Arizona 57th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: Enacted 20 R cosponsors

HB 2742 — court-ordered evaluations

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on May 13, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 66% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 20 sponsors

    1 primary, 19 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (20 R).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    3 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

188 added · 164 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill HB 2742 includes several additions, most notably the requirement for the screening agency to log the time and date of each application received and act on it within 48 hours, excluding weekends and holidays. This change aims to enhance accountability and responsiveness in handling applications for court-ordered evaluations. Additionally, the amendment adds a provision that allows the screening agency to assist applicants with crafting their applications, which may help ensure that they are submitted correctly and efficiently. Overall, these enhancements are designed to streamline the process and improve support for applicants.

→
Previous
Latest
House Engrossed court-ordered evaluations State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2742 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 36-520, 36-530 AND 36-531, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
Senate Engrossed House Bill court-ordered evaluations State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER 211 HOUSE BILL 2742 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 36-520, 36-530, 36-531 AND 36-545.06, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
A statement by the applicant of whether the applicant believes that, without a period of inpatient observation, stabilization and assessment, or emergency inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, the - 1 - H.B.
A statement by the applicant of whether the applicant believes that, without a period of inpatient observation, stabilization and assessment, or emergency inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, the proposed patient is likely to cause or endure serious physical harm or injury and the facts supporting that statement.
2742 proposed patient is likely to cause or endure serious physical harm or injury and the facts supporting that statement.
- 1 - H.B.
10.
2742 10.
If a person is being treated by prayer or spiritual means alone in accordance with the tenets and practices of a recognized church or religious denomination by a duly accredited practitioner of that church or denomination, the person may not be ordered evaluated, detained or - 2 - H.B.
If a person is being treated by prayer or spiritual means alone in accordance with the tenets and practices of a recognized church or religious denomination by a duly accredited practitioner of that church or denomination, the person may not be ordered evaluated, detained or involuntarily treated unless the court has determined that the person is, as a result of mental disorder, a danger to others or to self.
2742 involuntarily treated unless the court has determined that the person is, as a result of mental disorder, a danger to others or to self.
- 2 - H.B.
I.
2742 I.
- 3 - H.B.
B.
2742 B.
FILING WITH THE COURT SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVENTY-TWO HOURS AFTER ADMISSION, EXCLUDING WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS.
UNLESS THE PERSON IS RELEASED OR ADMITTED ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS, THE FILING OF THE PETITION FOR COURT-ORDERED TREATMENT - 3 - H.B.
2742 SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVENTY-TWO HOURS, EXCLUDING WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS.
A person WHO IS being evaluated on an inpatient basis in an evaluation agency shall be released within seventy-two hours, excluding weekends and holidays, from AFTER the time that the person is hospitalized pursuant to a court order for evaluation, unless the person applies for further care and treatment on a voluntary basis or unless a petition for - 4 - H.B.
A person WHO IS being evaluated on an inpatient basis in an evaluation agency shall be released within seventy-two hours, excluding weekends and holidays, from the time that the person is hospitalized pursuant to a court order for evaluation, unless the person applies for further care and treatment on a voluntary basis or unless a petition for court-ordered treatment has been filed pursuant to subsection B of this section.
2742 court-ordered treatment has been filed pursuant to subsection B of this section.
- 4 - H.B.
E.
2742 E.
- 5 -
Sec.
4.
Section 36-545.06, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
36-545.06.
County services;
county responsibility A.
Each county, or any combination of counties, shall provide directly or by contract the services of a screening agency and an evaluation agency for the purposes of this chapter.
B.
On a request made by a resident of the county pursuant to this chapter, a county shall be required to provide screening or evaluation.
C.
Each county shall coordinate the provision of mental health services required pursuant to this section with the administration or as delegated by the administration to a regional behavioral health authority.
D.
FOR A PERSON WHO IS ADMITTED TO AN EVALUATION AGENCY FOR A COURT-ORDERED EVALUATION, THE COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITY CONTINUES UNTIL THE EVALUATION PERIOD ENDS, WHICH IS WHEN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING OCCURS:
1.
THE PETITION FOR COURT-ORDERED TREATMENT IS FILED WITH THE COURT.
2.
THE INDIVIDUAL AGREES TO VOLUNTARY TREATMENT.
3.
THE INDIVIDUAL IS RELEASED FROM COURT-ORDERED EVALUATION.
- 5 - APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MAY 13, 2025.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MAY 13, 2025.
- 6 -
View plain text versions (6)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. PASSED

  4. PASSED

  5. Transmit to House

  6. PASSED

  7. DPA

  8. DPA

  9. Senate Second Reading

  10. Senate First Reading

  11. Transmit to Senate

  12. PASSED

  13. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  14. DP

  15. House Second Reading

  16. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 19 co-sponsors · 73 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (19)

Not signed on (73)

73 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 73 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 26 Yea · 2 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 9202
Republican 17000
Total 26202
% of votes cast 87%7%0%7%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Yea
Brian Fernandez Democrat Not Voting
Catherine Miranda Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Yea
Eva Diaz Democrat Yea
Flavio Bravo Democrat Yea
Kiana Sears Democrat Yea
Lauren Kuby Democrat Yea
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Not Voting
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Yea
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Nay
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 57 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 27000
Republican 30003
Total 57003
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Yea
Alma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Anna Abeytia Democrat Yea
Betty J Villegas Democrat Yea
Brian Garcia Democrat Yea
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Yea
Christopher Mathis Democrat Yea
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Yea
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Yea
Janeen Connolly Democrat Yea
Junelle Cavero Democrat Yea
Kevin Volk Democrat Yea
Lorena Austin Democrat Yea
Lupe Contreras Democrat Yea
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Yea
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Yea
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Yea
Myron Tsosie Democrat Yea
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Yea
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Yea
Patty Contreras Democrat Yea
Quantá Crews Democrat Yea
Sarah Liguori Democrat Yea
Seth Blattman Democrat Yea
Stacey Travers Democrat Yea
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Yea
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Yea
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Not Voting
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Not Voting
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Yea
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Not Voting
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2742?
HB 2742 is sponsored by Justin Wilmeth (Republican), Julie Willoughby (Republican), Jeff Weninger (Republican), Michael Way (Republican), James Taylor (Republican), Tony Rivero (Republican), Khyl Powell (Republican), Michele Peña (Republican), Quang H Nguyen (Republican), Steve Montenegro (Republican), Teresa Martinez (Republican), Gail Griffin (Republican), John Gillette (Republican), Lupe Diaz (Republican), Neal Carter (Republican), Michael Carbone (Republican), Walt Blackman (Republican), Leo Biasiucci (Republican), Chris Lopez (Republican), and David Marshall, Sr. (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 2742?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 2742?
Track HB 2742 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2742

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2742

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →