Arizona 57th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: Passed House 11 R cosponsors

HB 2869 — municipal development; independent provider review

Last action — DP

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

6 added · 8 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes made to HB 2869 involve adding the references to "municipal development" and "independent provider review." Additionally, some duplicate references to the bill itself have been removed. These alterations help clarify the focus of the bill and eliminate unnecessary repetition, making it easier for everyone to understand its purpose. This matters because clearer communication can lead to a more informed discussion and better decision-making regarding municipal development and service provider oversight.

→
Previous
Latest
REFERENCE TITLE:
House Engrossed municipal development;
municipal development;
independent provider review State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2869 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 6.4, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 9-470.01;
independent provider review State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session HB 2869 Introduced by Representatives Way:
Biasiucci, Carbone, Carter N, Heap, Lopez, Marshall, Montenegro, Nguyen, Olson, Weninger AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 4, ARTICLE 6.4, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 9-470.01;
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - HB 2869 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - H.B.
2869 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
IF AN APPLICANT RETAINS AN INDEPENDENT PROVIDER FOR THE PURPOSES OF REVIEWING AN APPLICATION OR PROVIDING A BUILDING INSPECTION, THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL REDUCE THE FEE THE MUNICIPALITY CHARGES FOR AN APPLICATION REVIEW OR PERFORMING A BUILDING INSPECTION BY AN AMOUNT EQUAL - 1 - HB 2869 TO THE AMOUNT THE MUNICIPALITY SAVES BY NOT PERFORMING THE APPLICATION REVIEW OR BUILDING INSPECTION.
IF AN APPLICANT RETAINS AN INDEPENDENT PROVIDER FOR THE PURPOSES OF REVIEWING AN APPLICATION OR PROVIDING A BUILDING INSPECTION, THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL REDUCE THE FEE THE MUNICIPALITY CHARGES FOR AN APPLICATION REVIEW OR PERFORMING A BUILDING INSPECTION BY AN AMOUNT EQUAL - 1 - H.B.
2869 TO THE AMOUNT THE MUNICIPALITY SAVES BY NOT PERFORMING THE APPLICATION REVIEW OR BUILDING INSPECTION.
IF THE MUNICIPALITY DOES NOT APPROVE THE APPLICATION OR PROVIDE THE SECOND WRITTEN NOTICE WITHIN FIVE DAYS AFTER THE APPLICANT RESUBMITS THE - 2 - HB 2869 APPLICATION, THE APPLICATION SHALL BE DEEMED APPROVED AND ANY NECESSARY PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE MUNICIPALITY ON THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY.
IF THE MUNICIPALITY DOES NOT APPROVE THE APPLICATION OR PROVIDE THE SECOND WRITTEN NOTICE WITHIN FIVE DAYS AFTER THE APPLICANT RESUBMITS THE - 2 - H.B.
2869 APPLICATION, THE APPLICATION SHALL BE DEEMED APPROVED AND ANY NECESSARY PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE MUNICIPALITY ON THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. DP

  2. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  3. DP

  4. House Second Reading

  5. W/D

  6. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 82 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (10)

Not signed on (82)

82 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 82 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

public-safety housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2869?
HB 2869 is sponsored by Jeff Weninger (Republican), Justin Olson (Republican), Quang H Nguyen (Republican), Steve Montenegro (Republican), Chris Lopez (Republican), Ralph Heap (Republican), Neal Carter (Republican), Michael Carbone (Republican), Leo Biasiucci (Republican), Michael Way (Republican), and David Marshall, Sr. (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 2869?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2869?
Track HB 2869 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2869

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 2869

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →