HB 2152 — right to jury; domestic relations
Last action — Senate Second Reading
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
48 added · 72 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to House Bill 2152 introduces provisions that allow parties in domestic relations cases to request attorney fees, costs, and expert witness fees if they have insufficient resources. This is important because it helps ensure that individuals who may not be able to afford legal representation can still have access to fair legal support during their cases. Additionally, the amendment mandates that the court will appoint an attorney for any party deemed unable to afford legal counsel. This change aims to promote fairness and equity in family court proceedings by providing necessary resources to those in need.
HOUSEHouse FLOOREngrossed AMENDMENTright EXPLANATIONto Billjury; Number:
HBdomestic 2152relations KeshelState Floorof AmendmentArizona •House Allowsof eitherRepresentatives partyFifty-seventh inLegislature specifiedFirst proceedingsRegular toSession requestHOUSE attorneyBILL fees,2152 costsAN andACT expertAMENDING witnessTITLE fees25, forCHAPTER the11, purposeARTICLE of1, adequateARIZONA legalREVISED representationSTATUTES, forBY theADDING partySECTION with25-1502; insufficient resources.
•RELATING AuthorizesTO theDOMESTIC court,RELATIONS uponPROCEEDINGS. a finding of financial disparity between the parties, to order payment of reasonable fees, expenses and costs.
•(TEXT SpecifiesOF rulesBILL adoptedBEGINS byON theNEXT SupremePAGE) Court- musti include- aH.B. mandatory pre- trial conference to exchange evidence prior to the trial.
•2152 MakesBe ait conformingenacted change.by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Amendment explanation prepared by S.
Robinson Phone Number 6-3273 jh 2/26/2025 Fifty-seventh Legislature Keshel First Regular Session H.B.
2152 ADDITIONAL COW KESHEL FLOOR AMENDMENT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
2152 (Reference to House engrossed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
House(f) AmendmentsANY toOTHER H.B.ISSUE MANDATED BY STATUTE THAT IS ALLEGED IN THE PETITION.
2152 (f) ANY OTHER ISSUE MANDATED BY STATUTE THAT IS ALLEGED IN THE PETITION.
[E.E.
EITHER PARTY TO A PROCEEDING FILED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION MAY REQUEST ATTORNEY FEES, COSTS AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES TO ENABLE THE PARTY WITH INSUFFICIENT RESOURCES TO OBTAIN ADEQUATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND TO PREPARE- EVIDENCE1 FOR- THEH.B. TRIAL.
2152 PREPARE EVIDENCE FOR THE TRIAL.
IF THE COURT FINDS THAT EITHER PARTY HAS INSUFFICIENT RESOURCES TO OBTAIN LEGAL REPRESENTATION, ON REQUEST, THE COURT SHALL APPOINT AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT THAT PARTY.]PARTY. [E.] [G.] THE SUPREME COURT MAY ADOPT RULES FOR FAMILY COURT JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS SECTION.
[RULESG. ADOPTED BY THE SUPREME COURT SHALL INCLUDE A MANDATORY PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE TO BE HELD BEFORE THE SCHEDULING OF A TRIAL PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION TO EXCHANGE ALL EVIDENCED INTENDED TO BE PRESENTED BY EITHER PARTY AT THE TRIAL.] Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform RACHEL KESHEL 2152FloorKESHEL.docx 02/26/2025 3:00 PM C:
LATTHE -2-SUPREME COURT MAY ADOPT RULES FOR FAMILY COURT JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS SECTION.
RULES ADOPTED BY THE SUPREME COURT SHALL INCLUDE A MANDATORY PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE TO BE HELD BEFORE THE SCHEDULING OF A TRIAL PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION TO EXCHANGE ALL EVIDENCE INTENDED TO BE PRESENTED BY EITHER PARTY AT THE TRIAL.
- 2 -
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current pdf
- Amended HOUSE - Floor Amend to Engrossed Bill - Keshel - passed pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Senate Second Reading
-
Senate First Reading
-
Transmit to Senate
-
PASSED
-
DPA
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
House Placed on Consent Calendar
-
DP
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
Sponsors
- Rachel Keshel · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 25 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Rachel Keshel Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 2 | 24 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 31 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 25 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 42% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Nay |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Nay |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Yea |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Nay |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Nay |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Yea |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Not Voting |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Nay |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Yea |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Yea |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Yea |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2152?
- HB 2152 is sponsored by Rachel Keshel (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 2152?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2152?
- Track HB 2152 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2152
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2152
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →