLIC THEPOWER ELEMENTSENTITY MUSTTHAT BEACTS PROVENIN BY- CLEAR2 AND- CONVINCINGH.B. EVIDENCE.
2201 COMPLIANCE WITH A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN THAT IS APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 30-903 AND 37-1311 IS DEEMED TO MEET THE STANDARD OF CARE FOR A REASONABLY PRUDENT PUBLIC POWER ENTITY.
A PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CAUSE OF ACTION SHALL PROVE THAT A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN WAS A PROXIMATE CAUSE OF ANY LOSS, INJURY OR OTHER HARM ALLEGED.
NOTWITHSTANDING SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION, A PUBLIC POWER ENTITY THAT SUBSTANTIALLYENGAGES ACTS IN COMPLIANCEWILFUL, WITHINTENTIONAL THEOR APPROVEDRECKLESS WILDFIREMISCONDUCT MITIGATIONTHAT PLANCAUSES A WILDFIRE IS DEEMED TO NOT MEET THE STANDARD OF CARE FOR A REASONABLY PRUDENT PUBLIC POWER ENTITYENTITY. UNLESS THERE IS CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE OF WILFUL, INTENTIONAL OR RECKLESS MISCONDUCT.
-C. 3 - H.B.
2201A C.PUBLIC POWER ENTITY SHALL NOT BE APPORTIONED ANY PROPORTION OF FAULT FOR THE IGNITION OF A WILDFIRE FROM SOURCES THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S CONTROL, INCLUDING LIGHTNING STRIKES OR ACTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES.
A PUBLIC POWER ENTITY SHALL NOT BE APPORTIONED ANY FAULT FOR THE IGNITION OF A WILDFIRE FROM SOURCES THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S CONTROL, INCLUDING LIGHTNING STRIKES OR ACTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES.
A PUBLIC POWER ENTITY SHALL NOT BE APPORTIONED ANY PROPORTION OF FAULT FOR VEGETATION OR OTHER WILDFIRE RISKS OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY, LEASE OR OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS OR AREAS IN WHICH THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY HAS BEEN DELAYED IN ACCESSING OR DENIED ACCESS TO FOR PURPOSES OF PERFORMING VEGETATION MANAGEMENT.MANAGEMENT IF THE DELAY OR DENIAL IS OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S REASONABLE CONTROL.
IN AN ACTION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION TO RECOVER ANY DAMAGES THAT RESULT FROM A WILDFIRE, NEITHER CONSEQUENTIAL PROPERTY DAMAGES NOR EXEMPLARY OR PUNITIVE BODILY INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGES SHALL BE RECOVERED.
G.
Title 37, chapter 9, article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 37-1311, to read:
37-1311.
Wildfire mitigation plan;
hearing;
rules;
fees;
definitions A.
THE STATE FORESTER SHALL REVIEW AND APPROVE A SUBMITTED WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IF THE STATE FORESTER FINDS THAT THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN:
1.
COMPLIES WITH TITLE 30, CHAPTER 7, ARTICLE 1 OR TITLE 40, CHAPTER 8, ARTICLE 1 AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE RULES.
2.
IS REASONABLE CONSIDERING THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S OR ELECTRIC UTILITY'S SIZE AND RESOURCES.
3.
IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.
4.
MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION H OF THIS SECTION.
- 3 - H.B.
2201 5.
IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND RISK OF THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S OR ELECTRIC UTILITY'S SERVICE AREA IN WHICH THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR THE ELECTRIC UTILITY OPERATES.
B.
THE STATE FORESTER SHALL PROVIDE PUBLIC NOTICE AND AN OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON A SUBMITTED WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
THE STATE FORESTER SHALL PUBLISH THE NOTICE ON THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE MANAGEMENT'S WEBSITE AND IN THE ARIZONA ADMINISTRATIVE REGISTER.
C.
WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS AFTER RECEIVING A SUBMITTED WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN, THE STATE FORESTER SHALL:
1.
IDENTIFY THE COUNTIES AND CITIES AND TOWNS THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC REGION AS DESCRIBED IN THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S OR ELECTRIC UTILITY'S WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
2.
ESTABLISH THE TIME PERIOD AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE AFFECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES AND TOWNS TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT.
3.
PROVIDE THE INFORMATION PRESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPHS 1 AND 2 OF THIS SUBSECTION TO THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY.
D.
WITHIN TEN DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE INFORMATION PRESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION C OF THIS SECTION, THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE IDENTIFIED COUNTIES AND CITIES AND TOWNS OF THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE COMMENT ON THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
E.
WITHIN FORTY-FIVE DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF ANY WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN, THE STATE FORESTER SHALL HOLD A PUBLIC MEETING TO SOLICIT COMMENTS ON ANY PROPOSED WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
THE STATE FORESTER SHALL PROVIDE FOR REMOTE ATTENDANCE AT THE PUBLIC MEETING USING TELEPHONIC OR VIDEO CONFERENCING.
F.
THE STATE FORESTER MAY REQUEST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR REQUEST MODIFICATION TO THE SUBMITTED WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN WITHIN ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DAYS AFTER THE INITIAL RECEIPT OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN BY PROVIDING WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY.
IF THE STATE FORESTER DOES NOT REQUEST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR A MODIFICATION TO THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN, THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IS DEEMED ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED AFTER THE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-DAY REVIEW PERIOD.
G.
WITHIN NINETY DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE PRESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION F OF THIS SECTION, THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY SHALL RESPOND TO THE STATE FORESTER'S REQUEST FOR INFORMATION AND, IF NECESSARY, MAY REVISE THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
THE STATE FORESTER SHALL HAVE SIXTY DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE RESPONSES OR A REVISED WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN, WHICHEVER IS LATER, TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
IF THE STATE FORESTER DOES NOT REQUEST FURTHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR A MODIFICATION TO THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN, THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IS DEEMED ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED AT THE EXPIRATION OF SIXTY DAYS.
THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IS - 4 - H.B.
2201 DEEMED APPROVED DURING THE PENDENCY OF ANY JUDICIAL ACTION PURSUANT TO TITLE 12, CHAPTER 7, ARTICLE 6 THAT SEEKS REVIEW OF THE STATE FORESTER'S APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN OR ANY PORTION OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
H.
THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN SHALL DO THE FOLLOWING:
1.
IDENTIFY PREVENTIVE ACTIONS, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AND MONITORING PROGRAMS THAT THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY WILL CARRY OUT, INSTALL, REPAIR, REPLACE OR IMPLEMENT TO MINIMIZE THE RISK OF A WILDFIRE.
2.
INCLUDE:
(a) A DESCRIPTION OF AREAS WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC REGION WHERE THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S OR ELECTRIC UTILITY'S FACILITIES MAY BE SUBJECT TO A HEIGHTENED RISK OF WILDFIRE.
(b) A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURES, STANDARDS AND TIME FRAMES THAT THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY WILL USE TO INSPECT AND OPERATE THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S OR ELECTRIC UTILITY'S INFRASTRUCTURE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF WILDFIRES.
(c) A DESCRIPTION OF THE KEY INDIVIDUALS OR POSITION TITLES OF THOSE PERSONS WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
(d) A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURES FOR DEENERGIZING POWER LINES AND DISABLING RECLOSERS TO MITIGATE POTENTIAL WILDFIRES OR PROVIDE A PUBLIC SAFETY POWER SHUT OFF PLAN.
(e) A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURES, STANDARDS AND TIME FRAMES THAT THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY WILL USE TO CARRY OUT VEGETATION MANAGEMENT.
(f) A SUMMARY OF THE PROCEDURES THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY INTENDS TO USE TO RESTORE THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY'S OR ELECTRIC UTILITY'S ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IN THE EVENT OF A WILDFIRE.
(g) A DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PUBLIC AWARENESS EFFORTS.
(h) A DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL PARTICIPATION, IF APPLICABLE, WITH STATE OR LOCAL WILDFIRE PROTECTION EFFORTS.
(i) A DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY WILL MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
I.
A PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY MAY REFERENCE PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS THAT ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED IN THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IN LIEU OF THE REQUIREMENTS PRESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION H OF THIS SECTION.
REFERENCED MATERIAL SHALL BE INCLUDED AS ATTACHMENTS TO THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN SUBMISSION.
J.
DURING THE PENDENCY OF ANY REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS BY THE STATE FORESTER PRESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION, ANY WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE STATE FORESTER SHALL REMAIN APPROVED AND IN EFFECT.
K.
THE STATE FORESTER MAY ADOPT RULES TO IMPLEMENT THIS SECTION.
- 5 - H.B.
2201 L.
ANY ACTION BY THE STATE FORESTER PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION AND ANY COMMENTS ON THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN PROVIDED BY ANY COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION ARE THE EXERCISE OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTION INVOLVING THE DETERMINATION OF FUNDAMENTAL GOVERNMENTAL POLICY AS PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 12-820.01.
M.
THE STATE FORESTER MAY CHARGE REASONABLE FEES TO PUBLIC POWER ENTITIES AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES FOR THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLANS AS PRESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION.
IN ESTABLISHING THE FEES, THE STATE FORESTER MAY CONSIDER FACTORS SUCH AS THE TIME AND MATERIALS NECESSARY TO REVIEW THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLANS WITH CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO THE RELATIVE SIZE, RESOURCES AND SERVICE TERRITORY COMPLEXITY OF THE PUBLIC POWER ENTITY OR ELECTRIC UTILITY SUBMITTING A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
N.
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
1.
"ELECTRIC UTILITY" HAS THE SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED IN SECTIONS 30-901 AND 40-1301.
2.
"PUBLIC POWER ENTITY" HAS THE SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED IN SECTIONS 30-901 AND 40-1301.
3.
"PUBLIC SAFETY POWER SHUT OFF" MEANS THE INTENTIONAL TEMPORARY SHUT OFF OF POWER DURING CERTAIN WEATHER OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS TO REDUCE THE RISK OF WILDFIRE.
4.
"WILDFIRE" HAS THE SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED IN SECTIONS 30-901 AND 40-1301.
5.
"WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN" HAS THE SAME MEANING PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 30-901 OR 40-1301.
Sec.
3.
"COMMISSION" MEANS THE CORPORATION COMMISSION.
3.
"ELECTED BOARD" MEANS THE GOVERNING BODY OF AN ELECTRIC UTILITY THAT IS SELECTED BY VOTERS OR MEMBERS OF AN ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE IN AN ELECTION.
4.
(ii)- ANY6 GENERATION- ANDH.B. TRANSMISSION COOPERATIVE OPERATING IN THIS STATE.
2201 (ii) ANY GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION COOPERATIVE OPERATING IN THIS STATE.
-3. 4 - H.B.
2201 5.
6.4.
"PUBLIC SAFETY POWER SHUT OFF" MEANS THE INTENTIONAL TEMPORARY SHUT OFF OF POWER DURING CERTAIN WEATHER OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS TO REDUCE THE RISK OF WILDFIRES.
7.
8.5.
"WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN" MEANS A PLAN THAT IS SUBMITTED TO THE COMMISSIONSTATE ORFORESTER ELECTED BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER.CHAPTER AND SECTION 37-1311.
IN ANY CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST AN ELECTRIC UTILITY THAT IS RELATED TO A WILDFIRE, ANY ATTACHOR SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE AN ELECTRIC UTILITY AND TO BE COVERED BY THE ELECTRIC UTILITY'S WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN FOR THE PURPOSES OF SECTION 40-1304 WITH RESPECT TO ANY LIABILITY THAT MAY BE ALLEGED TO HAVE ARISEN OUT OF THE ATTACHOR'S EQUIPMENT.
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION GC OF THIS SECTION, AN ELECTRIC UTILITY SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN TO THE COMMISSIONSTATE FORESTER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.APPROVAL AS PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 37-1311.
THE ELECTRIC UTILITY SHALL SUBMIT THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN TO THE COMMISSIONSTATE FORESTER ON OR BEFORE MAY 1, 2026 AND EVERY EVEN-NUMBERED YEAR THEREAFTER.
BEFOREB. AN ELECTRIC UTILITY SUBMITS A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN TO THE COMMISSION, THE ELECTRIC UTILITY SHALL CONSULT WITH A STATE OR FEDERAL LAND MANAGEMENT OR FIRE PROTECTION AGENCY THAT HAS AUTHORITY IN THE ELECTRIC UTILITY'S SERVICE TERRITORY, AS APPLICABLE, AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
ANY ACTION BY THE STATE FORESTER THAT APPROVES A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED APPROVAL FOR RECOVERY OF THE ELECTRIC - 57 - H.B.
2201 B.UTILITY'S COSTS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN THROUGH RATES FOR SERVICE CHARGED TO THE ELECTRIC UTILITY'S CUSTOMERS.
THE COMMISSION SHALL REVIEW THE SUBMITTED WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN TO ENSURE THAT THE PLAN:
1.
COMPLIES WITH THIS CHAPTER AND ALL APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS.
2.
IS REASONABLE.
3.
IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST.
THEAN COMMISSIONELECTRIC MAYUTILITY REQUESTTHAT ADDITIONALIS INFORMATIONAN ORELECTRIC ACOOPERATIVE MODIFICATIONWITH TOFEWER THETHAN SUBMITTEDFORTY WILDFIRETHOUSAND MITIGATIONMETERS PLANIN WITHINTHIS ONESTATE HUNDREDAS TWENTYOF DAYSJANUARY AFTER1, RECEIPT2025 OFMAY THEPREPARE AND SUBMIT A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN BYFOR PROVIDINGREVIEW WRITTENAND NOTICEAPPROVAL TO THE ELECTRICSTATE UTILITY.FORESTER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION.
IFAN THEELECTRIC COMMISSIONUTILITY DOESTHAT NOTIS REQUESTAN ADDITIONALELECTRIC INFORMATIONCOOPERATIVE WITH FORTY THOUSAND OR AMORE MODIFICATIONMETERS TOIN THETHIS STATE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2025 SHALL PREPARE A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN,PLAN AS PRESCRIBED IN SECTION 37-1311, SUBSECTION H AND MAY SUBMIT THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN ISTO DEEMEDTHE ADMINISTRATIVELYSTATE APPROVEDFORESTER ATAS THEPRESCRIBED EXPIRATIONIN OFSUBSECTION ONEA HUNDREDOF TWENTYTHIS DAYS.SECTION.
WITHINIF NINETYAN DAYSELECTRIC AFTERUTILITY RECEIPTTHAT OFIS THEAN NOTICEELECTRIC PRESCRIBEDCOOPERATIVE INDOES SUBSECTIONNOT CSUBMIT OFA THISWILDFIRE SECTION,MITIGATION PLAN TO THE ELECTRICSTATE UTILITYFORESTER SHALLFOR REVISEREVIEW THEAND ELECTRICAPPROVAL UTILITY'SPURSUANT WILDFIRETO MITIGATIONSECTION PLAN37-1311, TOTHIS ADDRESSCHAPTER THEDOES COMMISSION'SNOT REQUEST.APPLY TO THAT ELECTRIC UTILITY.
THE COMMISSION HAS SIXTY DAYS TO CONSIDER THE ELECTRIC UTILITY'S RESPONSE AND ANY PROPOSED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR MODIFICATION TO THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IS DEEMED APPROVED DURING THE PENDENCY OF ANY JUDICIAL ACTION THAT SEEKS REVIEW OF THE COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OR REJECTION OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN OR ANY PORTION OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
IF THE COMMISSION DOES NOT REQUEST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR A MODIFICATION TO THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN, THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IS DEEMED ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED AT THE EXPIRATION OF SIXTY DAYS.
E.
THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
1.
A DESCRIPTION OF AREAS WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC REGION WHERE THE UTILITIES FACILITIES MAY BE SUBJECT TO A HEIGHTENED RISK OF WILDFIRE.
2.
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS THAT THE ELECTRIC UTILITY WILL USE TO INSPECT AND OPERATE THE ELECTRIC UTILITY'S INFRASTRUCTURE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF WILDFIRES.
3.
A DESCRIPTION OF THE KEY INDIVIDUALS OR POSITION TITLES OF THOSE PERSONS WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
4.
A DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR DEENERGIZING POWER LINES AND DISABLING RECLOSERS TO MITIGATE POTENTIAL WILDFIRES OR PROVIDE A PUBLIC SAFETY POWER SHUT OFF PLAN.
5.
A PLAN FOR VEGETATION MANAGEMENT.
6.
A SUMMARY OF THE PROCEDURES THE ELECTRIC UTILITY INTENDS TO USE TO RESTORE THE ELECTRIC UTILITY'S ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IN THE EVENT OF A WILDFIRE.
7.
A DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PUBLIC AWARENESS EFFORTS.
8.
A DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL PARTICIPATION, IF APPLICABLE, WITH STATE OR LOCAL WILDFIRE PROTECTION EFFORTS.
- 6 - H.B.
2201 9.
A DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE ELECTRIC UTILITY WILL MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
F.
AN ELECTRIC UTILITY MAY REFERENCE PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS THAT ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED IN THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN IN LIEU OF THE REQUIREMENTS UNDER SUBSECTION E OF THIS SECTION.
REFERENCED MATERIAL MUST BE INCLUDED AS ATTACHMENTS TO THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN SUBMISSION.
G.
ON OR BEFORE MAY 1, 2026 AND EVERY EVEN-NUMBERED YEAR THEREAFTER UNLESS AN ELECTRIC UTILITY'S GOVERNING BOARD ORDERS OTHERWISE, AN ELECTRIC UTILITY THAT IS GOVERNED BY AN ELECTED BOARD SHALL SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ELECTRIC UTILITY'S WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN TO THE ELECTED BOARD, INSTEAD OF THE COMMISSION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.
THE ELECTED BOARD SHALL REPLACE THE ROLE OF THE COMMISSION FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION.
BEFORE AN ELECTRIC UTILITY SUBMITS A WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN TO THE ELECTED BOARD, THE ELECTRIC UTILITY SHALL CONSULT WITH A STATE OR FEDERAL LAND MANAGEMENT OR FIRE PROTECTION AGENCY THAT HAS AUTHORITY IN THE ELECTRIC UTILITY'S SERVICE TERRITORY, AS APPLICABLE, AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN.
FOR ANY CAUSE OF ACTION FOR NEGLIGENCE AGAINST AN ELECTRIC UTILITY THAT IS RELATED TO A WILDFIRE, ALLAN OFELECTRIC UTILITY THAT ACTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ELEMENTSAPPROVED MUSTWILDFIRE BEMITIGATION PROVENPLAN BYIS CLEARDEEMED ANDTO CONVINCINGMEET EVIDENCE.THE STANDARD OF CARE FOR A REASONABLY PRUDENT ELECTRIC UTILITY.
A PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR NEGLIGENCE SHALL PROVE THAT A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN WAS A PROXIMATE CAUSE OF ANY LOSS, INJURY OR OTHER HARM ALLEGED.
NOTWITHSTANDING SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION, AN ELECTRIC UTILITY THAT SUBSTANTIALLYENGAGES ACTS IN COMPLIANCEWILFUL, WITHINTENTIONAL THEOR APPROVEDRECKLESS WILDFIREMISCONDUCT MITIGATIONTHAT PLANCAUSES A WILDFIRE IS NOT DEEMED TO MEET THE STANDARD OF CARE FOR A REASONABLY PRUDENT ELECTRIC UTILITYUTILITY. UNLESS THERE IS CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE OF WILFUL, INTENTIONAL OR RECKLESS MISCONDUCT.
AN ELECTRIC UTILITY SHALL NOT BE APPORTIONED ANY PROPORTION OF FAULT FOR THE IGNITION OF A WILDFIRE FROM SOURCES THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF THE ELECTRIC UTILITY'S CONTROL, INCLUDING LIGHTNING STRIKES OR ACTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES.
AN ELECTRIC UTILITY SHALL NOT BE APPORTIONED ANY PROPORTION OF FAULT FOR VEGETATION OR OTHER WILDFIRE RISKS OUTSIDE OF THE ELECTRIC UTILITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY, LEASE OR OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS OR AREAS IN WHICH THE ELECTRIC UTILITY HAS BEEN DELAYED IN ACCESSING OR DENIED ACCESS TO FOR PURPOSES OF PERFORMING VEGETATION MANAGEMENT.MANAGEMENT IF THE DELAY OR DENIAL IS OUTSIDE OF THE ELECTRIC UTILITY'S REASONABLE CONTROL.
-F. 7 - H.B.
2201IN F.AN ACTION AGAINST AN ELECTRIC UTILITY TO RECOVER ANY DAMAGES THAT RESULT FROM A WILDFIRE, NEITHER EXEMPLARY NOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES OF ANY - 8 - H.B.
IN2201 ANKIND ACTIONMAY PURSUANTBE TORECOVERED, THISONLY SECTIONPROVIDED, TOHOWEVER, RECOVERTHAT ANYAFTER DAMAGESIT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED THAT RESULTAN FROMELECTRIC AUTILITY, WILDFIRE,WHICH NEITHERIS CONSEQUENTIALNOT PROPERTYAN DAMAGESELECTRIC NORCOOPERATIVE, EXEMPLARYIS ORLIABLE PUNITIVEFOR BODILYPERSONAL INJURY OR PROPERTYBODILY HARM THAT RESULTS FROM A WILDFIRE, SUCH DAMAGES SHALLMAY BE RECOVERED.SOUGHT IF THE PLAINTIFF PROVES BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFENDANT ELECTRIC UTILITY'S CONDUCT WAS BOTH:
1.
OUTRAGEOUS, OPPRESSIVE OR INTOLERABLE.
2.
CONSCIOUSLY PURSUED KNOWINGLY OR WITH INTENTIONAL DISREGARD THAT THE CONDUCT CREATED A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF SIGNIFICANT PHYSICAL INJURY TO OTHERS.
-Sec. 8 -
4.
Exemption from rulemaking Notwithstanding any other law, the Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management is exempt from the rulemaking requirements of title 41, chapter 6, Arizona Revised Statutes, for one year after the effective date of this act.
APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MAY 12, 2025.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MAY 12, 2025.
- 9 -
Show all 214 changed rows (174 more)
View plain text versions (12)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- HOUSE - 2201LAND AGRICULTURE RURAL AFFAIRS.PDF View text pdf
- SENATE - Finance View text pdf
- HOUSE - Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs View text pdf
- HOUSE - Land, Agriculture & Rural Affairs - Strike Everything View text pdf
- Amended HOUSE - Floor Amend to Engrossed Bill - Carter N. - passed pdf
- Amended SENATE - Fernandez #1 flr amend (ref FIN) adopted pdf
- Amended SENATE - Fernandez #2 flr amend (ref FIN) adopted pdf
- Amended SENATE - Mesnard flr amend (ref FIN) adopted pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Transmit to Governor
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
DPA
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
PASSED
-
PASSED
-
FAILED
-
DPA
-
DPA/SE
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Gail Griffin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 40 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Gail Griffin Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 6 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 23% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Yea |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Yea |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Yea |
| Kiana Sears | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Yea |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Nay |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 12 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 23 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 42% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Yea |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Yea |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Yea |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Yea |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Yea |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Nay |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Yea |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Yea |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Nay |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Nay |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Nay |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Nay |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Nay |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Nay |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Nay |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Nay |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Nay |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 9 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 19 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 47% | 53% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Nay |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Yea |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Yea |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Yea |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Nay |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Yea |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Nay |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Nay |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Nay |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Nay |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Nay |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Nay |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Nay |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Nay |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Nay |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Nay |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Nay |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Nay |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Nay |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2201?
- HB 2201 is sponsored by Gail Griffin (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2201?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 23, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2201?
- Track HB 2201 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2201
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2201
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →