Arizona 57th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: Passed House 1 R cosponsors

HB 2152 — right to jury; domestic relations

Last action — Senate Second Reading

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

48 added · 72 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to House Bill 2152 introduces provisions that allow parties in domestic relations cases to request attorney fees, costs, and expert witness fees if they have insufficient resources. This is important because it helps ensure that individuals who may not be able to afford legal representation can still have access to fair legal support during their cases. Additionally, the amendment mandates that the court will appoint an attorney for any party deemed unable to afford legal counsel. This change aims to promote fairness and equity in family court proceedings by providing necessary resources to those in need.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE FLOOR AMENDMENT EXPLANATION Bill Number:
House Engrossed right to jury;
HB 2152 Keshel Floor Amendment • Allows either party in specified proceedings to request attorney fees, costs and expert witness fees for the purpose of adequate legal representation for the party with insufficient resources.
domestic relations State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2152 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 25, CHAPTER 11, ARTICLE 1, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 25-1502;
• Authorizes the court, upon a finding of financial disparity between the parties, to order payment of reasonable fees, expenses and costs.
RELATING TO DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEEDINGS.
• Specifies rules adopted by the Supreme Court must include a mandatory pre- trial conference to exchange evidence prior to the trial.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) - i - H.B.
• Makes a conforming change.
2152 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Amendment explanation prepared by S.
Robinson Phone Number 6-3273 jh 2/26/2025 Fifty-seventh Legislature Keshel First Regular Session H.B.
2152 ADDITIONAL COW KESHEL FLOOR AMENDMENT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AMENDMENTS TO H.B.
2152 (Reference to House engrossed bill) Amendment instruction key:
[GREEN UNDERLINING IN BRACKETS] indicates text added to statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green underlining in brackets] indicates text added to new session law or text restoring existing law.
[GREEN STRIKEOUT IN BRACKETS] indicates new text removed from statute or previously enacted session law.
[Green strikeout in brackets] indicates text removed from existing statute, previously enacted session law or new session law.
<<Green carets>> indicate a section added to the bill.
<<Green strikeout in carets>> indicates a section removed from the bill.
The bill as proposed to be amended is reprinted as follows:
House Amendments to H.B.
(f) ANY OTHER ISSUE MANDATED BY STATUTE THAT IS ALLEGED IN THE PETITION.
2152 (f) ANY OTHER ISSUE MANDATED BY STATUTE THAT IS ALLEGED IN THE PETITION.
[E.
E.
EITHER PARTY TO A PROCEEDING FILED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION MAY REQUEST ATTORNEY FEES, COSTS AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES TO ENABLE THE PARTY WITH INSUFFICIENT RESOURCES TO OBTAIN ADEQUATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND TO PREPARE EVIDENCE FOR THE TRIAL.
EITHER PARTY TO A PROCEEDING FILED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION MAY REQUEST ATTORNEY FEES, COSTS AND EXPERT WITNESS FEES TO ENABLE THE PARTY WITH INSUFFICIENT RESOURCES TO OBTAIN ADEQUATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND TO - 1 - H.B.
2152 PREPARE EVIDENCE FOR THE TRIAL.
IF THE COURT FINDS THAT EITHER PARTY HAS INSUFFICIENT RESOURCES TO OBTAIN LEGAL REPRESENTATION, ON REQUEST, THE COURT SHALL APPOINT AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT THAT PARTY.] [E.] [G.] THE SUPREME COURT MAY ADOPT RULES FOR FAMILY COURT JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS SECTION.
IF THE COURT FINDS THAT EITHER PARTY HAS INSUFFICIENT RESOURCES TO OBTAIN LEGAL REPRESENTATION, ON REQUEST, THE COURT SHALL APPOINT AN ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT THAT PARTY.
[RULES ADOPTED BY THE SUPREME COURT SHALL INCLUDE A MANDATORY PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE TO BE HELD BEFORE THE SCHEDULING OF A TRIAL PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION TO EXCHANGE ALL EVIDENCED INTENDED TO BE PRESENTED BY EITHER PARTY AT THE TRIAL.] Enroll and engross to conform Amend title to conform RACHEL KESHEL 2152FloorKESHEL.docx 02/26/2025 3:00 PM C:
G.
LAT -2-
THE SUPREME COURT MAY ADOPT RULES FOR FAMILY COURT JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS SECTION.
RULES ADOPTED BY THE SUPREME COURT SHALL INCLUDE A MANDATORY PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE TO BE HELD BEFORE THE SCHEDULING OF A TRIAL PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION TO EXCHANGE ALL EVIDENCE INTENDED TO BE PRESENTED BY EITHER PARTY AT THE TRIAL.
- 2 -
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Senate Second Reading

  2. Senate First Reading

  3. Transmit to Senate

  4. PASSED

  5. DPA

  6. PASSED

  7. DP

  8. House Placed on Consent Calendar

  9. DP

  10. House Second Reading

  11. House First Reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 25 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 33 Yea · 25 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 22401
Republican 31101
Total 332502
% of votes cast 55%42%0%3%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Nay
Anna Abeytia Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Not Voting
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Yea
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Nay
Kevin Volk Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Yea
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Nay
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Nay
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Not Voting
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Yea
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Nay
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Yea
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2152?
HB 2152 is sponsored by Rachel Keshel (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 2152?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2152?
Track HB 2152 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2152

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2152

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →