SB 1013 — municipalities; counties; fee increases; vote
Last action — FAILED
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
28 added · 112 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Senate Bill 1013 now states that fee increases proposed by municipalities and counties will require a vote. This change is significant because it ensures local residents have a say in how much they pay for local services, rather than allowing officials to raise fees without public input.
House Engrossed Senate BillEngrossed municipalities;
vote (now:State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1013 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 3, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 9-256;
fentanyl;AMENDING TITLE 11, CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 2, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 11-225;
possession;RELATING TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT POWERS.
probation ineligibility) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1013 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 13-901.01, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
RELATING TO PROBATION.
SubjectTitle to9, thechapter requirements2, of article IV,3, part 1, section 1, Constitution of Arizona, section 13-901.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 9-256, to read:
13-901.01.9-256.
ProbationCommon forcouncil; persons convicted of possession or use of controlled substances or drug paraphernalia;
treatment;increase in taxes or fees;
prevention;two-thirds vote requirement;
education;state preemption A.
exceptions;NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, THE COMMON COUNCIL OF A MUNICIPALITY MAY NOT LEVY OR IMPOSE AN INCREASE IN ANY ASSESSMENT, TAX OR FEE WITHOUT A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE MUNICIPALITY.
definition A.
Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, any person who is convicted of the personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia is eligible for probation.
The court shall suspend the imposition or execution of sentence and place the person on probation.
AnyTHE personREGULATION whoOF hasINCREASES beenIN convictedMUNICIPAL ofASSESSMENTS, orTAXES indictedAND forFEES aIS violentA crimeMATTER asOF definedSTATEWIDE inCONCERN. section 13-901.03 is not eligible for probation as provided for in this section but instead shall be sentenced pursuant to chapter 34 of this title.
C.A MUNICIPALITY'S ABILITY TO INCREASE ASSESSMENTS, TAXES AND FEES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REGULATION BY A MUNICIPALITY.
Personal possession or use of a controlled substance pursuant to this section shall not include possession for sale, production, manufacturing or transportation for sale of any controlled substance.
D.
If a person is convicted of personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia, as a condition of probation, the court shall require participation in an appropriate drug treatment or education program administered by a qualified agency or organization that provides such programs to persons who abuse controlled substances.
Each person who is enrolled in a drug treatment or education program shall be required to pay for participation in the program to the extent of the person's financial ability.
E.
A person who has been placed on probation pursuant to this section and who is determined by the court to be in violation of probation shall have new conditions of probation established by the court.
The court shall select the additional conditions it deems necessary, including intensified drug treatment, community restitution, intensive probation, home arrest or any other sanctions except that the court shall not impose a term of incarceration unless the court determines that the person violated probation by committing an offense listed in chapter 34 or 34.1 of this title or an act in violation of an order of the court relating to drug treatment.
F.
If a person is convicted a second time of personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia, the court may include additional conditions of probation it deems necessary, including intensified drug treatment, community restitution, intensive probation, home arrest or any other action within the jurisdiction of the court.
G.
At any time while the defendant is on probation, if after having a reasonable opportunity to do so the defendant fails or refuses to participate in drug treatment, the probation department or the prosecutor may petition the court to revoke the defendant's probation.
If the court finds that the - 1 - S.B.
1013 defendant refused to participate in drug treatment, the defendant shall no longer be eligible for probation under this section but instead shall be sentenced pursuant to chapter 34 of this title.
H.
A person is not eligible for probation under this section but instead shall be sentenced pursuant to chapter 34 of this title if the court finds the person either:
1.
Had been convicted three times of personal possession of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia.
2.
Refused drug treatment as a term of probation.
3.
Rejected probation.
4.
Show all 73 changed lines (33 more)
Was convicted of the personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia and the offense involved methamphetamine.
5.
WAS CONVICTED OF THE PERSONAL POSSESSION OR USE OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OR DRUG PARAPHERNALIA AND THE OFFENSE INVOLVED FENTANYL.
THIS PARAGRAPH DOES NOT APPLY IF THE PERSON HAD POSSESSION OF A VALID MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION FOR FENTANYL.
I.
Subsections G and H of this section do not prohibit the defendant from being placed on probation pursuant to section 13-901 if the defendant otherwise qualifies for probation under that section.
J.
For the purposes of this section, "controlled substance" has the same meaning prescribed in section 36-2501.
LegislativeTitle findings11, A.chapter 2, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 11-225, to read:
The11-225. legislature finds that:
1.Board of supervisors;
Inincrease 1996,in thetaxes voters of this state passed the drug medicalization, prevention and control act, which generally provided that individuals convicted for the first or secondfees; time of personal possession or use of a controlled substance, including methamphetamine, were eligible for probation and could not be sentenced to a term of incarceration.
Onlytwo-thirds onvote arequirement; third conviction for personal possession or use of a controlled substance could an individual be sentenced to jail or prison, though probation remained a possibility under general sentencing laws.
2.state preemption A.
InNOTWITHSTANDING 2006,ANY theOTHER votersLAW, approvedTHE propositionBOARD 301OF amendingSUPERVISORS theOF lawA toCOUNTY allowMAY sentencingNOT aLEVY personOR convictedIMPOSE forAN theINCREASE firstIN orANY secondASSESSMENT, timeTAX ofOR personalFEE possessionWITHOUT orA useTWO-THIRDS ofVOTE methamphetamineOF toTHE aBOARD termOF ofSUPERVISORS incarceration.OF THE COUNTY.
This amendment recognized the particularly dangerous and highly addictive nature of methamphetamine and allowed courts to impose jail time as a condition of probation to encourage compliance with drug treatment and rehabilitation programs.
3.
Fentanyl has emerged as a leading cause of drug-related deaths in Arizona and across the United States.
The department of health services has reported a dramatic increase in opioid-related fatalities, with fentanyl now being the primary driver of overdose deaths.
Unlike many other controlled substances, even minute amounts of fentanyl can result in fatal consequences.
- 2 - S.B.
1013 4.
Arizona's proximity to the southern border has made it a major drug cartel trafficking corridor for illicit fentanyl evidenced by law enforcement agencies reporting an unprecedented rise in fentanyl-related seizures.
5.
The extreme potency of fentanyl poses a clear and present danger to Arizona families, first responders and communities.
Without stronger legal deterrents, fentanyl will continue to fuel addiction, crime and fatal overdoses at alarming rates.
TheTHE legislatureREGULATION intendsOF toINCREASES amendIN existingCOUNTY lawASSESSMENTS, toTAXES allowAND courtsFEES toIS imposeA aMATTER termOF ofSTATEWIDE incarcerationCONCERN. on individuals convicted for the first or second time of personal possession or use of fentanyl.
ThisA amendmentCOUNTY'S alignsABILITY withTO theINCREASE policyASSESSMENTS, establishedTAXES underAND propositionFEES 301PURSUANT forTO methamphetamineTHE andREQUIREMENTS ensuresOF thatSUBSECTION theA judicialOF systemTHIS hasSECTION theIS necessaryNOT authoritySUBJECT toTO enforceFURTHER treatmentREGULATION complianceBY andA reduceCOUNTY. the devastating impact of fentanyl abuse on individuals, families and communities.
Sec.- 1 -
3.
Requirements for enactment;
three-fourths vote Pursuant to article IV, part 1, section 1, Constitution of Arizona, section 13-901.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act, is effective only on the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of the members of each house of the legislature.
- 3 -
Show all 73 changed rows (33 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version pdf
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current pdf
- HOUSE - 1013JUDICIARY.PDF View text pdf
- HOUSE - Judiciary - Strike Everything View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
FAILED
-
DPA
-
DPA/SE
-
W/D
-
House Second Reading
-
House First Reading.
-
Transmit to House
-
PASSED
-
DP
-
Senate Second Reading
-
DP
-
Senate First Reading
-
Prefiled.
Sponsors
- Warren Petersen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 42 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Warren Petersen Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 25 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 26 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 26 | 30 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 43% | 50% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (60)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron Márquez | Democrat | Nay |
| Alma Hernandez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Anna Abeytia | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Betty J Villegas | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Cesar Aguilar | Democrat | Nay |
| Christopher Mathis | Democrat | Nay |
| Consuelo Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Elda Luna-Nájera | Democrat | Nay |
| Janeen Connolly | Democrat | Nay |
| Junelle Cavero | Democrat | Nay |
| Kevin Volk | Democrat | Nay |
| Lorena Austin | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Lydia Hernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Mae Peshlakai | Democrat | Nay |
| Mariana Sandoval | Democrat | Nay |
| Myron Tsosie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nancy Gutierrez | Democrat | Nay |
| Oscar De Los Santos | Democrat | Nay |
| Patty Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| Quantá Crews | Democrat | Nay |
| Sarah Liguori | Democrat | Nay |
| Seth Blattman | Democrat | Nay |
| Stacey Travers | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Simacek | Democrat | Nay |
| Stephanie Stahl Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Alexander Kolodin | Republican | Nay |
| Beverly Pingerelli | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Lopez | Republican | Yea |
| David Livingston | Republican | Yea |
| David Marshall, Sr. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| James Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Weninger | Republican | Yea |
| John Gillette | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph Chaplik | Republican | Nay |
| Julie Willoughby | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Olson | Republican | Yea |
| Justin Wilmeth | Republican | Yea |
| Khyl Powell | Republican | Yea |
| Laurin Hendrix | Republican | Yea |
| Leo Biasiucci | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Fink | Republican | Yea |
| Lupe Diaz | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Gress | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Carbone | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Way | Republican | Nay |
| Michele Peña | Republican | Not Voting |
| Neal Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Nick Kupper | Republican | Nay |
| Pamela Carter | Republican | Yea |
| Quang H Nguyen | Republican | Yea |
| Rachel Keshel | Republican | Nay |
| Ralph Heap | Republican | Yea |
| Selina Bliss | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Montenegro | Republican | Yea |
| Teresa Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Rivero | Republican | Yea |
| Walt Blackman | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 0 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 40% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Analise Ortiz | Democrat | Nay |
| Brian Fernandez | Democrat | Nay |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Denise “Mitzi” Epstein | Democrat | Nay |
| Eva Burch | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Eva Diaz | Democrat | Nay |
| Flavio Bravo | Democrat | Nay |
| Lauren Kuby | Democrat | Nay |
| Lela Alston | Democrat | Nay |
| Priya Sundareshan | Democrat | Nay |
| Rosanna Gabaldón | Democrat | Nay |
| Sally Ann Gonzales | Democrat | Nay |
| Theresa Hatathlie | Democrat | Nay |
| Carine Werner | Republican | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| David Gowan | Republican | Yea |
| Frank Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| Hildy Angius | Republican | Yea |
| J.D. Mesnard | Republican | Yea |
| Jake Hoffman | Republican | Yea |
| Janae Shamp | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Payne | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Finchem | Republican | Yea |
| Shawnna Bolick | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas "T.J." Shope | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy "Tim" Dunn | Republican | Yea |
| Venden "Vince" Leach | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Rogers | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1013?
- SB 1013 is sponsored by Warren Petersen (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1013?
- This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1013?
- Track SB 1013 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1013
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1013
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →