Arizona 57th Legislature - First Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 1013 — municipalities; counties; fee increases; vote

Last action — FAILED

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

28 added · 112 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Senate Bill 1013 now states that fee increases proposed by municipalities and counties will require a vote. This change is significant because it ensures local residents have a say in how much they pay for local services, rather than allowing officials to raise fees without public input.

→
Previous
Latest
House Engrossed Senate Bill municipalities;
Senate Engrossed municipalities;
vote (now:
vote State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1013 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 9, CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 3, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 9-256;
fentanyl;
AMENDING TITLE 11, CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 2, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 11-225;
possession;
RELATING TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT POWERS.
probation ineligibility) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-seventh Legislature First Regular Session SENATE BILL 1013 AN ACT AMENDING SECTION 13-901.01, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES;
RELATING TO PROBATION.
Subject to the requirements of article IV, part 1, section 1, Constitution of Arizona, section 13-901.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
Title 9, chapter 2, article 3, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 9-256, to read:
13-901.01.
9-256.
Probation for persons convicted of possession or use of controlled substances or drug paraphernalia;
Common council;
treatment;
increase in taxes or fees;
prevention;
two-thirds vote requirement;
education;
state preemption A.
exceptions;
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, THE COMMON COUNCIL OF A MUNICIPALITY MAY NOT LEVY OR IMPOSE AN INCREASE IN ANY ASSESSMENT, TAX OR FEE WITHOUT A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE MUNICIPALITY.
definition A.
Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, any person who is convicted of the personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia is eligible for probation.
The court shall suspend the imposition or execution of sentence and place the person on probation.
Any person who has been convicted of or indicted for a violent crime as defined in section 13-901.03 is not eligible for probation as provided for in this section but instead shall be sentenced pursuant to chapter 34 of this title.
THE REGULATION OF INCREASES IN MUNICIPAL ASSESSMENTS, TAXES AND FEES IS A MATTER OF STATEWIDE CONCERN.
C.
A MUNICIPALITY'S ABILITY TO INCREASE ASSESSMENTS, TAXES AND FEES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REGULATION BY A MUNICIPALITY.
Personal possession or use of a controlled substance pursuant to this section shall not include possession for sale, production, manufacturing or transportation for sale of any controlled substance.
D.
If a person is convicted of personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia, as a condition of probation, the court shall require participation in an appropriate drug treatment or education program administered by a qualified agency or organization that provides such programs to persons who abuse controlled substances.
Each person who is enrolled in a drug treatment or education program shall be required to pay for participation in the program to the extent of the person's financial ability.
E.
A person who has been placed on probation pursuant to this section and who is determined by the court to be in violation of probation shall have new conditions of probation established by the court.
The court shall select the additional conditions it deems necessary, including intensified drug treatment, community restitution, intensive probation, home arrest or any other sanctions except that the court shall not impose a term of incarceration unless the court determines that the person violated probation by committing an offense listed in chapter 34 or 34.1 of this title or an act in violation of an order of the court relating to drug treatment.
F.
If a person is convicted a second time of personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia, the court may include additional conditions of probation it deems necessary, including intensified drug treatment, community restitution, intensive probation, home arrest or any other action within the jurisdiction of the court.
G.
At any time while the defendant is on probation, if after having a reasonable opportunity to do so the defendant fails or refuses to participate in drug treatment, the probation department or the prosecutor may petition the court to revoke the defendant's probation.
If the court finds that the - 1 - S.B.
1013 defendant refused to participate in drug treatment, the defendant shall no longer be eligible for probation under this section but instead shall be sentenced pursuant to chapter 34 of this title.
H.
A person is not eligible for probation under this section but instead shall be sentenced pursuant to chapter 34 of this title if the court finds the person either:
1.
Had been convicted three times of personal possession of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia.
2.
Refused drug treatment as a term of probation.
3.
Rejected probation.
4.
Show all 73 changed rows (33 more)
Previous
Latest
Was convicted of the personal possession or use of a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia and the offense involved methamphetamine.
5.
WAS CONVICTED OF THE PERSONAL POSSESSION OR USE OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OR DRUG PARAPHERNALIA AND THE OFFENSE INVOLVED FENTANYL.
THIS PARAGRAPH DOES NOT APPLY IF THE PERSON HAD POSSESSION OF A VALID MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION FOR FENTANYL.
I.
Subsections G and H of this section do not prohibit the defendant from being placed on probation pursuant to section 13-901 if the defendant otherwise qualifies for probation under that section.
J.
For the purposes of this section, "controlled substance" has the same meaning prescribed in section 36-2501.
Legislative findings A.
Title 11, chapter 2, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding section 11-225, to read:
The legislature finds that:
11-225.
1.
Board of supervisors;
In 1996, the voters of this state passed the drug medicalization, prevention and control act, which generally provided that individuals convicted for the first or second time of personal possession or use of a controlled substance, including methamphetamine, were eligible for probation and could not be sentenced to a term of incarceration.
increase in taxes or fees;
Only on a third conviction for personal possession or use of a controlled substance could an individual be sentenced to jail or prison, though probation remained a possibility under general sentencing laws.
two-thirds vote requirement;
2.
state preemption A.
In 2006, the voters approved proposition 301 amending the law to allow sentencing a person convicted for the first or second time of personal possession or use of methamphetamine to a term of incarceration.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF A COUNTY MAY NOT LEVY OR IMPOSE AN INCREASE IN ANY ASSESSMENT, TAX OR FEE WITHOUT A TWO-THIRDS VOTE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY.
This amendment recognized the particularly dangerous and highly addictive nature of methamphetamine and allowed courts to impose jail time as a condition of probation to encourage compliance with drug treatment and rehabilitation programs.
3.
Fentanyl has emerged as a leading cause of drug-related deaths in Arizona and across the United States.
The department of health services has reported a dramatic increase in opioid-related fatalities, with fentanyl now being the primary driver of overdose deaths.
Unlike many other controlled substances, even minute amounts of fentanyl can result in fatal consequences.
- 2 - S.B.
1013 4.
Arizona's proximity to the southern border has made it a major drug cartel trafficking corridor for illicit fentanyl evidenced by law enforcement agencies reporting an unprecedented rise in fentanyl-related seizures.
5.
The extreme potency of fentanyl poses a clear and present danger to Arizona families, first responders and communities.
Without stronger legal deterrents, fentanyl will continue to fuel addiction, crime and fatal overdoses at alarming rates.
The legislature intends to amend existing law to allow courts to impose a term of incarceration on individuals convicted for the first or second time of personal possession or use of fentanyl.
THE REGULATION OF INCREASES IN COUNTY ASSESSMENTS, TAXES AND FEES IS A MATTER OF STATEWIDE CONCERN.
This amendment aligns with the policy established under proposition 301 for methamphetamine and ensures that the judicial system has the necessary authority to enforce treatment compliance and reduce the devastating impact of fentanyl abuse on individuals, families and communities.
A COUNTY'S ABILITY TO INCREASE ASSESSMENTS, TAXES AND FEES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER REGULATION BY A COUNTY.
Sec.
- 1 -
3.
Requirements for enactment;
three-fourths vote Pursuant to article IV, part 1, section 1, Constitution of Arizona, section 13-901.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by this act, is effective only on the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths of the members of each house of the legislature.
- 3 -
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. FAILED

  2. DPA

  3. DPA/SE

  4. W/D

  5. House Second Reading

  6. House First Reading.

  7. Transmit to House

  8. PASSED

  9. DP

  10. Senate Second Reading

  11. DP

  12. Senate First Reading

  13. Prefiled.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 42 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (92)

92 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 92 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

failed to pass

Failed 26 Yea · 30 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 02502
Republican 26502
Total 263004
% of votes cast 43%50%0%7%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
Aaron Márquez Democrat Nay
Alma Hernandez Democrat Not Voting
Anna Abeytia Democrat Not Voting
Betty J Villegas Democrat Nay
Brian Garcia Democrat Nay
Cesar Aguilar Democrat Nay
Christopher Mathis Democrat Nay
Consuelo Hernandez Democrat Nay
Elda Luna-Nájera Democrat Nay
Janeen Connolly Democrat Nay
Junelle Cavero Democrat Nay
Kevin Volk Democrat Nay
Lorena Austin Democrat Nay
Lupe Contreras Democrat Nay
Lydia Hernandez Democrat Nay
Mae Peshlakai Democrat Nay
Mariana Sandoval Democrat Nay
Myron Tsosie Democrat Nay
Nancy Gutierrez Democrat Nay
Oscar De Los Santos Democrat Nay
Patty Contreras Democrat Nay
Quantá Crews Democrat Nay
Sarah Liguori Democrat Nay
Seth Blattman Democrat Nay
Stacey Travers Democrat Nay
Stephanie Simacek Democrat Nay
Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Democrat Nay
Alexander Kolodin Republican Nay
Beverly Pingerelli Republican Yea
Chris Lopez Republican Yea
David Livingston Republican Yea
David Marshall, Sr. Republican Not Voting
Gail Griffin Republican Yea
James Taylor Republican Yea
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
John Gillette Republican Yea
Joseph Chaplik Republican Nay
Julie Willoughby Republican Yea
Justin Olson Republican Yea
Justin Wilmeth Republican Yea
Khyl Powell Republican Yea
Laurin Hendrix Republican Yea
Leo Biasiucci Republican Yea
Lisa Fink Republican Yea
Lupe Diaz Republican Yea
Matt Gress Republican Yea
Michael Carbone Republican Yea
Michael Way Republican Nay
Michele Peña Republican Not Voting
Neal Carter Republican Yea
Nick Kupper Republican Nay
Pamela Carter Republican Yea
Quang H Nguyen Republican Yea
Rachel Keshel Republican Nay
Ralph Heap Republican Yea
Selina Bliss Republican Yea
Steve Montenegro Republican Yea
Teresa Martinez Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Walt Blackman Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed

Passed 17 Yea · 12 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 01201
Republican 17000
Total 171201
% of votes cast 57%40%0%3%
How each member voted (30)
Member Party Vote
Analise Ortiz Democrat Nay
Brian Fernandez Democrat Nay
Catherine Miranda Democrat Nay
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Eva Burch Democrat Not Voting
Eva Diaz Democrat Nay
Flavio Bravo Democrat Nay
Lauren Kuby Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Nay
Priya Sundareshan Democrat Nay
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Nay
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Nay
Theresa Hatathlie Democrat Nay
Carine Werner Republican Yea
David C. Farnsworth Republican Yea
David Gowan Republican Yea
Frank Carroll Republican Yea
Hildy Angius Republican Yea
J.D. Mesnard Republican Yea
Jake Hoffman Republican Yea
Janae Shamp Republican Yea
John Kavanagh Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Yea
Shawnna Bolick Republican Yea
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Yea
Warren Petersen Republican Yea
Wendy Rogers Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 1013?
SB 1013 is sponsored by Warren Petersen (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1013?
This bill died with 57th Legislature - First Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1013?
Track SB 1013 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1013

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1013

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →