Arizona 57th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 11 R · 1 D cosponsors

SB 1604 — licensed secure facility; incompetent defendants

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Katie Hobbs (Democratic) on May 02, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · high confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 12 sponsors

    1 primary, 11 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (11 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.

  • Mixed recorded votes

    3 passed, 3 failed in recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

38 added · 172 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to Bill SB 1604 clarify the rules for secure behavioral health residential facilities in Arizona. The key change specifies that a facility cannot treat both types of court-committed patients and must strictly limit its services to those who are committed under specific court orders. This change is significant because it aims to enhance the safety and quality of care provided, ensuring that patients receive appropriate treatment based on their individual legal commitments.

→
Previous
Latest
Senate Engrossed licensed secure facility;
House Engrossed Senate Bill licensed secure facility;
defendants) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1604 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS 13-712, 13-4521 AND 36-425.06, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
defendants) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER 113 SENATE BILL 1604 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 36-425.06, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
Section 13-712, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
13-712.
Calculation of terms of imprisonment A.
A sentence of imprisonment commences when sentence is imposed if the defendant is in custody or surrenders into custody at that time.
Otherwise it commences when the defendant becomes actually in custody.
B.
All time actually spent in custody pursuant to an offense until the prisoner is sentenced to imprisonment for such offense shall be credited against the term of imprisonment otherwise provided for by this chapter.
A person who is found competent to stand trial after an involuntary commitment pursuant to section 13-4521 shall receive credit for all time that the person spent under the jurisdiction of the secure state mental health facility OR A LICENSED SECURE HEALTH FACILITY against a term of imprisonment for any of the charges that were the basis for the involuntary commitment.
C.
If a sentence of imprisonment is vacated and a new sentence is imposed on the defendant for the same offense, the new sentence is calculated as if it had commenced at the time the vacated sentence was imposed, and all time served under the vacated sentence shall be credited against the new sentence.
D.
If a person serving a sentence of imprisonment escapes from custody, the escape interrupts the sentence.
The interruption continues until the person is apprehended and confined for the escape or is confined and subject to a detainer for the escape.
Time spent in actual custody before return under this subsection shall be credited against the term authorized by law if custody rested on an arrest or surrender for the escape itself, or if the custody arose from an arrest on another charge which culminated in a dismissal or an acquittal, and the person was denied admission to bail pending disposition of that charge because of a warrant lodged against such person arising from the escape.
E.
The sentencing court shall include the time of commencement of sentence under subsection A of this section and the computation of time credited against sentence under subsection B, C or D of this section in the original or an amended commitment order, under procedures established by rule of court.
Sec.
2.
Section 13-4521, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
13-4521.
Dangerous and incompetent defendants;
proof evident hearing;
commitment trial;
disposition;
findings;
annual report A.
If a court enters an order pursuant to section 13-4517, subsection A, paragraph 4, the court shall hold a hearing within ten days after the order is issued to determine if the proof is evident or the presumption great that the defendant committed the act that constitutes a serious offense as defined in section 13-706.
If the court does not find - 1 - S.B.
1604 the proof is evident or the presumption great that the defendant committed the act, the court shall proceed pursuant to section 13-4517, subsection A, paragraph 1, 2 or 3.
B.
If the court does find the proof is evident or the presumption great pursuant to subsection A of this section, the court shall hold a trial within one hundred twenty days after the court issued the order pursuant to section 13-4517, subsection A, paragraph 4 to determine if the defendant is dangerous and should be involuntarily committed.
Unless the state or defendant requests a jury trial, a trial held pursuant to this subsection shall be before the court.
C.
The Arizona rules of evidence and the Arizona rules of civil procedure apply to proceedings held pursuant to this section, except that the court may consider evidence that is not admissible under the Arizona rules of evidence when making a determination pursuant to subsection A of this section.
D.
If there has not been a previous evaluation to determine whether the defendant is dangerous, the defendant shall be examined by mental health experts in accordance with the requirements of section 13-4509, subsection D to determine if the defendant should be considered dangerous.
The state and the defendant may each retain a mental health expert to examine the defendant and present the defendant's mental health evaluation at the trial.
E.
Show all 81 changed rows (41 more)
Previous
Latest
At a trial to determine if the defendant is dangerous, the state shall establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is dangerous and should be involuntarily committed.
If the factfinder does not find that the defendant is dangerous or does not find that the defendant should be involuntarily committed, the court shall proceed pursuant to section 13-4517, subsection A, paragraph 1, 2 or 3.
F.
If the factfinder finds that the defendant is dangerous and should be involuntarily committed, the court shall dismiss the charges against the defendant without prejudice and order the defendant to be committed to a secure state mental health facility OR, IF THE COURT DETERMINES THAT COMMITMENT TO A SECURE STATE MENTAL HEALTH FACILITY IS NOT FEASIBLE, TO THE CUSTODY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES FOR PLACEMENT IN A LICENSED SECURE HEALTH FACILITY.
The defendant shall receive education, care, supervision and treatment to render the defendant either competent or nondangerous.
G.
If the court issues a commitment order pursuant to this section:
1.
All further proceedings for the defendant's continued treatment and the circumstances under which the defendant may be released shall be conducted pursuant to title 36, chapter 40.
2.
The order shall require that the defendant remain committed to a secure state mental health facility OR, IF ORDERED BY THE COURT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION F OF THIS SECTION, TO A LICENSED SECURE HEALTH FACILITY until any of the following occurs:
(a) The court finds that the defendant is competent to stand trial.
- 2 - S.B.
1604 (b) The court finds that the defendant is no longer dangerous.
H.
A commitment order issued pursuant to this section may not be in effect for more than the presumptive sentence the defendant could have received for the highest charged offense pursuant to section 13-702 or 13-703, section 13-704, subsection A, B, C, D or E, section 13-705, section 13-706, subsection A, section 13-708, subsection D or section 13-751 or any section for which a specific sentence is authorized.
In making this determination, the court may not consider the sentence enhancements under section 13-703 or 13-704 for prior convictions.
The court shall consider all time a defendant has been in custody, including pretrial detention and custody under title 36.
I.
The court shall retain jurisdiction over a defendant who is committed pursuant to this section until the court discharges the defendant from treatment.
If a defendant is discharged or released on the expiration of a commitment order issued pursuant to this section, the medical director of the secure state mental health facility OR THE LICENSED SECURE HEALTH FACILITY from which the defendant is discharged or released or the state may file a petition stating that the defendant requires further treatment pursuant to title 36, chapter 5 or the appointment of a guardian pursuant to title 14.
J.
Findings by the court made pursuant to this section and, except as provided in section 13-4508, any statements made by the defendant during an examination by a mental health expert pursuant to section 13-4509 are inadmissible in any proceeding other than a proceeding under title 36, chapters 5 and 40.
K.
A person who is involuntarily committed to a secure state mental health facility OR A LICENSED SECURE HEALTH FACILITY pursuant to this section shall receive credit for all time spent under the jurisdiction of the secure state mental health facility OR THE LICENSED SECURE HEALTH FACILITY if the person is found competent to stand trial and is subsequently sentenced to the state department of corrections for any of the charges that were the basis for the involuntary commitment.
L.
The court shall annually report the following information for the previous year to the Arizona criminal justice commission:
1.
The number of court orders for a trial pursuant to section 13-4517, subsection A, paragraph 4, including the number of jury trials that were held.
2.
The number of defendants who are committed after a trial pursuant to this section.
3.
The number of committed defendants who are conditionally released to a less restrictive alternative.
4.
The number of committed defendants who are restored to competency or determined to not be dangerous and who are discharged.
- 3 - S.B.
1604 Sec.
3.
- 4 -
APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MAY 2, 2025.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MAY 2, 2025.
- 1 -
View plain text versions (8)

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor

  2. Transmit to Governor

  3. PASSED

  4. PASSED

  5. Transmit to Senate

  6. PASSED

  7. DPA

  8. DPA

  9. House Second Reading

  10. House First Reading.

  11. Transmit to House

  12. PASSED

  13. DPA

  14. DPA

  15. Senate Second Reading

  16. Senate First Reading

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 81 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (11)

Not signed on (81)

81 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 81 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 47 Yea · 8 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 15804
Republican 32001
Total 47805
% of votes cast 78%13%0%8%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Yea
Anna Abeytia Democrat Nay
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Not Voting
Christopher Mathis Democrat Yea
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Yea
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Yea
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Yea
Kevin Volk Democrat Yea
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Yea
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Not Voting
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Yea
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Yea
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Yea
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Yea
Patty Contreras Democrat Yea
Quantá Crews Democrat Not Voting
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Not Voting
Stacey Travers Democrat Yea
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Yea
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Yea
Alexander Kolodin Republican Yea
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Yea
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Not Voting
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Yea
Michele Peña Republican Yea
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Yea
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Yea
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 24 Yea · 3 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 7303
Republican 17000
Total 24303
% of votes cast 80%10%0%10%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Not Voting
Catherine Miranda Democrat Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Yea
Eva Burch Democrat Not Voting
Eva Diaz Democrat Not Voting
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Yea
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Yea
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Yea
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Yea
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1604?
SB 1604 is sponsored by Matt Gress (Republican), Leo Biasiucci (Republican), Carine Werner (Republican), Janae Shamp (Republican), Wendy Rogers (Republican), Kevin Payne (Republican), John Kavanagh (Republican), David Gowan (Republican), Brian Fernandez (Democrat), David C. Farnsworth (Republican), Timothy "Tim" Dunn (Republican), and Hildy Angius (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1604?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 10, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1604?
Track SB 1604 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1604

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1604

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →