Arizona 57th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SCR 1009 — revenue increases; administrative fee authorization

Last action — DP

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

71 added · 80 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the latest version of SCR 1009, a new section was added that specifically mentions the authorization of administrative fees related to revenue increases. This update clarifies the bill's intent to manage additional administrative costs associated with raising revenue. It matters because it helps ensure that funds raised are appropriately allocated for administrative purposes, promoting transparency and efficiency in government spending.

→
Previous
Latest
Fifty-seventh Legislature Finance First Regular Session S.C.R.
Senate Engrossed revenue increases;
1009 PROPOSED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO S.C.R.
administrative fee authorization State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 1009 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA;
1009 (Reference to printed bill) Amendment instruction key:
AMENDING ARTICLE IX, SECTION 22, CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA;
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
RELATING TO STATE REVENUES.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - S.C.R.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
1009 Be it resolved by the Senate of the State of Arizona, the House of Representatives concurring:
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The resolution as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
Vote required to increase or decrease state revenues;
Vote required to increase state revenues;
(A) An act that provides for a net increase [OR DECREASE] in state revenues, as described in subsection B OF THIS SECTION is effective on the affirmative vote of two- thirds of the members of each house of the legislature.
(A) An act that provides for a net increase in state revenues, as described in subsection B OF THIS SECTION is effective on the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members of each house of the legislature.
(B) The requirements of this section apply to any act that provides for a net increase [OR DECREASE] in state revenues in the form of:
(B) The requirements of this section apply to any act that provides for a net increase in state revenues in the form of:
The imposition of any new tax [OR THE ELIMINATION OF ANY EXISTING TAX].
The imposition of any new tax.
An increase [OR DECREASE] in a tax rate or rates.
An increase in a tax rate or rates.
[A][AN INCREASE,] reduction or elimination of a tax deduction, exemption, exclusion, credit or other tax exemption feature in computing tax liability.
A reduction or elimination of a tax deduction, exemption, exclusion, credit or other tax exemption feature in computing tax liability.
An increase [OR DECREASE] in a statutorily prescribed state fee or assessment or an increase [OR Senate Amendments to S.C.R.
An increase in a statutorily prescribed state fee or assessment or an increase in a statutorily prescribed maximum limit for an administratively set fee.
1009 DECREASE] in a statutorily prescribed maximum limit for an administratively set fee.
The elimination [OR ESTABLISHMENT] of an exemption from a statutorily prescribed state fee or assessment.
The elimination of an exemption from a statutorily prescribed state fee or assessment.
3.
- 1 - S.C.R.
1009 3.
Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform DENISE “MITZI” EPSTEIN SCR10090301.docx 01/31/2025 03:01 PM S:
- 2 -
MG/ci -2-
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. DP

  2. House Second Reading

  3. House First Reading.

  4. Transmit to House

  5. PASSED

  6. DP

  7. DP

  8. Senate Second Reading

  9. Senate First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 17 Yea · 11 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 01102
Republican 17000
Total 171102
% of votes cast 57%37%0%7%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Burch Democrat Not Voting
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Not Voting
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SCR 1009?
SCR 1009 is sponsored by J.D. Mesnard (Republican).
What is the current status of SCR 1009?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SCR 1009?
Track SCR 1009 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SCR 1009

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SCR 1009

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →